yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] :
Will be impossible to fix camcorder? I searched for some time (to fix it on MMB AOSP) but the only thing that I found is that about all (or something like this) ARMv6 devices has this problem. I think except for it, CM9 only need some improvements to make it perfect as GB..!
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] ItachiSama:
I think that we can manage somehow to fix it... ;)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] jkshred:
thank you for this amazing ROM. haven't seen any better than it in a long time!! Jellybean on Gio.
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] RJA88:
Okay the search function is not working so I have to ask here, eventhough I suspect it might have been asked allready.

I flashed cm-9-20121120-UNOFFICIAL-gio, and everything worked fine. Except that I have no playstore anymore. I suppose I have to download an apk for this?
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] freedool:
yep, download google apps : http://goo.im/gapps/

;)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] :
Download and flash Gapps, mounting /system before.
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] freedool:
or on first page :

There is a link to tiny gapps for both JB as ICS on our links page
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] RJA88:
:o Yeah I didn't figure out what GAPPS stood for. Google Apps clearly. Thank you!
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] LPCA:
S2E

Got some new information regarding S2E.

in many searches i did, reportedly the fix is achieved by clearing dalvik caches, application cache, and also Google Play data.

however it does not fix the issue.

the error "can't install application - not enough storage available" can also be visible when installing locally apps with their .apk files.

(dropping them in /data/app also wont do any good, because of force closes - probably need chmod/chown fixing)

i found some other solutions by searching these threads:

http://madteam.co/forum/support-7/(...not-enough-free-space-to-perform-the-request/

http://android.stackexchange.com/qu...stall-from-market-applications-i-used-to-have

http://android.stackexchange.com/questions/25200/why-cant-i-install-apps-when-i-have-enough-storage

http://androidforums.com/optimus-v-...4-not-enough-storage-space-i-dont-habeeb.html

particularly by moving cache location to /sdcard (or /sdext, available in S2E for CM 7.2, but not in CM9)

# su
# cd /cache
# mv download download.old
# mkdir -p /sdcard/cache/download
# ln -s /sdcard/cache/download download

or by rebuilding it

# su
# mkdir /cache/download
# chown system:cache /cache/download
# chmod ug+rwx /cache/download
# chmod a+x /cache/download

# su
# mkdir /cache/download
# chown system /cache/download
# chgrp cache /cache/download
# chmod 0771 /cache/download

and app Cache Fixer

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=19698365

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=tk.rede.cacheFixer

and also app Lucky Patcher

http://appxg.com/apps/3207.html

http://lucky-patcher.netbew.com/

will try these later

NOTE:

S2E is not reporting errors:

FreeSpace neither...

all android maintenance apps i've used report the correct space for each partition/mount, and also a "df" in terminal returns correct values.

however, in System Settings -> Storage, the space is NOT reported correctly (right now, 178MB in internal data, 171MB available, but reads 699MB used, from /sdext).

however, in System Settings -> Apps, reports 7.7MB used, 171MB free... but some seconds after, reports 323MB free and an huge negative number in space used, on tab All.

so i guess Google Play and android internal apps are reading the values incorrectly, in spite the kernel reads them correctly.
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] ItachiSama:
Good. :) Had any lag?
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] LPCA:
i added this script, but it didn't helped :(

#!/system/bin/sh

# Fix cache
busybox mount -o remount,rw /cache
busybox chown system /cache
busybox chgrp cache /cache

# Fix download
busybox mount -o remount,rw /cache
busybox mkdir -p /cache/download
busybox chown system /cache/download
busybox chgrp cache /cache/download
busybox chmod 0771 /cache/download

play store just claims it doesn't have enough storage and period.

sometimes i'm able to update apps, some of them i wasn't able at all, and i can never install apps (without dropping them in /data/app and fixing permissions/user/group)

---------- Post added at 09:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:15 AM ----------

just the typical lag you expect on having everything in /sd-ext.

but the play store / installer problem persists.

another note: android insists on mounting /cache as read-only and on deleting /cache/download (maybe requested by play store)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] ItachiSama:
Mmmmh.

