yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Motorola Droid RAZR] ahzhang452:
Just tried with lgcamera from market with the parameters you gave me, they came up with the message: "video record failed"
[Motorola Droid RAZR] gsmfaker:
Any news regarding the subject?
[Motorola Droid RAZR] clau_la2:
thanks my fried! this work soooooo goood!

you are doing anything bad.

please check this

open LG Camera put in video mode

Resolution

1280x720

codec

h.264

format

mpeg4

bitrate

10 to 15, with 20 o more dont work

audio freq

44100

bitrate

320000

i was recorded to much videos with this settings if you cant do work this check media profiles and buildprop line per line(only edited lines obviously jeje)
[Motorola Droid RAZR] spawns:
I think the author has move on to another device..

Sent Via XT910 con tapatalK2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] RhymeOrc:
I have noticed there are two popular zips to root a device, CWM-SuperSU and Superuser. They both apear to function the same way. Is one of these preferred? I have only ever used the Superuser files since I joined the Android team. Am I missing anything? Thanks.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ÜBER™:
SuperSU it gives super user permissions much faster.

Sent From My Toro+ via RED Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kyokeun1234:
Supersu is one that I prefer

Swyped on my Galaxy Nexus running AOKP nightly with Franco Kernel, overclocked to 1.4GHz
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] buzzcomp:
FYI, SuperSU comes from a well respected developer (Chainfire), and was created because Superuser has some major bugs that ChainsDD still hasn't fixed - such as su crashing if Android wasn't fully booted, etc.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 3rdstring:
SuperSU v0.94
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] woot_galaxy_nexus:
How can i switch superuser to supersu if superuser is built into my rom?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] buzzcomp:
Flash http://download.chainfire.eu/204/SuperSU/CWM-SuperSU-v0.94.zip in CWM
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] woot_galaxy_nexus:
cool, so does this remove superuser or do i have to do that manually?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] buzzcomp:
the .zip will remove Superuser and install SuperSU
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] woot_galaxy_nexus:
sweet, it worked great! thanks :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] RhymeOrc:
Thanks guys, looks like I will be flashing SuperSU v0.94 tonight.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Petrovski80:
Have been using superSU for a couple of weeks now instead of the old trusted superuser. Besides the fact it does seem to allow root access a bit faster, there really is little difference between the two.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] duzy.kucyk:
Superuser is open-source.

From the Superuser's github:

"Superuser should be open source. It's the gateway to root on your device. It must be open for independent security analysis. Obscurity (closed source) is not security."
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] NickZee10:
I've used SuperSU by Chains for a few years now on the various ROMS, and when MMuzzy switched over to Superuser, it was a simple transfer that hasn't affected anything really. I haven't noticed any differences besides (like everyone else is saying) it is a bit slower at allowing permissions.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] TheJH:
So, some simple kernel modules will probably work on all kernel versions, but vermagic restricts this. I built something to force modules into the kernel even if the kernel isn't compiled with support for forced module loading: https://github.com/thejh/punchmod

What do you think?
[General Questions and Answers] dakunesu:
hello, my friend came back into the house and handed me his phone, it looked like this.

http://db.tt/oi5Ts02U

http://db.tt/5llsCuf3

im not sure where the damage could be, he says nothing hit it, he just pulled it out and it happend.

any ideas?

stock gx2 though I doubt the ROM has anything to do with it
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] kench33:
How do I access my internal sd from recovery or anyhow for that matter. I'm on beans 8 and I downloaded twrp and it won't reboot my phone now. says /tmp/recovery.log was copied to sdcard/clockworkmod/recovery.log please open rom manager to report issue.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] kench33:
Any help?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] noingwhat:
What exactly are you trying to access on your SD?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] kench33:
The twrp update from rom manager. Ended up restoring my stock backup. I needed 6.0.1.0 not 6.0.1.2
[HTC One X] D3VICE:
I'm on Android Revolution and everything is working perfectly for me and I want to keep it this way, but I really need to test another ROM.

If I do a NANDROID backup right now, install the other ROM, and then restore, will EVERYTHING be restored to the point it is now?

