yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stevenege:
So for the past few days my screen on the Nexus 7 has just been effed up. With the lift, burn in issue (well not bur in, but what I am assuming is a bad digitizer and screen), super bright screen for about 2 minutes and then it goes normal until you turn it off... then it is back to the waiting game. You can see the "burn in" under the pattern unlock.... so you tell me what you think.

This tablet has been babied beyond belief, if it is not in my hand it is in it OEM case being carried in my backpack.... so this is an issue with the actual tablet. Has anyone else had this issue yet?

Also, I started the exchange process before everyone was informed they would need to pay $280 again and wait for a new device. I will not give them more money, as I do not even do that with computer companies like Dell or HP. I would much rather just send it in and wait.... because if I get another one that is messed up it would be a nightmare of $300 staying out of my hands at all times.

Money is not the issue really here, it is the fact that there is a noticeable amount of "bad" devices out there in the first batch that should be recalled.... I suppose we shall see.
[Atrix 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lonepal:
I cannot download latest versiyon on neutrino 2.8.But with joker ics everything is normal.Is the latest version only for ics?

MB860 cihazımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] treIII:
i would post in meanrom but im not permitted yet. i want to b able to overclock on meanrom. ive tried every method possible as mikey describes such as the zip file and using root explorer and saying yes at the prompt when backing out. the overclock has worked before on my evo but now its not. all the zip files in the meanrom ics folder work fine for rosie button remapping so forth. all but overclocking. i know quadrant is not the best but when the overclock works my score is always 5800 to 6300 at 1.782.also my current frequency and max frequency are 1.782. also cf bench and antutu are also much higher. if someone knows anything to help pleasa respond. thanks
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] michael.stollaire:
SetCPU for Root Users

I would take a serious look at this application, which I have used successfully on the Evo 4G and my current LTE:

SetCPU for Root Users

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mhuang.overclocking&hl=en
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] COCODRILO45:
how come you just dont use cleanrom you could overclock your evo to 2 mhz its a nice i was on mearom for while but cleanrom just a bit better give it a shot
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] treIII:
i tried set cpu and no frills cpu. they both cause my evo to operate terribly while on meanrom ics. thanx tho
[Milestone 2 General] Dener_Silva:
Hello, sorry my english ...

Is there any way back to the factory rom (Froyo 2.2)?

I am using the official 2.3.6 rom vivo brazil...

I would go back to the original rom, because I'm having problems with this rom...

Its possible ?

Please help-me

even more y.y
[Milestone 2 General] Caesarivs:
You can't downgrade from that firmware
[Milestone 2 General] Dener_Silva:
friend did not understand...
[Milestone 2 General] allbass:
You can try this:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1497263

It Works for me!
[Milestone 2 General] Caesarivs:
If you flashed 2.3.6 Vivo Brazil, you can't go back to froyo...

2.3.6 from vivo brazil has BL=4 so this method doesn't work... it's not possible, period

From http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1465476
[Milestone 2 General] yuriebc:
and what if they install tim or motorola retail rom?
[Milestone 2 General] Caesarivs:
He said in the first post he's using 2.3.6 vivo...
[Milestone 2 General] yuriebc:
yes. he install tim ou motorola retail over vivo. then he downgrade. its not possible?
[Milestone 2 General] Caesarivs:
No, that's what I'm saying, he flashed Vivo, he can only flash R01 or R02 firmwares which aren't downgradeable...
[Milestone 2 General] giovanni.rimoli:
and if I had retail version of 2.3.6?? I can downgrade to stock 2.2?
[Milestone 2 General] Engle_Mars:
try to flash it with the SBF, please ensure u use same leleve BL SBF. Otherwise it will brick your device
[Milestone 2 General] Lean946:
There are no froyo SBFs with the same BL version as 2.3.6 vivo...

2.3.6 Vivo Brazil is CG31 version 4, all froyo SBFs are version 2.

Also, this won't work. Don't even try it, or you'll brick.
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] setspeed:
I'm trying to flash LT15i_4.0.2.A.0.42_Generic Global.ftf onto an Arc that has 0.62 installed.

