yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Android Development] makalolo:
lol no gapps...where i can download the gapp?someone give link pls....rom damm fast love this
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Android Development] dhalham:
Goto www.jellaxy.com and click links, then gapps provided by KonsTat
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Android Development] The Zel:
How's the battery?
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Android Development] Prawesome:
Has anyone actually tested this rom out instead of asking,"Is this working? Is that working?"

You can help the devs by trying out AOKP settings,CM settings, PNA settings and seeing if they crash if you switch something on or change the values of something ...Also,take a logcatsl while reproducing these issues.

Cheers
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Android Development] makalolo:
already test and the rom very fast love this.....the browser damm fast .... nims you are the king :D.... link2sd work with ext4 alredy try .... battery life is good....
[Windows Phone 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Jola66:
Ive used a few ROMs for HTC Trophy and have found that some ROMs, the Field Test doesnt work. Ive tried a few codes that I knew of, and the only thing you get is Field Test Loading ....

The chef of the ROM isnt sure why it doesnt work. Can anyone else shed light on this? What would be the reason it doesnt work, any possible fixes?
[Windows Phone 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TheXev:
Well, I was doing some digging on this today.. by accident.. while I waited for my frank-n-spark-w to finish an update test. I noticed my frank-n-spark-w had a newer PRL, so I tired to update it on my primary phone running myXevRev beta 1a... no go. I cannot get my PRL to update?!

I talked to ultrashot before the release of my rom (because I didn't see the point if I couldn't at least get the phone to program, which wasn't possible previously), and he told me to update the Xap Deployer package found in Dynamics7 to the newest version [v1.1-upd1]. Sure enough, after that, the phone appears to program.. but it can fail if done too quickly after first boot.

I know Servicetools.xap from the PMENU package is installing correctly now beyond a reasonable doubt (otherwise ##PST# wouldn't work in my rom), but I can't be sure EmbeddedTool.xap is installing correctly. I think that package had to do with the actual modification of the radio data for the CDMA Trophy during *228 programming.

I've got a GoldC (HTC Pro 7 or Arrive for Sprint users) from US Cellular on the way, so I'll be diving into that phone soon enough. I want to know if US Cellular and Sprint users have had similar programming issues with their phones and unlocked roms.. but haven't really had time to look up the info or go ask them. XD Sprint phones program using a different process then Verizon, plus Sprint can usually push PRL updates out whenever they want to users. US Cellular.. I dunno how they work vs Sprint.

After today though, I'm sure that even with some of the issue worked out, but other parts remain to be fixed. I swore that on a stock SparkW, that the phone would automatically put itself into airplane mode for a second after programing, but it doesn't appear to do that using my XevRev rom, but you can still program the phone even after a full factory reset (which isn't possible using DFT or older Dynamics7 for full unlock with SparkW).

Ultrashot may have some more ideas, but I'll test to confirm which part is still broken. I still have yet to try unsigning the xap in question and seeing if it will install then. The default xaps in that package are signed just like Market Place xap files, even though you can't download them as Market Place apps. ^^; I'm still working on getting my kitchen back up and running after my desktop died, so I'll be exploring this issue again soon.
[Windows Phone 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sianto1997:
No problem anymore! I (am the chef, and I) fixed it in v1.5.4! (http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1909006)

(an for the HTC Arrive, I made that rom already! (http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1900007))

My ROMs are all now smooth and just working. Thank you very much!
[Windows Phone 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TheXev:
Okay, EmbeddedTool was working in my rom, you need to dial ##634# to access it. Still, there is something funky with programing okay on.. I'm going to make a video so I can demonstrate it.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] xenbomb:
Question for anyone smart... I have 4 extra Hyperion batteries... could I carefully wire them all together to make a very long lasting massive battery pack?? Basically piggy back them all together and not run the factory back plate (make a ugly custom backplate with a bump to fit them?) Any input would be great !! Thanks
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] afrobull:
Uh...In theory I'm sure this could work but I don't think this would actually be a good idea. Why not just keep them charged and use them as backups?
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Welsyntoffie:
If you have four 1000mah battries and connect them together you Will not have a 4000mah battery, it will still be 1000mah. But it will hold a 3.7volt charge for longer. Especially when playing 3d games.

