yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE] afidel:
What filesystem format is the internal memory that's presented as /mnt/sdcard? If it's EXT4 can you link from it to /mnt/external1 that's formatted FAT32?

The reason I ask is I have an RSS client that will only save its cache to /sdcard but I have more saved content from my old phone than will fit in the internal memory (by about 2x) and I was thinking of rooting to be able to do a symlink between the directory on /sdcard and the external card.
[Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE] wingzeroismine:
This sounds interesting, I've got an app or two that default to sdcard even when I change their preferences to external1, would be a good way to make them use the right location without having to navigate to it each time.
[Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE] abortretryfail:
rootfs / rootfs ro,relatime 0 0tmpfs /dev tmpfs rw,nosuid,relatime,mode=755 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,relatime,mode=600 0 0
proc /proc proc rw,relatime 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0
none /acct cgroup rw,relatime,cpuacct 0 0
tmpfs /mnt/asec tmpfs rw,relatime,mode=755,gid=1000 0 0
tmpfs /mnt/obb tmpfs rw,relatime,mode=755,gid=1000 0 0
none /dev/cpuctl cgroup rw,relatime,cpu 0 0
/dev/block/platform/msm_sdcc.1/by-name/system /system ext4 ro,relatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/block/platform/msm_sdcc.1/by-name/userdata /data ext4 rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,nodiratime,user_xattr,barrier=0,data=ordered,noauto_da_alloc 0 0
/dev/block/platform/msm_sdcc.1/by-name/persist /persist ext4 rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/block/platform/msm_sdcc.1/by-name/cache /cache ext4 rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,nodiratime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/block/platform/msm_sdcc.1/by-name/carriercust /carrier ext4 rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,nodiratime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/block/platform/msm_sdcc.1/by-name/tombstones /tombstones ext4 rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,nodiratime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/block/platform/msm_sdcc.1/by-name/modem /firmware ext4 ro,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/block/platform/msm_sdcc.1/by-name/pds /pds ext3 rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,barrier=0,data=writeback 0 0
/dev/fuse /mnt/sdcard fuse rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=1023,group_id=1023,default_permissions,allow_other 0 0
/dev/block/vold/179:97 /mnt/external1 vfat rw,dirsync,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,uid=1000,gid=1015,fmask=0702,dmask=0702,allow_utime=0020,codepage=
cp437,iocharset=iso8859-1,shortname=mixed,utf8,errors=remount-ro 0 0
/dev/block/vold/179:97 /mnt/secure/asec vfat rw,dirsync,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,uid=1000,gid=1015,fmask=0702,dmask=0702,allow_utime=0020,codepag
e=cp437,iocharset=iso8859-1,shortname=mixed,utf8,errors=remount-ro 0 0
tmpfs /mnt/external1/.android_secure tmpfs ro,relatime,size=0k,mode=000 0 0

Here's what it says on mine from the output of 'mount'
[Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE] afidel:
Well, it turns out symlinks don't work on the locally hosted /sdcard due to Fuse. However there IS a solution. I ended up using this tool to do a directory to directory mount. It's quite a hack, and when combined with the chroot Debian install I did on my phone makes my mount table a million lines long, but it does work =)
[Android General] karamelos:
Hi,

i sharing this link for ubuntu user, intallation is very easy for n***

Source webupd8.org, articles link

installation

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:nilarimogard/webupd8
sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install android-tools-adb android-tools-fastboot
[Android General] sagaringale23:
Thank you so much...bro...i have tried each and everything on google but failed every time...your post was really helpful..

THANK YOU
[Android General] CyanogenVietNam:
Thanks so much Bro. Simple but very useful!:D
[LG Optimus Me P350] Ron G:
Please This thread only for Posting bug Reports and for devs to discuss bug fixes.

Don't use this thread for posting Questions and other discussion .

For posting such Questions and other discussion can be use this

Discussion thread

CyanogenMod is a free, community built distribution of Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) which greatly extends the capabilities of your phone.

