yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ThePerson98:
I've used Trinity Kernel a few times now and have had stability issues, even without overclocking. I think it has something to do with deep sleep, but whatever it is, it's frustrating. I'm gonna wait a few weeks to let the problems get ironed out before using it again. I'm on CM10 at the moment, and for the most part it seems rather stable, but I do have random issues here and there, and I don't know if they're related to the ROM or not. The only reason I'm on it is because I'm a bit flash happy, and just find the nightly updates exciting.

For most users, my recommendation persists, stick with stock and give the development a bit more time. If a user is feeling adventurous, then your advice definitely applies: Get a good backup, and explore with a multitude of ROMs, for everyone has different tastes and preferences.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] poondog:
Well dear all the people talking about stability issues:

Not flaming, just expressing my opinion:

Morfic's trinity kernels are still experimental releases, I wouldn't be expecting stability because they are not classed as 'stable'

I used earlier versions of his kernels and faced no problems at all

So it depends on which kernel/kernel version as to whether or not its stable

I am on AOKP build 1 and using Faux's 008 mainline kernel, it works very well, super stable and super quick

No issues at all here, I guess because I am on two stable and tested releases
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] tonyboy3:
Originalli created by "dehackers"

My score:

Rom: LeWa Rom 24.08.2012

Kernel: Default

Scrips/Tweaks: Don't use
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] system.img:
I dont trust benchmarks usually to judge a device.

Just my personal opinion.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] B A D R I:
I am using s3 evolution beta 3 ultimate with default kernel and tweaks
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] tonyboy3:
I cant see the image.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] bfo12:
I think this is ok, im using cm 7.2 apocalypse running at 825Mhz :D
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Tovagulet:
Here is mine :)

Running Adrenaline ROM XWKT7 3rd edition

I didnt add tweaks, overclock or anything.

I installed the ROM and ran the benchmark ASAP

I don't know my CPU float-point score is so low...

TOTAL: 1878
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Manvendra05:
Stocklite v7.1 rom...no oc!
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Chester Loh:
This is my Galaxy Ace S5830. I felt too bad performance on my hp. Isn't i flash a wrong rom ?

Firmware version: 4.0.1

Android version: S5830DDKQ8

Baseband version: 2.6.35.7-PERF-CL56211

LIBISC@BATTERYEXTENDERI

Build number: SG111 V1
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] tonyboy3:
Good score for a stock based rom. You can use SD Booster to increase the performance. Use 2048 Kb of cache.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] dredremon:
Mine using cm7.2 vo-1 ROM (some mod by me)

-latest firekernel

-883-245mhz

-heap size 48m

-ram manager (less gaming mode)

-Script

Antutu score
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] subha632:
apocalypse rom with default settings, no tweaks or scripts

Sent from GALAXY ACE
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] subha632:
Sent from GALAXY ACE

---------- Post added at 08:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:04 PM ----------

please tell what scripts and mods you are using

Sent from GALAXY ACE
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] dredremon:
read see the scipt on my screenshot
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Nolep28:
lol , and i think my 2149 was high jaja

i cant post an image cuz im new sry
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Toni5830:
I think this rom is good;)
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Tovagulet:
Don't compare total score. In total.score is included the SD Card speed which is not related to ROMs...
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] canibus13:
CM9 rc1

Apocalypse 19.06.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] SunnyChrono6:
How are you guys getting such high graphics scores?Have you performed any mods on your graphic card?And how come everyone has around the same 2d scores but drastically varying 3d ones?
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Firmino Neto:
Cm7 oficial + adrenaline+ updated adreno
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] dredremon:
Your lucky u can run over 921mhz
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Cryss:
I just wanna share this ...

Thunderbolt Stock rom modded

PSN battery extended kernel

=>
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] ACE_forever:
Impossible----> Fake

:rolleyes:
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Cryss:
Is that so ?

