yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Dancube:
Woohoo! Thanks kristofpetho, looking forward to trying it.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] sswagonman:
Wow still a tiny Sammy rom. Well done :)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] aamitabh28:
Been waiting for this..thanks kristof!
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] gannjunior:
I quote this question too. Is it possible to choose/change between 240 DPI and standard (280?) and viceversa?

thanks!
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] suheri:
Thanks! Will flash immediately :) Loved your dark ui. Makes the note 2 a bit less kiddy.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] kristofpetho:
No, this is 240DPI only. At 280, all rescaled apps will have to rescaled again.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] gannjunior:
ok tnks Kristo ;)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] mimoun103:
thanks

Thank you dear

Is there a theme or other additives???????
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Vijay563:
waiting for this....... downloading... will report feedback

million thanks Kirstof...
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] gannjunior:
HI Kristo,

I think that your rom and this rom http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1956057 have some similarity. (but "battery plus rom" is not updated by many time).

Do you think you could prepare for your rom something like a patch that undervolt cpu with a script during boot? or, if it's not too difficult, to give me some advices to do it by myself.

thanks!
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] burimii:
Kristof I am coming from your AOSP ROM can u please post me the baseband for this rom cuz I the Radio is not working thank you
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] aguadilu:
Hi, here a new arrived at the GN2 world. Just wonder how is battery life here compared with Omega 10, has anyone tried both?

Enviado desde mi GT-N7100 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Dancube:
I tried the previous Omega and it is very different to this. I much prefer HyperDroid Pegasus, it seems quicker and is leaner, battery life is looking good too.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] gannjunior:
what do u mean? that hyperdroid drains less battery?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] aguadilu:
Yes, I wonder if Hiperdroid + redpill drains less battery than Omega 10

Enviado desde mi GT-N7100 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] OpenMinded:
I was wondering about this roms battery life compared to stock.

Thanks for your work!

Awaiting theming :)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] betoNL:
Hello there,

Simplistic Framework mod won't be compatible on 240 DPI right?

I got used to that mod .....

.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] agentdark45:
I lost my signal / the rom tells me I have no SIM inserted when flashing v1.0 (coming from Wanam 2.4). So I tried to restore my EFS folder, thinking it was a glitch.

Now I'm stuck at the "booting" anim screen! I've tried a full wipe and reinstall - Help!
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] xenix96:
Thanks you kristofpetho & pongster for this 240DPI HyperDroid release!!!!!!!! :good: :)

I will check it womorow after work.

:fingers-crossed: :good: Hyperdroid forever since SGS2!!!! :good: :fingers-crossed:

By the way great regards to D.O.C and the (active/inactive) HyperDroid-Androidmeda Team !!!!

You make all the time only great brilliant and solid roms for the community here !!!!

Cheers
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] moonjak:
Awesome job. No need for 240dpi tweaking anymore. Works like a charm! :)

Let's put it under test :)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] The Transporter:
Best rom out there !

Here is my report:

1) The first version 243 Mb, the last one is almost 500Mb, how come ?

2) The dialer in 240DPI is middle left centered, and so, not very nice nor usable, installed Dialer One to cope.

3) The Simplistic framework works perfectly, nothing to say

4) the AOSP Avetny theme is not working in 240DPI, you have to set the DPI to 264 to get everything working.

5) Many thanks to you for this rom, I was running Wanam which is also great, but I like the lightness of this one :)

Bye !
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Nathalex27:
Thanks finaly a 240 dpi rom. Should be standard option imho. 340 is awefull. And setting 240 on any other rom causes issues. Camera etc.

Great work.

Flashing just for 240. Should be in thread title.

I'm not the only one
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] The Transporter:
It's weird because going to 240DPI from any samsung based rom is super easy !

The must have application is this one: https://play.google.com/store/apps/...wxLDEsImNvbS5qcnVtbXkubGliZXJ0eS50b29sYm94Il0.

Of course, you'll have some problem with some applications, but that's bearable.

I think one of the best DPI for this phone is 264.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] albireox:
Works/looks perfect here.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] The Transporter:
Then it's probably because I've installed this highly recommended theme: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1930847, never mind :)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Nathalex27:
I know and you can just adjust dpi in buildprop but for me the little issues anoy the hell out of me. :)

Thanks for thinking with me though.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] albireox:
Most likely. Try to flash the 240 dpi dialer mod from Bala. It should work.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] agentdark45:
Bump! Please help guys! I've gotten my hands on a stock DLL4 h3g UK rom and flashed with ODIN, and still stuck at the boot anim (the three UK boot anim keeps looping)! I've even tried an efs restore through PhilZ's recovery.

