yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] johnjeevinth:
Thanks buddy.... but I just replaced the gallery and the Camera apps completely :)

Working fine for now :)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] c1ph4:
New bugs found:

1. after updating my baseband from 72 to 77 music suddenly stops after listening to some tracks and ROM reboots softly

2. when navigating through the apps in "settings" the settings program crashes randomly and you have to start all over

3. FC when playing games (happened a lot of times in "Blood Brothers". But I think personally this is ROM independent - nearly all the ROMs I tested have this problem, it's a bug from those programmers working at Mobage I think)

4. the following issue is hard: it seems the ROM has problems in calculating the free internal space in "apps". It depends, but sometimes he says 70MB free, the next time 90MB, then 110MB, goes back to 70MB and so on. In fact there should be 120MB free in my case. I do not know how to measure this correctly, sometimes when updating apps he complains that there wouldn't be enough free space which is definitely not true

So long, I'll report again when I find something else. :cowboy:
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] championswimmer:
updates kernel test3

please test
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] gordito_gr:
Is it boot_vdd3.img?

Will try today....
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] championswimmer:
no i meant here

http://icxperia.com/kxp/milestone1/

get yourdevice_M1_test3.img
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] Ghostfreak NB:
Champ....... the test3 kernel boots up fine.

Good job ! ty
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] johnjeevinth:
Testing... but will I need to flash the Rom again ???????

Update--- Flashed the kernel booted up ..... looking goood.... for now :)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] BombayBoy:
No. Just the new kernel.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] gordito_gr:
im using it already, seems excellent for the use i do...

Anything specific u want me to check?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] championswimmer:
No :p

Just that it boots or not
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] johnjeevinth:
This is not to do with the Kernel but has any one tried the OTA updater... it seems to have an issue atleast from me...

when i click the updates available.. it comes back with the following error

"Error fetching update info :Invalid ROM (_Kxp_milestone1)&device(haida)combo! "
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] gordito_gr:
i have the same issue.

Also, its a little bit tripping on wifi, since i mentioned its excellent :p
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] BombayBoy:
Didn't try it. Its not setup at the moment, likely. It involves cost or some generous donor support.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] gordito_gr:
Seriously, all over sudden i have a problem, i cant connect to my homes wifi.

Any suggestions?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] championswimmer:
My kernel was for TESTING

Wifi wont work :P

Just wanted to know it boots

Get back to whatever u wer on
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] gordito_gr:
lol, i am first time using this rom, today with the test kernel :p

what kernel do you suggest?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] championswimmer:
I dont know i dont have a neo

Lupus, fxp, pac kernel... Any one...
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] mpiekp:
WiFi is working with the test kernel :), everything that was working with fxp is still working
[Atrix 4G General] ravilov:
There is a combined all-in-one thanks/goodbye thread already. It's been created specifically to avoid creating a separate one each time someone leaves (and decides to push that piece of information on everybody).
[Galaxy 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] twinky444:
Hello all succesful app tweakers :D

I tried to tweak 9-lockscreenmod-compatible Settings.apk but I have this problem when decompiling it:

I: Baksmaling...
I: Loading resource table...
I: Loaded.
I: Loading resource table from file: C:\Users\George\apktool\framework\1.apk
I: Loaded.
W: Could not decode attr value, using undecoded value instead: ns=android, name=
theme, value=0x02070015
I: Decoding file-resources...
W: Could not decode attr value, using undecoded value instead: ns=android, name=
textColor, value=0x02050000
W: Could not decode attr value, using undecoded value instead: ns=android, name=
textColorHint, value=0x02050001
W: Cant find 9patch chunk in file: "drawable-mdpi/appwidget_bg.9.png". Renaming
it to *.png.
W: Could not decode attr value, using undecoded value instead: ns=android, name=
textAppearance, value=0x0207000f
W: Could not decode attr value, using undecoded value instead: ns=android, name=
textAppearance, value=0x0207000e
W: Could not decode attr value, using undecoded value instead: ns=android, name=
textAppearance, value=0x0207000f
I: Decoding values*/* XMLs...
I: Done.
Can't find framework resources for package of id: 2. You must install proper fra
mework files, see project website for more info.

