yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MuertoKo:
Lol harunjo I can't even report if you release that fast :P Will delay my reports for tomorrow to report about beta 4.

And yep, noticed nothing good on latest ondemand to peasusq tweak here, so worth reverting imho.

Moreover I noticed no higher drain with hardcore tweaks, so kinda brightness hits just few on battery :) Keeeep testing :D
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ph3nom:
agree too fast to report, lol.

I notice cpu 2 and 3 not offline when running 200 mhz, and with franco mod it was, however, franco mod cause lag when waking up phone. noticeable with ripple effect on the lockscreen.

wierd thing with franco mod as it should save more battery but it cause more drain compare to normal pegasusq. if i compare my phone during deep sleep.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ksr007:
V40 beta 3 is very good, also i will testing v40 beta 4 now !
[Galaxy S III Android Development] hieupham:
Oh Boss my beta 3 hasnt settled down on the system and here it goes the beta 4 :D

flashing it now hehe
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
fyi

franco mod is for performance not for battery
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
i thought there is no beta tester anymore here..every body go to jelly bean rom lol...

sorry had to release this beta4...have little improvement from 4.042..and also i found typo in my post init script..again :D
[Galaxy S III Android Development] walda:
Have to say bye for a hopefully short time, I flashed the JB-Checkrom.

Coming back asap! Looking forward to it :(

... tap*talked
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MuertoKo:
I'm testing JB ROMs as well but as daily driver I will keep ICS until final release comes up ;) I like Romow theme but still I want a proper kernel on my JB :P
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Chillz88:
Cant wait for jb too.... this kernel is still solid.. lost 1 percent in 4hrs idle from 100 to 99percent..... on beta4. ... :)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
lol..that JB ROM really seducing ...have been convert the JB ramdisk for beta4 kernel...yes , i know that a silly idea..but its was booting ...but with blank screen LOL...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] jothi2lingam:
Beta3 already good... But only core still running in 200mhz...Not in deep sleep.... Anyway damn gud batter saving without 3g/wifi.... Now have to test beta4
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MuertoKo:
What do you mean by online core running at 200MHz? You are not having deep sleep? Can you share your CPU spy or better battery stats logs? :)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ph3nom:
But wierd tho, i got lag with ripple effect on when waking up phone. but with beta 4, the lag gone.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
that still an experimental patch from franco..thats why i remove that tweak...

i am also notice since 40beta-xx...the wake_rlan..is not appeared anymore even with noisy or bad wifi signal....how about yours?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MuertoKo:
Will check it today at work as I have kinda noisy wi-fi here ;) But yep, at home it isn't happening on any of the routers, thought it was due to having people in my building on vacation or something O.o (less routers = less noise).

Will check properly :D
[Galaxy S III Android Development] jothi2lingam:
Anyone feel home screens swiping laggy on beta4
[Galaxy S III Android Development] hieupham:
No lags in screens swiping detected :D

CheckROM 5HD with stock LH1 Modem and beta 4 pretty solid perfomance
[Galaxy S III Android Development] jothi2lingam:
For me not that smooth... Using Wanam 2.2
[Galaxy S III Android Development] pidz:
Silky smooth on v4 Beta4. Very nice indeed.

I see you have fixed to Voltage values in setCPU, very nice work dude, will mess around with the phone and test alot of things.

But so far, very nice, keep up the good work sir :good::D
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
my battery performance with beta4
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ph3nom:
what rom are you using harunjo?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
check your sysctl.conf...wanam have put his cpu tweak there..also with his JB rom..
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
i am using stock rom with bloatware removed

edit sorry: i am using wanam lite v2.1 with removed bloatware
[Galaxy S III Android Development] jothi2lingam:
Dude in which system folder have this tweak
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MuertoKo:
system/etc/ ;)

He has some ipv4 tweaks and some more, which ones should we delete harunjo? I'm not using any of them but just curious which one could afftect performance :P
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
just remove that file completly..reboot your phone..and see if that file still there after remove and reboot
[Galaxy S III Android Development] jothi2lingam:
Bro I can't find the file in that folder... Pls check the screenshot
[Galaxy S III Android Development] JYJY:
I'm using wanam 2.2 and I have the file that you're missing.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MuertoKo:
R u using Wanam or CheckROM? Wanam does it this way, maybe other dev's put them on another way :)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] jothi2lingam:
Confirmed its Wanam rom bro...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] samaxen:
V2.2 don't have sysctl.conf. Check for int.d folder. Remove files from there

For me V2.2 runs perfect no lag or nothing great battery life as well with beta4
[Galaxy S III Android Development] tandem2:
Wifi Standy

Thank you for the great kernel.