Again ...
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] eduaveoso:
And using my

CM9 RC 4.1 ACE SIII V7

Enviado desde mi GT-I9300 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] ACE_forever:
is that a new version, else its almost impossible to achieve such a high score:eek:
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] ACE_forever:
Ok, my bad. I updated the app and now:D
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] brewy:
Reapers nitrogen elite ;)

NITROGEN ELITE
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Blackstard:
Stock rom

Enviado desde mi GT-S5830 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] ACE_forever:
Woooooow:D
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] brewy:
Nitrogen elite
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] tamingsari2k:
BENCHMARK SETTINGS:

ROM:DEMOCRACY™PERSONAL(Unrelease)

KERNEL:Firekernel22.07.2012

SCRIPT:Adrenaline™Engine4.4+Journalingdisabled

CPUSETTINGS:Min200MHz,Max787MHz

GOVERNOR:SmartAssv2
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] nvky71:
My rom : NVKY-ICS THEME-XWKTQ
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] navneet bajwa:
my score in Antutu was 4221(using droid acev2) and time in SQl benchmarks was 58.88:cool:
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] rushit:
vo1 with adrenaline

last update
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] SuperAce609:
I wonder what's the highest score the Ace's ever had. I myself get 3500's. SD isn't counted though and some other little things. So I can easily get 3600's+.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] gagitrix:
mine is 3500 .. :D
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] JoaoPaulo:
Check out mine ;)

Sent from my GT-S5830
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Lokda:
New record here !

I can't get more than 4139 with "The Ultimatum" & Cronmod INT2EXT4+.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] ItzzAce:
My score

My score is 4127 with sgs2 rom v11.2 and 902 mhz.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] kalm007:
My score is 4320 with xperion v5 rom and 902 Mhz

View attachment 1974557 :)
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] kalm007:
4403 score with xperion v5 921 Mhz

View attachment 1974724

:D
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] fburgos:
My results
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] qashqool:
Even though there are limitations in benchmarking its important that each one of us indicate the rom, kernel and oc if any. Maybe a moderator can say what else could be important to help compare the performance

[ROM] SGSIII JB ROM v11.2 [SpaceCaker]

[kernel]: 2.6.35.7-perf-CL562111 LibiSC@BetteryExtender1

[OC] CPU 806

SD: cat 10 8 G
[HTC One X] MrCEOAdam:
I recently switched from stock install to Cleanrom 4.5 DE,

A few questions:

1. I understand this is AOSP, I am used to Sense's lock screen where it displays message notifications, etc...

AOSP doesn't display notifications and has a very basic lock screen, anyway to get this to show message previews?

2. Voice Dictation doesn't seem to work. Is it just me?

3. I can't seem to enter a PIN for phone security.

4. I can't find out how to enable percentage, I only see a battery icon on the top, while others have posted screenshots including a percentage and CleanRom advertises it includes a battery pecentage in "CleanMods". How do I enable this?

Thanks for the help
[Motorola Droid RAZR] eaglesbaby:
Hey xda team,

Im trying to install the cmda black widow. I wiped data, cache, and reformatted, then flashed, but i rebooted the rom was still stock. What gives?

Thanks,

Shawna
[Motorola Droid RAZR] kintwofan:
What recovery are you using. I if safestrap did you turn in safe systems?
[Motorola Droid RAZR] eaglesbaby:
Yes, safestrap 2.0.
[Motorola Droid RAZR] kintwofan:
Okay, and you went to safe menu and toggle safe system. What does it say when the rom is installing?
[Motorola Droid 4] e183348:
Hi guys, GSM on my droid 4 was working perfectly until this morning. This morning, I noticed an app called "LTE OnOff" and decided to see what it does. I opened it up and changed my settings to "GSM auto (PRL)" and ever since then, GSM has stopped working. I've tried restoring to factory settings, reflashing the GSM patch but nothing works. Any ideas?
[Motorola Droid 4] myfishbear:
if you just cant get it workin just sbf 217 and start from scratch
[Motorola Droid 4] e183348:
Thanks man. I sbf 217 and GSM is back working again. Thanks so much for your help.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] withbloodskies:
A awesome guy from sprint nexus made a flashable led package for me. I asked if I could share with the world and I will.

Make a NanDroid

I recently flashed two ROMs and tried the mod

I received a bootloop "frozen" technically..

I used this on Paranoid Android Jelly Bean

It does work but I believe it will on work on certain ROMs :o

This Mod lights up your LED's Via Charging or Charged

I got the original author's permission to post. Please credit

garyd9

with the authorship. Without whom, we would not have the hack to fix the charging LED.

Hoang81 made the flashable zip for us.

So please thank these two guys.

