yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 7 Original Development] flying_pigs:
Good news: no apparent WiFi issues in the latest version! :cool:
[Nexus 7 Original Development] _motley:
Thanks Metallice. Haha, maybe that was sarcasm...but yeah....definitely using the linaro version in the OP. I can see the linaro name/version etc in the kernel log and in CPU spy.

Once you go Nexus....lol
[Nexus 7 Original Development] gsw5700:
Use temp+cpu widget from the market to monitor battery temperature.

Sent via TCP/IP
[Nexus 7 Original Development] dakoookie:
With Wi-Fi always on?

For mine it's more like 2-4% every 12 hours with Wi-Fi off and doing nothing at all (in the beginning it indeed was better than stock, but over the time it started to lose a bit more). In the screenshot below I didn't use it a lot, about ~3 hours screen on time. In the last bit I used it a bit, then I thought I'd try leaving Wi-Fi on for a few hours just to try how much it would use and the battery went down like crazy...

I didn't change any kernel related settings.

Edit: Does anybody else experience weird touchscreen behavior? Scrolling is all jittery. After changing the kernel it's all good again.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Sage:
hi all installed 244 on my 3g and now my otg usb sticks don't seem to be working. is that expected?

great kernel otherwise very happy
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Sage:
seems like the otg problem is with cmx I just tried the faux kernel and it has the same problem. back to stock cmx kernel and it's working ok again. Bugger I might need to go back to aosp :)
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Sage:
strange got it working natively after a refresh again. how are people adjusting the voltage with this? set cpu doesn't seem to work properly I set it to stupidly low levels and it doesn't crash.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] friedsonjm:
I use Rom Toolbox Pro, seems to work just fine. jf
[Nexus 7 Original Development] bso44:
Anyone know what the stock voltages are on this kernel?
[Nexus 7 Original Development] dbrickg:
I've reduced mine across the board by 100mV, and they start at 700mV for 520MHz and go up to 1137mV for 1.6GHz. So the originals would be 800mV and 1237mV. Let me know if you want the entire list.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] friedsonjm:
My N7 does not let me get away with -100; I'm trying -25, will see how that goes...
[Nexus 7 Original Development] bso44:
Gotcha...thanks.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] ozgreg:
Motley,

Would it be possible to implement the fix for the empty app mounted directories (http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2106480) into your rom?
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Shano56:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

This is a kernel :)
[Nexus 7 Original Development] TheDarkDefender:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

I hope he was kidding :)
[Nexus 7 Original Development] ozgreg:
So I noticed and as a hint if all else fails read all the post :)

"I've also provided a kernel patch that implements a similar workaround within the kernel.:"
[Nexus 7 Original Development] hugo5:
Please integrate the solution for mounting cifs in a new kernel build!

Hi motley!

I would kindly ask you to integrate the following solution for mounting network shares through cifs with a 4.2.1 ROM as posted here http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=36889027&postcount=1 , as it seems to work quite well and as I have your #244 Kernel running rock stable. This would be a highly appreciated extra feature, not only by me I guess.

Thank you in advance!

Hugo
[Nexus 7 Original Development] TheAtheistReverend:
Anyone have any luck with CM 10.1?
[Nexus 7 Original Development] androidkid311:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Yuup using it now with latest motley kernel. Love it!!
[Nexus 7 Original Development] beanaroo:
I think ozgreg was referring to

However, mkasick goes on to say:

So maybe the fix belongs in the ROM.

On a related note, I am unable to get any app CIFS related to work with this kernel. Cifsmanager complains "No such device" (no modules loaded). I am however able to manually mount a nfs share in terminal by means of:

su
busybox mount -t nfs -o nolock ip-address:/sharepath /mountpath

Unfortunately, due to the complications introduced in Android 4.2 (as mentioned here) the whole mounted share thing is futile... for now.

