yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Windows Phone 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] orbitalen:
What I want to do is not to play with the proximity sensor itself but rather with the buttons on the screen during a call. I guess I didn't make myself clear enough, sorry about that. :) The idea is that when I'm in a call, the proximity sensor does not work properly and I always press either the Mute or the Hold buttons. So, these buttons can still appear during a call but when you press them, I don't want anything happening. I mean, the idea is even when the phone is not next to your ear and the screen is active during a call, pressing the buttons to do nothing. I'm just following some simple logic, which might of course be incorrect (or too simple), but I'm thinking that there is most probably a separate registry for each button that controls whether this button does some action when pressed or not. I'm also hoping that they'll be separate registries for each button so that I can, for example, disable the actions for the Hold and Mute buttons, but leave the End Call button active. The problem is that I have no idea where to look for this registry since I'm still new to WP OS.

Heck, it would even be OK for me to completely remove the buttons from the screen during a call (or substitute the current buttons with some 1x1 px transparent images), if that's possible, so if someone knows how to do even that, tell me. :)

I was also considering using the power button when in call but I first want to see if there is any other way to do what I want. And since I'm not using the Mute and Hold functions at all, I just thought about disabling them. :)
[Windows Phone 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GoodDayToDie:
No, I understood you. I was suggesting the "fix your proximity sensor" option because normally, the problem you're experiencing just doesn't happen; that's what the prox sensor is for. Sometimes it's miscalibrated, though, or something is covering it up (some poorly-cut or installed screen protectors do this, for example).

The "Phone" app isn't a Silverlight app like third-party ones; it's a native EXE that we pretty much can't modify without using a custom ROM. That's going to make changing it the ways you suggest (disabling or resizing certain buttons, etc) quite difficult.

I'm pretty sure you don't want to disable all the buttons always, even if that were possible. For one thing, that would prevent you from hanging up, as I mentioned before. It would also prevent you from dialing any numbers, which would make the use of touch-tone automated services impossible.

The Power button option really seems like the best fit for you. It's easy, doesn't require any hacks, doesn't break any other functionality, and should be the next-best solution beyond actually solving the problem.
[Windows Phone 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] orbitalen:
I see now, makes sense. In my head it sounded simpler than what it really is. :) I was considering resizing the buttons because I'm also using iOS and I quite enjoy digging in the OS and changing some elements, so it's possible there to, for example, substitute some buttons with transparent 1x1 px images, etc. But that's irrelevant. Looks like WP is different and I still need some time to get in to it. Anyways, thanks for your help.

P.S. The screen protector was the first thing I "accused" but unfortunately it wasn't causing the problem.
[Windows Phone 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GoodDayToDie:
On a custom ROM, you could definitely tweak the Phone app if you wanted to. However, the way WinCE (the kernel behind WP7) works, OS files are almost always marked as "in ROM" which means that the filesystem driver will refuse to modify them while the OS is booted. This makes tempering with the stock OS difficult; we have to find ways to modify the behavior of apps and system features without modifying the apps or features themselves.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] clepsy:
Hello to all,

My friend want to buy a one xl second hand and I want to know before getting the phone what are the particular things to this phone that need to be checked before

Also how can I check if the phone is not a fake or I don't know if even already exists a fake on the market, any guide will be welcome, I will meet today with the guy

Thanks,

Oh and I want to mention that he will use the phone on a GSM network and as the phone support it should be no problem

The guy mentioned that the phone was unlocked from his carrier, is there any problems that can occur here? let's say if I'm going to flash custom roms the phone get locked back? how can be unlocked?

thanks again
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] redpoint73:
To tell you whether the phone will work on your friend's carrier, we would need to know what country you guys are in, and what version of the phone you are buying. If its a GSM system, the phone SMS, and WiFi should all work. But whether 3G and LTE will work, depends on whether your local carrier is compatible with the bands on the phone. Also, your carrier must offer MicroSIMs, as that is what the phone accepts. I believe any carrier that offers current versions of the iPhones or iPads should have MicroSIMs available.

Don't know if there are any counterfeits of the One X/XL that could really be passed off as the real thing. I think somebody posted a video of a phone that was supposed to be a clone of the One X, but it was a cheap piece of crap that could never be confused with the real thing (looked like cheap plastic, twice as thick, etc.). If you have seen/handled the phone in person, I doubt there would be a counterfeit that could be mistaken as real. The one piece polycarbonate body, gorgeous screen, and the general build quality are probably not going to be anywhere near matched by a cheap knockoff. If you haven't seen a One X/XL in person, least watch some videos of what the phone looks like.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] clepsy:
Much appreciated your feedback, it is orange Romania, i don't know from where the phone is all he said it was unlocked to be able to use o any carrier on a service, I will check with my microsim if it works

Just a question, it is worth to change if the one xl is ok with my gnex?

