yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] j_q999:
I just installed a ROM which is JellyVanilla 1 rev 2 on my Mango.

Everything seems pretty good until I realize that my keyboard onscreen won't come up.

I have follow the step :

1. Flash kernel for your device (Mini, MiniPro, Active, LWW)

2. Enter CWM

3. Wipe data / factory reset (not so necessary if CM10 is currently installed on your system)

4. Wipe cache & dalvik-cache

5. Flash JellyVanilla 1 rev2

6. Flash yourdevice_dev_files.zip (Mini, MiniPro, Active, LWW)

7. Flash GAPPS (optional)

then reboot.

The problem is the keyboard on screen won't come up. The hard keyboard work pretty well but when I slide the hard keyboard the screen doesn't automatically rotate like before/usual.

Everything else except those keyboard problems went pretty good.

Anyone can help me? I'm thinking on flashing some part of FXP CM10 source but I don't which part is exactly for those keyboard problems.

Thx before..
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] raddums:
On the keyboard settings menu in the status bar..turn off the hardware keyboard..that did it for me.

How's the in call volume for you?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] j_q999:
Jeez..just realize..in call volume was to low..and also my ringer/notification volume..

Did u got this too?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] raddums:
Yup!! Too low..couldn't hear anything. Right now I'm back on stock ics
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] huiggi:
I just got my Nexus 7 and I have problem with getting $25 for Google Play outside the USA. When I'm entering the credit card number it shows:

“The credit card you have entered does not qualify for this promotion.”

I tried 3x Visa and 1x MasterCard. Am I doing something wrong or maybe it's somehow fixed already?
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nickhammond121:
I got mine yesterday, and once turned on and signed in I had my £15 (UK based)
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] huiggi:
That's great, but what could I do wrong? Btw. It shows me £15 too.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rootusr:
are you using a US address when registering the credit card?
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] huiggi:
Yes, United States with ZIP code 10002 and phone number (202) 9255599.

EDIT/

I did everything one time again and this time it worked, I got the mail and $25. :)
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] E_Goldstein:
Got mine today totally forgot to do it in dollars took my £15 lol
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] pairustwo:
So I've been updating nightly version of JellyBean which means like 10 or more flashes in the last couple of months.

One the latest flash I realized that my Google Play Music app wasn't reading my Google Play Library from google servers. I could browse my library on the phones browser but not from the app.

Things I've done:

App menu>settings>Refresh

Restore data from Titanium Backup.

Use Darkside Cache Wipe

Restart

Uninstall / Reinstall

Settings>apps>Google Play Music > clear data

Restore older backups from Titanium Backup

Gone on line to play.google.com/music/settings and deleted all the different versions of my phone that were listed as devices (apparently each time I flash a ROM Google thinks it is a new device).

None of these things has fixed the problem. When I reinstall or refresh the app I would expect the device to turn up on my play.google.com/music list of devices but it doesn't. the app seems to have lost all contact with google.

I'd like to try to disconnect my account from the device and add it back but I don't know how to do that. I could add another account to my device and then try to switch between them -but currently I only have one account and I can't "unplug it."

Thanks for any help
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] pairustwo:
Here is what I didn't try: turning Sync on.

When I did that it synced. Go figure. I've never had to go into this setting before but there it was.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
Hello to all.

So here I am new to this forum and I am not speaking to the original, I ask you in advance to please forgive me for my bad english.

So here is my problem now time for 2 days.

This provides a backup made ​​in CWM, I always used to make a backup from CWM Recovery, except that recently, I have a big problem to restore the last.

In fact, when I try to restore, everything goes well for restoring boot.img, system.img, ect. except that in the middle of restoring / data, the operation freezes and stops with the message in the last line: "Error while Restoring /data"

So I thought a corrupt backup, which is not the case, I had enough space on my SD card (8Gb around, the backup actually 3Gb and more).

After a wipe cache, wipe data then a factory reset, then flash to a newer firmware (XLFB), still the same problem.

After doing some research, I realized the problem: my data part is larger than 2GB, and that I understand, beyond, the restoration of data fails. ..

