yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I'm a fan of cm10 to and just waiting for some decent change, 4.2 or audio bug to be fixed but all I have seen is a cwm update. Think even devs are starting to think sod it
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
logic: the leak doesn't have Vsync nor triple bufering.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
And I ask again.. Why no vsync and tripple buffering.. It's THE main reason for jb

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Orginator:
Not that I know, but one could only guess this is related to spending resources.. like maybe to enable proper support for the JB enhancements they would need to rewrite a major part of the drivers, hwc...?

Old device gets the JB "visible" features while not touching the "engine", most probably won't know anyways what is going on under the hood :P
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Main reason? I disagree... And I'm also gonna repeat what I was flamed for in the main CM10 thread, hehe... If vsync is on, you won't see any difference from loike 30fps and up on a 4.3" screen, there's just no way. What people are saying about motion blur being a factor is just BS in regards to this size screen as motion blur in 90% would be sub-pixel size... So yeah, you'll notice it in slow-mo films but most of us won't notice any difference between a fully functional 'butter' and 30+ fps vsync... :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
I agree, 57fps is 90% of the butter project thing, but it's only 90%, so it's fake butter, and it do is noticeable (ok, barely, but it is).

what I only said is that Vsync eats battery when screen is on, so that's logic that the leak does better screen on time than mcm's build.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Unexist6969:
If you set higher gpu steps or low thresholds on non vsync rom u have butter too comparable with vsync with lower gpu steps

I need to put gpu atleast to 330mhz to run a game without lagg, or most ui lagg at all.

But with vsyncbuild it's smooth with 200mhz-267mhz max, vsync is eating battery but project butter in whole is just a battery drainer :P live with lagg and have better battery life or get addicted to vsync/cpu/gpu hooks aka butter

But making a nonvsync rom smooth you will have to increase gpu steps to get buttery like this which cause even more battery drain then vsync ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
I for one did NOT have better screen time with the leak. The battery life just sucked all over. And I got great battery life with the last MCM build.

Once thing though, Angry Birds is one hell of a battery drainer in CM10 - it wasn't using the leak. Perhaps that has to do with butter/vsync, I don't know, but Angry Birds didn't use battery at all on the leak and also didn't heat up the phone like in CM10...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I may be wrong but I'm sure that cm10 can't access full potential of the dual core of our devices but Samsung can. That maybe cause of heat up.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Yeah, it's just a question of aligning the thingamajig and it'll stop heating up. Someone buy the CM guy's a wrench already! :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Unexist6969:
Or just force duel core ;)

My 1st core is probably already ripped down and abused but my 2nd core is brand new :P all because of no exynos source :screwy:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Bojcha:
Totally WRONG! And i will not explan you.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Yes. 20 years as a professional graphic and video editor has obviously tough me absolutely nothing that gaming nerds don't know better. :D #lessthanimpressed

(I mean, it's not like I'm, as we speak, are rendering 3D motion blur in the background here - or is it. ;))
[Galaxy S II Android Development] nasaprinsloo:
lol - makes perfect sense
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GFXi0N:
Weird: I have been using a version of this rom that dates from the beginning of this week more or less....

before that, i have been using the different versions more or less flashing on a daily basis.

The last days, I have been using the phone just for normal things and didn't flash or anything... I actually didn't have enough time for even playing.... suddenly, tonight, my phone didn't come back from a deep sleep... I had to pull the battery...

Now, if I start the phone, the blue loading bar reaches the end and nothing happens.... no recovery but download mode seems to be working..

I'm downloading the leaked 4.1.2 official rom to try revive it.....

Did anyone experience the same?

What could have happened?

I hope I didn't get a brick....:rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Does not sound like fun at all. Please keep us updated with how it goes. Keeping my fingers crossed. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GFXi0N:
Sorr for the OT.... I am afraid I have been affected by the nand r/w corruption bug....... I'm trying to find a way to fix it... if anyone feels like helping, feel free to send me any pm...

Sorry for the OT... :crying:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] AayushDhuria:
I faced this issue once too, were you on siyah? I was successfully able to reproduce the bug just to trest it.

---------- Post added at 05:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:18 AM ----------

PS just flash, I have USB jig, I got into download mode n flashed Stock Samsung ICS, I always keep an Odin sick ROM for emergency

---------- Post added at 05:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:19 AM ----------

I'm sleepy mate, its 5:22AM here, I'll just post what happened with me, My battery died, and after I charged it fully, I tried to switch it on but it went to black screen after Blue bar, wasn't going to recovery by key combo, ADB wasn't recognising it. But then I used USB jig to get into download mode and it saved my ass. It had something to do with .nobootlogo file that I had in SD root. Tried the same again with Siyah n it didn't not up. Then I just flashed normal Siyah(not vsync one) via odin and it went to recovery via Key combo. N then flashed the ROM n kept sock kernel. (Just to save myself from the trouble of flashing ICS n rooting again) and its 5:27 now.. haven't slept yet.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] OrrPenn18:
@Farmfield

Any rock-stable build after the epic 18/10 build? :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
Epic 10/29 10/30 and 10/31+ v4 siyah.. ;)

Sent from my changminized beast
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GFXi0N:
Update of my status: In case anyone cares :)

Hard brick: Trying to use the warranty to make samsung change the mobo or whatever they have to do..... if they find out i have been changing the rom, i guess my warranty will be void... but as the screen does not show anything at all, i guess it will be quite difficult for them to find out...

