yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] kabychow:
Why this ROM's navigation bar seems big compare with our Paranoid 2.99? :confused:
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] filosofi_killms:
you're welcome :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] filosofi_killms:
for navigation settings can be set in the paranoid setting .. :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
Any bug ? :confused:
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] filosofi_killms:
please read changelog..
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
Oops...

Im sory :o
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] filosofi_killms:
oke no problem
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
Permission to download and try it bro.. :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
After i tried going to my review.. :) thanks before :thumbup:
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] filosofi_killms:
I will wait :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
Oke bro
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] filosofi_killms:
yup
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
wow very2 amazing bro..
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] filosofi_killms:
thanks :laugh:
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
This rom added supercharge?
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] filosofi_killms:
no..

if you make supercharge try instal manual..

in here

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=991276
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
Whether to update busybox? :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] filosofi_killms:
no..

busybox for supercharge include in this rom brow :cowboy:
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
Oke thanks..

Im testing now.. :D
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
:D
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
Hemmmm your gapps is flash with cwm?
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] filosofi_killms:
yeah it should pass CWM
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
Okay thanks bro
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] filosofi_killms:
you're welcome :o
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
Use script supercharge very fast :D

Thanks for your tutor :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] filosofi_killms:
indeed .. she made more quickly
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
Yeah brow...

Wkakakakakajaja :D
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] filosofi_killms:
btw please dont pm me...

just post in here..

thanks
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
Oops..

Im sory..

Okay
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] filosofi_killms:
sip
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
I wait for the next release :fingers-crossed:
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] potasium.nitrat:
ayo mas bro, experiment lagi,,, klo bisa naik ke JB :laugh:

semangat mas bro...;)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
Agree with you :D
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] abeeennng:
HEI,This awesome rom, fast and smooth :)

but, when i restore data from my TB, all app can't work with good

i'm using TB 5.2 until 5.7 still same

so i'try to download again on PS

maybe i'm wrong or maybe it's bug from this rom?

but, i like this rom so much

Unyu, unyu :p
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
unyu2 :laugh:
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] kabychow:
Flashed this ROM b4 and all process keep force close I think this is bcoz of I didn't go pristine :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
seems to work well :(
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] potasium.nitrat:
i have seem problem with u bro ...

unyu - unyu too wkwkkwkw :p
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] abeeennng:
toos, wkwk

yeahh, unyu Klikers :p
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
Wkakakakakakakaka :D
[Asus Transformer TF700] gybema:
I like my new Asus Transformer Infinity, but not as much as I love my Samsung Galaxy sII. It bugs me that it appears that a lot of apps are much smoother/faster in loading data on the SII than on the Infinity, while the former is a year older with a slower CPU.

Does anyone has the same experience?

And what could be the cause?

On both devices I use almost the same apps, have the same accounts installed and i use the same wifi connection. My sII still uses ICS and my infinty JB (which in my opinion is much better then before), Both unrooted.

When I run the usual benchmarks (quadrant, antutu, browsermark), I get the scores you would expect: Infinity scores clearly higher than the SII and conform the results that other users report. Internet speed tests do also give expected results,

I'm experiencing the following. A lot of apps that load some data from the web (news apps for example) show a delay of 1 or 2 seconds, while the SII often loads the data instantly. Browsing on the SII gives me a smooth experience, while browsing on the Infinity often results in a couple of seconds that the tablet is unresponsive when the page is not loaded completely.

This effect is the strongest in the Stumbleupon app, which probably has an inferior browser built-in, but my SII still loads the new pages really fast. The infinity shows a lot of unresponsiveness in Stumbleupon and it results in a lot of ANR popups.

The ANR popups are not so prevalant in other apps. This did happen a lot more with ICS. On my SII I almost never get an ANR.

I understand that the tablet needs to render for a much higher resolution and that the tablet has some issues with IO performance. But can this make such a difference? Could it be that most apps are so terribly designed for tablets, that the tablet needs a lot of CPU time to upscale, which causes unresponiveness?