What on earth shall I do to get my phone working again?? Freaking out slightly here!
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] The Transporter:
Force close :'(
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] albireox:
Are you sure its the one for this rom? It should work perfectly at 240dpi.

Try to delete it from system/app (it's secphone.apk) and then flash it again.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] The Transporter:
Is it this one ? http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2051656
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Mushroom.:
So you installed that AOSP theme and the only issue you had was with the dialer?

Thinking of installing that theme also.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] The Transporter:
I think it's about to be working with the dialer from bala_gamer here: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2001577&highlight=dialer

Direct link: http://www.mediafire.com/?agojt65iy0twagr

I'm using this rom in 264 DPI to have it fully themed, and no, I don't have any single problem, I love it !
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] albireox:
That's what i said :)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Mushroom.:
Awesome.

But how does having it in 264 dpi help you get it fully themed?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] ballaz:
Awesome ROM, however flashed 3 separate clean installs and still cannot get Google's backup and restore to work. Is this part of the ROM or is there a different BackupManager protocol with this ROM. I could be doing something wrong because it only occurs on this ROM, MIUI, and AOSP ROMs. Any help would be much appreciated. Again thanks for updating this ROM.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] The Transporter:
If you use a DPI < 264, some parts of the theme won't work like the settings menu.

This is how my settings menu looks like: http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd105/maga575013/2012-11-29-21-35-19.png

---------- Post added at 10:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:55 PM ----------

Indeed it works perfectly also in 264 DPI :)

Thanks !!!

---------- Post added at 11:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:55 PM ----------

I'm also obviously using the new RedPill kernel on it, works perfectly :)

Link: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1975938
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Martux76:
Thanks, kristofpetho. Nice job.

What is the recommended modem with this? I was coming from Hypernote 0.4 and it still had the old modem (even after fullwipe and all). Can we have a zip file for the according modem please? Also I would personally like the idea of the Samsung apps in a seperate zip file, so everybody can choose if they like it or not.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] bervin:
flashed this and immediately disliked 240dpi, i switched to 320dpi although i read the warning as i really wanted to use this rom but it keeps fc-ing.. Too bad for me as i won't be able to use this because of the dpi settings.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] The Transporter:
Use wanam lite then
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] hazri1974:


May i know is it v.3.0.1 simplistic framework you flashed ?....mine didnt work......all apps in app drawer sorted in smaller row and homescreen going up and started above middle homescreen.....aosp lockscreen also looks weird and not centered and align properly....
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] The Transporter:
Yes.

Should I report that I use Apex instead of the default app drawer ?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] hazri1974:
Ok....will try to install nova launcher and see how it work....
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Nathalex27:
This rom is awesome. I tried omega 9.1 and phoenix rom before this one and wow dude.

Perfect. No bloatware but there is s pen. Just awesome.

Smooth like butter. Truly amazing.

Fast using nova at faster than light speed settings. No hiccups.

Loving 240 dpi. Please keep it or leave it as an option.

This is the most excellent sammy based rom there is.

Fast like cm10 but with samsungs most wanted app.

No aroma but just perfect out of the box.

I think I'm gonna cry, it's that perfect.

Be back on battery life later but thats kernel related. Note2core or perseus allways worked fine for me and this kernel has stweaks so I'll give it a go for a week.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] The Transporter:
Apex has more functionnalities, is faster and battery friendly...
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Nathalex27:
Don't say that. Nova is awesome too. I think it's user related.

Both are great launchers. Light. Customizable. Just one person likes Nova features and the other likes Apex more.

Its user related.

Try both for a day or 2 and see wich one you like best.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] The Transporter:
Too late :)

I was one of the first user of Nova when it was released and bought it too... then, just out of curiosity I tried Apex and I saw a difference, I bought it too :) so I do not speak without knowing them both.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] tux-lover:
Battery status. ... is this normal? I have no apps open and recent apps are cleared...
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] :
No its not normal. It drains a little bit the battery.

Here's my reports:

The idea of the dpi is great but not the best. This is how it looks like now when you try to change your wallpaper

Good luck for the next update going back to my old rom.

Cheers
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] tux-lover:
Anyone having the same issue? So I guess I need to under clock my cpu for this huh?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] :
Try to use persus kernel. And see my post before you will notice something else that I didnt like about this rom
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] tux-lover:
but i dont have issues changing wallpapers... it fine when i change wallpaper. but im using apex as my default launcher.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] ChillyChan:
I can change wallpapers just fine on TouchWiz Launcher. The problem's either in the original wallpaper size or incorrect frame adjustment. Even in stock 320 DPI, if you drag the wallpaper adjustment frame too far to the left or right, you will see a black area just like in your screenshot.