Benchmarking results are outstanding though! Very impressed! Here's hoping for decent battery life.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] navahoo:
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Is it because Trickster not working or Busybox installed in the wrong directory or is it just not possible to adjust GPU speed?
[Nexus 7 Original Development] androidkid311:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

I believe you can't adjust your GPU. :)
[Nexus 7 Original Development] ozgreg:
In regards to CIFS (Samba) mounting in 4.2. CM 10.1 (nightly) build from the 28th of Jan, 2013 onwards has a fix to correct this issue.. I am running CM 10.1 + Motley Kernel for a very smooth experience (with Samba)..
[Nexus 7 Original Development] navahoo:
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

After two days I'd say that the battery life seems a bit better than with stock CM kernel, but I just experienced a spontaneous reboot yesterday and a faux SOD this morning after taking out out of the dock...
[Nexus 7 Original Development] just lou:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

I switched to this kernel several days ago, and it's been perfect with a couple different AOSP builds I've tried. Battery life, stability, and performance have been excellent.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] knuckles1978:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

I've tried most n7 kernels, and motley is the one that I always come back to. No reboots or anything bad (use a kernel cleaning script before installing), just silky smooth goodness with good battery life. :)
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Blindi1985:
That's realy true - but i wait for an Update.

The last build is from December 17, and meanwhile, much has changed.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] knuckles1978:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

If my n7 is running silky smooth and with no problems then I'm not in a great rush for any update. Ill get it when it's ready. :)
[Nexus 7 Original Development] androidkid311:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

I agree with both posts. Much has changed and can't wait for an update and again everything is super smooth. I just hope development hasn't stopped :) :) . ;);)
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Blindi1985:
But I think so.

If you look at the recent changes to the source on github, they are also a long time ago - August

Check for yourself: https://github.com/motley-git/Kernel-Nexus7/commits/master

Excuse these words. I want this project and this kernel doesn't speak badly, Motley also makes a really great job at Nexus 4 Kernel.

But at the Nexus 7 kernel I see nothing more.

If Motley even once an announcement so that there would be clarity.

Sorry 4 my bad english! :(
[Nexus 7 Original Development] efan3719:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

He's just busy. He has said that he'll get back to it when he can. It's a good kernel as is though.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] just lou:
I'd much rather stick with a 2 month old Motley kernel that works perfectly, than deal with issues I had with "M-Kernel" and the continuous unstable releases and test builds. JMO. YMMV.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Remoteconcern:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

I asked motley in the nexus 4 thread and he said in time he'd return to this kernel and try and being some things he'd learnt from the n4 to this tablet. Something to look forward to.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] TheDarkDefender:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

+1

Been trying every kernel in the forum,but I always come back to this. Excellent battery n performance.

Sent from my Nexus 7
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Metallice:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Yeah those four days it took me to fix a SOD issue was just to much to handle huh?

Why do people always feel the need to shoot down other kernels? Is it so hard to just say I like this one best and be done with it? I also like how you chose to put M-kernel in quotes but not Motley. Very respectful of the hundreds of hours of my free time I put into it. Sigh, I guess that's what I get for browsing the forums.

Sent from my Nexus 7
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Leonhan:
No need to diss anyone here. Mkernel is good and motley kernel is both good in their own right. I like how metallice has been actively changing and improving his kernel. As well as motley having loyal followers. Whatever the difference, we should be happy that both of them are offering their kernels for free. The least we can do is respect them for their hard work. Kudos to these dedicated and good kernel developers. Stop the hate and learn to respect.:good:
[Nexus 7 Original Development] just lou:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

I never said a negative thing about your kernel in your thread. I just stated a fact in this one. It wasn't just " 4 days". I had issues running A33, A34, and A35. Obviously your kernel is popular, but myself and many others have had serious issues with it. You should be applauded for putting out so many test versions the other day trying to fix it and supporting it though.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] FReaKRaNT:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

It's an alpha test kernel. Not a final release. If you can't deal with that then I suggest you go with stock or perhaps an iPhone. Good day sir.

Cheers, FReaKRaNT
[Nexus 7 Original Development] just lou:
You mad bro? Sorry, I have no time for flame wars with noobs, especially if an iPhone reference is the best you can do.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Metallice:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

My mistake. I checked the upload dates. It took me 6 days to fix the instability, not 4. :) Still i just don't consider 6 days to qualify as "continuous test builds and instability". I just think that's an unfair, uncalled for, and inaccurate description to make.

Also, thank you, I appreciate the acknowledgement at the end of your post. I just hope you keep that in mind the next time you make criticisms of others' hard work, despite how innocuous you may believe it to be.

