yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] frankcilo:
I have created a script with this values, and put it in system/etc/init.d:

#!/system/bin/sh

sleep 60

#UV_BEGIN#

echo "1313 1263 1188 1163 1138 1113 1088 1038 988 963 938 913 863 838 813 788 768" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/UV_mV_table

echo "54 108 160 266 350 440 533 640 733 800" > /sys/devices/system/gpu/freq_table

echo 54 775 > /sys/devices/system/gpu/volt_table

echo 108 825 > /sys/devices/system/gpu/volt_table

echo 160 825 > /sys/devices/system/gpu/volt_table

echo 266 875 > /sys/devices/system/gpu/volt_table

echo 350 925 > /sys/devices/system/gpu/volt_table

echo 440 975 > /sys/devices/system/gpu/volt_table

echo 533 1050 > /sys/devices/system/gpu/volt_table

echo 640 1125 > /sys/devices/system/gpu/volt_table

echo 733 1175 > /sys/devices/system/gpu/volt_table

echo 800 1225 > /sys/devices/system/gpu/volt_table

echo 160 > /sys/devices/system/gpu/min_freq

echo 533 > /sys/devices/system/gpu/max_freq

#Customize the following 6 lines for mem_VOLT

echo "110110 147147 176176 293176 293220 440220" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/busfreq/mif_volt_table

echo 110110 887500 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/busfreq/mif_volt_table

echo 147147 900000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/busfreq/mif_volt_table

echo 176176 912500 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/busfreq/mif_volt_table

echo 293176 937500 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/busfreq/mif_volt_table

echo 293220 937500 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/busfreq/mif_volt_table

echo 440220 987500 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/busfreq/mif_volt_table

#Customize the following 4 lines for int_VOLT

echo "110110 147147 176176 293176 293220 440220" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/busfreq/int_volt_table

echo 110110 887500 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/busfreq/int_volt_table

echo 147147 900000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/busfreq/int_volt_table

echo 176176 912500 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/busfreq/int_volt_table

echo 293176 912500 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/busfreq/int_volt_table

echo 293220 987500 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/busfreq/int_volt_table

echo 440220 987500 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/busfreq/int_volt_table

#ABB

echo "800" > /sys/devices/system/abb/arm/arm_slice_1_volt

echo "850" > /sys/devices/system/abb/arm/arm_slice_2_volt

echo "900" > /sys/devices/system/abb/arm/arm_slice_3_volt

echo "950" > /sys/devices/system/abb/arm/arm_slice_4_volt

echo "700000" > /sys/devices/system/abb/arm/arm_slice_2_freq

echo "1200000" > /sys/devices/system/abb/arm/arm_slice_3_freq

echo "850" > /sys/devices/system/abb/g3d/g3d_slice_1_volt

echo "900" > /sys/devices/system/abb/g3d/g3d_slice_2_volt

echo "440" > /sys/devices/system/abb/g3d/g3d_slice_2_freq

echo "950" > /sys/devices/system/abb/g3d/g3d_slice_3_volt

echo "900" > /sys/devices/system/abb/int/int_slice_1_volt

echo "950" > /sys/devices/system/abb/int/int_slice_2_volt

echo "900" > /sys/devices/system/abb/mif/mif_slice_1_volt

echo "950" > /sys/devices/system/abb/mif/mif_slice_2_volt

#UV_END#
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] MarionCast:
Agreed. Not all of us have the time and the level of understanding that is required. Will just wait and see I guess. For now, UV alone has been great for me though. :). I just don't want to brick my baby just because I misunderstood something.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] iba21:
2..
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] mupel:
yep, because simply I'd already had a great battery drain rate.. (1-1.6%/hr), and I dont think that tweaking ABB will bring further success...

but I really appreciate anyone who shares their success with ABB tweaks..
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pakalrtb:
Playstore wants to update Stweaks, but the updated version is dated December 2012. I am assuming that the version we have is a custom one made by andreilux and we should keep it.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ppn7:
The 36.3 is a stable version or i should take the 36.2?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] t-r-e:
No , the update only remove donation button .
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] McLaren__F1:
They both are stable..
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] amg009:
Using this kernel for a long time.. Great work Andrei..

