yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
In regard to the BRICKBUG

Check the main 10-1 thread - have the CM guy's taken care of it? 'Cause you can be pretty sure that MCM would probably NOT solve the brickbug if the CM team hasn't done it. He might have, but probably not.

So NO. It's probably NOT safe if you got a brickbug device. I myself don't so I don't give a f***...

(and yes, it gets amazingly annoying when it's all speculation BS - if you got the bug, check it the f*** out BEFORE you flash 10.1)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Is this useful for us :)

http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/28146/

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] hectorviov:
Hopefully it will be...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Unexist6969:
just checkd with the app from playstore and got ''insane chip'' , I fully wiped the kernel and internal sd and didn't brick, so it's probably safe if you believe me :p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] readon1:
Yes, the same here. And it didn't brick...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sidrocks89:
I don't know why is it so hard for mcm to just specify it in the 1st post as in all the other ROM threads.

If, I hope not, someone wipes data/factory reset and bricks his device, he'd probably say WTF mcm I bricked my device because of you.

It's better to specify it than to face such consequences.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
Having the best reception ever since 10.1.

See how it's almost all green compared to how it was before ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Having an insane chip doesn't guarantee it will brick, but it will brick easily.

So what you guy's are saying is you did something stupid and were lucky. That's not the most impressive thing, hehe... :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] shaunnicho:
Its weird how some s2's have a sane chip and some have the insane chip when they're meant to be the same phone lol

Sent from my I9100 using the latest cm10 nightly
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Unexist6969:
Maybe I'll force brick it before my warranty ends on 31-12-2012, but that might be the last day of our lives lol
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Yeah, but seems the userbase is all insane, so at least that is consistent. :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Unexist6969:
samsung is using cheap 3rd party emmc chips because they we're out of stock ;p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sidrocks89:
That's what I was trying to say without using harsh words. If it's not confirmed then you can't say it doesn't have a brick bug until you get bricked :P

anyways if it doesn't have a brick bug then its good for us, but mcm can only tell that.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] diddly3000:
is this brick bug thing in 10.1 versions of this rom or both?

also where can i view changelog of the cm-10-20121212

thanks
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karendar:
First time installing CyanogenMod 10.1 to your Galaxy S II, or coming from another ROM:

- Make sure you're NOT RUNNING A KERNEL WITH THE MMC-SUPERBRICK-BUG. If you're unsure, flash this ClockworkMod-Recovery using Odin/Heimdall.

If you really think Cyanogenmod team would release a build on XDA that has brick bug, you guys are even more insane than the emmc chip. :D

Seriously, they wouldn't risk it.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sidrocks89:
Anyways I made a backup and flashed it, just in case :silly:

And I've to say it's better than any other builds, very smooth and responsive.

Just the quick settings icon disappears from the notification drawer after some time. Anyone knows how to bring it back?

---------- Post added at 06:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:33 PM ----------

mcm already posted cm10.1 with a brick bug once and removed it later. Who knows what has he done now until he speaks out.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Cool. So now ppl know.

As I said, I don't have the chip so I don't care, but people need to know what the h*ll they're getting themselves into, take some personal responsibility and check this stüff out before they do stupid $h!7... Really annoying when it's speculation.

At least now they have some facts. Tnx for that.

---------- Post added at 06:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:39 PM ----------

Well, I'm at least pretty sure he didn't put the bug back into the kernel, hehe... :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sidrocks89:
Okay, figured it out. 220 dpi brings it back :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Muchoaliento:
CM 10.1 NIGHTLIES READY ???????????????

http://changelog.bbqdroid.org/#i9100/cm10.1/next
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karendar:
mcm posted a pre-release of mr1-staging code which was NOT meant to be released. The current build is with the current unofficial repo from the CM team, which they released themselves. If they release it, you can be sure there's no brick bug in it. Like I said, they would NOT risk the mayhem of releasing something that would destroy your phone.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Plus its cm team we are talking about here not Samsung ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Could. In a worst case scenario. If you were unlucky.

Honestly, taking the lack of common sense in these user threads into consideration, I think bricking your phone due to plain retardation is about as big a chance as due to the brick bug...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karendar:
No, WOULD. Custom recoveries trigger the brick bug systematically on wipe... Stock recovery is more COULD... ;) Unless you mean that not everyone wipes. WHICH IS UNPOSSIBLE. :eek: hehe

I love being a smartass with you. And you love being a smartass with me... I'm gonna miss you, man.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Orginator:
mcm has released new builds, 18 hours ago! ;) (thanks)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Really? As I heard it, it was always a 'worst case scenario' thing, not as set in stone as your statement. Well, good I don't have an insane chip then, only an insane brain. In the membrane. :D

