yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III Accessories] louiej23:
anybody have this case? i cant post a outside link because im under 10 posts.

but if you go on youtube and search: Transparent S Line Hybrid Kickstand Case for Samsung Galaxy S3 i9300
[HTC Vivid, Raider, Velocity] Mjones307:
This is not my work.Tried it out and it works on vivid.http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=28835812

When file finish downloading just tap on file, titanium will pop up and install .Enjoy don't forget to hit thanks button.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, (US Carriers)] lilxflip:
If there any way to close out the browser? When I close the last page, it just shows a blank page and I have to press back to get out of it and not necessarily close out though
[Galaxy S III Q&A, (US Carriers)] dave2metz:
Good question.. I get the same thing with the stock browser. I thought it was something I did, but I guess not. I have my homepage set at Google.com, but when I have multiple pages open and I close them out, the last page is blank. It even says blank as the Web address. I would like it to always end with my Google homepage. Not sure if this is possible... Just a bit annoying!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Heeter:
Hi all,

My screen is flashing.. Cm9 beta 1.. Any ideas?

Heeter
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] UZ7:
Are you using any custom kernels or tweaking programs?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Heeter:
Yes using custom kernel. Also using the aroma flash.

Instigatorx kernel

Thanks

Heeter
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] IEatKittys!:
Flashing different colors when you touch? If its that you probably checked Show Screen Updates under Developer Options
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] UZ7:
What version of instigatorx are you using? I had graphic glitches as well but that was with an older version of the kernel, updated to 5.0/5.1 and it went away. :good:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Heeter:
Yeah, I am using 4.0b (Was working properly before CM9 went beta)

I reinstalled Beta 1 CM9, and the problem went away, will update kernel to 5.0/5.1 right away

Thanks

Heeter
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] sk8erwitskil:
Whats in the extras menu?

- change bootanimation

(this lets you select a bootanimation form your internal sdcard. it backs up your current bootanimation to /{internal sdcard}/clockworkmod/ba_backup/. it only backs up the original bootanimation so if you keep changing your bootanimation you will still only have your original one in ba_backup.)

- enable/disable one confirm

(this makes it so you only have to scroll through one confirm selection when installing something instead of having to go through 10 of them to click yes)

- hide/show backup & restore progress

(this makes it so the progress bar when you backup/restore doesnt show up and makes backups/restores a bit faster since it doesnt have to show you the progress and files its backing up)

- select android_secure on internal/external

(use this to select where you have .android_secure. default is internal, so if you have it on external make sure to choose this once to set it up)

- aroma file manager

(file explorer)

- create custom zip

(this will create a custom rom from the currently installed files you have on your phone. it takes your /system partition and /boot partition and makes them into a zip file ready to be flashed. the end product will be in clockworkmod/custom_rom/. this has recently been fixed to work on all phones/roms

- choose custom openrecoveryscript

(read THIS)

- recovery info

(shows the version of recovery and the build date)

- Special Backup & Restore

(backup and restore your kernel/boot and /misc partitions)

- Misc Nandroid Settings

(change time zone, turn preload support on/off (default is off), enable md5 checking)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] BaconStep:
I used the odin install and now I cant boot into recovery at all. just goes to a black screen.

its fixed now
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] sk8erwitskil:
let me take a look.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] sk8erwitskil:
almost fixed. uploading now
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Decepticaons:
watching this
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] scottx .:
Hope to check this out soon! Gotta wait for a more stable release though.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] lnfound:
Slightly off topic but what are the benefits in upgrading CWM? I'm on 5.5.0.4 touch and have always disregarded upgrading with each phone I root as they all seem to function the same.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] sk8erwitskil:
Mostly bug fixes and compatibility issues.

