yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
Use Ultimate only if you don't need ExFat support AND you've tested your device can handle it. I use this as the chip in my device is able to handle the UV'd stuff. If it doesn't work for you, Stable Release should.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ajaxchen:
Dear Sir,

After flashed v0.6 , ZKFI07 camFW still got FC all the time . Reboot then clear cache and dalvik cache didn't help . BTW , v0.6 works great in the other camFW version so far . Thanks a lot for your effort .
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] EdgaBimbam:
Flashed v 0.6, so smooth :)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] DR0IDMANIAC:
Thanks for the new release Sar, was talking to u on Facebook page,im Orlando...flashing time hehe :good:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] EdgaBimbam:
Even benchmark increased alot, was 6120~, now from first run 6500 quadrant
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] bhasg1007:
Installed it full smooth but camera unable to connect error :(
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] DamBadz:
What rom do your use? Thx:)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] EdgaBimbam:
Stock odexed alj3
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] DR0IDMANIAC:
6206 on my benchmark and no problems with camera,all working perfect with my rom and this kernel,thanks Pongster :good:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
All 3 builds have the patch nebkat made to fix camera errors. We know the root cause of the bug but I'm not sure what solves it if the patch above doesn't.

Does anyone on the ZK camFW have it fixed on redpill?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
Please use CWM to install.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] bhasg1007:
Camera is working on Stock, Perseus, Neak, NoteCore, T.....
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Tkbf:
Ultimate version does not support exFAT, then what format is recommended for extrnal sd?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] moneyrain:
ultimate 0.7 cant mount my 64 gb fat 32 sdcard.

can you please check this issue?

What can i give u an hand ?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
You're certain its fat32? Can you test the stable release as well?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] moneyrain:
stable release 0.6 mount ok my sdcard
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
Looks like you're card is formatted as exfat. Could you check that just to be sure?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] mdalim:
Same here..wanamlite 1.5, redpill 0.6 .camera not working. Working on all the other kernel
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
You'll need to use what works. Not sure why the fix didn't work. For now, if you're on the ZK firmware you'll have to use another kernel.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
You'll need to use fat32 or use the Stable release.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] moneyrain:
my bad, i dont regnize that the phone has formated my card to exfat, i will try fat32 later
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] vvsiz:
Hi pongster, thanks for the new kernels. Flashed RedPill Ultimate 0.7, everything works just fine here, the card is recognized, the camera works as it should, no issues so far. It is as smooth as ever.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] gtizon:
Running CM10. Will use AOSP version :)

AOSP successfully installed! For some reason screen looks sharper. Placebo maybe. Dunno for sure. Thoughts Sar?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] EdgaBimbam:
Hmm noticed also a bit more sharpness on stable 0.6v. Pongster is it placebo or you have modified smt?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
Must be CM custom mdnie settings. It's only applied to the aosp version. Thank codeworkx and Team Hacksung for that.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] gtizon:
Nice nice! Are you using sammy or cm/based ROM?

---------- Post added at 06:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:26 PM ----------

Hard to decide. I love Sammys camera. CM or AOSP camera sucks kinda. But love just the openess of vanilla android. Choices. :eek:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] CitizenLee:
Camrea and S Pen stuff keeps me on Sammy but stuff like per app DPI tempts me away from Sammy. I feel your pain :)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] toofank:
Thanks for the fastest and smoothest kernel !
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
I'm torn between the 2 since I like testing everything. :)

If WiFi tethering worked on cm10 I'd spend more time there.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] nicregi:
Using redpill Ultimate. -50 works well for me.

Cool honestly! Thanks for that!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] gtizon:
Worked for some previously I heard. Hopefully they sort that out. Sticking with CM in the meantime with your kernel. Considering PA tho.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
Love the chip in the Note 2... I started 200 at 800mV and increased by 25mV until 1000. Then I increased between 50-75 until 1600.

That's my current sweet spot. :)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] jauhari:
Thanks.. download 0.7
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] SHouSHax:
[deleted message]
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Vijay563:
Veindroid v3 and redpill 0.6 .......working fluently...... Camera working .....no problems...

Battery performance awesome

Thanks

JMKLabs-GalaxyNoteII
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Tkbf:
Flashed Ultimate 0.7 a few hours a ago, upgraded from Stable version 0.5.

The first impression is, booting up is super fast!

External sd card is also recognized, I re-format it by directly using native tool (Settings/Storage/Format SD Card) of stock LJA.

Expecting better battery performance thanks to some UV tweak, may report back later.

Good job pongster!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Zanr Zij:
I'm using your 0.7 Ultimate:

- Very good battery life. I can UV CPU about 100-150mv each step.

- No problem found. Work well with 64GB FAT32.

