yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KennyG123:
Drivers get corrupted very easily. Delete and let them reinstall with a good cable.
[HTC One X] LIttleJumpman:
If possible, can anybody posted the camera.apk? if not no worries, thank you for your time?:o
[HTC One X] -fluffy-:
her is camera apk

remember to push it an then delete dalvik cache
[HTC One X] LIttleJumpman:
Thank you for your help.
[Nexus 7 General] Steve-37:
Getting the nexus 7 on my next paycheck and was wondering if there are any issues that I should know about ? Will it do a lot of the tasks done by a laptop ? Smooth os? How is the availability of ROMs ?
[Nexus 7 General] ceejay83:
pretty much all your questions can be answered by just browsing the forums
[Nexus 7 General] kangxi:
You should know that it is a great device! Use it much more than my phone and computer now.
[Nexus 7 General] player911:
Check the speakers, screen lifting, and colors.

Some reports have been suggested that their speakers have blown after watching a movie at full blast. Some have issues with the screen being spongy or coming up from the case. Others say the screens aren't calibrated equally so some are warmer and duller then others.

Mine was fine but the colors were warm compared to other devices. Whites looked a little pinkish. We'll see when I get a replacement from where I killed mine.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SocialReject:
Just curious as to which prepaid carrier was best.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] negrobembon:
In what country?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1455014

....
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SocialReject:
Nice... thanks. I'll check this out.

This thread isn't my problem anymore.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] netbuzz:
I'm on TMobile in Columbus, OH. No complaints here. $30/mo and I get unlimited data. Not sure if that makes it "the best carrier", but I'm definitely not switching carriers any time soon.

You will need to look up coverage maps in your area and ask specifically for experiences in that city.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Lythandra:
Whats best probably depends on your area.

I use the T-Mobile $30 plan and I love it.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] compsciasaur:
T-Mobile in Los Angeles. I found out yesterday that monthly means no Visual Voicemail. Grr.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] rogerchew:
straight talk (ATT) USA
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] netbuzz:
I'm sure you're aware, but for the heck of it - Google Voice has that feature for free.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] compsciasaur:
I've heard that... Can I port my cell number to Google Voice. I'm also a little worried about Voice because I've known people who've had issues with it.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] netbuzz:
You can port your number for $20, but then you will have to get a new prepaid number. As for myself, I just started using the free number they gave me and slowly rolled it out to friends. In all honestly, I don't even know what my real phone number is now. Lots of features with GV.

I have had no issues whatsoever nor I know of anyone who does.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] carloscarvalho:
TIM@Brazil
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pdxtechdoctor:
yes, but monthly - prepaid - also doesn't support conditional call forwarding required for gvoice to work on the cell number.. gvoicemail will only work on calls to the gvoice number... quite the bummer it's the main reason I'm thinking of going to the ATT straight talk BYOD sim from the Tmobile $30 plan

I dont use the minutes or data of the $30.. I'd actually pay $15 to tombile just for the call forwarding feature
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] netbuzz:
No, you're right, it doesn't support conditional call forwarding, but there is always a workaround. I called tmobile and asked them to disable my voice mail. They disabled it and now all calls roll straight to GV voice mail if not answered. The only caviat to that is that if people call you on your tmobile number, the phone will ring forever if not answered, but again, as I mentioned, I don't give that number out, I don't even know what it is.

---------- Post added at 09:03 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:58 AM ----------

The reason to use GV is to have one phone number and a freedom to change carriers, plans, etc. So when you say "gvoicemail will only work on calls to the gvoice number" makes me ask "why would you want anyone to call you at your real number?"

For example, I can have one GV number and hop from carrier to carrier and plan to plan each month. Am I going to give out my new carrier phone number out with each change? No. That's why I already gave everyone my GV number once before.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] compsciasaur:
On the recommendation of another friend I tried Google Voice just for voicemail and ran into the issue pdxtechdoctor was talking about.

I don't want to change my main cell number. I've had the same cell # for 11 years. And you don't need to worry about switching carriers because every carrier is required by law to port your number over if you request it. I've had my cell on Cingular/AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile Monthly now. The only downside is that it takes a few hours to port a number over and for prepaid/monthly some features are removed, evidently. But the upside is keeping the same number no matter what phone you have (Android, iPhone, BlackBerry, dumbphone).
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] badpanda:
T-Mobile 4G monthly $30 a month, using VoIP for calls GVoice(sipdroid+pbxes.org) :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ac3theone:
tmobile, Brooklyn Ny $50 a month
[Asus Transformer TF700] Pretoriano80:
As you can read from the title this thread is about benchmarks results,and decided to open this topic because is very hard to find them in this forum.

