yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] atticusmas:
I was considering it but I am too scared...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] futuregerald:
This would be awesome. I have wallet on my nexus 7 but wish i had it on my HOX
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Loneeagle14:
Went ahead and flashed it for the fun of it. Constant fc's of nfc service upon reboot. Oh well.

I didn't expect it to work since it did say it required the touchwiz framework. :( nandroid ftw
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] gtkansan:
Yeag. We all wish. Ugh
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] XsMagical:
dont flash that guys, ive been playing with the google wallet for a while now with no luck, looks like we need 4.0.4 source before we can continue.

I/NfcExecutionEnvironmentManagerImpl( 4152): Wakelock released @ 1343759427602 ms.
I/NfcExecutionEnvironmentManagerImpl( 4152): Wakelock acquired @ 1343759427604 ms.
D/NFC-HCI ( 1613): HTC: phLibNfc_SE_GetSecureElementList
E/NFC JNI ( 1613): phLibNfc_SE_GetSecureElementList(): No SMX detected
E/ThermalDaemon( 231): ACTION: HOTPLUG critical failsafe cleared - Sensor 'tsens_tz_sensor2' - temperature 45, mpdecision_active
0
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Artood2s:
Anyone think the new Wallet update will.make it easier to get it working on the One X? Since the card info is now in the cloud, I don't see why phone/carrier should matter anymore.

XsMagical can you work some magic :D

Sent from my HTC One X
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] futuregerald:
Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe the new Google Wallet still uses the secure element portion of the NFC chip which we cannot use because we do not have the proper keys for this device. Without it we cannot write data to the secure element and thus can't process google wallet transactions.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] iElvis:
That's my understanding as well. It's not just the ROM; the NFC chip has to be able to set up a secure connection to the receiver.

But AT&T is allowing it on the GNex and the SGSIII, so who knows?

http://www.google.com/wallet/get.html
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] HTCFAN0923:
I soo want Google Wallet to work...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] KillerBeaver:
Got an Email from Google Wallet

Been messing around trying to get google wallet to work all day. I've been running into the same problems as everyone else. But, i just got an email from at noreply@wallet.google.com! Its stuck at Initializing your device then it fcs after a while. I'm going to keep trying to get it working.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] XsMagical:
We need source, if you read my changelog you would know why.

Sent from my Nocturnal'd ONE XL
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] KillerBeaver:
So, in order to fix the "No SMX Detected" error we need to get NFC libs that have SmartMX enabled and don't break NFC.

I know wallet was working on the international One X in the Modaco forums. Does the One XL share the same NFC hardware as the One X?

I know they have different processors; but, was unsure if the NFC hardware is different too.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] XsMagical:
Yes and no. I was testing the libs from that phone and the EVO LTE but no dice. Some would break NFC some would just fc.

Sent from my Nocturnal'd ONE XL
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] KillerBeaver:
Yeah, I tried the libs from the international OneX last night and found that out too.

Maybe we could ask HTC if they could recompile the libs with the header turned on.

I know when i was at the Aria forum we, and other people, petitioned Qualcomm to compile their user space library for ARMv6 after they only released them compiled for ARMv7, and they actually did it was awesome! Gave us the best hardware acceleration I'd seen on that little phone. :P Props to Qualcomm BTW. But maybe we could see if HTC could do something similar.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] KillerBeaver:
NFC Secure Element

Could these patches be applied to the OneXL kernel source to enable the Secure Element and enable card emulation so wallet could work?

http://nemik.net/code/android-nfc/Nfc-app.diff

http://nemik.net/code/android-nfc/libnfc-nxp.diff

It was written for the Nexus S which uses the same nfc chip that the One XL uses, the PN544.

At the very least, maybe it could be modified to work with the HOX.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] freshbakd:
If we should petition anyone it should be att? aren't they the ones who aren't allowing it to be used on the hox? Yeah it would be sweet if you guys could get it working though.... Wait someone should start a petition especially considering I'm sure it was a way to sell more s3s well now they wanna sell hox+ so maybe they would be willing to listen
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] nooomoto:
Att is moving forward with Isis instead of Google wallet. I predict you won't see Google wallet on any att devices, officially anyway.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] KillerBeaver:
Unfortunately I agree with you. I hate at&t.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] PUfelix85:
Any chance s-off could help with these issues?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] xybur:
Bumping this, I don't suppose anyone has made any progress on getting past the "secure element privileges" message.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] cbronson41:
Thats as far as I've been able to get too. I've also been searching on how to use isis while rooted to no avail. I'm not giving up though!!

