yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Off-topic] iLeopard:
So before I go into any details and to avoid any possible biased answer, if you are familiar with computer hardware or building PC's in general; Do yall see any issues/incompatibilities with this hardware:

- G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) Desktop Memory Model F3-12800CL9D-4GBRL

Newegg:http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...&cm_mmc=TEMC-RMA-Approvel-_-Content-_-text-_-

- Intel Core i3-2120 Sandy Bridge 3.3GHz LGA 1155 65W Dual-Core Desktop Processor Intel HD Graphics 2000 BX80623I32120

Newegg: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...&cm_mmc=TEMC-RMA-Approvel-_-Content-_-text-_-

- Seagate ST3250310CS 250GB 7200 RPM 8MB Cache SATA 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive

Newegg:http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...&cm_mmc=TEMC-RMA-Approvel-_-Content-_-text-_-

- Diablotek PHD Series PHD380M 380W Micro ATX Power Supply

Newegg: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...&cm_mmc=TEMC-RMA-Approvel-_-Content-_-text-_-

Forgot to add the motherboard, fail lol:

- ASRock H61M-GE LGA 1155 Intel H61 HDMI Micro ATX Intel Motherboard

Newegg: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157256

As far as I can tell, no, but then again I am a newbie when it comes to this. Thanks in advance!
[Off-topic] phishphinger:
You seem to be missing a motherboard!
[Off-topic] SolInvictus:
I'm no expert, but I would definitely be getting a MUCH higher output PSU.
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
And maybe clue us in on your budget, because what I see so far is a mixed bag, half-empty.

Sent from my coffee pot.
[Off-topic] ShawnReeves:
Depends

If he is just running the the single hard drive and perhaps a low-mid range gaming card that PSU will work fine. When you start adding more drives and high power hungry gaming cards then yes he would need to move up to a higher dual rail PSU.
[Off-topic] iLeopard:
I am, forgot to add it. Its there now, thanks for the heads up
[Off-topic] iLeopard:
Thank you, much appreciated
[Off-topic] iLeopard:
Thats correct, I only plan on using one optical drive, one hard drive and just the integrated graphics on the i3 so that PSU should hold up fine.

Its pretty much just a low budget computer for family use, nothing big.
[Off-topic] iLeopard:
So the question still remains, do you guys see any incompatibility issues?
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
Nope.

Sent from my coffee pot.
[Off-topic] ohyeahar:
Nope.

But I would make the following changes/additions:

- Bump the RAM up to 2 x 4GB

- Throw in an SSD.
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
Yup.

To the OP...You can always go higher, but if the you budget is strict, build it, use it, then make your determination.

Sent from my coffee pot.
[Off-topic] iLeopard:
Thanks for the replies guys. The reason I ask is because these are the parts I purchased to rebuild the family computer. Well I plugged everything in and the fans spun and everything but I got no video signal on my monitor. I tried with a discrete graphics card and with every possible input on the mobo but still no video signal. I RMA'd as defective but I wanted to make sure I didn't make a dumb mistake when something was incompatible.
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
Hmm...what gfx card did you try it with?

Sent from my coffee pot.
[Off-topic] iLeopard:
I tried a cheap PNY GEFORCE GT 610, just to see if it would work but still no video signal.

I shouldn't even need a graphics card though, the 2120 has integrated HD 2000 Graphics and the motherboard supports HD 2000/3000
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
Yeah, the integrated CPU graphics should handle normal use just fine.

The gt610 I think is DDR3...is that what the motherboard supports?

Sent from my coffee pot.
[Off-topic] iLeopard:
Yep, I do believe so.
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
Well, did you even try the CPU gfx before RMAing the motherboard?

Sent from my coffee pot.
[Off-topic] iLeopard:
Before even installing the discrete graphics card I did try connecting my monitor straight to the mobo, with VGA, DVI, and HDMI but nothing ever worked and it was then when I decided I would try the graphics card to see if I could get legacy video support but nothing.
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
Coulve been a bad mobo then. Hopefully you'll get a replacement soon.