That sounds ominous. You know something that I don't? Did the CM team finally put that hit out on me? I know I should have held back with OT in the main thread.... :eek:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] karendar:
No, I'm leaving you for another Android, remember?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Pfeffernuss:
Where! :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Many hours ago...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
In a 2-dimensional universe that could actually have been a correct answer, but not in ours. :D

I'm actually not an android, I'm a cyborg. There's a difference.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Pfeffernuss:
I'm missing the humor, but that's my mistake I guess.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Orginator:
CM 10.1 with Siyah v4 = No GSM (phone.android.com), No internal SD, the rest "seems" to work

mcm possible to get this running? I've seen that mcm uploaded his kernel, so maybe preparing for Siyah :P
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
But why are you asking where, it's not like it changed since the first post!?

http://sourceforge.net/projects/cm10i9100vsync/files/
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Pfeffernuss:
MFG. Been running that Rom since it's on there.

But things like this, half an hour ago, suggest there's again something new out. Hard (for me at least) to understand that somebody is talking about 18 hour old stuff.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Yeah, that's all about the earth being round, people working, sleeping on different times and all that, so they find $h!7 out at different times. You being so stressed out about it isn't a good sign - so just calm down, that's my advice.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Pfeffernuss:
Stressed out != enthousiastic about a new Rom. That's all basically.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Not new ROM. New build. You're taking flashoholism to new levels even for this thread. :D

And who's on CM10 anyways, when 10.1 is so much better..? There's a '1' in the end and everything.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Freedomalfa:
is only from me or the download speed is slow ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Was fast. Probably many downloading now... Great build! Amazing work buddy!! Thanks for all your work! *highfive*

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Anyone tried browser video yet like youtube, does it fc on this build
[Galaxy S II Android Development] vpraveenis:
I downloaded fast.. but my ftp to local machine is painfully slow and taking time to copy. Wait for a Googledrive mirror in 10 mins.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Fc are gone :) *five*. Great build so far :)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] vpraveenis:
Google driver mirror

cm-10-20120926-EXPERIMENTAL-JB_MALI-i9100-changmin

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B_84NdCTzAJDQV9jakNLSGFxeWM
[Galaxy S II Android Development] TheSpaceManatee:
The new build is the best cm build ever its like milestone 1 standard!!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] maxl96:
So that means HwComposer is fixed and Butter is working? :cyclops:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Hellmet:
So this is needed? :

cm-10-20120926-EXPERIMENTAL-JB_MALI-i9100-changmin.zip and kernel-cm-10-20120926-i9100-changmin-signed.zip

Been confusing with all the kernel talk back and forth.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pimser:
download always stops at ~50%. to many downloads?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] californicated:
Is game performance comparable with CM9?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Daft*mau5:
Now I'm confused :what:

If I want to use the smoothest version do I use the vsync only version or the vsync with espen's mod version and with which kernel do I use it with the modded siyah or stock kernel
[Galaxy S II Android Development] DSC05:
I'm pretty sure that you don't have to flash an extra kernel over the newest build with fixed memory leak.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] maxl96:
Vsync patched means Butter working?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Just flash the rom. Kernel is already included.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Freedomalfa:
butter is not fixed yet, but the mem leak is fixed and the vsync is like butter
[Galaxy S II Android Development] vpraveenis:
Dropbox MIrror

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/dk5wy5xy...20926-EXPERIMENTAL-JB_MALI-i9100-changmin.zip
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
After flashed the 26/9 Mali and siyah 26/9 the device don't boots after the siyah logo,I retry to flash again but the same,restored to 26/9,what's going wrong?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
The 26. mali build is the BEST cm10 rom for S2 to date. It's just WOW!

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] minidou-77:
Can I use this build with a custom kernel and still have the awesomeness of the Espen changes (no mem leak) and Vsync ? (If I use Dorimanx)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Jordan2012:
Has anyone got hold of a Siyah for 10.1 the last one only FC's com.android.phone or is it only stock one holding it at the moment?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Unexist6969:
Only stock
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Pfeffernuss:
I know it's literally impossible and blasphemy but I prefer CM10 over CM10.1 for now... Tried it numerous times. Maybe again tomorrow but for now really couldn't be much happier... :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] 22sl22:
battery life

Out of curiosity, how long does your battery last?

I find that this is the best rom for battery life (my own opinion). I am using the 6/12 build and get around 14 hours with the following:

Stock kernel, no under/over clocking

Screen on for 2 hours in total

Quite a lot of internet use and music (apollo)

A few other apps....

I don't really care about performance and benchmark scores in my opinion, as long as the phone can run multiple apps or heavy games with no lag (which it does)

I am also using the stock 1650 mah batery
[Galaxy S II Android Development] diddly3000:
is it safe to flash cm10.1 from staging folder??????

and is it worth a flash :p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Why shouldn't it be safe?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] diddly3000:
was reading something about brick bug but wasnt sure what caused it haha.

is 10.1 stable enough to flash or is it very buggy seen as its early stages :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
stable enough to be my daily driver since nearly 3 days now.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] diddly3000:
perfect thanks :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sidrocks89:
Is very stable as a daily driver.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] KcLKcL:
Sorry if it has been asked so many times, but I've used search and I couldn't find exactly what I look for :/

I wanna flash the Vsync version of CM10 (NOT 10.1), which build is the best? You guys said it's 27.11.12 build, but I just want to make sure.

Also, can I use Dorimanx kernel instead of Siyah for the Vsync build? Will Vsync broke of I use Dorimanx instead of Siyah Vsync & Stock Vsync Kernel?

Thanks
[Galaxy S II Android Development] m1trand1r:
u can use config from my xda sig and flash it with no worries at all...as it's the best for me till date (i'm not switching to cm10.1 yet)...build is 12/06/2012 and DorimanX v 7.29 (latest with vsync enabled)...so...just a suggestion...

EDIT: nothing'll go weong as long as u use DorimanX v 7.29...nothing will be broken:cool:

Sent fom my S-II with CM-10 by mcm811(12/06/2012] powered by [url="http://dorimanx.shine.sk/kernels-jb/Kernel_Dorimanx-V7.29-ICS-JB-22-51--06-12-12-SG2-PWR-CORE.zip]DorimanX kernel v 7.29[/url]
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Cosmin G.:
loving 10.1 ! I'm pleased with this rom. It has some occasionally few gliches when scrooling, but that's all! I'm curious about battery usage. will see!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] KcLKcL:
Ah cool thanks man, will try it to flash today. Cheers!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Cosmin G.:
wait... where are the Developer settings and Performance ???
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
3 days. That's like years in flashoholism time. :D

They are hidden behind the crouching tiger. 7 tap's on the system > about phone > build number and the hidden dragon will not show up. But the developer options and performance options will. :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Orginator:
Latest ROM plus Siyah v4 (2711), that works very smooth, is stable and has great battery!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Cosmin G.:
LOL! this is a samsung thing or CM thing ? :)) thanks!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
It's an Ang Lee thing. :D

(or if it's not, I dunno. CM? Or Samsung. Not really that important either, hehe...)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] djsky2011:
Not merged yet
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Cosmin G.:
I messed up... I went in Developer settings and checked 'simulate secondary display' and now the display image freezed... I tried to restart the device but when it pass the logo, freezes... I think it remained on simulate secondary display option. I can't manage to go in recovery mode, it boots normally till freezes...

EDIT: finally managed to boot in recovery mode. reflashed the rom. still freezing!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] JohnBonchie:
Happened to me as well. Full wipe is what i did:mad:

Lessob learned. Don't mess w something you don't know
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Cosmin G.:
I will try to flash the the cm 10 build (mmc version) to see if works. don't want to full wipe...

EDIT: done a full wipe... now restoring my latest backup. lesson learned.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
What? Yes they are. Settings > About Phone > Build Number (tap it 7 times) - et voilà.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] AayushDhuria:
I'm NOT on this ROM, But I used to get around 20-24hours in total with 4h screentime and yes a lot of music, (Poweramp) Wifi 60% time on :) No major undervolting stuff.

EDIT: And yeah, I never compromise with performance for better battery life.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] thejonesyboy:
Is is safe to use Siyah-v4-vsync_sysfs-changmin-1212.zip with cm-10.1-20121212-EXPERIMENTAL-i9100-vsync_sysfs-changmin.zip?

Is there any major difference between kernel-cm-10.1-20121212-i9100-vsync_sysfs-changmin-signed.zip and kernel-cm-10-20121212-i9100-vsync_sysfs-changmin-signed.zip? I guess if there is a difference, then Siyah-v4-vsync_sysfs-changmin-1212.zip will not have it... and we need to wait for vsync Siyah for 10.1...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Orginator:
Siyah is not ready for cm 10.1 and it won't work with it. There's a reason you don't have Siyah in the CM 10.1 directory, lol
[Galaxy S II Android Development] grafenberg:
Any link to inverted gapps for this 4.2?

Or can we use the 4.1?

Thanks...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] thejonesyboy:
Which is exactly why I was asking, lol
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
It's eons :silly:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] SuperBoUDS:
This is Google's thing. It happens on my Nexus 7 as well. I think Google just want to hide developer options from normal user.

