yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC Incredible S] Alex-stroev:
Спасибо, сейчас подумаю как можно добавить

Now i am thinking how can i release this feature!
[HTC Incredible S] SandySemenov:
You're welcome! ;)

Best wishes,

Sandy Semenov
[HTC Incredible S] tpbklake:
You can use the fastboot getvar command to get the CID. Check the output of

Fastboot getvar all

to check for other values that might be appropriate to help user determine which RUU would be useful.
[HTC Incredible S] Alex-stroev:
I also add this command!

You can download ftom narod.ru

Отправлено из моего GT-I9100
[HTC Incredible S] mohitgalaxy3:
I want you to Integrate the complete method to make our phone stock one so that we can get warranty.

Like: Revert from blackrose/revolutionary to stock hboot 2.00 and stock rom.
[HTC Incredible S] Alex-stroev:
For faster reverting to stock I install ENG hboot and after that install RUU. And after all those steps I have s-on

You want to install s-on hboot before installing RUU?
[HTC Incredible S] mohitgalaxy3:
Yup, that will be the best and hassle free solution.

Thanks in advance.
[HTC Incredible S] Alex-stroev:
New version is ready!

I added "FAQ"
[HTC Incredible S] Alex-stroev:
Add download miror on dropbox
[HTC Incredible S] Alex-stroev:
Hello, today i find bug. Please don't use downgrade for android 4.0 In new version i fix it but i can post it after then my friend from russian wiil translate bat to Russian language

Sorry for this!!!
[HTC Incredible S] Alex-stroev:
Hello, today I post new version. I fix downdgrade.

Sorry Russian language not ready yet.
[HTC Incredible S] mr_trisx:
blackrose 2.02 working flawlessly? downloading now. will give update on ur new version :)
[HTC Incredible S] Alex-stroev:
Yeah, a lot of people from 4pda using my programe for install black rose 2.00 and 2.02
[HTC Incredible S] anonymousss:
Can I flash ext4 touch recovery over cwm v5 ?
[HTC Incredible S] Alex-stroev:
Yes, you can

My programme use adb and fastboot

Отправлено из моего GT-I9100
[HTC Incredible S] alex_awful:
is there a guide / instraction how to work with the tool? requirements etc

many thx!
[HTC Incredible S] Alex-stroev:
Прочитай FAQ

Я специально добавил его в прогу. Русского нет так как pitoff еще не перевел....
[HTC Rezound] krelvinaz:
Posted to FCC.gov

http://www.fcc.gov/document/verizon-wireless-pay-125-million-settle-investigation

VERIZON WIRELESS TO PAY $1.25 MILLION TO SETTLE INVESTIGATION

INTO BLOCKING OF CONSUMERS’ ACCESS TO CERTAIN MOBILE BROADBAND

Today the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau released a $1.25 million consent decree with Verizon Wireless that resolves an investigation into whether the company had fully complied with the FCC’s “C Block rules,” requiring licensees of C Block spectrum to allow customers to freely use the devices and applications of their choosing.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said, “Today’s action demonstrates that compliance with FCC obligations is not optional. The open device and application obligations were core conditions when Verizon purchased the C-block spectrum. The massive innovation and investment fueled by the Internet have been driven by consumer choice in both devices and applications. The steps taken today will not only protect consumer choice, but defend certainty for innovators to continue to deliver new services and

apps without fear of being blocked.”

Verizon Wireless offers customers its 4G LTE service on C Block spectrum. Verizon Wireless bid at auction to acquire that spectrum, understanding that it was accompanied by open device and application obligations. Specifically, licensees offering service on C Block spectrum “shall not deny, limit, or restrict

the ability of their customers to use the devices and applications of their choice on the licensee’s C Block network,” subject to narrow exceptions.

P. Michele Ellison, Enforcement Bureau Chief, said, “This case was the first of its kind in enforcing the pro-consumer open access obligations of the C Block rules. It underscores the agency’s commitment to guarantee consumers the benefits of an open wireless broadband platform by providing greater consumer choice and fostering innovation.”

The Bureau launched an investigation after reports suggested that Verizon Wireless had successfully requested that a major application store operator block Verizon’s customers from accessing tethering applications from its online market. (“Tethering” is using a wireless phone as a modem to obtain Internet

access for another device, such as a laptop computer or tablet.)