Some feature request

-touch wake feature

-some other ui for kernel than stweaks(trickster mod)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] jasonchen:
+ 1 for touch wake feature.

it's nice to have, as well as the dual boot feature, if possible. :laugh:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] insanchen:
In your init.d, you set cpu 200mhz for 768mV. I tried your script, put it in my init.d folder and restarted then I checked my 200mhz voltage is 763mV, not 768mV. It's that normal?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] xcxa23:
yup. its normal.. for uv, the value is +/- 25 or 13/12.u can change the value to 763 no problem

the value for uv suppose to be 725, 738, 750, 763, 775 788, 800 and so on.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] frankcilo:
Yes, 763 is the right value, thanks for letting me know,but does not change anything, because if the system would take it anyway with the right value of 763
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] darkchazz:
Lag fix please! :)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] bervin:
[MENTION=4167023]AndreiLux[/MENTION]

I find that your iteration of the pegasuq governor is more draining and goes to higher clock speeds than the stock one. Is it possible to include stock pegasuq governor as a option in your next release?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] hameerabbasi:
Using ABB with sklchan's voltages actually seems to drain more battery than just plain old undervolting. Would anyone care to confirm?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] sklchan:
What your old uv setting values? Don't copy blindly my uv values for CPU if yours original is lower then mine, just start tweaking using your best cpu uv setting and then fine tune your ABB setting... ;)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] SandeepEmekar:
I switched to another Kernel due to this. :(

I hope developer won't ignore this issue and all our requests. :(
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] hameerabbasi:
I'm benchmarking against all your values (slightly adjusted, 1704 -> 1275 mV, slice 1 -> 850 mV) against killflaker's values here (Column Q), with slice 1-4 at the default 750 mV. Quick question, should we aim for RBB until 800 MHz, FBB at higher freqs, or just upper the ABB of each slice until it's stable, in which case, FBB/RBB switchover frequency can vary?

Edit: A quick response would be highly appreciated, anxious to start testing. :D

Edit 2: Or should we reduce? :confused:

Edit 3: So we should increase. Scratch Edit 2. Aim for RBB at lower freqs, FBB at higher but no defined range. Note to self: Read OP before posting. :silly:

I used to face lags with alpha 35 with default settings, so I tweaked them. Lags have been considerably reduced since alpha 36.2, but I still have to tweak just a little for a completely lag-free environment.

If you don't like it, play with the settings, or choose another kernel. The dev is taking time away from his personal life to create this for us, don't disrespect him.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ppn7:
Which lag do you refer? I have some lag too on some applications like message and contact or settings or when I'm scrolling wherever. Is it that you means?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Simone:
What lag do you guys mean? I do not experience lag what so ever.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] rsalan:
Yes that's what he means, compared to stock kernel.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] EarlZ:
Good thing i dont have lags in this kernel vs the stock.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] SandeepEmekar:
Just open any app like "Settings" you will see the freezing lag.

When I do multi-tasking between more than 2 apps it increases the lag. :(
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] quijote1:
I'm using this kernel just the way it came and don't have any lags... Or any other complaint for that matter.

Samsung Galaxy Note 2

Hawkish Extreme MC3v2

Perseus Alpha 36.2

Apex Launcher
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] xcxa23:
for those who claimed they had lag, go to stweak, under cpu scaling, raise the frequency for responsiveness to 700mhz and frequency step to 48%

this will most likely solve ur problem.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] xonone:
For my settings I am currently using:

Sampling rate: 25000us

Up threshold: 90%

Freq for Responsiveness: 500mhz

I get only alittle bit of lag in power saving mode. NO lag without power saving.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] darkchazz:
Stuttering while scrolling in the touchwiz launcher. And most app UIs. Especially when first touching the screen after letting the cpu dial down to 200mhz. There's no such lag in the stock kernel.

