[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] electech13:
Well tecnically stock doesnt actually let us change volts and likely not even view the numbers but battery was decent so figured lower BUT like i said i was running much lower and on KTOONEZ kernel and another they BOTH START AS LOW AS 900 for 192 clock and only go up to 1300 for 1890 clock! And furthermore i have since tweaked to run at 800... YES 800mv ON THE 192 CLOCK (STABLE) and all the way gradually up to A LOW 1225mv MAX FOR THE 1890 CLOCK STEP! This runs VERY stable with NO REBOOTS OR FREEZES and I've done full constant stability tests with full scalability for 8+ hours straight...and run a ton of real world activities ( at the same time as ongoing background stability tests) ie browsing, music, videos, widgets without a single reboot, freeze, slow down or hiccup!

This must be why I can average 35-48 hours on both my stock 2100 mah batteries. I can post screenshots for any of what I've posted here.

This is why I'm curious about the strange higher stock voltages for this kernel cuz heck, I've heard lots about this kernel and that battery life could even be better then ktoonez, even with these higher voltage numbers I assume. So I have to give it its fair shot.

And with a few other kernels that have STOCK voltages much lower to start without uv'ing, that's why I was puzzled.

I also have a 4200mah battery on the way so I can't wait to see what kind of life I can squeeze out of that too!

Fyi I have recently setup similar low voltage numbers on this faux kernel (very stable thus far btw) so I will definitely report back with life numbers and screenshots later as well as on the extended battery if it turns out to be of high quality and worth recommending to others to try.

Wow I am so shocked by this! Cuz many people successfully run this phone (on other kernels apparently) below 1000 mv for several steps starting from 192/384 up to around the 810 step! And as low as 800/850 on the lowest couple of steps (this ultimately really assisting with longer life due to most phones and users typically run at the lower clocks most of the time and during deep sleeps, in between the high ondemand app spikes of course.) Much of this can be read and confirmed by other users in the ktoonez Sammy kernel thread and various other threads throughout site.

Now I DO ultimately know that every phone and its hardware is different from user to user and that my specific oc/uv settings may not work for others but I have THREE S3's (2 north American models and 1 international) and they all easily run below 1000mv mark. Plus my friends and other users from this site report fairly good extension of battery life with stable low numbers too.

So once again I'm just curious about the higher stock numbers here but don't discredit them and will comparison test them too. And if anyone wants my specific UV numbers for my clocks just ask and I'll post with screenshots and even phone stability videos if wanted).

Bottom line, so far so good on this kernel FAUX! Very nice work and I like the performance thus far but will test longer first before reporting back with more feedback and stats. (Almost two days at 850mv/384mhz to 1225mv/1830mhz or whatever number your highest oc step is)

Sorry for the long rambling post if u happened to make it through.