yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[About XDA developers] SacredDeviL666:
Glad its working for you now :good:

default posts per page is 10posts and 50 being the maximum. Reason why i had asked is because whenever this issue occurs its the last page of a thread which gets messed up.

897/898 for [MENTION=7408621]Oswald Boelcke[/MENTION] were middle page of that thread with 4486 pages, which is why he couldn't find the issue highlighted by you.

From your screenshot it was showing as last page and figured its cache issue of that thread being messed up due to post removal/moving. So went ahead with the borken work around to fix it...

Yeah, it happens sometimes with post deletion/removal/moving.
[About XDA developers] irfankamal:
So I have seen that there are so many developers on XDA who are making mod so google camera can run on non pixel devices ....so I just want to ask a question is it legal or okay to download it ? Or does google support XDA developers modding their app ??? Please reply.
[About XDA developers] SacredDeviL666:
Similar to any other mod/hack things are tweaked with the original patent/copy right in place so yet it is legal if not we will be notified before the users. this includes all custom roms and other apps.

Also gcam is officially available for non-pixel devices, you can read further here - https://www.xda-developers.com/google-camera-go-hands-on-gcam/
[About XDA developers] dxbi:
-solved-
[About XDA developers] Krowne:
I'm not sure if I should post this here. But the Xposed website is not working well some time ago. Before I didn't count the downloads, and today I have tried to upload an update of my module, and it can't be added.
[About XDA developers] mattgyver:
You mean https://xdaforums.com/xposed/modules ?

I'm able to get there. I would suggest a quick browser cache delete. Then we if the site opens. Sometimes, even powercycling your computer/device helps.
[About XDA developers] Krowne:
No, I mean https://repo.xposed.info/ which space was ceded by XDA.
[About XDA developers] mattgyver:
Able to get there via mobile.

What error are you getting? Is it saying unreachable, 500 error, 404 error? With regards to when you try uploading and adding..
[About XDA developers] Oswald Boelcke:
(CC [MENTION=4062149]mattgyver[/MENTION]) No issues either on PC with Firefox.
[About XDA developers] mattgyver:
I was able to create a project under my Xposed profile. If it specifically when you are trying to attach a file to the project?
[About XDA developers] Krowne:
Yes, the problem is when you want to add files to the project, the section to insert files is not added. The page apart from not showing the downloads, works normally, but there are those 2 problems.
[About XDA developers] mattgyver:
I've just added an apk to a test project and it uploaded fine and is visible. I just hid it, since it's not mine, but I can verify it's working on my end.

[MENTION=335322]MikeChannon[/MENTION] - who's the appropriate contact for the Xposed site, when there are issues?
[About XDA developers] Krowne:
I'm trying all day, and I can't upload it, I don't know if it will be because there are many projects uploaded, I don't know if there is a limit, and then have to delete old projects. :confused:
[About XDA developers] mattgyver:
How big is the file? Can you upload it somewhere else, and PM me the link and I'll see if I can upload it on my test project, just to rule out anything on your end?
[About XDA developers] Krowne:
It seems that the root of the problem is in the Chrome browser, I have tested Edge and it seems to work properly. :eek:

However, the download counter has not been working for some time.
[About XDA developers] mattgyver:
Extension causing an issue? That's interesting. I'm glad it's at least working in some capacity for you, then.

Not sure about the download counter. Hmmm
[About XDA developers] MikeChannon:
I note on that page it says if you have a problem with that website to use the form:

https://repo.xposed.info/contact

Have you tried that?

The problem may be that the Original Xposed Developer rovo89 has not been around for a long time.

Someone mentioned a while ago: "Xposed Module Repository domain xposed.info will expire at 01/29/2020", but that XDA have the download server. That said, I see the domain was extended in January to 2021.... so somebody is alive back there.

Mike
[About XDA developers] Krowne:
Yes, it has been more than a month since I notified where you say, but everything remains the same, that's why I have reported here in case someone could do something.
[About XDA developers] MikeChannon:
Well I see you got something working with Edge. I could possibly raise this with our server folk, but we don't have a big team and they're working on something big right now, so hopefully you can get by with Edge for a while at least.