Will I keep my applications, settings and everything?
[HTC One X] dragonesdenano:
Yes, everything , to use the Nandroid backup restore...Then u should copy and paste the boot.ING from sd/clockworkmod/backup/datebackup... And flash it again as we have s on. ;)

Enviado desde mi HTC One X
[LG Nitro HD] Brand New:
Hi comrades! I was wondering if I should sell my HTC Vivid (Development has stopped for good) and pick up a used nitro off ebay, or should I invest in a Atrix HD, Note, or One X?. I see you guys have some talented devs at work and the Nitro's hardware is pretty kickbutt. So I'm pretty tempted too! :D Thanks in advance btw!
[LG Nitro HD] mast3rvo:
I've had my nitro for about two months now. Its a decent phone (I came from Galaxy Vibrant) but the responsiveness of the screen is definitely not responsive enough for me. I'm on the official ICS also.

If you're into flashing a bunch of different roms then this phone might not be for you. There are only a handful of devs making/porting roms here. Not that they aren't doing great, I just like to have a ROM buffet :p . I ordered a Gnex which should arrive tomorrow due to its dev support.

If you can get past lack of support (compared to the vibrant anyways, I'm not bashing the devs here at all) and slightly less responsive touch screen then this phone is decent.

Soo my only gripes about the phone:

Not as much development compared to phones like gnex or vibrant

Touch isn't as responsive compared to my old vibrant

Battery life ain't the best (I'm on extended so that helps a lot)

Pros:

IPS display is great.

Speaker is loud.

Camera is nice

Small community so you recognize most people here

Hardware is nice

I hope that helped!
[LG Nitro HD] applebook:
Don't get any phone with a pentile display unless it is the Galaxy 3. My Optimus LTE screen is just as responsive as the Galaxy 2/ Infuse. They probably use the same tech.

At the going rate for unlocked Nitrous, it.is the best buy right now if you don't need quad core. There is plenty of promising dev support, and rooting is easy.
[LG Nitro HD] freakboy13:
Nitro is a decent phone. Im still deciding whether or not to go back to the amaze as a backup or keep the nitro.

The touch response is pretty slow, but maybe its more sensative to being covered up with a screen protector.

Its a pretty smooth phone seems to task pretty well. The camera... well i hatevto say it but its awful.

A real let down considering lg 's firsy true flagship had such a killer camera on it.

Could be just the software i dunno.

Battery although most people say it sucks seems normal which .... sucks.

The screen is awesome, really nice i think on par with the one x. And yeah if your going to go with sammy get the gs3 all the other screens including the note are just garbage, that is unless you prefer over saturated unatural colors.

Im actually waiting for the note2.

Rumor its going to have a better screen than gs3.

This is a nice every day or backup phone.

Is it a beast? Hardly.

But i will say this the lg skin is pretty close to aosp.

Dont pay more than 250- 300.

I got mine for 225.

:beer:
[LG Nitro HD] kernelpan1c:
Compared to any non-HD screen phone, the battery life will suck especially if you have a lot of screen on time. Standby time in CM9 or CM10 is excellent though.

After owning, developing for, and having hardware issues with my Nitro before, I can't recommend this phone unless your getting it on the cheap. The hardware issue I had was the microphone stopped working and people couldn't hear me. (It wasn't a ROM issue).

With that said, I have heard bad things from Galaxy Nexus owners as well, such as it overheats. I haven't had my Nitro overheat before but it certainly gets hot if your playing a game on it for an hour. LG needs to work on their quality though, I think many of us believed that the Nitro being a flagship phone at the time would be of higher quality but I really don't believe the manufacturing quality is up to that of Samsung or HTC.

I admit I am nitpicking considering I use this phone every day and it works well for everything I need.
[LG Nitro HD] Hutch89:
I got two for a penny each....pretty Damn happy with my purchase
[LG Nitro HD] 996gt2:
As others have said, unless you can get this phone for $50 or less on contract, don't bother. The development community is tiny, there is a huge lack of quality, stable ROMs, battery life is mediocre if you like to use the screen a lot, and the touchscreen isn't that responsive.

I'm getting rid of this phone and upgrading when my contract permits. I was really on the fence about upgrading to the Galaxy Nexus, but decided to keep the Nitro for the time being since it does have a really nice screen.
[LG Nitro HD] houstonsveryown:
Honestly. I would get something else. Screen is great. But that's about it. I would get the note because development is great. The one x is growing fast. But the Atrix HD is just getting started.