HTC Sensation z710e

ICS 4.0.3

Sense version 4.0

Software Sense-o-maniac v1.4

Kernel. 3.0.30 Bricked v1.4

Radio 11.68.3504
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] smelenchuk:
mAh is a unit of energy. Four batteries hold four times the energy of one battery, so - wired properly - four 1000mAh batteries would indeed form an effective 4000mAh battery.

I don't know anything about li-ion charging circuitry, but my gut instinct is that trying to tie phone batteries in this fashion is a bad idea. If you really wanted to try it, though, you'd wire each individual connector on one battery to the SAME connector on the others - thus, you get the same voltage across the "superbattery", just with four times the cells powering them.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] drock212:
Check this out it might help with what you're looking to do. I did it and it functions a little weird but I think it's because I kept both control modules on there so I'll get weird things like a jump in percentage if I don't use the phone which leads me to believe that 1 battery might be charging the other. Again check it out

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1800177
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Welsyntoffie:
You wont get 4000mah battery using four 1000mah batteries. All you will have then is a very strong VOLTAGE which has nothing to do with current. You can not add current, only voltage. I drive around with RC cars and fly electric RC planes. I know my batteries.

I can explaine this in way more details but i dont think there is room here for everything.

HTC Sensation z710e

ICS 4.0.3

Sense version 4.0

Software Sense-o-maniac v1.4

Kernel. 3.0.30 Bricked v1.4

Radio 11.68.3504

---------- Post added at 01:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:48 PM ----------

Here is an example. You have Two 4ohm subs and One monoblock (one channel amp) if you connect the subs in Series to the one channel you will have a 2ohm load. If you connect the subs in Parralel you will have an 8ohm load.

HTC Sensation z710e

ICS 4.0.3

Sense version 4.0

Software Sense-o-maniac v1.4

Kernel. 3.0.30 Bricked v1.4

Radio 11.68.3504
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] baskln:
Two 4 ohm subs connected in series would be 8 ohms not 4. You've got it backwards. Two 4 ohm subs in parallel would be 2 ohms.

http://physics.bu.edu/py106/notes/Circuits.html

Battieres in series will increase voltage, batteries in parallel will not.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Welsyntoffie:
Yes your right, thanks for pointing that out. I got it in reverse.

HTC Sensation z710e

ICS 4.0.3

Sense version 4.0

Software Sense-o-maniac v1.4

Kernel. 3.0.30 Bricked v1.4

Radio 11.68.3504

---------- Post added at 04:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:18 PM ----------

It seems this new page i found states otherwise then i have mentioned. My opologies. Here is the link... http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/serial_and_parallel_battery_configurations

HTC Sensation z710e

ICS 4.0.3

Sense version 4.0

Software Sense-o-maniac v1.4

Kernel. 3.0.30 Bricked v1.4

Radio 11.68.3504
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] xenbomb:
thats perfect!! thanks im doing it with 4!!!
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] ricky0702:
which is best app for samsung s3 to use capture an image ?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] KennyG123:
You checked "Yes this is a question"

That means it goes in Q&A

Please read forum rules before posting

Thread Moved

FNM
[Galaxy S I9000 General] AusMatt:
I've got an unlocked Australian (Telstra) Samsung Galaxy S i9000T that I've been using on the Optus network (with Amaysim).

I've run numerous stock and custom ROMs and recently backed up the /efs folder (using: "tar -czf /sdcard/Download/blah.tar.gz efs") after some scares with boot loops while trying to load a new Devil kernel with my TeamNYX RC5 Android 4.0.4 ICS ROM.

With these custom ROMs the phone identifies itself as an i9000 (instead of i9000T that it showed with the Telstra FROYO.JP8 ROM).

The other day the airplane mode became unavailable and I lost the mobile network.

I've tried going back to the original ROM (got it with Check Fus) and done factory resets etc but I still get emergency calls only.

I've tried swapping sims and my sim works in the other phone but no sim will work in my phone.