To the dev, amazing ROM. Must have spent quite some time on fixing all the sammy apps. Thank you!

Now I have a request, could you please make the dialer buttons smaller or more compact? Right now, they are too big and also vertically stretched a bit. Feels quite out of place in a 240 dpi ROM. If you don't have the time, could you please give me a hint on which values to edit in the apk? I've done some TW Launcher modding so I'm not unfamiliar with modding apks.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] ChimpNippl3s:
Pls help need google talk app so my kids can video me from there tablets but I cant find it on the rom

Thanks
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] :
there's no problem with the picture! i have tried several one and it is the same thing! when its on lockscreen it is fit! and when i go to the home screen it is just not fitting. anyways i have flashed my old rom back so! good luck to the dev :)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Nicheuji:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1879115
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] tux-lover:
Is there a mod for resizing the pop-up browser? I use it a lot but this time it's too small to read :)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] shinzi:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2017166 is this you are looking for?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] tux-lover:
That will do... a million thanks to you man:)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] abu46:
is call recording enabled on this rom??

also can someone please list the removed apks

thnx
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] darkteb:
Popup browser is resizable by long holding near bottom of the box.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] moneyrain:
I cant add any alarm event in clock app. It always fc.any one have this ?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Vijay563:
Hey dev great rom.... can u provide orignal hyperdroid pegasus wallpaper.....

Thanks kristo
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] gannjunior:
About who has battery drain problem: I see I'm not the only person. The fact is it's not a problem of a specific ROM.

I found that are at least 15 days that I'm trying many ROMS and, after I passed from XXDLL4 base to XXDLL5 base the battery drain increased violenty. With XXDLL7 it's a bit better than XXDLL5.

I don't why but, since many people have this problem, I don't think it's problem of use, of kernel or of applications installed ( rather I'm stayin very careful and I'm using my note in a conservative way but it doesn't matter)...the strange thing is that, even if I come back to some XXDLL4 rom based the battery consuption does not decrease again to the same I had 15 days ago...
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] MAMeingast:
I am absolutely in love with this ROM. Thank you so much for your awesome work, kristofpetho! Your ROMs have always been absolutely amazing (started using them on the Sensation) and HyperDroid Pegasus makes my Note II perfect! :)

Enjoy a couple of beverages of your choice on me! 6NN925137J632882M
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Martux76:
When you mean the issue with Android OS on top of the battery usage list: That seems to be a RedPill bug, which has not really an impact on your battery usage. How long does your battery last in the end?

Does someone else have a modem incompability? Which is the recommended modem for this ROM?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] sswagonman:
In my experience a rom and kernel combination needs to settle over a few days and charge cycles before u will get the optimum battery life. Mine on ll7 is getting better everyday now.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] gannjunior:
had similar problem with many other roms and other kernels....till 15 days ago (using phone in same way) I got a medium of 2-3 days.

At today 1-1.5 days.

---------- Post added at 11:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:23 AM ----------

do you think they set by themselves ?

anyway it's strange...during december I tried many rom and I always saw a large battery life...after I begun to see battery life considerably reduced...
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Martux76:
I never had better battery life from the beginning on and honestly, I am sick and tired of giving myself a hard time about it. As long as it brings me through the day, everything is just fine. Charging at night and not giving a damn...
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] agentdark45:
Simplistic framework seems to bork the ROM - the TW icons are all squashed.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] bmw-boy:
welcome back we miss you awesome ROM
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] betoNL:
Nah

The ideal situation would be OP delivering 2 versions of this rom:

240 DPI AND 280 DPI (or 290)

Or...did somebody try it on 280 DPI ?

However I have been reading that 240 DPI is not really going 100% on this, if some users need to change it to 264 DPI and/or mod the dialer ....

.

---------- Post added at 12:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:42 PM ----------

Did you try making the statusbar more transparent with simplistic?

How does it go?

.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] agentdark45:
All working now actually - what I did was replace SecLauncher.apk in system/app with the original one from the ROM, after flashing SF - this fixes the launcher / widget distortion, but leaves simplistic framework functionality in tact.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] betoNL:
Ok thanks.

I don't care about TW Launcher actually...tons of better launchers out there.

On a new phone, I always replace it right away, even before rooting . ;)

I was just wondering if SF is FULLY functional on this rom on 240 dpi

.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] firasusman:
Exactly..

This is the secret.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] OpenMinded:
I totally disagree. Fine if you want to ignore this in an ostrich way.

My phone lasts 2 days on a battery with LL4 rom.

These messages about decreasing battery are the exact reason why I am doubting to upgrade.

I would call my phone useless when it is empty after a day.