Here is the link -

Goo.im http://goo.im/devs/qnhoang81/toroplus/Charging_LED.zip

Don't worry it works on VZW and I'm sure other carriers besides Sprint.

I'll put up some pictures later **
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ZeroBarrier:
Fixed? It was never broken, nor was it ever designed to flash while the phone is charging.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] d11dog11:
I use lightflow for this. Does this do a solid light or blinking?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] withbloodskies:
Wait oh.. okay. Its a hack.. So in mind it was needed to be fixed to work even though it was designed not put out a led color.

Solid, I asked for this mod because light flow did not work for me.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] irizwan:
Lightflow works gr8 for me :P i d k abt on JB i havn't jumped ship to JB yet.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nnnnr14:
0_0 how could you not!?

I got 99 problems but bamf ROMs ain't one! -nnnnr12
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] withbloodskies:
Yeah its a jb issue. Sorry should have clarified lol
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] garyd9:
Glad that this stuff works for others. All this modification does is to add support for the BATTERY "virtual" LED at a lower level. AOSP (within framework.jar) already has support for using that LED if it exists. (And that code runs regardless of if the virtual LED is supported or not.)

Take care

Gary
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] tomzefi:
Shave your legs man. Lmao joking. Thanks for the share dude

sent from another GALAXY
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] withbloodskies:
No way lol, I'm a hairy dude.

Anyway updated OP, crucial information please read people.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] irizwan:
=P Flashed it today xD Lovin' the butter.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] spitefulrain:
Lightflow works on JB.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Zzz73:
no-go on toroplus Codename Android 3.6.6. it was worth a shot tho. thanks for sharing the file.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] tomzefi:
Works on latest paranoid android for toroplus.....

sent from another GALAXY
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Tone_Capone:
Does anyone who is using Lightflow have the LED stop at 90% when charging? My charge LED stops working at 90% and up.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mwalt2:
You can change the percentage it changes/shuts off at with lightflow. I have mine orange until 97% and then turn green.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Schneewitzchen:
Nice share btw, works for me
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] withbloodskies:
Do we have specifics of which ROMs this works on? JbSourcery and CNA don't work and I think AOKP, Paranoid Android does work.

No problem but Thank Gary for making it.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] FrostyF7:
I would have been debating on using this but wouldn't a mod like this burn out the led?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 063_XOBX:
If you left the LED solid for 10 hours a day it would last almost 14 years. So I'm gonna go with no.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Tone_Capone:
Thanks for the info. I didn't realize the charging threshold was in the charged indicator settings.
[Galaxy S III General] dragonavis:
http://mashable.com/2012/08/25/verdict-benefit-samsung-apple/

What do ya'll think? Does this make you think twice about any purchase's you make??
[Galaxy S III General] *xda_ace=spades.:
boom boom pow!

samsung must learn the lesson...

"invent uniquely"
[Galaxy S III General] nodstuff:
That actually makes a lot of sense, 1 billion dollars isn't much considering how many phones Sammy sold/will sell on the back of emulating apple.

Best advertising campaign indeed, people will now see that apple are bending them over and banging them without even having the courtesy of using lube when it comes to price.

I kinda knew that somehow apple would be their own downfall and it will be something like this, there is always a case of being too smart for your own good.
[Galaxy S III General] Cdjones187:
Makes total sense.

Apple accuses Samsung of patent infringing features and designs. Meaning you pay less for the same if you go with Samsung. And another thing brought to mind is Apple obviously didn't care to much about the said patents, they settled for 1.05 BILLION dollars, meaning Samsung doesn't have to change a damn thing.

Like the article says

“Best billion dollar ad campaign Samsung ever had.”

IMHO the patents at question are generic to almost ALL mobile OS's, just Samsung can execute much better than any other company and Apple saw them as a threat so the only logical way to go about it was a lawsuit...

My advice to Samsung though, break contract with Apple and quit making iPhone parts! =P
[Galaxy S III General] thyttel:
Oh I'm sure Samsung was just waiting for your advice before they made their next move. Finally ;)

Sendt fra min GT-I9300 med Tapatalk2
[Galaxy S III General] bala_gamer:
1 billion is all what apple can get! what else? they have nothing left in their pocket to accuse samsung...

Samsung has already changed their hardware and software design starting from s3.. Apart from the software patents nothing is going to hurt samsung.