Mike
[About XDA developers] Krowne:
Yes, at the moment I'm not making updates in a short time, no problem, when you can solve it, would be fine, but without any rush. I was just reporting the error.

I hope that the project you are working on is something related to the web, and is novel, I am eager to see it. ;)

Thanks for everything.
[About XDA developers] danialameen6:
So , it's legal if i post it here, right? So,there won't be any copyright issues and the post will be in compliance with XDA terms?

As per your suggestion i'll link to the uploaded files in some File Sharing site. But, when small files are posted, i may upload it in XDA itself.

Thanks!
[About XDA developers] Oswald Boelcke:
Affirmative, via the above link that's the very best way to request the account deletion.
[About XDA developers] XiaoMi A1:
Hello.

I am new to posting in XDA forums. I am trying my best to write informative and useful posts as a junior member. I started with XDA Labs thread, as it is one of the first threads that pop out if you use the app, and checked out Vanced YouTube thread as one of the active threads (and I also use it).

Lately I wasn't able to post in Vanced YouTube thread. In XDA Labs it said "post failed". So, before reporting in XDA Labs thread I decided to double check whether I can post in Chrome, but I had a "I am not a robot" check, and upon passing that, I got a message after clicking "reply" button, as:

So I am guessing the issue is deeper than XDA Labs. I tried to locate the technical staff, but I am not sure where the technical contact is located, as I did not see it in list with "contact us" link. If some good soul can help me, it would be greatly appreciated. I can also send a copy of the post that I was trying to write as I double checked and it had no "flag"able items inside.

With Best Regards

:angel:
[About XDA developers] Oswald Boelcke:
Sir, the link you provide above goes to the XDA Portal Team page. For any issues, I suggest to use the links provide on XDA Contacts & Help that also contains a link to report technical problems: https://www.xda-developers.com/contact/#technical
[About XDA developers] firemax13:
Anyone here, can you please delete this thread if its able https://xdaforums.com/galaxy-a80/development/able-to-install-rom-a80-t4039279 or please lock or anything that will stop that thread? It makes our device forum dirty and it doesnt belong at the development area. Thank you advance!

Can you also please lock or delete this thread too https://xdaforums.com/galaxy-a80/development/ultimate-q-rom-a805xx-t4097079 the guy who posted that thread do blind build, and he is also doesn't own the device. Please and thank you!
[About XDA developers] mattgyver:
Let me look into it... Or scots can :p
[About XDA developers] The_Walking_Playground:
Missing TWRP threads

Hi,

I posted about this in a different thread, but I think this is actually the correct place to post.

Just to add, both of those threads were working fine a couple of days ago, so something seems to have happened yesterday that broke them. Any assistance you can offer in this regard is greatly appreciated.

TWP
[About XDA developers] Siberian Tiger:
https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=82921871
[About XDA developers] The_Walking_Playground:
Hi,

Unfortunately that response is just confirming there's a problem, so I'm not sure how that helps. That's why I posted here.

TWP
[About XDA developers] Captain_Throwback:
There was just recently a TWRP release, and I updated both of the DevDB projects for those threads; however when I went to "Save and Return to Thread", I got the message being referred to in the below post. Can an admin please advise as to what happened to these two threads? I was able to update my other DevDB projects without an issue - only these two got broken. I've been following this conversation and was hoping it would be resolved since someone already posted about it here, but the issue persists, so I figured I'd better say something about it.
[About XDA developers] DiamondJohn:
I am having an issue with rejecting a friend request.

I select "Reject selected friend requests" and press the save button, the spinning icon happens next to the button, but nothing changes. The request stays active and remains as a Notification yet to be processed. I think this has happened to me previously. I cant remember how it got sorted last time.
[About XDA developers] Oswald Boelcke:
Hello, I apologise for any inconvenience that you experience and also my very late response.

With 10+M members and 35.5+M threads XDA has reached a size that very few fora have. Lately, quite a few issues were observed that led to the management decision to redesign XDA and to move to XenForo (reference) but as far as I personally see it this is a major task for all the web gurus to convert a forum of this size while letting it alive.

