yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III General] IIIIkoolaidIIII:
Done the source one, working my way through twitter anf G+ now. They did post this 17 hours ago too:

https://twitter.com/SamsungExynos/status/264079781950287872
[Galaxy S III General] ghostofcain:
Yes also posted to this very thread about 17 hours ago. Please try and keep up.
[Galaxy S III General] IIIIkoolaidIIII:
Keep your hair on, lol. Hadn't refreshed the tab opened yesterday to work through when had some more time. Just noticed it as was posting to twitter. So added it to my post about signing up.
[Galaxy S III General] 101gamzer:
I have some doubt we have such a big community why cat anyone leak the Code just my personal opinion
[Galaxy S III General] Galaid:
lol good question. so many ROM leaks and never the source :)
[Galaxy S III General] Flynny75:
Because its incredibly unlikely that its the software engineers who are leaking the ROMs. And nobody else will have access to the source.
[Galaxy S III General] SiriusCybernetik:
If there is anything that won't accidentally leak from a company that should be source code.

Most of the time,individual employees have only access to the bits of source they need to work on.
[Galaxy S III General] Entropy512:
All of the Exynos maintainers (except POSSIBLY the Sprint guys, but I don't think they're getting any more Exynos devices) have declared they won't be buying any new devices unless Samsung makes major changes.

codeworkx is trying to sell his I9300. Dunno about xplodwild. Espenfjo and I both have 4412 devices, but mine is wifi-only (Note 10.1) and his doesn't have NFC (3G Note 10.1). We all still have our old 4210 devices, but we're all fried and doing far less with them these days. I'm not messing with core platform stuff unless we get official JB kernel source (for audio HAL stuff), the Replicant guys make a breaktrhough with audio HAL reverse engineering, or Samsung publishes non-broken platform HAL source (most importantly HWC).

Yeah. For example, leaks for AT&T devices come from someone within AT&T's testing division. People like that are pretty much equal to us in terms of source code access.
[Galaxy S III General] :
Found the thread on the 3rd page... People start to lose interest? :crying:
[Galaxy S III General] Hybridesque:
We're just waiting to see what shakes from the tree on the 12/13th.
[Galaxy S III General] mputtr:
it is November... just gotta wait and see if they're really going to release proper codes and hopefully bring back devs who want to work on these phones again.
[Galaxy S III General] x92:
not lose interest...maybe hopeless :(
[Galaxy S III General] mputtr:
no.

if you read anything towards the last 10 pages you would see it's not hopeless. it's a case of wait and see.
[Galaxy S III General] x92:
hmm... but I believe some of them who can't wait will go for nexus 4 or other phone in the process of waiting. My last hope is here where hopefully samsung will release the source. Whenever I come to this GS3 forum, all I see are same old complaint/comment like "Where's my JB?", "unused ram is wasted ram", "laggy dialer", "multi-task worst in JB"... The official ROM is badly made and if samsung don't release the source to help AOSP ROM then why should I keep this phone or why did I bought this phone in the first place. so I really hope samsung will release the source.
[Galaxy S III General] mputtr:
regardless of how many people have sold or want to sell their sgs3 for the nexus 4, the fact remains that we'll still have to wait and see till it actually happens.. or doesn't happen.

That's quite simply the case. We'll see when we see it happen.. or not.
[Galaxy S III General] btemtd:
Its cool that i dont have to make those type of complaints , i love touch wiz its great :p

---------- Post added at 06:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:51 PM ----------

.
[Galaxy S III General] :
:eek:
[Galaxy S III General] bala_gamer:
We have to wait till this month end for any fruitful info, if samsung dosent come up with the code we can start our campaign again

《swagged from aokp》
[Galaxy S III General] funkyblue04:
This is make or break for me. If they do not release what the developer's want, I personally will not buy a non-Nexus Samsung device again.
[Galaxy S III General] magarto:
Neither will I

Enviado desde mi Samsung Galaxy S2 usando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S III General] Turbotab:
Because leaking a ROM is like giving your neighbour a cup of sugar, leaking full source code is like giving them the kitchen.
[Galaxy S III General] ghostofcain:
Fixed that for you, BTW your taptalk sig suggests you have a nexus device anyway.
[Galaxy S III General] Rildiz:
Anyway on topic now.