Depends on if you like an arsenal of roms to flash.
[LG Nitro HD] mast3rvo:
Just got the gnex..

It's amazing. Performance is great, ROM support is great and I love the customizable ness of it. I could change the onscreen buttons and all that.

The only things I miss from nitro HD is the screen and SD card but I can live without those. Nitro HD screen beats the gnex screen hands down but its not enough for me to stay with it.
[LG Nitro HD] scott0:
cool, glad that's settled, now we need to get a mod to delete this thread because I've been planning to sell my nitro for$250+ when the note 2 comes out shortly.
[LG Nitro HD] 996gt2:
Good luck with that, I've had my Nitro posted up for less than that and nobody was interested even after a month.
[LG Nitro HD] houstonsveryown:
same here ive had it on CL(Craiglist) For a week at $225-235 no interest what so ever. But i Dont wanna go under $200
[LG Nitro HD] scott0:
i was joking, i have no intentions of getting rid of my nitro any time soon, it does everything i need a phone to do just fine.
[LG Nitro HD] houstonsveryown:
Well im glad your faith in the device is strong!!!!!!!

Didn't wanna get rid of it till i had my One X. But i dumped that phone today for a quick $200
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] drwx:
Do any of the custom roms (besides cm10) have the mod to do vol rocker for changing music tracks? That's one of my favorite features of cm10, but i'm wanting to get it set up for my wife, who doesn't run cm10 (good as a daily driver for me... not so much for her).
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jasonblair:
Sorry for not posting in the development forum, but since I am a newbie, forum rules will not let me post there.

Possible issue - I installed the Flapjaxxx ICS IMM76D UCLF6 Base Build #4 rom, and still didn't have GPS, so I flashed the stock UCLA radio to get GPS functionality. I thought everything was perfect, but since then, my family has complained that my phone conversations sound garbled... If I shut off my Jawbone Icon and speak directly through the phone, they say it sounds great. But when I am using the Jawbone, they describe it as "being in a tunnel." My Jawbone is a couple of years old, so a friend said it could just be getting old and plugged with pocket lint... But the timing of the issue cropping up after rooting to this ROM is suspicious. Has anyone else had bluetooth problems? Thanks!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] zer0nine:
Good.

The only threads in the development sub-forum should be ROMs, mods, and radios anyway. If you have a question post in the Q&A section.
[Xperia Play Android Development] game_guy:
Does this have CDMA support yet? And I assume you'd like a logcat.
[Xperia Play Android Development] CosmicDan:
No, and no. Read the OP. It takes me a long time to upload.
[Xperia Play Android Development] game_guy:
Ah. My bad, didn't notice that sorry. >.<
[Xperia Play Android Development] cj360:
It does on pax's 7/29 build. You could use that as a base for the cdma variant as that has *almost everything working.
[Xperia Play Android Development] CosmicDan:
It's fine, just be patient.

Link please? Is it CM10?

Upload finished.
[Xperia Play Android Development] wmaster4g:
****yeah ;)

i'm go testing now

and will be translate russian later

this is port of that
[Xperia Play Android Development] CosmicDan:
No, this is my own work. If I got it from that guy I would have given credit to him.

EDIT: He probably used my own research. Unlike most XDA "developers", I like to share what I know with the community. Or maybe he is actually one of the few skilled hackers on here and also did it himself like me.
[Xperia Play Android Development] yukarundeng:
gonna try it later after work and will report the bugs

thanks for bringing up another JB Rom pal ;)
[Xperia Play Android Development] cj360:
Here it is and yes it's cm10.
[Xperia Play Android Development] Fat_boy555:
Good work!! Goinf to have it downloaded in a few hours.. Gotta sleep first.. One question.. Does the sd card mount properly?
[Xperia Play Android Development] CosmicDan:
Alright thanks, I'll try and build a CDMA test version. But since this isn't FXP I won't be able to keep it as up-to-date.

Sure, why wouldn't it? Unless you mean the CM10 bug where it says "Unable to install to internal USB or memory card" when you try to install paid apps from the Play Store, no. That is a CM10 bug. But restoring everything from TB works fine, and installing free apps/updates from Play Store works fine.
[Xperia Play Android Development] cj360:
Awesome, I know pax will update once he's able to and eventually fxp will figure out data as well.

