yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] noregretzzzz:
I am loving this kernel! I was wondering if there was any possibility of supporting pgm2 wake? That app is awesome.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1721895
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MДЯCЦSДИT:
I can't find a patch for that for the life of me...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Fire n mage:
Which governor is best for battery life? Technically speaking, according to the format of each and their capabilities.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ÜBER™:
Pegasusq

Sent from my Nexus 7
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Braneless:
Weird....this kernel seems to run well and has a lot of features, but I couldn't for the life of me get Quick ICS Browser (compatible w/JB) to work.

All of my other apps and the stock browser works, but QIB force closes upon startup. Tried uninstalling and reinstalling, but no luck. Restored my backup to get it to work.

I did not activate any of the Trickster mods - should I? Anyone else have similar issues? Codename rom btw.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] spitefulrain:
I'm not really sure the kernel would cause incompatibility with an app, though someone can feel free to correct me if I'm wrong :) did it work on other kernels?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Braneless:
Yes, it works with the stock Codename kernel and stopped only after flashing nyan. I restored back to Codename with its prepackaged kernel and the app works perfectly.

I've observed similar issues with other kernel/app combos; for instance, my LMT shortcut icons refused to work with Franco's kernels, but work fine with Trinity and Nyan.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] killersloth:
maybe this will fix it?

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=27515966&postcount=20011
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jxr94:
Out of curiosity Uber, does the rom/kernel combo in you sig reflect what you're currently running, or is it outdated? If it is not, how's your battery life and on-screen time? I've seen a couple of screenshots by you around here with those posted.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ÜBER™:
Its old. I'm running Franco kernel now. But that's all that has changed.

Sent From My Toro+ via White Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] GBPackerFanForLife:
Gonna have to give this kernel a try..have been trying them all really haven't found a solid one..Hell maybe its me...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] scarmon25:
I'm the same way. I've tried them all. I'm a picky person myself. Thats my problem though. The devs are doing great work.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] GBPackerFanForLife:
So far its running pretty good..
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] frenchy714:
@Marcus

Have you implemented the new wifi drivers?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MДЯCЦSДИT:
Sorry, I've been really busy with school and hope to get an update out with internet/WiFi improvements and other changes this weekend.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MДЯCЦSДИT:
I will eventually put out a full change-log with the full release. For now, just know that a whole ton has changed...

B4 Test1: http://marcusant.com/nyankernel/tuna/Nyan-Tuna-Beta4-Test1.zip
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] firket2000:
Did you update the trickster mod to latest version?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nibrwr:
Just installed b4test1. Is pegasusq the suggested governor?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ÜBER™:
Preferred Governor. Yes

Sent From My Toro+ via White Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MДЯCЦSДИT:
Yes and the script now removes the old version (and wipes previous settings to prevent things left behind that don't apply to Nyan)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] frenchy714:
Thanks for your work. I'm assuming like your previous build you can adjust gpu freq? What is the default gpu freq?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] grey.ghost:
Seems solid, I had an odd screen at boot (yellow lines) for a flash, but so far no other oddities. Nice job M.
[HTC EVO 3D] rafaelluik:
After the official update to ICS there are some duplicate apps on Android's app manager.

For example, "Android System" and "HTC Sense" are is listed twice (I'm not sure they were before). Respectively... 10.21 MB v. 4.0.3-eng... and 29.73 MB v. 1.2.22144... Version 2.7.2214332... and 3.5.2214333147...

Here are the others:

Friend Stream 3.5.221311... and 3.5.2211262318...

Notes 1.0.2212342753... and 1.0.2215143145...

People 3.5.2215242764... and 3.5.2212132158...

3 "Weather" (though I think one is the app, the other is the live wallpaper and the other the update service, though there's also Weather provider, who knows)

Is that normal? I was willing to factory reset the phone, in case someone already did it after the update can you please tell me if the issue persists?
[HTC EVO 3D] coal686:
I've seen the same. I think it's normal.

Read, Search, Read again, ... Then Ask with Tapatalk 2
[HTC EVO 3D] rafaelluik:
Just so you know I have done a factory reset for other reason and checked this. It remained with these "duplicates", so it's normal...
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ch33kster:
Anyone here uses flip case with magnetic clip?

My friend and I encountered a strange issue which we heard weird bell-like sounds coming from the speaker of our I9300 when we are using a flip case with magnetic clip.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JJEgan:
Probably in the Accessories section .

jje
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ch33kster:
You have any idea if magnetic cases damage the phone?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Jamesyboy:
We have plenty of' threads for sharing our home screens-- and every once in a while someone posts a screenshot of their lock screen as well there, but sometimes choosing a lock screen is even harder than setting up an ideal home screen work space. The lock screen has to be functional, but most of the time, we just end up using our icons, and don't actually interact with our widgets. We interact with our lock screen every time we pick up our device! Most developers have done a good enough job that we don't even think about our lock screen any more (which is why some won't fancy a glance here) but here we go!