Samsung said 12 of November. Now all I see is that its 'end of 2012'. So another fast one? More tricks and lies? Time to wage a war over the ether once again?

More scripts that automatically respond to every Samsung tweet asking for them to live up to their word?

I for one don't have my S3 anymore but I don't mind lending my voice to the cause.
[Galaxy S III General] kickokim:
Cyanogenmod should get someone to build them their own device! I bet there are a few thousand people on this forum that would buy it straight away if it's any good and the price is right!

The only reason I want to buy the nexus 4 and sell my s3 is to eventually have a fully working cyanogenmod build running on it!
[Galaxy S III General] bortak:
A device which they sadly would not be able to ship with Google Apps....
[Galaxy S III General] kickokim:
That depends on Google... They might make an exception! But hey, it's all hypothetical! I have another hypothetical question for you guys: if the optimus g has basically the same hardware as the nexus 4 does it mean that the cyan team can easily build fully working rom for it?
[Galaxy S III General] IIIIkoolaidIIII:
They could probably build a fully working ROM if the basic build is the same. The issue comes with the bootloader, the Optimus G will likely come with a locked bootloader so flashing of custom ROM will not be possible, unless someone can unlock said bootloader.
[Galaxy S III General] jayharper08:
Thread has been cleaned.

I will say this once and once only.......

Any more name-calling and childish grade school posts WILL result in infractions and/or ban. Period. This is not a thread to belittle someone or behave like a 12 yr old.

Consider this fair warning.

---Jay--- Mobile moderating from the m.A.A.d. city Nexus™
[Galaxy S III General] TheCraig:
I would buy it, and it probably won't be horrible overpriced, I mean it would probably have a Tegra 3 or a Snapdragon S4 Pro, Either way I would buy it :P Completely Open source.
[Galaxy S III General] ghostofcain:
This is the same Google that issued a cease and desist order on Cyanogen? No way are they gonna make an exception for an Open source OS, sorry.
[Galaxy S III General] gaspernemec:
Dont get me wrong, i would love samsung releases sources since i enjoy dualbooting vanilla and stock sammy. But all sudden world is going to end when some devs left sgs3? No, there are going to be new devs (anyone remembers sgs1? When codeworkx left it....soon pawitp took over and sgs1 still has official latest CM), there will always be guy who will port cm/aosp to our devices......plus there is samsung, xda community is nothing more than few % of 30 mio sgs3 they sold, honestly you think they will care if you will give those xyz€ to lg? I dont think so.....do you think they will care if dev leaves their flagship? They have already show how much they care in my opinion+why would they release sources for you to run custom fw, to run it even after samsung stops upgrading it, and because of it doesnt give them fresh xyz€, i dont think so......samsung is company, face it, for them we are numbers, nothing more. (Still official jellybean is still crap for S3 ;))
[Galaxy S III General] kickokim:
That's bad, I didn't know that, I hope they had a good reason and it got sorted out. Cyanogenmod is one of the reasons I love Android. But if an OEM made a cyanogenmod device there probably wouldn't be any licensing issues and they should be able to include gapps.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
It takes like 3-5 seconds to flash an external gapps package.. :p
[Galaxy S III General] Flynny75:
Wasnt that only because of the gapps? Now CM doesnt come with any gapps, Google has no problem. And its understandable, seeing as oems have to fit specific criteria to be authorised to use the gapps, and CM was/is not officially regulated.
[Galaxy S III General] bala_gamer:
Looks like the about section of github is updated

《sent from my beast》
[Galaxy S III General] rockyseenu:
Also some tags on Jellybean in libhardware. I believe there were only ICS stuffs earlier.

Is this something new?

http://git.insignal.co.kr/insignal/origen_quad/android/platform/hardware/libhardware/

Please excuse me if it's not.
[Galaxy S III General] ghostofcain:
Yes but my reply was regarding Google allowing a cyanogenmod phone to run Gapps.

---------- Post added at 02:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:41 PM ----------

I'm sure they would be barred from including the Gapps on the device out of the box.
[Galaxy S III General] biffsmash:
Still don't get all the whining and crying about Exynos sources??? CM on SGS3 is no better or worse than it's ever been on any device.

