yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karthikcs:
Problem resolved. I had enabled in settings location service, but I had to change in accounts -google- location
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
@mcm811 new siyah 5 kernel Version available :)

Could you apply your vsync magic and other stuff? :)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] thomsch:
This is the 3rd time you posted this. Stop It please and let him in peace :)

Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Not 100% true. There was a new Version released yesterday ;)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Doesn't it still have camara proplems, shouldn't you wait till its finished first :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] antt00:
Why dun we wait till gokhan complete his kernel before doing anything? Makes no sense for mcm to mod an alpha kernel that is gonna be obsolete in a few hours.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
It has camera probs on samsung stock roms afaik

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
KNOWN ISSUES:

Cam and H/W decoder doesn’t work on Samsung ROMs.

some users reported mtp and adb problems on OSX

Edit just tried siyah v5 2a on vsync off and can't use video cam
[Galaxy S II Android Development] MrMarques01:
Cmon guys, you should know Cobain already. He's always crying like an hysterical kid when something new has been released which hasn't been ported to his fav ROM yet (even though the new feature is still alpha). You guys should really have gotten used to it. :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Do you even know how this works? So MCM is syncing with Gohkan's git repo for 4.1.5, he might not even know there's a Siyah 5 - alpha or not - so why is it bad to ask about this?

Mmm, more noobs throwing $h!t on people with 10 times the experience here, I'm amazingly unimpressed. So what did you ever do to deserve any cred here?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Thanks farmfield. Let the noobs throw their sh**. Someday they'll brick their phones for not reading and then they'll cry.

Btw on which rom are you atm? Latest mcm and siyah or stock? I'm on stock and I think battery is better on siyah.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
I'm on 18/10 + Siyah and (in regards to battery-) ...really?MY battery is actually quite bad with this one... Not an absolute disaster, but I think 17/10 had better battery life.

But it's VERY smooth. Pinch-zooming in the browser is as fast & responsive as on the Gnex, that's very impressive. The Gnex is usually more responsive in the browser.

And just for fun, and as there's no new jb_mali, I'm actually thinking of testing vsync off + Dorimanx, just see if the battery life is as good as some in this thread has reported... I'm pretty sure it won't bee as smooth though, but we'll see... I'll report back. :)

Edit... Are you on stock like stock CM10 + Siyah 5 alpha? Aah, sorry, I misunderstood. Yeah, I bet battery life is better. This last one of MCM's is very nice, really smooth, but as I wrote, not the best battery life...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I tried vsync off with dorimanx to test battery life. I personally found had great life while asleep but screen on I saw no difference. I'm back on vsync sysfs on stock kernel and that battery life seems slightly better than normal but not so good with siyah 4.5 but that's just my device you may find it better
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
I'm on mcm 20. Vsync build with stock mcm kernel. I'll test siyah. Dori kernel was always more laggier than siyah and stock for me.

Guess I'll wait for mcm build with siyah 5 vsync.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] MrMarques01:
If constantly whining about new features and demanding the devs to implement these (mostly alpha and infinished) features ASAP is is a great contribution to this forum then yeah....Cobain has contributed a lot to this thread then.

Telling you to stop torturing the devs with your useless demands will brick my device? Well that's an interesting statement...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
The only one whining here is you. And I seriously don't get your issue here. This is a development thread for a ROM. Reporting bug's and asking for features is what this thread is all about. What it is NOT about is random noops whining. So just stop it.

@IANKC

Vsync off imo sucks monkey butt. So no, I reflashed 18/10 jb_mali sysfs (better battery than 20/10) + Siyah jb_mali sysfs... I don't get how you think stock is OK then, the GUI draw is horrible w/o vsync. Imo...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] itchetrigr:
20/10 battery has been phenomenal for me, first time I'm on my way to 24 hours standby w/ over 5 hours screen time w/ stock 1650 battery. Of course I made some changes with a few tasker profiles to control governer settings while not using the device. Using stock vsync kernel.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karendar:
A dev thread should be dev talk, not necessarily feature request.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Which build? Vsync off? If so, yeah, everyone days it's good, but what's the point running these ROM's w/o vsync...

And if you run jb_mali sysfs and get good battery, maybe it's Siyah 20/10 that sucks...

---------- Post added at 04:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:54 PM ----------

A request is not out of place, though... And I'm also interested to see a modded Siyah 5 and I don't see it as wrong to ask about it... Then, if Changmin wants to build it or not, that's a whole other thing...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mundixx:
**grabs pop corn
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Alef_0:
Bluetooth issue

I tried the 1020 but when I connect to hands-free car gives me error com.androidphone and deactivates the link ...