Besides I like Motley's work too. I used his kernel before I forked it early on during his absence to make MKernel. There may not be much of a resemblance any more, but that's still part of its history.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] just lou:
I didn't mean any offense to you or your kernel either. And if you took it that way, I'm sorry. I guess I didn't use the best choice of words trying to get my point across to some people that felt because Motley hadn't updated his kernel in some time, perhaps it wasn't any good any more. When I mentioned "continuous test builds", I was referring to the ones I believe you put out between a34 and a35. I think there was something like 10 in 1 day (which is pretty impressive) lol ;). My point was, speaking for myself, I'd rather have an old kernel that is proven stable, then flashing new test versions all day long. When I mentioned "unstable releases" I was referring to a33, a34, a35, which just did not work right for me. I know my words can be construed as negative towards your kernel, but I thought they would be quite harmless in here, outside your M-Kernel thread.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] bongostl:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Hey all

I don't really care about battery life... But the n7 is feeling slow to me these days.

Is this the kernel for me?

Thanks!
[Nexus 7 Original Development] FitAmp:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Test yourself.

It has pretty good performance in my opinion.

I also have good performance with m-kernel, which I'm currently using and sticking to it

Link here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1937146
[Nexus 7 Original Development] knuckles1978:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

If you don't care about battery life then just put your governor to performance and overclock everything. You soon will care about battery life :)
[Nexus 7 Original Development] skylinegt77:
i think you were truly unlucky for buying a nexus 7 with a low quality soc, ive been using m-k since about a31 and i never had a single issue with stability, even this 3rd one which refuses to be overclocked above 1.5 ghz wont give me sod's or fc's or reboots of any kind. i know many ppl do get em, but its the 2nd replacement n7 i get, and all 3 of them never ever gave me a single 1 of the symptoms some people describe, it is a great kernel, but that for itself doesnt garantee it will work for your device... also i would say my tablets seem to be haunted, the first one would show only coloured bars on the screen after 1 min of runtime, the second 1 had more distortion on the speakers than anything ive seen b4, and this 1 seems to just refuse letting me oc it. different devices will have different behaviours, but the great thing about good devs is they will try anything and everything to make it work on any device. that said, i actualy think we should praise sum1 that spends a whole day building new kernels for us to try to mend our problems for free, not to mention he gave us a better battery life and higher speeds than asus themselves by very very huuuuuuuuge differences even at stock speeds
[Nexus 7 Original Development] just lou:
Not unlucky at all. I can run Clemsyn's Elite kernel at 1.7GHz, with 520MHz GPU all day long without issue. But since it's complete overkill, I only run at 1400/446 nowadays.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] skylinegt77:
i guess it comes down to some kernels being more suitable for some devices then. as i had 3 nexus 7 till now and none of them behaved in the same way with the same mods...
[Nexus 7 Original Development] just lou:
Every system is different. I've built identical PC's that weren't capable of being overclocked at the same speeds despite being 100% identical.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] waz675:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Here's a good explanation from someone (in the industry) giving why we all can't OverClock our systems/devices the same. Basic of basic short is, it all depends where the chip (CPU or GPU, SoC etc) was on the die wafer when made.

Post >>>>> http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=36621063&postcount=1117
[Nexus 7 Original Development] narco14:
Hi, sorry but 2 month without release,it's normal or this thread is close? the build 246 work very well and all is good. This is the best kernel for n7 (for me). Thx for your answers.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] jdmcivic:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

batt life is sickkk..

main usage : tapatalk, web, youtube and movies..
[Nexus 7 Original Development] androidkid311:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Da faaaak!? Lol

---------- Post added at 05:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:41 PM ----------

Not closed. OP is busy I'm guessing. Update will come somewhere down the line. Best kernel right now without a doubt.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Milamber33:
I see a spike up towards the end there, so it was on charge at least for a while.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] jdmcivic:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

nah. i didnt put it on charge.. if i did it'd show up on on the charging column and even if i did charge it, it only went up by 1-2%. how much can u gain from 1-2%?
[Nexus 7 Original Development] knuckles1978:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Yeah sometimes you just get little spikes in the graph like that. I get them after I've been playing a high drain game or something, then switch the game off. It's like the battery feeling relieved or something. :D
[Nexus 7 Original Development] eric-filth:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Motley what the lowest voltage can i set in your kernel?

Because i set 1000mv, later 900, 800 for 1300mhz and works without freeze, is correct? I used System Tuner and Trickster and both share same voltages.

Enviado de meu GT-I9300 usando o Tapatalk 2
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Felnarion:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Check what is using your RAM and get rid of what you don't need. That's about 75% of nexus 7 slowness
[Nexus 7 Original Development] knuckles1978:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

800mV for 1300Mhz seems very low. You had no instability while gaming or anything at that voltage? I wonder if the settings had applied properly. Might try slowly lowering mine, id be interested to hear someone else's voltage settings who is UVing...

