yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Kundal:
Home again...

Here are my mounts, fstab, recovery.fstab and last_log files (deleted some lines from the last one because it contains the restore log from my own CWM). Especially the mounts file looks different because of the AKURO data2sd method.

I didn't try the newest version 1.2.2 until now but will do tonight.

Edit: I saw now you deleted links for the version later than 1.2

Would it be useful to provide a last_log file containing the restore log from version 1.2 failing to restore my sd-ext properly?
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Deadly:
@kundal.. u mean 1.2.3?

hit thanks button! If above post helps you..
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] boooggy:
yeah 1.2.3 is still available.
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Kundal:
Found it, thanks. It wasn't on the first page. Yeah, something to play with...will report soon.
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Kundal:
Version 1.2.3:

- boot => yes

- freq, gov, sched => working, same little issue with SetCPU

- CWM => starting with error messages as before

- backup => working

- restore => again "Error while formatting sd-ext" and sd-ext wiped.

- restore backup created by v1.2.3 with my own CWM => working fine

I saved 2 last_log files after backup and after restore with v1.2.3
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] savie:
@kundal: ur fstab n recovery.fstab is similiar with mine.. yupz different in mounts coz u use akuro..

Try to update in few minutes.. :)

Update

savieDUOS-1.2.4 --> need tester

Try to fix cwm integrated and hope booting now

Common user recomended use savieDUOS-1.0 and savieDUOS-1.1 kernel

Regard

-savie@xda-
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Deadly:
@savie.. weird problem... not able to flash another kernel through cwm.. this is what I did..

Used your kernel till now 1.2.3.. approximately 13 hours I think..

And stable..

Anyway.. what happened is I tried to make backup from temporary cwm.. but it gave same error.. then I tried flashing kernel with both your integrated cwm and temporary one.. but it doesn't show any error but no changes.. tried mine1.2.3, yours 1.2.4, manoranjan's 1.3.2.. and one other which I can't tell hereas its not released yet.. but I think you got whos it is..

So I need to backup.. as I want to test rom now..

I will try with Odin.. may be its.not happening because still recovery from your kernel is running?

hit thanks button! If above post helps you..
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] savie:
@nitu

Make sure mount /system before installing zip file via cwm..

U can install cwm temporary with this kernel..

Backup-recovery problem is causes partition.. For ver-1.2.3 use ext3 in 2nd partition i thinks its more safe tham ext2/4..

-edit- kernel maybe.. lol..
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Deadly:
oh.. well i guess that must have been the problem.. sorry i forgot that!.. anyway odin had the guts to remove your kernel.. ;) :p

well now let me check 1.2.4...
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Kundal:
Nothing new with v1.2.4 from my side. I'm still getting "Error while formatting sd-ext"
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] boooggy:
1.2.4

No errors while loading

Create backup works now

Restore backup failed: error while flahing boot something.
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] savie:
i know it something bad in formating sd-ext partition.. maybe ive forget something.. :( this need more time.. so my suggestion is use advance restore and dont choose sd-ext so ur file in sd-ext is safe and not formating.. :)

Thanks guys for ur report and support..
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Kundal:
You could also flash the good old temporary CWM to restore without sd-ext / boot or try my CWM version which restores sd-ext and boot backups created with savies kernel fine for me.

However, my CWM might only work with AKURO or other methods mounting sd-ext to /system/sd (and probably /sd-ext). I didn't test that and can't guarantee you won't hardbrick your phone like the poor guy in the root/unroot thread. Unfortunately nobody seems to take the risk trying this version after his report.

I'll stay with version 1.2.4 and my CWM because everything except restore is working fine on my device until now.

Keep up your great work savie. I'm sure you'll cast that devil out.:good:
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] savie:
Lol.. Bootlove is good for ur health..

Try to figures out.. and u know what.. this mean my sgy cant restore sd-ext too but seem no one mention bout it.. maybe after sgy user read this they will change his kernel.. lol.. :p

Fixing my sgy kernel first than duos kernel.. :)
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] boooggy:
Well

If i load skins1980 cwm (which is for sgy), restore works fine. So.... Maybe some files are not loading properly.
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] savie:
Update with Ver-1.2.5 in 1st post..