Any advice?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
Battery life is pretty good with sysfs Vsync and its siyah here.

Over 24h idle and nearly 3h screen on with my OC GPU full sync and wifi ON all the time. it's way enough, no need to switch to a laggier build.

Also, Vsync is all the interest in mcm's builds, we already got official nightlies with Vsync off.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Weird, I find battery life way worse than 18/10 build - perhaps 'inverted placebo', hehe... :D

And yes, I agree about vsync off, though I guess Changmin patches vsync off too - or something - or he would just refer to the nightlies, right..?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Doesn't vsync off still have tweaks from siyah in data files, that could be the difference between that build and nightly but that's just a guess
[Galaxy S II Android Development] toker_X1:
I got 5 hours 47mins today with around 13% battery on 20 JB build and Siyah - WiFi off, GPS on using Golf GPS app for about 4 hours.

Not sure if that's good or bad.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Unexist6969:
& linaro compiled :p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] artie1:
Chainfire XDA via tw : It seems Samsung is saying there will be sourcecode for the needed Exynos parts... I'm not sure it's everything TeamHacksung needs, but I'm sure they'll let us know. It all sounds very promising though. First stuff should be seen in weeks, complete before 2013.

hope is still alive ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Whaaaat?? This must be a joke?!

Gesendet von meinem Nexus 7 mit Tapatalk 2

---------- Post added at 09:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:46 PM ----------

@mcm811 and all other

http://www.sammobile.com/2012/10/21...nos-will-go-open-source/#.UIRNmGlUJEg.twitter

Omfg!!

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] petedaddi:
Espenfjo said:

Oh god.. and there it begins...

Insignal sources / Sources for the Origen board has been quite useless for very many parts of our devices as the hardware is very different.

hwcomposer, gralloc, camera, sensors, hdmi +++ from insignal are not working.

Also the origen board do not have a RIL nor Audio.

Unless they do something dramatically different this time with Insignal, it will be to no use.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Xplodwild is saying the same thing on twitter. Not even close Yamaha audio hal
[Galaxy S II Android Development] carlocarrera:
Xplodwild

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=33092439&postcount=10618
[Galaxy S II Android Development] marcosxd:
Hi Guys, I have been using latest mcm811's build and now I wanted to change back to CM10 nightly + the new version of Siyah Kernel.

I flashed latest nightly and then the kernel but once I boot up, the sdcard (internal storage) is not detected.

Any ideas before I just wipe data and start with fresh CM10 + Siyah? I would like to avoid that. I already fixed permissions in CWM, no help. Thanks
[Galaxy S II Android Development] marbulas:
The announcement from Samsung as sammobile said is about the 'development kit'.

(A motherboard contains APU(like Exynos and Snapdragon) on BGA socket and other hardware interfaces related about to the development)

It will ease app developers who want to make their app for the devices using Exynos APUs. NOT custom rom and kernel makers.

Almost all of the sources custom stuffs makers want is the opensource from specified device(like sgs2) and those are not.

Today's all of mobile OSes are not as variable as PC OSes. They're close to embedded environment.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
why don't you post in the right thread ? like siyah's one, for exemple :).
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karendar:
I luv this thread omg!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
@ marcosxd

Sorry, I'd help you if I could but I got no SD in my device, just the internal memory.

As Codeworkx & Entropy want people to be flamed for this kinda thing, let it continue in the main CM thread, here I thought we were a nicer crowd, I mean, how hard is it?

Imo smaller threads are always 'nicer' than the large ones. I for one left the main CM thread as there's just too many semi-noobish ****les in it. (and why is it the noobs are the worst?)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karendar:
Agreed. I'm just sad things are winding down a bit in here. That and the Nexus 4 will be announced in a few days/weeks. So we might lose a few players to that (Myself possibly being one).
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
This thread has slowed down...

Gesendet von meinem Nexus 7 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
I dunno man, you're sure it's not you having a manic episode? :D

[YOUTUBE]0sGlETQIMUo[/YOUTUBE]

Edit: There is a lot more 'life' right after MCM put something new up, not very strange that we're having kind of a dry spell right now...