So I thought of you, and a way to cut or compress the /data, because I saw somewhere that someone could manage to compress the /data with the option of compression TWPR's Recovery.

Problem: TWPR is not available for the GT-I9300 International version. :crying:

A solution? I thank you in advance. :)

ErwaNetwork.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JJEgan:
Are you using the same version CWM recovery you backed up with ??

jje
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
Yes, it is the same, it comes from the CF-Root v6.4

This is version 5.5.0.4.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
Anyone ? :crying:
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
:crying:
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JJEgan:
Bumping posts is banned .

jje
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
Sorry, i'm very desperate :(
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
No reponse ? :(

Please people, I m very unhappy :(
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Arsaw:
Why your backup is more than 2gb? Too many apps? Games?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
Yes, a lot of games :(
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Arsaw:
Temporarily solution:

Backup with titanium. Uninstall them and then backup with cwm. Should get your nandroid backup below 2gb.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
But I can not access in my backup, how can I make a backup and then uninstall the applications they are already packed in the backup?!? One way to do your manipulation without to be in the backup? Because I'm on a new interface, so it's all gone (except for the multimedia data that are stored on the external SD card).
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Arsaw:
You can try use Titanium to restore apps from nandroid.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
Ok, thanks ! But, how can I uninstall the applications which are in the nandroid backup after a backup with Titanium ?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Arsaw:
Have you try restoring your nandroid using advance restore menu in recovery?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
Yes, I tried, but it returns the same result.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
Any suggestion?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
Up ?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Arsaw:
Trying to modified your nandroid could brick your device during nandroid restoration.

Do this at your own risk:

Copy nandroid to PC, use 7-zip to open data.ext4.tar and looks for

Apps folder. Delete those games apk.

Clear all content in the dalviks folder.

In the data folder, delete those related to your games.

Save and exit

Copy back your nandroid file to your phone.

Your nandroid md5sum will not match. So open terminal emulator and type

adb shell

# cd /sdcard/clockworkmod/backup/2012-06-29.18.20.43

# rm nandroid.md5

# md5sum *img > nandroid.md5

Now try to restore your nandroid again. Hope no more error.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] LemonPlusTea:
my nandroid backup is 3.2GB in size. restores fine for me.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] member68:
Update to CWM 6. It supports backup files >2GB and will allow you to restore any future backups.

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
It's not the complete nandroid backup, but just the data partition which is too larger than 2GB.

My complete nandroid backup is 3.57GB
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
It works with backups made with older versions of CWM?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
Thank you very much Arsaw I keep this solution carefully below the elbow! :)

On the other side, you should have a secondary solution to prevent blockage: a way to compress a .tar file (which is already an archive) to make it less/smaller than 2GB?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ErwaNetwork:
Up
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] member68:
Unfortunately, no. You have to create a new backup.

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Infy_AsiX:
Wow is this for real? Thanks a lot for this thread TC. Been trying to restore a full backup for the first time and hitting this road block. Will have to try cwm6 now
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RocketOptics:
Thanks, truncated nandroid file worked.

Thank you! This worked for me.