Post 'em here, and please include what app/theme your using, so we don't run afoul like the home screen threads; with two or three "how in god's name did you manage that?" For every share!

Here's mine! MiLocker with a Chinese theme! It has an extremely low res wallpaper and graphics, but it's just geeky enough for me! You can find the theme a few rows down under the online themes "hottest" tab!

View attachment 1270945
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] bcald7:
This is my older one that I still like. I used Widget Locker for the slides.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] helix massacre:
My BBB inspired light blue trans icons :D and my Batman inspired icons

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=30415111
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] samot86:
Bobclock3d, Missed It!, and Widget Locker
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] filipinowise:
How did you get the time like that on the lock screen?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] helix massacre:
Widget locker

My superhero inspired icons :D

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=30415111
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Trevino07:
Guess it doesn't like my pics , oh well
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] filipinowise:
Thanks
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] t0mmyr:
As a senior member here I just want to state I think it's retarded to have 2 seperate development forums for one device. I don't even know how long this forum existed here until the other day someone mentioned something was in the original dev section.

If there were a vote I would vote to just have a single common development forum.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] xlinth:
I agree
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Jeffreycat:
I second your opinion; it causes confusion having 2 separate sub-forums for development on one device.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] coiledwire:
Agreed. How you can have cm10/rujelus/venum/etc roms in the other section while cm9/jb aosp and calk's roms is here in original development is beyond me.

Edit: Even the OG Epic forums have only 1 dev section. I don't see the standardization here.

Sent from my SPH-D710
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] rovar:
Cool kid trying to get noticed by breaking the rules and posting in the wrong forum, pretty pathetic with all the big "I'm senior member" talk.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] brooksyx:
I think posting a thread about how you thing a section is pretty stupid if you ask me...

How does thread have anything to do with development?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] *Luke*:
View attachment 1270966
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] HaiKaiDo:
While I would normally agree with you, I also think that this section is pointless. I could MAYBE see if they wanted to seperate kernels from the dev section so that they were easier to find MAYBE....but yeah this seems like pointless clutter.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] SFG:
I think AOSP roms should be in a different group from TW and themed roms. I like the idea of it but obviously this is currently sorta quirky. Just my 2 cents.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] thewadegeek:
I think the point is too keep down on the useless questions and the like in a development thread, but that clearly doesn't work.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] chris41g:
It's meant to keep actual development separate from kangs and the same rom 100 times with 100 themes. They didn't want to tell all the people making winzip roms they had to stop posting in development.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] t0mmyr:
it just confuses me even more :(

it took me a week and several pages of scrolling in the xda app to have finally realized cm9 was moved over to this newly created forum, i think if this would have been here from the start then it wouldn't be so irritating but this sub forum feels like its only been here about a week or 2, and as a non-developer but xda enthusiast i just don't know how to differentiate original and android development?? should mui be in here too since its an original of its type? why isnt cm10 in here but cm9 is? i dunno, personally i liked it all under 1 subforum where F5 is my friend, i lurk the roms i like....just my opinion, mods can do whatever they like with my thread, lock it, delete it, warn me, whatever, i was just voicing my opinion in the section it was related (albeit its not a rom i developed, this is just a thread i developed lol), eitherway i'm always greatful for xda and all the talented developers here, since you stopped by my thread chris41g, i'd like to thank you as one of the top 10 devs for our device, we wouldn't be at this stage of customization for this model phone if it weren't for your help.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] rovar:
So you call the split stupid but you cant even find threads. Let alone use the search function.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] vandizzam:
I prefer it this way. There are too many copycat roms in the other section. This allows me to read only about original roms.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] SFG:
Well put.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Apk07:
I don't really agree with it, I'm just constantly checking both. Puts more work into looking around for the "average" member.

If I had my way, there would be subforums:

1. CM+MIUI+Codename+AOKP+AOSP (The multi-device roms)

2. Roms based off stock/TW (Developed soley for the E4GT)

4. Kernels/Recovery/Modems

5. Themes/Apps/Stand-alone mods
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] TheAtheistOtaku:
so are ya here to put in your opinion, or just complain about posters? you have attitude problems man, dont post if al your gunna do is come at people/

anyways, i could see the point of two separate forums if it had some uniformity. doesnt make sense to put cm9 in one, and cm10 in another. just confuses people when both roms should be in original

and you can argue with allot of roms on where to put them. like aokp for example, it should go in original, but since its built from cyanogenmod you can argue that it should go in the other one.

but you can also argue that us senior member are just cranky because stuff is changing, like all senior facebook users are when facebook changes profile layout, or timeline, or whatever they call it now
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] donsh00tmesanta:
im also a senior member and I think the idea was separate the tw roms/kernel from the non tw but that jelly bean rom is still there

Given my senior member status

:p.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] krazy_smokezalot:
If ppl use search more often you may find wat your looking for! This extra thread in a development section is stupid!