So far i,ve seen very different result with this device ,even two devices with the same firmware and no tweaks installed sometimes give a `very different result.

Also people were complaining for bad performance with the 9.4.5.22 firmware and is now happy and is getting better results with 9.4.5.26.

Well,in my case was the other way around,i`ve bought this device with 9.4.5.22 preinstalled and my benchmarks results were better than now with 9.4.5.26 (Antutu was 13.348 and now is 11562) so i wonder why so different results,this devices all have the same hardware.

Anyway,lets try to keep this topic clean and use some guidelines for posting the results,something like this:

Firmware ->> 9.4.5.26 stock or custom roms

CPU mode ->> balanced or performance

Antutu ->> your score

Specify if you are using any tweak

Offcourse you can post any benchmark you want,not only Antutu.Happy benchmarking:D

Inviato dal mio ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T con Tapatalk 2
[Asus Transformer TF700] hit173:
These are my stock results after update.. I/O is flying. I'm downloading a torrent at the moment and I am not having any slow downs at all love my tablet :)
[Asus Transformer TF700] d14b0ll0s:
.26 stock (rooted), tweaks from my thread (see the signature)

balanced & interactive governor = 12431 in AnTuTu

performance & performance governor = 13558 / 13735 in AnTuTu

It's normal that the results will vary based on many factors, but they shouldn't vary TOO MUCH (>10%?).

You can also see some of my RL Benchmark (SQLite performance) results on .26 here.
[Asus Transformer TF700] Keion:
Signature: Going to butthurt ban me? Well go ahead.
[Asus Transformer TF700] mazuka:
Do a cold boot after .26 update

Before a cold boot AnTuTu showed IO at 4xx in Balanced, forgot to test in Performance; I am using "x" for the numbers I do not remember

After a cold boot:

Balanced:

IO is 811, total is 12501

Performance:

IO 822, total is 13517

Not tweaked, not rooted, not unlocked

while being at .21 at the Performance mode IO was 64x and the total was 1350x

while being at .22 at the Performance mode total was 1310x

So looks like .22 was a bit slower than .21 but .26 is better than both at least at IO
[Asus Transformer TF700] lardo5150:
Your benchmarks are the first I have seen beat the HTC and the prime.

For some reason, I keep thinking from all the benchies I have seen over the past week, those two have beat the infinity.

I might be wrong though (usually am).

Anyways, very cool.
[Asus Transformer TF700] timrock:
.26 Stock

Performance
[Asus Transformer TF700] Keion:
Btw, all these were balanced mode.

Signature: Going to butthurt ban me? Well go ahead.
[Asus Transformer TF700] gottahavit:
You're IO is WAY higher than mine on quadrant. Are you using any build.prop tweaks?
[Asus Transformer TF700] Keion:
None but the SIO (or was it CFQ, I can't remember) governor.
[Asus Transformer TF700] gottahavit:
That's very odd, curious to see others. Sio isn't available without tweaks so i'm guessing its cfq which is now the default. But my numbers match yours except you aio is much higher.
[Asus Transformer TF700] urrlyx:
Can you guys post your detailed results from Antutu? I was getting around 13k, but at the moment I'm scoring under 8k. I'm thinking the difference is mostly in the CPU benchmark results since those constitute the highest numbers in the overall score, but it would be nice to be able to compare each area and narrow it down.
[Asus Transformer TF700] tha_kreature:
Wish AnTuTu would get the update out allowing proper path to SD card.

It's scores don't reflect my card but the internal storage...
[Asus Transformer TF700] criodor:
Here is my score:

And
[Asus Transformer TF700] DarsVaeda:
This is nothing of a surprise and the reason why comparing results is pretty much useless.

You can take results as an indicator for problems with your own device (if you have very bad results).

But they are not sufficient to compare with other android devices, not even with other infinity devices.

I have tried some of the benchmarks. Non told me what driver features it used. They did not even mention if they use the multi-core.

Also they do not check what performance mode is set, probably they will never be able to do this. Also users here usually do not mention it.

You can not be sure what apps and tasks run in the background. Does the sql test disable caching?

What firmware version is installed? Do they have the same hardware?

I feel I could go on forever with this.