However, I already installed framework from XXJPU and this Settings.apk is from XXJPU, and still can't decompile.

If you can help me, please, please let me know what to do to decompile it properly or what framework I need to install. Thank you :good:
[Galaxy 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] twinky444:
Someone must know this... This error is really annoying...
[Galaxy 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] twinky444:
SOLVED.

With the help of Jason-EX I succesfully decompiled it.

SOLUTION: install both framework-res.apk and twframework-res.apk (apktool if) and then decompile Settings.apk.

Thanks Jason!
[LG Revolution] I.M.famous XMAN:
Found this and it turns out it is pretty cool. Lots of tweaks. Some stuff already baked into BO. Oh, and this is for BrokenOut!!!!!

:highfive: to Fuzzy13 for pimpin' his esteem first. I found this a few days ago but was waiting for someone else to do it first. lol. Thanks Mane!!!

Original thread http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1908269

I have already made the tweak to the script and it's ready to flash. Pimp-my-ROM_LG_Revolution {it's large, very large. over 100mb. Here's your warning} Pls be easy ppl. it's on my dropbox :D I'll add a mirror after my boss kicks me out tonight :cool::laugh:

Make a backup then just flash in cwm. It will open an aroma graphical interface that will allow you to install many tweaks and a few apps. Choose stock based GingerBread ROM So far everything seems to work. Just remove any init.d tweaks that were not baked in the BrokenOut2.0. (ie...v6, tweaks, thunderbolt, etc...)

Best to start fresh!!!!!

When finished, just exit (do not reboot from pmr, you will get a cwm error). reboot system from cwm.

Enjoy!!!!!!!

***edit: If by chance you get the 'no boot animation', it's a simple fix:

Edit the line 'debug.sf.nobootanimation' of your build.prop. Change the value to 0 (zero)
[LG Revolution] iamjerry123:
Can I use this even if im not starting fresh? If so, would it be conflicting with any of the BO scripts?
[LG Revolution] I.M.famous XMAN:
The only script from stock bo that conflicts is the loopy smoothness. Pmr names it smoothness. But it will take over v6. Unsupercharge then flash pmr. But as always, make a backup!!

Just remove the baked in loopy script after you make your backup.
[LG Revolution] iamjerry123:
I dont think i have V6 unless it came WITH BO. So am i going to be fine?

So to avoid the smoothness script conflict, I should just uncheck the "smoothness" script? or what?
[LG Revolution] I.M.famous XMAN:
yes sir. :D
[LG Revolution] iamjerry123:
I dont think I saw the "smoothness"... is it part of the build.prop or what?
[LG Revolution] I.M.famous XMAN:
its fine. it won't cause any probs you'll just have 2 loopy smoothness scripts. no harm. I just deleted the one from pmr after the initial reboot. and don't get scared, the initial boot will take a min. didn't even show my boot ani. lol.
[LG Revolution] iamjerry123:
So i found the smoothness file. and I found the "PNAME="$USER_LAUNCHER";

So shold I put the com.sonyericcson launcher or whatever on there? or just leave it
[LG Revolution] I.M.famous XMAN:
I deleted that one script and use the stock loopy script from bo. It's easier to tweak.
[LG Revolution] iamjerry123:
is there a way to un-do some of these things?
[LG Revolution] Mr Frog:
Will this work for the stock v9 ROM rooted with CWM?
[LG Revolution] Dave51495:
My initial boot took 8 minutes. It had me worried!

EDIT: Still no boot logo on second boot. Also took 7 minutes that time.
[LG Revolution] The Kraken!:
Will this work with all roms, ie all versions of BO and stock?
[LG Revolution] I.M.famous XMAN:
In theory yes, but Idk if it will work on stock Rom. Just make a backup first. Iirc, a guy used it on his wife's stock esteem. Said he saw a tremendous improvement.

As far as removal, Idk. I'll get back with that info soon.

