yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III General] ShironLive:
If samsung comes out with a phone looking like the one on that picture, hell would break loose, and apple would sue the **** out of Samsung
[Galaxy S III General] Whistler_QD:
Sure, that would be really bad... Technological progress is pure evil.

When you buy a car you obviously want it to have 200hp instead of 300hp.
[Galaxy S III General] ustrucx:
Now thats a design I would buy! Too bad the law in some countries is so fragile to a point one could put a patent on a bitten apple.
[Galaxy S III General] matttye:
Hardly any software written for Android takes advantage of four cores at the moment..what's the point in having six?
[Galaxy S III General] nodstuff:
That isn't technological progress, if they use a 6 core cortex a-9 they are idiots because a-15's could do the same with 4 cores and if they have 6 core a-15 that is just absolute overkill and not necessary in a phone.

Your car analogy looks like it makes sense but it doesn't.

Would you take an 80bhp engine out of a fiesta and put in a 1001bhp engine from a Bugatti veyron, would that make it a better car?

By your logic it would be way better, in fact we should all be disappointed that fiestas don't have veyron engines in them.

Horses for courses.
[Galaxy S III General] prking07:
Ill take the fiesta with 1001bhp!!! I would destroy everybody in street drag racing!:D
[Galaxy S III General] matttye:
It's overkill now, buy maybe not one day.

I also think that 2GB RAM is overkill in an Android phone, but they did it anyway. People are spec whores unfortunately, people will want higher megapixel counts even when it's detrimental to quality.

Sad world we live in!
[Galaxy S III General] meniak:
I think you would destroy the front of the Fiesta rather than everybody to be honest...
[Galaxy S III General] irzero:
If you knew anything at all about processors you would realise how useless 6 cores are let alone 4. A fast dual core is more use since nothing had 6 threads
[Galaxy S III General] DeadSOL:
I'll tell you what; enjoy your S3!!! People will start a new thread on any topic these days.
[Galaxy S III General] SlimJ87D:
Guys this is VERY FAKE AND UNREALISTIC. Look at the bezel, there's no way it is going to be that thin. Come on don't be so gullible.
[Galaxy S III General] Amritttt:
Lol its tooo early dont expect anything before april 2013
[Galaxy S III General] bortak:
..... "Wipe to unlock" LOL xD
[Galaxy S III General] zodiaxe66:
Yeah its a new feature.every time u unlock the screen the phone get wiped of all apps and data therefor u only need 50mb ram and play store will be obsolete.now that's a smart phone...
[Galaxy S III General] phunkycow:
Yes, the S4 will be shipped with a small cloth. You take it out of your pocket, wipe the screen from all the prints and then it unlocks. :p
[Galaxy S III General] kulisap:
Definitely will. I read a15 processors have higher IPS even clocked at lower freq compared to a9 processors. I will get that duad/quad s4 with a15 rather than that with six core a9.

And i heared staight from an engineer of touch screen manufacturer of s4 that it has a feature enough for him to trade the next iP5. :D and he's an iphone maniac :D
[Galaxy S III General] metroplis:
flippable monitor 3.5 <> 7 inch

5600 mAh battery

6 to 8 core processor with dual core gpu

2 gb ram with 64gb internal memory

waterproof / Electromagnetic*pulse proof...

stronger than nokia 3310...
[Galaxy S III General] nodstuff:
Dual core GPU?

The nexus 7 GPU has 12 cores....

I think the fact you want a dual core GPU says a lot about your other suggestions..... :rolleyes:

Edit: I'm going to bite my tongue and not say anything about your absolutely absurd suggestion of 6 to 8 core CPU, it is especially silly if you actually read the comments before yours talking about how stupid an idea having that many cores is.

Oops, I inadvertently did what I set out not to do, oh well.
[Galaxy S III General] Jack Barrett:
That's so fake.
[Galaxy S III General] Geordie Lad:
You could stick a deca-core CPU in a phone but still wouldn't be that much faster than the S3 because Android isn't even close to optimising the S3s 4 cores yet.
[Galaxy S III General] eXecuter.bin:
Those pictures looks like all other generic fake renders. You have to be an utter tool if you actually thought the article is remotely real.
[Galaxy S III General] Warhero141:
Who needs 6 cores when you'd get a quantum processor.
[Galaxy S III General] dazznuts2000:
Haha like there going to have design pictures and specs on s4 when s3 has just released and six cores? Who knows what processors we will have out this time next year, look at how far we have come so far this year
[Galaxy S III General] tolis626:
Even though I think he's joking,only the fact that he wants a phone stronger than the Nokia 3310 is pure insanity.He should be shot in the head.I remember my father once had a Nokia 3310.I also remember one day when he threw the phone to the wall.The wall didn't make it... :crying: :eek:

