yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] wsoubar:
don't know dude.. but I do feel stock kernel better than siyah regard battery life...

and I want to try a tweak for lulzactiveq that @robertobsc suggest as better for battery and performance...

-- Parâmetros Lulzactive
echo "90" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/inc_cpu_load
echo "40" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/dec_cpu_load
echo "1" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/pump_up_step
echo "2" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/pump_down_step
echo "40000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/up_sample_time
echo "20000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/down_sample_time
echo "14" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/screen_off_min_step
echo "1" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/ignore_nice_load
-- Lulzactive - Hotplug Queue parameters
echo "50000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/hotplug_sample_rate
echo "13" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/cpu_up_rate
echo "13" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/cpu_down_rate
echo "600000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/hotplug_freq_1_1
echo "400000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/hotplug_freq_2_0
echo "350" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/hotplug_rq_1_1
echo "300" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/hotplug_rq_2_0
echo "0" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/lulzactiveq/hotplug_lock

you guys know if I must define this on a script under /etc/init.d or can I put the script elsewhere and then run it when I want...

other question (remember to be nice, I'm kinda a noob :D )

Do I need to run this script every time I boot my device (init.d) or can I run once and then the parameters will be there till I flash or need to do some change?

Ty guys
[Galaxy S II Android Development] laliluh87:
dont know why but crt works for me for the last few vsync builts :victory:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Ruzzah:
flashed cm10 nightly + siyah 5b1 and while charging phone randomly went 100% CPU usage and battery app said the phone reached 49 degrees Celsius. Wouldn't suggest trying it
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karendar:
It's because 18 is your lucky number!

***Edit*** I still don't know how the hell you guys measure battery life. It's all way too subjective for me to even bother checking.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] malavan:
Farmfield do you have any link to lucky nr 18 please
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
http://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-open-exynos-124617/

Sounds good :)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
It won't help, the S2 is not the dev board.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#/c/25315/

Is it something for you mcm811?

:)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] wsoubar:
I'm at 2310 nightly and it is very battery save

@SGS2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Flashed the new hcw zip from other thread.. :)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
And? Any improvement?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Need new kernel (drivers). Not the hwc alone.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Weird, I'm still on it and it's horrible compared to 18/10... :(
[Galaxy S II Android Development] wsoubar:
My screen time is great, I use 3G network almost all the time I'm on screen...

@SGS2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
OK I don't no if this is connected yet but xplodwild has tweeted about having butter but memory leak back. I no he works with S3 but could be S2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] k1000716:
I thought he was working on the leaked note build? I saw someone had leaked Samsung jb build a few hours ago. If so any work done will directly benefit us.

Lee

Sent from my phone.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I could be wrong as I said, I was just worried about this tweet
[Galaxy S II Android Development] k1000716:
His latest tweet: "Cooking a test build for #n7000 users"

Despite the problems they're having it's quite inspiring to see these devs persevering with Samsung. I'm very happy with the way CM10 is on the S2 now, and it's not even good enough for M builds. It's functional, quick and the few bugs don't really worry me much. Anything from now is just a bonus.

Lee
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
As always I'm always flashing all builds and all combination kernels and trying nightly with new siyah v5.0b+ and its really good. On charge so can't comment on battery yet but should be good with vsync off build, I will try that next :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] webber2109:
Hearing how good battery is on 181012 build, I would like to give it a try.. can any kind soul direct me to the download link?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kicksilver:
It's more placebo than anything..

I measure my daily use.

I go to work everyday, at the same time, using the device the same way. I normally get to the ferry station at 90%, so if I get there with less than that, I suppose the drain was abnormal.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] KQ9:
Latest few builds have been so stable and smooth, I hardly look for new updates nowadays unless I'm bored and I can update lol. Running JB Mali + siyah combo. Only thing I change in extweaks is undervold -25 or -50, activate BLN and the rest is all good. I've tried dorminax 7.2 i think a while back, it was a disaster on my phone :/.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netcitizen:
i have been using this build and happy with it.

But the CM delta updater app is interesting and so i thought i will try the nightlies. Wondering if the mem leak fix is now part of nightlies too. anyone?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Wow where have you been :D memory leak has been fixed a while now but with new Mali drivers it might be making a comeback
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netcitizen:
I know the memory leak has been fixed. but not sure if it was in the nightlies. I have been using this build for quite a while now.

which build are u using ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I ment nightlys, they have been fixed a while now

At the moment I'm on latest nightly with new siyah
[Galaxy S II Android Development] gdskp:
My device freezes randomly and I have to press the power button for a few seconds to let it reboot.