Nothing much different only try to fix issue from nandroid restore via cwm.. :)

Regard

savie@xda
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] boooggy:
1.2.5

same err with restore backup: error while flashing boot image.
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] savie:
Mmm.. weird.. but anyways thanks for report but can u give last_log and mounts file.. :)

And how the result if use advance restore?? Only restore system, data, cache, or sd-ext??
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] boooggy:
here are those files.

didnt try the advanced yet but will go for it.
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] savie:
I thing im wrong to put file :(

Sorry.. uploading again..

http://db.tt/anp3XT9g

Sorry to screw up.. :)
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Kundal:
Nothing changed for me. Tried 1.2.5 and found 1.2.6 when I wanted to report.

Tried to restore a working backup with 1.2.6 and got the same result as before: CWM starts with errors, Error while formatting sd-ext and sd-ext wiped.
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] MNgez:
I think it's all about cwm that mr. Savie use in the kernel. I've use this version before this actually. But it couldn't do better than cwm-try by milan.sis. so i think Savie should rework the cwm or change it into diverent version. So it don't touch sd-ext but it can back up and restore well. Also can restore boot.img well too.

May Allah Bless U All...

Dikirim Ti GT-S6102 Kuring Nganggo Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] savie:
Ok bro.. Remove sd-ext backup more better than i push my self to fix it.. :p

Btw this trick working in my sgy so im confuse why its not working to duos.. :(

Thats why im update duos kernel and not for sgy for this time but no luck.. :p

Guys which version that contain this :

fstab:

/dev/block/stl9/system ext4 rw
/dev/block/stl10/cache ext4 rw
/dev/block/stl11/data ext4 rw
/dev/block/mmcblk0p1/sdcard vfat rw
/dev/block/mmcblk0p2/sd-ext auto rw

recovery.fstab:

# mount fstype device [device2] [fstype2] [fsoptions] [fsoptions2]

/boot bml boot
/system ext4 /dev/block/stl9 NULL rfs NULLrw,check=no
/cache ext4 /dev/block/stl10 NULL rfs NULL rw,nosuid,nodev,check=no
/data ext4 /dev/block/stl11 NULL rfs NULL rw,nosuid,nodev,check=no
/sdcard vfat /dev/block/mmcblk0p1
/sd-ext auto /dev/block/mmcblk0p2

If there isnt so something wrong with me... sorry guys... :)

Done.. 1.2.6 reporting working.. thanks kundal..
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Kundal:
Version 1.2.6 is working for me!

When I flashed it the first time something went wrong. I now flashed it again (don't forget to mount /system manually before flashing) and CWM came up without errors and restored my sd-ext properly.

Congratulations, savie you've done it!
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] boooggy:
1.2.6 not working for me

when i restore the back up created with 1.2.6 i get this:

checking md5 sums

erasing boot before restore...

restoring boot image...

error while flashing boot image!

i get this no matter if i mount system or not before this restore operation.
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] savie:
@boogy:

Sorry mate i dont know why coz ur report gave diffferent error with kundal..

Maybe kundal can share why its happen coz its work for him.. :)
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Kundal:
I never had problems backing up/restoring boot.img.

@boooggy: When looking up your backup in /mnt/sdcard/clockworkmod/backup does boot.img have the correct size (must be exactly 5 MB)? Does the restore work correctly if you delete the boot.img from the backup?
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Deadly:
Its saying #3 in about section.. is it 1.2.6 only? Anyway I'm checking backup now

hit thanks button! If above post helps you..
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Kundal:
Yes, signature is still savie@buitenzorg #3
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Deadly:
@savie.. 1 suggestion.. dont change .version file friend.. it makes us hard to know which version.. if you really want to change it.. keep it to your current kernel version.. so it will get updated..

Report: seems backup is working fine.. one more thing is my second sdcard partition got backed up in name of sd-ext.. I never saw this happening before.. well I didn't check backup features in .4 and .5.. anyway..