I've also reloaded my efs folder but nothing has helped.

I've check the "Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association" web site to see if my IMEI is barred/blocked and it's not.

Does anyone have an idea on how to work out whats going on and what can be done to investigate/fix the problem ?
[Galaxy S I9000 General] O-T:
This forum always had a search function. Web, tapalk or xda app has it.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=9567974

Not expecting thanks for being reluctantly helpful :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S I9000 General] xsenman:
problem would be due to branded phone, meaning you need a telstra ROM, for it to connect to telstra network.. try this https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=da77fff5eaaed269&id=DA77FFF5EAAED269!296 and its not easy to get one
[Galaxy S I9000 General] AusMatt:
xsenman,

I'm currently back on the stock Telstra branded ROM (obtained with CheckFus) but with the same problem.

Also, I'm not trying to connect to the Telstra network. I just trying to use Amaysim (via Optus) that has always worked before.

I'm guessing it's one of three problems:

- Corrupted EFS (but my IMEI is correct)

- A block that the Australian data base doesn't know about

- An actual hardware problem

I've tried a lot of things including have the phone re-create /efs and then I put the imei folder back.

I'm wondering how to track down the cause. I.e. is there a way to examine logs of why not able to get on the network?
[Galaxy S I9000 General] AusMatt:
O-T,

I've read that thread. That was how I backed up my /efs before this problem.

I was never able to get the /dev/block/st13 though and just have the efs folder.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] AusMatt:
xsenman,

My sim is from Amaysim and worked before with the stock Telstra ROM that I've gone back to now. I've not tried your ROM as it looks like to be the stock one I'm using.

I can't access the "mobile networks" settings as the phone doesn't think I've got a sim installed at all.

It looks like a hardware problem.

Could this be a boot loader / radio mismatch ?

Also, is there any reason to not always use the latest version of Odin I have ?
[Galaxy S I9000 General] xsenman:
Also could happen, IF SIM card is inserted the wrong way, cleaning the SIM contacts , using any Odin will do or try using another SIM card
[Galaxy S I9000 General] AusMatt:
You're right.

Problem solved. Amazingly the I9000 doesn't stop you from putting the SIM card in the wrong way round.

Thanks for your help.
[Galaxy Note II General] csmits:
The Note II recently passed trough the FCC for the AT&T, T-mobile and Verizon version.

I wanted to put in a link, but since i am a new user, I can't.

What immediately struck my eye is that the drawings are all different shapes. I don't know how far we can rely on these drawings or shapes to be accurate but it worries me. They did the same with the Galaxy s2. My t-mobile version is completely different compared to the international version for example.

Also when you read some of the test documents on the FCC website, it mentions some dimensions of the phone and they are for each carrier different.

I hope this is not the case, because it would make it harder to find accessories.
[Galaxy Note II General] paul2834:
engadget[dot]com/2012/09/28/samsung-galaxy-note-ii-variants-for-att-t-mobile-verizon-at-fcc/

^I'm also a new poster, so you'll have to append the actual "." where it says [dot]. I don't know anything about FCC documents, but as far as leaked images and non-FCC reports go, there's no indication that we're going to get the debacle that unfolded pre S III days. Pictures of Sprint, Verizon, AT&T, and US Cellular variants (some of them are test units) have already been leaked or released and they all retain the same shape with the only cosmetic differences being the branding.
[Galaxy Note II General] deeznutz1977:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/28/...or-att-t-mobile-verizon-at-fcc/#disqus_thread here s a screenshot
[Galaxy Note II General] csmits:
Thanks for the tip Paul2834 and for the screenshot deeznutz1977.

And indeed we saw the devices for the carriers and nothing suggested different shapes for each.,

So I hope this is the case. If you read some of the test results from PCtest engineering laboratory Inc for the FCC they mention that the dimensions for the Verizon device are 80,5mm x 151mm, while the same company states the dimensions for the T-Mobile version are 77mm x 146mm.

