yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Defy Android Development] jm2k7:
I have a problem with this rom, my wifi works intermittently.

when I'm using the browser, or checking the mail or making any use, after a few seconds or minutes, the wifi turns itself off and on. It never stays on.

I can not download anything from the market because it fails wifi turns itself off, then turned on itself.

I just made the wipes to see if it fixes it, and the problem persists. :confused:
[Defy Android Development] drunk_ryder24:
go to wireless settings,hit menu and select advanced,wifi sleep policy select never and enable auto ip
[Defy Android Development] raphaelpdb:
Hi,

I have a Defy (MB525) with Gingerbread from full SBF this ROM boot in my MB525 with Froyo kernel?

Thanks
[Defy Android Development] meilbox:
no...
[Defy Android Development] jm2k7:
hello had long since passed over here, look I have done that and still fails.

I think this rom has that problem, I think there need to patch something in the system folder. I do not know.

indeed stopped using this rom for that reason, the wifi does not help me, I have tried different brands of routers, and give the same fault.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Stevoxda:
I flashed my galaxy note from polish plus region to open germany ics 4.0.4 official firmware, If there are OTA update in future, will i receive this update automatically??
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Final5k:
if there are updates for germany, you will receive german Ota since you flashed german ICS.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Stevoxda:
Ok thnx
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ayang02:
I'm currently running on yakju 4.1.1 and I think I've accidently messed up my root privileges. I think I somehow messed up my su by clicking the root button in Nexus Root Toolkit 1.5.

Cause:

I've always used Voodoo OTA Rootkeeper to keep my root. I update the SuperUser app via the market and found out that my su binary was out of date. I've tried various ways to update the su binary but gaining root access always resulted in a failure within the SuperUser app so finally I decided to try out the root toolkit. By clicking the root button in the app I think I've only made my situation worse....

Now I'm seeing that my su backup in the Rootkeeper app is messed up and I can't seem to delete it. The RootKeeper app seems to think that I'm still rooted and I can't successfully do the "temp-unroot" as well. Other apps such as Titanium Backup can't detect my root status now....

Can anyone offer any suggestions without re-flashing my image?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] yakalid:
As of Nexus Root Toolkit 1.5.2, I do not see yakju 4.1.1 in the list of supported devices.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ayang02:
I've figured out the solution to my problem: just re-push su & Superuser.apk to /system/su and /system/apps/Superuser.apk respectively.

Basically I referenced this thread: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1531865

Since I already have su and Superuser.apk in my /system (although I think I tainted both files), all I needed to do was grab clean versions of su and Superuser.apk and adb push em through and type "adb shell su" to make the # appear. I was even able to update su binary within Superuser, awesome :good:

Hope this helps with people who are having troubles with Superuser/su not gaining root access.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Matridom:
If you have an unlocked bootloader and the SU binary is still on the phone, this should fix the issue:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1765754

As for the superuser APK, it does NOT need to be moved to the system folder, it just needs to be downloaded from the marketplace and will function if the su binary is present with proper permissions.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ayang02:
I guess it makes sense, the only real issue was my su permissions.

I did this with a locked bootloader btw.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mkeller96:
First of i know the international version works on AT&T but Why is the galaxy nexus not offered from at&t because at&t runs off GSM network which is what the international galaxy nexus runs on if I'm not mistaken so

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jordanishere:
How on earth would a carrier branded, carrier updated, carrier bloated version of the Galaxy Nexus compete with the unlocked, GSM version that will work on Tmo OR Att?

Sprint and Verizon are cdma carriers who's contracted users cant use a GSM device, which is why they have their own versions.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JaiaV:
https://play.google.com/store/devices/details?id=galaxy_nexus_hspa

Because this is better.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
WHY would you ever want AT&T to offer this device???

$350

off contract

is much better than paying $650 off contract or $199-$299 on contract at the carrier. It'd have carrier bloat, logos, locked down firmware (blocked tethering!) and slow updates.

If you seriously want an AT&T branded Nexus, you clearly don't get it...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] chopper the dog:
lol 3 apk's of "bloat".

/me strokes his 32gb unlimited lte nexus :p

good day.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] RogerPodacter:
Why does att do half the stupid crap they do? No one can answer that question. Since Google is selling it unlocked so cheap at $350 that's the deal of the century so just buy thru Google.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
How do you know how many apps AT&T would put on their version given the opportunity to sell it?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] chopper the dog:
It was just in reference to his comparison towards the cdma variants and their bloat. Not what at&t would add.

good day.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
There was no reference at all to Verizon.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JediNinjafication:
Ummm...I'm going to assume since Apple and att pretty much go hand in hand and apple is trying to BAN the gnex with the current patent fight..