There are just too many factors you can not control...
[Asus Transformer TF700] d14b0ll0s:
These are I/O schedulers, not CPU governors, a totally different thing.
[Asus Transformer TF700] Pretoriano80:
Benchmark after cold boot

Firmware --> stock 9.4.5.26 - rooted - everything default

Governor -- > interactive

CPU mode --> balanced

RL Benchmark --> first run =58 second run = 74 third run = 68

AnTuTu --> 12514 (CPU=7670,GPU=1318,RAM=2848,I/O=678) first run

12634 (CPU=7649,GPU=1319,RAM=2920,I/O=746) second run

12497 (CPU=4766,GPU=1314,RAM=2913,I/O=804) third run

BTW,i don't worry too much about the benchmarks results and i believe that real life user experience is more accurate.;)
[Asus Transformer TF700] psych2l:
GLBenchmark was updated to version 2.5, the new HD test is pure torture for current devices. Luckily the T33 chip is still on top for most of them ;)

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6121/glbenchmark-25-performance/1
[Asus Transformer TF700] xRevilatioNx:
Read it and weep.. ;)
[Asus Transformer TF700] lardo5150:
HAHAHAHA

Do you know what hte results were before the update?
[Asus Transformer TF700] Hundsbuah:
without data2sd but enabled fsync :)
[Asus Transformer TF700] snypa:
wow! :highfive:
[Asus Transformer TF700] Icharus2:
=D

Running 3.4.1 / Clemsyn 1.5 - 1.8 1450 / disabled fsync

Finally broke the 7k mark!
[Asus Transformer TF700] berfles:
Highest I've gotten while being 100% stable.
[Asus Transformer TF700] yew123:
On H's 1.8.4 kernel (1.3-1.85), performance mode, fsync disabled, cross breeder entropy patch, Smartassv2/vr.
[Asus Transformer TF700] yew123:
This time with that's stock kernel v4, fsync disabled, interactive/row
[Asus Transformer TF700] d14b0ll0s:
Try switching forced 2D (GPU) rendering in system settings OFF.
[Asus Transformer TF700] urrlyx:
That was exactly it. I had already wiped everything, reflashed and retested at 13495. I just re-enabled forced 2D hardware rendering and the scores dropped right back down. For some reason I thought I had tested with it on before and didn't see a drop. I must have been toggling something else. Thanks for the reminder!

It's interesting that 2D and 3D performance are unaffected by changing that setting, while the CPU and RAM performance supposedly drops. I'm not putting a lot of stock in the results, but it's nice to know what the cause here was.

Ciq, Perf, Perf, No forced 2D hardware rendering:

Ciq, Perf, Perf, Forced 2D hardware rendering:
[Asus Transformer TF700] xRevilatioNx:
So you would say deactivating 2D rendering is beneficial? And won't effect anything? Can you notice the improved Ram & CPU while you're tinkering around?
[Asus Transformer TF700] urrlyx:
Screen redraw in some applications is ridiculously clunky with forced 2D hardware rendering disabled. I tend to think this is the fault (choice?) of the app since other apps are smooth as butter. Does using the GPU for 2D rendering use more or less power than not using it?

I haven't personally noticed a slowdown in CPU performance with it enabled, though it does cause some apps to malfunction.
[Asus Transformer TF700] Pretoriano80:
I, ve did some testing with AndroBench and the results made me laugh (and cry)... :D

As you can see random writing is so low that the results bar was almost empty for our device.
[Asus Transformer TF700] Pretoriano80:
Anyone tested AndroBench? I'm curios if you guys will get the same result.
[Asus Transformer TF700] NCRoadster:
Are you running the latest TF700 update?
[Asus Transformer TF700] urrlyx:
I did yesterday after reading your post. I am on .26 with cfq scheduler selected and got pretty much the exact same results. Really sad.

From what I've read it's a limitation of the flash storage in our devices so there may not be much that can be done about it other than mask it with some good software engineering.

edit: fixed spelling of cfq. durrrr.
[Asus Transformer TF700] Pretoriano80:
Yes i also agree that it has anything to do with the scheduler this time, is just poor hardware imo. Also i'm wondering what Asus have to say about this "top quality" hardware they used for building a not so cheap device.

Even a 5 years old device can do better than that... i guess.
[Asus Transformer TF700] zeus34:
Zeus34
[Asus Transformer TF700] tbogunro:
Wow!
[Asus Transformer TF700] zeus34:
Zeus Beta 2.4
[Asus Transformer TF700] tbogunro:
Did you do some kernel changes to make it that fast?
[Asus Transformer TF700] d14b0ll0s:
It's Zeus's own ROM. He's been doing some great development based on the stock firmware, which you can see in this thread, but with all due respect this is only a 4% increase in the benchmarks, so "that fast" is quite an exaggeration ;)
[Asus Transformer TF700] Pretoriano80:
I'm using his latest rom (2.1) and for me Quadrant score is 4750 (- 1000 compared to zeus34) so is somewhere around 20% increase compared with my score.Also he scored + 2000 in I/O test (mine is 3500)...so it is quiet impresive imo.
[Asus Transformer TF700] d14b0ll0s:
Which I/O test do you have in mind?
[Asus Transformer TF700] Pretoriano80:
The one from Quadrant.Look at the screenshot from zeus34 and zoom in ,at the bottom you will see the score for each test (I/O is green).
[Asus Transformer TF700] d14b0ll0s:
Oh, OK. I've stopped using Quadrant a while ago after some really bad press it began to get for not showing relevant results.