A few months ago, in preparation for the conversion but also to minimise the really high number of HTTP 50x errors that had occured the management decided to flatten quite a few fora that weren't too active anymore. However, as a bad side effect we got reports of about five DevDB threads (never "normal" threads) in these flattened fora that weren't anylonger editable or accessible by their owners or in other words they disappeared.

I assume the same happened to your thread. It was a DevDB thread in a now flattened forum, wasn't it.

In I believe three occasions, our web gurus were able to create a fix and to recover the threads but it took a few weeks; I guess we should accept that the main focus is on the move to XenForo.

May I suggest to consider to create the missing thread simply new - if possible! However, I also suggest to not create it currently as a DevDB thread. If your "old" thread re-appears we could in turn close the new one and copy all collected posts to the old. If it doesn't re-appear we can convert the new thread to a DevDB one at a later state.

I hope my suggestion will find your consent. Please advise if the moderators' team can be of any assistance.

[MENTION=335322]MikeChannon[/MENTION] Sir, any comment to above or further suggestions?

Sir, this issue is new to me and I haven't heard about it in the past. Could we test or explore a bit?

How about if you send me a friend request that I could reject and check what happens? (by the way: in reality I would never reject such a request by you!)

Just as a remark: In the past, I've rejected a few request without any issues but it's too long ago to provide a valid information.
[About XDA developers] MikeChannon:
I think you summed it up nicely. I'm sure Captain_Throwback (hey long time no contact;)) remembers the good 'ol days when things ran quickly and smoothly;):)

Well we're trying to get back to that situation with fairly major work going on in the background. It HAS broken some things but because some of those features may not exist going forward, priority is not being given to fix them. So, yes, recreating the thread is the best idea.......... I appreciate that is going to be very very annoying for those people affected, but long term it's best;)

Mike
[About XDA developers] Captain_Throwback:
Hey Mike! Indeed it has been a long time. The forum has certainly grown since I was a Senior Mod in the Windows Mobile forums back in the day. So I understand glitches happen. I'm not really sure how much those threads were being used, so I may just leave them alone until someone asks what happened to them, at which point I'll consider re-creating them if they don't magically reappear before then.

I do have a related question, though - are DevDB threads going to continue to be a thing, or should all threads just be created as "regular" threads? Because I also have an issue with another one of my DevDB threads: https://xdaforums.com/chef-central/android/tool-universal-htc-ruu-rom-decryption-t3382928

When I try to add a Download to the Downloads tab of the project in the above thread, the window that opens gives me the message "Missing or incorrect project information." Is there any way to fix that?
[About XDA developers] MikeChannon:
Hey M:) Windows Mobile eh... and HTC ruled the world, shhhhh you're giving our age away:D

I'd stick to regular threads at this time. There may be some continuing form of Devdb but even if we tracked down the bug (incorrect project info.) it might be a short lived fix.

Mike
[About XDA developers] Oswald Boelcke:
Good morning, Sir!

I've just rejected your friendship request without any issues (please refer to attached screenshots). Currently, I'm unable to identify where the problem might rest.

In order to execute the procedure again, I've also just sent a friendship request. Please attempt to reject it.

Stay safe and stay healthy!

Regards

Oswald Boelcke
[About XDA developers] DiamondJohn:
[IMG="face palm"]https://github.githubassets.com/images/icons/emoji/unicode/1f926-2642.png[/IMG]

hmmm... I know where iiiIIIIiii went wrong.