You can also clearly see the stutter while multitasking between apps. The app switch animation stutters half the time... As does the app opening animation.

Some people are not sensitive to such frame rate dips and stutters and so will deny this issue. But it's there.

Setting the "frequency for responsiveness = 700mhz" makes a small improvement but nowhere near the stock kernel.

That's why we've been asking for weeks now for the cpu governor and hotplug settings equivalent to the stock kernel. But no reply whatsoever except for stuff like "Sad it's only you I got no lags".

I think lag is an exaggerated word for this. stutter is more suitable.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] shadowlabs9:
Hi,

No, You're not alone...

I'm facing the same problem...

But with Nova launcher that feeling is minimized...

Appart form the changes above, I also have set the GPU for 2D under settings

And decreased the GPU up threshold to 60 in STweaks

but lets wait for Andri magic...

Best regards
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] manup85cupra:
+1. for me the lag is quite high and i go back everytime to Adama Kernel: actually the most smooth in GN2 Kernel Threads
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] SandeepEmekar:
Thank you all for confirming the stutter/lag.

I'm not the only one who has been complaining. :D
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] quijote1:
Maybe because I use the Apex Launcher I don't notice any stuttering...

Samsung Galaxy Note 2

Hawkish Extreme MC3v2

Perseus Alpha 36.2

Apex Launcher
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] t4d73:
I'm on the us sprint variant using perseus as well and never notice and stuttering at all. Wonder why you guy's do.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ppn7:
For exemple when i scroll on "CPU Spy plus" i can see the lag/ low frame rate.

Even if i up frequency responsive to 700mhz and threslhold at 48%

---------- Post added at 12:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:53 AM ----------

this has decrease your battery life?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] darkchazz:
That is a completely different thing from what we are talking about actually.

In your case, some apps do not take advantage of gpu acceleration by default and you need to force it in the developer options.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] shadowlabs9:
Hi,

As for the Stuttering, maybe this can can point us the direction...

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2079311

Best regards
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] EarlZ:
I know what sutter/lag is and i dont have it on this kernel. Maily because i have the responsiveness at 700 when i strartes using this kernel. Its bot suttering more than the stock one. But if it can be fixed then its a good thing.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ppn7:
It's done for gpu forced on developers tools. But still have freeze and low frame rate. But i really goy some freeze in general using when i start to scroll in any situation.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] xonone:
Slightly it seems but its about the same really. ill keep on testing it.

Sent from my Nexus 7
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] sklchan:
here, i attached my perseus setting file which stable since 27 Apr with zero SOD... remember i'm on ASV1 group and my perseus setting might not suit you as my major aim is on power saving then smoothness and the setting is use along with Android Tuner and Llama... these setting will only activate 2 cores when Power Saving mode activated (1000MHz barrier set at the hotplug set the 3rd/4th core not to be activating when CPU freq<1100MHz) and this will render minor laggyness (which I'm fine with it) USE AT YOUR OWN RISK!!! ;)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] wyndcryst25:
NOBODY BEATS PERSEUS KERNEL!!!

This is my own story. :)

1st cycle after flashing Perseus, rebooted 6x and have a very bad signal (I'm always on the road).

Default settings in STweaks except AUDIO.

PS: Been on other kernel but I'm having issues.

Issues encountered: None

Limitations: Myself
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] FUSIONdev:
Perseus is a GREAT kernel, but I think that makes phone less reactive. I tried it many times (switching back to stock) and I found a bit of lag with perseus, expecially with samsung power saving on. Maybe because the stock kernel is set capped to 1.1 GHz (perseus 1 GHz) and most of time the fourth core is off... Pegasus it's set more like a conservative governor...
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] wyndcryst25:
Thanks Sir for enlightening me about CPU core capping between stock and Perseus Kernel but I experience no lags even with power saving on. I'm using Nova launcher with Xposed framework mods.