If everything fails, I can always pay for the repair... which sure would be cheaper than buying a new phone.....

I hope I can come back to this...... in the mean time... back to my samsung galaxy spica... :( :(

Today is a sad day...

Farewell, people... and take care of your phones, you don't know when they can suddenly die on you....
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Spiralzz:
Feel sorry for you mate :(

Can anyone please mirror the 1112 Siyah v4? I can't seem to download from source forge, it take a hell lot of time for some reason, then in the end its unsuccessful...

Edit: Nevermind, just remember Farmfield keeps these kernels as well... am downloading, but its really slow, wonder why...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Sorry to hear about your bricked device but it seems the service centers have a jag or mb replace policy these days from what I have seen on the 4.0.4 leaked thread. Hope they fix it no questions asked

Don't you have any sign of life
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
The last one, 19/11 + Siyah 4 is absolutely awesome. The other day I had 14h use, 1-1/5h screentime, 1+ h listening to music and >60% battery still.

Really sad to hear this and I too is hoping you get a replacement. First real brick I heard about since I started messing around with CM10. :(
[Galaxy S II Android Development] gilc8:
Weird problem. Suddenly I can't see the calendar on the lock screen. Already tried to disable and enable, to pick some other calendars to show...

I'm with 12/11 build.

Anyone?

10x
[Galaxy S II Android Development] AayushDhuria:
Was boot logo I9100 coming? Or charging animation when switched off?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] itchetrigr:
If your getting to the blue loading bar you aren't bricked and still have recovery, try the 3 button combo to recovery but release all buttons once the Samsung boot screen shows up, this should kick you into recovery. Releasing the power button alone won't work in your case, you'll need to release all buttons
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
OT but amusing:

A friend of mine showed me his S3 with 4.1.1.... I went through some apps, settings and so forth and oh man is it SLOW, UNRESPONSIVE AND STUTTERY like hell. The funny thing is I tried his S3 with 4.0.4 a few weeks ago and it was much smoother then...

But 4.1.1...

Opening app drawer was so laggy/slow (touchwiz ux), opening app animations were horrendous..

He has not too many apps on his phone but I wonder why a quad core 1,4 ghz is still not enough for android to get smoother than wp8 and ios. Oh and btw I hate ios and wp8. But Android has a long way to go. Sorry. And the december bug in 4.2.... Wtf google?? Oh and bring a working project butter back on 4.2.1..

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
And the Gnex with stock 4.1 wasn't much better. You know me, I have never seen butter implemented in a way that impressed me. Everytime I feel real butter the phone gets unresponsive instead, in the Gnex, the leaked ROM for the S2 a.s.o... I always thought CM10 was better, even though it had som stuttering/microjitters, whatever people will call it - at least it was never unresponsive...

And I disagree with the other OS's. iOS is really nice. When jailbroken. :D ...so it's nothing wrong with the OS, it's Apple's implementation of the rules regarding the OS (and the app's) that suck. WP7/8 is also quite nice. As locked in as iOS but with custom bootloader & all that, it's actually not bad at all. Extremely responsive, very, very smooth. Very simple to learn, to use. I wouldn't switch from Android to it, but I still think it's a pretty nice OS. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] OrrPenn18:
Back to the MCM table from the bugged Samsung leak

I gotta say, missed my butter!

I prefer the serenity of butterbuilds as opposed to the dazzle of Samsung's unholy stuff(all those extras)

Back home, I feel holy! :D

Thanks Changmin!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
I had the same issue with mine before 4 months(4.0.4).

The device was dead,i was afraid that the service charged me but all went ok,in one hour had the device serviced ,free of charge(just showed the warranty) with 4.0.3 and the evening has rooted with the other method than odin and from then runs only cyanogenmod.

Don't worry,they cannot proove that your device was rooted...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Are the Linaro builds better now? First one was not so good..

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Stock or Siyah? I had some stuttering with stock but the Siyah 23/9 vsync one is amazingly smooth, no lags or stuttering at all. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
On mine it seems that way and I did say smoother not faster. I installed 25c tried but didn't seem smooth then siyah found fast but not smooth, then reinstalled cm10 vsync and it became smoother. Go figure :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] snalfio:
i'm using siyah!!!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] KQ9:
My thought exactly. Was trying out the new AOKP build 3, accidently forgot to make a backup so had to start over and after reading your comment, gave the official nightlies a spin and wow. It's definitely faster. I can hardly tell the difference if there is any. Running Siyah 4.1.5 straight from gokhanmoral. I guess its back to official nightlies for me now unless they mess up. I prefer those than anything else unless I have to.

Thanks mcm811, your contribution has been awesome.

Edit: AOKP Build 3 was quite laggy btw. Tried it for about 4 hours. CM10 was fast from the first minute compared to it, this is just my device reaction.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Then your device sucks. Throw it in the wall and buy an Iphone 5. :D

Or you could try my overkill-flashing-routine, accept the flashing. Boot into recovery, wipe cache, wipe dalvik, fix permissions, reboot.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] snalfio:
i'm an addicted to the 2nd option :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Dalvik ffs, wipe dalvik... :eek:

That was a damn you auto-correct moment if any. I seriously did not write that, SwiftKey 'corrected' me. That is really bad, so sorry...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ¶ha€dru$:
yeah I've tried the last two and had no problems and much less ram usage/battery performance

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] aliander:
Hm... any kernel changes in new build(s)?

Or is Siyah 09/23 still up to date?

Thx :)

If someone (maybe OP? ;) ) could give me a hint where to see the commits to the used sources, that would be great - Thx :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
For me Siyah 23/9 works much better then latest stock kernel...

And no hints, we're all pretty much in the dark here, hehe... :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
For me they are, hard to see in the UI or apps, but I really got better results in benchmarks.

I know it's useless to do a better score in becnhmarks if you don't see any differences when you normally use it, but you know... I'm a geek :p.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] minidou-77:
If you want to test the latest Dormianx natively support vsync ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Gustavo_s:
i tried it, no deal, it still got screen tearing when you drag your finger through the menus, lists and everything else, so no vsync, but performance is amazing.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lyndonguti:
Do you mean on launchers? If you use apex transitions in home screen /drawer is a little bit laggy...no kernel related anyway :)

If not so maybe your right hehe:)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Gustavo_s:
i use trebuchet, and on launcher its ok, the screen tearing occurs on on lists when you scroll up or down dragging your finger through the screen.

not that its too bad, almost nobody notices that only paranoid people :p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lyndonguti:
Lol im in paranoid xD
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Gustavo_s:
OMG XD you didnt understand it, i mean 'paranoid people', 'crazy people', not paranoidandroid rom users lmfao

your flashaholic level is over 9000 xD
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lyndonguti:
Lol i got it its just a little bit of joke yow! Hahah...you dont get it xD
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mundixx:
This build would be even more ****ing amazing when Espen's new memleak fix would be merged! :thumbup:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] 22sl22:
Hope everything goes well for you. Almost happened to my S2 just now, going through my usual daily rom flash when my S2 wouldn't let me install any rom/ zip file in recovery so I tried odin which failed twice with stock firmware, but third time I was lucky and it worked :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GFXi0N:
Thanks for all your replies... you are good guys, people...

I was unable to get to recovery in any way.... just blue loading bar reaching 100% and nothing...

Then, i entered download mode and i ended f****** it up re-partitioning.....

If everything goes well, I will be back in some weeks.... if not,.... that's it for me with smartphones for a long while.....

Thanks, thanks thanks.... :good:

mcm: Your rom has been the best I had in my device.... no match at all with the other roms.... keep the good job ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Hope they fix it for you
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Beefheart:
Gave it a quick try after hearing a few things about it but couldn't see (or feel) any difference between this and any of the other CM or AOKP/AOSP builds out there personally. It certainly isn't as smooth as the leaked JB stock build, although it has less bugs to be fair. It has the dialer delay I have come to hate too, pressing number keys on the dial pad take a milisecond to respond instead of being instantaneous.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
you know what they say when you fall of a horse: ride again as soon as possible ;).
[Galaxy S II Android Development] artie1:
:crying:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ¶ha€dru$:
yeah finally seeing those kinds of results. v5 wasn't noticeably better or worse... except for battery performance. v4 is the clear choice

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
I got 13h since charge, 1h screentime, 1h listening to music and 71% charge still. Really nice. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] webber2109:
Mind sharing your build and kernel version? I'm struggling with battery life.. still using 18/10 build.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] galaxyluv:
Hey guys... if I wanna come back to mcm build from the jb leak...would I have to wipe everything + format OR can I just wipe cache/dalvik cache and flash?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Unexist6969:
If you want to avoid bricks you should wipe /system and data/factory reset but on a safe kernel like siyah
[Galaxy S II Android Development] galaxyluv:
Oh OK ...thanks... I hope Philz kernel doesn't brick anything :S...cuz that's the one with the leak version
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Agent_Adodas:
Philz kernel is safe, it doesn't have the brick bug.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Thijssie909:
That's great, are you using Siyah 4 or 5?