Tried installing other apps? (Maybe is an app installing related problem :D)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] LPCA:
update:

i found out why some apps can be updated/installed - the ones that can be stored/moved to sdcard (FAT/FAT32) don't trigger this issue.

i discovered this while moving apps to sdcard and then moving them back to sd-ext.

so basically android's installer refuses to install apps if the data is to be stored in /sd-ext/data.

is there a chance this can be fixed? i've searched a lot, but this does not seem to be a generic android 4.x issue, but most likely something broken in this "distro" for gio.

i've disabled again /data in S2E, and resorted to have less apps installed, block adds (less storage used) and clear caches often
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] erikcas:
Do you only habe s2e script installed or do you use more scripts, for example performance scripts?

I only use swap + s2e on CM9 and I don't experience any problems wirh intalling or updatibg from market

Verstuurd van mijn GT-N8010 met Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] vutaluk1995:
Hi, erikcas. Do you think update cm9?

PS Sorry for ETA
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] ironman38102:
I dont think it wont make any use cuz now OldDroid has made CM 10.1 so more people will flash that!
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] :
But I think that it would make too much use, 'cuz' lot of people are still using Android2.3 based Roms, also if we've Android4.0,4.1,4.2 based Roms.
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] saldymhmd:
Nope buddy, i think people will choose his desired custom rom. We've got cm10.1 fully stable now, so why not with cm9? That will make m and all the rest of Gio user proud with our Gio :p
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] erikcas:
who made it? :P

https://github.com/androidarmv6/android_device_samsung_gio/commits/cm-10.1

(WaylandAce did make it)

Since 10.1 is JellyBean, I think that as of today I will release 10.1 myself in this thread

For ICS: there is not much from CM side.
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] voetbalremco:
I dont see the need of you publishing 10.1.
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] warface123:
-1 :p
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] ironman38102:
+1
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] SkyrimBee:
+/- 0 cuz maybe erikcas' rom will be different from olddroid one's. This leads in more variety! :) But maybe it's unnecessary..
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] saldymhmd:
Why not if we have two versions of CM10.1 ? Is that wrong? People always have choice.
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] SkyrimBee:
Because maybe it is better if we have one AWESOME version and not two semi awesome versions :)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] Roman91:
what does it mean?

it's an open project and anybody can use it (so also edit/optimized it???)

so OldDroid only posted the rom (made by all the "team") in this forum?
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] erikcas:
To be hounest, I donot see the need of someone else publishing a version of CM-10.1 where efforts for Gio come from my hand

Is that reasonable? If you donot think that, I think further development for CM-10.1 for Gio device specific stops here.
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] voetbalremco:
you're right, the credits to who makes something something possible should be properly given, and someone shouldnt just others work and say it it theirs, wich happened in the past with cm9, we all know who it was. but that doesnt need to happen again.

in my opinion 2 threads with the same development is not the perfect waly of how it should be done, and not how XDA is created for. android is open source, and thus, on XDA we are a team. its not a competition in getting the best grades. maybe you should team up with the one using your work, instead of going on the rival side and make a new thread with the same thing.
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] droider007:
Most of the commits in gio configuration are due to wayland_ace and erikcas......but it still doesn't means that olddroid didn't do anything........but credits also goes to erikcas and wayland ace........!
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] erikcas:
Sure, there is no problem with that :)

:P also right.

But I have my reasons for this. It is not good to see someone claiming things fixed, when the effort is done by others.

And more specific, the fix is not fully tested yet.

Again, I also have my pride. I am not after thanks meters competitions (please get rid of the thing) but honour and respect for your work is food for motivation, I think that is going for every humang being. And that is what is fading away in the current situation.
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] ironman38102:
I think i should thank u for fixes i guess?
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] Roman91:
so in this case is better to add to any changlog also the author of the fix.