This should be ready soon! Gweedo and utkanos are working on it as well so something good is coming :-)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] sk8erwitskil:
augh yes! i fixed it and its running smooth as buttah!!! ill add recovery.img and recovery.tar.md5 later but there is a flashable zip in the OP. just flash in recovery.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Dismal Shadow:
When wiping davlk, it throws like it was on CWM 5

E:unknown volume for path [/sd-ext]
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] sk8erwitskil:
yes thats expected. i dont know how many times this has been talked about. /sd-ext is a legacy option in cwm that was used for apps2sd. if you can find a cwm that doesnt show that error i would be shocked. the only reason it doesnt do it on my 5.5.0.4 touch recovery is because i took out the part where it prints it to the screen so people would stop asking about it. lol. :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] RiNo808:
You are awesome, we need you over on the gsiii side...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Gotroot:
Will this work for the t989?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] casonswag:
Yea it should i flashed the first one put up and it wrked on my t989
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] sk8erwitskil:
yes it will work. but the fix permissions might not work. i have to make one specifically for the hercules. thats my project tomorrow.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] garydv2002:
So just to clarify. Download zip. Flash in current cwm touch and that's it?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] sk8erwitskil:
Yessir
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] deezhemi:
no poaching our devs! :eek: :p :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] sk8erwitskil:
Heh.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] derrzredeem:
Hi guys,

I've searched but found nothing relevant, so this is my last resort. Hope someone can help me with the issue i have here,

So...I add an extra button to my navbar but i also managed to break video camera :/

Camera, panoramic, and preview is working, but every time i change it to video camera it FC.

Is there anything I could do about it to fix those FC?

A change in SystemUI perhaps?or maybe in GalleryGoogle or is it GoogleGallery?

Any help would be greatly appreciated :)

Thank you.

~drz
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] derrzredeem:
hmm..it's not GalleryGoogle.apk that breaks, it's something in the SystemUI.

I just don't know what it is...

I swap GalleryGoogle.apk from a working themes, and it still won't work.

Anyone?

I/ActivityManager(14235): START {act=android.media.action.VIDEO_CAMERA flg=0x600
0000 cmp=com.google.android.gallery3d/com.android.camera.VideoCamera u=0} from p
id 16201
W/WindowManager(14235): Failure taking screenshot for (328x583) to layer 21015
V/camera (16201): stopPreview
E/CameraHAL(16186): Adapter state switch PREVIEW_ACTIVE Invalid Op! event = 0xf
V/StateManager(16201): startState class com.android.gallery3d.app.PhotoPage
D/OrientationManager(16201): lock orientation to portrait
V/videocamera(16201): mDesiredPreviewWidth=1280. mDesiredPreviewHeight=720
V/videocamera(16201): startPreview
V/videocamera(16201): Video snapshot size is 2592x1458
D/dalvikvm(16201): GC_CONCURRENT freed 4027K, 18% free 18888K/22983K, paused 1ms
+3ms, total 25ms
D/CameraStorage(16201): External storage state=mounted
D/ActivityBase(16201): set CameraRelativeFrame as Rect(90, 0 - 630, 960)
D/PhotoView(16201): compensation = 0, CameraRelativeFrame = Rect(90, 0 - 630, 96
0), mCameraRect = Rect(90, 0 - 630, 960)
I/GalleryEGLConfigChooser(16201): Config chosen: R5 G6 B5 A0 D24 S8 ID7 CAVEAT12
344
I/GLRootView(16201): onSurfaceChanged: 720x1216, gl10: com.google.android.gles_j
ni.GLImpl@4172fb60
I/GLRootView(16201): layout content pane 720x1216 (compensation 0)
D/PhotoView(16201): compensation = 0, CameraRelativeFrame = Rect(90, 0 - 630, 96
0), mCameraRect = Rect(90, 0 - 630, 960)
D/dalvikvm(16201): GC_FOR_ALLOC freed 191K, 12% free 20324K/22983K, paused 16ms,
total 16ms
I/ActivityManager(14235): Displayed com.google.android.gallery3d/com.android.cam
era.VideoCamera: +281ms
D/dalvikvm(16201): GC_FOR_ALLOC freed 8K, 7% free 21515K/22983K, paused 23ms, to
tal 24ms
D/dalvikvm(16201): GC_FOR_ALLOC freed <1K, 2% free 22714K/23111K, paused 15ms, t
otal 15ms
D/dalvikvm(16201): GC_FOR_ALLOC freed 6K, 3% free 24019K/24519K, paused 34ms, to
tal 34ms
D/dalvikvm(16201): GC_FOR_ALLOC freed 5K, 3% free 25217K/25735K, paused 17ms, to
tal 17ms
D/dalvikvm(16201): GC_FOR_ALLOC freed 1K, 2% free 26417K/26951K, paused 16ms, to
tal 16ms
V/StateManager(16201): destroy
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] No_Nickname90:
I have a thought that I think OEM's should consider. I'm in love with Qwerty phones. I mean I ALWAYS mess up when typing on software. No matter how good the keyboard. I just hit the most stupid letters. LoL!!