I'd even consider paying a bounty if some intrepid developer could get one of these working! Anyone interested, either putting up some $$ or working on this?
[Microsoft Surface] The Janitor Mop:
http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/30/3201524/microsoft-surface-release-date-october-26th

Surface for RT is coming at the same time as general release of Windows 8. Surface Pro will be available 90 days after. Like I've been guessing, RT will be priced competitive with comparable ARM tablets, which should mean it will be around $499. Pro will be priced like an Ultrabook, which should mean $899 at least, and could go even higher. Anyone going to start saving up now that we have a release date?
[Microsoft Surface] ronaldheld:
Saving for the ~$1K expected price of the Pro.
[Microsoft Surface] warenbe:
can't wait

can't wait for the Pro version...

But i wonder: why 90 days after? i mean, it's the best way to loose market share. Or perhaps, microsoft want to give OEM some weeks to announce products?

btw, i wonder alswo why OEM are not communicating about products based on Windows 8 currently :(

I love the design, and i love the idea to be able to work on a tablet, but really work: i mean with real softwares (visual studio for exemple, or even office) and not "kiddies" software as we can find on Ipad and Android based tablets...

That's why i didn't bought any tablets, waiting for a real computer.

(sorry for my english, if there are mistakes, keep in mind i'm french, and french poeple don't speak well foreign languages :-p )
[Microsoft Surface] ronaldheld:
Maybe 90 days will see some Win 8 updates that could help the functionality?
[Microsoft Surface] ohgood:
what functionality is broken?
[Microsoft Surface] The Janitor Mop:
I have also been wondering why we haven't heard anything yet about Windows 8 products from the OEMs. I'm most interested in Windows 8 laptops, since I'm hoping Microsoft will push the OEMs to start delivering better hardware-no more 1366x768 displays, better trackpads, better keyboards, etc. Obviously October 26th is when new Windows 8 products begin rolling out, so we should have some announcements from the OEMs in September, maybe we'll hear rumors and specs of devices as early as late August.
[Microsoft Surface] ohgood:
they don't want to detract from current sales?

no need in shooting themselves in the foot!
[Microsoft Surface] The Janitor Mop:
Good point. Ultrabooks just haven't been as popular as the OEMs have hoped, and anyways a few new Windows 7 laptops are yet to come out (HP Envy Spectre XT). People will be buying 7 laptops less and less as Windows 8 draws near and it's in the press more, so they'll probably wait until they're satisfied Windows 7 laptop sales have bottomed out before introducing Windows 8 laptops.
[Microsoft Surface] warenbe:
nope, i dont agree: oem can announce products on Windows 7 and argues that these products will be compatible to W8, with a free upgrade.
[Microsoft Surface] The Janitor Mop:
I think my point still stands. Would you rather have a device that comes with Windows 8 or one that you can upgrade to Windows 8? I feel more confident in a device built for Windows 8, that it will run it better and just "fit" more properly with the OS. Whether or not that's the truth, it's how general consumers would think too. And I still believe that Windows 8 hardware will be more impressive than Windows 7 hardware. If a huge part of Windows 8 is trackpad improvements, I would think that the OEMs can build a better trackpad when they have Windows 8 to work with (rather than build a trackpad when they only have 7 to work with, and "hope" that the upgrade to Windows 8 will make the trackpad as impressive as a device that is built with Windows 8). Along with the fact that MS is obviously now telling the OEMs to get their crap together (Surface), I think we have solid reason to believe that hardware will be much improved with Windows 8-stock devices.