Note: When generating the md5 checksum, I did it for all the *.tar files, not *.img files.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] thekiosk:
many thanks dude! my prob has been solved. :good::good::good::good::good:
[Thunderbolt General] Tiezane:
I've searched and search, but I see nothing about CM development for the 'Bolt for ICS or JB. Has anyone picked up that torch yet? Has it been deemed too large of a project, or just no interest? And of course, if I've missed something, please feel free to give me a swift kick to the head.
[Thunderbolt General] rmkilc:
I am wondering the same thing. Is the ICS leak enough to get some CM9 or CM10 builds going?
[Thunderbolt General] androidsupra:
Once the ril is adapted to work with aosp I suspect there will be stuff kicking again
[Thunderbolt General] disconnecktie:
This doesn't need to be in the development thread. Think about it before you post. If you got a question post it in q and a.
[Thunderbolt General] gammaxgoblin:
Seriously?
[Thunderbolt General] Tiezane:
My apologies if I posted in the wrong section, since I was specifically asking about CM development potential, I thought this would be right. I've never claimed to be more than a half-witted n00b. So just to be sure, if I were actively working on CM, it would be ok to post about the progresses there?
[Thunderbolt General] Tiezane:
If that is directed at me, yes, it was a serious question.
[Thunderbolt General] disconnecktie:
If you have a rom in the works yea go for it. But the op should have stated that the rom was in the works at the very least. There is no point in cluttering the development thread with q and a. As far as I know there isn't official cm9 or 10 development for this phone. I'm sure someone will pick it up (probably workshed).
[Thunderbolt General] Tiezane:
Thank you, and sorry again. I promise to cast off the shackles of newbishness soon!
[Thunderbolt General] disconnecktie:
Its no big deal. All the noobs have come out now that ics has dropped and its kind of frustrating.
[Thunderbolt General] Tiezane:
In my defense, I've been around on here and the nook color forums for months now, but still wet behind the ears when it comes to figuring out which forums to post in :)
[Thunderbolt General] disconnecktie:
I think we all have at least once. Its hard not to sound like a douche when you tell people they posted in the wrong forum.
[Thunderbolt General] Tiezane:
No offense taken, trust me. I feel bad that people keep having to moderate me. So back to the original topic, IS anyone openly working on CM 9 or 10?
[Thunderbolt General] plambda:
There are people working aosp builds, don't know if they're cm based or not. I'm sure there will be a cm port eventually.
[Thunderbolt General] animez:
I had read on other forum threads that CM9 was going to be officially supported for the TBolt. Seems like it was in the Thundershed 1.6 thread but I'm not positive about that.

Sent from my Liquid ICS TBolt
[Thunderbolt General] jonah1234:
We r on the list for official cm9

Sent from my TeamBamfed ICS leaked ROM on my HTC Thunderbolt

Add me on google talk: jonahgoodman515
[Thunderbolt General] Tiezane:
It concerns me that they don't have us listed on their Devices page anymore, nor is there a forum for the Bolt. You can't even find it or Mecha mentioned on the downloads page.
[Thunderbolt General] plambda:
I think (could be wrong) a device needs a stable build to get a subforum on their site. For example, the Nexus 7 doesn't have a forum there either, but you can bet your ass it's getting official CM10 (as I'm running the nightlies on my N7 now). The TB is going to be tricky because it has never had any official CM build - someone from the team is going to have to sign up to be the maintainer, and start doing what is required to get nightlies going.

I still have my suspicions about getting official CM - I think more likely is you'll have a situation similar to gingerbread where slayher, workshed, and the others at least get an "unofficial" CM working, which is really as good as the "real thing" anyway. Either way someone is taking CM source and doing what's needed to make it run on the Bolt.
[Thunderbolt General] jonah1234:
I've always wondered what nightlies means

Sent from my TeamBamfed ICS leaked ROM on my HTC Thunderbolt

Add me on google talk: jonahgoodman515
[Thunderbolt General] rmkilc:
A new build each night! :p
[Thunderbolt General] mi7chy:
CM is our only hope for a clean, usable and stable ICS release for Thunderbolt. I've seen what CM did to my old, prior to Thunderbolt, Samsung Epic 4G and want the same experience for Thunderbolt.
[Thunderbolt General] jonah1234:
That's awesome but is it actually EVERY night?

Sent from my TeamBamfed ICS leaked ROM on my HTC Thunderbolt

Add me on google talk: jonahgoodman515
[Thunderbolt General] rmkilc:
For the most part, yes.
[Thunderbolt General] plambda:
Yes. Basically a "bot" compiles the most current code (all the changes that have been merged into the repository). There's often very few changes build to build, so one certainly doesn't have to flash every day.
[Thunderbolt General] jonah1234:
Does the eternity ROM still get nightlies

Sent from my TeamBamfed ICS leaked ROM on my HTC Thunderbolt

Add me on google talk: jonahgoodman515
[Thunderbolt General] plambda:
No idea. Ask the dev
[Thunderbolt General] androidsupra:
not every night like it was for a while, last "nightly" dropped on 8/4 Virus is working on a sense 4.0 port with the "goodies" the leak had, here's hoping it's better on battery than what the leak gave me
[Thunderbolt General] jonah1234:
Wow I'm excited for that now I love virus ROMs. How was the leak they sent u

Sent from my TeamBamfed ICS leaked ROM on my HTC Thunderbolt

Add me on google talk: jonahgoodman515
[Thunderbolt General] androidsupra:
we didn't get anything different from anyone else concerning the leak, we are patiently waiting for V to drop what he's working on
[Thunderbolt General] mvh11:
Why doesn't somebody take the CM9 source, use liquid's build information and get a basic CM9 build going? Will have the same issues as liquid ICS, but it would at least be a start.