One problem with wifi standby: the sip connection is lost (csipsimple). If I use the phone sip will reconnect. Wifi is always on in wifi settings.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
did you got same problem with stock kernel?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] gh.rohit:
thanks harunjo for helping me and teaching me basics of kernels :)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
you are welcome dude..i hope you can build your own kernel later..
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MuertoKo:
So weird ! Well at least better, no need to remove anything LOL
[Galaxy S III Android Development] tandem2:
Thanks for the quick answer.

No, I can't remember.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
maybe you could test it first with stock kernel..because i cannot test that for you ,i dont using sip here
[Galaxy S III Android Development] mariosraptor:
Now this is what iam talking about.

I am on wanam 2.2.

Using beta 4 with -75mv on each step and after i deleted wanam's script from init-d folder i can see significant improvement bothe on laggyness-stuttering as also in stand by.

After 5 hours and 30 mins with the worst signal possible i have lost 1% battery!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Chillz88:
Even checkrom has init.d scripts...

Is it recommended to remove these?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
as far i know my init.d is only work with 11xx file name.....so ithink that tweak is no longer working anymore
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ph3nom:
So harunjo i have this script in my folder are these necessary script? And with 11 at the frontlike that to make it work?

-----------------------
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
you need to check inside..and see what kind of tweak..after that..if you think that tweaks are necessary for you..then you can rename the file name to 11xxx
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Chillz88:
so i just have to rename the init.d scripts as 1199complete and 11s98checkboost or so?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] jay_snake:
Which app is that to control the voltage?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
yes,you are correct!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] pidz:
@Harunjo.

Kernel is awesome dude, no problems at all, v4 BETA 4 is best yet.

Tested on multiple games. Mostly gameloft, no problems.

Generic stuff like messaging, facebook, calls, browsing etc, no problems.

No undervolt or underclock done as yet, seeing how it is as standard. So far, 1Day 2hours 31m on battery ~ 20% left. going well.

Have you applied any undervolt to the GPU, buses etc? :p

Thanks again for your hard work dude:victory:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
nope all gpu and buses is also with stock voltage
[Galaxy S III Android Development] mariosraptor:
System tuner pro. Bought it cause tegraks overclock ultimate stopped working after 3.9
[Galaxy S III Android Development] jothi2lingam:
Why my home screens swiping laggy bit but not with apps menu swiping. It's happening with stock kernel & GalaxSih kernel even though already change different roms
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Chillz88:
I dont find any lag when swiping between home screens... the only lag i find is when i switch my phone on after some time of sleep and when i swipe the first screen, it lags a little.. it lags behind after the first finger swipe , after that swiping is smooth like butter ....

Any chance of adding a lil touch boost like cpu or gpu touch boost@harunjo
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
touchboost is default stock...i was disabled it to save battery juice...this kernel is not performance kernel..so smootness is second priority for me.

but i will enable that touchboost again with 40.beta5 to evaluate how far it will eat our battery live
[Galaxy S III Android Development] 6pudu5:
With 40_beta4_I noticed that just goes in deep sleep

Inviato dal mio GT-I9300 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S III Android Development] sunwee:
hmm i thought System tuner just provides info on the phone. guess i am mistaken.

is it able to save the voltage setting and apply them automatically like setcpu and voltage control?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
i think there is an app that have been prevent your phone go to deep sleep
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
v4.0-beta5

v4.0-beta5 Online

gokhanmoral:

-Fix media scanning problem with new clockworkmod

-add efs-backup script

dorimanx:

- Shut Modem logs after new modem update.

- wakelock backoff suspend mod 10sec -> 5sec

- Re-Enable Touchbooster
[Galaxy S III Android Development] 6pudu5:
Edit: with light UV deep sleep difficoltous, with voltage stock deep sleep normal. RESOLVED. :thumbup:

Inviato dal mio GT-I9300 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S III Android Development] mariosraptor:
Yes you can but i had to do a few tricks first.

After uv you have to make use of settings in the same voltage area.

Go to boot settings- reapply cpu settings, select as init.d.

Now with a root explorer go to system/etc/init.d

Open and select 99pmwcpu and rename to

11pmwcpu. Thats it
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MuertoKo:
Or just select apply on boot so you don't need to change any script :) Works great that way, I love that App, even has logcat reader in!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] mariosraptor:
it was not working for me that way. it was resetting itself to stock values after each boot.;)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] pidz:
V4 BETA5 Locked and loaded :p lol

Final version shall be great, Harunjo, what else are you going to add to final release?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
the final version must be the most stable and battery friendly...so its depend on your beta report
[Galaxy S III Android Development] hieupham:
Flashing for testing before JB release, feedback soon bro ^^
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Milchbeck:
I have one problem with the latest version beta5 I can't not save the voltage control settings in the etc/init. Folder :(

Aktuell:

CheckROM EvoHD™ V5/ GalaXsih v3.9 Stable /ICS New Blue Mod V3.2
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Chillz88:
My download always stops at 61percent..i tried downloading beta 5 a lot of times..stopped at the same mark.. can anyone upload another link maybe..?:/
[Galaxy S III Android Development] kenzolo:
TRY HERE
[Galaxy S III Android Development] pidz:
Harunjo,

Found BETA5 to be more battery intensive. Have undervolted now, as per previous BETA4 values, from observations it may appear to be eating more battery, but requires further investigation, will test until battery depletion and let you know.