I have been using it for a few days now and I get fabulous Batt life. I do suffer from the no boot ani, but boot ups are faster than on a stock kernel. Just amazing. But remember, to give your phone time to settle before giving up. :) besides aroma is cool.
[LG Revolution] I.M.famous XMAN:
For stock Roms, you would need to enable init.d support. Without it, your init.d scripts will not run by themselves.

to enable init.d support in stock rooted roms, use a file browser and go to the etc folder. look for init.qcom.post_boot.sh and add '/system/etc/init.d/*' to the bottom of the file. Save and reboot. Enjoy.

*Edited. Forgot a letter. :)
[LG Revolution] I.M.famous XMAN:
OP updated for the 'no boot animation' issue. If you want to call it an issue. and to let you know, after enabling the boot ani I have not noticed any increase to the boot up time. In fact, sometimes my ani doesn't even get to loop before the lock screen shows up.

And for those that don't like the extra long boots, they will shorten up. Give your phone time to settle. the long boots are for the scripts configuring things. When you think about it, there are a lot of files that are tweaked (zipaligned, deodexed, etc...). the scripts are set up to optimize files that are not already optimized. So, the boot time will decrease. :) Don't get scared. It's only a phone. :D
[LG Revolution] kyledyr:
should that say "/system/etc/init.d/*"? it seems to be missing the t.
[LG Revolution] I.M.famous XMAN:
yep. damn auto correct. Thanks. Updating post.
[LG Revolution] iamjerry123:
I feel like this made my phone slower than faster.... \:
[LG Revolution] I.M.famous XMAN:
I thought the same thing at first. Give it a few days and a couple of reboots. idk. i like it
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] bekris56:
Hello everyone,

i have wt19i with JellySandwich 6.2.1 and rage kernel v3.2!i flashed earlier FOX XMP ICS rom and after that my touchscreen was not responding...in the screen where it says to write down the pin,i could only press the zero button and all the hardware keys work fine...!If anyone knows how to fix it please help.....
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mihahn:
Did you unlock bootloader on official way or via testpoint?

Flash the stockrom and see what happens...
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] bekris56:
I think that was via testpoint..i dont know for sure because one of my friends did it...i searched all similar posts but i cant use flashtool!it stuck on screen that says to plug in my phone!
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mihahn:
So you install the latest flashtool version. Afterwards you download the gingerbread (or ics) ftf for your device. You install all drivers from flashtool installation folder> drivers. Now you launch flashtool, click on the flash, select flashmode and choose the ftf. Now turn phone off, hold volume up and while holding plug in pc. Don't turn phone on, just connect while holding volume down. Flashtool will automaticly flash the ftf.

Just restart and see what happens ;)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] sandy7:
flashing another device rom to ur made this problem..bcz when u do it the the touch drivers are replaced screwing ur touch screen digitizer...

try flashing hybrom v16 GB of sk17i and flash to stock lww rom after that....

is it still dont work u have to replace ur touchscreen digitizer.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] bekris56:
I did it....still the same problem...!
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mihahn:
So you stuck there, on the latest flashtool build. Reinstall it and try again, it must work!
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] bekris56:
You mean to flash 2 times the same ftf?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mihahn:
Oh so you mean you have installed stock firmware and touch isn't working anyway? There are some threads about how to fix touchscreen with hybrom (like sandy7 said) ;)

Sent from my SK17i running Jelly Bean via CM10
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] bekris56:
if you have a link for hybrom v16 i would be thankfull to you!!and one more question,i must flash hybrom and let the phone boot?or no?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] LLoSER:
Hello, I have done the same with these two roms and I have the same problem. I can not operate the touchscreen phone. Please cant you help me?

Sorry for my english. I am Spanish.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] pitchblack5691:
How about flashing a custom kernel with cwm (flash again if you already have one) , remove memory card, don't try to boot into the Rom! Just boot into cwm wipe everything! (cache/dalvik/data/system/batterystats) literally wipe everything you could wipe . Then flash the generic firmware for your phone. I think that should do the trick.

hit thanks if I've helped!

sent from my smultron
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] LLoSER:
Hi, first thanks for your help.

