yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rohankb:
Shouldn't but I would just double check the settings when it starts up. Personally I think its something to do with gapps when you lose settings in the APN but not sure. I use a set of inverted gapps.

Sometimes when putting on a nightly I may have no data connection and see nothing in hr APN area. I just reboot and it comes back.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] borijess:
.7 fixed the flicker on my phone with build.prop set to 3.

Sent from the TermiNOTEr! ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dakleenupman:
Yes... BOTH build prop entries... ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] cirecomputers:
Why does the downoload only go ot 1.8mb....somethings wrong in Gothem :-/
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Ltilt2:
Which rom are you guys running that still has max etc 3? Im running slim with a total different build.prop witb no max.player etc at all anywhere.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] magnumrt562:
Failed when I try to flash... .8
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] carlospr21:
KKO-8 its only 1.3mb please fix
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Mechapanda:
It's probably still uploading right now..

Edit: opened on computer and got "unexpected end of archive"..

Sent from Outer Space
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Eric-1987:
Mine is really small too.

The kernel!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dafoxs:
Upload got fubard

http://androtransfer.com/?developer=DAGr8

---------- Post added at 08:23 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:12 AM ----------

Funny, 266 downloads already. News travels fast

---------- Post added at 09:11 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:23 AM ----------

V8 up and running. Great job here. Thanks dagr8.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] borijess:
I am getting alittle flickering with .8. Did not get any flickering with .7.

Sent from the TermiNOTEr! ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rohankb:
Same here. Got no flicker on 7. A lot of it is evident in 8...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] borijess:
Yes I went back to .7 no flicker now.

Sent from the TermiNOTEr! ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dafoxs:
Thought it was me, tons of flicker. I know all the fixes, was hoping not to use them
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Bataga:
No flicker here....ha ha
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rohankb:
yeah turning on 'disable hw overlays' stops the flickering

Yeah bro, right behind you. V7 and latest nightly is, need I say, near perfect for me...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DAGr8:
yes I believe it's either flicker or stability for me the hangs and reboot are too much of a down side and fire my usage the flicker is not bad..even on 3 anyways.. I'll start experimenting with hybrid of .7 and .8 .. I guess if it doesn't hang on 7 for you. It should be your choice
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rohankb:
I don't know. Never saw a reboot or hang. I don't know what I'm doing that's different from others. I do dabble in sys tuner with a lot of lil tweaks here and there. But nothing I'm sure most don't do here. I'm using Apex beta for JB also. Not the stock launcher from cm10. So idk...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Mechapanda:
I'm actually back on default cm kernel for the latest build

Sent from Outer Space
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] severinca:
.8 is great for me on liquid rom . No flicker
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Mechapanda:
Was getting reboots/hangs on vanilla cm, and flickering..

Sent from Outer Space
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] borijess:
Like they say no device is the same. So some will like .7 and others .8.

Sent from the TermiNOTEr! ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] tnosz:
I second that
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Ltilt2:
No flicker on liquid. Flashef 8-5
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dafoxs:
Ditto here, but it never had any flicker
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] wish777:
been on 7 slim bean no flicker..but maybe a random reboot here and there
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Eric-1987:
I got flicker on PA.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] bsw11:
Using Liquid ROM - no flicker seems stable - BUT....

The A2DP Bluetooth function is completely missing.

My last version of the Kernel showed the Artist, Title screen with blank data.

This version shows only an Icon and the word Playing now. Like A2DP data functionality is missing.

Please... see about fixing this. I don't get why BT is such a pain on CM10 but for some reason I guess it is.

Also HW+ still not working on certain MP4 files.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Mechapanda:
Lol my device didn't like either

Sent from Outer Space
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DAGr8:
I didn't change anything about by in kernel just about display
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] wish777:
weird I downloaded k.8 newest one and it has the numeral v ? is this normal?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ricco333:
No flicker on slim bean, running smooth as a Cadillac.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] AtoZ0to9:
So I've decided to start this thread because I've noticed something that I want to try and get changed for the better of this community and to help a person that I think deserves it.

What I'm trying to acomplish here is to start a petition that could potentially get him his status back. He deserves it in my opinion. And for the most part, I think you guys might too. So just place your vote in the pole and try and concentrate on all the work he produces for use and his attitude NOW. Please don't hold on to those grudges if you have any. Thanks.

I just noticed that one of are very Recognized Developers here on XDA (Task650) has recently lost his "Recognized Developer" status. So I decided to take it upon myself to find out why. Task650 explained to me that he recently flew off the handle and went on a "noob hunting spree" as he stated. He openly admitted to me that he was wrong for doing so and mentioned that he felt bad about it. Then went on to tell me that he has just forgotten about it and moved on with doing his best to better the SGS3 Forums and XDA as a whole. It was pretty cool to hear.

