yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Yes
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] tetrakinitis:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Sorry! I didn't understand this :rolleyes:. Of course it's Greek.

Sent from my SmoothCriminal™
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Bosio91:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Not one of those record results, but I'm still very impressed and satisfied with the results from my last cycle.

Using latest Rasbeanjelly and Cylon 801 :thumbup: :D

Thank you anarkia1976 for the kernel settings and MBQsniper for the kernel settings!

I'm want to try out a new ROM, my first options are AK-47 or Purity 5.1. 1st What do you think? Any other suggestions are welcome :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pageniao:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

010 with pgm can't work fine.load module fine but can't wake up screen
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] szucsgf:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

AK47 is working great for me. As of yesterday it's my new daily driver. It's as fast as Vanir (which is the fastest ROM I've ever used) with lots more customization and a bit better battery life it seems.

Maguro | AK47 3-14 | Cylon 801
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] stevensoaj:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

I have to recommend SlimBean. Their latest release added a couple of really cool features, such as "the real dark slim" toggle, which basically switches back and forth between normal and inverted gapps, if you flashed slim gapps. Also, slim sizer which allows you to remove system apks to make the ROM even slimmer! The entire ROM is around 87mb and their slim gapps is about 24mb.

It runs great with AK kernels of course. And has plenty of cool mods, such as quick settings, power toggles, transparent Nav and status bars, center clock, circle battery, lock screen slider shortcuts and disable usability hints, and a lot more! You guys really should check it out.

And a modded play store that allows DPI changing without app incompatibility is pretty sweet too. 268 DPI is my favorite. :p

Did I mention dash clock comes preinstalled?

Maguro | SlimBean 4.2.2 | AK Cylon 010
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Sik-1:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Hey ak I'm not getting deep sleep anymore, since v734 haven't been getting deep sleep, switched kernels and all is fine, I haven't complained bcuz as I stated b4 the min freq 350 isn't draining the battery at all, I only notice that it doesn't sleep
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] -Jesco-:
give v801 a try !
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] qu4nd:
AW: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

I'll give the test version a try! Can't wait to see how it's doing!!! :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Sik-1:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

I didn't flash the wifi zip and all is fine on my end:thumbup::D, just no deep sleep as stated earlier

---------- Post added at 11:09 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:06 AM ----------

I was previously on v801 and no sleep either, tried out fancy, Franco and lean and its sleeping fine, then came to the test and no sleep again :confused:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Phazmos:
get a gps lock and it should sleep. actually, all I had to do in most cases is just open an app that uses gps, seemed like it didn't need a lock, just starting gps took care of this every time, and across multiple roms

---------- Post added at 11:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:12 AM ----------

anyone lose gpu overclock setting in trickster on 801? I have been seeing this on 801
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] -Jesco-:
if i aint wrong it was hard coded to be at 384mhz cant be OC
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mrchambo:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

I recommend Purity 5.1.

MrC
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Khizar:
out of those 2 i would recommend AK-47, IMO its almost as smooth as purity but has more customization options avaliable

you lost it cuz stefano hardcoded it, GPU cant be OCd
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Sik-1:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Have tried that also, and I'm not seeing any abnormal wake locks either, I haven't installed or changed any apps, the kernel just won't sleep for me, honestly I don't really lose any battery life, so I'm just reporting it like I should :D:p no biggie for me

This is why :D:p
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Sik-1:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] dreitzell78:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

You should really try Sourcery. Fast, stable and almost every feature you could ever imagine. I tried AK last night. It's good, but really no comparison to Sourcery. Give it a shot.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] tetrakinitis:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

+1 AK-47 it's a great rom. Try it!

Sent from my SmoothCriminal™
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Az Biker:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

I deleted the rest of your post because as you complain about taking up no - kernel related space, you're taking up more than everybody else with your moaning...

I skip your posts and you're wiped. You act like a 14 yr old girl who has no friends because she does nothing but whine and complain. I've learned more in the 10% of relevant posts (as you put it) in this thread than any other thread in over a year. If you don't like the flow here, move along, create your own utopian, purist thread.