Anyway,on a more serious note now.I remember about 2 years ago,a guy here at XDA asked for a phone with a dual-core 1.5GHz CPU,1GB of RAM,720p 4.5" screen and stuff like that.Everyone called him crazy and said that anything more powerful than the HD2 was overkill.Look what we have now and guess what we'll be talking about in 2 years from this day. ;)
[Galaxy S III General] nodstuff:
Well there will be no need for a 6 to 8 core CPU, the dual core 5 series exynos with Mali t604 GPU is more powerful than the 4412 in the s3, the next gen of processors have way better performance and efficiency and even if they want to have the specs looking good the furthest they will go is a quad 5 series exynos.
[Galaxy S III General] SlimJ87D:
LOL I think he met SLi gpus in a SoC...
[Galaxy S III General] nodstuff:
Well if that's what he meant then that's a different story but I don't think that's what he meant.
[Galaxy S III General] tolis626:
I wasn't trying to defend him.6,let alone 8,cores are way too much.Not even desktop PCs need 8 cores on a daily basis,unless you're a hardcore gamer that likes to listen to music,while converting a movie file,while downloading stuff.You know,not a very normal person. :p

Anyway,I just wanted to say that you don't know what's gonna come.I'm pretty sure that we'll look at today's SoC's and laugh.GPUs do have a longer way to go than the CPUs until they reach a point where more power isn't needed.Also RAM and bandwidth can and will be better.We'll see...
[Galaxy S III General] sohebq:
I will not think of s4 for another 6 months at least, this is the time to enjoy s3. With the start of 2013, we can make such threads where we can discuss anything. Whatever shape or specs it is, now i trust samsung and I know they will not disappoint users :)
[Galaxy S III General] Szadzik:
150% fake.
[Galaxy S III General] Arsaw:
It is fake for sure. But I do like the designed. :)
[Galaxy S III General] Veilshatter:
That looks just terrible......... I'm tickled its fake
[Galaxy S III General] Svendrae:
this Photo is the same which was postet for the s3 before it come out.
[Galaxy S III General] sak500:
looks like a bast**d child of apple and samsung. Six cores are not even being fully used in PCs and only for hard core gaming and DTP/Graphic designing which would be useless on 4~5 inch screens.
[Galaxy S III General] Alejandrissimo:
tow cameras in that position will NEVER capture an image in 3D in landscape mode (normal camera position) since the image will be the same. So that render its totally stupid hahahaha
[Galaxy S III General] furt890:
I would rather have a better battery life accompanied with more efficient and powerful quad core chip.
[Galaxy S III General] loney01843:
I'm not getting one unless it has core i7, 8gb ram and dual gpus. Oh yeah and it needs to be tougher than Chuck Norris.

Chuck Norris is so tough he can block the toilet just by pissing :cool:
[Galaxy S III General] LemonPlusTea:
6 cores?

I'll be glad with the current 4 with Nokia indestructibility... :laugh:
[Galaxy S III General] Conflict94:
correct me if im wrong but isnt this picture the supposedly leaked photo for the galaxy note 2?

i wouldnt trust these website rumours, we wont even know the state of technology then when the s4 comes out!

i think its time for samsung to do more improvements to the software rather than hardware. The current hardware packing with the s3 can definitely last a long time!
[Galaxy S III General] tolis626:
I agree with you about the software part.They have more than enough room for improvement.I will disagree,however,about the hardware of the S3 being enough.It's not.It may be getting the job done alright,but a quad-core(or even dual-core) A15 CPU(NOT the Krait of the S4) would give us far more performance while being even more energy efficient.Couple that with a lower die size and we can have a CPU that easily puts the Exynos 4412 to shame.Not to mention the GPU.The Mali MP400 may be powerful and all,but:

i)It's an old architecture and is flawed.When polygon count skyrockets,performance goes bye-bye.And modern games tend to have high polygon counts.

ii)It's not OpenGL ES 3.0 compliant and that says it all.

iii)The new Mali T6xx series,the Adreno 3xx and the PowerVR series 6 GPUs are far more powerful and more energy efficient than the MP400,which will soon be considered low end.