Or is it just my tablet?
[Asus Transformer TF700] dLo GSR:
yes.
[Asus Transformer TF700] mencho:
You are not alone. I also have a galaxy s2,and it's a lot faster than this tablet.
[Asus Transformer TF700] huy_lonewolf:
It is not that surprising. My Sensation also feel faster and more reliable than my Infinity, guess it is just right that the S2 is much faster. And yes, the resolution does matter a lot. Imagine running Skyrim or Crysis II a 1024x768 resolution versus at 1920x1080, the difference in frame rates will blow you away.
[Asus Transformer TF700] Thats OK:
Yup,

Most games and apps are designed for phones not tablets.

Applications for phones driving that big 'ole 1920X1200 screen with a 12 core GPU just ain't going to respond the same as the junior sized screens at a much lower resolution.

Just wait when the apps catch on to the HD wave there will be many happy campers.

Takes time...
[Asus Transformer TF700] senatormimi:
Asus uses a tegra and samsung uses exynos. The exynos/malli processor/GPU seems to perform much better than tegra despite that tegra is made by nvidia. on paper the GFLOPS and toals MADs produced by the Exynos is higher.

The screen also is a factor as FHD screen takes more time to push all the pixels on a 10.1 screen compared to a 4.3.

Architecture of chipset as well

Manufacture also plays a part. Their coding and software implementation to make the hardware and software work together. Samsung does better in this case. ASUS is always pushing updates.
[Asus Transformer TF700] htcplussony:
Its not just the Infinity as this was the first thing I noticed when I got the Transformer Prime vs my S2. Does resolutions play a role? Maybe a bit more in the Infinity's case but the Prime and TF300 had resolutions that's not too far off from the Galaxy Nexus but the latter with 2 less cores sure did better than the Asus tablets.
[Asus Transformer TF700] Unibrow:
Most of it is the cheap crappy internal memory Asus decided to use for their flagship device, some of it's the higher resolution.
[Asus Transformer TF700] opentoe:
My wife's apple ipad 3 with the high resolution runs smooth like a baby's butt. I could only wish my infinity ran that smooth. Since complaints aren't only coming from me now the proof is right here...this tablet was made without thinking. Basically Asus wanted a great tablet on paper to jump ahead of everyone, ON PAPER, but in reality it is a pretty bad device for such a large amount of money. Better off with a cheaper laptop with an SSD drive in it really.
[Asus Transformer TF700] buhohitr:
Not to be funny, but my droid charge (2 years old, first samsung lte phone) is faster and smoother than tf700! Asus build a biggest giant cruise ship and forgot to plug a hole in the bottom of the ship!
[Asus Transformer TF700] ShadowLea:
As any gamer knows, higher resolution means more resources needed, which means a lower frames-per-second rate. It simply has to render more.

Your S2 has a resolution of 480 x 800, your TF700 a resolution of 1920x1280. In terms of resource difference between those two, it's pretty much the difference between running Minesweeper and running Skyrim.

Add to that the fact pretty much 99% of the apps are made for phones, and in most cases specifically the Galaxy series, and it's no surprise they run better on a small phone they're optimized for than on a large full HD tablet that most app-developers don't even consider.
[Asus Transformer TF700] maedox:
The storage device is a piece of crap, there's nothing wrong with the graphics performance. Every single user experience issue with this tablet is down to data not getting read/written fast enough from/to storage. It's as simple as that.
[Asus Transformer TF700] thunderger:
Every application that uses "RAM" is subjective as fast as at my SGS2 (runnig CM9). But the i/o perfomance at stock ROM on my TF700 is really bad. With Browser2RAM surfing is a lot snapier but still not as snappy as at SGS2. Hopefully CM10 at TF700 works as much as possible around this storage issues.