- I wish your kernel has better performance.

Gread job! Keep it up! Thank you!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] EdgaBimbam:
Anyone have tried rev 0.6 or 0.7v with latest 4.1.2 leak? Thanks
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] therockk:
Flahed onto my Note 2 on WanamLite ROM V1.5. Flashed the RedPill Rev 0.6 variant. So far great performance and so far amazing battery life. LOVE IT! Thanks Pongster and keep up the great work!

P.S: like I said above I flashed the Rev 0.6 variant. If I wanted to try out the ultimate in and I flash 0.7 Ultimate on top of 0.6. Will I have any problems?

Sent from my Galaxy Note 2 - N7100
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] phly-phantom:
Flashed Mr Luong based on 4.1.2 leak about 2 hours ago. Had to remove tons of bloatware through titanium backup, but now its nice.

As Kernel I am using redpill ultimate 0.7 which performs really fast and smooth.

So far DLJ2 radio, camera and system apps are running great. I hope to have a lot of battery potential with ultimate 0.07 but I guess I have to give the ROM and the Kernel some time to settle.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] avetny:
Benchmark droped down, from 6700 to 6100.

But between you and me 0.6 working much more faster and smoothly than 0.5.

I just :( little bit about benchs.

Best regards ! Thank you for a sick kernel !
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Vijay563:
On my 7100 ... Benchmark increased margnally .... Bootup speed is good....

Yet to test more........

Hope good

JMKLabs-GalaxyNoteII
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] therockk:
That's still pretty good. A few different factors play into benchmarks. And you very rarely ever need to use as much power as the benchmarks do when they're running. And same for me. V0.6 is running smoothly for me as well in comparisons to V0.5.

Sent from my Galaxy Note 2 - N7100
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Zanr Zij:
This kernel: 62xx-64xx

Neak kernel: 69xx-71xx :) ( same stock kernel )

Sent from my GT-N7100
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] NXJeff:
Omega v 6.1 Camera still doesn't work on both latest standard version and ultimate version.

Other kernels are just work fine. Hope you will fix it, your kernel is great. :good:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
Its probably the camFW version bug. Not sure how users can change their camFW but it might be another way of doing it.

For now if you're on ZK camFW you'll have to use whatever works.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
Benchmarks scores? Quadrant at that? Congrats on the high scores. Please read the FAAAQ on page 1.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] micky387:
Thanks man for your hard work.

Enjoy to use on my note 2 since my old SGS2
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] technonerd92:
Will Voodoo sound ever make it to your kernel?

Awesome work on the kernel. :):thumbup:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] bongbongcong:
RedPill 6 or 7(ultimate), which one is better for noob/newbie

:victory:Hi, excuse me:). So which the best one for normal Android user, RedPill 0.6 or 0.7(ultimate):confused:??? Sorry, i'm newbie/noob. What's main difference RedPill 0.6 & 0.7(ultimate):confused:. Also can i flash this kernel with TWRP?

Thank you very much:good:. Appreciate :good::good::good:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] nicregi:
Changelog is on the page 1. Read it up buddy. Each has their pros and cons so yes, you need to read up. Information doesnt just come like that :)

Anyway, go with stable since you are new. Ultimate is more towards advance users :)

---------- Post added at 07:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:16 PM ----------

Benchmarking is useless. I think this is the...100th time i an saying but...haha...

It is just to show off and to waste time :D
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
I was hoping supercurio would be able to contribute a voodoo implementation as he's the guy I know who has the most experience in this area and I think he also owns a Note 2. I'm not sure he will though and I don't know enough about it to port it properly at the moment. If we ever do get a fully working voodoo implementation for the Note 2 from anyone, I will try and include it.

It depends on what you use for your sdcard and the ROM's you plan to use. If you plan on moving back and forth from a Stock ROM to a CM10 ROM I would use the Ultimate since you won't be able to use ExFat properly on any AOSP based ROM's without using 3rd party apps.

If you need ExFat support then Stable is the only bet. Unless you have the ZK camFW version which may not work on this kernel currently. While I could just rebase to a known working tree and get it working, I'd really like to understand what's causing the bug and how to fix it so I learn something new too. The current kernel patch by nebkat is already included here but it doesn't seem to solve it for those on camFW ZK. I'm still looking into it. It's hard to test though as I have the GK camFW that actually works.

I'm not sure if you can flash via TWRP. I only use CWM to test. Please try it and give feedback so I can update the posts if it does work on TWRP.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] EdgaBimbam:
@nicregi, sorry if it was asked already, but didnt understand one thing, ultimate already undervolted or it is given ability to undervolt by ourselfs? thx
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
You can UV the ARM voltages. The cpu is not UV'd by default. You can use setCPU, ROM Toolbox, Voltage Control and any other tools that can set UV values properly. Please test stability before trying any crazy values though. You probably already know the drill.