Anyways, my idea is based off something I seen for the iPhone and it's millions of 3rd party accessories. It's a detachable keyboard. I thought that was the coolest idea ever. So OEM's should make detachable keyboards for those who want them. I wouldn't mind using a keyboard on my E4GT. I mean, I really wouldn't mind the size that I'm sure it would add.

I'm sure if the OEM made it the keyboard would be expensive, but that's one thing I'm willing to spend no more that $50 for. =.P
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] cnstarz:
i like hard keyboards too and the added real estate from not having a soft keybaord displayed on the screen. i thought i would miss it dearly when i replaced my samsung moment with the OG evo. NOPE! swype and swiftkey make me happy.

it would be nice if there was a way to specify which keyboard to use when in landscape and portrait modes. i'd like use swype in portrait mode, but swiftkey when in landscape.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] kidhudi:
How do you feel about this idea for the camera app. A tap for a single pic a double tap for burst shot and press and hold for panoramic. Shot.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] ideseth:
That is an amazing idea! Not sure about the panoramic but the burst...how has this not happened yet?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] krisI0N:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...gle&utm_medium=organic&utm_term=root+keyboard

Hope that helps.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] crawrj:
They make Bluetooth keyboards. I tried a Logitech one and it worked good. But I like Swype and carrying around a keyboard isn't practical for me.
[General Questions and Answers] bradtn:
I have a question about 3g frequencies among all carriers. If I have a device for example which supports these Frequencies

Device:

2G Network GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900

3G Network HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100

And say I wanna use this device on T-mobile

T-Mobile USA 850/1900 for 2G/EDGE - 1700/1900 3G/HSPA

And I am only receiving EDGE on T-mobiles network is this because I am missing the 1700 frequency on my device? For all carriers listed 3g frequencies must the phone your using have both those frequencies to be able to get a 3g signal?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dsfletch:
Can my SGH I777 get 4G LTE speeds?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Pirateghost:
i bet if you did a basic search you would find that the i777 is NOT an LTE device, since, you know, it doesnt have the HARDWARE to support LTE.....

SMH
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dsfletch:
Somewhere I was aware it was not even a full 4G phone, but at the moment i'm just a bit pissed off because of that. I should have waited for the skyrocket. Sorry for the extra thread.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] snipe2nite:
Why be pissed you have the better phone..... You will never get more then 2mbs from any web site i777 is capable of that...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Pirateghost:
while i can agree that the i777 is the better of the 2 after owning both, i have to disagree with your assumption that no website will put out more than 2mbps....

dont let your feelings of another device get in the way of actual facts.

i own and have owned a few LTE devices....i can tell you that LTE speed IS a huge difference and IS a great benefit....

dont put down the device and spout off inaccuracies of how much bandwidth a site will put out.....try them for yourself and see....and try to have an OPEN MIND when you test it out...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dsfletch:
This site and you guys are the bomb. I been hanging around here for some time and have tried about every rom there is, but you can't make the phone better than it is capable of being. Make me feel better and give me just a couple reasons why the SG2 is better than the skyrocket.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] snipe2nite:
So show me a screen shot from your i727 LTE on any web site getting more then 2mbps (NOT SPEED TEST) until then "dont let your feelings of another device get in the way of actual facts and spout off inaccuracies" I will be waiting.....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Pirateghost:
sigh.

OK dude.

go use a goddamn LTE phone....like ACTUALLY use it....

stop justifying your i777 love with bull**** claims...

in case you DONT know me, i sold my 727 a long time ago. got rid of my HTC One X just last week, and I still own a VIVID, nexus, nexus7, i777, galaxytab, captivate, etc etc.....