Thanks again
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] redpoint73:
Based on this Romania uses GSM 900/1800 for Voice and EDGE data, and UMTS 2100 for 3G data. Those bands are extremely common, and used in most of Europe, and other parts of the world. Just about any version of the One X/XL should be compatible. You should be okay in this regard. But you may need to find your carrier's data network APN settings and enter them manually, in order for data to work. You should be able to find the APN settings for Orange Romania by Googling.

Never owned a GNexus, so can't personally say. The One XL has a better CPU, gorgeous screen, and beautiful build quality. I know folks on here have switched to the One X and love it, while others prefer the AOSP nature of the Nexus series, and the developer support. Whether its the right switch for you depends on your personal needs and preferences, budget, and how much a One XL would cost you.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] clepsy:
Got the phone, seems good and my friend picked up, it is an international one x not one xl as I thought, phone is very nice

thanks for support
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] yankele:
Hey guys just wanted to share this picture I took over the weekend at Target

Looks nice next to the usual players!
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] 2k4mach:
ummm either im blind or there is no pic lol
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] yankele:
I don't know why it's not uploading!

Let's try again...

View attachment 1287963
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] typhoonikan:
I was looking for these at bestbuy about a month ago or more. Then I realized such things didn't exist. Nice to see play market has cards out like iTunes now.
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] yankele:
I know and it's actually a nice option to have, I mean most of the people I know have an android device so this will make a great gift!
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] DarkManX4lf:
This is pretty cool. Should come in handy at holiday season.
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] jaswad23:
Confirmed in South Florida
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] yankele:
I know it just makes sense to have this option... And I think people will be spending more money in the play store this way!
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] yankele:
I took this pic at a target in spring valley, NY
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] MrsHoneyDip:
Does anyone know if it's reloadable? This would be a great gift option for my kids.

Sent from my EVO
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] zisix:
Does anyone know if you can use them to add funds to Wallet?

I'm never giving Google my CC info, but I'd use Wallet more if these can add funds too.
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] stevemoffler:
Better watch out though apple might throw a bf about these saying they invented gift cards and they are.rectangular with rounded corners lol

Sent from my LTEVO
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] yankele:
That's funny, but hey.... Even refrigerator makers should watch out for this patent!

Sent from my EVO LTE running CM10
[General Questions and Answers] mattyonesix:
So about a month ago I rooted my Droid X2 to CM9. Recently, my X2 has been rebooting itself at random times, so I want to sbf back to factory settings. My internet was down for about a week and I couldn't stand my phone rebooting itself anymore. I found a forum thread (on another website) that said you can unroot your phone without a computer (bad decision on my part). After reading numerous posts saying that it worked, I did it. Well here's the kicker, it unrooted itself but I'm still on CM9. Now that I have my internet back in operation, I can now sbf my phone... well that's what I thought. I downloaded RSD Lite and the sbf files for the X2. The problem with this is, now I can't install RSD Lite. When I double click on the file, it asks me to pick a program from a list. I also downloaded and burned 1KDS iso. After restarting my PC and I boot into his script, it asks me if I want to SBF with the possibility to root later, I select that option. I also put my phone into RSD protocol support. After the script starts, it'll either say a file was killed or a bunch of errors will show up. Does anyone have any idea how to fix this?
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] HellsAngel_NL:
Now that ics is out and working great on the transformer (i have a sl101 myself but same thing basically) and being able to force

the gpu to do the 2d stuff i thought it might be worth a shot to make a kernel with lower clock speed like 500-600 mhz max

and lower voltages maybe its also possible in the kernel to lower the wifi strength to get the absolute max battery life.

Other kernels are all for more speed so battery life isnt as great as stock.

Im no programmer or would know how to do this myself else id try but it seems like a feasable idea if anyone wants to try,

now we can force the gpu to do the 2d stuff the cpu should be able to go lower without a performance hit.

so good idea or bad? lol
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] just lou:
If you're using another kernel, you can already set the min-max speeds if you want to underclock. Some of them allow undervolting too.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] HellsAngel_NL:
No i run stock as that seems to be most stable and best battery life.

I know a custom kernel can be underclocked with additional program but im guessing more can be done when

compiling your own kernel but im not too sure.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] cja1972:
Happy to report that Samsung drive- link works fine on our nexus :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] cja1972:
Here's a link if u want it

http://db.tt/wourkuBL
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] wej1976:
Cheers all looks to work OK apart from the weather. Presume it needs something from touchwhiz for that to work?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] fubu2k:
so does it work with Sony xav-601bt ? :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] wej1976:
I dont have such a fancy car head unit to be able to try that. I cant see any references to mirrorlink in any of the setting screens either.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] cja1972:
All works via Bluetooth. Can't get weather to work but everything else is ok
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] fubu2k:
i will test the app with mirrorlink and the audio car unit sony xav601bt on saturday. i will give you feedback...

the accuweather does not work. maybe its because of missing samsung rom components
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] cja1972:
The weather doesn't work on the s3 either :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] cja1972:
Installed AccuWeather yesterday rebooted and weather now working. Not sure if it was the reboot or the installation but you can see something made it work.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jayprime:
This app installed and looks great on my GN. But this app doesn't look like it likes the on screen home and back buttons. I just got my GN from the play store so I am a bit of a noob to the GS. Anyway I can make the on screen home keys go into landscape or just go away?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] teusxvc:
Thanks for the info..