The Commission also received an informal complaint alleging that Verizon Wireless had violated the FCC’s C Block rules by making such a request. At that time, Verizon Wireless’s terms of service required all customers who wanted to use their phones for tethering to subscribe to the company’s Mobile Broadband Connect service, at an additional charge. In response, Verizon Wireless stated that the additional fee reflected the fact that customers who tether laptops or other devices have the capability to use more data capacity than others. At the time of that response, however, Verizon Wireless required not only unlimited data plan customers, but also customers who paid for data on a usage basis, to pay the additional fee. Verizon Wireless asserted that third-party tethering applications could enable its customers to tether without paying an additional fee.
[HTC Rezound] sshaar:
So those of us on unlimited are not affected by this change. Looks like if you're unlimited (like myself), you either fork up the monthly tethering fee, or root/use 3rd party app.
[HTC Rezound] kzoodroid:
All it means is that Verizon has to stop blocking tethering apps in the market and thats it.
[HTC Rezound] krelvinaz:
From my reading, they can't charge for tethering period regardless of what plan you are on. that is in addition to the usage based plans.
[HTC Rezound] kiint:
Oh yeah, I'm sure they'll get right on that...
[HTC Rezound] k_flan:
Locked boot loaders is a bigger violation IMO
[HTC Rezound] blestsol:
Thats what I got from that but I was colin powelling.
[HTC Rezound] scy1192:
I tethered before it was legal. /hipster
[HTC Rezound] Morpheus991:
Maybe this had something to do with the end of unlimited data?
[HTC Rezound] killahrey:
Lmfao. You sir win 1 internet.
[HTC Rezound] carngeX:
But now it's mainstream :(
[HTC Rezound] zone23:
Looks like Verizon owes me $20 bucks for that one month I used Hotspot I'll be watching the mail...
[HTC Rezound] kzoodroid:
Its doesn't say that at all, its talking about blocking applications and by that they mean Verizon's blocking of the tethering apps in the Martket. Its on just about every tech website as such.

http://www.droid-life.com/2012/07/3...ng-apps-please-pay-1-25-million-to-say-sorry/

http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/0...ng-tethering-apps-via-block-c-spectrum-rules/

http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/31/verizon-to-stop-blocking-tethering-apps-settles-with-fcc-for-1/
[HTC Rezound] carm01:
Its about time this happened. I am hoping this is the first positive step in preventing carriers from locking out devices down. I guess one could also say this applies to custom ROMS and rooting as well...IMO :good:
[HTC Rezound] mike.s:
You've already been affected. If you want to keep unlimited, no more $500/2 year phone subsidy, which basically cancels out the tethering fee. It's not like VZW didn't know this was coming. Of course, no new unlimited contracts, either.

This consent decree is pretty much meaningless - it simply forced VZW to eliminate unlimited smartphone plans and to find a way to extract an extra $20/month from those who still have them. Net/net, customers are worse off.

You can thank all the reprobates who violated their contracts and tethered 50GB per month for that.
[HTC Rezound] nosympathy:
There is nothing that says they have to unlock the bootloader.

What it does say: if a company decides to sell you a phone for Verizon that has an unlocked boot loader, Verizon cannot stop them.

If Verizon asks them to lock the boot loader and the company agrees and does, that is their choice. Just like if HTC said all Verizon phones will come s-off Verizon has to allow it. Only thing Verizon can do is stop selling htc phones. Which would be stupid on their part.
[HTC Rezound] k_flan:
Can Verizon request a company to lock down the bootloader, like the gs3? To me, it would be Verizon blocking you from loading software.
[HTC Rezound] sr71pav:
The way I read it, Verizon can't stop a company, let's call it "Google" from offering a device which we shall call "Nexus" for sale, completely unlocked and Verizon must allow that device on their network.
[HTC Rezound] nosympathy:
Yes. They can request this. It just they cannot block you from having a device that is this way. So like they couldn't say because your rezound is s-off that they will have to cut your service.

Or like in the case of the GSIII we have the Verizon version and the. Samsung is releasing a developer version on their website with an unlocked boot loader and Verizon can do nothing about it.
[HTC Rezound] AshtonTS:
In the contract It says they can cut your service for a device that has been
[HTC Rezound] nosympathy:
Yeah I don't care what Verizon says I am talking about the rules concerning c block.