So far so good. BETA4 had some issues with application crashes, facebook in particular. So far, better on BETA5.

Will keep you posted. :p

EDIT: undervolt is not stable on BETA5, have had a few reboots, values on BETA4 worked fine. Removed undervolt now and re-testing.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Milchbeck:
Voltage Control give me the log

Aktuell:

CheckROM EvoHD™ V5/ GalaXsih v4.0Beta5 Stable /ICS New Blue Mod V4.1.2
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
maybe below post can help you, it just 1 page before this page

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=30899109&postcount=1105
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
did you try to wipe your cache and dalvik?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MuertoKo:
As said way pages ago, undervolt has come to be not even good on battery due to it changing few (at least for most uses, maybe, and just maybe worth a bit if you are keeping device running at high frequencyes for SO long, as those can be hardly undervolted). If you take a look, your device is killing battery on deep sleep, and you can't touch those voltages (CPU offline) or maybe at 200MHz most of the time, test undervolt vs. no undervolt on proper conditions, wiped, airplane mode, and running same video of 5h for example.

That's a good way to see if you are getting real results of any UV :)

For me and my use it came to be no battery saver at all, so I just prefer not to UV, some engineers set those voltages, let's trust them a bit! (I know, they have a security margin, but shouldn't I keep the same to save me from some reboots some day?).

Just my 2 cents here though :)

Hope you get it working well! For me beta 5 is on it's way to be my favourite (noticed no more drain with touchboost and when switching on appdrawer it's kinda noticeable having it activated, and that's nice :))
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Chillz88:
Have only tested for a few hrs.. no reboots..and the my voltage remains altered even after boot.. using setcpu btw.. i m on checkrom v5
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
http://openmindedbrain.info/09/05/2010/undervolting-in-ubuntu-10-04-lucid-lts/

what are the negative aspects of Undervolting?

Well actually*taking some voltage from the CPU could bring in computational problems, basically when taking too much of it the CPU could start mixing 1's and 0's which can crash the entire system (reset needed) or bring in data loss/corruption.

Not so good eh? So how is that people manage to do it without causing those side effects?

It depends on every CPU. Because it is not possible to create two CPU's 100% alike in the factory, tests are made to ensure all CPU's sold can work with the voltages specified under all circumstances.

The fact is that some of the CPU's can work with voltages many times inferior than others that came from same factory/same box.

The trick is to discover the limits of your CPU and set the voltage just a little above this limit and you are good to go.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Jekle_Ace:
Is anyone else experiencing bad battery life with beta5?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MuertoKo:
That's same I read some time ago :D

So for me it's not worth having any reboot (maybe not as daily driver but when squishing my cpu) for a tiny better battery (even for me it wasn't even appreciable, but ofc every device is a world!)

Some day I will test it again and post here results if you wish :) my hard stress test with same kernel with and w/o UV ;)

Just kinda busy now to spend and afternoon repeating tests but I will :)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] apeiron6:
Yes. Battery life is worse. I'm back on 3.9.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MuertoKo:
Statements like this won't help developing guys.

Please post what tests have you done, how it behaved, more info not just "worst I change", betas are ment for testing guys!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] mariosraptor:
Beta5 + wanam 2.2+ dlh8 modem looks like a winning combination.

Although tomorrow i will update to wanamlite 2.3.

Nice Harunjo, can't wait till final 4.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
i am starting to test v4.0 stable here..

with beta5 i notice it had many kernel wakelocks comparing beta4.

beta4 had almost zero wakelocks there
[Galaxy S III Android Development] mariosraptor:
Yes it has alot of kernrl wakelocks. But it has almost zero drain and is more smooth than beta 4 with the same undervolt.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
dont worry, stable version will have same performance like beta5 but it kernel wakelock will behave like beta4

i will release the stable maybe on sunday
[Galaxy S III Android Development] mariosraptor:
I am not worried. I know you will give 110%.

I just try to give best beta feedback so you know what to fix.