The busfreq, lcd regulator and led touch keys are UV'd by default. If you're running without any hiccups then Ultimate works for you. :)

So, CPU not UV'd by default. It's a user option.

busfreq, lcd regulator and led touch keys are UV'd by default.

Please check the commit logs on github for more details.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] EdgaBimbam:
oh ok thank you, sorry if the question was stupid. :) Flashed 0.7v on 4.1.2, so far no problems, superb smoothness
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] sabankuru:
v.0.7 with Omega 7.0 and 4.1.2, very fast and clean, thx a lot!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] maxpaynezm:
Problem with rom caponmod n2 whit t his kernel ultimate, when i play Batman game, I have sometimes black screen , with stock kernel no problem.

Odoslané z GT-N7100 cez Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
Haven't touched anything that should change the stock GPU performance. Can you get a logcat of when this happens so we can see what might be causing it?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] gtizon:
Sorry Sar I missed this. Ultimate works on CM10 ROM?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Vijay563:
juice defender is FC, with 0.7 ultimate & veindroid v3 ROM 4.1.1, same problem with 0.6 but thers no problem with 0.5 stable

hve tried clearing cache but same FC

any answers,,,, need help

thanks in advance
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Cey123:
Will there be a version with the features of 0.7 ultimate but with exFAT support? Cause I think I'm not the only one who uses a 64 GB microSD card. On the other side, UV support sounds great.

Does the kernel also support cfs as scheduler? Cause stock kernel works best with this scheduler I feel considering smoothness.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
Nope. Please use aosp version.

Please get me a log cat. (I don't recommend such apps though as they end up eating more power)

It already uses CFS. Unless you mean io scheduler cfq.

Use stable if you need exfat support.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] luminouche:
Hi

AOSP version is working with Liquid ?

Thanks !
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] micky387:
AOSP kernel is it compatible with Resurrection Remix AOKP Edition ??
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] mynamesteve:
Pongster! Hope your well, Real good to see you around these parts and working you magic. looks like i made the right choice of handset, Hyperdroid + red pill ftw! :D

Your aosp version is working very well with Utacka's paranoid. Was getting a little lag in the xda app (i seem to get this on all kernels) but setting force GPU rendering and disable hw overlays in dev options fixed that right up. Will have to give it a bit more time to test battery life but so far so good!

Thanks again! you know I love your work but no harm in telling you again :p
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] D.O.C:
Hey notsteve!, how u doing?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] mynamesteve:
Haha DOC you legend! You got yourself a note 2 as well? This gets better :D

Hope you good dude! Got kinda set up with a desktop at my new pad now so if you guys need a test monkey let me know :good:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] afilopou:
I just read from rom thread that its cm based so yes aosp kernel is compatible
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] 2b2b:
Hi!

WANAM 2.0, Twrp latest version, workin perfect :cool:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Cey123:
Sorry, I meant CFQ - is there any reason to delete this scheduler instead of offering it as an option?

My question was if you are going to include UV also for the normal edition of the kernel. :)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] 2b2b:
fyi: screen rotation is not working with the newest leaked rom 4.1.2

testet: 05 06 07

cheers!2b2b
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Pacas:
Working With wanam 2.0 (4.1.2)

Sent from my Note 2
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
I havent tested that.

Maybe you can try and see if it works for you. If not then we can see if that can be added in a future version.

I removed cfq as my tests from way back show a tweaked deadline and sio are superior for flash based devices. cfq, while it can be tuned for flash, is designed for mechanical hard drives. Please see the data I linked to in personal tests I made with io schedulers on page 1. If you can run similar tests that show cfq to be superior I could include it as an option.

UV ability in stable? Still deciding on that one. I want to keep potentially unstable mods on the the ultimate as the stable is for those who don't need tweaking abilities. That could still change though.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] sunwee:
hope you'll add in UV ability in the stable version too. some of us had to stick to the stable version because it supports exfat. thanks for the great job!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] liljom:
I tested, and it doesn't work. I tested 2 ubuntu images and 2 scripts. Can you do something about it, pliiiiz?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] aegeuss:
I also have this problem on Omega rom v7.0 I passed from v6.0 with non wipe.

Regards
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Daemos:
Using Rev0.7 doesn't allow Fastdormancy app to work to disable fast dormancy, get mysql database error, but switching to neak kernel works, haven't tried 0.6 or 0.5
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Tkbf:
LJ2 from sammobile with 0.7, no similar problem here.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] CitizenLee:
v6.0 to v7.0 is a new base - you should have wiped first ;)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] bongbongcong:
Thanks your answer, NICREGI

:good:Thanks a lot NICREGI, i believe this kernel much better than stock kernel, am i right?