Using Flashtool 0.8.0.0 but it keeps telling "flash cancelled" before I've even plugged the phone in.

Drivers have been correctly installed, and I'm dragging/dropping the .ftf file into the Flashtool window, then selecting that file from the next window that pops up. But it then gives me the following:

24/033/2012 22:33:05 - INFO - Selected LT15i_4.0.2.A.0.42_Generic Global.ftf

24/033/2012 22:33:05 - INFO - Flash canceled

This is before I've even connected the phone.

Any ideas what's wrong? I'm new to Sonys.
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] setspeed:
I've read somewhere that only Flashtool v5.x.x.x or v6.x.x.x can flash 2.3 ROMs onto an Arc - is this correct?

Where can I get it if that's the case?

I'm currently downloading the latest Flashtool I can find v.9.0.0.0
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SXUsr:
http://androxyde.github.com/
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] setspeed:
Thanks, so I can get v6 from there - is this my problem though? Surely any later/subsequent versions of Flashtool should incorporate compatibility with every phone/ftf that went before it?

I am slightly frustrated, this reminds me of my days of jumping through hoops when I had an HTC...

Any pointers on what the problem might be will be gratefully received!
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] setspeed:
After trying Flashtool v8 and v9 I finally managed to obtain v 0.6.7.0 which worked.
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MrModMan:
I use Flashtool 0.7.1.0 works perfectly
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 4b3l4rd0:
Not working for me

I know it's has been a year o so since last reply to this thread :laugh:. I'm trying to do exactly what you claim that was accomplished. :cool:

I'm asking you to share me the exact flashtool version that worked for you :good:. Nowadays it's been difficult to download a previous reliable version of flastool exe like those installers that you claim.

The latest

flashtool version (currently v0.9.11)

recognizes my LT15a device, but when I try to flash the device,

the ROM I intend to flash (LT15i_4.0.2.A.0.42_Generic Global.ftf) doesn't appear in the list

, and I'm sure that the ROM is located in the firmware folder. :crying:

Androxyde encourages to use latest version but it's not working for me. I'm using 64 bit Win8. Drivers are working just fine. I appreciate any help here.
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Someguyfromhell:
Works fine on me, are you sure you are in the very correct folder? Is it the FTF file there?
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] setspeed:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/13612505/flashtool-0.6.7.0-windows.exe

Good luck! (:
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 4b3l4rd0:
Big step today. Thanks.

Yeah, pretty sure. I confirm newer versions of flashtool (0.9 and 0.8) don't work for this particular purpose at the time. Some other ftf files do appear in the list except for the one I intended to flash LT15i_4.0.2.A.0.42_Generic Global.ftf. But I was able to get over this with your help, all of you.

[QUOTE

Good luck! (:[/QUOTE]

:good: Setspeed, I would like to thank your effort in this particular request in such short notice. Finally I managed to flash de ftf with your FT v0.6.7.0 installer link. At the last minute, I decided to flash a slighty similar ftf file: LT15a arc_v2.3.4, 4.0.2.A.0.42_Generic America (thanks to BluechipJ), since the stock model of my device was LT15a. I worked out like expected and finally I applied the root with the same FT version, successfully. Again, thanks. :good:

Finally, just for the record, not related to the thread, :cyclops: I'm trying to upgrade to 4.0.2.A.0.62 via the update center app in order to get a rooted 0.62 android, but the device is refusing the upgrade when connected with Wi-Fi. Information regarding this in other threads/forums suggests that is more likely to obtain the upgrade via 3G rather than via Wi-Fi, and some people claim being successful in the matter. I'll try that in a few days :cowboy: , if successful I will clean up bloat-ware in 0.62. If not successful, then I will clean up backup apps and clean bloat-ware in 0.42. I'm living in Colombia, I don't know if that has something to be related with OTA upgrade (3G or Wi-Fi) or anything else :confused: .