I'll keep checking back here though, and feel free to pm me if needed.

Sent from my coffee pot.
[Off-topic] iLeopard:
Well thanks for the help, ran out of "thanks" :D But will certainly shoot you a PM if I need more info
[Off-topic] ShawnReeves:
You"re good to go!

None at all iLepard, you"re good to go as far as compatibly goes. Hopefully you RMA'd the weak link. PC will be fine to run the latest Windows software or Linux if you dare. Happy building!
[HTC Rezound] rcavalier3:
Can I flash the sense 3.6 camera over the camera that comes with sense 4?
[HTC Rezound] who MIKE D:
No, the framework is not the same and will just force close
[HTC Rezound] AshtonTS:
The real question is: why the hell would you want the sense 3.6 camera!?
[HTC Rezound] carngeX:
Interface of 3.6 looks nicer than 4, IMO. I do wish that it could be done but oh well lol.
[HTC Rezound] rcavalier3:
Yea, I like the interface and focus on 3.6 better. Plus, its not like you can really use the speed burst feature from 4 anyway....
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bgduece22:
IThe volume is to low now for my bluetooth stereo headphones. How would I increase the gain in the ROM.I am not talking the slider in the sound menu.In the past on other phone you could hack certain hexidecimal values to increase the volume. I have know idea how to do it with this phone, or the Android OS. It would help out a lot since I listen to a lot of music through bluetooth in my cars also. .Also with this ROM I can not flash a boot animation, I was able to flash a new splash screen though. I know I am asking a lot, but this place is the best, and I know that you have the answers.

Thanks in advance recently unlocked and rooted my HTC Evo 4G and installed the htc_supersonic-ota-eng.deck-pb25.zip ROM. It works beautiful.
[General Questions and Answers] fishingfon:
Anyone?

Sorry for my impatience, but I am trying to make some mods, but I can't recompile the apk :(

Corey
[Asus Transformer TF700] rightonred:
Unfortunately I got one of those tabs that won't OTA or unlock. I've contacted asus and told them that I can't receive OTAs, and I got the canned "flash the updates manually".:silly: This is an unacceptable solution because for one it's a PITA to update it that way, and I still won't be able to unlock the bootloader.

I have avoided mentioning the un-unlockable boatloader problem to the asus rep because I'm not sure it is covered under warranty. But the has me thinking: Could I argue that the device is being sold as unlockable and my device does not meet that spec and is therefore defective? If not, could I argue the same for the fact that it won't receive OTAs?

I am also wondering if the reason it won't function properly is because I got it as an exchange from Best Buy instead of buying it fresh. Has anyone gotten it the same way and not had the same issue?

I'm still within my 30 days, but I'm afraid if I exchange it I'll get another un-unlockable tablet.
[Asus Transformer TF700] MartyHulskemper:
I'd advise you to:

1) not argue that unlockability is a device 'feature', since pretty much all Android devices are sold locked, and since you purchased it in that state -- not even knowing if the unlocker will become become available or not -- signifies your accepance of the device even in a locked state;

2) press the fact that you canot receive OTAs and that workability suffers as a result. At least under European consumer law, ASUS would be responsible for selling a finished and workable product. The state in which the TF700 has shipped so far is suboptimal to say the least, and the fixes since have brought tangible improvements. Saying "oh, flash the updates manually yourself" in my mind is the same as a automobile manufacturer opting to NOT do a calllback of sold vehicles due to some ailment (faulty brake discs, or safety belts or something) but instead shipping the parts to their customers and saying "well, you can handle a pair of scissors and a screwdriver, right? Do it yourself then." -- I say, screw them. If this argument fails as wel, you have a support rep with only a few glands where the brain should be located (probably only a visual cortex to be able to type on a keyboard and find it way to the toilet). If that is the case, first drop Gary Key a line, since he has offered to intervene on a customer's behalf before. That might be a second line of rescue.

