yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SunSDK:
Card reader

Thanks but you can run apps from an SD card. If I used my OTG cable with a SD card reader attached with a 16GB sd card will I be able to store and use my apps from there in my Nexus 7?
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mewantnexus7:
No, it's not a "True" SD Card, it still acts like a flash drive.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SunSDK:
So essentially no way of running apps from outside flash storage what so ever? Just movies, pictures and files?
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] theoneofgod:
Right.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] neok44:
correct.

The internal memory setup emulates an sd card by adding an /sdcard directory.

there is no way to have another directory with that name and all apps are coded to store their information in the /sdcard directory. doing it any other way would break the app for all devices.

i can sure understand why you'd want to do that, but basically it's not possible.

best thing i can recommend is to keep all of your videos on external storage since those are the largest files you'll have.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Cosa44:
Just thinking out loud here, but is it possible to rename the internal SD directory? I'm guessing no being that something so conceivably simple hasn't already been done.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mr_tris:
Since you are already rooted you could always try this app it may give you the results you require. Bearing in mind that this was originally developed for the S2.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1410262
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kieso:
SD cards are too slow to run graphic intensive games (especially THD or Gameloft)
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tnimk:
There's are a few threads with how to return to stock, but it mainly describes how to install stock rom.

Whenever I flash a new rom, the files in the "download" directory remains untouched and it looks like other files elsewhere doesn't get touched.

Is there a way to return the unit to absolute original stock condition (not just ROM). That is everything in the unit?

I've been having some issues and installed various roms and such and I wonder if that's why it's acting up.

Thanks!
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MegaNoob:
Power off the device then ,Power and volume down do factory wipe or reset i forget. That should clear the internal memory and put all settings back to original
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tnimk:
I do the factory wipe when installing a new rom, but the files in the "download" directory and other previously created directories for other apps like "zinio" or "perfectviewer" seem to remain untouched. So I wonder if there are other stuff that is not returned to 'stock'?
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MegaNoob:
Well you should be able to delete anything on /sdcard the most it would do is break apps you installed and your pictures and what not. If im not mistaken /sdcard is your internal memory and /removable/microsd is the external. So if you delete the contents of /sdcard then flash stock rom and do wipe you should be back to stock. I did a factory reset and it did clear everything in /sdcard.
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EndlessDissent:
When you do a factory reset in CWM or TWRP, they format all of /data except /data/media/, which is where /sdcard is mounted.

You will need to flash the stock ROM, which should install the stock recovery also (if not, find the stock recovery image, and flash it). Then, like the previous poster said, boot into the bootloader and do a factory reset from there. The stock recovery will erase everything in /data, including /data/media, and it will erase your internal storage.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dead soul:
Hi

Im currently running on CM9 Nightlies on Samsung Galaxy S II I9100. I have seen people saying the Siyah Kernel is one of the best out there and many people across forums like it.

My question is if I flash this KERNEL what happens when I flash the next nightlies ?? would the Siyah kernel be over written with the nightly default kernel or would remain as is ? :confused:
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] LenAsh:
It will be overwritten. You could try deleting boot.img from the Nightly before flashing (open the .zip and delete, don't extract it), although it might not work - I haven't looked at the script.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] apk_xiz:
no it's fine to flash siyah kernel and if you flash any new room you have to format system and clean delvic cache so it's no problem :)
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Immortalis:
Just flash CM9 and then kernel again.

But if CM9 is secondary ROM, then the kernel will remain without changes.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] LenAsh:
Not true. You do NOT need to format system or clean DALVIK cache before flashing a nightly over a nightly. Get your facts straight.

What's a room?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dead soul:
Thanx for shedding the light...!! I gues will just stick with Nightlies i find they are more matured these days and im better off with them in the long run..!!
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Immortalis:
Ehh. Read my post. I wrote the same.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Sun90:
sorry dude din't see the same, deleted mine:good:
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Vink67:
I have many overheating problem with siyah + CM9. Specialy when i'm surfing or watch video.....

Siyah 3.3.3...
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Immortalis:
Normal for dual-core.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] oka1:
Here is Our new forum.

XDA, the moderators and the powers that be.... have been wrestling with trying to differentiate the Difference between the Code-writing Development and the Quasi-developers that use rom cooking tools or are just porting roms.

To that end we will be going through the development threads in the next couple of weeks and moving the appropriate threads that meet the original code requirement to be placed in this new forum.