Some/most of you will argue we don't need that kind of power.Well,we don't as things are right now.But if we do have that power available,we'll start seeing the benefits.I'm not saying that companies and developers will wake up one day and think about us.They make money by giving us better software that exploits all that power.More power under the same or a lower energy envelope is definitely the way to go.People just need to accept it.
[Galaxy S III General] irzero:
All I want is a HD super amoled plus 330 ppi screen and a dual core A15 and I'm happy.
[Galaxy S III General] Steve_max:
Hopefully, the next Galaxy S-series phone will have more RAM (1GB on the S3 is in the low end, this TouchWiz UX hits RAM hard), a quad-core A15 CPU (the Exynos 5250 is a monster, but there's no way they'll go from quad to dual core. Expect a 5450 soon), with a T624 GPU and (hopefully) a non-Pentile SAMOLED+ HD screen. I'd prefer a smaller screen, but that's not going to happen. If they keep the screen at the same size (also not going to happen) and change to an A15, the battery life should increase even with the same battery.

But yes, the big improvements will come in software. This was already the case with the S3 (with the improved motion gestures, things like smart stay, and the whole "designed for humans" theme), the S4 should have even more of it. Touchwiz is a good interface, except for the icons and the lack of flexibility; they will add more software features, hopefully ones that you can actually use daily.

Now, 6-core CPU? Dual-core GPU?! What's this guy smoking? :silly:
[Galaxy S III General] The Letter M:
I just got my s3 I don't want to hear about something new is coming out. I need jelly bean 1st.
[Galaxy S III General] SirCanealot:
Exactly. Why wouldn't we want that power? I'd rather have a much more powerful chip set that I rarely need to max out. More than often this is much better for battery. And the more ram the better. Sure, 1 gig is fine, but not for a high end phone. More ram would make battery, multitasking and general performance much better :)
[Galaxy S III General] disclaimernotice:
That may be true from a tech point of view, but considering how flagships always rely a lot on marketing and gimmicks, rather than just specs, I highly doubt next year's flagship smartphones will go back to being dual cored, even if the dual core is actually better than the quad core. Because marketing wise, "next gen dual core" is not as impressive as "latest quad core".
[Galaxy S III General] screwjack:
Well the picture and specs look like a product of somebody's not so rich imagination and has nothing to do with reality.

Besides, 6 cores in the phone? Come on, I hardly see any need of six cores in desktop PC. And as it was mentioned already, number of cores are not that improtant when it comes to performance, especially if there is no software to utilize them.

From a user's perspective all that should matter is the experience device delivers and not number of cores, Hzs, MBs and all the other measures.
[Galaxy S III General] skytcam:
this is fake i saw these pictures saying it was going to be the s3 at the start of the year lol
[Galaxy S III General] matttye:
And also when software actually takes advantage of all four cores, an old, less efficient quad core processor could still beat a newer, more efficient dual core.
[Galaxy S III General] tolis626:
Oh,I don't think anyone has already mentioned this,but storage should be larger than what today's phones have.64gb sounds really good.I mean,32gb plus a 32gb SD card is ok,but we're gonna need more.Let's face it,cloud services are a no-go in many situations.Plus they are never going to be nearly as fast as native storage.And an SD slot can't be left out.Period.
[Galaxy S III General] hitek86:
that thing just looks like a court case with apple. no way it would ever be real.

the 2 cameras on the back looks interesting tho. 3d filming would be sweet!!
[Galaxy S III General] Jaytronics:
I must say, who are we to say what will or will not be "needed" we are not the final say as to what Google and the manufacturers have planned for the next several up coming iterations of hard and software. Granted, we have some ideas as to what is coming down the line. But truly we know not. Do I believe that that specific phone is on the near horizon? No, not particularly. But again, we dont truly know. The whole industry as a whole could pullnout a quantum leap of a trick and utterly surprise us all. Most likely not, seeing as most business people are extremely up tigh, boring and well, woukd milk the cow for as long as possible. Apple is not the only one who does it. They just milk the cash cow better than anyone at the moment. But, that is because most, but not all of there fan boys are some how memorized at them. Though I tend to lean towards it beingba form of hipster cultural thing than being a technological thing. Most of them could not tell you the difference between RAM or the processor. Or even possibly the screen. Love l! Dont get me wrong, I know we over here on the green side of the fence have our share of the uninformed. But, it is a tad bit different. Here you should remember this. Lol!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FL7yD-0pqZg&feature=youtube_gdata_player
[Galaxy S III General] leonbarroso:
No

The tendency now is have more efficient processors

not 6 our 8 cores

but better performance per core

because there is the battery limitation

and you dont need superfast phones, superperformance goes to tablets or PC
[Galaxy S III General] anthonys2r:
How about we focus less on CPU technology on more on battery tech..
[Galaxy S III General] sxi200:
The S4 is so next year. What we really need is an S5 thread.