I know that he has been dealing with some pretty hardcore emotional issues with his 6 year old little girl having cancer. I can understand that sometimes we go through things in life that are that horrible, and we as human beings can act out in certain places that we normally would not. It's just something that happens and we move on from it. I can see that that's exactly what he has done. His attitude around these forums is back on track with what I've known from him and I only see him contributing and helping everyone out here on XDA as much as he possibly can. I don't think I've ever seen anyone here spend so much time updating his roms, submitting patches, and responding to others in such a helpful manner like I've seen him do. Now that's the exact type of person I believe deserves a "Recognized Developer" status. Hopefully the majority of you will agree whether or not you hold a grudge against him. I know he doesn't hold a grudge against any of you.

I DO NOT WANT ANY TROLLING OR FLAMING IN THIS THREAD! IF YOU DON'T HAVE ANYTHING CONSTRUCTIVE TO SAY. DON'T POST HERE! YOU WILL BE REPORTED IMMEDIATELY IF YOU DO!!!
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] The Root:
Freaking out every once in a while doesn't make him less a developer or take away his skill and generosity of time and effort.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] REDFOCZ:
I agree with everything you just said.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] jethro650:
Everyone goes through tough times and it shows that by owning up to what happened and why and accepting resposibility, then moving on to make things better overall shows he deserves the status back.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Famos:
I fuxx wit the boiii!!!!! He got dat "celebrity status" roun here...

Cuttn up the bud on my SAMSUNG GALAXY S3.... #KeepIt1Hunid
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Urinophoria:
I agree. He's a fantastic developer, puts out a very high quality ROM; and frankly, if he comes off a bit harsh... its probably something you should have googled. I've learned a ton, just from lurking his thread and asking the occasional question. Development software is essentially beta/testing software, so if you're going to run it... learn.

I flashed half a dozen ROMs to this device before I tried theirs, and now my only flash is for the latest update, which is routinely put out more frequently than any other aosp ROM I've seen.

Task is involved, interested, and more proactive than any paid developer I've ever known, on any platform... and he does gorgeous work for free. Its impossible not to recognize him as a developer, no matter what his title in the forum is.

Edit: didn't know about his kid either.... now I like the guy even more.

Sent from my s3, rockin' AOKP by Task and Ktoonsez
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] djmatt604:
+1. I just started flashing a month ago and Task 14 was my first rom. Great dev, great support, just a reasonable straight up dude. Thanks Task...you deserve it, for simply releasing quality work! Past is the past, simple as that

Sent from my T989D running some serious Jedi Knight Beats injected power
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] 122ninjas:
He's a great dev and he is only following and enforcing the no spoon feed and always search rule

Sent from my SGH-I777
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Roco91:
I've seen plenty of other developers on XDA and other forums get fed up when people don't search or decide to get an attitude because something isn't working for them or they don't get the response they wanted. Some have even left XDA because of stuff like this. Totally unnecessary. Imagine what this world would be like without Task. Very, very dark. He's only human, most of us wouldn't have half the restraint he does.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Urinophoria:
Hopefully he'd just start his own site and carry on. We need him more than he needs us.... he's just sharing something great he did for his own satisfaction.

The guy that made my HTC merge bearable till my uscc contract was up did just that.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] brekec88:
+1 Task makes the best ROM I've ever used on 5 devices. Amazing guy.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] h3lluvaninjuhneer:
Task is human.... OK, maybe superhuman, but we all get tired of out of control noobs wallowing in their laziness and/or ineptitude on these forums, asking the same old questions and not reading the OP. I myself am a noob around here, but developers, mods, and fellow xda-ers who chastise those who fail to follow forum rules have helped me realize it's better to do my own homework. I've seen Task's etiquette improve since the incident on the SGS3 AOKP thread, so it's safe to say he is truly sorry and deserves to have his "recognized developer"status reinstated.

And BTW, unicorns dream of Task's ROMs!
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] hallo13th:
lol wasnt there a "BAN Task" thread to? Good ROMs, quick updates.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] RatusNatus:
I'm 100% with Task.

