yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] snalfio:
I don't know why, but it happens to me too
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I never suffered from them except in early preview builds but that was ages ago. Plus siyah helps with them doesn't it
[Galaxy S II Android Development] TheSpaceManatee:
By logical deduction as many people preferred vsync without mali for smoothness I think jb mali sysfc is better that ioctl mali? Because vsync Without Mali is sysfs
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
jbmali-vsync_uevent siyahkernel

jbmali-vsync_sysfs siyahkernel

jbmali-vsync_ioctl siyahkernel
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Thanks!! Could you make a cm stock uevent kernel too?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bulldozer1021:
thanks for the instruction.:)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
cm stock uevent kernel is included in the espen's build. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Thanks :). Which do you prefer? Sys or uevent? Which is smoother?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
ioctl > sysfs >= uevent
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
I wish ioctl would be memleak free :)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] TheSpaceManatee:
Isn't it?!

EDIT: oh yeah. But isn't it easy to implement ioctl instead of sysfc? Are they not cross compatible?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
but we don't have source code. :crying:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
So if we get s2 jb source code we'll have it working without leak?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
we'll never have mali source code, it's proprietary.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
you know that vsync_ioctl is based from ics blobs.

it's cause of mem leaks.

we just move to jb. maybe next month?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
+1
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
So the cm nightlies have vsync disabled and your builds have it enabled?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bluefa1con:
Isn't the thread title obvious enough :p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Lol :D

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bulldozer1021:
i flashed the euroskank build.

to check the difference about the battery drain during screen on statement.

but there is black screen :crying:

without factory reset,

from : jb mali + jb mali siyah

to : euroskank or official cm10

can`t boot ?? (just black screen i see...)

anyone experienced same situation like me?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
If your trying mcm811s siyah kernel on another build did you add the .nobootlogo file to your internal storage
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bulldozer1021:
I just flashed stock kernel included in the rom(euroskank and official)

so weired.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] drsoran2:
So if I'am on official nightly and flash a compatible siyah on it (which one would that be?) would it affect the good battery life to one side or the other? and what about performance? I'm afraid that siyah kernel might destroy stuff in nightlys which make the good battery life, but with siyah and extweaks I could again modify the gpu and cpu steps and thus save maybe even more battery.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
I'd like to say that stock kernel is smoother than siyah. Don't know why but it is.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
Linux 3.0.45

Linux 3.0.45
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
What is tge changes from 3.0.15 to 3.0.45, except from the numbers itself. Thanks mcm..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
need to read changelogs from kernel.org
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ktmman:
Ha ha ha, Sneaky Weasel....i don't get it!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
I think I wont ask again. Hahaha!!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] qqqqqq0:
first page 1.post

why and dorimanx?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=31661830&postcount=1

ok? :)

Indeed I wanted to close this thread.

but I don't know how to close this thread.

this thread is not mine.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] qqqqqq0:
ok:)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] magarto:
Where to download the builds? Thanks. I have looked for it and only found kernels.

Enviado desde mi Samsung Galaxy S2 usando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Android Development] hostilevader:
"Fake closed" <- i love it :D

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ktmman:
Looking for the latest version? Download cm-10-20121008-EXPERIMENTAL-i9100-jbmali-oshwc2-vsync_sysfs-changmin.zip (159.3 MB)

Home

Name	Modified	Size	Downloads	Status

Totals: 4 Items

vsync_ioctl	< 11 hours ago

vsync_sysfs	< 12 hours ago

vsync_uevent	< 12 hours ago

cm10-korean	2012-10-06	47 downloads
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
Lol !! Haha!! No link..

Anybody here running on the latest siyah kernel? 3.0.45? How was it?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/cm10i9100vsync/files/vsync_sysfs/?

Sorry It's 1009 linux 3.0.45 kernel.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
It's working great, 250 points more at quadrant.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] AayushDhuria:
Great work man, Seriously, [Not-A-Homo]Love you[/Not-A-Homo] :D, I flashed 1008 buld 2 minutes ago :P
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
Stock or siyah?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] TheSpaceManatee:
Wowowowow you can take over gokhan lol
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
So it's not siyah? Im confused. On the download link it's siyah. Sorry for this noobish like question. :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=32567590&postcount=3714

both
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
Ok thanks man. Linux(3.0.45) is already included on both stock and siyah kernel. :thumbup:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Have you tried using ex tweaks yet, does it work on hybrid kernel
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
Im still on7/10 stock cm/kernel.. But already downloaded 9/10 cm/kernel and siyah. Im waiting atleast an hour because we dont know, maybe mcm811 is making another build right now. Lol.

