yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
In this scenario you dont have last_kmsg. Probably problem related to "kernel" or an "app" like pgm or a bug into "rom" ...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Charmacas:
AW: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

For those interested: CarbonRom 1.5 Beta is out there. ;)

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus with Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MBQ_:
Just updated my ROM for Maguro. :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mrchambo:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Toro next?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MBQ_:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Yes. Building toro right now as we speak. In fact, I'm taking myself out to lunch while I wait for it to build. Hahaha
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] slayr76:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Ak 710 cylon kernel causes screen freeze for me on reboot with PA 3.1 rom 50% of the time requiring battery pull.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mrchambo:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Feed yourself well, MBQsniper!

MrC
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MBQ_:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Steak fajitas. :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mrchambo:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Well played, sir!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] thegtfusion:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Can you compile a full aosp 4.2.2 build with the expanded desktop option added? (And root and etc :D)

Would be awesome :D

Sent from my Nexus Prime
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MBQ_:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Pics in a few ;)

Sure thing. :good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MBQ_:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

:)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mrchambo:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Get another plate!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] AznInertia:
AK, I sent you a pm of my last_kmsg. Hopefully you can figure out what's causing all my screen freezes.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MBQ_:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Post it here too please
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Tex99:
R: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

In trickster mod, at " try to ..... Less core" is sets 1 for battery ? If i don t want that 1 core could go offline and i prefer have more performance , i have to select 2 ?? Thanks

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] thegtfusion:
great! :D

can you PM me when you have it? or post in project chicago :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ppog:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Wow guys I was on a plane for 3 hours and I log in to my xda app to find pages and pages of great stuff from team AK. This thread rocks
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
0 doesn't make an effort to force everything to one core, 1 moderately does and 2 aggressively does so 2 would be better for battery because it's trying to do as much as possible on only one core instead of both.

Unless I am reading it wrong.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Asmodicus:
That's the way I understood it as well. I've had it set on "2" the whole time. I can't tell any real difference though, since all AK's kernels have such great battery life anyways.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
1 is for best power saving and 2 for most agresive and 0 is to disable that option.if you want better battery life set it to 1
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Asmodicus:
If 2 is more aggressive, then wouldn't it be the setting that would get you the best battery saving? Unless I'm reading your post incorrectly.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
But it says that the most 1 only moderately tries to focus processes to a single core where as 2 aggressively forces most processes to run on one core. Wouldn't 2 be more battery friendly since it's pushing harder to use only 1 core instead of 2. That is how I would figure it. Kind of just like how hotplugging only uses 1 core unless it needs 2 cores which uses less battery.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] AznInertia:
https://www.box.com/s/7pgfqfe5owjubk0ho3qm

Here is my last_kmsg. Do I post it like this or do I copy and paste the text and post it in here?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
it says:'' try to group tasks into least cores posible. 0 to disable to 2 for most aggressive so 1 is for power saving because it groups most tasks into 1 core so only 1 core will run and the second one will be turned on only when necessary
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Asmodicus:
Right. So, if you set it on "2", then it would be more aggressive in grouping tasks to only one core, theu saving more battery. Whereas with it set on "1", it would not save more on battery.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
Exactly, 1 moderately groups to the least cores meaning one core, 2 aggressively groups to least cores meaning it is being more forceful on everything going to one core. That should mean that 2 would be more efficient on battery since it pushes harder to group everything to a single core.

Then you have 0 that disables the single core grouping completely.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] gummie:
I think this is how that Feature works. It says to the title that this enables the feature to do stuffs to least possible number of core and the options 0 is to disable, 1 is moderate and 2 for aggressive. Option number 1 saves more battery because it moderately commands to use the least number of core while Option number 2 aggressively commands the usage of least number of core.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Asmodicus:
That's the way that I'm understanding it as well.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
That does not make sense, if 2 is more aggressively forcing groups to one core then it is making a larger effort to only use one core than option 1, which would mean that 2 would be the best for battery, 1 would be somewhere in the middle of performance and battery and 0 disables.