Apple dug its own grave ;)
[Galaxy S III General] jawiz:
No they should not. Keep in mind that Samsung now earns on both their own phones and iPhones, this is business and business is about squeezing out every last dime.

Sent from Heavens using my Angel's
[Galaxy S III General] matttye:
Apple didn't settle for anything. Samsung made offers but Apple took it all the way to trial. The jury awarded 1.05 billion didn't they? Im not that familiar with patent law in the US, but it seems like they've been awarded that amount and it's tough **** if they don't like it.

---------- Post added at 09:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:24 AM ----------

That's really bad advice. You might as well tell Apple to stop selling iPods. Selling components is one of Samsungs main businesses, they're obviously not going to stop doing that for one of their main customers.
[Galaxy S III General] aydc:
I agree that 1 bil $ is too low. Samsung came from nowhere to the top by copying Apple products. They made tens of billions on phones that look exacly like iPhones while their competitors like HTC and Motorola struggled trying to market their not-copied original designs. This is just a slap on the wrist. The verdict should have at least been for 20 bil $ in my opinion.
[Galaxy S III General] EdgaBimbam:
Samsung became top smartphone company because they wasnt sleeping and was giving latest/best hardware smartphones not because "copying" apple..... ^^
[Galaxy S III General] 123shree:
Yep.. totally agree with you.

Samsung's main strategy is marketing. Here in India if you enter a mobile store the first thing they show is a Samsung phone in your budget. They do the same for television sets and refrigerators.
[Galaxy S III General] kyle1b1:
How many iPhones and ipads have sold in the last few Years? To which Samsung supply chips for both, pretty sure the 1+bn dollar would have nearly been paid by apple them selves.
[Galaxy S III General] Apoxx:
You mean rectangular phones with a screen? Car manufacturers make billions as well using the round wheel on their cars instead of developing some other shape. And why is that? Because it's the most optimal shape. Tell me how to make a touchscreen phone without using a rectangular shape with a large screen covering most of the phone.

The problem in this case is apple getting a patent on a god damn generic thing. You wouldn't let someone patent the wheel would you? It's the same ****ing thing.

But yeah, nothing would please me more than this lawsuit blowing up in apples face.:cowboy:
[Galaxy S III General] matttye:
The galaxy S2 and S3 don't look like iPhones, but the original galaxy S looks near identical to the iPhone. Samsung themselves have proved its possible not to copy.
[Galaxy S III General] Aimara:
even a five year old knows what the difference between a galaxy s and iphone , seriously if any company wants to copy a iphone , lol mold it into a exact replica of it , why bother to add two extra capacitive buttons on it
[Galaxy S III General] smfelton:
Well i remember going into an O2 shop with my daughter who was 10 at the time, and she picked up the galaxy s and said wow Samsung are making an iphone.......
[Galaxy S III General] hboos:
I think that Samsung infringed on Apple patents but that those patents were invalid. The jury were given a questionnaire that first set out whether those patents were infringed and then they were asked to discuss whether those patents were valid.. it's seems pretty backward to discuss it like that and I believe that the jury went in with prejudice that the patents were already valid without exploring the matter in more detail.

If you were reading into the trial, you would be more inclined to believe that there was substantial evidence of prior art for most if not all of Apple's patents.

Samsung didn't grow by copying Apple but by offering choice to consumers by flooding the market with differently model tiers and designs. The top tier of Galaxy phones sell well but only make up a fraction of Samsung mobile's sales.
[Galaxy S III General] Tomatoes8:
Exactly, I disagree with Samsung getting to number 2 by copying. I think they earned it fair and square.
[Galaxy S III General] peteri8706:
Apple's retaliation at loosing out on sales to companies which are making better phones than theirs. Seriously Apple, make a more OS unrestricted phone and people may just come back to you.

IOS is dated and too restrictive compared to Android. And people have woken up to this a long time before the 4S was introduced. Apple = sore loosers
[Galaxy S III General] matticala:
Apple is loosing appeal. Many collegues of mine asked me info about SGS [ 2 | 3] because they were grown tired of iPhone and iOS... here and there I read, expecially among fashion/rich youngsters, iPhone isn't cool anymore; reasons are questionable but who really cares?

Anyway there will always be iOS users and fanboys and it must be this way. We need competition to have always a better OS.