EDIT: is it the latest 9/10?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
I'll build vsync_ioctl after 2~3 hours.

don't need to wait next vsync_sysfs build. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] huwande1acruz:
Can you sum up please? Or in english please. :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mattisdada:
I have no idea what the difference between ioctl,sysfs and uevent (I believe they're different hooks for drivers inside the kernel, but I'm likely wrong :/) variations are, but I'm running ioctl1008 with Siyah kernel under the same folder, using lulzactive and 1400mhz max freq', and my phone has never felt smoother! Rock stable to!

Fantastic work to all involved! Please keep up the amazing progress mcm811 with these builds, and everyone else at the Cyanogenmod team contributing to make this incredible ROM

We love you all :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] huwande1acruz:
Memo leak version? By the way thanks for this rom. :thumbup::D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
IOCTL is using the old ics mali with ioctl Vsync, it has memory leak, but is working pretty good.

jb mali uevent is using the new JB mali, no more memory leak and uevent Vsync notifications.

jb mali sysfs is also using the new JB mali, but it uses sysfs for Vsync, it drains less battery than uevent.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mattisdada:
Thanks! A fantastic summary :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] TheSpaceManatee:
Can't get anymore... err... english yes that's the right way ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
Orayt!! I'll flash this mali build 9/10 right away.. Anyway, is it known issue mcm with latest siyah? About extweaks that bombaybadboy is telling..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] AayushDhuria:
I love stock kernel :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
No I was just asking if you tried latest siyah cm10 hybrid and does the ex tweaks app work on it. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
But you're already on 9/10 right? What do u mean hybrid? The 3.0.45 siyah?

I think i'll also run on stock kernel.

EDIT: Extweak is always working with siyah right.

EDIT#2: Running the latest 9/10 mali stock and it's a............ what can we expect from mcm811's work? Ofcourse it's great!!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
From what I can see the new kernel is part siyah and part cm10 that kalgecin uses. Haven't flashed new build yet I was just trying a few experiments of my own first, helps with my jb addiction :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GFXi0N:
Stock kernel rocks... with normal settings... I think I need nothing else... thanks for your work, MCM, and glad to have you back... though I don't really see the meaning of the first post... but... whatever... :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
Haha! Im trying my best to avoid that addiction.. Back to the topic, I think as posted from the previous page by mcm, its just a linux update from 3.0.15 - 3.0.45.. And it's still siyah so we can expect extweak will work normally like before.. But still stock kernel is doing the work just fine on my device..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Prashanthme:
Whats in the OP?? fake closed??
[Galaxy S II Android Development] wsoubar:
It's a secret society. And I may say you're in danger now lol

@SGS2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Just flashed latest jb Mali but ex tweaks doesn't work on stock. I only use it for volume increase on headphones so not a big deal :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GFXi0N:
First rule of MCM's club:

Don't talk about MCM's club.

Running today's build already... gets smoother day after day.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bulldozer1021:
mcm811 always try to find the new thing to update his builds.

thanks :D

thumbup
[Galaxy S II Android Development] hoseth0711:
So just to be sure. I have to add the .nobootlogo file to the root of internal storage to get Siyah to boot?

Sendt fra min GT-I9100 med Tapatalk2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] TheSpaceManatee:
Nah its included in the kernel
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bulldozer1021:
mcm811 already disable the bootlogo on boot process.

so you don`t need to make any file in /sdcard anymore.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] hoseth0711:
Thank you guys !

Sendt fra min GT-I9100 med Tapatalk2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
+1

Same purpose here, I only use siyah to increase volume..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
extweaks works without any problem here with the new 3.0.45 siyah.

it's normal extweaks doesn't work if you're using stock kernel,
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I no I'm on new siyah now, just seem like mcm811 is slowly merging both kernels together. It wouldn't supprise me if he manages to get the best of both all in one kernel with his skills :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Anybody who tested siyah 3.0.45 and stock 3.0.45? I'm on siyah now and it's nice..

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
Stock kernel for about an hour now and i can say it's also working great now. Maybe the merge/update on siyah made it to work nice again on mali rom. I might give siyah 3.0.45 a try later..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bulldozer1021:
if mcm811 apply the /res/customconfig/customconfig.xml and other some things

in siyah kernel to the stock cm kernel

we can use the extweaks on stock kernal.

Actually that is not easy way but if he want...

mcm811 can do that i think...:)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
stock + extweaks is siyah.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bulldozer1021:
agreed.