He could overreact a little bit once but there are some users that push it hard. Push it really hard!!!
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] knownunknown:
±1
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Jirv311:
Eh who cares what title sits under his name. We all recognize him as a good developer and that's all that really matters. :D
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] SeanHacker:
yeah i think i remember something like that. it was kinda funny considering everyone ended up voted that the OP of that thread get banned. lmao.

is there any particular reason you decided to vote NO?
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] oriveradel:
Part of the rules and he broke them, I think he will get his status back in due time. Good Luck
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] wali01x:
ok so i work hard too and we might get 1000 noobs in our thread too, you don't see me or anyone of us freaking out. im sorry but yeah things happen in life and mistakes are made, it doesn't mean you dictate what xda will do or will not do. im not against humanity or wheel of life, but if you are short tempered then let the mods do the job, you don't freak out bluntly on a thread like that. Im with what xda decides best. If you really care for him then help him with his work make his life easier, learn things that are done, fix things that can be fixed by yourself and if its a last resort you can raise a question and then if you get freaked out upon then im sorry that dev is either short tempered or life is not being right with him/her, but then again if life is not being right then don't create a UFC in xda cause it'll just splatter blood everywhere and it just doesn't make sense then to do anything. Ive made mistakes too here and yeah i'll admit i was infracted 5 times and yet i learned from those infractions and i learned to control my temper and learn from mistakes and move on. Xda did what they did for a reason and let them decide what they did is right for community and for everyone's well being, if he doesn't have a title of "recognized developer it won't stop him from doing his work. Also for cluttering threads to create a petition doesn't make anyone better, if you wanna voice your opinion then message the mods directly and if mods don't respond then go step above mods to senior mods and so forth. Also if you're planning to bash me because what i said isn't something what you wanna hear or look at then please don't bother because it won't change me, im gonna do my work, and i'll be here at xda everyday and i'll still be living. just my 2 cents.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] hallo13th:
You were just abusive beyond my comprehension...BUT I have noticed a turn around which is great. I guess I just don't feel I should go against a moderator because I'd assume they took it away for a reason. But you are way more dedicated than 99% of the devs. There should have been a maybe option because no is harsh. Please don't get me wrong task your amazing and we all have things to work on and maybe I need to work on forgiving easier....one of my flaws. As a dev you deserve the title so I guess I should have clicked yes since its a dev title and your a heck of a dev.

On a side note posting this thread in 7 other threads is a little crazy.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] tylerdurdin:
Task you're a good dude.

I for one have started using my One X full time because of the amount of nonsense that noobs trash his threads with. You can only read the words "did you read the OP" so many times before it becomes unbearable. It's not very often a Dev allows normal conversation in their threads with no backlash. Here on the other hand, his threads a ruined by people who do not follow the basic rules of XDA like searching, and posting questions in development. People that can't follow the rules and post questions in development within 20 posts of becoming a member should be banned, and should definitely not be the reason that a Dev loses his title.

You're an awesome Developer Task, and I am shocked to even see this happened.

And that's all I got to say about that.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] trell959:
Task I support you 100% and you're a great dev for the i777. But consequences are consequences. If they did it for you task, they'd have to do it for other people with the same scenario.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] smartguy044:
I dont think a thread should be started for this. Just because he lost his title doesnt mean is going to stop what he does. I know a lot of guys who contribute to the community myself included who has no title. All i can say task just keep doing you because thats all you can control
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] SeanHacker:
i wasn't judging you if that's what ya thought. i was just curious. feedback is how i evaluate things at work, here on XDA, and most other things. ;)
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Noz85:
Task = Awesome.

Title or no title.

I vote yes, His work on the i777 is amazing.

Nuff said.

transmitted from the Dark Obelisk
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] SeanHacker:
this is the General Forum. Not really cluttering anything here. ;)
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] hallo13th:
I didn't think that I just wanted you to know my stance. Hopefully I explained it clearly because I don't want anyone thinking I don't respect what you contribute to our device. A lot of roms get a thread and never updated...you update your rom MULTIPLE times a day because you want the best product out there for your users which is ULTRA respectable.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] BabyHuey:
Wait thats why his titles gone?? Wat did he even break??
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Noz85:
Read the op?

transmitted from the Dark Obelisk
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] wali01x:
he broke the walls down. ~~ from the band fozzy lol :laugh:
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] BabyHuey:
My bad. I didn't think itd be in the op lol
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Noz85:
Lol its all good :thumbup:

transmitted from the Dark Obelisk
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] clay101eve:
Pffft, lame! Task deserves more than recognized developer. Oh, and here's an incoming infraction...

Who fü¢|<¡ng cares if he went on a noob hunting spree a while back... The guy supports a ROM more than damn near ANY other dev in this entire forum. If you can't stand the great, get outta the kitchen!

Someone has to enforce the rules right? If noobs aren't following them, why don't they get penalized? Let's only "penalize" the guy who that has done some of the best work for this community for a rash decision and then hang it over his head for all eternity.