Wonder what they test in this I/O test, probably SQLite performance and sequential R/W speeds, which can be done in many other tests and so far most of them seem to be more or less the same for various users here.
[Asus Transformer TF700] Pretoriano80:
Yes,my guess is also that is testing only sequential like most benchmark apps.Too bad zeus34 didn't posted a detailed score of Antutu or even better an AndroBench score.
[Asus Transformer TF700] zeus34:
More Detail Antutu And new HighScore Quadrant (Force Gpu rendering)
[Asus Transformer TF700] urrlyx:
Zeus so when are you releasing the latest version of your rom? ;)
[Asus Transformer TF700] markbraggs:
On .26 firmware, 2D rendering off and on...got just about the same score on Antutu both times.

...7281. Why so low? :(
[Asus Transformer TF700] d14b0ll0s:
Thanks for details zeus34, it seems the I/O results are pretty much the same everywhere, but I wouldn't expect it to be anything different before a new kernel or modules, so well done anyway, BUT, GUYS, don't trust AnTuTu in the I/O part, the sample is too small to be accurate, which makes it pretty much random on a device suffering from hiccups, try sth like SD Card Tester (it comes with a customisable path).
[Asus Transformer TF700] jtrosky:
You guys are putting way too much stock into these benchmark scores. All that really matters if the device is fast enough for what you are doing.

It's been proven time and time again that higher benchmarks do *not* mean higher end-user performance!
[Asus Transformer TF700] zeus34:
In any case, the test programs do not tell all the truth. best test is the user's own experience.
[Asus Transformer TF700] Pretoriano80:
I have to agree with you and disagree at the same time. I agree when you say benchmarks are not real life performance and disagree when you say higher benchmark scores doesn't mean a high profile device.

Many users said that moving partitions to external card is not the way but judging by the results i got from SD Card Tester is the opposite. My old Lexar 8 GB Class 4 MicroSd card is faster than Infinity's internal memory so imagine the results you would have with a high performance Class 10 card. I will post some screenshots and maybe i will go buy a class 10 card too so we can se how Infinity perform against that.

UPDATE : SD Card tester results

Rom - Zeus 2.1 (zeus34 still waiting for 2.2 :D)

Power mode - balanced

Internal Card - 64 gb

MicroSD - Lexar 8gb Class4
[Asus Transformer TF700] d14b0ll0s:
Also, try a 1GB file at least, 300MB won't be anywhere near accurate (sorry to be a Spielverberder, as Germans call those who put an end to good fun).
[Asus Transformer TF700] Pretoriano80:
No reason to be sorry mate we are all here to share experiences and also to learn more so every comment is welcome here ;) And now here's more results (still not very accurate imo because i only have this 8gb MicroSD wich is to small for large file testing) :
[Asus Transformer TF700] tha_kreature:
Agree. TF700T has too much memory to run a test shorter than 1 GB.

It will/can cache most of it causing a skewed score.
[Asus Transformer TF700] d14b0ll0s:
I have quite the same results (.26, cfq), with a 2111 MB sample I got 11.99MB/s write & 18.20 MB/s read on the internal memory, and on the MicroSD (ADATA 32GB class 10 SDHC, non-UHS) I got a bootloop again with this program, probably because of the exFAT ;) I don't want to try again now, but before it showed me 16.28 MB/s write & 17.76 MB/s read. I don't think we're getting much above these with a standard setting, until a new kernel comes in.
[Asus Transformer TF700] urrlyx:
Oh I don't, I just want to try Zeus's ROM, but would rather wait till he does the next release.
[Asus Transformer TF700] zeus34:
Zeus
[Asus Transformer TF700] d14b0ll0s:
Now that's some improvement! How do you think, what's the main reason?
[Asus Transformer TF700] zeus34:
Zeus 2.3
[Asus Transformer TF700] Pretoriano80:
Zeus i don't know what kind of magic you are doing there but you should tell Asus about it. :D
[Asus Transformer TF700] d14b0ll0s:
Zeus, if you further ignore my questions, I will imply you don't know what's the magic yourself ;) (just kiddin')
[Asus Transformer TF700] urrlyx:
Here are some interesting results. I was running Androbench on my SGS2 and got the same results for random write on the internal storage. This highlights the fact that you can't really rely on benchmarks when determining what actual user experience is going to be like. So then I started testing with different file sizes as well as the random buffer size. It does possibly give some insight as to what can be done to improve the situation.