There is a small checkbox on the icon for the user that needs to be checked before you save your changes. DOH!.
[About XDA developers] Oswald Boelcke:
:) Yeah, that was my assumption but I didn't want to mention it. Instead I decided to provide as detailed screenshots as possible...:good::highfive:
[About XDA developers] firemax13:
Any moderator here of samsung area? Because I'm requesting for cleaning up the Samsung Galaxy A71 Development area, there are tons of non development threads that are posted in the development area. Please anyone can you please delete the non-development threads? Thank you in advance and Thank you for helping!
[About XDA developers] the_scotsman:
You mean here: https://xdaforums.com/galaxy-a71/development

There was 1 non-dev thread. I've moved it. Unless I'm missing something, 1 thread isn't really tons? :confused:

Perhaps another mod beat me to it :laugh:
[About XDA developers] firemax13:
Sorry for using tons hehehehehe. I mean there is two non-dev threads on there. Then the one is moved and the other one is still there, but anyway thank you for moving it and cleaning it!

Edit: Here is the thread link https://xdaforums.com/galaxy-a71/development/firmware-t4108043
[About XDA developers] Oswald Boelcke:
Just as a heads-up or hint: Besides reporting such issues by a post in this thread, another very suitable way to alert the moderators team is to report such a thread via the report function.
[About XDA developers] firemax13:
Got it! Thank you for the hints!
[About XDA developers] mrrocketdog:
apologies girls & guys , no report button on xda legacy app. and none found from webview.

"your google playstore is blocked ....." thread. this post

https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=83469433

uhhmmm ; does that belong?

sorry for any inconvience.
[About XDA developers] woodman:
Addressed! Thanks :)

Weird that you aren't able to see the report button on mobile version of the website. :confused:
[About XDA developers] Padme$h:
I am having problems logging into my account.
[About XDA developers] Oswald Boelcke:
Which problem? Could you specify? It seems you were logged in when you posted.
[About XDA developers] paolocorpo:
Dear

very nice the new website: CONGRATULATIONS !!

DO you know when will be correctly running the Tapatalk feature ??
[About XDA developers] mrrocketdog:
i can now!!! lol. appreciate it being added to the new app.:good:
[About XDA developers] woodman:
Late reply LOL 😂
[About XDA developers] vbenkovskyy:
Hello. Year ago I was banned and few days ago with help of admins my account @Vlaaaad was reactivated.

Also I have asked admins to change my old username @Vlaaaad to new one @vbenkovskyy to not create multiaccount.

Admins helped me and @Vlaaaad changed to @vbenkovskyy with saving all my posts etc.

All was working before forum planform update and few days after. Today I have opened XDA and saw that there is no user @vbenkovskyy anymore :(

There is @Vlaaaad in which I can't login with 'Opps we ran into problems!/Sequrity error appeared.' (screenshot)

Please help me :(

[I don't need second account, just rename @Vlaaaad to @vbenkovskyy, THANK YOU].

Edit: admin helped me to activate this account so I could post here and PM to admims dorectly

Question SOLVED, thanks! ;)
[About XDA developers] r3k0:
Hi, So since the new site has been running i have not been able to login with my old account.

It said wrong password, but i can't change it due to the email for the account is about 10 years old and now it does not exist :( (This is with firefox on my pc, i don't use the app)

:/
[About XDA developers] MikeChannon:
Hi

Just send an email to webmaster[at]xda-developers.com

Include your username and the old unavailable email address and we can get you back in.

Mike
[About XDA developers] r3k0:
Thanks, Mike, will do that now.
[About XDA developers] paolocorpo:
Thanks
[About XDA developers] atttoush:
What are the requirements to publishing a ROM on XDA. Even though it's clear that there should be a link to the source code to repo (under GPL), a lot of the roms I see are published without sources. How can we verify the authenticity, from a security and privacy perspective? What stops a dev from publishing a ROM with malicious code as it will be tough to verify it without source code? It's usually the case of many roms I've seen recently on many forums.
[About XDA developers] DSA:
samsung etc roms wont have a link to source code as the manufacturers dont provide it, all aosp roms will have a source code as its based either on aosp or lineage

(This has been covered multiple times before on xda, a search will provide more for you)
[About XDA developers] strongst:
It depends on the license model. Not every open source license model requires to publish the source after modification and publication of the binaries.

You have to check where specific software is released under(Apache, GPLv2, GPLv3 etc.). There are plenty of different license models out there and xda-developers respect each of them 😉

For kernels you can check our requirements HERE .
[About XDA developers] DiamondJohn:
I think what the poster is asking is, what is stopping a dev from not linking the sources in the OP.