Think of an Android analogy: all specs aside, would you rather have a device that ships with Jelly Bean, or one that ships with ICS and can be upgraded later for sure? Yeah, with the ICS device, you know that you will be able to get JB, and you know that it will bring some considerable improvements, but isn't it just kind of an inherent thing to prefer the one that comes with JB in the first place?
[Microsoft Surface] ohgood:
this!

folks I know have been burned with " windows vista ultimate capable" and a few other kids, and remember it. unless its a sale person, on the road with a smashed laptop, I see people waiting..... just like when macbooks are due an upgrade.
[Microsoft Surface] warenbe:
yeah you're probably right, but i think average users and customers don't care about what is inside the computer. I mean, when someone of my family want to buy a computer, they always ask me "what should i take" and they show me some computers, usually they don't understand what "AMD" or "I5" mean.

so for exemple, if my parents or my sisters want to buy a computer today, they will take the "Windows 8 ready to upgrade" computer rather than "Windows 7" computer...
[Microsoft Surface] coolqf:
I'm gonna wait it out. My main use for my PC now a days it MS Office, and without Office 2013, the Surface Pro is just a fancy toy. There really aren't that many apps in the MS Store
[Microsoft Surface] Darknight247:
Yet ;)

There are more appearing every few days at the moment on Win8... more small devs but I see some bigger companies coming through.
[Microsoft Surface] nbates66:
Surface Pro is x86 and will run older versions of Office that ran on Vista and Windows 7 too, though Surface Pro isn't due out until probably next year, x86 tablets running Windows 8 will probably come from other OEMS first, such as Lenovo.
[Legend Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lolamarcel:
Hello,

I'm actually CM 7.20 and thus completely satisfied.

Only 2 things "trouble" me.

GPS does not work. I GPSFix and GPS status. I will see satellites, is also well fixed, but my Garmin says he has no signal.

What can that be?

The second thing that strikes me ... my Legend reacts after running extremely slow. I close out the lock and it takes quite a long time to see the widgets on the screen, if I want to have another desktop, it takes too long until you see it.

Does anyone have any idea what could that be?

I did not overlocked CPU, and it do not run too many apps especially.

Sorry for Englisch....its translate with Google :)
[Legend Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ranger4740:
Regarding GPS, have you looked at this link yet?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1793698

You might find it very usefull.
[Legend Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lolamarcel:
Hello,

thanks for the reply.

The thread does not help me really, the steps I've already been through.

Today I am with my Legend happening something. Since it is extremely slow over time I've asked the CPU to 768 (?) MHz and started the phone again.

Subsequently, all contacts were gone and I have the phone set up from scratch.

What have I done wrong?
[Xoom Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lucausee:
i tried to root my xoom 2 tim - mz616-32 but i made a ""little"" confusion! now the device don't boot and i see only:

ap fastboot flash mode (s) (flash failure)

0a.6c (sha-c79fifc, 2011-12-19 11:35:56)

eMMc Info Size 32g

Device is LOCKED, Status Code:0

Battery: ok

Ok to program

Connect USB

Data Cable

Can someone help me (step by step) how i can fix this and give a new life to my NEW Xoom 2?

i try with android-sdk but return the error > basttery LOW

Thank you sooooo much!!!:(
[Xoom Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Andrew_spiegel:
same

same problem... :/
[LG Nitro HD] aaki_rocker:
as the title states !

could anyone get dsp manager working on lg ics 4.0.4 !

i know it installs and everything but effects are nowhere near that on cm9/10 !

thanks .. :)
[LG Nitro HD] rani9990:
Try installing the Awesome Beats zip, I've used it on the leak without any problems so it should work on the official. I could be wrong though.
[LG Nitro HD] aaki_rocker:
i tried that !

sound is creaky and it distorts at high bass ! :(
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tobi-DS:
Hey guys, first i want to say i´m sorry for my bad english as its not my native language.

I think i´m ready to install my first Custom Rom, because i want to have ics after using gb such a long time. Also many games such as GTA 3 lag often.

I read that many ics roms have full touchpad support.

So I would like to ask you some questions, i would be very happy to get helpfull answers ;)

1. Is it true that i can play every game that works on gingerbread with that ics roms?

2. What about the gaming performance in comparison to stock gingerbread?

3. Are there any ics roms that runs smooth and with no major bugs?

Thank you very much! I hope that this kind of threads are allowed ;)
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jacklebott:
1. Some games don't work with the touch pads on ICS

2. Gaming performance sucks in ICS

3. Define smooth. As smooth as gingerbread, none.
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tobi-DS:
Okay, so i think i´ll better stay on gingerbread then, right?