Hopefully the S5 has holographic capabilities. I'd love a virtual stripper.
[Galaxy S III General] disclaimernotice:
But as usual, apple would sue them for that. No, not for using holograms, but for infringing patent 8011648193618 which gives apple intellectual property over "watching apparel removal on a rectangular device"
[Galaxy S III General] Knowpig:
Apple already applied for a hydrogen fuel cell battery patent.

Not good for my team. :(

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S III General] Szadzik:
Apple should patent suing others for infringing patents, so no one can sue them ;)
[Galaxy S III General] ghatothkach:
hi

For 6+ cores, they should make the back side of metal, and patent it as a surface to fry an omlette, so Apple cant sue them..

I really dont care if the design is plastic or metal, as I have to put a otterbox case over it anyways..., hopefully they design it so that

it fits better in a case...

Next its high time they make MHL docks now...

hopefully they get a high ppi, low power sunlight visible display in the S4, which can boost its battery life, and of course we do want a bigger

and lighter battery.

and they should really git rid of the physical home button, and make it more like the nexus with software buttons.

I am pretty happy with my S2, so no S3 but yes to S4...
[Galaxy S III General] Ausboy 2011:
Yuck no software buttons lol
[Galaxy S III General] uf21:
Now that is a nice looking phone.
[Galaxy S III General] IamIrene:
so weird

and maybe remain quad core

but is using cortex a15
[Galaxy S III General] Tectas:
Ahh, i don't like the software buttons of i.e. the nexus, they're just eating up screen, I would be more than happy if they would replace the physical home button with a capacitive home button.
[Galaxy S III General] theq86:
if it's going to have sms2toast I'll buy for sure
[Galaxy S III General] fergusstrachan:
MEGA lol!

"Wipe screen to unlock"

And you want me to think this is real.... tsk tsk. ;)
[Galaxy S III General] Saenic:
To ppl that say u dont need more cores because apps dont use it: Android is multithreaded and runs apps simultanously. More cores means faster app switches
[Galaxy S III General] Tectas:
That's true, but in most common only useable related to services. Background apps are more or less in a sleep state and (at least shouldn't except you left them while performing a task) eat up cpu cycles, more cpus are sure no harm, but unfortunately the most apps are still singlethreaded (except of the split of ui and logic), so at system lvl it brings better performance, at the apps itself unfortunatelly not as much as it could atm.
[Galaxy S III General] junglehunter2:
This is a game. solutuion is to find the mistake in the picture. :laugh:
[Galaxy S III General] AVTR1337:
Haha nice fake, but 3D would be really nice, i loved it on the htc evo 3d. Its a nice feature
[Galaxy S III General] Fus3D:
exactly, four capacitive buttons would be perfect, no midde button
[Galaxy S III General] RedDevil46:
Can it run Crysis 3? LoL
[Galaxy S III General] tolis626:
Crysis 3 ain't out yet.Crysis 2 on the other side is ok.Controls are a little messed up.I keep firing and throwing frags at the same time.Dammit...
[Motorola Droid and Milestone Q&A, Help & Troublesh] m0jo:
So it starts again, the bootloader issue..

Motorola has released a tool for unlocking the bootloader of certain devices. Milestone is not one of them yet.

Do you think Motorola will support the Milestone in the near future?

Or maybe this tool can somehow be exploited to unlock more Motorola devices? Any thoughts?

This is the thread about it.
[Motorola Droid and Milestone Q&A, Help & Troublesh] Babis_ECE:
No chance. I believe alsmost none from the existing lineup, especially those from 2011 and backwards (as our Milestone) will get their bootloader unlocked.

Motorola sucks in the development/openess department.