Disclaimer:

#include <std_disclaimer.h>
/*
* Your warranty is now void.
*
* I am not responsible for bricked devices, dead SD cards,
* thermonuclear war, or you getting fired because the alarm app failed. Please
* do some research if you have any concerns about features included in this ROM
* before flashing it! YOU are choosing to make these modifications, and if
* you point the finger at me for messing up your device, I will laugh at you.
*
* Submitting bug reports on nightly builds is the leading
* cause of male impotence.
*/

CyanogenMod is based on the Android Open Source Project with extra contributions from many people within the Android community. It can be used without any need to have any Google application installed. Linked below is a package that has come from another Android project that restore the Google parts. CyanogenMod does still include various hardware-specific code, which is also slowly being open-sourced anyway.

All the source code for CyanogenMod is available in the CyanogenMod Github repo. And if you would like to contribute to CyanogenMod, please visit out Gerrit Code Review. You can also view the Changelog for a full list of changes & features.

The latest CyanogenMod Nightly can be download here or via ROMManager.

And Google Apps can be downloaded here

Please visit the CyanogenMod Wiki for step-by-step installation walkthroughs and tons of other useful information.

HOW TO REPORT BUGS OR PROBLEMS?

- Was it a hard reboot? Get me the file "/proc/last_kmsg".

- Was it a soft reboot or a "boot loop"? Run "adb logcat" and get me the full output.

- Pastebin links preferred

Sources:

ROM Customisers::The sources no longer refer to pecan but to p350 so your ROMs may need some work to be compatible.

device source

vendor source

If you want help to make this rom more better then you can help via sending patches

HOWTO SEND PATCHES

Getting Started:

http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/Howto:_Gerrit

Example:

- cd ~/android/system

- repo start gingerbread CyanogenMod/android_device_lge_p350

-- Make your changes at device/lge/p350

- cd device/lge/p350

- git add -A

- git commit -a

- cd ~/android/system

- repo upload CyanogenMod/android_device_lge_p350

Navigate to http://review.cyanogenmod.com , click your commit and add Ron Gokhle and Ricardo Cerqueira as reviewer.

If you like this work and Then you can do some Donations

Donations to Rongokhle

Donations to Cyanogenmod

Otherwise I would be grateful if you can click the "Thanks" button on the bottom right of this post.

Thank you to EVERYONE involved in helping with testing, coding, debugging and documenting! Enjoy!
[LG Optimus Me P350] grindelwald:
Hello!

I've installed this ROM on my P350 and found 2 problems:

1) Every time I turn on my phone I get this message. When I click "Force Close" everything seems to work normal then, but I'm not sure why I get this message?! I haven't install single app from market or otherwise on this ROM, and only thing I've changed was OC max cpu from 600 to 652.

2) Second problem is battery drain. I tested it this way: charged my phone to 100%, unplugged it from charger and after 20 hours of not using phone at all battery was at 7%. I haven't tested yet how much it would take to discharge when actually using the phone, but I think it would be 4-5 hours max?

Before this ROM I had CM 7.1 (I can't remember which one exactly) and it would take 3-4 days of not using phone to discharge it, so I don't think it's my battery problem

Kind regards :)

EDIT:

Today I installed latest version of this ROM (cm-7-20120826-NIGHTLY-p350.zip). Now I can't even turn on phone successfully.

It takes a little more than one minute to boot and then following messages appear repeatedly: (only option available to press is "Force close")

I recorded my attempt of turning on phone

[YOUTUBE]hDa9lmd6cC8[/YOUTUBE]

Any solution for this?

P.S. before installing ROM I've wiped data/reset and dalvik cache
[Android] Peteragent5:
Shouldn't we build Android on Arch Linux rather than on other Linux Distros?

Since Arch Linux is a Rolling Release and you'll have all updated packages, so this makes sense to me....

But why did Android recommend Ubuntu? Did Canonical pay them to advertise Ubuntu? LOL
[Android] lithid-cm:
That's what Google chose. In terms of Google support.
[Android] thewadegeek:
What do I need the latest "updated" packages? Arch is bleeding edge, what if a "update" breaks a tool we are using to build? When working in a professional environment you want stability not bleeding edge.
[Android] Peteragent5:
Yeah but usually the stable packages give me the errors... Not the updated ones... Ironic LOL ;)
[Android] lithid-cm:
I'm using Ubuntu and I compile just fine.
[Android] thewadegeek:
Well are you using the versions recommended by the Android team? If not that would be why.
[Android] Peteragent5:
Yeah, I'm starting to reconsider Ubuntu... Arch Linux is a pain to install... Can you still build Android with latest Ubuntu?