Ciao

Atom v9 + Cylon 801 = Gyrannosaurus Nex
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] bunnahabhain:
I am testing out purity 5.1 with the new Cylon 010. Seriously - it's like riding a f|_|cking rollercoaster!

Will try this with new linaro build of teamEOS once it comes out. I experienced no issues - very clean and stable kernel! Glad u started over anarkia!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] butikofer08:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

If you want lots of customization options try ak47 or JBSourcery. Sorcery hands down offers the most options....too much in my opinion.

Purity isn't for you if you want heavy customization but damn is it smooth. I switch back and forth from ak47 to purity now. And I came from sorcery.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] shag_on_e:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

At a quick glance, the test kernel is extremely lean and mean! I haven't pushed the system gaming yet, but without overclock this this is definitely fast as hell! I'm not usually one to post without thorough testing, and I do miss the features, but I must say great work work on the rebasing man!

~~~~There is no spoon~~~~
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] FoleyRose:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

I think the best is to just let it go now, just forget about it and keep on doing what we did before. We know what we like about this thread and this community, we stick up for each other and kindly invite those who don't to leave us alone.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Az Biker:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Of course you're right. It's just hard to remain silent when someone comes in to a friend's 'house' and starts disrespecting them and their family because things are not to their liking...

Atom v9 + Cylon 801 = Gyrannosaurus Nex
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] killersloth:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Just made the switch from Ubuntu to mint.... It's like night and day.

I've had no problems with cylon 801, need a test kernel to mix things up :p
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Charmacas:
AW: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Anarkia I asked this before but I think you did not see it. Did you tune sakuractive also? It's an interesting governor but it would be even more interesting if you tuned it. ;)

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus with Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] shanp7780:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Anyone try zen i/o scheduler?

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
I dont have tuned Sakuractive .... but if you have suggestions are available. :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
R: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Seems better than the others (however, i involuntarily hit thanks)

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] B@je:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

I'll also like a tuned sugar active as I use that governor and I get minimum lag and it's usually when I unlock the phone but in know you can eliminate that if it's to your liking
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] galakanokis:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Just flashed the new test kernel and so far so good. Anarkia1976, is there anything specific to look for in testing?

I'm off to play hockey so will report back later this afternoon.

G
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kubson1999:
Odp: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Lol

On 801 anarkia kernel with oc to 1600 MHz had an average of 37 fps in real racing 3. Now, on 010, the processor set to max 1200 MHz have a little over 40 fps. A little strange, but with anarkia kernel the impossible becomes possible :D

☆★☆Nexus ☆★☆
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] szucsgf:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

May I ask, how is sorcery's speed compared to Vanir based ROMs? I've been tempted to give sorcery a try lately just to see all the customization options.

Maguro | AK47 3-14 | Cylon 801
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
R: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Maybe because of thermal throttle ;) anyway most games are good enough at normal clock speed

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] butikofer08:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

I find vanir based ROMs and purity the smoothest and most responsive. That's not to say sourcery is slow or lags. I was also on sourcery before I discovered AK kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] cmoG530:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

So far, with 010, I can confirm that PGM is broken. Loads fine, but is broken and it's pretty laggy on PA ROM. That's all I can give for now. Haven't had a full discharge yet. Oh and default settings.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
R: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

May i ask how is going the development of linux 3.4 based kernel? I'd like to help (testing of course, since it's the only thing i can do)

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
Stefano already anwered this q today... It will work only when google team will do it so no 3.4 kernel untill then :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 1haumann1:
AW: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=39242904

swyped from my maguro
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
R: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Sorry,i didn't read that, this thread is overpopulated :D let's hope google will do it, i've got some doubt about their wish to make a 3.4 kernel or at least help doing it...but who i am to talk? ;)

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Charmacas:
AW: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

I am sorry, I have no suggestions.

But maybe the others have. Especially MBQsniper is using this governor a lot. :)

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus with Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JPBeard21:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