Switched back from the leak to mcm's build and can't find the leak that much smoother. Love this one, better than stock CM10.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
Almost 1hr screentime with 13% battery used.. ;) 1031 build + 1112 siyah v4..

Sent from my changminized beast
[Galaxy S II Android Development] OrrPenn18:
I'm impressed! 12/11 build
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Lol flashing Android 4.2 on my HTC Desire Z :P. Hopefully mcm has something for us... :)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dalya:
stock battery??:eek:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Guess 2000 battery... i get usually 45 minutes screen on and 10% battery lost.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] huwande1acruz:
Sorry for the OT but did anyone encounter this? Im on the 11/19 build + siyahv4.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
Im using stock battery.. This is the battery since I bought this phone.. ;) no stirs.. Hehe.. :thumbup:

Sent from my changminized beast
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
I'm still on leak but I get that screen on to with 1650mah battery so 2000mah should get that easy
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
I'm on 19/11 and Siyah 4... :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] anson162002:
after flashing siyah kernel, i can't boot the phone:(
[Galaxy S II Android Development] manulemaboul:
wich one have you flashed ? on wich ROM ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] anson162002:
19/11 build
[Galaxy S II Android Development] thomsch:
Weird. Im in neatrom lite 4.0 and im getting instalation aborted when i try the last build

I downloaded 3 times already

Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Have to ask but you did use modified siyah from this thread didn't you
[Galaxy S II Android Development] anson162002:
I don't know what you mean
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Did you download siyah kernel from here

http://sourceforge.net/projects/cm10i9100vsync/files/vsync_sysfs/
[Galaxy S II Android Development] anson162002:
Yes I am
[Galaxy S II Android Development] OrrPenn18:
I guess you're on PhilZ's kernel.

Flash some different kernel, doesn't matter which. Reboot Recovery. Then flash MCM's build.

It'll work!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] hoseth0711:
Is the development dead in this thread?

Sendt fra min GT-I9100 med Tapatalk2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Neil15:
Nope. Mcm just released new build 1119..

I hope we can get 4.2 version, like the G version is having right now.. Envious.. lol

Edit: Codeworx just released 4.2 few hours ago.. And my friend is currently on that version. Doesn't heard any feedback yet but He's enjoying it..

Sent from my changminized beast
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
So will next cm10 build automatically be 4.2 then, or..?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
He released it for the 9100G. I guess ours will take MUCH longer...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2

---------- Post added at 06:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:04 PM ----------

Yes for the 9100G. It's different Hardware than 9100. Easier for devs.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] thomsch:
Via odin? I fant via rrcovery

Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] anson162002:
Did I miss some steps?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] thomsch:
Finally I'm back with this rom. Really missed aosp.

Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Just manually get into recovery, 3 hard keys power,home, volume up, press and hold till recovery pops up then flash just ROM first see if that's OK. And don't try to dual boot
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dalya:
where can i download 1031 build? any link?:o
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
The 19/11 build + Siyah 4 is as good as 29- & 31/10 builds was, in terms of battery life - so no reason running that old thing. ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] greenemperor:
+1

19/11 build is by far the most stable mcm's build.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
Been around cm10 long enough to already guess that :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] carlocarrera:
Same old story with cm10...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
My guess in about 3 weeks we will get a preview with a few bugs just like the beggining of cm10 for i9100 unless they think 4.1.2 is good enough for us
[Galaxy S II Android Development] nat510:
android 4.2 is not as good as 4.1.2 in my nexus7, (laggy and less butter)

Think that it will be same in s2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ¶ha€dru$:
one difference I noticed is that I can't reboot without freezing up on v4..meaning I can't ever change the I/O scheduler to sio

didn't have that problem on v5

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bombaybadboy:
From what I have read its very power hungry too

Just saw an interview

Xplodwild:*Android 4.2 software merging was just done yesterday, so there are still a few things to be done but it’s already working nice. Also, from a porting point of view, since Google bumped HWComposer (hardware graphics acceleration) version and removed legacy support, most devices will be down for quite some time until it works, especially Samsung devices (since we still don’t have proper sources). Galaxy Nexus and Nexus 4 will arrive very soon, however it will take WAY more time for Galaxy S/Note series, for the reason above (among other reasons, like Audio on S II/Note). Wait and see.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Farmfield:
Change to SIO in STweaks - it's been a while since it was possible setting that in performance settings, some kind of bug...

And I have had no issues what so ever with the 19/11 build + Siyah 4, not even that Play Store reboot thing that happened sometimes in the 12- & 15/11 builds...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ¶ha€dru$:
I thought u had to use Extweaks for v4

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Gustavo_s:
both of them read uci.sh interface, its just an UI for kernel settings.