I tried to compile a kernel, my os was Debian. The make always gave me errors of outdated packages, so i tried to build the package that was said to be outdated. One package led to another, with a make error saying foo package is outdated -_-

Eventually I got sick of it and I deleted Debian (VirtualBox) and found Arch Linux :D

I got Arch Linux to install and boot, but didn't try building android yet... It was a pain to install Arch..:mad:
[Android] rlasalle15:
I build on arch linux just fine. You just need to prevent 3 packages from upgrading after you downgrade them. Everything works just fine.
[Android] sam.wilder:
Well how I see it is that what platform you use to build a target platform. For e.g. you could compile a Java source code on C platform. Somet
[Android] thewadegeek:
Exactly. Any version of Linux is going to work just so long as you have the needed dependencies installed.
[Android] rlasalle15:
Rootz and the Arch linux android wiki are good sources

http://rootzwiki.com/topic/9287-how...x-64bit/page__hl__+arch++linux__fromsearch__1

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Android

You also must use a java 6 with Jellybean. jdk6 6u34-b04 is in the AUR:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51907

You will need to blacklist Perl, make and git from upgrading after you downgrade them. Also if you use a custom kernel, such as ck-linux in AUR you will need to downgrade the kmod as well. If worse comes to worse I could just get my dependicies list for you guys.
[Android] thewadegeek:
If you want to post it someone could probably use it, I'm using a personalized distro that started life as Ubuntu myself.
[Android] lithid-cm:
You can use openjdk with jellybean.
[Android] thewadegeek:
Yep I would actually recommend it.
[Android] rlasalle15:
I had issues with it at first..it was just easier to do it this way. The AUR makes it easier.
[Android] Peteragent5:
Hmmmm Comparing this with Ubuntu.. A breakdown/summary:

Arch Linux:

You need to downgrade some packages.

Install Java and Necessary packages.

Then you can build Android.

Ubuntu:

Update packages?

Install Java and Necessary packages.

Then you can build Android.

Is this right??
[Android] MikereDD:
J

you do not have to downgrade.

the sun-java6 installs to /opt just source it before building.

I should ask for op or just create a new thread at rootz.

I posted a update how-to

http://rootzwiki.com/topic/9287-how...-on-arch-linux-64bit/page__st__60#entry854543

post #62

Personal build:

My System:

OS: Arch Linux x86_64

Kernel: 3.4.6-2-ck

Shell: /bin/bash

RAM: 313 / 12011 (2%)

CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 960 @ 3.20GHz

Java7 & 6

[typezero@seraphiel ~]

-->$ java -version & android-buildenv & java -version

java version "1.7.0_05-icedtea"

OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea7 2.2.1) (ArchLinux build 7.u5_2.2.1-1-x86_64)

OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.0-b21, mixed mode)

[1] 6045

java version "1.6.0_33"

Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_33-b04)

Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.8-b03, mixed mode)

git

-->$ git --version

git version 1.7.11.3

perl

-->$ perl -v

This is perl 5, version 16, subversion 0 (v5.16.0) built for x86_64-linux-thread-multi

make

-->$ make -v

GNU Make 3.82

Built for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

just a matter of prep'n before builds.

android_bashrc

# Android tools
PATH="/opt/android-sdk/tools:/opt/android-sdk/platform-tools:$PATH"
export PATH=${PATH}:/opt/android-sdk/tools
export PATH=${PATH}:/opt/android-sdk/platform-tools
export PATH="$HOME/android/jb_source/prebuilt/linux-x86/toolchain/arm-eabi-4.4.3/bin/:$PATH"
export ARCH=arm
export SUBARCH=arm
export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-eabi-

# Java6
export J2SDKDIR=/opt/sun-java6
export J2REDIR=/opt/sun-java6/jre
export JAVA_HOME=/opt/sun-java6
export DERBY_HOME=/opt/sun-java6/db
export PATH=/opt/sun-java6/bin:/opt/sun-java6/jre/bin:/opt/sun-java6/db/bin:$PATH
# CCACHE
export USE_CCACHE=1
export CCACHE_DIR=$HOME/android/.ccache

# PS
export PROMPT_COMMAND="date +'( %A, %b %d %R:%S )'"
#export PS1=" ${TQ}\u${R}@${TQ}\h (\W$(__git_ps1 " (%s)") ${LG}-->${P}\$${W} "
export PS1=' \u@\h [\W$(__git_ps1 " (%s)")] \n -->\$ '

#PATH="/opt/android-sdk/tools:/opt/android-sdk/platform-tools:$PATH"

# Alias file
if [ -f $HOME/.prep_files/android_aliases ]; then
$HOME/.prep_files/android_aliases
fi
alias screenabuild="screen -c $HOME/android/.prep_files/.screenrc_android"

P.S. I use linux-ck kernel never had an issue.