So i use your siyah kernel to use the extweaks feature. :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Stupid question but: did you make siyah smoother? :D. I runs better than previous versions :). Thanks! Will try the stock kernel too...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
I've just figured out my cpu was running at 1200Mhz. 250 points more at quadrant with 200mhz less, even more impressive :p.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
Sorry but I am confused,the upgraded siysh is the last one?:confused:

If missing some hours from this thread you lost it..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
yes,

and I'm in the 7000+ club at antutu \o/

thanks Changmin, you've done the best rom and kernel combo ever :good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GFXi0N:
Better than stock?

Now I have the itch for this kernel.... gggrrrr..... I have to work!!! you know!!!??? :eek:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
Please let me know your settings:eek:

Only CPU to 1400mhz?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
Its 1,400 not 1,200.. Nice benchmark though.. :thumbup:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] galangdj:
Battery Life of MCM build vs CM nightly builds

Just want to know if it's really true that the daily nightlies build by CM are better off than the builds of MCM in terms battery life? I am using the build of MCM + Siyah but haven't really tried with latest nightly build anymore. So just some inputs? :) Thanks a lot.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
I don't know if it's better than the new 3.0.45 stock kernel. I only tested the new siyah so far...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2

---------- Post added at 04:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:53 PM ----------

But isn't 1400 too bad for the battery?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
performance profile, cpu max freq 1400, gpu 160/200/267/400, thunderbolt script, pegasusq / cfq.

that's 100 points better than my previous record using th exact same settings.

@Neil: I benched quadrand before noticing my cpu freq had been reseted to 1200Mhz and had a better result than my previous bench at 1400 with the previous siyah version.

@notkurtcobain: I don't care, it last 18h with nearly 2h screen on @1400 and it's way enough for me. (but I got an anker 1900mah battery)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
Battery life for me doesn't hurt with mcm's build, running with stock kernel i have 14-16hours battery life with normal use and 4hrs or less display time. With siyah, you can extend your battery life by tweaking..

+1.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
I guess your batterylife su**s :p.

Why not sio as scheduler? Let me guess.. for a better benchmark result :p

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] wsoubar:
my max freq is 1000MHz, I'm a heeeeeaaaaaavvvyyy user so, the more battery I get the more I smile..

I'm at stock kernel, just set animations to 1.5x to get smoooooooother and freq to 1000Mhz

I'm happy..

the only thing I miss siyah is to boost my volume ;) but not a big deal
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
18h 2h screen on.

CFQ is better, not only in benchmarks and it's the siyah default one.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Try cfq been good battery life here and pretty smooth other than a few micro lags.

Tried to fight flashing new nightly but lost, I was on it 10 mins and found su bug that was my excuse to put this build back on with siyah vsync
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bluefa1con:
For me siyah has been much better than the stock kernel
[Galaxy S II Android Development] petedaddi:
Loving the smoothness of the build, using 19build and siyah vsync and according to bbs ril is defo present but with @kalgecin builds using same modem its not, any reason or solutions.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] t-pip:
Have you got a link for kalgecin?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] petedaddi:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1803672
[Galaxy S II Android Development] t-pip:
Are you using the Rom , Kernel or both?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] petedaddi:
Latest rom with siyah 4.1.5
[Galaxy S II Android Development] t-pip:
Running 19/9 with siyah vsync goes well but still get between 1 to 5 mins RilJ Wakelock each boot.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] oneheart1975:
isn't that normal? i do not think 5 mins of rilj wakelock each boot will matter much on your battery.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] streetsmart999:
With "cm-10-20120919-EXPERIMENTAL-i9100-changmin" and "Siyah-s2-v4.1.5-cm10vsync-0920" I have No RILJ wake-locks battery has been really good so-far. I use UGLD3 Modem from Bell. (Good for North America) All settings are default.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] snalfio:
damn i'm crying [YOUTUBE]XNBP18nrRdw[/YOUTUBE]

PS: sorry for the OT
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Had to borrow this, some member just opened an iPhone thread so needed something before it gets locked up :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ¶ha€dru$:
nice perk: fast boot times..stock cm10 would get me thinking back to the days of windows 98 booting up

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
New 9/22 experimental and kernels!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mesaj:
Can you also provide Dorimanx kernel recompiled with your patches?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
I am not the dev..

As far I know dorimanx brings issues
[Galaxy S II Android Development] oneheart1975:
Downloading and will test after. :)

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Does new 09/22 have that superuser bug that keeps asking to grant root access or won't give root access
[Galaxy S II Android Development] oneheart1975:
I am using 9/19 and did not encounter that bug.