What ist custom rom with the best performance? both, games and overall menu?
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] yukarundeng:
i think glazed ICS with lupus kernel is worth trying
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] baari21:
Well I'm using markphytonsics ROM and it's running just as smooth as gb for me. It also has the full touchpad fix. The only thing is a very few games don't work on it. You can try that one. Just make sure to do a nandroid incase you don't like the ics experience. Also be sure to titanium backup your apps if you don't want to lose them.
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tobi-DS:
to complete this thread, i´ve finally installed this and it runs really smooth!
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] swebosdev:
the stock debloated recovery zip on these forums is pretty good
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Diddy555:
Hi,

my father asked me, if it is possible with android to get a vibration/haptic feedback on EVERY touchscreen interaction. He was used to it with Windows mobile 6.5. Now he own a HTC Desire HD and i couldnt find an app that offers this feature. Is that impossible with android? Or does anyone know an app that can do this?

Thanks!
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Diddy555:
Push

push :good:
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DD-Ripper:
First of all Why would you want a Vibration on every touch screen interaction ?????The touch screen would become like a Drilling Machine. :p

You can, but only with soft keys and using keyboard.

♬★------ιƒ ι αgяєє∂ ωιтн уσυ; ωє'∂ вσтн вє ωяσηg シ------ ★♬
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Diddy555:
Personally i turn all vibrations off - i don't like them at all :p
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] orb_526:
I have a Play Store GSM Nexus running stock rooted Jellybean and this sounds crazy but it reboots when I go to a Stop and Shop grocery store (a grocery store chain in the Northeast US). When I go to this store, I usually wake my phone and use my Key Ring app to scan the barcode at the Scan It station (this is a handlheld wireless scanner that lets shoppers scan while they shop and just pay for the whole cart at checkout).

After the JB update, I was having reboot problems which I thought were related to the Key Ring app. I cleared data on that app and this went away. Since then, I have returned to the store and the rebooting still occurs after waking the phone not when trying to do something specific. While in the store the phone will boot up but remains very sensitive and reboots often. After leaving the store, everything runs fine. I was not until I went to the store again today that I finally made the coorelation.

Could something in that store really be causing my phone to reboot? They do have a Scan It Mobile app which allows the entire scanning function to work on the phone without using one of the store scanners but I have never installed it or tried it on any of my devices. So they have a system in the store that can communicate with phones unless the information is shared over 3G. The handheld scanner certainly are wireless but I am not sure which band. I checked the Scan It Mobile app reveiws on the Play Store and there are a couple bad reviews with notes "Don't install this on a Nexus running Jellybean or it will cause reboots". But again, I don't even have the app installed.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] adrynalyne:
Clearly your phone has gained awareness and is telling you to not shop there. I'd take heed.

On a serious note, the building is probably causing tower signal interference. If it severe enough, it will cause the device to reboot. JB has a weaker signal than ICS on some devices. Although some disagree with me.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] eqjunkie829:
I wonder if there could be a privacy issue also and jellybean isn't compatible with it so it just causes it to reboot.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] adrynalyne:
Privacy issue?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Bigsmooth843:
One word: Skynet. LOL.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ryanoc:
I'm having the same issue. I have a Verizon Samsung Galaxy Nexus running Bugless Beast Jelly Bean .

I was in a Giant Grocery Store that has the Scan-it program. I had poor 4G reception, so I tried to connect to the store's wifi. I didn't realize that he wifi that I was connecting to was for the Scan-it program. I phone continue to reboot until I left the store.

Yesterday, I went to a different Giant store and pulled my phone out of my pocket to check the time and noticed that it was rebooting. This time, I was able to turn wifi off which fixed the problem. I'm positive it's the SCAN-IT WiFI that's causing the endless-reboot issue.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] harveydent:
Odd, I have a GSM nexus and have no issues going to Giant. (I also thought their WiFi was for internet, not the scanners). My phone never rebooted even if I connected to the Scan-It network.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] orb_526:
So I went to a different Stop and Shop yesterday and confirmed the association with WiFi. I stood in front of the scanner stand and the phone was working fine. I than switched on the WiFi and the phone instantly rebooted.