However, I like what I got by the moment, 'cause is a rooted firmware. I will thank again and consider done this issue in my case. :p
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Someguyfromhell:
Just asking...did you run Flashtool as administrator?
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] setspeed:
Glad you (mostly) sorted your problem. I can't help with the rest I'm afraid, I barely had this phone for a week, it belonged to a friend and she hasn't had any issues since (:
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 4b3l4rd0:
No title

Always, the 64 bit exe.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] trea916:
hey just wondering if anybody would had the best thread to follow for cm 10 on the galaxy note
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] msedek:
Yeah seriously I don't know what's the mystery about it.. Already running cm10 on my gtab and gnexus I know they don't like people ask when their phone will get CMXX. but CM developers should try to communicate better with users... Open source, free work in this scale is not excuse for blindness

Enviado desde mi GT-N7000 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] SpyderTracks:
Maybe it's worth posting a note on the cm forum and getting as many of us to sign it, that's how we got cm9 in the first place. I'm pretty sure they're already working on it.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] jaiiscool:
Track xplodwild's twitter account. Thats ur best bet.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] mb0108:
Xplodwild does a great job on implementing the s3 cm10 previews. I tested the previews from the beginning. I have now migrated to N7000 and cannot wait for the First previews there.

Gesendet von meinem GT-N7000 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Phenryth:
There will be long wait to have a fully working jellybean on the Note.

Mostly due to Samsung who delays Note updates for newbies critical bugs (ie brick bug) and also to sell the Note 2. Why users will buy Note 2 if they have a fully working ICS/Jellybean on the first one ?

Kernel/FW sources will be released in a long time.

Concerning CM10, hope they will not face issues like working camera etc.

As an example, CM9 & Aokp/Aosp are ready for months on galaxy tab but still missing functionnalities & working camera which make them useless. Cause of no sources available for devs.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] msedek:
Cm9 works with 4.0.4 way before samsung releases 4.0.4.. Drivers compatibility its for 4.X.X that's well known.. And cm team several weeks ago (since jb source droped into aosp) started the merge with ics and they said it was a piece of cake since the drivers from ics are the same... We don't need samsung sources to get JB.. Cm can deliver a jb rom with what they already have..

And in the case of gtab 10.1 we don't have working camera because our kernel developer Wich also is the cm9/10 maintainer for tab ported all the drivers from honey comb Wich were a slightly improvement over ginger bread drivers.. That's why we don't have a working camera yet.. But hey everything else works. Hwa/gps/sound/wifi/3G and cm10 its running on the tablet buttery smooth with the lack of camera.. And those are drivers from honey comb..

So tell me what's wrong with cm10 for note when they have every single driver for ics available... Makes no sense to me... Most of the popular phones/tabs cm supports in cm9 already have a cm10 preview

Difference here its that our cm developer I'm gtab is an angel.. What a nice guy he baby every single person that uses cm9 and or his kernels... He takes care of every single case one by one and he didn't move to merging jb until the last of us solved his personal issue...

Pershoot (our cm developer for tab) is not thinking he's a all mighty god untouchable its what he says and everyone else is bull$hit its an attitude problem here

Enviado desde mi GT-N7000 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] @denny:
the cm9 thread for now ....a new thread will be started when the cm crew are happy they can release it and not have a bunch of people going arhh why this dont work why that not work...as umbelievable as it might seem there is a lot of time consuming work and fixes that go into making your new rom..PATIENCE is a vertue ,,whinging is just plain annoying
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Phenryth:
You just did not understand what i've written.

I am hoping that CM teams won't face these issues like camera even if they should not be concerned.

I am certainly not speaking about their awesome work but about the fact that if issues raise with CM10...it can be hard to fix since Samsung are not going to release the eventual sources needed before months.

Nevertheless, i am running CM9 and I love it. But there are still missing stock functionnalities. It is for users to know if they can live without them or not. Some absolutely need S-suite...other the Mhl...and for me, working camera especially for skype is a must have. That is why I have to run that **** of samsung stock over my gtab 8.9.

I am angry towards Samsung...not towards the different developers teams who litterally save us.

As an example, they fix the emmc brick while Samsung did not do it yet and force most of Note users to remain at Gingerbread..which just innacceptable for the ones who's getting the most money between manufacturers.