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] CaptainMorgan:
Hey now, I use winrar!
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Freeroot:
hooray, more junk to sift through *sorry mods*

Now, I really like the change and I think you will get used to it. Somebody somewhere put a lot of thought into making it the way it is and I think you all should try to appreciate that and try to figure out why they would put time into this. That said, inbeforethelock.jpeg
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] donsh00tmesanta:
Now if only they'd split the Gnex forums like the GS3 ones...
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] yellowman82:
Seriously the change wasn't that bad I just.cant believe it actually took some folks this long to realize there was another dev thread with roms in it lol I use xda or tapatalk app on my phone every day once a saw the new thread I was curious and went in and noticed the split lol.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] squshy 7:
"As a senior member..."

As a senior member you posted non-development in a development section? Face palm?

IB4TL
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] rovar:
My opinion is people complaining about this are stupid, in case it wasnt clear fom my very first post.

To begin with, this argument was brought up right when the section was split. If you wanted to cry you're late by three weeks.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] patrao_n:
Ummmm in before jay locks this one too :)

sent from my BAD A$$ Epic touch
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] CyberpodS2:
The only thing I want to add, if only cause this thread will get whacked anyway (IBTL) is that in my case I use the xda app starting with favorites. If you had this forum subscribed, this new section did not show up. I only saw it on the desktop. It took me a little while to figure out why I was not seeing it on the phone. As for complaining about the separate section, I welcome it. I only wish, as mentioned earlier that there was a more consistent application regarding what builds belong where. Maybe we should just assume the mods are currently deciding that and it is a work in progress.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] woody296:
When i go somewhere to get help and people give me their time for free, I try not to complain if i have to do a little work on my own.;)
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Imaginos:
There IS a difference between the actual dev content and the a-la-carte roms. Kind of like having all the source albums in one forum and your custom mix tapes in the other.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] rovar:
This soooo much.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] JOEOZUNA4U:
All "teams" should "team up" and post all their themes in themes & apps instead of posting a "new" rom wich in reality its the same rom, same tweaks but with different theme.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] abusedcloth:
+1 separate tw and aosp/aokp
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] elliwigy:
surprised this thread is still here.. not sure why its confusing to people.. there is a clear difference between aosp roms and tw roms.. only issue i have is with people like the op clearly posting there issues in the wrong threads.. especially this one.. not to mention all it does is cause more confusion and will end up in an argument like many of the "i hate sprint" threads
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] mattneedshelp:
^ This right here.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] crawrj:
It is confusing because it isn't being used as it was intended. The intention was to split original (aosp/aokp) work from tw. However if you look at the tops threads you have Blu Kuban, Calks EL29, Agat's Kernel, Kuban Kernel etc... All of which are TW projects. So I agree that currently it is pointless to have two seperate threads. I also agree that if it was being used for its intended purpose it would be a great idea. I also agree that the OP should have posted this thread in the general section and not in the development section. And lastly, in before lock :p
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] jahrule:
Here here... (I agree)
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] yellowman82:
I for one dont see it confusing only.thing for me is that.I really dont know what the split was intended for as for I did not see jay or any other Mod explain the intention of splitting or having 2 development thread, but you seem to be certain what this split was intended for may I ask where you got this info from?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] elliwigy:
all the kernels you listed besides the el29 are built from original source for our phones.. the roms however are seperated between modified twiz roms and this thread has the aosp roms.. still confused? lol but agreed it can be confusing since the kernels posted here are made for tw roms in the other section.. a moderator needs to post a better explanation.. it is a good concept however if you ask me
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] woody296:
I only wish that my world was so simple that the only thing i could find to complain about was having 2 separate threads:eek:
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] crawrj:
It isn't confusing to me personally either but it makes it a pain to have to check each one when you are looking for something. I can see where people could be confused by it though.