Please bear in mind that this is a "Work in Progress" and will take a bit of time to hone and perfect what goes where.

Also, please understand that this does not mean that some developers are on some special pedestal. That is not the case.

I will use an analogy to explain:

A music composer writes an original piece of music. The music composition may be awesome... but his performance of it, may not.

Such often is the case in developers..... often someone comes up with a awesome idea or new code application, but it often ends up being perfected by the use of others putting their creative spin on it.

That is the beauty of The Android Platform and ....XDA provides a fertile field for all to share ideas and collectively improve our experience.

Additionally, we need to provide and track the proper credit to the original code writing Developer and better comply with the GPL requirements of Android......

I hope this clarifys the potential questions

Thanks from the Moderators

~~~ (oka1)~~~
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] meethere:
I though this forum is for all the Samsung original/stock roms :p
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] TheDeadCPU:
TL;DR version.

Stuff you've made. Pure AOSP ROM's you've built from sauce. Or a AOKP ROM you've buildt.

"Cooked" ROMs, like taking a TouchWiz ROM and just adding some APKs etc is not original developement.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] antiochasylum:
So does my Asylum ICS count as original? Since every version is built from source? And then modified to my liking?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] parthpatels007:
AFAIK, Asylum will be considered as a cooked ROM with AOKP/CM9 as the base
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] sujal:
Saw this sometime back in HOX forums and liked the idea. Glad it's here in Note's forums too. If not anything, it will make the development forum a less pain to search, at least it was for me. Now I can look up to the original ROMs here, and their derivatives in the other section. Cool enough! :D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] Kangal:
FIRRST!!!

Ah shoot!

Liking this idea, but it means an extra click for my daily routine, heh

This should be labelled "AOSP ROMs" and the other "TouchWizz ROMs" for better clarification.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] M3TALLICA:
Good to see a separate forum. Now it is well organized and less cluttered.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] nickshertzer:
IMHO - any ROM or kernel built from source should be in original development.

I mean, with parth's logic, CM9 isn't original development as it uses AOSP as base...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] Lizzo:
^lol good point there :good:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] anonymous572:
Sorry, but your development forum separation is a pain in ass for me. I don't want to open two pages instead of one to see all news about ROMs. This is really stupid and uncomfortable. I don't care who made ROM and which way it's done. I just wan't to find ROM thread, and that's all!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] M3TALLICA:
Use your hands.

This is how it should be. If you want only COOKED ROM THREADS go to the old Development Section.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] hagba:
This Forum is a very good idea as I know exactly where I will be heading now.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] darkoctavius:
+1 here, i think the developers and "porters" deserves the same credit, Developers for Develop new features and Porters to make speddy ROMs.

with this, new members can be confused (thinking that many do not read the rules and announcements)

Just my opinion...But the moderators has the decision

Cya
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] aussiebum:
How do we request certain threads to be moved from Android Dev -> Original Android Dev and vice-versa? The few that have been put here appear to be a bit random...

eg. If GL_NOTECORE kernel is considered "original" dev, then why isn't the Goku kernel also here? Both of those are based off Speedmod K3-3 after all...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] kopitalk:
It is what it is. Let the mods do the job. I never lose my threads simply because I subscribe them under my favorite folders. Quite a smooth transition. I was not even aware some of the threads are moved here :) Now I know why there is separation in GT-I9100 sections.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] ThaiDai:
New members get confused because they do not read. The number of subforums (5 or 6) won't add much of confusion.

I'm happy with this new structure. I got a little bit tired from too many innovative ROMs with tweaks, themes, addons and - my favorite - boot animations. Even Kernels start to spread (like clones of hardore's SpeedMod).

Now I start every morning with the OAD forum looking for real changes.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] Sine.:
Couldn't agree more.

If you know what you do, you can report them.

Not really, GL_NOTECORE is based on Samsung source (with inspirations from hardcore and others), while Goku kernel is based specifically on SpeedMod kernel :
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] g.lewarne:
Actually, both my own and Funky81's kernel (Goku) are both built from source with original development.

We are simply applying a patch that hardcore made for the original code source release which address some issues that we would have had to address anyway. there is no point in re-inventing the wheel. In my latest releases built from the newer source I am not even applying hardcores patch, just grabbing a few alterations that were made so the code compiles properly.