In the instance of this option more aggressive is better for battery because it is being forceful on keeping the second core from being used.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
ok
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Asmodicus:
Exactly.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
kisses?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Asmodicus:
You have to buy me dinner first!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
no problem.then i will buy you a ring too :good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
Hey Ruse, whatcha think of my new signature?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Now i saw it.it is much better than the old one and much closer to perfection.fantastic job!really cool :thumbup:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Asmodicus:
I like it a lot Neph! Great work as always!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
ahahaha....well put :fingers-crossed:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
Thanks guys, I figured I've been doing a lot of custom work so I'd treat myself. :good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Btw...now that full 4.2.2 sources are pushed I can't wait for a full 4.2.2 based aospa rom.and with this i will end my day :) .night guys and ejnoy android
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
No doubt, that will be epic. I can only imagine how crazy full 4.2.2 source AOSPA and a crisp new 3.8 AK Kernel will be when it happens!!!! :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
do it often...I am sure it will be better and better :good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] gummie:
Lets put it this way. If you are surfing via Browser/Chrome and you have enabled the option to Moderately use 1 core VS. Aggressively/Force a 1 core processing

- a job accomplished by 2 Cores is faster that forcing to process everything on a Single Core therefore the time consumed by the Process by 2 Cores is significantly more efficient (energy wise) than the one that is done by Single Core.

- therefore setting a command to moderately use this function come on use when doing/managing lesser/single processes like Sending SMS that needs minimal computing output.

- and Aggresively setting it on use means majority of process you do specially multi tasking are forced to use 1 core or lets not say force, maybe "most of the time"

If my theory of the 2 Core VS 1 Core is correct, Forcing most work on a single core consumes more juice than settings it moderately.

Time and Energy consumed by 2 workers than a 1 worker is far more efficient.

PS: I know I may sound redundant but I hope that I made a point somehow.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 02ranger:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

I remember seeing a post a while back where somebody asked everybody what they had set for that option and I thought it was in this thread, but I can't find it. My point is, I had the option set to 2 and the performance of my phone was very sluggish. Animations were jittery, actions slow, and all this happened after a reboot as well. Changed it back to 1, and everything is buttery again. That's all I've changed, so apparently at least my phone doesn't play well with that setting.

Just my 2 cents. :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Asmodicus:
I don't agree. Running two cores to do something one core can do by itself should, in theory, use more power. Grouping tasks to one core would be better as far as saving battery goes. I might be wrong, but that's how I've understood it from what I've read in the forums and on G+.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
I get what you mean with your explanation but if that is the case wouldn't hotplug governors by your theory have a negative effect on our batteries? When in turn they actually give some of the best battery life you can find from a kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Az Biker:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Am I missing something? My "try to... less core" only has off/on...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
What kernel are you using?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Az Biker:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Cylon 710 w/ atom v8
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] -Jesco-:
Just curious , anyone tried pitchblack with AK kernel ?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mrchambo:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Update trickster mod.

MrC
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
As mrchambo suggested, update trickstermod, it had an update today. ;)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Az Biker:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Arrrggggh! Thx guys!

Edit: what good is auto-update if you have to manually update?

Yes there is my 0,1,2 option... Thx again!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] gummie:
I agree to that but there are also factors that needs to be considered. That's why I said that when setting it to moderately, it groups processes that only needs or can be accomplished by 1 core with minimal energy but setting it to do most of processes on a single core that's different matter. If doing multitask or just simply browsing and you force it to single core doesn't that slows computing therefore long processing time consumes far more energy than the process made by two cores that only lasts on short time frame.

Its the energy cost over time by Single VS Dual core.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
Mine auto-updated, odd.

I personally have it set on 2 but you can experiment and try see what works best for you. :)

---------- Post added at 07:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:47 PM ----------

But one core will always consume less battery than two cores, even if the it is more resource heavy processes.

As I asked before, wouldn't hotplug governors be bad for your devices battery life if your theory was true?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] leftis69:
Pitchblack v1.3 with Cylon v710 = perfection:)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
You are the best renaud ...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] renaud:
Of course
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] renaud:
Those who are having deep sleep problems, are you using trickster mod?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] justme1988:
Mine is not sleeping using fugumod and using trickster indeed.

you thing removing trickster would help?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
yes, I did a test and in fact with Fugu on my phone no deep sleep.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
I uninstalled app and from recovery i made ​​clear cache and Dalvik, but my phone doesn't go into deep sleep ....
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Savant:
Share the goodness and I'm using trickster mod and still having deep sleep issues. I don't know what's going on yet.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] renaud:
My advise would be doing a clean install without trickster and if the problem persist, check what happens with better battery stats
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
ok renaud, i will try to do this ...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] odin13:
Yes i am but deep sleep works fine on stock kernel when using trickster mod.