-->$ kmod --version

kmod version 9

well I hardly hang here and just happen to see this thread and read thru.

hopefully this post provided something helpful.

Have cookie filled day!
[Xoom Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] integramodder:
I'm running the latest EOS JB nightly and cannot connect to my N network. I played around with the network settings today and get do anything to get it to become visible including changing SSID, changing and removing security, changing channel, etc.

Any ideas?

Attached are network settings. In this screen shot I turned off my 2.4 and was only testing the N.
[Xoom Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bigdave240:
Works for me. Has it ever worked or is this the first time trying? Did it work on previous eos versions? More info needed
[Xoom Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] integramodder:
The wireless N did work prior to doing the radio upgrade, I believe it was version 72. There has also been some miscellaneous glitching in this release such is random turning off of the wifi. I'm considering doing a complete wipe but me to look into how to retain all settings and apps. Any advice greatly appreciated.
[General Questions and Answers] steventrannn:
When I flash a Rom, are the Rom files stored on the SD card or the phone's internal memory? If I format my SD card, will I be able to load my current Rom or do I have to reflash the Rom?
[General Questions and Answers] iKoolkid:
ROM files are found in the internal STORAGE. If you wipe it from recovery, you need to reflash. But if you wipe your internal SD it will still work I think. But you just lost a whole bunch of data.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] JawaH8r:
My preference is the line across the top of the status bar from the MIUI days on my DX. Selecting the line option would hide the icon.

Found an app that will accomplish the first half of this. But it will not hide the icon.

Poke around on ROM Toolbox, but all you can do is change the icons.

Don't mind editing via ninjamorph if that is what it takes.

Running Beans' rom.
[Xperia Play General] af230:
Just found this gaming tablet that could possibly kill the xperia play: http://eurodroid.com/2012/08/29/archos-gamepad-7-android-4-0-gaming-tablet/

It's a seven inch archos gaming tablet running ice cream sandwich. It has two proper touchpads/joysticks and is 1.5GHZ dual-core.

And at £130, it seems like a good deal. Release date is October
[Xperia Play General] Rogue Leader:
Two things

1. The Xperia Play is pretty close to dead, Sony doesn't really support it anymore, its outdated, and its only a matter of time before the new games won't play on it.

2. This tablet is made by Archos, long time purveyors of junky Android products. And its not a phone. This thing firstly is no competition for the Play and secondly is barely going to sell anyway, and the ones that do aren't gonna work very well.
[Xperia Play General] jahjah440:
This is the only alternative to the Play. Or connecting ps3 controller to phone/tablet (eww)

Besides the cheap Android handheld with no warranties.
[Xperia Play General] Trooper_Max:
I think it does sound pretty interesting, I noticed it here:

http://www.slashgear.com/archos-gamepad-gets-physical-for-android-gaming-29244285/

Sounds like they're even incorporating something similar to GameKeyboard to provide physical-button to touchscreen mapping, with automatic game recognition.

Sounds pretty cool, but not sure if it'll be what I'm interested in for a tablet - which I don't see as a direct competitor for the Xperia Play. I was hoping Sony would announce a new gaming phone, but it doesn't look like it yet...

~Troop
[Xperia Play General] 216Monster:
Just adding Droid-Life's post about the Archos device...

Bought a 7" Archos tablet for my younger sister.. I have no complaints about their devices.

But I will never ditch the Xperia Play regardless if its "dead" to anyone

Droid-Life link

http://www.droid-life.com/2012/08/2...ail&utm_campaign=Feed:+DroidLife+(droid+life)
[Xperia Play General] kingvillain:
I must say that this device does certainly look good, as long as the price is right and looks anything like the render shown I`ll certainly be interested.
[Xperia Play General] bangawasawa:
I am no tech-head, but is not Nexus 7 already more powerful than this? I mean with Tegra 3 and stuff...

