yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC One S] Sevenarth:
I decided, and now I got 2.21.401.10 :laugh:

I follow this steps: (thanks addsfsds)

1. Unlock, install recovery mod, root --> HOW-TO

2. Changed CID to generic (HTC__001) --> HOW-TO

3. Relocked bootloader (It's important!) --> Command: "fastboot oem lock"

4. Installed 2.21 HTC Europe RUU (includes stock recovery + stock rom) --> DOWNLOAD

5. I'm free!
[HTC One S] ShensMobile:
You guys are saying you don't want to change your CID until S-Off is out because you don't want to unlock bootloader... Even if S-Off is out, you still have to unlock your bootloader to change CID *facepalm*
[HTC One S] Sevenarth:
So I needed the best choice, because I need europe stock rom now.
[HTC One S] usaff22:
Don't facepalm without knowing. We don't want to unlock the bootloader now because once we get S-OFF, we can S-ON back again with no traces of being S-OFF'ed. However, with HTCDev, it says ***RELOCKED*** which is a clear indication that the device has had its bootloader unlocked before. Some of use don't like to void our warranties, which is why we're waiting for S-OFF.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] tsk5:
This morning, my Skyrocket overheated while charging. I can't connect anything to the usb port without frying the chord. It looks like I will have to take it back to AT&T, but I'm worried they won't do anything because it's rooted with a custom rom. Is there a way to restore stock without odin?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] vincom:
goto the first link in my sig there cwm flashable stock firmwares, but dont think they have the stock recovery
[Off-topic] 300k:
So, I had a local deal in trading my HTC Rezound for a Razr Maxx. We kept in contact via text. The trade was my Rezound for the Maxx. Then I was asked what accessories it came with, so I told them it came with screen protector , and they asked, "if you get an extended battery, you got a deal ."

So I said ok to getting the extended battery and ordered it the same day. Took about 4days to get to my house. I contact the person saying I received the extended battery and asked when we could meet. We agreed on the upcoming Saturday. Saturday comes, and the person asks if we can meet around noon , I said ok.

About 15mins later I receive a text saying the deal is canceled as the person is giving it to their father. So I say ok. I check Craigslist about 20 mins later and find the same person selling it. I emailed the person asking for a trade to make sure it was them. Same email, same location, and same number. My conclusion, I was lied to.

I don't have a problem if they decide not to do the trade, but don't say you're gonna do the trade, have me buy an expensive item, then lie to me about not wanting to the trade by saying you're giving it to your dad. Just don't blatantly lie to me that you're nit interested in the trade. The fact that they lied is more of why I'm pissed.

Was I wrong to be too trusting? Maybe.

Anyways, thanks for reading :)

Comment if you wish.
[Off-topic] 063_XOBX:
Might want to post something like this here in the future. Just saying, since it might be closed since that thread exists already.

That said it's awful that they flaked on you like that but CList isn't the most reliable place since there are no consequences for backing out on a deal. Maybe try the trades section of the XDA marketplace.
[Off-topic] 300k:
Hmm....i looked but apparently I'm blind as i didnt see the rant thread. Wonder if they could move it or if ill have to re-write it.

Thanks for telling me.
[Off-topic] prototype7:
Just copy/paste it, less work for the mods that way, then this can just be locked.
[Off-topic] 300k:
For a pc literate guy like me, I should remember the copy and paste
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] diablo900t:
Hey guys total noob here to android and flashing ROMs. I rooted my phone and flashed to TuchMi S3X 5.0. First installed 3.0, then went to 5.0. In both builds, my SD card wouldn't mount, i'd get a message saying "Preparing SD card" in the notification bar, then "SD card is safe to remove." When attemping to mount through Settings, nothing happens, and I can't mount in recovery either.

I've tried reformatting every which way I can think of, but still no luck. The same card worked fine in stock.

Any tips? I've searched all over the place but couldn't find anything pertaining to TuchMi S3X and external SD cards not mounting.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] diablo900t:
So i've determined that the issue is with the exFAT file system. If I format the card in FAT32 it works fine, but this is a 64GB card, and I want to use exFAT.

If i let the phone format the SD card when it is unformatted, it uses exFAT but the card STILL isn't able to be mounted...do I need a custom kernel or something?
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] xThe Enforcer:
So bottom line the card still showed 64GB and worked as long as it was FAT32?
[Xperia Arc General] pingulii:
I have arc s , white, and it has a crack...so saaad:crying:
[Xperia Arc General] pingulii:
actually, it is on front of my cellphone over sensor and blow it
[Xperia Arc General] pingulii:
i will put my arcs pic in here
[Xperia Arc General] pingulii:
is there any body having this issue before?
[Xperia Arc General] pingulii:
anyone?????
[Xperia Arc General] pingulii:
maybe it just me
[Xperia Arc General] netorino:
Check here

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1144774
[Xperia Arc General] huntedsoul:
Its not just u mate, that a known issue :)
[Android General] NicholasQ:
First off, I searched the forums to see if anybody has really discussed what seems to be a one-sided trial and I haven't really found anything. So I ask this question because I am a little confused on the matter...

If you have been following the news lately, you would see that the samsung vs. apple case has begun. Barely two days into it samsung releases evidence of designs that predate the iphone which look kind of similar. Apparently this "key" evidence was rejected by Judge Koh on the basis that it is irrelevant. You can google search the facts about this but here is one link http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2407919,00.asp

Now, I am no legal expert and just taking a quick glance and seeing the evidence and hearing that it was rejected by the judge makes no sense right now. It angered me to think that samsung wasn't given a fair chance to provide evidence that seems clearly relevant to why this whole trial is even taking place. But I figured I should withhold judgment until I learn all the facts because like I said, I am no expert on legal matters and I know there is two sides of the story.

My question is, is there a good reason as to why the judge threw evidence out like this? A lot of people are claiming the judge is being payed by apple but I'm not going to quickly jump to that conclusion. I am wondering if there are any fellow xda people out there that have some experience in law or know a lot about this case and can elaborate as to why this has happened. I want to know if it is unfair to jump to the assumption that apple is somehow pulling strings behind the scenes.

I'd prefer people with a decent amount of knowledge in this case speak up and not people who have read a few articles and think they know all about it.

If it's one thing I'm really starting to learn, it's that all these tech sites seem to have a bias towards them. I see some sites blatantly ignoring and even sometimes lying about android and it's features, usabillity, etc. So I'd rather get advice, experience, opinions from people who at least know what they're talking about.

Update Now Apple is asking for judge to punish samsung for releasing public documents to the press

http://www.computerworld.com/s/arti...amsung_for_releasing_documents_in_iPhone_suit
[Android General] RoadHazard:
I'm pretty sure that evidence was thrown out because it was entered too late by Samsung (there's a cut-off date after which no new evidence may be entered for consideration, since both parties must get some time to go over it and decide how to deal with it).

But yeah, unfortunately I think Samsung is gonna get screwed on this one. Apple seems pretty good at deceiving juries and judges (especially certain ones) into believing that they invented everything in existence. I just hope it doesn't end too badly for Samsung, as their phones are probably the biggest reason why Android has risen up as a viable competitor to iOS (and even raced right past it in market share). The smartphone world needs that competition. I shudder at the thought of a world where the only real choice is getting an iPhone.
[Android General] NicholasQ:
Ahhh, I see. Well that makes sense if it there's a deadline and they didn't make it. I will say that I find it pretty strange that they didn't make the deadline with evidence that seems to be pretty damn important.
[Android General] MissionImprobable:
There are time limits, thought it can still be allowed if it wasn't discovered quickly enough to be submitted. Regardless, every decision made seems to point to clear bias on the point of Koh and higher judges. I've yet to see anything fair and impartial about what's been going on with any of this from the beginning.
[Android General] NicholasQ:
Worst case scenario... Apple wins. And also gets to enforce the recent touchscreen patents they were awarded. What does this mean for android? That's what I'm wondering. Although, I really hope this doesn't happen.
[Android General] RoadHazard:
Yeah... Richard Posner seems to be one of the only sensible ones. Quoting The Guardian:

Apple is being silly, and this guy seems to be the only judge who gets that.
[Android General] RoadHazard:
Yeah, if they actually manage to ruin Android (I don't believe they will), I'll go for a Windows Phone a million times before I even look at an iPhone. I never used to actively dislike Apple, I just wasn't very interested in their products, but recently they've really made me think they're a ****ty anti-competitive company that doesn't deserve a cent of my money. I truly hate what they're trying to do to the smartphone market.
[Android General] NicholasQ:
I've kind of feel the same. I never really liked apple, although I know they make good products. After lots of research and hands on experience, I've realized iOS sucks compared to android. All it has is smoothness. Android has far more features and is simpler to use in my opinion. What apple really is good at is hype. After all these lawsuits with them suing everybody for what seems like ridiculous things, it's making me really hate the company now.
[Android General] Pekempy:
Free iPhones, iPads and Macbooks for the judges, it seems!
[Android General] DD-Ripper:
Yup...maybe they bribed the judges with free new Apple products :mad::mad:
[Android General] Just Another★Gamer:
I wonder why Samsung doesn't try the same thing, if I got some of those new Galaxy products for free I would want Samsung to win.
[Android General] DD-Ripper:
Because Samsung has some respect which Apple dont have. Thats why Apple is playing such cheap games on Samsung.
[Android General] mistermentality:
I should point out, in the interests of fairness, that despite many of our suspicions regarding bribery or illicit deals there has never been the slightest evidence apple have bought legal rulings by anything other than legitimate and transparent means.

Dave

( http://www.google.com/producer/editions/CAownKXmAQ/bigfatuniverse )
[Android General] Hell Guardian:
Am i the only one that thinks that the judges are acting like that because apple is considered "All american and genuine" company to them and Samsung is an invading country that want to knock off the "GREAT" american company?

From my experience there are people that are dumb enough to act like that....
[Android General] ingenious247:
This thought has passed through my mind to be honest

However I don't think any of this is as simple as "Apple is American" or "bribery".

It's a broken patent system that Apple is using to try and prolong the inevitable - which is Android taking over the majority of the market for what could be decades. Apple is within their rights to attempt to use their patent portfolio to slow down the competition. This is not debatable. They are using legal means and the current system to attempt to enforce their dominance since they can no longer maintain it with product alone.

Although I am a Samsung fan and a huge supporter of Linux, Android, Google, etc. I cannot get past the picture of the Galaxy SII next to the iPhone. Side by side, it does look like they ripped them off. That is where I believe Samsung screwed up. It's not the functionality/UI patents that are troubling to me, it's the fact they made it look like the iPhone. It's almost undeniable. They encroached on brand recognition, to the point that you can't deny they look very similar. Too similar.

In my opinion, that will be the cause of Samsung's defeat. Everyone says "you can't patent rectangles or the color spectrum". But you can't rip off someone's design either. And they did, pretty plainly IMO. Why do you think there are no Black GSIII's? Samsung knows what they did, and they didn't want to risk it with their new flagship.

As far as software patents, Apply can kiss my ass. But they have the right for their product to look unique. No matter who designed something similar back in the day. No one sees a black, rectangular phone with a huge slab of glass and says "hey, that's that Sony phone prototype!". But any average person, even an elderly person who doesn't much follow tech, definitely recognize an iPhone. Unless of course, it's next to a black Galaxy SII.

Just my two cents.
[Android General] mistermentality:
Samsung didn't copy the iphone though, they actually had iphone like designs the year before iphone was made public.

Are you saying that because apple used that design in public first, even though samsung had a very similar one earlier, that apple should be only one able to have anything similar "no matter who designed something similar back in the day"?

Dave

( http://www.google.com/producer/editions/CAownKXmAQ/bigfatuniverse )
[Android General] ingenious247:
It's the phone itself in combination with the dock, square icons, general "appearance" I'm taking about. I'm sorry but it's really not debatable. It looks like a foreign clone of an iPhone.