Edit: they may be able to use that like if you were to force a sprint Prl etc and roam and such. Also if you are talking a 3G device and you mod it they can cancel your service. Or possibly if you have an LTE device but always use 3G they may be able to utilize it.

Honestly the way it all is written out is a gigantic mess.
[HTC Rezound] fjl307:
So let me get this straight. Verizon users can now tether "for free" (or the cost of a tethering app)? Does this apply to places without 4g service as well?
[HTC Rezound] nosympathy:
That is what is confusing. 3G doesn't fall under this so technically no. Also there really isn't a clear answer as to if unlimited users can tether or if it is just capped data plans.

Far as I have been able to tell it looks like just capped 4G plans. No 3G no unlimited.
[HTC Rezound] fjl307:
I guess next time I'm in a 4g area, I'll try a few tethering apps and see what happens.
[HTC Rezound] AshtonTS:
If you have a tethering app, you can use it for 3G, whether or not you're supposed to is Verizon's problem, but it is possible
[HTC Rezound] kzoodroid:
If you are on a share everything plan then tethering is already free, you just have to use Verizon's app but with this ruling you are supposed to be able too use any app available.

People with unlimited data plans its unclear what will happen as the ruling is very vague about this and Verizon will be able to use that vagueness to force unlimited data people to still pay for tethering. What some of the sites reporting on this are saying is that if Verizon catches you tethering on an unlimited data plan without paying for their tethering service then they will force you into a share everything plan. Which is supposedly what they are already doing anyways though I haven't heard of it happening, yet.
[HTC Rezound] zone23:
Capped 4G plans like family share plans already include Free tethering a.k.a. Hotspot. You get it on all your phones not just your rooted phone. So now the wife can use it on her Rhyme if she wants. Makes me wonder if Verizon new it was coming but just wanted the FCC to make it clear.

^this guy beat me to it - what he says...
[HTC Rezound] derek4484:
i think what verizon got in trouble for was for filtering out tethering apps from the marketplace. They will still charge for tethering, they just wont filter them from the marketplace any more. Also, they are trying to push everyone to the shared plans that have no tethering charges.
[HTC Rezound] brisdaddy1207:
I think we should protest outside of Verizon to get our unlimited data back. I still have mine but I'm for the screwed man.
[HTC Rezound] SynisterWolf:
Here is a good read on this topic.

http://rootzwiki.com/news/_/article...ty-by-the-fcc-in-ruling-against-verizon-r1012

Looks like any lte that uses C-block can not be charged for using a tethering app.

Sent from my iPhone...
[HTC Rezound] mike.s:
That's incorrect. VZW can't ask that tethering apps be blocked from markets, but for those on unlimited data plans, the tethering feature must still be paid for in order to legitimately use a tethering app. Direct from the consent decree:
[HTC Rezound] AshtonTS:
According the the rules it seems like synister is right. Regardless of of verizon abides by them
[HTC Rezound] c5satellite2:
It doesn't matter if it is tiered, or unlimited, if it is C block they cannot restrict or charge for tethering. The rules for C block have nothing to do with if you do or don't have unlimited data. Verizon knew this when they bid on it, and is exactly why they are trying to kill unlimited data!
[HTC Rezound] nrfitchett4:
which means verizon will use this as the reason they have to force us off of unlimited data. I would expect at some point (say 2 years from june 28) that they will announce that the old data plans will be phased out, even on month to month customers.
[HTC Rezound] mike.s:
Nope. You don't interpret the rules, and neither does synister. The FCC does. Read the consent decree, which I've already helpfully quoted. The FCC, whose opinion is the only one that matters, is fully aware that VZW charges extra for tethering for those with unlimited data, and are OK with it.
[HTC Rezound] SynisterWolf:
well as long as sprint is around and unlimited i know where im going once i loose mine. i use a ton of data with always running pandora on 4g
[HTC Rezound] mike.s:
Sure they can. They can deny you tethering if you don't pay for that feature, that's all the grounds they need. By your logic, anyone could cancel their whole phone contract, then demand that VZW still make the LTE network available to them. That's clearly not the case.
[HTC Rezound] derek4484:
That doesnt apply to current customers, only customers of their new share everything plans. I called verizon and told them I'm on a metered use plan. I have the 4GB data plan, which obviously is metered use and i told them I want my free mobile hotspot. They informed me "tough luck".
[HTC Rezound] c5satellite2:
Where in the c block agreement does it distinguish between unlimited vs tiered data? It doesn't!
[HTC Rezound] GrayBoltWolf:
Hehe. Burn.
[HTC Rezound] mike.s:
Where in your post is there a point? There isn't!
[HTC Rezound] AshtonTS:
I'm not sure you understand