Oh, and to get us back on track, 'on topic, I must say that MAN is the 18/10 jb_mali sysfs build (+ Siyah) better in terms of battery life (than 20/10). It's night and day, it really is.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
Right, I agree, but nobody use siyah 5 here, so nobody could answer at what is clearly a siyah 5 issue.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] fr3quency:
Which one? Linaro version with Siyah, or "normal" version with Siyah? has anyone done any combination? :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Linaro was a disaster on my device, the latest 23.09 with the latest Siyah is very nice, extremely smooth - on my device. But you gotta test - it differs quite a bit from device to device no matter which CM10 you try.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Bojcha:
I think i'll stay on 23.09B + Siyah vsync 23.09 :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I say that but updates come so fast.

Another thing I'm not getting superuser problems with new build so far.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] KQ9:
Yo this Linaro stuff is good! No superuser problem as well and for now just trying the stock kernel since i don't think siyah is optimized for it.

Anyway I can say there's a noticeable smoothness in the animations/fluidity, BUT, I haven't tried the normal 23B build so I'm not sure its the new build or linaro. Coming from 19th build + siyah 19th. For now I'm loving this.

For those who have no idea what Linaro is, http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/0...e-and-now-parts-of-it-are-being-added-to-cm9/

recently it was released for JB as a first release.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bluefa1con:
Codeworkx told some time ago that linaro doesn't give that much boost for exynos because of close source drivers

So double performance is being too optimistic :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] KQ9:
Obviously not double performance, if that was the case my phone would be flying to the moon and project butter wouldn't be needed. The double performance claim is for ICS.

Anyway the exynos thing, I wouldn't know :s. Can someone who tried 23B try Linaro build with stock kernel and see if theres any actual noticeable difference?

changmin wouldn't just make a linaro version for no reason right? I mean the dude managed to patch up vsync, I'm sure he knows what hes doing even though hes experimenting.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I'm on siyah vsync but try this build then try nightly and see if you spot the difference
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Don't forget to check app performance, bigger diff there then in GUI performance, Imo...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] fr3quency:
Sadly, I've forgotten my USB cable back in my hometown. FML... Whenever they send it here, I'll gladly test both future versions. :P
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Bojcha:
Search for AirDroid on market.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Or download onto the device and flash. I often do that. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ozgame:
Easiest way of doing it! But don't forget to be connected to wifi haha
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Personally I got 20 Gb's @ 2 MBit for $10 USD / month here - so I don't need to bother with that. I actually downloaded a ROM & flashed it while waiting for a collegue at a coffee shop last week... :D

But yes, if pay per megabyte or have some other limit to your 3G connection, be careful.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ozgame:
I still don't understand why Australia cannot adopt the US system :(
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
What US system? The Americans have among the worst telecom systems in the world, why would you want that? After being over a couple of times during the years, I'm so, so happy I don't live there, hehe.... :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
New builds! Both linaro and non linaro :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] alonso444:
great work very fast and stable the latest version

Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] thomsch:
The siyah attached in xda and the one which is in sourceforce is the same?

Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ozgame:
You havent seen Australia's system! I love the system of paying for the speeds you get rather than the gigs a month!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I had a try on the new nightly today and it was pretty fast. Not as fast as vsync sysfs 20/10 on stock so I'm back on that build but would like to see what the next build by mcm811 will be like with vsync patch :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Siyah 5 works with Vsync off, though I don't really get why you'd run that, hehe... :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Anybody using mcm 20.10 vsync off with siyah 5b1?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Tried nightly earlier and that's sort of the same, wasn't that impressed. Mcm811s mod siyah 4.1.5 seem much better. Always the best opinion is your own tho, so give it a go :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] wini77:
Some of you are saying that 18/10 build + siyah is better then 20/10 but i realy don't see any battery diference ... so i'm sticking with 20/10 until new build
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
There's no battery difference, look at the changelog, pretty much nothing could impact battery life IMHO.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pulser_g2:
Tried new siyah on no-vsync, felt battery was poor.

Back to no-vsync build and siyah (modded) that gave me pretty good life, let's see how it goes
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
In my experience 'that' (*) is as illogical as why cam and/or CRT stops working in some builds. And yeah, I might be wrong, but I don't think so. Today I have 2h screen time over 10h standby with 70% battery life left. (screen time = surfing, facebook, xda, mail over 3G & wifi)

Edit/addendum; (* why some builds have good battery life)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] wini77:
Well for me the vsync rom is a lot smoother then novsync. The novsync is choppy...so I'll stick with the vsync which has decent battery life...

After 17h i have 8% left.

Played angry birds for 1h40min, 35min of calls and some sms,mail,xda..over 2h of screen
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Yeah I run the vsync build too, but the 18/10 build, not the latest...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] PhoenixNZ:
And on your recommendation I've installed 1018 jbmali-oshwc2-vsync_sysf and Siyah-s2-v4.1.5-cm10-jbmali-vsync_sysfs-1018.