****ing fanboyism in the i777 section is as bad as iPhone world...

grow up
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] snipe2nite:
First thing I don't give a **** what you have or who you think you are....When you come at me you better come correct or not at all... I never said LTE was not faster I said "You will NEVER get more then 2mbs from any web site" So where is the screen shot tuff guy? Ok so SHOW me on ANY LTE phone you getting more then 2mbps from any site YouTube, Hulu, Netflix your choice just show me the screen shot..... Untill then you're back quite who is the "fan boy" wish I could say more I will leave it at that...Still waiting
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] HerbGirl:
i777 has a better processor than the Skyrocket
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Phalanx7621:
I'm assuming you know he's a recognized DEVELOPER here. And a great guy. Just leave it alone.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] snipe2nite:
Thanks for looking out.....I don't even know if I should respond to this. All I was doing was trying to make the OP feel a little better about his i777..... I'm not here to argue with anybody but if you come at me I don't care who you are. you better have FACTS all I wanted was a screen shot... I stated a FACT, he came at me. What I said is true, even with a 50mbps wifi connection you will only see 2mbps or less... Maybe I took what he was saying the wrong way..... "stop justifying your i777 love with bull**** claims" "****ing fanboyism in the i777 section is as bad as iPhone world...grow up"

Who is to say I even have an i777 or don't have an i747 LTE..... By the way I ******* Hate Apple iSad
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Pirateghost:
Yep. No way in hell any website ever puts out more than 2 mbps, you're right, Internet tough guy.

/end thread. Pointless to argue with an asshole
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Moozh1:
I am also looking to get an i777 or i727. For me the deciding factor is battery life. For those of you that have owned both, can you compare the battery life of these two phones on stock, using the same custom ROMs, etc? I did do searches for comparisons, but not many people are clear that they have owned both phones and used them under similar conditions.

Thanks in advance.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Slavestate:
No man he's totally right which is why I can easily pull 6mbps down from Speakeasy and their WEBSITE speed test hehe.

If you can't pull more then 2mbps on your LTE network uhh you either a) live in a crappy city where everyone and their mother is on the network or b) ATT doesn't have LTE where you live.

Has nothing to do with the phone or any website. If I'm on H+ and not on my home wifi I can only get my max speeds at like 11pm when no one else is on their phone.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Eternalty:
LTE drains more battery than H+ so ur best bet is i777 if u want battery life.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] jcomana:
Hey Dude and immediately Root and install a cooked Rom which improve in addition the battery life. Actually I have installed CM9 with an excellent perfomance. Sorry for disturb your discussion.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Moozh1:
Thanks for the info, but I already know that rooting and debloating helps with battery life. Who I want to hear from are people that have had both the i777 and the i727, and how the battery life compares under similar conditions, including while stock and while using custom ROMs.

Most people who have posted about battery life on one or the other phone were not clear that they owned both at one time or another.

Another factor is that I live near, but not actually in an LTE area. Does the skyrocket battery last longer when not in LTE? I expect that the majority of my time will be in a non LTE area.

Again, I already know all the pros and cons between the i777 and i727 EXCEPT how they compare battery wise (in actual usage, not on paper). That will be the deciding factor for me.

Thanks again for reading.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] devoured321:
I have an i777 and my wife has a skyrocket...I use mine probably twice as much playing games and browsing the web and always seem to have better battery life by 20 percent or better...also if you are going to spend most of your time in an non lte area I would recommend the i777... More roms, better battery..and to be honest..in non lte area a better speed...don't know why but it is....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] elherr:
Since I was farting around I thought I'd check kernel.org.

View attachment 1205813

Seems like they provide a bit more than 2 Mb/sec. :-)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] raduque:
pwnd, right in the face. :good:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] snipe2nite:
That's FUNNY https://www.dropbox.com/s/sbep3c73ki7ps52/Screenshot-30.png
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Pirateghost:
So you are showing us that you know how to max out your 12mbps connection?