Now works With accuweather installed..
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mad_vtak:
My img looks different from what others posted. I installed accuweather and enabled everthing and rebooted, still no weather on my end help?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mad_vtak:
bump for help?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] cja1972:
I guess it might depend what ROM u r on.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] fubu2k:
do you use mirrorlink on your nexus?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] eldis:
The newest version (1.1.012) is now working on my SGS3. Link
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] DirgeExtinction:
But will it work on the GNex?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] drake2007:
Working on Galaxy Note 2

Thanks for the link! I installed in my Galaxy Note 2 and now works as expected
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] babyboy9964:
How did you manage to connect your Note 2 to the MirrorLink??? When I try to connect my Note (1) with the DriveLink app, I only get "USB Device not supported" or "Reestablish the connection to your smartphone"?

Do you have the stock ROM used?

Thanks!

BR

Refik
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] slvrblt00:
I have a galaxy nexus running 4.1.1 bootloader unlocked and rooted. I have installed the TM server app files from a few posts up and the newest version of drive link app. I am still getting the "usb device not supported". Do you have to have usb tether working to be able to make this work? Anything else that I could try. I have had the sony xav601bt for a while and want to get this working. Thanks in advance.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] bimerguy:
Pls help get mirorlink to work on GN and Sony xav 701hd...

Looks like you guys got this working on your galaxy nexus downloading drive link but I still cannot get past the "usb device not supported" when connecting usb cable between Sony had unit and vzw GN smartphone. And then drivelink GN and Sony says Reestablish your smartphone connection.

The Sony head unit is a great upgrade to my sound but the mirror link would put it over the top with such a great display.

As always, that you for all the help in advance.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] acemccloud1:
Folks,

what are the chances that we can have DriveLink on SG Grand Duos GT - i9082? I downloaded the APK file and tried installing it on my SGG. The installation was successful, but when I tried to run the app, it threw up an error saying that it had to close :'(

Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] impidan:
how to get this working on my XAV601BT with my GNex?

i DL the app from this thread, and i am always getting "Device not supported" message on screen? Someone also said it works via bluetooth? how to do that?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] gamerayers:
Any chance there is progress with this? I'm looking at picking up a JVC headunit which supports MHL and mirrorlink, my Gnex is coming today in the mail and I want to know if I should order the headunit or not. Thank you.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] fopoku2k2:
I've got a Samsung galaxy s3 rooted in stock rom

Drivelink r3 works as supposed but I've realised it's very coppy and slow. Lots of lagging esp. on YouTube.

This makes using Drivelink very boring and a drag

Anybody experiencing this?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] drezz2:
Hello, I know it has been a long time, but the links are down.

Does anyone have hand what it takes to make it work?

The result is good?

I basically want it to use sygit / maps here .. in the "radio" Car

thanks
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] drezz2:
someone remembers something about this?
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] saleenman95:
I would like to start a petition for a forum dedicated to the 3.6 and 4.2 devices. If you would like to "sign" this petition just reply with you username.

Thank you for your support!
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] anthonws:
anthonws
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] baladev:
baladev
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] serosis:
serosis
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Kolse:
Kolse
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] android@system:-$:
android@system:-$
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] safariking:
safariking
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Erdubya:
Erdubya
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] caseyatbt:
caseyatbt

Sent from the Delta Quadrant using XDA Premium
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] h2o64:
h2o64 ;)
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Quentinga:
Quentinga
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] alice90:
alice90
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] saleenman95:
Bump, anyone else to sign?
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Yippingbyrd:
What's the point of just typing my username when it's right to the left of this?

Yes I want this.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] safariking:
I have talked to a moderator and he tood me to place it here:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1660354&page=302

See post 3015 and please +1
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] zebluk:
zebluk
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] SerkTheTurk:
SerkTheTurk
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] markymark567:
Yes. Need to spark more development for these devices.

+1
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Tacsi566:
Tacsi566
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Ozelot64:
Ozelot64
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] joemhewitt:
This isn't gonna happen. There isn't even a separate forum for 5.0 and 4.0 devices.