I don't have knowledge of this particular split. I am basing that on history. I remember reading discussions on it a long time ago. Look at the other forums, sgs3, nexus etc... They all have the original android development section. But they all pertain to AOSP, AOKP, MIUI etc... So no I don't have first hand knowledge as to the intent of the GS2 split. Based on history and the layout of the other forums I would feel comfortable that my assumption is correct.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] rmikulus:
Its really nice to see all of the roms that I actually use all in one forum. Just looks like someone started moving threads over and got a little lazy halfway through.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] woody296:
There are 2 choices correct? It really isn't that tough, a or b. At that point the threads with the latest activity are on the first one or two pages, that is where most of us will be looking. Are we so lazy we can't put in a little effort on our own?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] playya:
The answer is yes. I believe a lot of xda user have proven without a shadow of a doubt just how lazy they can be. To me it is what it is and I have seen it around in quite a few other forums and although its a PITA you will get used to it and it will be the norm soon enough.

So lets all complain and get it out of our systems now so we can move on and just deal with it....
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] marksman34:
It seems to be an ineffective way of reducing clutter, but it feels worse. I think if all the original roms that go beyond a few simple tweaks are in here the rom wiki that's all we need. Sadly it doesn't seem to get much love.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] gatesmarch123:
But how do you REALLY feel about this thread?

Here's how I really feel. It's super annoying that pretty much every link in the other development thread leads to a dead link at Goo. In this thread I've yet to encounter such an issue. I'll hang out in this thread thanks.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] dmonger11b:
All the complaining really doesn't matter if the admins want to change something its their choice.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] obelisk79:
the second forum is dumb... i can deal with it, but it is still really silly imho
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Skitzi:
I think it makes sense. Although I think the names are wrong. "Original Development" should be "Development" while the old thread should be Rom Cooking or Stock edits or something.

My understanding is one forum is for from scratch or AOSP coded projects, while the other thread is for kitchen roms, ported roms, tweaks to stock. I think the wild card would be large smali editing projects that revamp a stock rom.

There was a post on the main page about it, from my understanding lots of it is based of off Cyanogen's thoughts from way back regarding development work vs. kitchen roms or ported roms.

Edit: now whether things are always in the correct place or not, who knows and that could be a good argument against having two threads.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Doctor_XXX:
The two forums were a bit "confusing" for the first day or two, but now...who cares?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] krazy_smokezalot:
y is this still open ctfu lol

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] jayharper08:
While the discussion is fine, the placement is not. O_o

Thread moved. I'll chime in later, but for now, it boils down to this. When I look for something to flash, I want something new and "original". Not the same rom with themed icons, status bar, and someone else's tweak that's thrown in. It's not that hard to click the back button and click the other section if you need to.

Edit: And please do not take this out if context. In no way am I disrespecting anyone for what they do. I know as well as anyone else what these guys put into this. ;)

---Jay--- From the GNexus™
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] nsxla:
Couldn't agree more!
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] mattykinsx:
Why is the CM10 thread not in the original development?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] jayharper08:
Because it is a kang, not official from the CM team. I've talked to Phantom about this already "behind close doors". (PM). ;)

---Jay--- From the GNexus™
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] mattykinsx:
Wouldn't CM9 fit that description as well then since it's not official? ;)
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] jayharper08:
Must have been missed. I'll check into it.

---Jay--- From the GNexus™
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] slick_rick:
Quoting for truth.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] ethandissi:
I have a crazy idea, just combine the forums again... less confusion... if you want to go all out on people just theming roms, move their roms into the theming section that would cut down on clutter... but making 2 sections for the same purpose is pointless...
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] mattykinsx:
Ehh it might be easier.

I can see the logic in the two sub forums but I would have to say that I think anything built from source whether its a "kang" or "official" should NOT fall into the same category as a themed ROM.:eek:
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] MoHoGalore:
Why hasn't anyone dropped this link as posted on XDA as to why it was done? Or did I miss it.. which is plausable since I like to drink.. :burp:

http://www.xda-developers.com/android/introducing-original-development-forums-for-more-devices/

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] chris41g:
its worked on by official CM developers, but its not an officially supported device.. TeamEpic (most) and I are all CM developers, and there is a ton of original development that goes into the CM9 for this device. Without which, CM10 wouldnt be where it is today. I don't believe CM9 falls under that description. It is the epitome of original development.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Nannuq:
Well that actually makes sense
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] _dan:
What we really need is to split Themes and Apps. I think it'll get people to make a theme instead of a "themed" rom of someones work.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] jayharper08:
I'll just leave it at that. Everyone has voiced their opinions and we can see who doesn't like it and who does. The fact is though, that it will remain how it is. I apologize if you don't care for it.

---Jay--- From the GNexus™
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Papa Smurf151:
Just throwing my two cents in here. There are reasons as to why the original development is here and I 100% agree with it. Complain all you want but its not going anywhere.

Thread closed again
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] jayharper08:
:p Thread closed again. ;)

Trololololol

---Jay--- From the GNexus™