Thinking about it later at home, I went into the WiFi settings and found a remembered network "scanit_mobile". I selected it and chose "forget". I must have tried to connect to it a long time ago on ICS thinking that it might give WiFi access in the stores which do typically have bad data service. Something that the network is doing does not play well with JB. That is my best theory anyway. I need to go back and test if this fixes the reboots. It still does not explain how it is happening though.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] shmuelp:
The wifi is the problem; affects Nexus S (with Jelly Bean) also

I can confirm that the wireless is the issue. Before the JB update, my Nexus S worked fine with the Scan-It program. Since that program requires you to associate with their internal wifi network (ScanIt_Mobile), it was one of the saved networks and my phone kept trying to associate with it. Each time it began to boot, it would almost immediately reboot until I jumped in and quickly forgot the network from the wifi settings. When I tried to reconnect, it restarted the boot loop.

Is there any way to capture log information to diagnose what the network is doing to reboot the phone?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Kyotohongaku:
Got the same issue on JB Gnex. In Russia, at about every SubWay restaurant. Something's weird with their wifi, I guess. Though my macbook finds their wifi, which got no internet connection.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] seanp:
Hi All,

Does the email app on the S3 do server side search, looking at getting the S3 but this feature is a must as I'll be using a work exchange account,

Thanks in advance.
[Off-topic] ChuckTesta:
Funny i'm asking this in XDA, but I had this argument with a couple of friends and well, they think that exploiting minor glitches in video games is wrong, though I think its nice to have a small boost sometimes!

What do you think\do?:rolleyes:
[Off-topic] Faiz Malkani:
I now pronounce you man and wife

:D
[Off-topic] Archer:
It depends. If you're using glitches to do stuff you can't normally do when offline then that's fun. If you're doing it online then you're a loser who needs a life. The only people who think it's okay to cheat online are other losers who also need to get a life.
[Off-topic] Roxy:
I don't.
[Off-topic] Archer:
Naughty boys aren't allowed online ;)

This is the main reason I get games for online play on the PS3 rather than the Xbox.
[Off-topic] iok1:
You live in the same world as me, i have a 2 ghz dual core and 2 gig of ram. Always have to pick lowest quality :( but windows 8 was a huge performance boost to it.

Sent from my Sensational phone
[Off-topic] 063_XOBX:
Not on my PS3 (not that I really play online often but I still feel like it cheapens the "achievements" ).

However I will on the emulators I play on my phone since the control scheme already puts me at a disadvantage and I'm not playing games on my phone for anything other a quick break from everything while I'm waiting on line or something like that.
[Off-topic] StormMcCloud:
You're missing out dude. The online community and servers are so much better on 360. I used to have both but I quickly grew tired of PS3's online community, so I sold mine.
[Off-topic] Quinny899:
Our shared desktop is 1gb of RAM and 1.8ghz dual core processor, with Windoze XP. It does however have a good graphics card and so plays Minecraft very well on far render distance
[Off-topic] Archer:
Nah, really I'm not missing out. I have played both platforms online and PS3 is my preferred choice. I'm the opposite of you - I've had a PS3 since release day, but am on my 3rd Xbox which I only got cos it was so cheap. I get them and then regret it and sell them normally. I'll keep it this time though, just for the exclusives.

Personally, I prefer an online experience where you don't have spoilt little brats calling you ever racist or homophobic slur they can think of. And I'd rather not listen to someone else's favourite dubstep track while trying to play a game. There's certainly a lot more Xbox users (kids always buy the cheaper console), but that's not really relevant when the first thing you do is mute every single one of them.
[Off-topic] Android_Monsters:
Depends on if I'm playing for money
[Off-topic] :
I have both systems too and I prefer the dual shock controller. I also like how Sony doesn't charge me every month, I have paid for XBL for months I didn't use it.
[Off-topic] Nutterpc:
I only exploit glitches in games once I finish them

Online gaming I don't, ever. Ruins the fun of online gaming when someone uses a cheat to gain an unfair advantage