For exemple:

*Fixed camera (erikcas).

:D:D

give to caesar what is caesar's
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] voetbalremco:
contact oldroid about giving proper credits.

I dont think he agrees the idea to have 2 threads of the same rom neither.
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] erikcas:
Contact has been there. Maybe I don't agree on base of the work that has been done by me?

Na never mind. I think I am not the one that should be initiator here. So far for my motivation, it is gone.

I will request YZ to close this one and reconsider my contribitions.

Verstuurd van mijn GT-N8010 met Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] rohan007:
Erik has always been the man behind everything good that has happenend to our devices, he also does the same for mini/fit, I have been helping him fixing him a lot of bugs but overall its all his credits to have a successful jb on mini! I asked him to create a thread in mini dev section to release the Rom but he refused to do so , because he thought he would have a lot of threads to manage including the gio cm10.1 which he was about to release after fixing few more bugs before olddroid released it! So he has all rights in this world to release his bugs fixed, his jb ROM! :)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] erikcas:
Rohan, it is oké. I will spend all my time now on my yesterday born son and my daughter. Offcourse I will finish business for mini and fit for now :)

Verstuurd van mijn GT-N8010 met Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] :
Don't make as someone already did. Don't leave our forum, you're a great developer.

You're the first one who succeeded on doing an almost bugfree CM9 for GIO, and thanks to you, lot of ICS based rom were born on GIO forum, including my AOSP, based on your perfect sources! Also with JB, dude; lot of people are using your work as base. You made the progress here for our GIO.

You think you can do a better job than OldDroid? Do it! Also Marcin and Maclaw did it with AOSP. Someone is using our release (I think less), someone else their one. But that's not a problem. I did it because of my preferite hobby! Don't lose your main reason! :)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] rohan007:
Re: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

The thing was he never wanted any thanks or anything, the support of people always motivated him to work more and more, to get time from a very busy schedule of work, family and many more things! I know how hard he worked to achieve all this, and now when he was the real man fixing things, setting up online servers along with rashed( of lg thread) , he wanted to release the build which he along with wayland and other team members made bugfree, but u all refused it :/

:mad:
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] erikcas:
Re: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

Guys don't get mad. It is not the end of the world. I requested YZ to close this thread. So consider it closed, further discussion here is useless

Verstuurd van mijn GT-N8010 met Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] Roman91:
erikcas thank you for all your works for our Gio!! :D:D:D
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] gabrielking9:
Re: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

Please erik don't discontinue mini or fit work please
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] EvilKing009:
Good luck buddy,your'e an warrior of an CM9 smoothness making. :)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] OldDroid:
hi erikcas,

You are one of the best devs around here for gio :)

Now i succeed with AOSP 4.2.1 :fingers-crossed: so maybe we can all work still further like in a team :D

Anywhere im aviable here and wont stop my deving part, so i will continue your further work with Wayland_ACE, also some devs around here from lg (Bytecode ^^, he´s always helping me), you are my big idol and will be it also further, you brought me on the idea to make smth for gio what other users like, also u helped me almost every times i got an error, thats why i always will like you ^^

pls accept that erikcas will stop his deving part, i remember you told smth about your 2nd children has been born :D

I wish you luck on your further life-way, cheers bro
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] erikcas:
:silly: you don't get any of it. Someday you will grow up.

I moved somewhere else (Modaco) for Gio, it would be a pitty to stop this. For who wants, find androidarmv6 CM-10.1 roms there.

Had a great time here, will be back possibly later, but Gio forum in XDA does not inspire me anymore. It sucks energy instead of giving positive energy.