Since I got my Xperia Arc I can see what are the real pros of an unlocked bootloader.:cool:

If it wasn't for nadlabak (mainly) we would still have a FroYo (and a buggy one...) ROM flashed into our devices.
[Motorola Droid and Milestone Q&A, Help & Troublesh] hkleomap:
Milestone !? I don't think so.
[Galaxy Tab General] chrispysaid:
I have been at this for a week now. I've tried Heimdall 1.1.1, 1.3.2, AND Odin3 v1.83, v1.85, to reflash the stock Verizon firmware on my Galaxy Tab SCH-i800. I was an idiot and flashed U.S. Cellular firmware, which changed the boot animation and the cell service text. I've scoured the internet on how to do this and everything I've tried has failed. With Heimdall, whenever I plug in the stock files to the program (in 1.1.1 only, I can't figure out 1.3.2 for the life of me) and hit Start, I get "Failed to access device. Error: -12" I'm getting my files from SCH-I800_VZW_stock.zip, it's been extracted. When trying to flash a .tar file with Odin, it works successfully, then my phone goes into bootloop. I can get back to Download mode, but every time I try flashing a stock .tar, I get the same results. I'm starting to go crazy. Anyone help?
[Galaxy Tab General] sos_sifou:
maybe you have missed with your partions? if so, i think you need a specific pit file for this stock rom, i dont know where it is, but you might start looking for it.

edit : look in this thread, you might find it useful http://xdaforums.com/archive/index.php/t-940046.html

and this is also important http://theunlockr.com/2012/06/28/ho...axy-tab-sch-i800-back-to-stock-and-unroot-it/

last one http://gizmoninja.com/2011/04/how-to-root-latest-samsung-galaxytab-verizon-update-ec02/

best regards ^_^

Sifou
[Galaxy Tab General] leapinlar:
Did you properly install the Samsung drivers on your PC using the heimdall utility? And you put your Tab in download mode?
[Galaxy Tab General] zerocide:
The Problem may lie with youe Heimdall setup.

Make sure you have Keis installed. Then make sure you activate the drivers for Heimdall.

This is a great rom to flash to your VZW Tab. follow this thread http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1325469
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] penn2014:
Every time I attempt to install superuser.zip for perm root i get

E:Error in /sdcard/Superuser.zip

(Status 0

Any advice?!

Also when I attempt to install Cyanogenmod 10 I get

Assert failded: getprop("ro.product.device") == "endeavoru" || getprop("r

E:Error in /sdcard/cm10_endeavoru-otu-eng.noeri-007.zip

(Status 7)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] E.Cadro:
Advice is your trying to install a rom for the international one x so its going to fail. I'm guessing that the superuser zip is also for the wrong phone as well. Stick to roms and mods posted here under att rogers one xl.

Sent from my HTC One XL using Forum Runner
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] redpoint73:
If you are on the AT&T or Rogers (Snapdragon S4) version of the One X, you need to stop everything you are doing and read up first. That isn't the correct way to get root on this device. Also, as already mentioned, that ROM is not one for this device (its for the Tegra3 international version - different hardware). Proceed without the proper knowledge, and you have a high probability of bricking the phone. Start reading here: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1671237

If you have the Tegra3 (international) version of the One X, you are in the wrong forum. You need to be here: http://xdaforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1533
[Atrix 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] yungwunxxx:
Here's what happen i rooted, boot unlock the phone it was on 2.3.6 GB i installed beta-0.1.0-2d-cm-9.0.0-RC0-Atrix-KANG-signed.zip - ZIP archive and gapps problem orginally was there was no android market (play) and the interal sd card was not mounted i restarted the phone this menu came up (below ) when i went to 9 or 10 they said( Magic Value Mismatch) so i kept trying , nothing happen so i tried to flash recover then it said no OS will boot in 5 seconds so i used a factory stock 4-5-91-stock-firmware-52952 from a link i got from this site so now its at this point here again :

OS will boot in 5 seconds

Press a Key to stop count down

Available modes are:

1 RSD

2 Fastboot

3NvFlash

4 BP HW Bypass RSD

5 BP HW Bypass QC DLOAD

6 BP HW Diag & Boot AP

7 BP HW Bypass BP Only

8 BP SW Bypass RSD

9 Android Recovery

10 Boot Android (No BP)

11 Device UID

12 Console=tty50,115200n8

13 Early USB Enumeration

14 BP Tools

current choice is mode:

RSD

Poweringon BP

Cold- booting Linux

Reading ODM fuse: 1

I have no idea what to do and i just got this atrix yesterday and suggestions or tips ?
[Atrix 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] benem3000:
Considering you have fastboot and RSD you should be able to fix this... Firstly is your bootloader unlocked?