Don't forget that the TF700T has the fastest RAM of all android devices that are on sale at the moment. But it has the slowest eMMC storage, too. :(
[Asus Transformer TF700] okantomi:
As far as the browser goes, use stock browser and if you are rooted, 1st look for app browser2ram and sideload it (and follow all instructions in thread dedicated to it), then (or for anyone else not rooted) type about:debug into browser address box, hit enter, then go to settings (three small vertcal dots in upper right hand corner of screen) and choose debug menu. Check the box next to Enable CPU Upload Pathand then close it. It speeds up the browser by a lot. I'm only using the stock browser now and I'm very satisfied with its performance.

The other suggestion I have for you that feel unhappy with the TF700's performance in general, is really consider unlocking, flashing a custom recovery (I highly recommend TWRP) and a rooted custom ROM, especially the CleanROM Ultra Light Edition v1.3. This JellyBean stock-based ROM is so fast and smooth and functional, you will wonder why you waited so long to have the device you had imagined. I kid you not. I've tried all the ROMs available for this device, and though they all have their strong points, for someone looking for a better than stock experience, where everything works, right now, this one's the best and it gets even better with each update. And this is just the beginning of wonderful development for the Infinity. This is honestly, a superb machine. We owe it to ourselves to take full advantage of it.
[Asus Transformer TF700] rikc:
If you're running stock it's slow. If you optimise it it's pretty damn fast. Had mine lying next to an iPad 3 and they are on the same level. How to do it? Disable (a lot) of unneeded apps and use the right software (Firefox Aurora or the above mentioned Browser2Ram)
[Asus Transformer TF700] htcplussony:
That's not much of a win considering the ipad 3 has a higher resolution with 2 less cpu cores and running 600mhz slower.
[Asus Transformer TF700] zenaxe:
Yup. This. The screen is a minor thing. If the ASUS engineers had not selected subpar parts for the internal SD, this thing would have absolute bleeding edge performance on every front. As it is, it often shows signs of brilliance but also has some limitations due to the system bottleneck. Your impression of the device user experience will depend heavily on your use model (and its associated memory footprint). The vast majority of issues/discussions wrt to this device basically come down to this one thing.

Barring some very serious OS hacking (ala the effort to allow external SD to replace internal) all the TF tabs will ALWAYS be limited by memory bandwidth. It's a hardware limitation. Either you can live with it or you can't. Too bad. Now that JB is here and the OS is finally decent/stable, this tab is one bad cost cutting measure away from being the undisputed best in class device in the industry. <shrug>

I'm not browsing very frequently and when I do, they are not heavy multimedia sites, so for me, the TF's certainly a really good user experience and I love the device. Games are great now that the driver bug is fixed for example. It's slightly frustrating knowing that the tab could have been amazing on EVERY front if they had spent another fifty cents on the memory... but that's life. I'll be happy if they just continue to support/stabilize/enhance the firmware. The hardware is what it is.
[Asus Transformer TF700] okantomi:
Well, I understand that the gpu is better and the whole ios thing is completely optimised for browsing, so yeah, it is kind of a good comparison in terms of user experience.
[Asus Transformer TF700] amenic:
This!!!

My HTC Evo 4g LTE has more consistent performance than my TF700T....

It's kind of frustrating really and the fact that my daughter's ipad is ALWAYS smooth bothers the hell out of me...

Is this the way these things are designed or do I have a lemon on my hands?

The fact that there are articles instructing people that they can buy a $30 SD card and move their /data mount to the external micro SD card tells me this is a design issue...

There's nothing more frustrating than tapping the screen and not being able to tell if you mis tapped or if the tablet is IO locked and in a 'wait' state. and it happens way too damned much.

I'm not doing anything special.... all I can say is that I'm running a lot of apps and perhaps this is the problem (I've restricted background process to 4 and disabling all animations and am now using APEX launcher to even disable all animations + the wallpaper).

Max free RAM at any time is around ~250 MB...

I want to show this thing off but everytime I pull it out it's performing like **** and cache cleaning or rebooting doen't seem to help either...