Do you think trickster is causing the problem?

Verstuurd van mijn Galaxy Nexus met Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
I have fresh rom but it doesn't work.

Batterystat report:

khubd process
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] parkson:
Which or whose version of 4.2 is deep sleep being tested? I couldn't get any deep sleep at all on the team syence 4.2 rom.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
All stock And none ..... :eek:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Riekr:
Yes, battery completely out of charge during night.

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] odin13:
Anarkia, 4.2 kernel sources are available :D

Verstuurd van mijn Galaxy Nexus met Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] renaud:
And they solve the issue for the users having it.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] sk8oldschool74:
Will this work on 4.1.2? I still only see 310
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
Grazie mucho thanks!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
I have merged source in this moment .... i want to see evolution of berserk .... :D:D:D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] odin13:
:good: :D

Verstuurd van mijn Galaxy Nexus met Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] gummie:
I think Hotplug is more farfetched if we compare it to this feature. Hotplugging in Theory (a fact maybe) saves energy due to that it shuts off a core if its not needed and turns it back on if it reaches certain limit set by the Governor, specially on screen off. Its the Interactive feature for Multi Cored Processor. In this new feature we have, we still actually run 2 cores but only groups certain processes on a single core to compute them.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

I'm going to run one day on option 2 and then one on option 1 as an experiment. Then we can compare. :)

Sent from my AK Cylon Powered AOSPA 3.1 Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

I use option 0 and f|_|ck that option.trickster dev should explain that better but as morfic said: " 0 means disable, everything else means on"...lol:thumbup:

Sent from CR88's awesom GNex powered by AK Kernel
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Lmao!

Hey, I thought you were going to bed?

Sent from my AK Cylon Powered AOSPA 3.1 Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

I know.I am crazy...can't go to bed without taking a peek on xda :)).

Sent from CR88's awesom GNex powered by AK Kernel
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] musashihatred:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Guys need a little help

I backed up using twrp 2.4.3.0

Restored today, data not restoring. :/

Any tips?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

It will not hurt to ask this q also on twrp thread.hope you finde an answere :thumbup: night guys :D:beer:

Sent from CR88's awesom GNex powered by AK Kernel
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SahilC:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Finally the source is out!

Yes I'm late I was sleeping :P

I was scared that you guys would go through 3 or 4 more name changes before I could jump to 4.2.2 :p

Sent from my Nexus Prime powered by AK goodness!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] gummie:
For some posts back, were talking like actual hard boiled Dev Team. LOL.

On option 1 for now, trying out 2 tomorrow.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Just the opposite for me, on 2, doing 1 after that. :)

Sent from my AK Cylon Powered AOSPA 3.1 Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] DoesntPostAThing:
Just discovered ssLauncher the Original... amazing! Has a learning curve, but the amount of theming you can do on it is amazing! Scroll down like Google Now cards, and at the same time have pages.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] eng.stk:
A little gift for you guys:

I put together a flash zip with all drivers from JB 4.2.2 - JDQ39, so we can use new ak kernels and feel some JB 4.2.2 sweetness on Purity ROM while Dario works his magic (or other JB 4.2.1 ROMs you use).

1. Flash zip on favorite recovery (use my TWRP 2.4.3.0 Flash Zip)

2. Flash anarkia 4.2.2 kernels[/URL] (I use Purity v023)

3. Fix permissions and wipe cache & dalvik

4. Reboot and profit :highfive:

md5 hash: A50B3965167EA9FB6ED5BA5B72757CD9
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] dr_w:
Does this work on TORO too?