For Fit and Mini I will keep on contributing and participating on XDA. But I have had it here for now.

erikcas out
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] FlemishDroid:
Re: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

I know what you mean and your right. Publish your own rom is the best you can do! You (Erickas) gives always proper credits to your team so it must be hard when you do lots of work on a rom and the only thing you see is... I fixed this. I appreciate your hard work! I try all your roms so see you on modaco! ;)

Verstuurd van mijn GT-S5660
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] ironman38102:
Re: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

Well Good luck with ur life! and I would like to thank u for ur cm10. I guess another dev is retired!
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] AiphNday:
Re: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

See you in other world erik..

I know what you mean,so you'll know what i mean..

LOL

:D
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] Nytmarez:
Your CM9 is really good! It's pretty stable. Compared to the previous ROM I used - CM7.2, it is blazing fast! Keep up the good work! :cowboy:
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] r0bertt:
Thanks for all & good luck Sir!
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] dreuzel:
Re: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

I think handling an os and creating

a builing like 10.x and or 9.x is a xcoss effort where every one inspires every one.. An that is positive for all of you

Who did actualy what is somewhat less important and probably noone could have come this far without the other

Its a pity that testers and users can only show the problems, this is almost a fact of life

Achieving a real stable product is a painstaking group effort...

Some parts are boaring some tasks are highly visible. It is the reality in any project so certainly in a big one as this.

Real stability is normaly only optained much later then rc1

Maintaining multiple versions, allows for more people to be highly visual, and still inspire one another.

But managing ownership gets the difficult job then.....

In short you've all done a great job up to now...

Enthusiastic Gio User

Very glad with the work done

But sometimes a pusher for results( nothing bad intended)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] erikcas:
For you it might not matter who compiles or not. For some of you al that counts is releases being done as much as possible, without really get what is the bigger picture (someone in this section releases untested "fixes" and partly implemented enhanchements)

To me, it does matter in some cases.

If XDA policy is followed, a thread can be closed in this section here. Like it was in Fit section (http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=37583527&postcount=41)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] Roman91:
is not true,

all we know who is the best dev :D

and sincerely I'm sorry you do not devs for gio because of a "copycat" (cit):(
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] erikcas:
adjusted my text (...For some of you...) :)

Will be back soon :)

Since CM-10.1 still is JB, there is no reason not to release hounest things
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] :
Glad to hear that! We were missing you! :)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] Roman91:
the best news of the month :victory:
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] ItachiSama:
R: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

God I'm crying. :crying:

Simply epicness. Would not believe to this.

Anyway, waiting for you erik, still have lots of question (yep I'll bore you xD) and lots of stuff I can learn from you ;)

See you soon, mate ;)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] pepe.tan:
hope to see the fully update with kernel 3 soon.. thx anyway erikxas.. :)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] ironman38102:
Re: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

Glad ull be back soon!
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] Dark Passenger:
A sad mans rant...

If I am allowed to say a few things :

I supported the fact the OldDroid release a ROM for galaxy fit forum even though erikcas already had an edition released.That was mainly from the fact that i wanted the latest release(Am a rom junkie...) and didn't really think about what the developers felt or what was right or wrong those were my mistake and am currently apologizing to erikcas for my wavering loyalty(this is for my sake).

Currently if you observe the pioneering work on android is being done by AndroidArmv6 organization with the main contributors(for Samsung devices) being Wayland_Ace, Erikcas and Psyke83 I think the most common mistake really took place here and we all forgot who really was working(how ever much you say hobby they do spend the hours) we used the fruit of their labors shamelessly and never bothered to really show our appreciation for the efforts that they put into it.Also since they don't ask for money for their work(no donations didn't you notice) and leave it for all the world to use.Think the least thing that all of us can do is give credit.

I write here to display my complete and overwhelming respect for the work that not just erikcas but even WaylandAce and Psyke83 have and are putting in for our orphan devices that were dumped by their creators.

Thank you for your time ...
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] gabrielking9:
Re: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

Just a example: rashed on cm10 (optimus one) took 2 or 3 months to release the build 7 but people waited people wasn't requesting to other dev compile a new cm10 just because it took some months to release because rashed was fixing a lot of things and on galaxy fit it just passed some days and when erikcas release it it will be with good changelogs.