I have published a number of ROMs on XDA, and although I personally posted links to the sources and device tree's etc. There was nothing I remember stopping me from creating a new thread to distribute my ROM without providing links to the sources. Actually, I now remember a ROM I created a few years back and only a few months back, someone asked for a a link to the device tree :oops: obviously I had forgotten at the time, so added it when asked.

IF its a policy of XDA, then i guess users should report the post/thread.

However, a thing to note, if I was malitious, there would be nothing stopping me from posting a link to "clean" sources but building and distributing a ROM based on malicious source :devilish: And hence I normally build my own ROMs from source (in case someone else did that, Im looking at you "Midnight", and share them here on XDA). Also because I historically have used legacy devices that other devs have long moved on from.
[About XDA developers] atttoush:
Indeed, it's just about transparency. I try to build most ROMs myself, but I have to go through a lot and most of the time I don't succeed here on XDA. I never check every line of every code, but you can still to some extent minimize the risks taken, when everyone has access to the build source code. Flashing someone's ROM without device tree/source in the thread is worrying for me, and I was wondering about the XDA policy of mandatory publishing such information (device tree/source code to build). LineageOS already does that systematically. And I would like to see that enforced on here. At the end of the day, this will improve security and trustworthiness of ROMs, and lure more people into here.
[About XDA developers] atttoush:
I hope to see a "Trustworthy" score for each custom ROM (or "flash this module") thread on XDA. If the devs of a custom ROM publish their full source code, with their build instructions, and device tree, it should be rated higher than someone who slaps a zip file on a thread and entrusts people to flash it. It should be an important criteria for people to judge what ROMs to choose. A lot of people are afraid of their work being copied by other devs, basically the early XDA drama of "kanging" a feature from other ROMs, but that's what open source is about, and what I thought XDA was about. I'm not sure if the mission statement changed along the way, or I got the wrong idea.

My point is, if the current policy on XDA does not enforce devs to publish their ROMs source code transparently, it should at least provide more info to (new) users to make informed decisions, to protect their security/privacy.
[About XDA developers] DiamondJohn:
ROM source is a completely different thing than app source. Im pretty sure that the legal requirements of licensing the source of an android ROM is that it to too is opensource. Apps on the otherhand are a totally different thing. And as I said in another thread (not sure if you were there too). I accidentally forgot to include the device source link in a ROM I published a few years ago, and only recently someone asked regarding the device source. I quickly updated the OP to include it, but no XDA overlords pointed it out to me at the time.
[About XDA developers] strongst:
If you come across harmful software, you can report it (see forum rules).

XDA developers enforces open source licensing as explained before. If a piece of software is released under a specified license model, we respect that.

We are a platform where people met each other, we are not a store where we sell software and are responsible for what we sell 🙂

You can always ask the developer about the rom source when it's missing or whatever source you need,I'm sure you'll receive an answer🙂

Also, you have the choice what piece of software you flash when there are no sources that you want to study for yourself, then compile and compare with the binary given by the developer.

It is always a piece of trust, whether you use a stock rom with included backdoor or a custom rom without.

You have always doing this decision/investigation by yourself due to specific requirements of each human 😉
[About XDA developers] paolocorpo:
Is there somebody that can give mw this info ? Thanks

Paolo
[About XDA developers] DSA:
took 5 seconds to find this..
[About XDA developers] paolocorpo:
Thanks but ...

The integration in Tapatalk app would sound better to me ...
[About XDA developers] astankov:
For me too!

Sorry to say that but new xda app is no different than opening the site with browser so I tried it and remove it it is useless. Really miss the Tapatalk integration 😔😔😔
[About XDA developers] paolocorpo:
Me too
[About XDA developers] TheMystic:
Is that still a limitation that cannot be addressed? I mean is it not possible to have the new username updated in comments where a user has been quoted?
[About XDA developers] woodman:
It is still the same behaviour on XenForo, other members' post containing a quote remain untouched after a username change.