About the lawsuit... Samsung copied the whole first wave design and it gaines success only for that. The first SGS, at launch, had very bad performance due to the terrible file-system used. So the lawsuit was lecit.

The real earthquake was SGS2 with its unmatched -among Androids- fluidity... its design was vaguely inspired to iPhone, but not the key to success.

Too bad no one of the jury debated the rightfulness of those patents :\
[Galaxy S III General] LJE:
It's disappointing knowing how easily people are influenced by society.

A chic at work is a diehard iPhone fan..

I showed her some pics of my boys on my S3 awhile back and she was blown away at how bright and clear they were.

She said her next phone is going to be a Samsung... I asked her why she wasn't sticking with apple, and she said

"Everyone's getting Samsungs now"

I was lost for words
[Galaxy S III General] gchindi:
Guys, dont you all think 4 to five years down the line samsung will br in the same situation as apple is now (no more appeal), i think its just a thing of having to go through product life cycle, no company will stay on top for ever, istead the company that will be in 2nd spot will be urging to take the 1st spot, so a decline point will also start for Samsung sometime later.. Its just a matter of time. It all depends on how much they are going to make (achieve) when there are right on top.... There is nothing permanent except changes...
[Galaxy S III General] Tricky103:
The S2 infringed on the punch to zoom and double click to zoom patent which I think is IMO not patent worthy. Imagine not being able to pinch to zoom.. This should be a generic patent also..

Edit.. Also the bounce back on scrolling patent. Which is also bull****..

The S3 was not included in this case.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Punch to zoom? Now thats a new one. :p
[Galaxy S III General] hefonthefjords:
Most people in the general population just refer to every smartphone as an iphone regardless of design or manufacturer so its pretty much irrelevant what apple is whining about since most people dont know or care about the difference between any of the products in the catagory. Most people just take whatever their carrier offers them as "the very latest phone" at the time of their contract renewal.
[Galaxy S III General] matttye:
That guy is some kind of Samsung promoter. His story just screams fake.

---------- Post added at 09:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:19 AM ----------

They brought it in at the same time as karate chop to screenshot :p
[Galaxy S III General] MadBob:
I think the kiss of death was when a judge said that Apple products where cooler than Samsung :D show me one young person who wants something their dad thinks is cool.

That signed their decline if nothing else.

Not really surprising that a court in the USA found for a USA company's product, compared that to the rest of the sane world, where the rulings have been a little more realistic.

My sister in law has been an iPhone user for ever, she asked me about the sgs3 yesterday and will not be getting another iPhone, they are just not "with it" any more. The iPhone 5 will have to do something "innovative" (not in the Apple sense of the word either) to stay relevant. And from the past 5 years I have only seen tweaks not changes in the iPhone.

Btw I also own an SGS1 and iPhone 3GS never managed to get them mixed up!
[Galaxy S III General] LJE:
Good to see Samsung get on with things.

What they need to do now is to bring out a top of the line device that blows everything else out of the water.

Especially while the media is all over them.

http://thenextweb.com/mobile/2012/08/27/samsung-more-innovative-than-apple/

http://m.digitaltrends.com/music/samsung-launches-the-galaxy-player-5-8/

http://m.techcrunch.com/2012/08/27/...ng-doubles-down-on-chips-puts-974m-into-asml/

http://m.engadget.com/2012/08/27/samsung-series-5-teaser/
[Galaxy S III General] sohebq:
I remember how much people criticized on the design of sgs3, I supported the design and liked it. The one reason for liking was that it's totally different in looks from iphone. This lawsuit should give enough boost to samsung for making more developments in terms of design and software updates.

Someone above me quoted that the product life cycle of samsung might change in near future. I don't think so that Samsung will go to decline that easily. It's all about developments. Samsung is making right changes at the right time unlike apple.
[Galaxy S III General] biffsmash:
i give up reading all the patent warfare now. I honestly think its simply to keep both companies in the limelight and saves them both money. Samsung save money on ads, apple get cheaper parts for their phones, and lawsuits force innovation from both appe and samsung.

I would argue they are all as bad as each other.
[Galaxy S III General] Arsaw:
Finally, Google responded :

http://www.androidcentral.com/googl...e-android-os?utm_source=ac&utm_medium=twitter