I also have the Xperia S...comparing Gb/ICS to samsung stock is just day and night. At the end...comparing to any devices I had/have..Samsung provides the best innovations and hardware but the worst system.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] msedek:
I have cm10 in all my devices but gnote and I completely love it.. What I don't get its the cm developers attitude here.. Handling people like they are gods and not giving a small preview or a single word about the jb rom

Enviado desde mi GT-N7000 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] eddiekrueger:
Originally Posted by msedek View Post

Cm9 works with 4.0.4 way before samsung releases 4.0.4.. Drivers compatibility its for 4.X.X that's well known.. And cm team several weeks ago (since jb source droped into aosp) started the merge with ics and they said it was a piece of cake since the drivers from ics are the same... We don't need samsung sources to get JB.. Cm can deliver a jb rom with what they already have..

:good: totally agreed with that.

it's depending to Samsung. their to busy making big money instead of customers who facing problem with their own product. working too slow to solve their own problem and not appreciates value customers.

and yes ! i'm totally agreed with you, here Devs making a lots of improvement and modifications just to ensure satisfaction to enjoyed what we all paid of.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] androidindian:
lets be patient. Xplodwild will start a new discussion thread once he releases it :) in the general section here
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] XpLoDWilD:
Like a few hours? :)

(if you don't mind project butter not fully working)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] msedek:
Nuff said

Enviado desde mi GT-N7000 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] SpyderTracks:
Love you, man!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] iyousif:
Here's come the legend! RESPECT!

Seriously, we can't wait to test JB in Galaxy Note!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] gedster314:
I'll wait for the Butter.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Entropy512:
Yeah, we got lucky. Unlike GB audio blobs in ICS, ICS audio blobs worked with a backwards-compatibility wrapper in JB.

I don't think anyone was expecting it to work but it did. I would've started working on the Note tree last night, but I got home late and am away from home almost all day today. xplod will probably have a tree up before I get home, he cheats by being 6 hours ahead of me in timezones!

Due to certain limitations of our graphics blobs, the majority of "butter" will not be present.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] PoisonWolf:
Out of curiosity, would the limitations be fixable, given time? Or is it just not-fixable and our Notes would forever be dry and crusty, without any butter?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] newuser134:
I read in a thread that someone lost their imei and it was suggested for them to use *2767*3855# to restore everything back to factory and reactivate the sim. I know this won't update oyur baseband to the newer editions, but it made me think about if someone bought a new phone that has the updated firmware, or somehow got their baseband/radios/kernel updated to the new version (whether through OTA or through getting a new phone), would it be possible to downgrade baseband/radio/firmware back to the previous edition since the VRLF2 version is also signed and authentic?

If it is possible to downgrade, does anyone have the dump files needed from an "older" version to do this? How would it be done, through odin or recovery, or terminal/adb (like backing up and restoring /efs partition)?

Thanks
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] fluxvalve:
Yep, see http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1788313 for details.

The forum post has links to both the old and new modem, and full flashing instructions.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] droidstyle:
yes and I would only use the VLRF2 since it does not have the dumbed down search...the update is a downgrade!! If you like you can upgrade to the VRLG1 radio/modem and stay on the VRLF2 software.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] pjamv5:
True, although you can just get the full featured googlequicksearchbox APK and replace the new one with it.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] droidstyle:
indeed...more than one way to skin a cat.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Desterly:
Is there a general concensus yet on the newer modem? seems the posts go both ways... a lot of people saying it's better, others saying it's not.

I guess the only way to be sure is to try it out
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] fluxvalve:
I used the Phone Info app to shut off 4g, and made a number of before/after test of the 3g signal.

It seems to be consistantly 2 or 3 db better with the new modem.

For example, sitting at my desk, I would show -82 dBm with the old modem, and -79 dBm with the new modem.

Can't say if there is any difference in 4g performance, it's nice and fast both before and after.