Correct me if I am wrong Sir but i guess we have all different hardware reactions to Kernel or Mods, some might be good to others but some may encounter issues (other issues probably are user issues).

I have tried other Kernels, even close to stock kernel, but i encountered issues.

Cheers! :)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] hameerabbasi:
I can confirm after flashing back to RedPill that this has more lags with more or less EXACTLY the same settings, even if I tweak them to be more towards performance. I don't mean any disrespect, Andrei. :( But the lag issue has to be fixed.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] FUSIONdev:
I use nova too, it's much smoother than touchiz launcher. I'm not saying that it's incredibly laggy, but I can feel the difference between stock and perseus in reactivity....

The difference is greater when power saving is on... with stock kernel I forget to have the power saving on (I mean: I have to check it on the panel, and I always keep it on, because the phone is really reactive) ... with perseus the phone seems braked... and I think it's the cpu throttling thresold that is too much aggressive.

With stock kernel I feel like having an interactive governor... with perseus conservative.

Battery life, instead, is really improved. I can see the difference in screen on time.

Another thing: the screen controls are great... the white is really white, and I don't understand why samsung doesn't give us that calibration by default.

They made a nice work on whites with S4... in Note 2 the white is bluish and as demostraded by Andrei: our panel is able to show it!!! :D
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] tuxonhtc:
Smooth as butter here. Absolutely no lag at all.

Set Frequency for responsiveness under Cpu Scaling tab of stweaks to 800 mhz. Does that solve the lag?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] rsalan:
This has been suggested over and over but no, it does not. Like someone said earlier, it's not really lag but more over a studdering when switching between screens and opening apps.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] tuxonhtc:
Weird, absolutely no lag here. Not in the app drawer, notification bar, launching apps, anywhere. The only slight lag is just a few seconds immediately after booting, but I guess that's normal. I mean if it is an issue with the kernel then everyone should experience it right? :confused:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pepe2909:
Totally agree with you !
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] EarlZ:
Those claiming lag, maybe you guys can either stick with the stock kernel or show a video comparing both so that the developer can fix the issue if there is anything that is needed to be fixed.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] hameerabbasi:
Increased frequency for responsiveness, which makes it better but doesn't solve it. Played with the up threshold, the GPU up threshold, CPU hotplug settings, making each more progressively performance oriented, but nothing completely eliminates the micro lags or stutter, as it's been called.

Tried RedPill with more or less the same settings, even a little more battery oriented, and there's way less stuttering.

It's most visible during vertical scrolling in long lists.

The after boot thing is there, but it continues a long time after boot.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] wyndcryst25:
So i am not the only one experiencing no lag issues. :)

We are subscribing/viewing this thread (or other custom kernel thread) because we prefer custom kernel over stock.

We want to use custom kernel because of the advantages over stock.

We take the risk in flashing because we want our phone to be more powerful or customized it based on our personal preferences.

Conclusion, we learn everything thru testing, experimenting and taking risks.

Time work now, have a safety and productive day ahead of you guys!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] hameerabbasi:
I'd be glad to. Point me to an app that does that, for I don't have a good secondary camera to use.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] doubledragon5:
Excuse my ignorance, but what is the latest kernel for the note2 running MC2. For Sprint. Thanks.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] theory_87:
Flash 33.4 and is better than 36.3 in term of stuttering...
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] :
I asked this before but did not get a response back, but is it possible to calibrate the s pen?

I recently got a replacement s pen and the tip is off by 1 to 3mm so it's more or less impossible to utilize the note features. Just wanted to know if there are any documentation inside the kernel sources about the digitizer since there's already a way to update the drivers, modify the screen tone, adjust leds and all of that good stuff.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] t4d73:
Try here:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1975262

---------- Post added at 02:42 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:41 AM ----------

That link was meant for you. Sorry guys.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] doubledragon5:
Thank you will flash now. LoL
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] tuxonhtc:
Wow, absolutely no lags here after changing responsiveness. I have no idea, hopefully Andrei will look into it.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] aegeuss:
Andrei Hi,

After reading the article here, I wonder if it's possible for a superb dev like you to implement LITTLE MP (HMP) scheduler to our kernel? It would be a huge improvement if possible and requires your high level of skill.