Check the file size.. 5 files are from cwm I regularly use by millan.sis.. another us yours which has boot.img and sd-ext extra. Check data size.. it differs.. both taken simultaneously.. anyway will try restore now...

hit thanks button! If above post helps you..
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] boooggy:
I have 4 tar files and a md5 file.

Got to look inside archives for boot.img.

Also never had this prob if i load cwm manually (before installing permanent cwm).
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Deadly:
Congrats savie... sheer awesomeness... restore worked perfectly.. I want a favour from you.. can you please provide this version of CWM seperately? May be in millan.sis thread of cwm or your own thread.. because this can backup second partition..

@boogy.. did you mount system before backup? I mounted it for backup and didn't for restore.. or try one more time.. may be second time is a charm for you..

Also which 2 tar files are u missing?

hit thanks button! If above post helps you..
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] savie:
Sorry for being confusing..

All vers still in #3 and only small fix without compile new kernel thats why i add 1.2.x coz to make me not confuse too with my sgy kernel.. lol..

Focus in 1.2.x is cwm and cause its work so change with 1.3.x to focus in dualboot features..

Im working without duos phone so after im sure with my work then uploaded without test..

@nitu: millan.sis cwm not backup boot and sd-ext that why u cant restore with this kernel coz its give different structur.. for sd-ext.vfat thats mean ur 2nd partition in fat format not in ext.. never try that format partition and dont know is it success in restore with this kernel..
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Deadly:
Edit:

Oh OK.. sorry without compile I didn't read properly.. sorry!!

Deleted..

I didn't try to restore that versions backup with this kernel friend.. I just noticed difference in data.tar file.. but seems not a problem...

It is successfully restored by your own kernel's cwm.. so don't worry its fine.. and link2sd works fine with fat32(vfat)..

Can you please provide CWM of your modded version desperately as zip file..? because this would help mass no. Of people.. if possible please make sd-ext backup optional.. maybe like advanced backup? I don't know if its possible.. but I will be greatful to u if it is.. as my SD is only 2 gb with 300 MB gone for link2sd.. backup size will be high know so...

hit thanks button! If above post helps you..
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] savie:
Thanks guys for ur support..

Considering to build single cwm maybe if im wanna refreshing with kernel stuff.. :p
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] MNgez:
Wow Greath work Mr. Savie

Long time no see

I've reed it show so many update.

May Allah Bless U All...

Dikirim Ti GT-S6102 Kuring Nganggo Tapatalk2
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] EricCantona2653:
This kernel can undervolt??? Wow XD

Sent from my GT-S6102
[Galaxy Y Duos S6102 Android Development] Jonny:
Not GPL compliant, thread closed.
[Asus Transformer TF700] jtenniswood:
Just picked up the Poetic HardBack Protective Case for ASUS Transformer Pad Infinity TF700 (B008IEGT28) from amazon UK, really impressed with this case, very nice build quality and the design is very flexible if you want take your tablet out from time to time.

Considering its £15, it's a great deal.
[Asus Transformer TF700] raffstyle:
I just placed an order on ebay its for tf201, Most of people here saying that those case will fit the TF700.

I just hope that im not wasting $16.. ill post some Pictures when i got it.

Please post some pictures of your case and tf700 in it. THANKS!
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Pappe18:
I'm currently using Spazedog JB, and it works like a charm, but I noticed it isn't bundled with a fm radio application like the "good old" cm7 (gingerbrea) was. Any suggestion?
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] XeloOw:
FM radio is only available on cm7 and Sense rom

But you can download Spirit Radio,it's a paid app but i'm sure you can find it for free :D

Sent From My Awesome Nexus One *_*
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tommert38:
[APP] Spirit FM: Broadcom,Texas Instruments,Samsung Silicon Labs & Qualcomm FM chips.
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] XeloOw:
Oh didn't know it was free on xda :)

Sent From My Awesome Nexus One *_*
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Pappe18:
love you guys, thanks!!
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kieranread:
Hi all, Sorry if this is already been asked or in the wrong section, I have a nexus 7 and wanted M4V to play on it, Is there a way how? Thanks :)
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] devwithzachary:
Try VPlayer or VLC

And remember Google is your friend ;)
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] philippe734:
The video player MX Player can read a lot of format, include M4V, and it has hardware acceleration support.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] mitchellvii:
The upcoming release of the Microsoft Surface will offer a digitized pen. Both the RT and Pro versions can use the pen; however, Microsoft warns that only the Pro version has palm rejection and highly accurate pen input (similar in quality to our s-pen). I am guessing that the RT version will work with the pen just not very well. For those who have tried writing without palm rejection you know what a frustating experience it can be.