But I've done what I mentioned twice and the touch screen is still not working. Can you think of any other solution?. thanks
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] sandy7:
search xda for the tut how to solve ur problem....

and hybrom link u can find it here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1879666
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] bekris56:
Thank you all for helping but i just fix it!!!!:D

I followed the steps from this post http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1773114 but i used rage kernel 2.7 and hybrom v12!not v10!!
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] LLoSER:
Hello, I have the same problem as you with the mini st15i. Could you tell me all the steps to make it work?

Thanks in advance.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] ndenk:
need help with my wt19i

i have the same problem too :crying: last night i've flashed wrong cusrom (should have known it for mini pro) but mine is wt19i and the touchscreen was never responding ever since. I've tried so many ways in i.e :

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1856334

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1927058

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1779023

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1721331

none worked for me. Not even partially :(. Been tried using rage kernel 2.6, 2.7, X-kernel, KrSH kernel. Hybrom v10, v12 minipro, v12 lww. but it just can't boot :confused: seems like i'm desperate right now. Do i have to keep flashing again and again? bcause i see some comments about just tried to keep flashing to their devices and sometime it could magically turn the touchscreen to work
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] hassan359:
Hybrom v12

I searched for hybrom v12 mini pro for about half an hour, if you know the right method and link kindly reply me asap and with full instructions. I am also Lww user and facing same touch screen issue.

I will appreciate your concern.

Thanks.:cowboy:
[Nexus 7 General] jacktownlane:
Google will not ship you a replacement tablet unless you have the money to pay for another tablet.

I have learned this the hard way.

I had the touch sensor issue and sent the tablet back, but since I don't have the money to hold on my debit card Google will not ship me my replacement tablet.

You read that right. I paid for a tablet, I have no tablet, Google won't give me my warranty-covered replacement until I find the cash for them to hold on to for a week.

I am the biggest Google fanboy I know IRL, but I am extremely mad right now and wanted to make sure everybody knows about this issue before buying the Nexus 7.

I bought the tablet on Sept 4th, maybe by October 26th I'll have enough money saved up to pay the ransom to actually hold my tablet in my hands.
[Nexus 7 General] Metallice:
Well no duh. They put a hold on the value of replacement tablet to make sure you return the old one. They need to make sure you have the funds to pay for the replacement should you fail to return the defective one. It's common practice.

I would have asked to speak with a supervisor as I would think they would let you send your tablet back first instead, and then after they receive the defective one they would ship you the replacement. That would eliminate the need for a hold on you card.
[Nexus 7 General] jacktownlane:
That is exactly what I thought. I asked them if I could return the tablet first and have them send the replacement without holding another $199, I have an email in which they agree with that scenario.

The problem is, they won't do it.

I sent the tablet back, UPS confirmed they received it on the 4th. Google themselves confirm they have it.

Even knowing all of this, the "manager" I was able to speak with told me the same thing the rep told me. There is no way to get around having the money held. Nobody has authorization to get around that in the system, it is just built in.

So yes, I sent the tablet back to get around this charge, and they still insist on charging me.
[Nexus 7 General] ncguy68:
The OP said they sent the original tablet back...if Google already has the tablet back they should not need to put a hold on a second tablet.
[Nexus 7 General] ExploreMN:
What you're describing is an advanced replacement. They send you a replacement tablet and put a hold for the value on a credit or debit card until they receive your defective one.

If you can't do that for some reason, then you need to process a standard RMA without advanced replacement. In this case you send your tablet in and go without a tablet until they get around to fixing it.

If you run into a problem, ask for a supervisor. Be polite and explain the situation. If you act like an entitled ass you will likely find roadblocks and problems in getting things solved.
[Nexus 7 General] atoy74:
What he said. This is standard procedure for an advanced replacement. If you're saying that they are currently in possession of your old tablet and they still need to charge you for another... doesn't make any sense.

Maybe there's something off in the timing/terminology. I'd call back again. Otherwise, they need to return your original transaction money.
[Nexus 7 General] jacktownlane:
I think I was courteous even when I asked for the supervisor. The reason I am so angry is support said I could do it like this so I wouldn't have the money held. Then they said there is no way to do it without the money being held. That is all in my email communication.