Android is upgrading...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
Well, AT&T still sells lots of Android phones. Apple can't tell AT&T what phones to buy, that's the pinnacle of antitrust.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JediNinjafication:
they do sell other Android devices, but NOT the ones Apple is actively going after. And while Apple can't tell them what they can and cannot sell, I think it would be more of a conflict of interest. Yes...iphone has been released to other carriers but at one time att had exclusive rights to the device. Plus, like i said..Apple and att pretty much go hand in hand. while i have never liked Apple, it's good business sense for att. Kind of don't bite the hand that feeds/don't rock the boat?

Android is upgrading...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JediNinjafication:
That and none of the Android phones att has is technically in direct competition with the iphone. Am assuming there is some sort of clause in the contact with them

Android is upgrading...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
They don't go hand in hand anymore... Apple sells the iPhone on AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, and another 5 regional / MVNO carriers in the USA now. Apple doesn't care anymore, they just wanna sell phones. It's a relationship of dependence between Apple and AT&T, simply out of necessity because Apple wants the access to the huge bucket of customers AT&T has, and AT&T just wants money.

How about the HTC One X, Motorola Atrix HD, Samsung Galaxy Note or Galaxy SIII? Not sure what you're talking about. AT&T carries all of the headline Android devices.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JediNinjafication:
There is a gsm gnex. And how does it compete? Try coverage for one! And two..it's a GOOGLE phone..no carrier bloat allowed

Android is upgrading...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JediNinjafication:
clearly you don't get the point of a NEXUS device. Nexus is pure Google..no carrier modification. And i don't have a locked tether. Sweet..gsm faster...where you can pick up the signal. And i wouldn't give att a single penny for anything. Someone asked why att didn't have it. I have my opinion

Android is upgrading...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] dislplin01:
I get great coverage in my gsm version granted the Verizon version might get some better download speeds but as far as everyday use there is not much difference my friend has a Verizon one and real world difference, he pays more s month to have one
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JediNinjafication:
I'm Sprint myself and have no complaints

Android is upgrading...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
Did you even read my post that you quoted? You're not making any sense at all.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lowandbehold:
You international guys are taking this question to a place it wasn't meant to go. The OP is just wondering why AT&T isn't offering it subsidized on contract..not asking for an AT&T branded and bloated GNex. Don't say this isn't possible, because both AT&T and T-mobile offered the Nexus S unbranded. Don't confuse Verizon's BS with the GSM carriers...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Dragn4rce:
To be honest i'd rather have the Verizon Nexus then the GSM Version.

BUT!!! If I was going to be an average user with no root and knew I was buying pure Google. Then yes the GSM.

But If your rooted, u gotta admit, the Verizon nexus is better then the GSM Version.

------------------------------------------------------------------

If I have helped you.... hit that sexy thanks button. ^_^
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] dislplin01:
I think a lot peoples thought is who cares ?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lowandbehold:
That makes no sense at all.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
I'm not international.

We're answering his question by telling him that there is absolutely no reason why you should want a subsidized carrier branded AT&T Galaxy Nexus. At $350 off contract I don't know why you'd want to go to a contract one. And this late in the game, AT&T won't be picking it up.

Usually CDMA gets associated with carrier bloat and BS, but AT&T does most of the same things as Verizon even though they're GSM.

---------- Post added at 05:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:39 PM ----------

Why?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lowandbehold:
Obviously you didn't have a Nexus S. He wanted it so he could get it for under $200...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Pirateghost:
my understanding is the OP just wants to know why he cant order a nex through AT&T and have it added to his bill....like you can do with their other phones and like you can do on verizon/sprint......

pretty sure it has nothing to do with wanting bloat/carrier branding etc. dude might not be able to spend the money to googs but can add it to his bill and pay it out.....
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
If he has an upgrade available on AT&T, he'd actually

make money

buying a 4S on contract and selling it on eBay then buying the GNex from the Play Store.

Not to mention that when you buy the unlocked GSM Nexus you don't have to stay with AT&T anymore. You can use it on T-Mobile or one of the dozen AT&T MVNO carriers and cut your bill in half. People need to get past this idea of a device subsidy being a good thing. It just masks the costs of devices and you end up getting screwed in the long run by your contract.

So take your choice. Save $150 up front and pay $60 more a month for 2 years, or just buy it for $350 and print money all the way home in savings on service.

---------- Post added at 05:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:45 PM ----------

Of course he doesn't want carrier bloat (what self-respecting person does?) or tampered firmware and delayed updates, but that's what he'd get with an AT&T branded Galaxy Nexus. If you can afford over $100/month on phone service and $200 on contract, you can surely afford another $150 for an unlocked Play Store Galaxy Nexus.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lowandbehold:
Ok, nevermind..it is clear you are just looking for an argument. Obviously he wasn't asking for a branded bloated nexus. As for your quoted post, I completely agree, but not everyone knows how to work the system (buying and selling).