§€ñt ₣røm m¥ gãlãx¥ ₱lã¥€r
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] :
arceusg. The 4.2 and 3.6 don't have too much development going for them, but a dedicated forum would help a lot. Even id it was a subsection of the 4.0 and 5.0 forums, 4.2 and 3.6 owners really should have a place to congregate and develop.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] asheehanjr:
asheehanjr :D
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] servalan:
servalan
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] jkarloz:
jkarloz
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Androthan:
MrBrubble

MrBrubble
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] mauro2390:
The same here
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] JanekLeVert:
JanekLeVert
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] GURCU:
Gurcu

Gurcu
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] MNguyen281:
What would help a lot is if more people bought these devices. This "petition" isn't going to accomplish anything. Custom roms and fixes don't just spontaneously pop up out of no where. Developers need to make them. In order to develop, they need to have the devices. A dedicated forum for these devices would be a) a waste of space and b) empty anyway because even now, there are no uh informational threads or anything about the 4.2. What makes you think having a dedicated forum would change that?

---------- Post added at 07:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:16 PM ----------

This is coming from a 4.2 owner who is fed up with the abysmal performance of his device doing basic tasks and would kill for an overclockable kernel and lighter faster rom =(
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Eins7ein:
I would like to add my hat to the ring. I'm an epic 4g owner but my daughter was gifted a 4.2 for xmas. I would love to give her device the same love I've given mine.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] ChaosChris:
ChaosChris

Gesendet von meinem Nexus S mit Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] KOala888:
give me sources, find someone to compile and I will make the kernel ;)

really
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] diego930:
diego930 ;)
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] allegro43:
allegro43

Sounds good to me, too.

We can better pool our ideas and skills about any custom kernel or ROM.

We can better show any helpful developer what we're trying to do, and where our unsolved issues are.

Because of our smaller numbers, it's been easy for us to not see our own threads which get lost among the 4.0/5.0 ones! For example, I only found this Petition thread recently. So I must have missed it for months, even when I'd been checking the forum for 4.2 developments.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] bso44:
clankfu
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] MarineMan215:
I think it will help to organize things, plus existing threads for the 3.6 and 4.2 can be moved right?

Stupid me tried to make another thread addressing this but found nothing since you didn't use the word "separate" in the title... :silly:

MarineMan215
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] zephy09:
zephy09
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] PerChloric Bread:
Well maybe if we reach a respectable amount of posts on this thread we can show 3.6/4.2 community is not as small as people say :p
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] maseltrdf:
Agree

Maseltrdf
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Karim.younus:
KarimYounus
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] mymo82:
mymo82
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] hanjosep:
hanjosep
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] computertechie98:
Sign

computertechie98
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] dugoy13:
dugoy13
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Quentinga:
Why xda admin don't add 3.6, 4.2 device in this sub-forum ?

'Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0' -> 'Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6, 4.0, 4.2, 5.0'
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] markymark567:
because they are so different and because there is so little activity for the 3.6 and 4.2. there is only a couple people actually developing for these devices

Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Quentinga:
Also they can create a sub forum like 'galaxy y/y duo' because 4.0 and 5.0 have similar soc (exynos), 3.6 and 4.2 (omap)

It's not for me but for user, it's more clear.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] pickl3dpurpl3:
pickl3dpurpl3
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] krzee:
If making another subforum would somehow take more resources I would agree that it is pointless. That is not the case. Because there is more activity for the other devices it would be nice for users to not need to sift through tons of posts about unrelated devices.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] GeOrDaNoOo:
Agree

GeOrDaNoOo
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] crash831:
crash831
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] spider1371:
spider1371:)

Enviado desde mi GT-I9300 usando Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] MetaMav:
MetaMav
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] micnicmic:
micnicmic
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Matoxxi:
Matoxxi
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] SerkTheTurk:
Instead of seperate forums they should just rename it to Samsung galaxy players. My opinion..

Sent from my YP-GI1
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] drakonizer:
drakonizer
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] 64kb:
64kb
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] diego930:
diego930
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] JaylanPHNX:
I agree with this, but either way I would like a more organized space for the 3.6.

Sent from an N4 blessed with AOKP and sanctified by Faux123!
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] khriztianjs:
Khriztianjs
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] kdng:
kdng
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] 64kb:
Sure, why not.

64kb
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] glits:
glits
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] akumaknight:
akumaknight
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] ubik3:
ubik3

(I'm here only for my 4.2... for now... eh eh)
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Wilfred7:
Wilfred7
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] ciruppa:
ciruppa
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] pball52998:
pball52998

Even though I lost my 4.2.......

Sent from my Rezound. CyanogenMod 11. S-off
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] servalan:
Agreed, then have sub catagories.

You search for Samsung galaxy player 4.2 and you get kitkat custom roms come up :confused:
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] dbouchy:
dbouchy

:good:
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] shazoo00oo:
shazoo00oo