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[HTC Rezound] mike.s:
I'm sure I understand the consent agreement, which was all about VZW restricting access to tethering apps, and had nothing whatsoever to do with "can't charge for tethering," like the title of this thread says. It seems, however, that there are a lot of wishful thinkers around here who haven't read, or don't understand, the agreement, and simply assume it says what they want it to mean.

Sure, you can use a tethering app without paying for the tethering feature, but the agreement recognizes that VZW still charges for tethering if you have an unlimited data plan, and "nothing herein prejudices Verizon Wireless’s right ... to take remedial actions, including termination of service, against customers who violate the terms and conditions of their service plans or Verizon Wireless’s policies applicable to the service provided to such customers."

If you're on a "share everything" plan, you can tether within the terms of your service plan, but you'll need to use a third party app. If you have unlimited data, you have to pay for the tethering feature, or you're in violation of the terms of the service plan. The FCC consent agreement doesn't change that at all, and in fact shows that the FCC recognizes and accepts the fact that VZW charges to add the tethering feature to an unlimited smartphone data plan. It also doesn't prevent them from charging for tethering on a tiered plan, it just recognizes that the new plans don't.

The GP's statement that the C-block rules don't distinguish between tiered and unlimited smartphone data is pointless. The C-block rules also don't prohibit VZW from charging to connect additional devices via tethering. They simply require that VZW be agnostic about which devices are allowed to connect to their network, which they are and have been. The rules say nothing about "free." You want to connect a PC? They'll sell you the tethering feature, or a USB modem, your choice.
[HTC Rezound] un1ocked:
ok, so that will be future OTA update that will patch the stock HOTSPOT APP

hurrah for guardia
[HTC Rezound] Serinety:
While this is interesting "forum lawyer" speak.. We seem to have a ton of threads about how much data people are using, and what apps work best for tethering. But we have no threads related to people being terminated for tethering, or charged after the fact for their tethering actions.

The evidence seems to suggest that, although what you say "might" be somewhat correct, vzw has no plans to charge or terminate anybody for tethering without a plan.
[HTC Rezound] Tornlogic:
That's because people are not getting charged or terminated. If that was the case, there would be dozens of threads of complainers saying they got charged or relieved of their contract
[HTC Rezound] mike.s:
Which only shows the number of reprobates who will openly break their word (contract), and steal services from a company. That VZW hasn't (AFAWK) kicked anyone off doesn't change the simple fact that tethering without paying for that feature isn't allowed, or the fact that the costs then get passed on to other users.

Your argument amounts to "If everyone else is looting that store, then it's OK if I do, too."
[HTC Rezound] *Madmoose*:
I can agree with you to a point here. I've always been a little surprised that people readily admit to using services or hacks for services that essentially allow free access to something that a company charges for. I appreciate and use the things that make my phone run smoother/longer, but when it comes to things that bypass something you are supposed to be paying for, I draw the line. (tethering and pandora come to mind atm).

I'm not saying this to bash anyone, it's just a personal choice I make. Everyone has a right to do what they want with their own devices. But somewhere down the line the lost revenue has to be made up somewhere.
[HTC Rezound] Serinety:
Using apps that are freely available, that require no altering of your device, that allow tethering, and are allowed to be installed by Verizon is different than hacking securities to bypass restrictions.

Verizon can allow or disallow any app on the app store from showing up when you search for it.

I have spoken directly to Verizon regarding this and was told, by them, that any app in the market is okay to use and install, even tethering.

So given that the tether apps are there to use (without rooting or hacking) and Verizon has said to me personally that I am allowed to use them. I fail to see your point regarding this break of contract.