Going kinda off-topic with this so let me know if you'd rather not discuss it here but, do you build your kernel with ics sources modified for JB or from fxp's jb sources?
[Xperia Play Android Development] CosmicDan:
The kernel I'm building from is branched off JBX repo (on the 'jellybean-turbo' branch), however I did a full tree comparison and the FXP CM10 jellybean kernel is identical to the JBX one - apart from the zRAM update from FXP (Google snappy compression) which I have already merged in CM9 turbo kernel. The RAMDisk is based on FXP RAMDisk.
[Xperia Play Android Development] paxChristos:
Computer's built, installing Ubuntu 12.04 soon so i'll be back in the game.

Cosmicdan, what does SEMCRIL look like in Framework?

Pax
[Xperia Play Android Development] CosmicDan:
The full SemcRIL code for this ROM is taken directly from CM10, along with BaseCommands and PhoneFactory. It was actually a requirement to get it booting. Using my existing scripts but replacing the CM10 base for CDMA version, and the MIUI base for the CDMA Galaxy Nexus version, it should hopefully be enough....

...I would upload my "kitchen" so people can try to build it and bugtest, but how many of you guys with CDMA zeus's are good with smali? :) Also it requires Windows Vista/7.
[Xperia Play Android Development] Leraeniesh:
Good to hear! Are there any working CDMA builds floating around, or should we wait for builds from you?
[Xperia Play Android Development] CosmicDan:
Of what? MIUI or CM10? Check the JBX thread for CM10 working CDMA. Wait, cj posted the link a few posts back to a CM10 for zeusc with working data.
[Xperia Play Android Development] paxChristos:
Sorry to hijack cosmic,

My guess as to why CM10 data stopped working for CDMA is because of a commit done a while back (August 5th)

Now that I have a working PC i'm gonna try to undo that & see if that's the issue & if it is, I need to coordinate with FXP to create a ril for cdma & edit some common files :P

Pax
[Xperia Play Android Development] CosmicDan:
That's fine, it's is still relevant since it's based on CM10. So is that build linked a while back working with CDMA fully or not? I will probably not update the GSM ROM of this until next FXP release anyway so.... yeah.

It would be good if FXP CM10 had CDMA working, because then I could easily create a patch for this GSM ROM. I really don't want to have to upload two full ROM's every time.
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] NoClemency:
I'm getting error 155 when I try to restore my phone with RUU. I thought I was running 1.22.651.3, but when I run the RUU, it says I'm running 1.13.651.1. I've tried both RUU's getting the same result. I have the drivers installed and I relocked my bootloader. And I have done this process before, but I've never gotten this error before. I'm currently running fresh-evo-lte-5.1.1 on my phone which may be causing the problem. I'm going to attempt to restore to default rom and retry it after I finish posting this, and I will let you know how that works. If anyone has any ideas or recommendations, please message me. Thanks.

Edit: I restored back to default rom and to 1.13.651.1 and no longer got the error. However, now I got a different error﻿ of error 140: Bootloader Version Error. Let me know if anyone has any suggestions? Thanks.

I restored back to default rom and to 1.13.651.1 and no longer got the error. However, now I got a different error﻿ of error 140: Bootloader Version Error. Let me know if anyone has any suggestions? Thanks.

I figured out my problem. I needed to restore back to default rom, then run RUU 1.22.651.3 and it worked. Hope this helps others.

HTC EVO LTE
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] rushmix:
We've all had our SGS's for a while now, and I was wondering how people are feeling on particular combinations of kernals and mods. I recently upgraded to ICS and I love the features, but I'm missing the good battery life I had with the Adrenaline Shot Gingerbread mod. So, given any combination of platform, kernal, undervolting levels, etc, what have you found makes for the longest battery life?
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] lonoguge:
I think the best ics rom is code name 2.0 in combination with the new hefe Kernel because of the battery life. If you like a lot of customization but want to keep a good battery life I recommend beam rom. (Battery life of beam is actually almost on par with code name) But I happen to look for apps to customize rather than within the rom so I use apex beta for the jelly bean looks and gestures rather than the cm9 themes for instance with codename and it doesn't take a toll on battery. The other thing to point out tho is the on screen issue. Code name is great for battery when its on standby mode (screen is in sleep mode) but like any other rom in ics or gb its pretty lousy when the screen is actually on so that's where apps like screen dimmer come in handy because they dim the screen beyond factory limit and save battery even during when the screen is on. Also remember to calibrate any rom and let it drain then recharge it all the way and bla bla bla if you don't know these steps you can look it up in the q&a forums.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] rushmix:
I'm honestly surprised that an ICS mod could get more performance than a GB mod. I shall try your combo!
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] eollie:
You do know googles top dev has said calibrating the battery is something that is a urban android myth dont you?