Back when I had a HTC Desire, CM was no better than stock save for a few customizations. It never has been and never will be any faster or better on battery than stock, so don't see why everyone's complaining.
[Galaxy S III General] ghostofcain:
Really? On the DHD cm 7 was a world ahead of stock sense rom, battery life was much the same but speed was a whole different league. For me AOSP roms where a no brainer , until I got my SGS3 when the comprises are just too great.
[Galaxy S III General] gnan10:
Does htc one x has better support for cyanogenmod roms? Because i had a best deal here to get shifted to one x.. Please let me know guys...does it has good development support than s3 has???
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
I'm pretty sure Tegra and Exynos go hand in hand in the open source department.
[Galaxy S III General] gnan10:
Sorry mate...i didn't get u...more detail please:)
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Exynos is undocumented and there's barely any source to get. Most sources are broken and incompatible. (i.e. too old)

IIRC, Tegra is no better in terms of that.
[Galaxy S III General] Scarface1991:
The problem with Exynos is that according to the devs it`s a huge pain in the ass to develop on them. Look how fast devices which are OMAP or Qualcomm based got a fully working Jelly Bean ROM. The Galaxy SII I9100G (OMAP) got it in about 1-2 weeks after Google released Jelly Bean (with working TV-OUT) and it worked better than what we have now for the SIII and the SII I9100

Fact is that the maintainers that are active now said that CM11 probably won`t come to Exynos based devices unless Samsung does something about it.

Ok, maybe there will be other maintainers who want to develop for Exynos based devices but there is no sign of them yet, since Entropy512, Codeworkx, Xplodwild and Espenfjo consider to leave Exynos development completely.

So that`s why we are whining and spamming Samsung, so they release something useful and not the broken useless crap that is up there now:

http://git.insignal.co.kr/samsung/e...m/hardware/samsung_slsi/exynos4/?h=exynos-ics
[Galaxy S III General] TheCraig:
I regret getting the S3, I figured CM10 would be blazingly fast due to the AOSP and Quad core, appears not, But lets hope support does improve.
[Galaxy S III General] rockyseenu:
not sure what sammy is doing there - now these repositories are gone! Sure something is happening there ;)

Hoping for the best!!

Edit: It's back again with changes from 17th October :) Posted in CM thread for a dev to have a look.
[Galaxy S III General] gnan10:
Thaks for kind reply mate...i'll skip of buying one x ...i'll obviously wait for nexus 4...all about to think is its price variation in different countries
[Galaxy S III General] Scarface1991:
This doesn`t sound good :(

Until now there is absolutely nothing useful from this update on GIT that Samsung provided 11 days ago :mad:
[Galaxy S III General] anup123456:
Got reply from Their Official Twitter support - @SamsungSupport
[Galaxy S III General] The-Captain:
You guys got my attention.
[Galaxy S III General] :
:cool:
[Galaxy S III General] Zatta:
We need to keep this one going, now more than ever. Seriously, keep posting this stuff everywhere we can!

I have the feeling that we are aiming on the right departement this time: PR, not directly to developement.
[Galaxy S III General] Jack Barrett:
I think Samsung should treat their customers as valuable because we are the ones who made their company known. I dont know why is this small piece of code such a big secret. Probably they think they found the best way to optimize it to be fastest and they dont want to share so other companies wont take advantage of the code. Selfish isnt it? Its about time and im sure we will see the sources soon if we keep spreading the world about it. ;)
[Galaxy S III General] f0xy:
Maybe mention something about apple i.e "make it open source just to stick another knife into Apple" ha :D

---------- Post added at 11:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:26 PM ----------

This sounds like a generic reply. :(

I shall post the same to them.

Good job though in getting their attention

---------- Post added at 11:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:33 PM ----------

How are would it be to request @xdadevelopers to tweet/DM @SamsungExynos? As they both follow each other or atleast samsung follow xda...
[Galaxy S III General] bortak:
That lit a bulb. What about something along the lines of "do not become apple with closed source hardware/ software" or "show the difference between you and apple with open/ closed software/hardware".

**** I dunno, I'm pulling stuff out of my arse here, you guys figure it out lol.
[Galaxy S III General] JYJY:
Posting to Pages Temporarily Disabled

We've noticed that your account has been posting spam and irrelevant content on Facebook Pages. Because of this, your ability to post on Page walls has been suspended for 15 days.