I am seriously contemplating getting a Nexus 7 for games and I thought pairing it with a bluetooth PS3 controller wasn't such a bad idea, for HOME gaming of course.

Could somebody prove me wrong, or convince me that this Argos thing is a better solution?
[Xperia Play General] Mumups:
No it doesn't... This is a tablet. Tablet and phones are two different things
[Xperia Play General] UndisputedGuy:
The Nexus 7 is more powerful than this and is likely a better device. The Archos tablet has a gamepad which seems to be it's big selling point. The gamepad doesn't look detachable though so isn't like the gamepad seen on the wikipad tablet which is more powerful or just as powerful as the nexus 7. I read somewhere that this Archos device automatically takes games that don't use the controls and makes them work even if they aren't optimised. From what i've read, it'll be under 200 dollars
[Xperia Play General] kingvillain:
Yeah I saw that in a description for the device, it`s using a patented system and currently has compatibility with over a thousand games, I would assume it also has the ability to have the on screen controls programmed in aswell which would expand it further.

If it does indeed release at that price I think I will most likely purchase it as that would be exceptional value for money.

Its actually stated about the controls and the price on eurogamer
[Xperia Play General] james44422:
I'll admit i'm quite tempted by this and can see myself buying one. The price is good, cheaper than my play (£150 Sim Free, it looks like this it will be a little cheaper).

I have heard bad things about Archos but who hasn't heard bad things about sony and still loves their play?
[Xperia Play General] Xcited android user:
A gaming tablet with dual core processor.... I don't think that you can play the newest games with highest textures on this thing...

Sorry for my bad English. It's not my native language.
[Xperia Play General] kingvillain:
There are also details of the Wikipad floating about which will have a 10.1" screen with a resolution of 1280x800 and has "Nvidia Tegra 3 T30 1.4 GHz processor, and it will run with 1 GB of DDR2 RAM, and at least 16 GB of internal Flash memory storage". Sounds interesting again, its control pad will be a detachable one.
[Xperia Play General] TLRtheory:
I've seen a lot of these physical controller solutions brag about being an Xperia Play killer... and ALL of them have failed to get good software/developer support. Most of them don't even hit a 4th of Xperia Play's game compatibility count, and thusly end up in the tier of crap that isn't good for anything but emulation. Xperia Play is the first and only to get relevant, this-generation games. It's good as an emulator, but doesn't have to piggyback off older systems' works to have awesome content... can't say that about the Gametel Controller, iControlPad and others.

So there's no secret that I'm a bit skeptical about this projected figure of 1000 games... if they're serious about that, then we truly would have the first device since Xperia Play to add physical controls AND enough developer support to matter. Don't get me wrong, I'm interested and stoked... but at the same time, skeptical and already seeing problems (size, obviously terrible d-pad).
[Xperia Play General] UndisputedGuy:
I know what you mean TLR, but this Archos tablet seems like it will play any xperia play optimised game and maybe some more
[Xperia Play General] LordBattleBeard:
Game support shouldn't be too difficult if they can do something like GameKeyboard with the ability to load/save/share profiles. This is something Sony should have done with the Xperia play, instead of leaving us completely reliant on each individual company/dev.

That said, Xperia PLAY is a phone and this a tablet and so the two shouldn't be compared. I don't see myself getting this.. why? the whole point of the Xperia PLAY was to get a phone and gaming in one reasonably sized device. If I didn't mind carrying something of this size around with me, with gaming in mind, I'd just buy a Vita.
[Xperia Play General] tezlewis1988:
can i call my friends?
[Xperia Play General] jahjah440:
With Skype, I don't see why not?

This thing is way too huge. 3.5 or 4 inches would have been perfect. 7 inches too big to be portable.
[Xperia Play General] mehdi.moha:
can we have call with that ?

- No

so the xperia play is still the one !
[Xperia Play General] eksasol:
I had several Archos products in the past and while their hardware is good, I dislike their business practice so there is no chance of me buying their future products. Things such as lacking of firmware upgrade and instead bringing out incremental model upgrade. Also locking the harddrive serial to the firmware so you cannot replace it if it dies, I know new devices use flash memory now, but point is I don't see them as a company being close to its fan community. Just my 2 cents.