It is estimated that the Pro version will price around $900+ or competitive with ultrabooks.

So if pen input is high on your list of must-haves, the Surface will offer it but it will cost you if you seek an experience on par with the SGN10.1.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] mitchellvii:
Additionally it looks as is the Surface RT will have a comparable resolution to our SGN10.1. NO full HD. Also the Surface will be significantly heavier than our device.

There seems to be quite a debate about the price of the RT. As low as $200 (which I doubt) up to the $400 to $500 range.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] yumms:
One advantage Surface has is that every app made for RT will be a tablet app....unlike android where most apps are phone apps.

Who knows, by the time Surface comes out it'll probably have more tablet apps compared to android.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] demandarin:
Seriously doubt it. Android has more tablet apps than you think. It will take a while for them to build up the numbers android has.even then, more and more will be created for android.

I do want a MS Surface also though ;)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] mitchellvii:
Looks like the Pro is the only one worth having and it will be heavy (over 2 lbs) and expensive. The Pro is basically a touch screen ultrabook with a really small screen.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] BarryH_GEG:
And there in lies the problem with RT. It won't be able to run native Windows apps so the only content will be what app developers adapt for ARM. With the jury still out on the ARM version of Surface's success, I wouldn't expect to see a slew of adapted and original apps for it when it releases. If you think about it, WebOS on the HP TP was really cool, easy to use, and very intuitive for the non-technical. It failed because of lack of content. MS can (and I expect will) port their apps over to work on RT but does anyone want to rely on Windows Media Player and WMA and WMV files (again)?

This is from a MS SEC filing. There's a great deal of risk in both the launch of Surface and competing with their h/w partners at the same time.

We also offer vertically-integrated hardware and software products and services; however, our competitors have been in the market longer and in some cases have established significantly large user bases. Efforts to compete with the vertically integrated model will increase our cost of revenue and reduce our operating margins.

We derive substantial revenue from licenses of Windows operating systems on personal computers. The proliferation of alternative devices and form factors, in particular mobile devices such as smartphones and tablet computers, creates challenges from competing software platforms. These devices compete on multiple bases including price and the perceived utility of the device and its platform.

Even if many users view these devices as complementary to a personal computer, the prevalence of these devices may make it more difficult to attract applications developers to our platforms. In addition, our Surface devices will compete with products made by our OEM partners, which may affect their commitment to our platform.
​
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] mitchellvii:
To me it seems like RT will be too little and Pro will be too much. I mean why drop $1000 on a 10 inch screen with a crappy keyboard when you can buy a nice laptop for that? I dunno but can you imagine trying to use MS ACCESS on a 10 inch HD screen? You would go blind.

Right now im feeling pretty good about my SGN10.1
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] wingzero2085:
I would think MS Access on a 10 inch screen would make my head spin. I also think the 10" form factor is best suited to light to moderate productivity tasks along with consumption of media, communications, and presentation. Tasks like note-taking, email, basic document manipulation and that sort of thing seem to be the most well-suited for conversion from a full PC to something like a tablet -- information management stuff, really. For $1000, I'd buy an ultrabook and use my regular wacom drawing tablet with it if needed, rather than the Surface and it's almost-full-windows OS.

I just don't envision doing a lot of real work on a 10" tablet, no matter who makes it. I'm a web developer (and designer) among other things, and while I certainly have the tools at my disposal to write source code on my tablet, I think I'd go insane with a project of any real size. Screen real estate is the major factor, IMO: my PC is a dual monitor setup and I use every bit of both monitors when I work. The Note has gone a long way in the short time I've owned it to changing how much and what tasks I use my tablet for. I find myself reaching for it far more often than I ever reached for my OG Transformer (and the TF had a keyboard dock!)