If you continue to post spam after this block has been lifted, your account could be permanently disabled.

You can learn more about Facebook Community Standards here:

http://www.facebook.com/communitystandards

I understand that posting spam is prohibited and against the Facebook Community Standards.

LOL should i stop ?? :laugh::laugh::laugh:
[Galaxy S III General] BatGnat:
./ Slashdot

I submitted the OP to slashdot. You never know....
[Galaxy S III General] kcrudup:
?!

Real World (which really doesn't give a isht about this kinda stuff) > XDA, in any case. Samsung has little reason to care and XDA seems to not realize this.
[Galaxy S III General] K Rich:
Awesome work guys! Generic response or not, at least its a response. Let's continue our efforts! :D
[Galaxy S III General] budisuharto:
I see

How does Samsung compare to HTC in this regard? I was on HTC Desire, and we had some really fancy stuff, app2sd, S-off, CM or any other AOSP roms running smooth, whereas CM 9/10 doesn't appear to be running well on SGS 3
[Galaxy S III General] randombrick:
Needs to be a more concerted effort

Hello folks,

As a custom ROM user, I appreciate what you guys are doing. However, in my opinion, rather than a disjointed effort there needs to be some uniformity to this. For e.g. as someone suggested a freeexynos.org website.

At the very least, we should use a single phrase to get search hits. Use that as the hashtag on all your posts to FB, Twitter, etc. I think FreeExynos is a bit too technical for the layman user. Something else will work better. A few suggestions from me to start this

#DoTheRightThingSamsung

#FreeMySamsung

#FreeSamsungGalaxy

#FreeSamsungS3

(like the last two best because it will get more hits with the words "Free" and "Galaxy" or "S3" together)

/just my humble opinion
[Galaxy S III General] atulalvenkar:
HTC uses Qualcomm chips and Qualcomm does open their code. Same is the case with TI. Only Samsung and Nvidia don't.
[Galaxy S III General] Jeddix:
The Desire was basically a Nexus One and therefore had full AOSP support.

:mobile:
[Galaxy S III General] Zatta:
#FreeSamsungS3 it will be than!

Taptalked u see .. əəs n pəʞlɐʇdɐʇ
[Galaxy S III General] atulalvenkar:
It's not just S3, S2/Note1/Note2 users are in the same boat. FreeExynos

or FreeSamsung is better.
[Galaxy S III General] randombrick:
They are all galaxy devices, so may I recommend #FreeSamsungGalaxy. If we don't add galaxy it just seems like we are talking about the company not the devices.
[Galaxy S III General] SmithyNZ:
Done :D
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
I'll stay with the S3. I'm tired of constantly looking for the better phone. It suits my needs and I'll possibly keep it for a year or more.
[Galaxy S III General] ghostofcain:
No, they didn't promise to release sources at once. Imho the dump last month was making sure everything was included, but not necessarily up to date, prior to the new stuff getting added. So keep your hair on no promises have been broken, yet.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
I agree. Samsung said November and then said end of 2012. Depending on how you twist it, November can very well be in the "end of 2012" scale.
[Galaxy S III General] IIIIkoolaidIIII:
We may want to comment on there G+ posts about our favourite colour! Was think the Open kind!

https://plus.google.com/u/0/100259500986711059755/posts/9q357UME4nW
[Galaxy S III General] :
From where is this quote?
[Galaxy S III General] hsrars-d:
Wow..... Im coming from Motorola phone and never will buy any Motorola device again because they failed several times keeping their promises. Got an S3 just to see that Samsung is not better really....

But, i'll still wait for samsungs move, cause the Nexus 4 looks kinda ugly to my eyes :p
[Galaxy S III General] exynoss:
U know there is only a phone which suites to your needs thatvis which u set in your avatar
[Galaxy S III General] NeoCream:
Wow.... no CM11 support for the GS3 unless they release the source code? Now this s*cks .... I wished I had waited for the Nexus 4 ... :crying:
[Galaxy S III General] Steve_max:
Nobody ever said that. What we know is that the current Team Hacksung is tired of the current situation, and none of them is willing to keep working on Exynos devices if they don't get access to the source. This means they won't work on CM11 for the current devices unless Samsung delivers. This does not mean that the S3 won't get CM11, only that other people will have to step up to develop it.
[Galaxy S III General] bala_gamer:
thats funny and true.. smartphones changed the purpose of a phone as a basic communication device :cowboy: , telegrams, letters i have only heard of that may be used once or twice, next gen people will dont even know about those methods :D
[Galaxy S III General] mputtr:
dude, those old smartphones were the best things ever. ridiculously strong signal, built to last a nuclear winter, doubles as a weapon, lasts for days or in some cases a week, and is 1/4 the price.