One change that I noticed, with the new modem, when switching from 3g to 4g, it changes over almost instantly. Before the modem upgrade, it would take maybe 30 seconds or so to pick up the 4g signal.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] excelsisba:
I535VRLG1 update

I also wondered this. Is there a reason except for the search function to go back to the first radio?

Also on a side note, I never accepted an OTA update! Was this pushed without the user's consent?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] fluxvalve:
Updating the radio has nothing to do with the search function. If you currently have the VRLF2 build, you can update the radio (also the kernel) to the newer version without changing the build version.

If you purchased an updated phone, or take an OTA update, then you will have the downgraded google search. As pointed out by pjamv5, that's easy enough to fix if you want the old google search.

I've updated the kernel and radio, here's the end result:
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] mjb32803:
I first flashed the G1 radio firmware and kept the F2 ROM. I didn't notice much of a difference. Went ahead and flashed BeanTown R2 ROM which is based on the G1 rom but customized. It all works well for me.
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] fobeeguy:
I installed a couple of Office Suite from Amazon Free App of the Day on my phone. I am wondering which one is the best for the Nexus 7. I can download other free alternative if it is even better. Thanks!

List of Office Suite that I have from Amazon:

OfficeSuite Professional 6

Quickoffice Pro

Documents to Go 3.0

Or should I go to a free one?
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] CharliesTheMan:
I like quick office pro, and I think I remember them being bought up by Google docs or something like that not too long ago. I can't remember I'll have to do some searching.
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] lostwhat83:
Kingsoft office... And it is free
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] player911:
I have Office Suite Pro that I got for free.... so that's my only choice.

I used Polaris on my old transformer and I liked it. There is a really good comparison between the various office apps some where online. I think someone from the Asus transformer forums did it.

Some allow you to only read and not edit. I can't see really having to edit or create documents on the go, but I guess some people do. As long as I can open them, I'm good. Since you have access to them all, won't you simply try each one and tell us what you like better?
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] bwassef:
I have always used quickoffice pro on my 10" tablet, and I installed it on my nexus 7 and it works great. I also got those three office apps from amazon, and quickoffice pro seems to be the least buggy
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] Malikai_:
CloudOn is one of the best office apps I've seen, although you need to be on wifi and have a box, dropbox or Google drive account (or all 3) as it only reads from cloud storage. They match the office ui almost exactly and have support for Excel, Word, and Power Point docs. Also it only works on tablets.

Sent from my Nexus 7
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] bpye:
QuickOffice Pro HD is great, though you'll need to pull the APK off another device, it doesn't think it works on the N7.
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] ram130:
Which office suite would be best for a student? I'm looking at Smart Office 2. Anyone tried it? I believe its on sale now for $1.98
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] LanceSandino:
How did you get cloud on? When I go to it it says its not compatible...
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] moryoav:
Here is the link to the comparison:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1085173
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] :
Quick office HD.

Think it shows not compatible in the play store, but it works fine.

You can link it to all your cloud storage accounts.

It has really advanced features that mean you can create documents as if they have been made on the PC.

I think quick office were acquired by Google not so long ago but I might be wrong on that.
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] iElvis:
+1

I have no idea how this is free. It's as full featured as the $15 apps. There are no ads or other bloatware.
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] Jutt69:
Another vote for KingSoft, It's brilliant. I paid for it when they used to charge.
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] SPreston2001:
+1 for Kingsoft it really is great. Like iElvis said, I have no idea how its free but its fully featured works great!
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] k8sh:
Thanks for the king soft suggestion. It is much better than quick office pro I got for free on Amazon.
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] bwassef:
I have no issues installing it from the amazon app store, i guess its a play store thing?

I recently tried this app as well, I love it. I don't think anyone should spend money on an office suite app since this one is available
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] arcisbre:
+1 Kingsoft
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] ram130:
I like king soft but its very laggy. Anyone else ?
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] ExploreMN:
I posted a thread exactly like this and the general consensus was Quick Office Pro HD. I got off Amazon since it doesn't show up in the Play store. It works awesome, integrates with Dropbox too.
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] nuhsenutten:
I have king soft installed and it works perfectly, haven't experienced any issues.