But I guess we will have to wait until released. They kept the same form for the SIII, so I would be surprised they didn't do this for the Note II, especially if they are launching them all at the same time.
[Galaxy Note II General] paul2834:
I'll be buying the T-Mobile variant and I actually wouldn't mind the Note II being a bit smaller. :p I don't think we'll have to wait until release. T-Mobile will hopefully give us some release pics or specs in advance.
[Galaxy Note II General] spridell:
It would also surprise me if the phones had different dimensions.

This launch is going exactly the same as the SIII and they were all the same.

If I were a betting man I would say they will all be the same size.
[Galaxy Note II General] donniegood:
What is the likelihood that the actual device is different that the FCC filing. The papers are what 2-3 weeks old? It's not like it was some super early test model then right? One would have to assume that of these were being tested after ifa that if they were going to be the same dimensions the FCC would show that. Or does this happen often that FCC documents are off on specs? I am just hoping they are all the same that's most likely a deal breaker for me.
[Galaxy Note II General] spridell:
The Only carrier that we have not seen yet is Verizon.

There are pictures floating around o Sprints version, ATT Version and T-Mobile version and they are all the same.

ATT

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1910994

Sprint

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WP-DAlLBtC4

T-Mobile

http://cdn.gottabemobile.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/gnote2specsheet-575x515.png
[Galaxy Note II General] na7q:
all variants are identical.
[Galaxy Note II General] Hotobu:
When is the last time that phones have had different dimensions across carriers?
[Galaxy Note II General] Jcossack88:
Very interesting....here is a picture of Sprints test device with the back popped off. Notice the corners are squared
[Galaxy Note II General] spridell:
That was most likely their prototype for testing.

Here is a video of Sprints Version:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WP-DAlLBtC4

and here is off Sprints website:

http://community.sprint.com/baw/com...t-introduces-samsung-galaxy-note-ii-this-fall
[Galaxy Note II General] deeznutz1977:
hope you guys are right :)
[Galaxy Note II General] Mook1e:
Really???

Samsung Galaxy S, Samsung Galaxy S2.

It was a pretty big deal for the Galaxy S3 to be identical across all carriers.
[Galaxy Note II General] spridell:
T-Mobile Version.

They will all be the same. This confirms it even more

http://phandroid.com/2012/10/03/t-m...ed-in-the-wild-is-that-a-branded-home-button/
[Galaxy Note II General] csmits:
This is good news.

Also like the fact that the branding of the providers in on the back with this smartphone.

My t989 (T-mobile's Galaxy s2) has it in the front. now you can get a new back cover and can loose the carrier logo :D
[Galaxy Note II General] hanbaoquan15:
Doesn't make sense to even ask this question. The screen size is one of the biggest selling point of this device. Making it smaller kinda defeats the purpose of it.
[Galaxy Note II General] JoJo2211:
2011.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dafoxs:
If you can figure out how to do this, let me know, I managed to do it once and it does work. The screen has to stay off. I'm thinking that app that turns the screen off when you flip it upside down, can't find it though. Anyone have it?

Sent from my SGH-I717 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dafoxs:
Try this, turn blue tooth on and your earpiece off, make a call, turn the screen off. While in a call and the screen is off, turn your earpiece on. Only problem is, if the phone wakes for any reason, you loose bluetooth.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Bubba:
I have no idea what you are asking or talking about. I have read both post 3 times. I can tell you that I have no issue with Bluetooth. I use it daily for calls. During these calls I surf the net, text, and chat without ever losing Bluetooth. Maybe edit your post and be more clear on what you are stating or asking ... at this point I'm unclear what this thread is about.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dafoxs:
It doesn't work for most of us, what rom and version are you on?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] wase4711:
I'll bet its Gubment Cheese, version 9-11, because that is the ONLY jb rom recently that BT works normally on....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dafoxs:
SlimBean or liquid before 9/11 also
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] wase4711:
strange how 9-11 seems to be the "cut off" date for working bluetooth on many cm10 based roms..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Hammerfest:
or B2, but as I said in the other Bluetooth thread, it depends on your BT device as well... mine works w/o issue
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dafoxs:
Thought the same thing.

Wonder what would happen if I removed the last line, it isn't included in this file when BT was working?

Picture won't load

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] wase4711:
probably worth a shot..