In fact, both of our kernels are vastly different from Hardcore's in respect to what we are trying to achieve with them. I am going for all out speed, and had to devise my own code (and follow the horrendously awful Exynos4 for developers manual from Samsung) to inject the correct overclocking PLL and register values into the code. This is not something that Hardcore, or anyone else apart from Thor (for cm9) has done with the kernel.

funky has made lots of alterations too, so neither of our kernels can really be called "speedmod clones" and to do so, without reading at the very least the OP of each thread and understanding what is being said, is a little disrespectful.

To follow another analogy along the lines of oka1's from the OP

If speedmod is building the basic car, Funky81 and myself are designing the turbo, exhaust system, air intake and tuning the ECU and packaging it all together. Both are as important as each other and both are original.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] Sine.:
Thanks for your explainations. (out of thx for today)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] azzledazzle:
i thank him on your behalf :p
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] reinbeau:
Thread cleaned

Gentlemen, the topic is Note Original Android Development, not the XDA app.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] :
wondered where they went,

one enhancement tip why not make a cooking section for derivatives and a true development for original/sources :-)

edit; rereading my comment, its already like that, I meant call it that way:-)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] altae:
Why can't I access the new forum with tapatalk/ xda app? Is this planned to be fixed any time soon?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] kitrax59:
Unsubcribe - Subcribe.. If not, Unsubcribe, clear cache of XDA/Tapatalk app.. Subscribe..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] alekhkhanna:
LOL. I posted the same and my post was deleted ! :confused:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] Higgsy:
Don't see the point in 2 different threads for development, its all development in one way or another, I think most members are clued up enough to be able to differentiate between what is original development and what is not.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] altae:
It's even simpler than that. It's enough to browse the full list with all devices and select the note forum instead of using the shortcut regular visitors might have stored as a favourite. This way the new original development forum is shown. Replace the old shortcut with a new one and you are done.

Sent from my Galaxy Note running ICS
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] BeeGee_Tokyo:
Don't get it:eek:

I build my ROM from CM9 and Android sources. I change the source code in some apps and add/delete some apps to make my ROM unique.

So what is it now?

Android Development (because based on CM source)

Original Android Development (because I build from source and make my changes in the source code)

????

Confused.:rolleyes:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] cook:
Very bad idea

This difference original / not original is meaningless for a open source software.

This principle of open source is everybody can freely modify and improve code from others so nobody, never, build something "original" because nobody build from scratch "blank page"

If want categorize, category like kernels / ROM TW / ROM non-TW sould be better I think.

I believe most people will say "very good Idea" because come from moderator and most of people like to put cream of people with some special "power" human being is like that.

But not. it's bad idea.

It will be impossible to decide which one is original which is not. And impossible to guess for visitors.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] Rocheau:
Not a good idea, INMHO. So, what do you expect making like that? Most people comes here looking for a ROM to install in their phone ( expecting to improve from stock) , in this case in their Galaxy Note, and they do not know the differences between an original development ( what is original?) or not original or at least, they do not care about it. So to split the forum in two sides for the same thing - from the users point of view) just make more difficult to do what it was simple before.

It seems to me that you have only applied the developer point of view, and not the user p. of view.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] Sine.:
This is XDA-Developpers, not XDA-Consumers.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] reinbeau:
Precisely. Anyone who believes otherwise is in for a very bad experience here on XDA. Not a threat, just a fact.

Sent from a state of Serendipity
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] clandestino123:
I'm not sure why the thread "stock kernel for N7000" is in this forum?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] Sine.:
Rules to Posting in this forum :
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] altae:
I'm also not really impressed by the logic of the new structure. If it's necessary to split up the development forum why not according to subjects? E. g. a forum for kernels, one for roms, one for mods... this would be far more logical than the current solution. For example, why is the goku kernel in development and notecore and speedmod are in original development? Or the stock rom thread, what is "original development" about this thread? It's nothing more than a collection of stock roms. If that's "real" development I'm a developer to, I'm perfectly able to download roms from sammobile.com and post them here :) But it's not my forum/ website so I cannot do anything more than express my opinion. If the powers to be don't agree that's ok.

Sent from my Galaxy Note running ICS
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] cuba462:
good idea

it's a good and sane idea
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] sbnaul:
Shouldnt Franco's kernel be here ???
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] cook:
I posted exactly same opinion here. My post was deleted. Seems only post say "good idea" are allowed.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] icl0udn3t:
i will do my best to read more than i ask ^_^
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] drkalo:
Couldn't agree more! Kernel/rom sections would be better. ... Make a poll of you're interested in the users' opinion.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Original Android Development] iiiox:
Can't agree with you anymore!

It's really easy to understand if the purpose to divide the forum is for EVERYONE's good.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hsotnas:
Hello Guru's,

Please recommend any themes, launchers for CM9 Beta 8 running on Galaxy Ace S5830.

@ Moderators,

If this post doesn't belong here, then kindly move this to appropriate forum section.

Thanks in advance
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Xcutionr:
Why are you still.using Beta 8? Beta 9 is available.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hsotnas:
I flashed beta 9 y'day however, battery life literally sucks :( Battery drains completely within couple of hours :(

Hence, I switched back to Beta 8.

Thanks
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dj_mol3y_x8:
I use epic blue theme in beta 9 and it is very nice.

P.s how much better is battery life in beta 8 as I not used it first rom on my ace was beta 9. I tryed paranoid Android but apps2sd not working
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hsotnas:
Thanks dj_mol3y_x8, I will give that theme a try.

CM9 Beta 8 gives me almost 40 hours of battery time. Those 40 hours includes 90 min of phone calls, playing Solitaire around 1 hour, listening to music (headphones on) for around 1 hour or so while traveling.

P.S. I use Advance Task Killer Pro and I have set AutoKill mode to aggressive.

Thanks
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] NimeniAltu:
That kills all your juice.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hsotnas:
I heard similar reviews however, I haven't had any issues so far ;)
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] side_effect:
Would like to recommend holo series and sense 4.0 themes.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] athe_s:
What about this theme ..

I'm on paranoid..

Cobalt cm9
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] K.A.:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1658736
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tomasignacioo:
Use OOM Priority Charger:

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/26814551/A...-Priority-Changer-v1.4-cyanogenmod-beta-9.zip

And Apply in Recovery.

I also felt the same so try it works successfully extends battery life in the beta 9.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hsotnas:
Guys, Thanks so much for the replies... I will try your suggestions.

P.S. Will hit thanks button as well :D
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hsotnas:
Cool Thanks
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hsotnas:
Just an Update.. may not be relevant to this topic however, might help if some one is interested...

Installed CM 10 Alpha 1 JB for Galaxy ACE. OS looks pretty cool However, has few glitches at present.

I have started another thread just in case if you would like to visit and have some suggestions for me ;)

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1793141
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hanxgen3:
launcher

TouchwizUX (http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1730313)

nice and really smooth
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] redeemer175:
Hello xda friends,

my friend recently bought S3 but today something went wrong with rear camera, an error when trying to lunch the camera ( error back call in camera)

the front camera still works. anyone can help me plz

thank you
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JJEgan:
Backup Data and Factory reset .

Or return to Service Centre .##

jje
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] redeemer175:
already did that but still the same
[HTC One X] Chello02:
Under my normal usage, which is very light compared to most, i can easily get 24 hours out of my battery.

After having my phone about 2 weeks, on 5 or so occasions the battery has lost its charge after 2 hours with zero usage. When i see this happening i will restart my phone and it seems to fix the issue however upon rebooting i see a major drop in battery charge. Is this a normal calibration issue or a faulty battery? Do you think i should send it back for a replacement?
[HTC One X] Laurentius26:
I've done some >> RESEARCH for you. ;)
[HTC One X] farnsbarns:
How does that answer the question?

The answer, IMO, is no, that is not normal but could be a rogue app, try removing some apps. Also, have you tried a factory reset?
[HTC One X] Laurentius26:
What I try to make clear is that this is yet another battery thread started while so many threads exist.

The Op could use one of the existing threads don't you think?

It doesn't hurt if the Op does a little research first and the question is pretty obvious to my opinion.
[HTC One X] Chello02:
I have looked through a couple hundred pages of battery threads. While i have seen a handfull of pictures of battery power cliffs like mine, none have seen responses that i could tell. I also posted in the "Battery Stats" thread to no avail. So after my do diligence, i started yet another battery thread.

I have not tried a factory reset. Maybe i'll give that a go.
[HTC One X] Laurentius26:
Well, if you couldn't find it you are probably the only one and because of that

your conclusion could be that it isn't normal. ;)

Your question is to obvious to my opinion, it doesn't make sense.