Get faster internet, bro
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] snipe2nite:
Thanks for the screen shot I stand corrected 3.1 mbps is more then the 2mbps I stated..... Is the best you could get from kernel.org 3.1? On a i747 in San Francisco getting 10mbps to 20mbps the best I could get is around 2mbps.as stated... If you were just being cool schooling me then I'm sorry..... If you were trying to be a punk well then we will meet again....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dsfletch:
The problem for me is AT&T sells the I777 as a 4G phone when in fact it is not a 4G phone. I emailed support and asked them why I could not achieve 4G speeds on my data plan, and told them that despite what they advertize the phone as it is not a 4G phone. After going round and round with them on several emails they advised me to contact Samsung. Samsung told me without question the phone is 3G and was sold to at&t as a 3G phone. Finally they had to admit the I777 is not a true 4G phone and agreed to trade mine in for a true 4G phone the I727. Whether or not I will be happy with the skyrocket is yet to be determined. The skyrocket does have a bigger screen, bigger battery and bit faster processor. After all the bs that can't be undone I sure hope me and my big mouth are happy with it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Nick281051:
I'm sorry but you are terribly misinformed because the processor on the i777 is far faster than the processor in the skyrocket. Also, at&t advertised many hspa+ phones as 4G due to the way ITU set up its rules . They made it so that hspa+ is technically 4G but it is not a different technology. It's all very confusing.

Sent from my Sony Xperia Ion
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dsfletch:
Without going and looking at the specs, if I remember right the skyrocket comes with a 1.2 duel core processor overclocked to a 1.5. why I would be slower I don't know but if you say it is, I believe you. I used my wife's skyrocket a few times and it seemed speedy enough.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Nick281051:
They are two completely different processors, the skyrocket uses a snapdragon s3 processor which is far slower than a lower clocked exynos. The snapdragon s4 is a completely different story.

Sent from my Sony Xperia Ion
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] elherr:
All blathering about speeds aside, the real advantage of LTE is lower latency. I can get 4 Mb/s in Seattle on AT&T (HSPA+) with a good signal on I777. The RTT is sucky though -- ~100ms. LTE networks average less than half the latency of HSPA+. If you are using your handset for RTP streams (video, audio, etc) then low latency will provide a much better user experience.

For my applications HSPA+ is fine and I'm glad I did not get the ****rocket.

I'm more interested in AMR-WB, commonly marketed as HD Voice. Cell voice quality has been crap for far too long.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptive_Multi-Rate_Wideband

http://www.extremetech.com/electronics/125235-what-is-hd-voice
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] jthatch12:
This thread is pointless and should be closed
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] MotoMudder77:
Then just report it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] snipe2nite:
Thanks for the info and the links lot of good info! I guess I should of said "The best I could get is around 2Mbps on LTE in SF" From your screen shot HOW are you getting 25Mbps downloading on kernel.org?

Why post then in a "pointless thread" and not just close it? So close it then.....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dogfax:
Mostly true, but it sort of is 4G. It definitely is not capable of LTE speeds, and HSPA+ is more like 3.75G, but the rules set forth for mobile speeds indicate that it can be considered 4G. True 4G, as people should expect, is LTE.

Sent from my new and improved SGH-I777 with tasks AOKP!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] elherr:
I cheated. Wifi on Comcast. And kernel.org has some rather fat pipes. The IP stack and hardware on I777 is rather good though.

I just wish there was a tool like 'iperf' that would allow one to conduct decent testing. The apps on Play blow for any serious network diagnostics.

http://sourceforge.net/projects/iperf/

^^Edit: Disregard underlined. I'm an idiot. Iperf is available on Play. Iperf will not work well with cell networks though as they are NAT'd with handsets having a private IP address.

As for your LTE results -- I'm guessing San Francisco cells have some serious network congestion during a good part of the day.

At home I get crap HSPA+ speeds but, then again, my signal is not the greatest and I have a bunch of tourists sucking up bandwidth across the street during this time of the year. Good thing my Comcast connection is reliable.

A couple of weeks ago I was doing some network maintenance in the middle of the night and decided to check HSPA+ speeds on top of Queen Anne and was shocked to get 9+ Mb/s. Blew my mind. Aside from latency, the real limitation on HSPA+ phones is not the handset but the networks it is connecting to.

Queen Anne:

http://goo.gl/maps/dxqO
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Divine_Madcat:
Don't bother - no matter how many times i ask people to REPORT stupid posts, not POST IN IT THEMSELVES. 4 pages, and only ONE report. SMH guys...