I'm going back to Darkstar, since BT works fine on it...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] flappjaxxx:
It isn't strange at all. There were a ton of commits to bluetooth on 9/14 to CM10. Bluetooth was fully functional on my Beta 2 build as well which I released on 9/12 and it worked just right on Gubment Cheeze 9/11 because I gave rasroy the audio_policy.conf file I was using in my build and tweaked which is what helped make it work. I have been working today to try and revert the commits with varied results as far as bluetooth compiling or even working at all. Right now I would be surprised if there are any 'fixes' out there. Everyone just needs to be patient and it will get sorted out eventually one way or another.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] wase4711:
thanks for the explanation, man, and I agree there is no doubt that eventually it will work again..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dafoxs:
I'm going to have to agree with you on this. I've compared every file regarding BT, there was only one small difference. Removing it did nothing. In the new roms there is now a bluetooth file in system/etc that contains a bunch of files that were never there.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] flappjaxxx:
These are the commits that broke stuff I believe:

https://github.com/CyanogenMod/andr...mmit/6d0ef41e4f0d77ad2e040cfccb3bfa1c6d0c7032

https://github.com/CyanogenMod/andr...mmit/c771d5a575c25478812f85c3ae5bd7a4d2739138

https://github.com/CyanogenMod/andr...mmit/071b44a3959b839541f86d945c65c356fc46c9d4

It may just be one, or a combination of more than one or a combination of all.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dafoxs:
I'll leave all those to the experts. I have no clue what to do with that.

BTW, your rom and kernel are rock solid. Only problem I have, you rootdev app is nice, I couldn't ever post anything in your forums with it, there was no way to get to the submit button.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Bubba:
And yes I am on Gubment Cheeze. And thank you Flapp. Your awesomeness ... it is greatly appreciated.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] flappjaxxx:
edit delete
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dafoxs:
I'm giving it a shot, let you know
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] borijess:
Tried it didn't work.

Sent from the TermiNOTEr! ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dafoxs:
Same here, the answer has to be in that new folder

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] MaxFTW:
​

​

​

Support me and awesome Jelly Sandwich by pasting these amazing banners to your signature:

​
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] MaxFTW:
Changelog

Changelog:
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] jader13254:
Reserved :D

Just Kidding... Max, did you get Xperia T, or is it just made from System Dump/untested?
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] jimbolee10:
Would love to test Rom but I can't find a cwm recovery. Please help for xperia t
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] jader13254:
Install Krababbels Kernel... We dont know if ROM/Kernel boots, so be carefull.

From my arc S - about a Thanks for an anwser i would be happy :P
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] jader13254:
:( Hehe, LOL, so there is no possibilitie to install :P
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] MaxFTW:
Works 100%

Sent from Jelly Sandwiched Xperia arc S
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] jader13254:
Why You Know thar? :P
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] aj700:
+1
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Pandemic:
Arc and T are both difference phones, so why in the name post this (the OP) photos/videos from an Xperia Arc instead of an Xperia T :s

Best Regards

..:: P@Nd€m!c ::..
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] lokenok:
because OP dosent got Xperia T ....
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Pandemic:
Yes i know but then ne cant test it if it works on xperia t

Best Regards

..:: P@Nd€m!c ::..
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] MaxFTW:
Do you know Supervenom who creates AOKP for arc? I'm sure you do. He doesn't have that phone. That's why I give you this ROM, but I sure it works.

Sent from my Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 with AOKP JB
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] jader13254:
But Its Not tested So There is a Risk that it wont works like some of supervenoms rom also dont work:rolleyes:
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Pandemic:
+1

Agreed :D

Best Regards

..:: P@Nd€m!c ::..
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] MaxFTW:
So just test it...? No risk. Just make a backup and... Flash it. :):):)

Sent from Jelly Sandwiched Xperia arc S
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] jader13254:
But i dont have T :P
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] titooo7:
Then you should delete your motto from th OP:

"The second reason to choose my ROM is the developer. Maxio1998 provides great support and answers users' questions as fast as it's possible. His motto - "No untested firmware will be released from my account". ;)