OP really any of the ICS flavors with hefe kernel added will be good.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Beastmode:
Android already has urban myths? Too awesome! Lol

----------------------------------------------

If helped don't be afraid to hit the thanks button ;) it doesn't bite lol
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] lonoguge:
No I don't think so, from personal use I know that some Roms have 70% before rebooting the phone but once I restart it, i notice it drains to 30% or less. This usually happens on a newly flashed rom. Calibration fixes this issue for me at least.

---------- Post added at 12:09 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:01 AM ----------

Sorry i thought you meant on ics specifically. Battery life wise valhalla black by far is the best for battery it could probably last 3 days on one charge. Im not sure if theres a better froyo rom but it would make sense. The hefe kernel would be the best for gb or ics
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Beastmode:
Isn't hefe kernel just ICS?

----------------------------------------------

If helped don't be afraid to hit the thanks button ;) it doesn't bite lol
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] lumin30:
Sure is. That's why people need to check who they get their advice from.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jigglynuts:
Battery life is better than it has been on any ics so far. Using AOKP and hefe kernel. OC to 1.3.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] hechoen:
Can I be on the approved advice giver list? If so here's some advice. Everyone has their own idea of what the best combo is for them. All of these best threads are kinda useless. It's like asking 100 guys who the hottest looking actress or model is. Your gonna get at least 50 different responses. Just try different ROM/kernel combos for a few days each and see what one best suites your needs.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] eollie:
What you are seeing is not calibrating the battery. You are deleting the battery stat file. All that does is start over with no stats in the file. Draining a lithium ion battery to a dead state decreases the life of the battery more then it will help it.

https://plus.google.com/105051985738280261832/posts/FV3LVtdVxPT
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] lonoguge:
Oopsies
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] rushmix:
Well, this is a forums where we discuss things. So I figured I'd ask people what they like!

Anyone have an opinion on Gingerbread mod/kernel combo's? I'm trying to use a Sony MN800 with my phone (for motorcycle riding) and ICS apparently has problems with the MN800 bluetooth functionality.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] adobrakic:
The hottest-looking actress really isn't that far off as an analogy. You may assume that each of our phones act similarly, compared to other SGS4Gs using the same software, but that simply isn't true. There have been plenty of cases here that I've seen where the majority of users couldn't replicate an issue a certain user or users have experienced, which typically means that the discrepancy is in the hardware. Statistically, you should be fine, but you should also take advice with a grain of salt.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] rushmix:
I guess expediency is the name of the game for me here, to be honest. I don't have days and days to try out the best combinations, as I am leaving for a weekend trip in a couple of days. I wanted to see what people have had amazing success with, so that I may stand a chance of having my phone be my motorcycle music player all weekend :).

I've just set the governor to Smartass V2 in Codename 2.0 + Hefe, as I've heard that's a good one for battery life. What about battery voltage adjustments?
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] eollie:
I think its safe to say -50 on each level should be safe. Not sure what kind of bike you have but maybe a hidden power outlet and a charger cord tucked away.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] lumin30:
For anybody that has tried AntonX's Barebones - I believe would tell you that is your best bet to play it safe. I use it one of my phones with LightningZap with great results... it is my 'safe' phone when I need everything to work properly.

Hechoen - I'd take your advice any day.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] rushmix:
Thanks for the input! However, I'm not quite sure what -50 on each level means for Codename 2.0. The interface in Codename 2.0 is a voltage slider that starts at the default of zero and increases (to seemingly huge numbers). I don't see a way to gauge what the real voltage levels are and whatnot, so as to set lower levels.