Sent from the current Heavy Weight champ GALAXY SIII
[Android General] MissionImprobable:
If worse comes to worst you know we'll just all switch to buying Chinese android devices. The Chinese system not only ignores Apple's chicanery, but has ruled in favor of several plaintiffs against Apple and allows the phones that truly are copies to be sold freely. I don't in any way foresee it coming to that but it will be a long, long time before Apple ever sees dollar one of my money and I will do whatever I can to keep an Android device in my hands.

Brought to you by the letters "M" "I" "U" "I"
[Android General] got556:
You're not getting this. Samsung has shown (to the best of my knowledge the evidence that was tossed by Judge Koh, was legit from Samsung), that they had prior art to this style of design, the apps, the home button, the rounded corners, well before Apple ever went public with the iPhone.
[Android General] mistermentality:
So even though samsung had that design the year before iphone, they shouldn't be allowed to use it?

Where do we draw a line on looks then....should every tv, car, games controller, building, etcetera not also be totally different to any other?

Would you say apples ipad should not look like microsofts 2002 tablet?

Things have a look that's similar, it is how things always have been. Cars didn't always have accelerator brake etc on bottom for example, computers didn't always have a gui, and so on...but they do now.

Dave

( http://www.google.com/producer/editions/CAownKXmAQ/bigfatuniverse )
[Android General] esist:
Precisely the problem. Apple wants a different set of criteria to apply to the markets it dominates than those it doesn't. I mean Apple TV looks like plenty of other set-top boxes that came before it, does it not?

Did a version of OS X's inclusion of window shadows and increased use of transparency not have a possible source of "inspiration"? ([cough]Vista [cough]).

Apple, regardless of the merits of the case, are behaving anticompetitively. Microsoft has at several times been forced to open up APIs, or share source code because, even though they are within their rights not to, allowing Microsoft to keep them closed would be anticompetitive.

Even if Apple is in the right (it isn't), it still should have no way of enforcing it.

The problem is no government in the world seems be noticing that Apple is the dominant smartphone tablet player, doing absolutely everything it can to prevent having any viable competition, which is clearly unacceptable.
[Android General] 063_XOBX:
Samsung submitted the evidence late. There is a procedure to submitting evidence or else they would just wait till the very last day and throw buckets of evidence that the other sides lawyers could never refute.
[Android General] mistermentality:
As I understood it the evidence was submitted in time but then samsung wanted to use it for more than one part of the case and judge said no because they hadn't specified it earlier?

Still seems odd though, after all it is simply pictures of pre iphone designs so how would apple disprove them even if they had more time?

But you make a good point.

Dave

( http://www.google.com/producer/editions/CAownKXmAQ/bigfatuniverse )
[Android General] 063_XOBX:
The way the case if being reported, Samsung waited till after the disclosure period to try and submit slides of evidence. Once the disclosure period is over it's at the judge's discretion whether it can be used as evidence or not.
[Android General] LouRock:
Interesting read. I surely hope Samsung prevails in this matter.. ;)
[Android General] NicholasQ:
I think it's very important they win
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] harjeetgrover:
Hello,

I have a HTC desire HD with rooted IceCold Sandwich 4.0.4 android OS. I want to revert the phone to original state and for that I am using a RUU rom

"RUU_Ace_HTC_WWE_1.32.405.3_Radio_12.28b.60.140e_26.03.02.15_M3_release_155032_signed.exe"

.

I am following all the instructions given by XDA forum correctly and data cable is also connected properly (as USB storage is working perfectly after connection), but unfortunately everytime I try to revert to Stock RUU, I get an error "ERROR[170]: USB CONNECTION ERROR".

For diagnosis purpose, I tried downloading another RUU stock rom and followed the same instruction. Now also same error appears.

There are few issues I am facing in my rooted rom and hence I want to revert to stock rom. But always a failure :(

I request you to please help me as to how I can manage installing stock rom which can connect with PC.

Waiting for a favorable reply.

Thanks,

Harry
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Andy:
You downloaded and installed HTC Sync for the correct USB Drivers?
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] harjeetgrover:
Problem Still There.. No Resolution Yet !! XDA Challenge for you Guys....