Here is the logcat:

http://www.mediafire.com/?5zj5qoeus8zraek

Latest vsync_sysfs 1023 build with stock kernel.

Thanks.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] carlocarrera:
and its faster ? im running mcm`s latest+4.1.5vsync.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
The new siyah is impressive for speed and smoothness. Battery drain is a little higher tho but I think that's because I left WiFi on and doesn't seen to shut off automatically like dori. Maybe a setting I haven't seen in extweaks but yes that combination is very fast on my device
[Galaxy S II Android Development] carlocarrera:
sry if i ask the same thing twice, but again is it FASTER then our (mcm`s) vsync builds ?

so many times ppl say "xy is faster", then i tried it and...nothing...not faster,laggy all this ****.

so if you would compare ui performance ONLY which one is faster ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Flash mcm 23. vsync build and siyah 23. vsync and flash the note hwc zip. Smoooth.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I found last vsync sysfs build seemed off a little, just didn't seem as smooth as normal ( may be my fault). So thought I would try nightly + siyah v5.0b2+ and yes don't shoot me but as fast possibly more. Should be as good as vsync off + v5.0
[Galaxy S II Android Development] aliander:
Could you help me out with a link to the hwc zip?

Searched around in the Note SubForums, but no luck...

thx!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
http://db.tt/LNcluShb
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
since the note use (I guess) uevent Vsync, shoudn't we use a uevent vsync build to get Vsync working with it ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] DreddJudge:
I'm sorry if this has been asked before but does siyah 5.0b2 work with vsync_sysfs?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Thijssie909:
Vsync ioctl 23 build with siyah is the best ever! No lag at all... :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#/c/25331/

Is this something new for a new build mcm? :)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karendar:
Buggy hwcomposer is buggy.

Graphical glitches in facebook app while typing a message
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Which build?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] andyman_187:
Getting glitches after flashing hwc zip when playing riptide, also some jittery animations on the homescreens. Im on 10212012 build w siyah (sysfs). Anyway to go back to previous hwc w/out having to reflash? TIA!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
I have build 23. vsync with siyah 23. and the hwc zip. No probs

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] itchetrigr:
so i reckon you have not deleted hwcomposer.exynos4.so?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
testing that new leaked HWcomposer, seems to work pretty good actually (sysfs 23 & siyah 23).

maybe a tiny little bit smoother, maybe placebo, but no more redraw bugs I had sometimes on my widgets while swiping through my home screens.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Is deleted if you flash the new hwc

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
for those who're trying this new hwcomposer, how's your RAM right after boot, all apps killed ?

here it looks like it uses slightly less RAM, I had 306MB used, never had it so low before.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] itchetrigr:
ok thanks then its in the binary script already, im getting some graphic glitches with vsync, but all seems fine on nightly
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Duuuude:
Just tried that combo and it is pretty decent but maybe slightly more stutter when scrolling long pages.

But the deal breaker for me is the glitch stutter when playing Ski Safari. :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karendar:
Build 23 sysfs, siyah 23, note hwcomposer, GRAPHICS GO CRAYZEE!! It's like a party on my screen! ZOR!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] DSC05:
Besides the flickering graphics in some games (and for me only in games) I'm deeply impressed of the combo new hwc + 23 sysfs + siyah. IMO there is a remarkable improvement with the new hwc. But of course as always it could be all placebo :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
I have the same BUT all is good..

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Nero325:
I can't read this topic every day and there are lots of posts here...

So, can someone tell me what was improved in the latest releses? I'm still on 1013 and I'd like to update the rom.

Is there a version good like the 1013? For battery and in performance, I mean.

I'd like something that is stable, good performance and more than 15hs of battery

Thanks!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karendar:
Well, it's really sporadic. Happened twice and hasn't since. Otherwise it's A-OK!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Mmm, still on 18/10 build but flashed the leaked hwc... It is smoother, it really is, though you get some GUI glitches if you stress the gui a lot - so no issue for me there. The games though, played a little Fruit Ninja and yeah, glitches galore, hehe - but at the same time, when you don't get glitches it's more responsive... Fruit Ninja always was a bit laggy on Android <4.1 compared to the game on iOS, but it's very responsive on my Gnex and almost as good on the S2 now, but man does it glitch, hehe... Andgry Birds was a little less glitchy, but that is far from ar graphics intensive as Fruit Ninja, so no surprise there...