Also to add - post JB I DID perform a factory reset as well. I've installed about 130 apps.
[Asus Transformer TF700] dlokey22:
Just curious, how does tf700 compare to other android tablets? Is it a a lot slower or less smooth? It one thing to compare it to phones. I want to know how it compares to a Samsung note 10.1.
[Asus Transformer TF700] gybema:
Thanks for convincing me to root my device and install browser2ram. This does make a tremendous difference in browsing experience on this tablet. Everyone should use it.
[Asus Transformer TF700] barrymah:
Isn't that a hell of commentary?? I don't feel like/ feel that competent to root, just for this purpose.

For me the stock browser delivers 90% of the page and then takes 5 secs or so to deliver the rest - is that the base problem??

Just wanted a confirmation, late arrival in this thread.

If so I'll just have to be patient, won't I?? and no touch the screen where I get the 'not responding' box
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] studelube:
View attachment 1388731

Hey guys. Just woundering if anyone can explain to me why my network displays '@@@@@@@@' anyone have any idea or how to resolve it. Just updated my S3 to 4.1.1 and thats what i got.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] IOIDroid:
Very good question, what network are you suppose to be on ?? Have you tried a reboot of the device ?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mikep99:
are you on Orange / EE?

See http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1928257
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] IOIDroid:
I was going to suggest the same thing that is the reason for the network question :)
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] studelube:
I am yes. Is that why iys doing it? When i go into select prefered network, EE is on the list. Ive pressed it but still says @@@@@@@ :(
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] IOIDroid:
This may be the case until the official JB Release comes out. But I would proably try the suggestions in the thread that has been mentioned.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] studelube:
Thanks mate. Will do!
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] IOIDroid:
I have looked into it for you some more and in the actual Rom file for the Carrier Label there is no entry for EE so when an official release is released I guess they will patch it :)
[Verizon Droid Charge] spezticle:
I started with stock at FP5

Used Odin to flash clockworkmod recovery.

Used clockworkmod recovery to install Tweaked3

then installed Superuser-3.2-RC3-arm-signed.zip and su-bin-3.1.1-arm-signed.zip

and rebooted the phone.

I used the app root checker. it says congratulations you have root access.

Then install terminal emulator from google play

i type "su" and everything works fine.

but when I use ES File explorer and try to enable root features the Superuser dialog comes up like normal. I click yes to allow, like usual, but then ES complains that I don't have root access and then everything there on out tells me I don't have root access.

Superuser reports that the su binary can't be found.

browsing to /system/bin/ and looking myself, i clearly see su sitting there.

I reboot the phone and I'm back to "normal"

I have my root access, everything is fine.

How could ES file manager trying to gain root cause this to happen?

update:

just tried "File Manager" from google play.

same problem as ES

hmmm
[Verizon Droid Charge] JihadSquad:
I would just avoid ES altogether. It is breaking functionality slowly.
[Verizon Droid Charge] jusliloleme:
Do I understand you correctly that you have two different superusers installed (Superuser-3.2-RC3-arm-signed.zip and su-bin-3.1.1-arm-signed.zip)? Perhaps that may the root (no pun intended) of your problem?
[Verizon Droid Charge] spezticle:
haha nice pun,

well, from my understanding it's not the same thing.

there's the SU binary and then the superuser application that manages other application access to the SU binary.

I got them from androidsu.com/superuser

and installed:

binary only

md5: d78ec986923b72dfdaa71d1db731a8f3

su-bin-3.1.1-arm-signed.zip

(3.2-RC3)

md5: 6462ac14cd38ed7c539ce3e29a6b92a8

Superuser-3.2-RC3-arm-signed.zip
[Verizon Droid Charge] kvswim:
You could try starting over and using SuperSU. Tweaked moved to that and its worked fine ever since.
[Verizon Droid Charge] spezticle:
son epseni

ahh, this is the first i'm hearing of SuperSu. I'll have to look into this more.
[Verizon Droid Charge] jusliloleme:
I agree that you should re-flash Tweaked 3.0 and then just use SuperSU and see what happens. I'm pretty sure you have multiple instances of an su binary on your phone giving both it and you heartburn.
[Verizon Droid Charge] spezticle:
the ivirita

Well,

I did just that and I no longer have any problems at all.