The defaults are 2MB file size for write and a 4k random read/write buffer, and we've been seeing ~200kB/s random write and 40-50 iops.

This is with a 1MB file size and a 16k buffer:

This is with a 2MB file size and a 32k buffer:

~2MB/s is a hell of a lot better than 200kB/s. Do you guys think this is something achievable or just a result that can only be synthesized in this type of benchmark? Does Android have an i/o buffer like this that can be modified?
[Asus Transformer TF700] zeus34:
sorry, when I answered the question. I've made ​​some changes. but also the stability worsens

I try release next rom 2-3 days.

Zeus
[Asus Transformer TF700] andyk11:
I have tested all the roms and differant kernal combinations out there for the tf700 so far. Tried everything more than twice in some cases. For me i/o has not and can't be increased on software changes by themselfs. The only thing I see happening to increase the i/o is better hardware which of course won't happen for this device without getting inside which most of us can't and won't do so the way I see it... this is all we're going to get. I haven't and won't post my screen shoot here but I got 13545 antutu and 5807 in quadrant. I can't get to the 14000+ and 6000+ with all the tweaks I have made. To many to list. Maybe in the next Tranformer upgrade.
[Asus Transformer TF700] Pretoriano80:
Indeed,most custom roms are using some workarounds in order to improve the I/O performance a bit ,but the I/O raw performace will remain pretty much the same .Even with the CleanRom 2.3 the I/O performance is same as stock or CM10 ,just use Androbench to test it.Quadrant scores great on that rom but i don't trust that app.
[Asus Transformer TF700] SteveG12543:
Running CleanROM 2.3, Clemsyns latest kernel at 1.8GHz and on Performance mode.
[Asus Transformer TF700] danger-rat:
What are you using to overclock?

I'm running CleanROM 2.3 with clemsyns ver22, and my quadrant scores have dropped significantly. Doesn't look like I'm getting over 1400 mhz for the CPU. Tried with Set CPU and CPU Master, with same results...

Mind sharing how you set up?
[Asus Transformer TF700] ExjeetzZ:
Quiet interesting...

I'm using CleanROM 2.3, Clemsyns latest kernel at 1.8GHz and on Performance mode, Everything else is the way it always been :)
[Asus Transformer TF700] hit173:
That's all
[Asus Transformer TF700] ExjeetzZ:
Noob :(

Only if i knew how to view attachments, Shame that i can't even view my own attachments. lol
[Asus Transformer TF700] SteveG12543:
All I had to do was set the tab to Performance mode after I flashed his kernel and it was OC'd. I checked System Tuner Pro and it said the CPU was indeed maxing at 1.8GHz. Not sure why your processor isn't going over 1.4...
[Asus Transformer TF700] hit173:
My score was 6360 on Quadrant and i have on sunspider 817.38ms
[Asus Transformer TF700] dan.kels.r:
word on the street is his bootloader probably isnt updated to the jellybean bootloader. see scroslers thread for flashing to stock jellybean, then recovery and custom rom
[Asus Transformer TF700] Pretoriano80:
CleanRom 2.3 + ClemsynKernel v.22 + Data2Sd ( Sandisk Ultra 32GB Class 10 ,UHS 1 )

Sequential Write sucks with Androbench but it's ok with other benchmark tools.
[Asus Transformer TF700] BarryH_GEG:
You guys might find this interesting. GSMArena benchmarked the Teg3 One X JB update against the ICS Teg 3 One X and other devices. The gains were consistant across the board and pretty remarkable so any issues with the TF700 JB update would seem unrelated to Teg3 by itself.

"The Jelly Bean-running HTC One X gets ahead of a Jelly Bean-running Samsung Galaxy S III, at least in these benchmarks, and makes it very competitive with the LG Optimus G (which has a next-gen Snapdragon S4 Pro chipset but ICS is keeping it back)."

http://m.gsmarena.com/jelly_bean_update_for_htc_one_x_boosts_performance-news-5010.php
[Asus Transformer TF700] Pretoriano80:
Here's another benchmark, this time it scored big time. :D
[Asus Transformer TF700] Thats OK:
Cheezus!

That's the highest IO I've ever seen!
[Asus Transformer TF700] BarryH_GEG:
Then brace yourself. Stock Teg3 One X running the JB update.
[Asus Transformer TF700] Thats OK:
OK ok we have a new winner LOL