Side note, I'm running unofficial xylon toro with AK 704 (works the best with my phone) and everytime I reboot it stops after the pirate animation. Any recommendations?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] musashihatred:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Is your tarp same as the one in the twrp thread?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] adio201:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Pgm2 dose not work with kernel anyway to get it working
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] adio201:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Asmodicus:
Forgive me, but I'm a little confused. If I am running Atom v.8 (which is 4.2.2) and AK's 003.422Xfiles kernel, is this something I should need or want to flash? Or does my device already have these drivers on it? I should mention, I'm on toro+ as well.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Shadow-Nexus:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

I dont think you need those

That's for 4.2.1 ROMs to become compatible with 4.2.2 kernels until the Dev of your ROM updates it to 4.2.2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Asmodicus:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Ahhh.. Gotcha. Just wanted to check k and make sure. Thanks for replying!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mrchambo:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

You don't need these drivers. They are for making it possible to run a 4.2.2 kernel in a 4.2.1 ROM.

MrC
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Az Biker:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Just think... If I had these drivers two weeks ago, I'd still be on RBJ w/Trinity and NEVER would have found AK... Sometimes, late IS better :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] killersloth:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

AK: Converting Franco Trinity users daily.

:)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Asmodicus:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

TGIF!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Khizar:
yeah his is the same.. the only difference is that his is in zip format

:good:

fixed :p
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] killersloth:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

For real, I am now spoiled by anarkia.

This kernel is smoother and better for battery life then any other. Not just a preference, ak kernel is a necessity for me now :)

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus to all you wonder nobodies!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Wh1t3Rose:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Hey guys I'm back and I Bought XDA Premium to support awesome community :D (See Sig). Anyways I had something happen to my phone after I got it fixed and went back to stock that kind of surprised me. I went to settings and my phone number shows up and The Network type shows as Verizon. It didnt do this before. (Remember I have a broken Sim card!) It said unknown for both. Now it still says No Sim card. But why does my # and Network type suddenly display correctly but shows No Sim card?

Also how come when I went to stock Image my SD was wiped? Luckily I took backups like 3-4 days ago.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Khizar:
+1.. i dont even try other kernels anymore.. i flash rom>gapps>AK by default now :good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] dr_w:
I'm having reboot issues, when I reboot, I get the pirate animation then it just goes black. I'm on xylon and ak 704. Any recommendations?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Khizar:
when you flash the factory image.. the userdata img wipes the internal sdcard so next time you want to flash the factory image and keep your sdcard just take out the userdata img from it and then flash it :good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Wh1t3Rose:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Didn't know this! :eek: thanks!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Same here bro!!!! :)

Sent from my AK Cylon Powered AOSPA 3.1 Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SahilC:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Hey guys I've been trying 'multi core power saving' to value 2.

It seems just as smooth, if not smoother. Theoretically it should improve battery life, right?

I'll let you know at the end of the day.

Anyways, I'm still on Dummy 677 UNDERCLOCKED for heaven's sake and I'm flyingggg

I can't even imagine how insane Cylon will be :good:

Sent from my Nexus Prime powered by AK goodness!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] -Jesco-:
whats the diff between 2 and 1 ?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MBQ_:
Two is a larger number than one. :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Khizar:
:highfive:

lol just wait till you flash cylon ;)

2 comes after 1 :p
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] -Jesco-:
i always thought it was .. 0,2,1,3,5,4,8,7,6,10,9 .. guess i messed my numbers up :|
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] neob.abragil:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

been busy for last 3-4 days like hell...Couldn't follow the thread properly; it's good that anarkia too took a rest...I mean no new Kernel released in between ;)

I guess here "1" is in between "0" & "2", in terms of power saving aggressiveness.

Otherwise in general the 'diff between 2 and 1' is 1... (2-1)=1 or (1-2)=-1 ;)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Khizar:
no worries bro.. its human to make mistakes, but we are here to help users learn from your mistake ;)

Stefano doesnt rest.. he released a kernel yesterday on g+.. from my time in this thread i have seen that he releases a kernel every 1-2 days and i dont know how but every new kernel is better for me :p

Edit- btw i might be taking a break from xda as well :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MBQ_:
Hey man... it happens. ;) hahahaha
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SahilC:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.67+][4.2.2] [CYLON v710* - PURITY v023] [27/02] AK

Looool. You sir, just made my day.

1 is like medium aggressiveness, I guess. But 2 isn't lagging, like I feared it would. But I guess I'm not too great of a tester, because I'm a veryy light user. Whatsapp and xda only xD

Sent from my Nexus Prime powered by AK goodness!