Thanks everybody :)
[Verizon Droid Charge] jusliloleme:
Good to hear and glad we could help.
[Verizon Droid Charge] stueycaster:
Stay away from ES File Explorer. I use Root Explorer and it's awesome. It's a paid app though. There's another good one that's free but I don't remember the name.
[Verizon Droid Charge] sasquatch080:
Can someone tell me what to do in es file explorer to Bork my charge. I have not had any issues that I've noticed. I have used es file explorer on my tablets and all my phones including the whole time with my charge and no probs. I've changed the build.prop. so many times. I haven't tried any build.prop changes on Tweaked 3.0 though. I'm on the Steele Blue theme at the moment. Stock kernel. Holo Launcher.
[Verizon Droid Charge] kvswim:
Root explorer is definitely my favorite.
[Motorola Atrix 2] mandark71:
I finally tried the official OTA ICS upgrade from ATT but phone won´t install it. I rooted my phone a long time ago to get rid of the bloatware, buy now can´t upgrade, what should I do? if anyone can help I would really appreciate it, thanks,

mandark71
[Motorola Atrix 2] Axis_Drummer:
You need to fxz back to 2.3.5 then OTA to 2.3.6, then you should be able to OTA to official ICS.

If you was on 2.3.6 then use the normal fxz and patch, and if you was on ICS Leak#1 use Jim's script.
[Motorola Atrix 2] sazhagianambi:
Axis, Just wanted to make sure...

I am not sure that we can do OTA after 2.3.5 FXZ as I remember somebody already reported as they don't see 2.3.6 OTA any more. I thought we had 2.3.6 FXZ package in that download page ( sbf driod developers page, last one is for 2.3.6 I believe). May be alteredkindness confirm as he is the one put together 2.3.6 fxz (for downgrading from ICS leak#1).

Edit:- Added the link for fxz download page
[Motorola Atrix 2] Axis_Drummer:
Yea i believe he said it was possible to fxz to 2.3.6 from GB in a related post.

Edit: Unless I'm overlooking it, I'm pretty sure if you are on GB 2.3.6, you have to go to 2.3.5 with the patch and OTA to 2.3.6. I believe the problem you're stating was related to ICS back to GB and that people couldn't OTA. But I think thats how the ICS to GB 2.3.6 came about.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong please.

Double Edit: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=32113181 this has the gb 2.3.6 fxz for everyone on gb still. Apologies for not seeing this sooner.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] daniel__18:
Hi,

I wanted to know what is the best modem for my GT-I9000 (european version without 850MHz). My sim is from T-Mobile.

Currently I'm running Jelly Bean 4.1.1 jro03u V2 with JVU modem (which is not so good).

Thanks,

Daniel
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Oct-Al:
Modems

Check out this thread: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=31131934. It's silky_dude's updated list for [CM7/CM9/CM10/MIUI] Modems. You may have to try a few until you find one which suits. I'm using XXJVT here in the UK.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] daniel__18:
Thanks but I prefer to install a modem that others already tried and of course worked better than JVU (with T-Mobile in USA).

What about the Nexus S modems:

http://www.xda-developers.com/android/samsung-galaxy-s-may-benefit-from-nexus-s-radio/

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1548815
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] blaqdemon:
p6800

Are these modems compatible with the Galaxy Tab P6800?

Thanks in advance
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Moonbloom:
Hello (:

I was wondering if ROM Cleaner for the Samsung Galaxy SIII:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1827817

would be compatible with the Note 2, or if something would have to be changed / editted for it to work?

They're both new high end Samsung phones, but i'm not a developer so i don't know if it would work, though i don't want to risk anything and try and use it..

But i could greatly use such a tool as ROM Cleaner (:

- Moon
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] corybucher:
Any app to resize icons?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] shiftr182:
Well, it depends on what your doing.....there are a few launchers that you can select your own icons and crop them, or adjust the size all together. Apex (crop), Go Launcher (adjust icon size). I personally use either desktop vizualizer or Uccw and make my own icons using a widget because you can get more sizes that way, like a 4x1 button for phone....