The Note 10.1 lets me sketch out ideas, create rough designs, and take notes on a decent size screen (the Note 5.3 is just too small for my liking for this) -- basically every bit of the prep work that I do (and sometimes just notes to myself while I'm mid-project). It's part of my tool set now, but definitely not the end-all for productivity. I have absolutely zero interest in a windows tablet, even with a true MS Office on it. Windows tablets have long been (and sounds like they still will be, even with the surface) too expensive for what they do (or, in the case of the lower priced Surface tablet, doesn't do enough for the $$). $500 was perfect for me -- I get my media consumption device (I already have enough $$ invested in android apps and content) plus a work tool all rolled into one and for a price I'm completely happy with.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] rpmbnsf:
My only hesitation when buying my Note 10.1 was knowing the MS was coming out with pen enabled tablet in two months. I have always felt tablets from the start should have built in support for inking abilities, after all, what is the tablet replacing first and foremost - a note pad. I have been frustrated up until now about the options - using a large, hot running, full of vents for cooling, expensive windows tablet with short battery life (but very good inking with active digitized layer on the screen) or skip the inking altogether and use keyboard (Transformer Tablet). I decided to go the Transformer route with a purchase of a TF101 when they first came out, loved it (still do) but still wanted to be able to write on the tablet like a pad of paper (capactive stylus never have worked like a real wacom one). Now the Note is out and I did wind up buying it, love it a lot but just wish I could have the best of both worlds on this tablet - long battery life, light, real inking ability is all there but its missing some type of real MS office type of app including OneNote that takes advantage of inking.

If I knew MS Windows 8 RT would have the same capabilities as my Note 10.1 (Speed, batt life, real inking) along with fully implements MS office then I could see me wanting to get one. A bonus is also the keyboard, I know some scoff at their keyboard but I'm wishing we had something like that on our Note!
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] mitchellvii:
But thats just the point. Pen performance on the RT will be sketchy at best. No palm rejection? Fogetaboutit. You want pen with an HD screen on Surface? Youll pay ultrabook prices for a tiny 10 inch screen.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] freedomispopular:
Out of curiosity, where have you read that RT will have pen support? Every thing I've read so far is that it won't.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] mitchellvii:
I read in a review that it will but that it will basically suck. No palm rejection and not very accurate input. Probably no better than a rubber tipped stylus. But people can start to see why the SGN10.1 doesn't have an HD screen. It wouldn't work with the pen without a much more powerful CPU.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] iofthestorm:
Most likely if it has a pen at all it'll be passive, not active. It wouldn't make sense to build in a digitizer and then not bundle a pen. Which means it won't be any better than using your finger really.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] iZan23:
I Will wait until the Samsung Series 5 Hybrid Pc comes out. HD screen with keyboard and Wacom Pen input, and it also works as an Ultrabook... So much!

Enviado desde mi GT-I9300 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] rpmbnsf:
This would be my choice - the best of all types of inputs, you decide how you want to use it, keyboard, touch or digital ink. I did notice in this article http://www.zdnet.com/samsung-to-introduce-hybrid-windows-8-tablet-at-ifa-2012-7000003235/

They say the full version of windows 8 tablets will sell for "several hundred dollars" I was under the impression only the RT ARM version was "rumored" to be

starting

at $200 and the full on X86 tablets were start at over $500 - $600 at least, with higher end tablets expected to be much higher. Is this still the case?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] mitchellvii:
I have read that the Surface Pro will price comparable to an ultrabook since that is basically what it is with touch and a very small screen. My guess is around $900.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] nymviper1126:
I am pretty upset that this will be shown right after they release the Note 10.1. Hopefully it will be a while away, or not run as smooth. increased price shouldnt really be a problem, though the 11 inch does seem a bit wide...
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] mitchellvii:
It will be heavy and probably twice the price.