But what I like is that now we know for a fact that 4.1 on the S2 is gonna be real smooth & responsive when they get it all 98% 'there', the CM guy's. That'll take some time I guess but I'm in it for the long run, I love the S2, even with the 'blamesamsung' crap, hehe... :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karendar:
I get stuttering in Fruit ninja, no grapics glitches... It's pretty random. But let's just say the blob needs some work to fix the "issues".
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Stuttering, glitches, potato, potato, banana, milkshake. :D #semantics

But it's 'potentially' smoother & more responsive, that is NOT placebo. I think. ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karendar:
HEY! Keep your banana out of my milkshake! Or I'll sue!

Just plugging the blob without doing any work in the background is prone to have some issues... But over time, we might get something more solid.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] nat510:
very smooth here!

but sometimes whatsapp have blank screen glitches
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Sue? What are you? Apple? :D

Yeah, this 'hack' is imo a sign that there is potential - and we're not so far of a really good daily driver if something like this makes a noticeable difference. I mean, the 18/10 build I run is very, very solid, but I miss that extra little smoothness in the Gnex (w/ CM10 + Franco)...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karendar:
No, I'm milkshake and you're banana. GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT :laugh:

That's how the non AOSP phone rolls. :P Hopefully Samsung will do good on their word with the JB release.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Like the commit imnotkurt dug up, hope mcm might have a look at it

http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#/c/25331/
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Rick Roll:
I've got some glitches with mcm's builds, nightlies are fine.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] cnn888:
i just want to share my experience. i have been using this patched cm10 for long time. at first i really felt the difference between this build and the official build. today, out of curiosity (on the progress and battery life sake, i found last couple builds doesn't really hold the battery as before), i flashed the unpatched original cm10, together with siyah v5 then change to dorimanx 7.4.1 coz i don't like the jaggied display with siyah.

honestly, i can't feel the difference anymore. i don't feel any stuttering as before as i don't feel it with jb mali patched vsync off version nor the vsync-sysfs. so, i don't know if it is placebo or anything. does anyone of you experience this? i mean i don't know how to measure the fps, so it could be just my eyes....

tomorrow i will know about the battery life....:D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Agreed. Imo the 18/10 build is the latest with good (or even GREAT) battery life. 20- & 23/10 is as smooth and everything, real nice, but they have way less battery life. And I know, nothing to indicate that would be something connected to the changes in BBQ but it's absolutely something, the 18/10 is one of those builds where you get a nuclear reactor included in the ROM. :D

Edit: Just uploading the 18/10 build to www.farmfield.se/ROMS/ for you those wanted it. And you're welcome! :)

(also uploaded the Galaxy Note JB leak HWC. Just flash it in recovery.)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
It looks like a without vsync.

work fine with vsync_off kernel.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
LOL, really? Feels really smooth with the 18/10 jb_mali sysfs build... Placebo. It's all to deceptive... :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
1024 build will be included it.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
Please let me know you opinion about hwc.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I may be really mistaken (it happens often) but doesn't feel like placebo, it feels real. It might not be ready yet but just feels different

That's with vsync off build
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
But I think your vsync build with siyah vsync is smoother with the note hwc! Guess placebo ;). Will the 24. build be online in 2 hours? I ask 'cause I'm on a trip to seattle. From europe lol ;)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] savagemoonlight:
Using the latest sysfs vsync build with siyah. I flashed the hwc zip last. But it seems that the UI and whatsapp are more jittery with the new hwc. Wonder if theres something wrong?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Gustavo_s:
New hwc really feels smoother, with some glitches, but good enough for me
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
use note hwc + vsync_off kernel.

it use less battery.

vsync_off kernel removed "s3c-fb-vsync thread" and unset "CONFIG_SYNC,CONFIG_SW_SYNC,CONFIG_SW_SYNC_USER" from kernel config.

it is difference between vsync_off build and official nightly build.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
But is it smoother with the vsync off kernel? Doesn't the note hwc work with the vsync kernel? Looking forward to your 24. build ;)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Nero325:
Can you upload also the related siyah (18/10)?

Also a little up:

I can't read this topic every day and there are lots of posts here...

So, can someone tell me what was improved in the latest releses? I'm still on 1013 and I'd like to update the rom.

Is there a version good like the 1013? For battery and in performance, I mean.

I'd like something that is stable, good performance and more than 15hs of battery

Thanks!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] WhoIsJohnGalt1979:
Request you to kindly update the "Read Me" section in the source forge site as to what build contains what after integrating note hwposer. :)

Thank you.