and snake.... oh yeah... snake.... best freakin time waster ever.
[Galaxy S III General] Scarface1991:
It`s from the SII I9100 CM10 Thread:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1794758&page=2002
[Galaxy S III General] b-eock:
Snake was a beast game, i played that for hours on end!!!! XD
[Galaxy S III General] gavin-phelan:
I see samsung released new source codes to for jb on galaxy tab numorus android twitter pages said "look like we might get some decent jellybean rom" hopefully s3 will be soon ;)
[Galaxy S III General] IIIIkoolaidIIII:
This is just the firmware source code, the same as we have for the GS3 already. It's documentation and source code related to the Chipset that is needed.

I have been commenting on all there posts on G+ requesting sources, maybe they will notice but doubt it. Would be good if more people were on there commenting and +1 comments about source code request. These comments will stand out in there stats then and hopefully make them take note a bit more. The same can be said for twitterr and Facebook, though I no longer use Facebook myself and twitter is just a cluttered mess with very little real engagement any longer.
[Galaxy S III General] Entropy512:
Not quite correct there.

Kernel source for devices that received JB was published - in accordance with Samsung's legal requirements to provide this source.

What we need to properly go forward are the sources for various HAL components, which Samsung is not legally required to provide - but which TI and Qualcomm DO provide. e.g. we want Samsung to meet the standards TI and Qualcomm are meeting with sources for various parts of the platform HALs.
[Galaxy S III General] jetbruceli:
I hope we get the sources for you devs my android devices would not cool without you guys! Gl!
[Galaxy S III General] IIIIkoolaidIIII:
Cool, sorry man, was generalising a bit. Thanks for your clarification.
[Galaxy S III General] beginnerteur:
Hello,

I posted on twitter and I got the following answer:

Did they really published our needed source codes for the chipset and I did not notice that, will it come in future or are they lying?
[Galaxy S III General] wolfboy1984:
We will find out in 5 days.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Since Samsung has made a promise this big, in media and whatnot, it'd be very foolish to not stand true to that word.
[Galaxy S III General] Stevemeister:
Massive spam action towards Samsung part two commencing in 5 days.... :eek:
[Galaxy S III General] hsrars-d:
I'm in !
[Galaxy S III General] epicstar1:
Meh... I'm going to take a guess and say Samsung has no love for the i777 and i9100?
[Galaxy S III General] sodeknetters:
They are still only referring to the development boards which begs the question how useful these sources/docs will actually be for our phone models with these SoCs...
[Galaxy S III General] beginnerteur:
Why, what will happen in 5 days:confused:
[Galaxy S III General] banderos101:
Yep, the 'BOARD' comment is a little disheartening, sounds too much like PR speak, as in, ?spelling? origion board, ONLY,

disheartening, especially when our devs have specifically asked for sources and documentations for the devices themselves and not just for the origon board, hope im wrong, but if nothing , at the very least an update before the year is out, otherwise ill likely be ignoring future products....until they start listening to ALL customers, not just the majority, if that happens to be the case

"IF they, DONT release the DEVICE sources and documentation, WELL, they never specifically SAID they would , they say BOARD, does that mean only ORIGION, and not DEVICE...........i can imagine them saying, "well, you guys were excited about getting "what you THOUGHT you were getting", whats the dealio.........we will no longer cater to dev community because your a bunch of ungratefull moaners, we give you what you ask, and then complain some more"

God i hope my paranoia is wrong

Sorry dont mean to get hopes down, or sound negative, you just see this example a lot in business, seems to be a mantra for alot of them........pray too :eek: some sort of godlike business diety, the kind that drinks blood and...... bambi/s.......awwww "so cute"......ahhum, in an old fashioned manly like manner, you understand......whooooh, BEER! :mad:

Saying that........I have high hopes:D...........sort.of.sarcasm...........honestly, ill wait and see