Yes Andy, I have latest version of HTC Sync for my DHD. Version = 3.2.20

Anyone here who can help me to get rid of this issue.. Please Please.. Its been 2 days my DHD is in power off state.. I need the resolution to awake my DHD.. :crying:
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Andy:
Did you unlock using HTC's Bootloader unlock program or did you use any tool found here on XDA?

If you used HTCs system you will need to relock the bootloader before you can flash any RUU's.

If you can get into fastboot try these commands

fastboot oem lock

Then try to run the RUU.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mappyman:
Is there any other way to relock the bootloader? I'm having the same issue with the latest HTC Sync Manager installed.

EDIT: Thanks., Locking it via fastboot and running RUU in that mode got past the 170!
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mutnat:
Hey guys, sorry if this is a repeat topic. I searched and didn't find anything useful.

So I use Google Reader to keep up with several RSS feeds. Some feed items, I like to click-through and open up in the browser to read the whole article/posting. In the old Android browser in 3.x and 4.0, I could click through and open several articles up in several tabs from Reader, and go back later to read them, each in its own tab. Under Chrome in 4.0 on my old Transformer, and in 4.1 on this Nexus, it seems to like to replace an existing tab when I do that.

So, I go to say the Engadget feed in Reader, I find an interesting article, and click through to open it in Chrome. I then switch back to Reader, find another interesting Engadget article, and click it to open in the browser. Instead of opening a new tab as before, Chrome seems to replace the Engadget tab I had open with the new one I just clicked through. The back button isn't enabled so it hasn't simply opened the article on top. And the old tab is nowhere to be found.

Is anyone else having this issue? Is there something I can do to make it open a new tab and not kill off the old one?

Thanks! :confused:
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AZImmortal:
I'm experiencing the same issue, although I normally use Dolphin HD, which doesn't have this problem. Seems like it's a Chrome issue.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mutnat:
So, nobody has a fix or workaround other than to use a different browser? :(
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AZImmortal:
I think you'd need to bring it up directly with the Chrome devs (I'm not sure if they have a way of submitting comments/suggestions). It doesn't seem like a behavior that can be changed with any type of workaround other than an inherent change in Chrome.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mutnat:
Actually I don't think Chrome is the issue--Ironically it's another Google product: Google Reader. I bought and switched to Reader HD, and it opens up a new tab for every article I send to Chrome (via the "View Original" button at the end of an aritcle in Reader HD). Worth trying, and it's only a couple of bucks.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] pakakid:
any help??
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] gr4p3s:
As for the LED, that's a known problem. Samsung screwed some things up and the creator of Light Flow is working on a fix. I believe that CM9 and CM10 don't have this problem?
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] InversedTech:
The LED notifications in CM9 are actually pretty derpy at the moment.

When I was on stock, Google Voice would leave the LED on until I read my text or cleared the notification, and CM9 does the same thing too.

When I get an SMS through my regular phone number, sometimes the LED flashes, and sometimes it doesn't, it all depends.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] pakakid:
Okay thanks for the light situation, what about the build versions? Does your match?
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] xxjrsmith3xx:
I see lots of people have a LED problem , I haven't even experience a problem one.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] iGoOsE76:
mine is same as yours. I noticed that because on my second gs3 on the box and on the plastic when you first open the case it had a stick that said UPDATED. the original one that I got in the store just had the normal $50 restocking fee sticker. the first phone i got from the store does have a different build number from the one I got from customer service online. I just thought it was because the one I picked up at the store was a 16GB and the one I ordered online was 32gb... but that shouldn't matter the build number should all still be the same right??
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] gr4p3s:
If you get a text or email, led should work fine. But if you use gosms or Facebook, the led doesn't blink and also uses the wrong colors. That doesn't happen to you?
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] iGoOsE76:
So from what I've gathered up online is that the ones that have the updated sticker has the update more for radio then anything else I do seem to have a lot better signal and data speed then the 16Gb GS3. So I guess everyone with the old build will get an update soon.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] :
Does the slider status bar work if auto brightness is off?