I'd much rather see somebody do this with AOKP milestone 6(last ICS build, which should be easiest to get running), but beggars can't be choosers.
[Thunderbolt General] Tiezane:
I'm working on getting a system setup that I can play around on,I had things configured on my laptop, but the power cord went bad so I'm back to square 1.
[Thunderbolt General] taylormade629:
They said they were going to support the Thunderbolt. for cm9 may just have to wait for ril source to be released

Sent from my Liquid ICS Thunderbolt
[Thunderbolt General] street9009:
Hopefully it'll be soon! Wouldn't the leak of the HTC ICS give what's needed to get us to CM9 and CM10 (or at least CM9)?
[Thunderbolt General] disconnecktie:
Not exactly. The ics ril still has to be built for us to have proper data for aosp.
[Thunderbolt General] street9009:
But doesn't the leak help that a bit?
[Thunderbolt General] disconnecktie:
It may help some because of the ril but the aosp ril has to be made completely from scratch.
[Thunderbolt General] street9009:
Oh, so we're not really any closer to an official release at all then :(
[Thunderbolt General] METDeath:
Considering we're not even one of the officially supported phones on CM's website... I'd say... no.
[Thunderbolt General] androidsupra:
it doesn't have to be made from scratch, if it did they would have made it by now... I mean ics has been out for what, a year, the official ril has to be modified
[Thunderbolt General] disconnecktie:
You act like its easy to build an ril from scratch. Look at the gb ril. It still has issues with data and its been out for like 10 months. The ril is proprietary software that HTC doesn't have to release the source for. Without it it has to be coded completely from scratch.
[Thunderbolt General] androidsupra:
I never said it was easy, just stating the fact that they had to have the official ril before they got **** working, with the exception of liquid and jester, who still used parts from other phones rils for reference
[Thunderbolt General] disconnecktie:
You don't know what you're talking about. They got data working on ics without an official ril. The last time I checked we don't have official ics.
[Thunderbolt General] Tiezane:
See, I learn something new everyday. I thought the ril was just a pre-built file we would have to plug in. Thanks Disconnectie!

Sent from my Sega Master System using Carrier Pigeon.
[Thunderbolt General] androidsupra:
ok, so maybe you should go read jesters post with the general info about how they got it working, and I suppose the leak ril isn't official enough for you,
[Thunderbolt General] disconnecktie:
Not only is it different in aosp I think its in a different programming language also.
[Thunderbolt General] androidsupra:
read http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=30814145
[Thunderbolt General] sithdroid2187:
My question is, why does it change from version to version?
[Thunderbolt General] street9009:
It was confirmed in a Q&A with CM. Not supported in 7, going to be in 9. Now that ICS is out for it I would assume that helps.

I'd post a link but the board is preventing me since I'm a newbie.
[Thunderbolt General] disconnecktie:
This is true. They actually had a flowchart out that showed the direction they were going with the thunderbolt. Having ics will help but its just not the end all solution we need.
[Thunderbolt General] bradg24:
4g wasn't supported as well on cm7 as it is on cm9. Ics is the totally different ballpark compare to gb..
[Thunderbolt General] street9009:
Shoot mine rolls. I love it. I tested my 4G next to an unrooted Thunderbolt (with the Speedtest app) and they were identical. I love CM 7.1.1.
[Thunderbolt General] Chaztera:
Smooth as silk. Cm 7.1 and 4g is smokin' on mine.
[Thunderbolt General] quickdraw86:
Well, our CM7, and all of our AOSP roms, utilize an RIL hacked to work by slayher. The difference in our CM and AOSP ICS will be that the RIL will be included in the source for our ICS when it's published, unlike gingerbread.
[Thunderbolt General] street9009:
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/first-aosp-ics-for-thunderbolt-with-working-data-released/