Thanks and regards.

edit: For some additional info, please have a look at this thread. May be it's not possible to use HMP scheduler since we only have 4 cores but may be it might be possible to alter the HMP scheduler for 4 cores.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] jsompis:
+1 for touchwake.

Regards.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] wyndcryst25:
Hi guys!

Just want to share.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] EarlZ:
What is touchwake ?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] GonDr:
Touchwake = wake ur mobile via touch screen, no need to use power or home, but i guess it will drain battery.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] antt00:
Some people have more than enough battery to drain. So it would be nice to make it an option.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] doubledragon5:
You must have it tweaked big time. I have no clue how it is done so leaving everything stock settings
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] EarlZ:
From what I've read its either that or the capacitive buttons

True, with me moderate usage, I even have between 30-40% battery left for the day. I always charge my phone when I sleep so I have that much to spare for this cool feature.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Miguel-:
You having the micro stutter, check your GPU min.freq and test if upping it helps with the problem.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] cashwei:
The Perseus kernel can reduce voltage, the theory will save electricity, but I've heard that recently the stock kernel also power? So tangled, do not know which is better.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ppn7:
You means kernel stock can undervolt too??
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] tbong777:
Same here. I never worry about battery use and always have plenty of juice at the end of the day when I charge and I use my phone. The Note 2 is the for Samsung device were really don't use my extra battery and don't need it all. I bought the extra battery out of habit before I even owned the phone.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] MojoManagement:
hey there

just flashed 9mega v16 with newest perseus and flashes simplistic framework, enabling crt-off-effect does nothing... any hints?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] zephyrus17:
Try to set the front buffer to 200ms on stweak's screen tab
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] nobnut:
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=33143719&postcount=344
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] garyd9:
Is there a sysfs interface for finding the current GPU frequency? (don't see anything in /sys/devices/system/gpu)

Thanks

Gary
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Bholwell:
25.2 working here for me, WiFi and everything else Ive tried so far work!

Thanks again!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] nyarnon:
Rocks. Thanks.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ravenrocha:
GPU overclock

Hi,

is there any GPU app that can control de frequencies and voltages for this kernel? Like SetCPU for the CPU?

Thanks,

Hugo
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] suman_pal78:
25.2 NO ISSUE AT ALL!!!!

Wiped cache & davlik cache and flash 25.2....using omega 4.1

Thanks ...all working great..great kernel and yes...there is no pixel salad atall during boot

Great support And Great development Perseus kernel chief.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] frankcilo:
I'm testing v25.2, all seems good!

Only one thing:

I can not change the thresholds of the GPU, I would like to set it to 90 - 60 or at least I would like to do some tests, but it seems that the parameters of the thresholds can not be modified:confused:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] nobnut:
Read the changelog. Previous GPU scripts won't work anymore.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] AndreiLux:
Down differential cannot be higher than (99 - up value). 90 60 won't be accepted as a valid value. I set it up like this so we can't input stupid values in that don't make sense, it's a differential not a down threshold itself.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] garyd9:
In the change that sets the current for misc charging to 900mA, will this impact charging from the wireless charging contacts inside the back of the device? If so, there might be a fire risk if too much current is being pulled from an inductive coil inside the battery cover.

Any chance of making the charging current values configurable via sysfs?

Thanks

Gary
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] AndreiLux:
Hmm I didn't think of that, I'll have to check it. I also raised "wpc". I'll report on it later.

___

If US users of T-Mobile, Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and Japanese users of DoCoMo want a port for their devices they need to send me an image of their stock kernels so I can compare the ramfs differences between them.