ANd read the last ****ing post guy. The AT&T Nexus S was not branded or bloated. Do some research.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
Its not hard to "work the system" as you say. Walk into store, buy iPhone, sell on Craigslist. Done? If you want the phone, get it.

I'm not looking for an argument, I'm trying to explain to people that you shouldn't want a carrier branded locked device. It doesn't make sense financially or from a user-experience point of view. I completely understand what he wants, I'm just saying its short-sighted and ill-informed.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lowandbehold:
once again. Was the at&t nexus s bloated or branded??? Fool.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
Did I say it was? I said AT&T has a track record of wanting branding and bloat on devices. And from what we see with Verizon and Sprint is bloat (couple apps, no big deal), branding (battery door), and firmware to block/catch tethering. AT&T will do the same if they ever sell the Galaxy Nexus (they won't, but just for fun lets say they do).

All of that aside, your point can never be any more valid than mine, as the phone is not for sale on AT&T, so we really don't know what they would do.

---------- Post added at 05:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:52 PM ----------

Never said it was. See above.

And my entire point is that even if AT&T offered the phone, it will never be the exact same as the one you get from the Play Store. Why choose an AT&T one, which will undoubtedly have a compromise

of some sort

, when a perfect GNex is waiting at play.google.com for $350?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lowandbehold:
Oh, oh, I see. Now you can just read the minds of the people at AT&T. They didn't do it with previous Nexus devices, but they would do it now. I'm glad that you can speak for a multi billion dollar corporation. Pointless argument. You make no sense. You have nothing to back up your statement, and don't say I don't either, because I have history on my side.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
History of what? The Nexus One, which wasn't sold by AT&T, and then the Nexus S, which was sold 6 months after the unlocked model at a discounted price as a entry level phone?

How about the fact that I pointed out, which is that Verizon and Sprint both have custom firmware, branding, and some bloat on their GNex? That's just as valid evidence of what AT&T could possibly do. Or maybe just look at every single Android phone that's launched on AT&T that's an abomination of software and firmware.

I think you're the one looking for an argument. Just settle it down. You gotta realize that neither point is either valid or invalid. There's no way to know what AT&T would or wouldn't do with a GNex for certain. Its only speculation, and we'll never know because they just aren't going to sell it.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JediNinjafication:
Dude..the nexus line is PURE GOOGLE! NO CARRIER GARBAGE IS ALLOWED! I can't even get the services that are INCLUDED with my data plan. Regardless of where he wants to buy it or what carrier he wants to hook it up with..CARRIER CANNOT PUT CARRIER APPS, MODS, ETC on any nexus device! That is one of the main reasons people buy them.

And i have not EVER had any carrier stuff on ANY nexus i have purchased unless i found a mod somewhere else and installed it myself

Android is upgrading...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lowandbehold:
FACT: If the Nexus was on AT&T it would get updated directly from Google.

Abomination of software and firmware? AT&T adds some APK's, that has nothing to do with the software and firmware. I think you are confusing OEM's and carriers, which doesn't really surprise me..
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
Dude are you dumb or just trolling? It's like you're kinda agreeing with what I'm saying, but then trying to quote me and act like you're disagreeing. I don't understand.

And carriers

do

put bloat on and change Nexus devices. Look at Verizon and Sprint, end of story.

How can you say that definitively? Every carrier-sold or regionalized Galaxy Nexus in the world gets updated by either the carrier (Verizon, Sprint), or Samsung in conjunction with the local carriers (every non-yakju GSM model, think yakjuxw and yakjujp). There's absolutely no evidence to support that an AT&T model Galaxy Nexus would be updated directly by Google.

There is only 1 model of the Galaxy Nexus that gets updated directly from Google: the i9250 GSM model with yakju/takju firmware. That's it! Now I'm not saying the other ones are Nexuses (they are), but they

are not updated directly by Google

.

Software: AT&T puts ~10 applications that cannot be uninstalled (without root) on every one of its branded devices. Less of a big deal in ICS and later now because you can disable them, but on principle it sucks.

Firmware:

All

branded AT&T devices have special firmware with specific hooks to block/catch tethering, force you onto AT&T WiFi hotspots, and specialized radios that gimp download/upload speeds to prevent you from "abusing" their network. Manufacturers make these tweaks at AT&T's request. These phones are built to order for the carriers.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JediNinjafication:
Android is upgrading...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
I know what the idea of a "Nexus" device is. But here are the facts...

As I note, the Verizon and Sprint models have branding, custom firmware/radios, and some carrier bloat. They are not updated directly by Google because of this.