Then they told me to contact ASUS to resolve the problem because there was nothing they could do. I asked them what could ASUS do when I've already sent the tablet back to Google. Their response was give us more of your money to hold on to and we'll be glad to send you an "advance replacement device."

We own 2 GNexs, a cheap Samsung Android phone for our son, a Google TV, an Acer 100, and some day a Nexus 7. I am as fanboy as it gets. I say all that to make the point that I really wanted this resolved nicely but Google is really sticking it to me.
[Nexus 7 General] alkemist80:
Sounds like a major case of miscommunication somewhere, even though they have received the tablet back. If you can't work it out with the supervisor, then talk to the department manager. There is obviously no need for them to place a hold if they have it back already. The only other scenario I can see is that it's been hard coded into the system that they can't override. Did you get an RMA to send it back?

Don't know if you have any credit cards but that is another way to do it. It won't be a hold on your cash and it essentially will just be well, a hold on virtual money.
[Nexus 7 General] jacktownlane:
Google stopped communicating with me. I told them I felt like this had moved beyond bad customer service and into customer mistreatment and if I couldn't get the tablet I paid for without putting up money I don't have then I would file a complaint with my state's attorney general.

They said I had made a "legal threat" and at that point would only keep repeating the URL for Google legal. The new manager I had wouldn't repeat her name or give me any sort of reference number.

I don't have a credit card. I saved up money to buy this tablet. I don't have the money to let them hold even if the principle didn't deeply disturb me.
[Nexus 7 General] jacktownlane:
Alright so I took the advice you guys gave me and gave them a call back.

I got a new person and it took him 2 minutes of looking at my account to just give me the full refund that the original rep denied me. Before they weren't going to refund the shipping charge, only the price plus tax.

So I'm waiting for my money to come back so I can try again! Hopefully next week I'll have my Nexus 7!

The difference between the new person that took my call and the old person was like night and day.

But the new person did confirm with me that it is hard-coded in their system that they absolutely cannot under any circumstances provide you a replacement device without first holding the money on the card you bought the device with originally.

So my original "Buyer Beware" warning still stands. With as many problems as people have been having with their Nexus 7's you should make sure you have double the purchase price before buying this tablet to make sure you can get your replacement if anything goes sideways.
[Nexus 7 General] Ravynmagi:
I think Google is trying... but they are new at supporting hardware and are making mistakes. I think it may take more than a week for you to get your refund though, sounds like even that process is pretty messed up.
[Nexus 7 General] andreww88:
You said 'with as many problems as people are having', when I have not heard of many and mine is running great and no defects I have seen. Hmm....
[Nexus 7 General] jacktownlane:
He said 14 days for a refund after they receive the device and they received it on the 4th. So I should have my money next week if not my tablet.

The problem I had was with the touch sensors after running any mid- to high-end game. I see other people on XDA with the same issue. It only goes away if you restart, and it is a hardware issue, not software.
[Nexus 7 General] Ravynmagi:
Yeah, 14 days is what they tell everyone. But it sounds like most experiences I see mentioned here, say it's taking about 2 months to get a refund. I've tried to find someone that actually got a refund in a normal amount of time, and so far no one has come up yet.
[Nexus 7 General] saryu:
don't buy it from google website, if there is anything, you can only communicate through online/phone.

buy it from somewhere else like staples, gamestop, etc. If there is something to happen, you can bring back the product with the recipe to the original shop. Another thing is, if you did something wrong, it's easier to mask it because the store clerk usually have little understanding in it.
[Nexus 7 General] le0.br4zuc4:
I purchased a new linksys router and after 2 months it stopped working. They sent me a replacement BUT they charged me the value of the device to make sure I would send the one that stopped working back to them. I don't see what the big problem with putting down a deposit.
[Nexus 7 General] maztahbr:
The Op hasn't the money to spent
[Nexus 7 General] kevinchen1102:
see?this is why i love apple!
[Nexus 7 General] Mach3.2:
Nobody needs you here, go troll your Apple forum.

Beamed from my Grouper.