"Justice" is only well served when it is fair. I think his time has been served...

Clay

Team Pirate

Sent from my Buttery Smooth PINK SGH-i777
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] MotoMudder77:
Recognized Developer is earned because he develops stuff.

Yes he was an ass, so. does that make him less of developer?

In my eyes, that status just recognizes him as just that, and has nothing to do with his attitude, or behavior.

revoking dev status should be for those who steal and kang ****, Remember that word foks, and what that crap was about?

If a dev misbehaves, they should be treated with the same punishment as a normal member.

My 2 cents

Dont get it closed Clay...
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Smittyzz:
Completely agree, not just you but with all, and hes still here after it all that also shows something. He does have amazing work, and I think he deserves it 100 percent! Im not the most active member but ive had my fare share of roms and phones:) if I still had my laptop id still be learning how to build roms myself.. but I have a lot going on right now. I hope you get your status back task!

And hes one of a few that will update a rom multiple times a day! Dedication amd drive. Good to have in this world:)
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Jimbroski:
Voted +1!
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] JB calhoun:
Task I use ur ROM I feel like or title should not matter although if it was me I'd never have taken it u have done so much for us u deserve it!! I say go to android spin or somewhere so all the stupid questions are not asked! I know I would xda has turned into a whinny bunchs of people its a joke! We r all adults so we can handle our own affairs.. just let me know of u go else where lol cause I'm right behind u!! Xda would lose hundreds of people I bet on it...the mods need to relax the power trip is getting OLD!!:banghead:
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Nybbe:
+1
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] DonCarluchio:
+1 Task is a great developer I've been using his ROMs for awhile. I don't see his developer status being pulled as making any sense. Despite what happened he's still a developer and does great work. I don't blame him for going off either... look at how many posts I have vs my join date (not that I've been here forever) why? Because I find 99% by following the rules and searching. Really agree with the justice comment, people rip his threads up with useless garbage all the time... So he went off.. Can't he say sorry and we all just get along? People are people we all loose it sometimes, not like its a daily event with him
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] rain987:
I think what is being practice in xda is 2 wrong doesn't make one right. And it doesn't matter who u are or what u contribute as rules are rules. If a title means that u can bend the rules and treat others wrongly then we would end up with a broken system.

Sent from my HTC Desire S
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] wavrunrx:
i believe the "punishment" should remain for as long as Mr. Channon originally planned.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] SeanHacker:
Mr. Channon had nothing to do with it. Assumptions are funny sometimes. ;)

---------- Post added at 12:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:12 AM ----------

Too late. If this were true 80% of the people here on XDA would be banned. For one. The system is broken. For example. One simple clearly marked rule is being broke a hundred times a minute. Using the search button. So this theory is clearly mistaken. ;)
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] rpavich:
I think that Task does a good job.

Having said that, I don't know exactly what he did to break the rules but if he did...then he gets punished.

Simple.

Even if others got away with other things...so?

Even if he's good at what he does....so?

Rules are there for a reason, break them...be punished.

We all have to do it at some point.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] djfotizo:
They will just force the inevitable...

Lets get the equivalent of a "forums.task650roms.com" or something going and give task his personal banhammer :)

+ 1 recognized developer.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] lilbigdude1:
I feel that task should have his status reestablished.... I read the His threads, I also read other developers threads and to some degree there's no real difference in bow he/ they handle the annoying and repetitive questions. Nobody peals a banana the same way, sure he sounds abrasive, who doesn't in text. if you don't have a friggin smiley face, high five, thumbs up every other word. people interpret things in text the way they think they would send it. People are to sensitive. So give him his status back. The man busts his butt for FREE for us.......:thumbup:;):thumbup:;)
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Tweak4fun:
This man deserves his rightful status back.

'Nuff said.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] MrMarkEdward:
Just wanna say THANKS task for all your hard work I dont need to see a title under your name to recognize you as a contributing dev. I have been using your rom for a long time now. I have had issues with my device and just did a lil googling to find the answers. But just know you have many supporters of your rom and we greatly appreciate all your hard work yo have done for us especially with all that has been sent your way in rl. Again TY for everything.:cool:
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] reinbeau:
Thread closed

The status was revoked by administrators after much thought and discussion. What it boils down to is adhering to rules. Just because you see rules being broken does not mean rules aren't being enforced. Patterns of behavior are noted and dealt with. Decisions are never set in stone, which means nothing coming from me, other than that I can assure you humans making these decisions are noting what's going on all the time, your thoughts matter. Now post in a responsible, respectful manner, hit the report button if you see something that concerns you, we will respond. Task can continue his work, if he chooses, the future is always open.