3) If all else fails, exchange nonetheless, the risk of receiving another essentially-faulty unit notwithstanding. If OTAs and the bootloader issue are a sign of ASUS not having your serial number in their database, you might get into trouble if in need of warranty later on. I'd prefer a few returns to issues down the way (even though I know the feeling of having to wait yet again, and having to run the setup again and so on, and so on), but hey, that's just me.

Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T
[Asus Transformer TF700] rightonred:
1. I guess I could say that because asus released the bootloader unlock, and it works on most of the tablets except for mine, that my tablet is not receiving the same services due to a technical glitch. Heck I could even say the same for the OTA updates.

Fear Not, I am avoiding this argument religiously. I don't even want to mention the "b word" to asus, it would complicate the issue more than it needs to be.

2. I am leaning hard on getting the OTA updater fixed. At the moment it's what I am most concerned about. ASUS telling me to flash the updates manually is less than acceptable. It's simply not convenient or practical for me to continue to flash them manually. The problem is that the problem is beyond the tech support people. Which is not surprising. The engineers are the only ones with the actual knowledge and they don't deal with customers. The tech support are merely handed a card with questions and responses. My only hope is to press the rep until they hand the matter off to someone more knowledgeable. The bootloader I guess is what is driving me to get the problem fixed.

My problem at the moment is trying to prove that the ota's are broken. The rep told me that the .26 update probably hasn't been released to my district yet and I should wait. I say BS, the .26 update has been out for long enough I should have gotten it. I even gave the bootloader unlocker a shot: network error. Yup, I would be gray long before the update to hit my device.;) Problem is I can't say that to the rep without mentioning the aforementioned "b word".

Fortunately, I read a thread here (I'm too lazy to look it up now) about a prime user who successfully RMAd for the same issue, and got it fixed.
[Asus Transformer TF700] MartyHulskemper:
Sounds like a plan to me. ;)

Yup, you're caught in a protocol. Not bad in itself, but when you;re experiencing soething that isn't covered by the protocol, you're pretty much screwed unless you can get through to their second line of defense. ;)

I think that you should have gotten the update by now as well. It seems to have been delivered worldwide, so there's no reason for you to be exempt from the bliss the rest of the owners are already experiencing. ;) The bootloader not unlocking due to a network error is an argument believable for two or maybe three tries, but when it stubbornly keeps refusing to be unlocked, well, that is symptomatic of something else.

I did hear several reports of Prime users getting their units succesfully RMA'd, but also at least one user reporting that he received his unit in an locked state, from which he was no longer able to unlock. That might be a problem in your case...

Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T
[Asus Transformer TF700] rightonred:
Its a shame though, the tablet works perfectly other wise. The wifi and gps reception is excellent. no dead pixels, hot pixels, dark or light spots, dust under display, scratches, etc. The screen is bonded frimly to the back and is not loose. In fact I think it's one of the nicer tabs out there. It's just that the thing won't update (or unlock).:(
[Asus Transformer TF700] Eddie Hicks:
There must be a problem with some of these tablets and OTA updates. I received my Infinity a week ago with the. 21 firmware. No matter what I did it would not update OTA to 22. I did a manual update to. 22 which was very easy. A couple days later. 26 was available on their website. Again no OTA update and again I did it manually with no problem. My Infinity was neither rooted or unlocked at the time though I rooted after the. 26 update. I have read post on various forums with other owners with the same exact update issue while others did receive their updates OTA. I guess that shows that there are differences between this same model being it a software or hardware problem. Other than the OTA update issue my Infinity is working great. Much better than the 3 Primes that I owned.
[Asus Transformer TF700] MartyHulskemper:
We have a strong hunch that the issue is on ASUS' end, probably the serial numbers not being available in their database of shipped units, and therefore a) preventing OTA and b) preventing bootloader unlocking (since that's another instance of serial number checks against said database). Has any one of you run the unlock app already? I'd bet a beer on it it fails as well.
[Asus Transformer TF700] rightonred:
You didn't loose that beer.