And as you can olddroid don't have commits on galaxy fit device config or on kernel config for the devices and he don't even know that kernel board was messed up and he just downloaded and compiled it (Everyone can do it).

P.s. My intention is not discussing with you or anyone i'm just giving the truth.
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] FlemishDroid:
Re: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

Glad your back cause on modaco it wasn't the same... :)

Verstuurd van mijn GT-S5660
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] Dark Passenger:
True and I acknowledge my mistake also i never requested him to build it for fit he chose to do so on his own terms(at least according to me)later i requested an update because of the fact that i didn't want to disturb erikcas as her was/is doing extremely important work that will affect min,fit,gio & ace(3.0 kernel...).

PS just clarifying my position here also any further discussion on this topic please continue via private messages only lets not spam this thread any more.

Thanks,

Dark Passenger
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] dreuzel:
Re: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

Thank you! It certainly matters

Enthusiastic Gio User

Very glad with the work done

But sometimes a pusher for results( nothing bad intended)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] FlemishDroid:
Re: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

New update cm10.1 from erickas on modaco. ;)

http://www.modaco.com/topic/360352-androidarmv6-for-samsung-gio-gt-5660-update-12022013/
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] bogdanwp:
About that , is this the same thing ? i found it earlier today i was not sure :D

http://jenkins.androidarmv6.org/job/androidarmv6/106/

Anyway cheers to erickas for the hard work

---- L.E. : using it right now , it`s just brilliant , highly recommend it :D
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] gabrielking9:
Re: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

Yep he build on jenkins :)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] tcris45:
Thank you erikas for all your hard work for our and other devices you are awesome :)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] Roman91:
Fantastic!!

known bugs or issues??

not working?

Also gapps are included?

Thank you erikcas
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] lukas12153:
i just installed it 2 hours ago. it works smooth.

yes, gapps are included.

i didnt notice any bugs until now,

for me it works better than the older releases, i had big problems with them.
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] MH-Droid:
Re: [DEV][JB][ICS]Unofficial CM10 / CM9 [04.12.2012 - JB & 20.11.2012 ICS]

Is it better than olddroid release?
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] lukas12153:
For me it is smoother than olddroids cm 10.1 and the battery life is better as far as i tested it now.
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] SkyrimBee:
How many hours did you get, sir? :)
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] erikcas:
over 13 hrs. Moderate use.

Nice to see activity in another thread (another world) then where I posted the rom :P
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] SkyrimBee:
Thanks! :) What means moderate use for you? :D

Sorry: What does moderate use mean for you? XD
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] erikcas:
That I have been too busy @ work to notice my use.

:silly:

Edit: it was mainly standby, testig FB forceclose and some other heavy app emulating to be sure the spontanious reboot is gone. Some whatsapping (picz of my 4 weeks old son :P) and 4 or 5 phonecalls. Some mailreading and tapatalking
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] SkyrimBee:
Ooooh okay.

- Some mobile data/Wifi

- Many SMS

- Whatsapp

- Many Music

- Dimmed Screen

What do ya think? How many hours will the battery last?
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] skayer:
Is there working BLN and headphones button on this rom? If no, can i flash kernel from 19.01.13 OldDroid version, where they are working?
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] Roman91:
eric what about battery stats and the issue of audio routing ???(i think the last 2 things to fix in CM10.1)

---------- Post added at 10:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:11 PM ----------

i think all day, but you must try and see yourself
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] erikcas:
Batterystats is still a non-critical issue. Audiorouting should be fixed but did not test actively myself. I hope to hear from you guys as my focus is on kernel 3 atm.

BTW anyone has access to jtag hardware here?
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] warface123:
Do you need a jtag or how do you mean ?
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] Roman91:
good,

one litt request :D

in order to improve the final experience can you see if there's the possibility to add the haptic feedback (like in GS3, when you press the menu or back button the phone vibrate) :D:D