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
Nope
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
You can use the latest siyah.. Its working good now. It can give you Smoothness + vol boost. ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Awesome. :D

WOW! That is not true. Think, somewhere down the line you might install regular Siyah again, reboot and see the logo, that will melt your eyes. So keep the .nobootlogo just in case... :D

Wow. that is crazy. What do you get on 1200?

When the device gets so hot it start to burn, yes, then fire is really bad for the battery... :D

That say's it all, kinda... Choosing a worse scheduler as you get better benchmarks, hehe... That's just one of 12 reasons why benchmarking is crazy... ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
I think the Max safe freq for the s2 is near 1440mhz.

1500 is not safe,maybe only for one benchmark.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
18h total (to 30%, I always plug it at 30%) with 2h screen on.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Benchmarks are .... It's how well the system runs. Not how fast a game is.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Sorry just read it properly :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Well, SIO makes the system run better but gives lower benchmarks... :eek:

And Game? What game? I don't game. Accept Angry Birds and Fruit Ninja, they work well on way slower devices than the S2 so... ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
Absolutely right, but it's the only way we got to see the perf improvements.

You'll laugh if I tell you I don't play so much on my S2 :p.

It's a geek thing, I've benched everything benchable I got since I was 16. Even gone to extreme cooling on my computer's CPU.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] wsoubar:
some I/O things... I like explanations, not always needed but it's fair lol

http://www.vincentkong.com/wiki/-/wiki/Main/Android+IO+Schedulers

this is from a year ago http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1176334
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
So you mean SIO scheduler is not ok if you're gaming?

Lets just respect each other's preference.. Some people might use/prefer something but others don't.. Anyway, without mcm's build we cant have this chit chat. ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
If I get a fast smooth build with good battery life then I'm happy and newest build with new siyah seems to be doing that so far, 30 mins screen on and 10% battery used, sod benchmarks when you have builds like these :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
Question to all of us..

How can we monitor battery if we're flashing every now and then. Hahaha!! We now that a cycle is needed to fully monitor battery.. Just a question.. lol
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Hehe, I stresstest more than benchmark when I build my machines - but I currently max out everything in Windows 7 scoring accept disks, Corsair hydrocooled 4 core Ivy I7 running at 4.5Ghz, 32Gb's of Corsair Vengeance RAM, EVGA 580 Classified 3Gb (for simulations, CUDA, Mercury Engine acc.)... And I don't run SSD's but SSD-cachedisk, makes the system 90% of an SSD system, but it doesn't show in the benchmarks, sadly... That's the benifits with working with compositing, video and 3D, simulations, when you don't work you'll have one hell of a computer to 'play' with, hehe... :D

But I don't have that need with my phone, with that I just want it smooth and responsive but still have good battery life... :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
You got the point :).

We can't get accurate battery life :).

Damn you again Farmfield, my computer is so old :p.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
It normally gets better with first cycle not worse (well normally :) ) if its good just after a flash it will normally get better unless we make it worse with wrong tweaks

Edit : but personally I have never made it to a first cycle without flashing again :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
What? No, how did you conclude that? I heard from several hi-tec users here that SIO is the best i/o scheduler for performance but for some reason it gives lower scores in the benchmark apps. This phenomena is used by some as proof benchmarking is BS. You get worse scores with a scheduler that is better overall.

Well, my home computer is also my work computer, I do my living on it and I need the performance to do that, seeing what I do for a living. So it's like being jealous of someone having a nice car - when it's a taxi. :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
If your taxi is a porsche, I'll be jealous as well :p.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] confusedmuse:
This did the trick, thanks! I've just renamed the .secondrom folder to .nobootlogo.

This way i can easily get my second rom back when the dualboot feature is fixed. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] galangdj:
TriangleAway working with Siyah Kernel

Just would like to know if TriangleAway app is working with Siyah Kernel? :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kicksilver:
As a matter of fact, the official nightlies have lower battery drain while the screen is on.

While idling, they're alike.

But mcm's much smoother.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Cool, didn't know you could use a folder for that. Smart solution. :)

Yes, that has afaik nothing to do with ROM or kernel at all. On another partition all together I guess.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
1 hour and 19% used with new build and siyah. I also used latest nightly today with siyah kernel from here and 1 hour 24% so close call but this build won :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] nasaprinsloo:
Can someone please post a link to the JB MALi sysfs latest rom.

I'm on my phone and can't remember the site since the OP has been closed.

I already got the siyah latest thanks to another post here.

Will be much appreciated
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kicksilver:
That proves nothing.

Put both in airplane mode, maximum brightness and displaying a white picture por 30 minutes.

Then you can compare.