The I-can't-unlock-or-update club is picking up quite a few members. I'll have to remember to bring donuts and coffee to the next meeting.:p

Anyway, I've given up on tech support. If it's affecting a significant number of people, asus will find out about it and fix it. At the moment it's a pain, but I'm not too worried.:cool:
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BenG7:
Hi

this is what I experience with my new Galaxy S3:

My main charge + USB -> microusb cable used to charge the S3, now it won't (the battery does flash for a few seconds as if it was charging but then it stops)

I need to plug the phone to my laptop to get it charged and it takes far longer!

Has anyone solved the issue?

Thanks a lot

BenG
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] watsa:
Faulty or loose charge point/charger? There is no issue with charging in the phone itself.

Edit: You just ended up making 2 identical threads
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BenG7:
already ordered a charger that matches the s3's specs i.e.

model: ETAOU81EBE

Input: 100-240V ~

Frequency: 50-60Hz 0.15A

Ouput: 5.0V 1.0A

currently only modele available that does it is the ETAOU81EBE.

I'm wating for it.

sorry for double post.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] prabhjots:
I'm facing the same issue. I'm unable to charge via the mains adaptor.

Yesterday I was facing this issue at around 30%. I let the battery drain to around 10% and charging was successful.

However, I'm now unable to charge via AC mains. Please help.

The phone shows "Charging" for a brief 10 seconds period and then the charging signal turns off.

I have tried the same with other chargers eg. Galaxy Ace's charger, in vain. I have tried charging another phone with my AC charger, and it works without a hitch.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rohan999:
question already asked...please search before posting..

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1727540

And the answer to the question, software update fixes it in my case but you could try another temp fix, remove the battery from your phone (don't select power off from the phone just directly remove the battery)....keep it removed for a minute or two and the put it back and the plug the charger with the phone still OFF!!

:)
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] clouds5:
another question on the same topic, i had the same issues with my charger, brought it back to the store and he said he could send it in or just give me a SGS II adapter which is safe (according to him).

would it also be safe to just use the wall adapter from my previous phone the HTC Desire HD? Its alot sleeker in switzerland than the samsung ones :)

It has exactly the same stats on the back:

Input: 100-240V ~200mA 50-60Hz

Output: 5V --- 1A
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BenG7:
It should be safe as these are the same specs as an s3 charger (but the specs of the charger he is given you are not those of an S2 charger: S2's are

input: 100-240V ~200mA 50-60Hz

Output: 5V --- 0.7A
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
I've been trying to restore back to stock for over a day now and still havn't figured it out.

All of the guides start talking about adb or fastboot right in the middle of the guide without any explanation.

Aruwizard keeps saying bootloader version fail when I try to flash whats supposed to be stock rogers rom, but everything i see is telling me to download the one im already using.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] niceppl:
1. download rogers ruu.zip

2. get supercid or downgrade follow http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1671135

3. use the windows ruu tool ..... or .... get adb and fastboot installed correctly. google this if you dont know how

4a. for windows ruu tool follow my post in dev section

4b. for adb and fastboot do

fastboot erase cache

fastboot oem rebootRUU

fastboot flash zip ruu.zip

it will ask u to run the last command again...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] thejosh86:
Have you relocked your bootloader?

1. make sure fastboot in android is turned off under power.

2. power off device

3. power phone on by holding down the volume down key + pressing power - don't release the volume down key until you see the bootloader screen

4. select fastboot

5. connect phone usb

6. screen should now read fastboot usb in red

7. type fastboot oem lock

Phone might restart back into fastboot can't really remember but now you can run the RUU.

The RUU should be an .exe for the above
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
im on 1.73 trying to flash reflash 1.73, so i shouldnt need to use super cid (?).

I download the rogers stock rom (PJ83IMG_Evita_UL_Rogers_WWE_1.73.631.1_Radio_0.16a.32.09.06_10.81.32.14L_release_254934_signed.zip)

and I downloaded ARUwizard to flash it.

I keep getting random errors from aruwizard.

ive tried finding adb tools or fastboot, but they all look like they're for specific phones.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] niceppl:
for aruwizard....did you install htc sync? and relocked your bootloader?...

u need both ...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
I did.

and my bootloader has never been unlocked.

its giving me something about incorrect bootloader version. even though its the rogers rom.