Looks like we now have ICS! I wonder how long now before CM9 is official for us...
[Thunderbolt General] disconnecktie:
Probably won't be for another three months or so after we get official source for ics so cm can make a kernel.
[Thunderbolt General] street9009:
Wow that long huh? I would've thought much sooner, but admittedly I have no idea the effort it takes to make custom ROMs.
[Asus Transformer TF700] MrTonyToca:
Hey Everyone, I'm coming from a Asus Transformer tf300 , and my device was rooted, and didn't have bootloader unlocked....when receiving the OTA for Jelly Bean, I was under the impression that Using Voodoo OTA Rootkeeper would make everything smooth and dandy to take the OTA and still be rooted by restoring at after the update.... Well Voodoo OTA Rootkeeper worked but only half way, and what I mean by that is that the device was rooted but root permission was not given so it was pretty much no point in being rooted, and some say it was because an app called Supersu was not installed prior to the update and when the back up was made, so that app + Superuser had to be present and some people obtained their full root that way....But my point for this thread is to figure out before hand what methods we will take on the tf700 so that many wont be stuck without root when it happens.....I never was able to get full root or unroot or do anything, I ended up selling my tf300 and now have a tf700 so just taking precautions cuz I would love Jelly Bean on here but also would love root...... any suggestions? :cowboy:
[Asus Transformer TF700] Jotokun:
I think the best way to prepare for Jellybean is to let some others do it first and see how it goes for them. Maybe we'll be fine, maybe we'll need the supersu trick, maybe we'll need something else entirely. At this point, we simply cant say. As such, better to be cautious.

I've been reading some of the 300 threads on the JB update, and it looks like some people are having issues with their custom recoveries as well. Until there's a full understanding of the consequences of updating, I think those who are on anything other than unrooted locked stock should hold off unless they want to play guinea pig.
[Asus Transformer TF700] swa2k4:
The update will likely be posted as a cwm flashable ROM very shortly before or after it is available via ota dont worry you can find it here!
[Asus Transformer TF700] MrTonyToca:
What do you think is more feasible? Stay stock and not root and wait for jelly bean and update to it, then see if a way to root is found for jelly bean? Or root now, and hope there is a way found to carry that root on to Jelly bean eventually? Cuz I know the jelly bean update was very sneaky on the tf300, I didnt even know it was updating until it was already downloaded and ready to be installed, and it only asks a few times before automatically installing it.....so risks are involved in both.....hhmmmmmmm :confused:
[Asus Transformer TF700] graffixnyc:
I would say root now, use OTA rootkeeper to protect root and that way when you get the JB OTA you can just use OTA rootkeeper to restore root.
[Asus Transformer TF700] graffixnyc:
That's well and good for people who are unlocked, but not for people who are locked and just rooted. I dont see a need to really unlock at this point. I will unlock it when I start deving for it in a few days though :P
[Asus Transformer TF700] Alitheia:
I'm rooted but not unlocked. I'll be using the SuperSU trick to confirm that it works for us. I don't plan on any unlocking until I'm safely updated.
[Asus Transformer TF700] MrTonyToca:
Let us know if it works.....There was a way to fix the root permissions that they were sayin in the tf300 forum, but it involved alot of adb shell commands and pushing files, and me not being familiar with adb attempted it but wasn't able to execute all the commands, so even if it doesn't work there would be hope! (for people who are good with adb any way) :highfive:
[Asus Transformer TF700] ooonimrodooo:
So being rooted and unlocked, I will probably have to wait until someone creates a Rom from the jelly bean ota correct?

Sent from EVO LTE using the XDA app
[Asus Transformer TF700] Diogenes5:
Yes, you need SU and Voodoo working in conjunction after a root to maintain it. I rooted but didn't unlock because the rom scene isn't developed yet. I will be updating to JB as soon as possible and voodoo will hopefully preserve my root (It always did on my tf300 and on my htc amaze).

Any reason to believe it would not?