---------- Post added at 06:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:21 AM ----------

:victory:Thank you - thank you so much PONGSTER :victory:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] GonDr:
Hi pongster, is your kernel compatible with 4.1.2 roms ?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] sabankuru:
problem with 4.1.2 -> no Led-notif. - sensor problem (screen rotation, nfsmw sensor control not working )
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
Not sure Samsung has released their source for the 4.1.2 kernel so things may break. Which Rom you on? I read some devs have included files that may allow you to use custom kernels with 4.1.2

Until Sammy releases the code I can't promise it will work since I can't build to test it.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] D.O.C:
Lol, I did not noticed those things (I tested just briefly, and those were not on my checklist) :) Thanks.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] sabankuru:
i have omega rom 7.0. now installed neak kernel, everything works fine. with redpill, still have problems. i like to use redpill, if you can fix it...
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Tkbf:
I am on 4.1.2 LJ2 from sammobile and flash Redpill 0.7, all your problems do not exist on my side, only nfs I can't confirm as nowhere to test it here.

Did you wipe data/factory reset before you flash LJ2? I did.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] sabankuru:
yes, wipe data/factoryreset/dalvik cache/cache
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] vvsiz:
Weird, everything works just fine for me with RedPill v0.7 and Omega v7 (4.1.2 ROM). Led-notifications work as usual, screen rotation is OK as well.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Tkbf:
Then, it's just weird, already use LJ2+Redpill 0.7 for about 2 days, I am sure this baby is better than 4.1.1 LJA.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Daemos:
I'm having issues with Gokanmoral's FastDormancy disabler with this kernel and Omega 7.0, works fine on neak and stock omega kernel.

Image is as posted:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] sabankuru:
just reflashed omega 7 and then redpill 0.7. wipe dalvik and cache. now it works fine and no error anymore lol :D
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Tkbf:
Good to know, cheers.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] SandeepEmekar:
Waiting for the download links from past 1 hour. :|
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] interfreak:
Patience is a virtue..
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] goddamnit:
Reboot ,go to wifi setting ,switch on wifi ,connected ,switch off wifi

Device freeze .

Tested 3 times :P

Rom : Omega 4 ,firmware base LJ3

Dalvik / Cache cleared .

Still testing .
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
I have one in development. Along with kristof and his secret aosp based release which I shall never mention again. :)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] xcxa23:
what rom are u on?

mine on ARHD, wipe cache, dalvik-cache and fix permission and does not encounter your problem
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] interfreak:
WOW very smooth and quick!

Not that I rely on such things very much, but just ran a Quadrant benchmark (3 runs):
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] goddamnit:
After reflash kernel ,it seem to be gone .

Let me try again.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
No options to oc or uv at all. :)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] interfreak:
No issues for me on Wanamlite's stock ZSLJ7 ROM.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
Logs please. I'm not sure that's kernel related unless I see some logs. WiFi works perfectly here. No need to clear or wipe anything as this is a kernel, not a ROM. :)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] sumeshd:
Ultimate version eta was 2 hrs but now is tbd..

I was waiting for ultimate..should I keep waiting or flash the base version?? :confused:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
You don't need exfat? I'm still deciding if I should release them together as users might use that instead and then need exfat but it won't work at all. :)

I'll see if I can pm you the link in case I don't release the Ultimate version today.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] sumeshd:
Thank you very much..I have formated my sd as fat32 and not exfat..

If that is what it is meant for..

Thanks in advance..
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
Please flash the base version first. I'm still adding some stuff to the Ultimate that may be too risky for the Stable branch. Will PM you when its ready so you can help test. :)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] sumeshd:
Sure..thank you..flashed base version for now..
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] nowy57:
can we count on VOODOO implementation ?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] richlum:
Flashed the kernel about an hour ago and no problems so far with Wannamlite v1.2

I've used wifi, mobile data, BT, USB midi, USB gamepad, USB flash drive and all work fine.

I haven't really notice any difference in the UI experience (opening and closing apps and menus, moving between home screens etc.). Stock was already pretty good anyway,

I'll see how the battery fares once it's charged up.

Thanks for the kernel.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pongster:
Personally, I don't know too much about it to properly implement it and fix whatever bugs that may arise. I'd wait for the master of all things sound and display, supercurio, to get voodoo properly implemented for this device. :) Not sure if he will, but I am hoping he does. He's got the experience that would enable him to get it done much better than I ever will.

Supercurio, if you ever drop by this thread, please know that we are waiting for your official voodoo implementation for the n7100.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] edwinpang:
Thats too bad...
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] SandeepEmekar:
Super cool smooth.

Thank you very much Pongster.