Sure, by the letter of the contract, you can interpret it to match your definition. But if Verizon is not enforcing it, and is in fact not even trying to stop it, and also allowing their representatives say as much, why are you so insistent that those of us that tether are doing something wrong?

If it goes against some moral code you have, then don't do it. If vzw tells me to stop, I will not hack my phone to get around it. But while it is there to use, i will use it.

Edit.

Want to add that as of today, when I turn on the native mobile hotspot app, it activates without the subscription check.

Are you still going to tell me I can't / am not supposed to use it?
[HTC Rezound] mike.s:
Nope. Are you just making things up? VZW just got in trouble with the FCC for exactly that - getting Google to remove tethering apps from the Google store. The consent decree prohibits them from doing that any more. But, it also shows that the FCC recognizes that VZW does charge for tethering, for those with unlimited data plans.

Do you have unlimited data? If you're on a tiered plan, tethering is included. If you're on an unlimited plan, VZW has told you, in writing, that tethering without paying for the tethering feature is a violation of the plan terms (which you agreed to).

Reprobates rationalize all kinds of unethical behavior. It's expected of you.
[HTC Rezound] Serinety:
It is unethical to click the pre installed mobile hotspot app on my phone.. ? Is this the point you are trying to make? It is unethical to download apps from the market?

I might have agreed that it is unethical to bypass security by intentionally altering code to do so. But that is not what we are discussing.

You are trying to convince me that I am unethical because I use what Verizon has given me to use. Your rationale is questionable

I wanted to add this. I spoke to another rep , online this time, who confirmed what I am saying. She also recommended that I call Customer care. Here are both chats (I had to transcribe the phone call obviously)

and the phone call:

I was typing this as it was being said, excuse the typos.

Mike.S - I am really not sure why you are so adamant about calling people "reprobates" (which by the way is very offensive). Clearly tethering via 3rd party apps is okay by them. If it is STILL not okay by you, then perhaps you should choose a new hobby.

I see that you tend to go around all the different threads trying to point out how everyone is wrong in their thinking. But it seems like, at least in this case, you are the one who is wrong.
[HTC Rezound] mike.s:
Regardless of what some agent says, these are the legally binding terms:

- http://support.verizonwireless.com/terms/products/vz_email.html
[HTC Rezound] Serinety:
You keep going back to this. If you are arguing whether or not the contract says the words you are quoting, then you are right, it does say that. But clearly the company (at least as it lets on to its customers) is not enforcing this particular rule. We have evidence of that, we do not have evidence of anybody having their contract terminated for tethering a PC to their smartphone via 3rd part apps.

This "holier than thou" attitude you have is annoying. Congratulations you have succeeded in quoting a line from a contract, over and over. You are right that the contract says that. So I suppose this is a win for you...
[HTC Rezound] AshtonTS:
Dude just stop. You're trying to pick fights. Its stupid and annoying.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[HTC Rezound] platinumrims:
So it's not funny? :(
[HTC Rezound] blestsol:
Negative. :(
[HTC Rezound] platinumrims:
Awe I sowwy :(
[HTC Rezound] AshtonTS:
Now this is funny :p
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] t4d73:
Does anyone know how to get embedded flash videos to work properly? Seems mine is like slow motion and real choppy. I always thought it was cause flash didn't support android 4 but my 3d got the update ota today and flash is flawless on it so that can't be why. Any ideas?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] patrao_n:
A mention of what rom you are running kernel etc. Would be a very good place to start.

sent from my BAD A$$ Epic touch
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] t4d73:
Just stock rooted FF18. Sfhubb's one click. And agats 4.0 kernel but was having same problem before flashing kernel.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] swiftstrike763:
Hey guys sorry for the noob question but I'm pretty worried here cus last time this happened to me everything went straight to crap.

I plug my phone in to my laptop and turn on mass storage so I can copy files from my computer to my phone but it keeps saying that my phone malfunctioned and that windows does not recognize it.

Is there something I can do to solve this?

Thanks guys.

Edit: running cyanogen rc1.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] explosivequack:
Try different cords, a different usb port on your computer and make sure drivers are installed

Also wrong forum this should be in q&a
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] swiftstrike763:
Drivers are installed unless they were changed in the past few months. I only have the cable it came with and trying different ports gave me the same message.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] explosivequack:
Samsung cables usually aren't the best try buying an HTC or blackberry cable.