[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
You continually insist that you are in the right, and that you have done your due diligence in searching. You have even gone so far as to start bothering me with PMs over this issue. However, you're not right, and I am going to dismantle your arguments piece by piece. Baseless flames are one thing, but when someone is clearly wrong and continually posts misinformation, it's time to dismantle them.

Now, do you see me, in any way, taking issue with the question posed at http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=32009695&postcount=1571 - No? Did I answer it? No. Three users below you did an excellent job answering it. I even provided more information at http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=32044337&postcount=1581

The post I had issue with was this: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=32009695&postcount=1571 - where you wasted time and bandwidth posting as screenshot that was clearly taken with an outdated build.

My response to the question above was not to post questions related to outdated builds. It was obvious that you were on one, as any build made on or before the post you linked below already had it. So your post was clearly made using a build from BEFORE my post indicating that it was a recent addition.

Did you use common sense? No. If you had used common sense, you would have taken the two things:

1) I indicated that a particular feature had recently been added (see post of mine you linked below, dated September 24)

2) You did not see that particular feature

Obvious conclusion: Your build is out of date, time to update.

Did you come to that obvious conclusion? No. Instead, on September 26, where AT LEAST two nightlies had been released since my indication that the feature had been added, you complained about the feature not being present.

Now, I could have responded with a flame there, but I simply responded with a polite request: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=32052373&postcount=1584 - A simple "Please don't post problems with outdated builds."

Rather than comply with this request and update, you flew off the hook and claimed that you were on an up-to-date build, when it was clear that you were not, and were at least five days out of date, and that I was an evil horrible asshole for daring to point out that you were on an outdated build.

Others explained what it was. I did not need to.

It was obvious, from the post above you linked, that it was a build previous to 9/24. Thus, the obvious solution would have been to update to the 9/25 or 9/26 nightly, instead of posting a screenshot that you don't have a feature.

FYI, the specific merge date of the feature was on or before September 21. So when I made the post you had linked above, there had been AT LEAST three nightly builds since the feature was merged. When you posted your complaint that the feature was not present, there had been AT LEAST FIVE builds.

But when I simply stated "Please don't report issues with outdated builds", instead of going and updating (the conclusion you should have reached before you even posted that screenshot), you flew off the lid and responded with a rant indicating that you were running a nightly that was, at most, 1-2 days old. Obviously, this is a lie, since the feature in question had been present for at least five days when you first posted your screenshot.

What false accusations? You claimed to be running an up-to-date build when you were CLEARLY running one that was at least five days out of date. That, to put it simply, is lying.

I am not rude to everyone around me - I have posted detailed technical explanations of numerous things to many people, in order to help those who have a willingness to learn. However, I have zero tolerance for those who refused to apply common sense (such as "a developer claims a feature is new and I don't have it, maybe I should update? Nah, I'll just post to XDA instead without reading the thread I'm posting to!") or who insist on being spoonfed (See I9100 thread with posts regarding yesterday's nightly - "I have a problem with the nightly. I am going to go and immediately post to the I9100 thread without performing simple basic tasks such as reading the previous two pages, or hell, even reading the last five posts on the thread.")