That's a big battery saving if what you are saying is correct..
[Nexus 7 Original Development] just lou:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

I can't imagine it being stable that low. I have mine set at a modest -25 for all speeds.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] eric-filth:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Im curious to know if is true, because 800mv is really low

I tried to use 1000mv for 1600mhz and freeze, later i tried 1050mv and works like a charm :)

Unfortunately we need multimeter to know the truth

Enviado do meu Nexus 7
[Nexus 7 Original Development] knuckles1978:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Well I've -100 across the board, so my 1300 MHz is @ 975mV, and its completely stable gaming etc at that.

But eric-filth saying he had his 1300mhz @ 800mV which seems super low, and I'm a bit scared to try it in case I end up in a boot loop when everything is running great for me justnow..
[Nexus 7 Original Development] eric-filth:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

You tried above than 975mv?

If you untick Apply at Boot you dont have problem to test.

Enviado do meu Nexus 7
[Nexus 7 Original Development] knuckles1978:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

When I have gone too far with undervolting before with my galaxy s1, even though I had set on boot switched off it has still ended up bootlooping on me and refusing to even boot into recovery, that's what's putting me of pushing it any further. Don't have the time tonight to get the laptop out if it goes wrong. I'll maybe try it tomorrow.

Edit: I just tried it and 925 is my lowest, go below that and it locks up instantly, so I left it on 975, don't want to leave it on 925 or 950 because chances are it will crash when gaming or something.

So my full range is now 700mV@520 - 1137mV@1600
[Nexus 7 Original Development] eric-filth:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

So looking your words, i have to believe that undervolt is working, so my under works @ 800mv with 1300mhz, but at same time is hard to believe what my device have a premium SoC.

I will investigate more about that.

Enviado do meu Nexus 7
[Nexus 7 Original Development] kabuki05:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Use antutu benchmark stability test. Mine works -125mv in all frecuencies estable.

Enviado desde mi Nexus 7
[Nexus 7 Original Development] BigJermZ:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Question....android beam is supposed to work with this kernel right?

I have stock rom and build 244 and when I try to beam anything it goes to the play store...any one else having this issue?

Seems to not be as compatible with other types of galleries...same app must be installed. My S3 has samsungs version of the gallery vs stock. But if I install any third party apps on both devices it works fine.

Weird...
[Nexus 7 Original Development] comfuzio:
Does anyone here tried to flash 4.2.2 with this kernel? I get failed all the time :(
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Remoteconcern:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Reflash stock boot.img and system.IMG without wiping data
[Nexus 7 Original Development] comfuzio:
And after that this kernel again right?
[Nexus 7 Original Development] FReaKRaNT:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Most of the update in 4.2.2 is kernel related. There is no point in updating to 4.2.2 if you are going to flash this kernel. It will put you right back to 4.2.1

Cheers, FReaKRaNT
[Nexus 7 Original Development] just lou:
You need to get back to completely stock to flash the 4.2.2 OTA update. After you do that and get a custom recovery installed again (if necessary), you can flash this or any other compatible kernel you like.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Remoteconcern:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

It would be better to wait until motley updates to 4.2.2 kernel sources. Hope that helps.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] comfuzio:
Thanks for your answers :)

I'll wait for new kernel first to be 100% sure for compatibility :) it's kinda hard to see my N7 without this kernel :victory:
[Nexus 7 Original Development] narco14:
Hi all, for you what is the best rom with the motley kernel ? Thx for your answers
[Nexus 7 Original Development] knuckles1978:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Any ROM that you've tried and like. No one can answer that for you. Flash some and try them.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] narco14:
I try the xylon rom for my Nexus 7 since one month. Thx
[Nexus 7 Original Development] androidkid311:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Just wondering. If I want to make interactive scale less aggressively . using trickster what would I adjust?? In the governor control of course
[Nexus 7 Original Development] bjcrj:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Increase above_hispeed_delay, lower hispeed_freq, lower min_sample_time.
[Nexus 7 Original Development] androidkid311:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

Thanks mate :)
[Nexus 7 Original Development] Leonhan:
Does this kernel run on 4.2.2?
[Nexus 7 Original Development] midnight assassin:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][Linaro][1.6GHz][UV][GPU+][3G][ZRAM][SIO][4.1/4.2] motley 2012-12-17

About 90% sure it does.