Regards.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
note hwc is not using vsync.

work with vsync_sysfs kernel.

but don't need vsync_sysfs kernel.

vsync_off kernel is better combination.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
I'll change to vsync_off build use note's hwc in 1024 build.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Sry, I don't have it - I personally run the 18/10 jb_mali sysfs build with the 23/10 Siyah jb_mali sysfs and it works perfectly.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
For your collection 18/10 siyah jb Mali sysfs

http://db.tt/xTjXOrBB
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
LOL - I actually deleted it (and a few other ROM's/kernels) as I uploaded the latest files. There is seriously no difference, just run the 18/10 sysfs with the latest Siyah sysfs, it works lika a dream. :)

(but thanks - it's the thought that counts! :D)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I have a habit of deleting old builds but I keep forgetting to delete old kernels. I have them all over in different folders on my storage. I need a good clear out some time :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] BlackRainX:
Kinda dumb question on which build to use that Exynos4210 HW composer?

Vsync_off

Vsync_ioctl

Vsync_sysfs?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bervin:
Vsync_off
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Vsync off but 24/10 build when uploaded
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Spiralzz:
Warning! Placebo effect in high concentration!! :D read Entropy's explanation for those who just swapped the hwc:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=33226599
[Galaxy S II Android Development] itchetrigr:
he pretty much debunked this whole thread...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Unexist6969:
Hmmn, so does the upcoming ioctl vsync rom use note HWC Note mali driver (with memleak) and linaro, that could be the smoothest/working all together?:p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mixailo:
Correct me if im wrong, but vsync added to theese builds prevents tearing regardless of the framerate?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Yeah, as I understand it, the next build might be the one with the most placebo so far. We'll just have to wait and see how gullible we really are. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] carlocarrera:
+1

but im so sure, the first time i tried, it was like night and day...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] marbulas:
Today's tip in use...

You should get the files in /data/property into the original one if you change the CM based roms and kernels as different.

Properties stacks everytime from setpropping by kernel or rom or you did could make lags and other untouchable probs.

And these properties are NOT able to reset with any functions in recoveries except data reset... and you really don't want to do that to delete just some files like those :D

Just reset yourself. Change them.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
New Angry Birds Seasons levels today equaled 3-1/2 hours of Angry Birds game play and I still got 10% juice left... :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] antt00:
Just to inform, no-vsync + new note mali hwc have the same graphic glitches in games as vsync + new note mali hwc. :eek:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mammenj:
Is it safe to flash vsync off new over vsync stock without wipe?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] nat510:
backup and wipe cache & dalvik cache
[Galaxy S II Android Development] artie1:
build 24 is absolutely amazing, with hwc & volume bug fixed.

mcm, you are a god!

tyvm;)

sent from beyond
[Galaxy S II Android Development] antt00:
Yes u can. I switched between those 2 roms a few times without any issues so far.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] cnn888:
i call it dirty flashing.... it's fine...

even you don't wipe, the script will still delete the /system folder, cache and dalvik. so, it is (completely) safe.....
[Galaxy S II Android Development] thomsch:
Mmm, volume bug it isn't fix here

Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Kikko2000:
New audio blob broke recording :

http://goo.gl/UPt4Y
[Galaxy S II Android Development] DSC05:
Maybe these vsync things are actually useless (I'm not sure), but I think almost everyone who flashed mcm811's builds know that these builds run better than official nightlies. Maybe because of his configs, maybe because of linaro or maybe because of something else (like vsync:p). So, I don't want to miss changmins excellent work.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mammenj:
I am not seeing much difference in performance with the new note hwc, probably too early for a verdict but the home screens were jittery compared to the vsync build:eek:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I had the odd small graphical errors, if it fails to load how can they be explained. As I have said it needs work. No hwc doesn't cause those errors
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ¶ha€dru$:
dorimanx + no sync is great. just a few more options than siyah that make the difference for me

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bervin:
@mcm

do you have anything to say regarding what entropy said about hwc? if it's true wouldn't it be best to revert back to previous vsync off of using ics blobs?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] MrMarques01:
Of course not. The new HWC has some dependencies from other libs which are not resolved yet. Therefore the new HWC simply fails to load. It's like running the ROM without any HWC.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] TheSpaceManatee:
I find scrolling through screenshots in GPlay super buttery and I'm not kidding.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
@mcm811 is it possible to add your vsync patch to the new siyah 5.0b2. I have been testing it a few days now on vsync off and battery drain is a little more but its really good. That's just asking if its possible not asking you to do it :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
no more Vsync builds ? :(

I don't care about what entropy said, testing Vsync off + dorimanx right now, it's fast, incredibly fast, but vsync sysfs is waaaayyyyyy smoother, it's obviously not placebo.

also this new hwcomposer is buggy, I got a f**ckton of stuttering in games, it's totally unplayable.

I revert to last sysfs vsync build.