[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] aegeuss:
I am using Galaxy S series from the beginning for years and I kind a feel like Samsung development team decided to move slightly different than we, the customers, wanted. I think somewhere along the road a guy from marketing department told them that it is better to come with new apps in each new phone than to polish what we have in hand. It may sound firm on paper but it sucks in real life. Now, I don't want to insult Samsung software developers in any way or to undermine their efforts in these devices but it's clear every time we have apps working with 75% productivity which is like updating your living room furniture without assembled with all texture for example. I don't want a phone with half baked, new and used applications but a device which is fully optimized.

I'll give you a very simple example: First Galaxy S came with Wolfson audio chip on it, which has still a very good quality. But there was a great place for improvement and a qualified developer, Supercurio, came with Voodoo sound which some of still use it to listen to music. It was that quality. Samsung decided to work with Yamaha in Galaxy S 2 which produced silly and funny results as we all know, which was a big mistake from Samsung team. Now they have included again Wolfson chipset in S 3, which is great. Now what do you expect as an ordinary customer? Samsung uses Wolfson again, they know very well about Supercurio and great Voodoo sound but instead of utilizing him we find that nothing has been done on Samsung side to utilise this. It's like giving a customer a live, unbucked chicken in a restaurant and to say him eat it himself. What is funny here, in ICS Siyah kernel, developer Gökhan Moral, used some parts of voodoo sound code and voila we have a way better sound in our S 3 devices with a two and half years of code. While we, the excited users are trying to get more from our devices the head of developers are sitting in Samsung center thinking about what a useless thing can I bring on the table next time instead of getting it better.

It's the same from the beginning in screen, memory, etc. The did choose not use a simple notification led stubbornly and deliberately for two phone versions for Christ's sake. And we are still waiting for Supercurio to come up with Display Expert who has been working on it for about two years for better color production, contrast, image quality etc. It's funny that many custom kernels use the feature for improving fonts readability. What I am saying is, it's Samsung who should be dealing with these fine tuning things in order for the customer to get the best benefit from the device, not excited developers. It seems to me Samsung is paying a useless salary to many people in software development.

Sorry, it's been a long post but this is what I feel about three years of Samsung experience. The reason I can not get angry to other manufacturers is that they just can't get a quality hardware. So there's not a place for development much in HTC, Sony, Motorola or LG products. Samsung comes with great hardware and spoils it by following HTC; they also used so much energy and time on Touch3D - Sense interface and forgot to improve the rest of the device. Samsung puts too much and unimportant effort to Touchwiz and forgets the rest software.

Regards

GT-I9300 cihazımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi