[Android Apps and Games] CollegeDev:
The problem of it all is, that it cost many time to develop such a tool you mentioned above.

It would be an own project. I don't know if I have time for that :(

Nice! Many Thanks

Did you try following:

./vendor/cm/get-prebuilts

?

I haven't any influence on autopatcher....

Related the download-link: I don't like torrent :D Can you please upload it on zippyshare or dropbox?

If I read something like this above (bold) I don't know what I should think about. I will reach back now to the beginning, where I got first touch with PDroid: I and many other users was waiting for the next release of svyats PDroid 1.32 for ICS, but it never appears. So, mateo and pastime appears and port PDroid to ICS. Sure, I was happy about that and directly tried to compile the sources and test it. Result: Bootloops, Force-Closes and many more. After I read a lot, user said that this is quiet normal. I wasn't satisfied with the situation and wrote my own testing environment and fixed some bugs, so that I was able to use PDroid without all these issues. After this I wrote the first Addon for PDroid which was able to deny the access to camera and microphone. After a while, the user request was so high that I decided to write a new Manager application and framework features too. What I did until now (only a coarse description):

Framework features:

Android ID

Call Phone

Send SMS

Send MMS

Record Audio

Access Camera

Force online state (fake online state to permanent online)

Wifi Info

ICC Access (integrated circuit-card access, for reading/writing sms on ICC)

Switch network state (e.g. mobile network)

Switch Wifi State

Start on Boot (prevents that application gets the INTENT_BOOT_COMPLETE Broadcast)

Manager Application:

I wrote the most enhanced manager application for PDroid ever, for free!

Bugfixes, Portings, and others:

~50% of the original code is partial rewritten by me

Ported PDdroid to: 4.1.2, 4.2.1, improved ICS version

Many more other code enhancements

The only thing what I've not done until now was to upload the whole sources on github, I just uploaded it here. So, let me try to describe what happens then: Fuuy5 came with mateo and forked PDroid2.0. They Introduced the community that all is better now, that they have fixed bugs and that all is opensource. Furthermore: PDroid2.0 is not supported anymore by autopatcher. Let me try to explain how it feels like with one example: I fork mateos auto_patcher and put with a team of 5 men support for over 20 ROMs. Then I will make it public and introduce: Hey guys, here is the new auto_patcher. It supports now more then 30 ROMs and all is working fine, without bugs and so on... And what do you think what happens? Yes, mainstream people would use the new patcher, because it supports more ROMs then the old one. Really, PDroid2.0 was always opensource, only the manager application is closed source (

which will change in future if I found the right license for it, then I push it to github

). And now, please tell me the different between the policies? Where is the different between? Both are hosted on GitHub, both are under the GPL v3, and so on. The only different is that there is a history of PDroid, which is not on my github.

I really put horrible work into PDroid and without me we all users would still "stuck" at v1.32 with the old manager-app. And of course, I talked with a lot of recognized Dev's here at XDA about that. All of them said that the work which I put into PDroid is not enough appreciated by the community. Today, I still get emails why I don't support 4.2.1, wtf? It is just because the message in auto_patcher say that PDroid2.0 is not available vor 4.2.1, which doesn't fit the reality. Furthermore users said to me that they thought the PDroid2.0 Manager application will not developed anymore. They thought the PDroidManager from Fuuy5 is now the manager for the version of PDroid and my manager is outdated. There are so many myths about the PDroid versions, that I cannot describe them all...

Here is a nice post from user jahrule, which describes it in a nice way:

It just got 2 thanks, nothing to say...

Anyway, I haven't enough desire to talk about that every time a user pm or email me. I'm currently think about to leave the project, because I get more and more frustrated due to this ****.

If there is no PDroidAgent directory, the patch will create it. So don't worry about.

Many thanks!:good:

It normally should work, I will test it. Curently, the script have to be at the same directory as the patch script.

I will looking forward to create the channel. Related the server: If I get time I will ask an IT-Professor if he can give me an advice how we can manage that.

The patches for the framework doesn't get an update, as you can see at the commits. So, the framework is still the same, just the app updated and the script.

Mhh, normally it should work if the patches are at the same directory where the script is... (dirty, I know)

Another variant how you can handle it :)

Sure? Normally it should be the same like compiling cm10

Thanks for support.