Any tips/tweaks suggestions?? I'm using wifi and 3g and phone, small amount of gaming, but forums and bit of web browsing mostly. (not angry birds but bubble shoot.:cyclops:)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Oh yes, I do like this build, it's very nice. :)

And I don't tweak much, for now I'm underclocking 100-1000 MHz and boosting volume, that's it...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] PhoenixNZ:
Hmmmm......Ok, more reading needed. Not sure how to underclock. I thought could only go to 200MHz, at 100 it would stall???, but if could limit the top to 1000 would be alright.

OK, got homework to do to figure this out. Cheers.:good:

---------- Post added at 02:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:36 PM ----------

Awe man!!! Another SOD. Damn it.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Stall? Like a WW1 fighter half way to the top of the world? Naeh, it's not an old engine, hehe... :D

And what, you got a SoD running it at 100 MHz..? I never get those.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] PhoenixNZ:
Nope, hadn't even got to extweak. Only had the phone on 5 min before, then Black screen, no response. Reboot and working well again. SoD is a nuisance.

Found the setting and ramped the CPU down to 1GHz Max. that'll do for now. See how the Battery lasts over the next couple of days (unless there's a new build. LOL.)

---------- Post added at 03:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:37 PM ----------

Oh, and remember reading that Espen (I think) mentioned the power increases when going below 200MHz. So sweet spot on low CPU was 200MHz.

I could be wrong (been told that by the missus enough:rolleyes:) so don't take my word on it.

---------- Post added at 03:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:41 PM ----------

"Google is your friend"
[Galaxy S II Android Development] nasaprinsloo:
And so I have flashed my last build.........

Phone just slipped out of my hand down a 2 story staircase straight to the floor.

Screen is not working, but I've got access to all my files and ringer, usb, everything works fine. just the screen

Not too bad for a piece of plastic right :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bervin:
New build is out guys
[Galaxy S II Android Development] snalfio:
I'm using 1015 build ...it's pretty good:thumbup:

Sent from my GT-I9100 powered by Cyanogenmod 10 and Siyah Kernel 4.1.5
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Thijssie909:
Thanks again for the new build!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] cloak:
I'm running the latest 1023 build now. Till now I always went back to the marvellous 1013 build.

This build feels different. After a day running I can check the battery consumption.

When this is okay I will keep this build.

Thanks for your splendid job, improving our phone:)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Pumpino:
I'm running the CM kernel 3.0.48 on SuperNexus build 5 and whenever I plug my phone in to charge, the screen stays on indefinitely. It occurred with 3.0.46, too. Can anyone confirm this bug, even if it's with a different ROM? Thanks.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Maybe the connection to screen has come away, could look inside

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65pvAINg2ME&feature=youtube_gdata_player
[Galaxy S II Android Development] developersiyahno:
anyone else doesn't have the config.txt file in the 23 build? did mcm miss something or is it a bad flash?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] hoseth0711:
I get symlink error (status 7) when trying to install build 2310. The file is about as big as the other builds so doesnt look like a bad download

Edit: Turns out to be a bad download. Works now

Sendt fra min GT-I9100 med Tapatalk2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bervin:
I'm having this problem too, can someone else please confirm this?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
I have a config.txt in /data

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I downloaded anf installed vsync sysfs 23/10 fine, try downloading again
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bervin:
Thanks, i'll dirty flash over again. i think my kernel cleaning script deleted config.txt
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
So which kernel do you think works better, the stock or siyah?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] screenager:
after dori 7.2 on 13.10 and siyah on 20.10 iam back to stock with 23.10. i dont miss the extra features from dori. siyah was quite unstable on my device. battery life with stock 23.10 is alright so far, sure it can be better. but right know i enjoy the responsivness and smoothness of the mcmbuild:good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
Regarding performances, battery life and smoothness, siyah or stock are pretty equals (unless you overclock or undervolt the cpu in siyah).

I use siyah just because of the BLN and recovery touch.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] marko.maky:
Mcm811 can you add this commit (fixes crt animation) :)

https://github.com/dorimanx/Doriman...mmit/cdf48f045a1d5f6a0cdffc30832ad7eb45ac79d9
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/cm10i9100vsync/files/vsync_sysfs/

Please read this.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] marko.maky:
sorry :highfive: I'm stupid and forgot to read that :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
My batterylife really sux, wonder why the 18/10 is so good and the later builds so bad!? Or it's something with my device and the 18/10 build, they just work awesomely together...