Do i need to super cid if im flashing the same version? (1.73 to 1.73)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
aruwizard just keeps saying "wrong bootloader version"
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
this is what im getting everytime i try to use aruwizard.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] niceppl:
where did u get the aruwizard tool seems its not the one for hox...too old maybe...try the adb amd fastboot method i mentioned above
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
downloaded it from your other thread. http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1658929
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
using fastboot it starts doing the checks, then gets to :

INFOchecking main version...
FAILED (remote: 43 main version check fail)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
looks like even though im trying to flash 1.73 to 1.73 i still need to do the downgrading firmware stuff...

im curious if my failed update upgraded some stuff and failed on the rest...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
now its giving me

FAILED (remote: 44 hboot version check fail)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
anyone?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
$5 to anyone that can tell me how to fix this (get back to full stock)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] niceppl:
unlock

twrp

root

supercid (search in dev)

downgrade to 1.00.000 (search in dev)

relock

run ruu

everything should be back to stock

if you want to change supercid back to roger001

do previous steps again and change the cid to roger001 rather than supercid
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] thejosh86:
Lol $5 thought a twenty was the customary amount

Sent from my HTC One XL
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
I don't want to unlock, id rather keep my warranty as I might be RMA'ing it because of the bluetooth issues im having.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] robertmoore208:
You need to unlock, but alas once you flash the ruu ... The unlocked/tampered proof will be rewritten to stock as well...

From my HTC One X possessed by the Illuminati hybrid kernel
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] vin255764:
It will show relocked instead of locked.Not sure if warranty accept it
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] niceppl:
i think he has tampered tag already

anyway if u havent ublocked yet dont lol

there were root tools that doesnt require unlocked bootloader try those

can you just run the 1.85 ruu？

or

root with those tools that doesnt require unlocked bootloader

supercid

dowgrade version number

then run ruu

forgot u didnt unlock ue bootloader
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] xhao1108:
so......even with cid 11111111......it is still required to downgrade the version # in order to downgrade? (why the f*** did I flash the 1.85 RUU while being canadian...)

I'm getting

"FAILED (remote: 43 main version check fail)"

with a cid of 11111111
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] niceppl:
yes u do... supercid allows u to flash other ruu..

hboot checks main versions... just downgrade using the guide in dev...

and report back. so you can help this guy
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
in order to get past that error you have to read the downgrade thread.

you basically modify your phone so that it thinks its on version 1.000.000.0 and thinks your upgrading instead of downgrading.

I did that and got past that error, then I get the hboot eror.

I dont believe a rogers phone can flash 1.85 properly without unlocking the bootloader.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] niceppl:
yes he can....
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] xhao1108:
And I did......that's why I'm looking for a way to downgrade back to rogers RUU
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
If you've done the mod that makes your software version show as 1.000.000.0 then you shouldnt be getting that error message.

after I did that I got past that message, now im getting something about hboot version.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
what im seeing in other threads.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] xhao1108:
THX man:laugh:I did!

maybe (just maybe) I should write a detailed guide with screen shots...is anyone doing that already? (just to avoid multiple threads on the same thing)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
Just to be clear, you had to edit your software version number and do the supercid mod?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] xhao1108:
not sure about the cid if you are from Rogers, but the version number is a must...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
I need supercid without unlocking my bootloader, and the only tool i can find (spoof-cid.zip) has supercid/bootloader unlock in one tool.

I also need root to get supercid and the links are all broken... (onxr.zip)

edit.

New link for root file : http://www.general-files.com/download/source/gs57f201d8h32i0
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Berserk87:
I did and verified that my phone was rooted, software version edited to 1.000.000.0, and i was using supercid.

When I tried to flash the stock rom again it took a lot longer than normal, then said "error 97 supercid, reflush immediately" so i re-ran the flash command and got the same hboot error as before.

FAILED (remote: 44 hboot version check fail)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] xhao1108:
Did you lock your bootloader?