There are also regionalized GSM devices (think yakjuxw and yakjujp) that while they don't have bloat, they have custom firmware and radios for those regions, and are also not updated directly by Google. They are instead updated by Samsung in conjunction with that region's carriers.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
Yep, aware of this. And your point is? Just because you're legally allowed to root and use custom applications and firmware doesn't mean that AT&T doesn't preload this stuff on their phones.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JediNinjafication:
Ok, I'm done with this conversation. Dude asked a question, i gave my opinion which somehow turned into a bloatware debate on a phone that doesn't install bloat. So I'm out. Peace ya'll

Android is upgrading...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
Hey that's fine. If you don't wanna actually make informed responses and would prefer to just call it at this point then that's fine with me... You've been spouting off random nonsense and not actually replying to anyone this entire thread.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JediNinjafication:
No dude..he asked why they didn't have it. Gave what i THINK would be a reason. Then disputed the fact that the nexus line DOES NOT have carrier bloat because the nexus is a pure google atmosphere tailored towards the developers. Then pointed out that he CAN INDEED take a gsm version gnex to att and they still CANNOT put their crap on it. the original question was answered, not as fact but an opinion. That continued to this verbal tennis match which I choose to disengage from as there are more informative topics I can focus on. Like...catching up on what has been added and/or fixed in the ROM I'm on or if the toroplus theme that was dropped has been picked up again. Or if I can find a thread about which one of my mods is causing the occasional screen issue I'm having.

Android is upgrading...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
I advise you go back through and re-read the posts here. Maybe you'll understand then. Do some research about the Galaxy Nexus and you'll understand why I posted what I did.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] abluetowel:
Because the galaxy s2 can me nexified very easily :p.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JediNinjafication:
Uh...I have one. Think that's all the research I need

Android is upgrading...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
Clearly not. Don't think you really have a very good grasp on the status of updates and firmware on the different versions of the GNex.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JediNinjafication:
actually, i do. I have the sprint model..obviously Sprint has not received the full source/binary or we wouldn't be using a port. Same thing with my ns4g..which THAT debacle was just as much googles fault as Sprints. as a business owner trying to make money, why on earth would i release an update to my customers knowing I would soon be able to make money with the next device would have it? Who would spend cash on a device with the desired system if they could update existing one free? Both being nexus devices I can browse my way here and grab it. What does any of this have to do with the initial question?

Gsm gets updates first since easier and basically made due to international. Cdms is last because or network isn't the same and i believe needs additional tweaks. Either way..who cares. I don't have a phone full of garbage apps I'm never going to use.

And att doesn't offer it because they discourage side loading and third party devices that promote modification. The nexus device is all about modification

Android is upgrading...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jordanishere:
Never made a reference to any of the cdma variants.
[HTC Sensation] Njprince0226:
I know that everyone that bought their phone from tmobile can just update it by going through their settings and doing it but mine can't. I currently have a unlocked tmobile sensation and I have at&t on it and the phone is rooted with a custom rom called Android Revolution HD 3.5.2 by mike1986 and it says my android version is 2.3.4. I have no idea what all of this is but a couple of months ago my cousin did this for me on my phone and now I'm trying to get ICS on this. Is there anyway I can do it? Is there a guide or anything?

Thanks for reading.
[HTC Sensation] ganeshp:
did i forgot to reply ..or did you have another thread like this ..iirc i replied to this question ..correct me if im wrong

if im correct ..please avoid double posting ...im sure some one will answer ...so no need to have an extra thread :D ;)
[Miscellaneous Android Development] ffinder:
Flit Keyboard

I actually have bought 3 Z1's and virtual keyboard is REALLY a pain..

Flit Keyboard makes entering text much easier ! !

Just Eight ( 8 ) >> Huge << Buttons Keyboard..

..that By Easily Sliding You Can Type:

>> All << Alphanumeric Characters And Symbols ! !

No More Accidentally Typing Wrong Characters ! !

Perfect 5..

(this Should Have Been THE Number One Android Keyboard..)

Thanks moneytoo ! !

ff

---------- Post added at 06:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:16 AM ----------

Z1 Android Watch-Phone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z1_Android_Watch-Phone

ff
[Miscellaneous Android Development] m34n1ng:
Ive been thinking about buying the watch to use as a mp3 player, would you recomend it?
[Miscellaneous Android Development] Linuxslate:
Yes, I'm plugging my website, but hey, it's relevant.

I've just reviewed this device at:

http://linuxslate.com/Review_Z1_Android-2.2-Watch.html
[Miscellaneous Android Development] alcuin:
Everything in this thread has been helpful, I just wanted to add my 2 cents.

DPI at 160 looks great. Unfortunately many apps will not fit, including keyboard, phone, and superuser prompt. Either find alternate keyboard and set superuser to auto-grant, or switch back and forth between 120 and 160 as necessary.

I like No Lock, but I find the phone wake-locking all the time until I turned No Lock off. I also like the fact that the time is there in big letters on the lock screen. It's very suitable for its watch functionality.