Battery life is one of the most important things for me and for a lot of other users!
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] betoNL:
If you care that much about battery life, you should know a couple of things:

1- Battery performance is way more user-related and/or kernel related than anything else

2- After freshly flashing a Rom or a Kernel, an user should wait a couple of days and run a couple of charging cycles, before jumping into conclusions about battery performance

3- The Note2 got the best battery performance out-of-the-box than any other high-end smartphone out there

Taking all that into consideration, we can conclude that 90% of all those battery draining discussions are a drag and more than useless ...

.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] gannjunior:
I disagree about this Beto. Tried many DLL4 without worry about battery life (that reached easily always 2 whole days) even if I tried 2 ROM per day. After I began to test DLL5 rom based I saw the big difference in battery drain...So, maybe before to think that "those battery draining discussions are a drag and more than useless ", I think there is something more...

ciao!
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] MAMeingast:
Has anyone been able to add additional apps to the multi-window bar? I have tried doing so using LegendK95's control application, but it doesn't work...

---------- Post added at 02:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:42 PM ----------

Also, I have another problem: I have had several blackscreens of death where the sleeping phone simply would not react to me pressing the power button... Any ideas?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Nathalex27:
There is nothing to disagree. The things stated in that post are FACTS.

I am on 10 hours with 82% left.

I listen to bt music 3 hours today in my van. Use lots a facebook and lots a whatsapp. Thing just keeps chirping ( message tone ) all the time.

Few calls.

Navigon for 20 minutes this afternoon.

And I watched the news while waiting for my bic mac menu.

Skype online 24/7

I use the kernel provided with the rom.

10 hours 18% with the heavy use of my day? Good deal. No whining here.

Edit: forgot I check xda every half hour....lol

Maybe you guys have a point but why is my battery life so good then?

Anyway if you don't hear the masses cry out "bad battery life" then it must be an app or kernelProblem.

Otherwise lots a people would be *****ing about battery life.

That is the way I see it.

With respect.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] gannjunior:
what do you want to say?

That you say the truth and I the false?

That is your experience.

My experience (and, as I already told before, it's not a problem only of this rom) and also for other users is that it seems, for some reason, battery draining got worse from XXDLL5 in forward compared to XXDLL4...

Before, with my use, I got 2 whole days and sometimes 3 days. Now (it doesn't matter which ROM) I get 1/1.5 days maximum. Also these are FACTS.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] D.O.C:
Guys calm down, there is no disagreement here, just two different experiences. Do not escalate this to something personal, remember....you are talking about battery life of your phone!.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] betoNL:
Just flashed and testing myself

Too much misinformation here:

240DPI is running flawless and no need to mod dialer or anything ( unless your are theming of course)

Simplistic Framework is NOT fully functional on 240 DPI and I am not talking about the TW Launcher, which I don't use. I am talking about other mods like transparency on statusbar and settings on multi-window that won't stick, for instance

But that got nothing to do with the Rom

Great Job and great rom for those who prefer 240 DPI

Unfortunately 280 DPI is the minimum my eyes can handle ...

.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Nathalex27:
No man, i'm just saying....the rom is good and the list in that post are facts that have been confirmed over time. Try modem change or kernel. Try it for at least a couple a charges and then come back.

Also make sure to wipe system partition before flashing.

There is no true or false just individual system configs that variate.

And if you are convinced that dll4 is better I suggest you stick with that. Whatever works best for you dude.

No offence intended.

Modems are more country related than anything.

See what modem is in you're last country update.

Use that one.

Different modems per country and cell service provider
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] freearcher:
kristofpetho, can you give me the fm radio to me? thanks!
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Martux76:
Hello!

Thank you for your very informative and helpful reply. Basically I found out, that the CSC for my region and provider (Germany & Vodafone) is N7100VFGDLL2 and the PDA would be N7100XXDLL4. Question is, where do I get these files from now? Also, I bought that device unbranded, is it of any importance?

To the battery drain issue: the 4.1.2 version also seems to drain more power than 4.1.1. But even with that previous version I had a battery life of 1,5 days, heavily depending on the usage. Maybe the point is simply tolerances in the manufacturing process of the batteries?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] abu46:
love the lightness and responsiveness of this rom, but even my eyes cant handle 240dpi

maybe 280 but no less.......
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] agentdark45:
I concur...

My main issue with such a high DPI is that widgets simply don't look as good (even when scaled). Not to mention app incompatibility issues.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] DaveHTC200:
I disagree 240 is prefect :D
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] albireox:
Then choose other roms, they are plenty who work well and are at 320 by default. I for one I'm glad there is a choice to use a working 240dpi rom. I think Note2 looks better this way than with those huge icons and widgets.

I think this one works well at 320 dpi too because all the 240dpi mods are universal afaik.