CM 10.1 is Android 4.2 and CM10 is just Android 4.1.2.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Hrithan2020:
@mcm811,

Please add the AOKP feature which your patched CM 10 was having viz. the option to use screen softkeys instead of the hardware buttons. My phone's hardware buttons don't work sometimes.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1645600

edit or create /data/local.prop

add this

and reboot phone
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Hrithan2020:
Thanks a ton :)..

Any way to enable the additional search and menu keys as well? [ there was an option to enable them earlier, under settings]
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Holgott:
Is Display->daydream working at some1s phone? Tryed the dimmed clock when Phone is charging but it never appeared. Maybe i misunderstood the function but how i unterstand it has to Show up when the charger is connected
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Mcm is the new 13.12. siyah for 10.1?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
From the readme:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] thejonesyboy:
Sorry I wasn't too clear about what I was asking. Basically just wondering if there was any change in the kernel from 10 to 10.1, because this would imply that the Siyah kernel for CM10 might not work for CM10.1

Alas, mcm's new build Siyah-v4-vsync_sysfs-changmin-1213.zip (15 minutes ago) seems to be working for me on 10.1!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] akira.pwr:
Could someone provide a link for a Kernel with dual boot? I don't know if original Siyah 5.0.1 can be good for this rom. As first rom I'm using Revolt rom.

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] m1trand1r:
I don't know who could do that...maybe @GM when he'll make a new kernel which will hopefully support CM10.1 with dual boot...otherwise i think there isn't any as of now:eek::p

Sent fom my S-II with CM-10 by mcm811(12/06/2012] powered by [url="http://dorimanx.shine.sk/kernels-jb/Kernel_Dorimanx-V7.29-ICS-JB-22-51--06-12-12-SG2-PWR-CORE.zip]DorimanX kernel v 7.29[/url]
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Bkam13:
Hey, can I install camera + gallery app from 4.1 on the 4.2 ? I hate that new camera I prefer the old one.

Envoyé avec mon Galaxy S2 via Tapatalk.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
New cm10.1 build thanks mcm
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Siyah 4 finally on 10.1 :))) Thanks so much mcm for this epic combo!!!

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] huwande1acruz:
Hey INKC, why dont you use siyah v5? siyahv4>v5 ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
@mcm is this already included in your 13.12. Kernel?

http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/28115/

http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/27561/

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2

---------- Post added at 09:05 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:05 AM ----------

For me siyah 4 is smoother and more battery friendly! Try it

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
Please let us now your settings:)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] huwande1acruz:
Ok, i think i will give a shot v5 and v4 to compare whats give the best battery life for my device. Thanks!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
The answer is "Memory 818 MB"
[Galaxy S II Android Development] himzz0007:
i am on samsung official 4.1.2 rooted with philz kernal i try to install this rom in philz recovery couldnt install can someone help me how to install this rom
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
I thought that :)

Great work buddy!!

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
Flash the Siyah kernel, wipe data, format system, flash mcm rom and then wipe catche /dalvic/fix permissions.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Pegasusq and sio and -25 uv

Gentlefair sleepers disabled

Gpu steps 160, 160, 200, 267 with 900 900 950 1000 mv

Bln disabled.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] himzz0007:
can u send me the link of which siyah kernal
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/cm1...yah-v4-vsync_sysfs-changmin-1213.zip/download
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Has someone already installed build 13.12.? Is the app switcher bug still there (long press menu button)?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
Seems fixed.

Stweaks don't works,when apply changes and close the apk then when open again the changes hasn't applied.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Sure about that? Did you full wipe before installing cm10.1? Reset your extweak settings in recovery and try again!

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
Stweaks not included when flashed the last build and siyah and downloaded from play store, strange..

Yes, i have done wipe data when installed 10.1 first time.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] renguer0:
Confirmed, same problem here.

EDIT: I'm using Siyah v4.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Floydfire:
Confirmed here doesn't remember the change but apply...

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
I installed and the extweaks, reset via recovery and then when opened the extweaks showed me message that the apk has broken in the current kernel.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Perhaps MCM could look into that...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Thijssie909:
+1 v5
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Hope mcm can fix this bug...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ugokind:
Hy

Is there a changelog/feature list?

I'm actually on 4.0.3 with callrec feature..

Can i use that rom..does it have inbuild callrec?

Bye

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mcm811:
updated siyahkernel v4, v5

fix missing /sbin/ext/post-init.sh in /res/misc/init.cm10.1/init.rc
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
You are a GOD! :). THANKS mcm!! One of the greatest devs ever..

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2

---------- Post added at 11:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:21 AM ----------

Is it possible to have vibration on lockscreen. JUST the lockscreen, not the soft buttons eg

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] TheSpaceManatee:
Huh? CM 10.1 can run on siyah?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] drsoran2:
Would like to know too.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] readon1:
Settings >lock screen >security >scroll down