So this latest cylon test kernel using old WiFi drivers, does that mean its compatible with WEP?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] thegtfusion:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Yes it is ;)

Sent from my Nexus Prime
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] liquid150:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Tried this. No dice. Still reverting to 700k after a bit. :(
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] dreitzell78:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

I found sourcery much smoother than ak47 last night. I am using the latest experimental 5.1.1 from irc. With cyclon 801, I might add. Super sweet!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] cimdrap:
i think that they are all the same thing....the rom with more options/customizations is naturally a little less responsive. Purity is the fastest afaik, but it is so uncomfortable for me.....PA is a little less fast,but very customizable and in the middle there are tons of roms all identical
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SPyxOff:
Disagree. Atom has TONS of different features and it's the fastest Galaxy Nexus ROM to date.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] akellar:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

There is no right answer, that's why there are so many options. Pick one, enjoy it, but understand everyone has their preference. Doesn't make their rom better or worse. These arguments are pointless.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] tFrost:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

A kernel thread shouldn't be discussing the best rom, am I right?

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Asmodicus:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

No, it's perfectly alright. We like to talk about what the best ROMs are to go with AK's kernels. And thank god for that, because otherwise I might have never found Atom ROM otherwise.

Transmitted to you live and in living color with my Galaxy Nexus.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] sk8oldschool74:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

I'm going w/ purity ROM and AK 100%

---------- Post added at 12:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:49 PM ----------

Incorrect!!! ;):):beer:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Asmodicus:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Warning: Off Topic post

Hey guys, if you don't care, can you head over to Android Dissected smartphone site and vote for me (Justin Hillis) in this week's Screenshot Sunday contest? I'd really appreciate it!

http://www.androiddissected.com/screenshot-sunday-episode-26/

Transmitted to you live and in living color with my Galaxy Nexus.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] tFrost:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

I think you misunderstood, it's okay to state which rom your using with this fantastic kernel, but you don't have to state your rom is the best, because it's a matter of opinion :) Btw happy st. Paddy's

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JPBeard21:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

After trying the cylon 10 test and finding out how slimmed down it was, reconfigured my router for WPA and went back to 801. Hopefully this can be fixed for compatibility reasons while away from home.

Sent from the future using AK Cylon 801!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] tuk1maar:
HELP!!! Big battery drain NOT AK KERNEL!!!

***THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH AK KERNEL! HIS KERNELS ARE FANTASTIC!!! :p

Hey! Can anyone check my post?

I got a big battery drain. It's around 3.5%/hour, doing nothing! In 8 hours, I lost around 25% with doing nothing on flightmode.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2194935

Thanks!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
Hey guys, OT here but could you tell me how it's fair I get denied RC but I have reported this guy 5 or 6 times and kept my mouth shut instead of responding to him on the forums and nothing gets done? Today alone, after I reported 3 posts in the last 2 days, 2 of which were reported today he just comes right back and mocks me and discredits the help I contribute. I reported this first post earlier today and then within an hour I got a response from a senior mod saying the report was "closed" and that they were "taking care of it".

The first rude post made:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=39254882&postcount=5762

Then about an hour after I got the message from the senior mod about the situation being "closed and taken care of" I find that he has left this message:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=39234952&postcount=5757

Now I ask, how is it that the mods have time to go over my entire time here and deny me Recognized Contributor for things that really weren't even detailed to me but........ THIS individual can mock and badmouth me and discredit my contributions to the site over and over and the mods do nothing? This is downright unfair, I keep getting the run around, this person should be at least temporarily banned for his conduct but nothing is done. All the mods tell me is "you don't know what goes on behind the scenes", apparently nothing when I report him and 2hrs later he is back badmouthing me again when I have not said a word to him in weeks.

Sorry for the rant guys but I just don't really have anywhere else to vent and look for feedback on this situation. It really upsets me and I am on the verge of just leaving this site altogether.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] stickus:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Don't take it personally is my advice. He's obviously a troll & my general rule of thumb is "Don't feed the trolls". I know it's hard when he seems to bring it to you personally, but this is the internet, where personal interaction isn't personal. Just sit back, crack a beer or roll a doobie & enjoy the fact that your recognized enough to have your own personal troll. :D

Take it easy, take it slow, think before you post. :thumbup:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Nephilim:
My point is I haven't even responded to him in weeks but he has to ridicule and badmouth every post I make to anyone else, whether it be to ask them to follow the rules and search or if I am giving them detailed help, all he does is mock and badmouth what I say. Mods keep saying they are doing something but I've reported him countless times with no result but his return doing the same exact thing as before.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
thanks Nephil

Nephil I don't know the situation, but I know you and your work to improve and help on XDA, here you have many friends and people who respect you, do not need to discourage for a post of a person who has only 100 thanks.

I understand how you feel, and I also at this time are not very encouraged to stay.

What I see is that many high-level developers have migrated to other forum or abandoned.

Be patient because I know that the moderators are very sensitive here in our GNEX thread and will certainly find a solution to ensure that you can continue your work with confidence.

I thank you from the heart .... made a drink ... a smoke ... and forget about it.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
If you have tried all the possible combo with rom - kernel i think your problem is related to bad battery ...

Have you try to replace it?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Argasil:
Do not give up anarkia! I ever follow your work, you are a great developer, i hope that you could listen only tour fan, don't Give up man, thanks a lot, your work si the best!:good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MBQ_:
Enjoy another drink on me Anarkia. :)

Confirmation number: 02U9106446085962F

:good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

You are a true friend bro.You have my respect;)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mrgnex:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Where can I find the red with black logo wallpaper from the second post? I searched in the wallpaper thread and in this thread. Anyone has a link?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
You can try to search on this fantastic thread:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2106070
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MBQ_:
As do you. :highfive:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
you are a gentleman MBQ, thanks thanks thanks a lot.! :highfive::highfive::highfive::highfive::highfive::highfive::highfive::highfive::highfive::highfive::highfive::highfive:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ak:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

OK new ak rebased is finished without over clock.

Now its time for new named kernel line ... Also for purity :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jreyno10:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Such an exciting time :D

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] sk8oldschool74:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

How about AK Rampage or Chaos???;):):beer:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] cubsfan187:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

How about 'beast mode'? Lol. Or just plain up butter kernel?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] tuemdeluxe:
Who cares about the name? The crackflashers need their stuff :laugh:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lippol94:
R: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Why not something on the white side this time? Like "Serenity"

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nikulogical:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Lucifer kernel

Sent from my Paranoid Maguro
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] sergini:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Bolt kernel? Cuz it's faster than any other!

Gimme gimme gimme!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ciprianruse88:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

That is awesome!!!Everybody suggest something...what do you like as a name?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JPBeard21:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Hairtrigger
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] liquid150:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Pudwhacker
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mrchambo:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Clarity.

MrC

---------- Post added at 06:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:31 PM ----------

Because it's clearly the best kernel!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] zandander:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Demonized?

Idk.. Maybe lol
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] FoleyRose:
Are you on a Vanir based rom?

I don't see the problem with that, we share our discoveries instead of blindly flashing every new rom out there, that's wht a community is for.

I can't see the posts right now, so I think the mods at least deleted both of the posts you linked.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Shadow-Nexus:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Apocalypse? Armageddon?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] zandander:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Maybe even Raptor?

Mean and fast they are...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] cubsfan187:
While I'll admit that I don't know a ton about the inner workings of the kernels, I love this thread! I may not always offer advice but I try when I know the answer...lol.

How about "Die Hard" kernel?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] AutomaticFailure27:
Maybe keep in the same area with the name. Cylon (Battlestar Galatica). Maybe the new one can be, Dalek (Doctor Who). Since this kernel, exterminates! all other kernels.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] xxSAKISxx:
Απ: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

maybe the name of new kernel must be

"No Name kernel". What do you think?

Send from my awesome Galaxy Nexus using my fingers
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nikulogical:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

I think its stupid lol

Sent from my Paranoid Maguro
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jeff5347:
Re: [KERNEL] [TUNA] [3.0.69+][4.2.2] [CYLON v801* - PURITY v030] [13/03] AK

Maybe "Zeus lightning"