Actually i was wondering how all those wakelocks not affected battery atleast on my side. Thanks againg for your hard work m8.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] hieupham:
Yes the battery could be better, rest no problem for now ^^

Pls release the stable 4.0 , wanam has just released the 2.3 ICS ZSBLH3 based ROM - as JB is "very soon" (by SS representative @ IFA 2012 :D)

Thnx
[Galaxy S III Android Development] pidz:
I found with BETA5, without undervolt, it resulted better in battery. Appears to go to sleep alot faster and for longer periods on standby its awesome.

Will trial the undervolt values again but feel its not needed.

BETA5 stability has been best yet for me along with battery life.

V4 stable on the way....woooo!!! :laugh:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] apeiron6:
I think that beta 5 without touch boost will be quite good battery saver. Thanks for great kernel :)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MuertoKo:
You know that we are all askig ourselves not to ask for a flashable whatever before sunday, right? :P

Hope you manage to get a good release then :D Worth the wait :P

Thanks for great job here harunjo! For me Beta5 is sweeeeeeeeeet as hell, but yep, still too much wakelocks, but who cares if it doesn't affect battery? Oh wait! Even better without them? :P Looks like a real improve!

Maybe last ICS release¿ O.o Hope it! As it would mean we have JB code soon! :D
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
i starting to believe the touchbooster is not eat battery too much..do i need to enable that touchbooster for next version or leave it disabled like v3.9? i need advice here
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ph3nom:
i'm getting wanam 2.3 too.

will flash it later on. and report how beta 5 with wanam 2.3.

i have high power management service in my kernel wakelock. but the battery is good so far. i'm uv -50mv for all.

Not noticing any drain with touchbooster. so i say leave it on.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] hieupham:
I dont care about the touchbooster much but leaving is okay ^^
[Galaxy S III Android Development] mariosraptor:
Leave touchbooster. I do not se any significant or any at all battery drainage by it.

I will also repeat that despite wakelocks no battery drain in beta 5 even with wanamlite 2.3 and again with dlh8 modem still a winner.

Great job Harunjo. Sunday is close enough rven monday for a great release.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MuertoKo:
Agreeing with opinions before mine, touchboost looks good and actually brings some nice improvements on performance (ok, not performance kernel, but having it without any drain? always good!! :D :D).

I should definitely keep it, and yep, Beta 5 just without wakelocks could be posible RC for 4.0 and maybe final ICS release O.o Hope hope hope!

Great job there bro!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] walda:
back@ics and of course@Galaxsih! it feels good to be at home...

jb leaks sux...

+1 for touchbooster :)

... tapat*lked
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Nihil_Morari:
Flashed the kernel (v3.9) yesterday and I have to say it seems very smooth and have good battery life (with light at 75% I have almost 2 hours of screen on and 57% battery left). Greeting to the developer :)

Inviato dal mio GT-I9300 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ph3nom:
Damn i was about to post screens too

Heavy use with playing games.

Wanamlite 2.3

-----------------------
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Nihil_Morari:
I can't see the screenshots with tapatalk :confused:

Inviato dal mio GT-I9300 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
v4.0 Stable

v4.0 is online

Thanks to v4.0 Beta Tester:

- Update kernel from 4.0.41 to 4.0.42

- Re-Enable Touchbooster

- Increase USB charging mAh to 800 so you can charge faster via usb3

- voltage control fix, compatible with most of undervolt application - tested with voltage control and setcpu

-AndreiLux:

-silence the touchscreen debug

-Decreased Mali utilization timeout to 100ms down from 1s which improves reaction time on instant GPU loads (Lock screen is best example).

-gokhanmoral:

-Fix media scanning problem with new clockworkmod

-add efs-backup script

-s3cfb: brightness curve mod

dorimanx:

- Shut Modem logs after new modem update.

- arm: smp: Wrap backtrace IPI with irq_enter/exit

This appears to be something that should also be wrapped. Also,

the backtraces experienced may be a cause and not a symptom -

instead of an RCU stall causing backtraces, backtraces

may be causing an RCU stall - which causes more backtraces

and then the system gets mental.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Dodd

-lib/checksum.c: optimize do_csum a bit

Reduce the number of variables modified by the loop in do_csum() by 1,

which seems like a good idea. On Nios II (a RISC CPU with 3-operand

instruction set) it reduces the loop from 7 to 6 instructions, including

the conditional branch.

Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

-init/main.c: execute lockdep_init as early as possible

This patch removes the lockdep warning[1] on ARM platform.

The warning is caused by printk inside smp_setup_processor_id.

It is safe to do this because lockdep_init doesn't depend on

smp_setup_processor_id, so make printk can be called as early

as possible without lockdep complainment.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com

-backlight: use kstrtoul()

The usage of simple_strtoul() or strict_strtoul() is not preferred. Thus,

kstrtoul should be used.

This patch also fixes checkpatch error as follows:

ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)

Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han

Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

-init:calibrate: lpj

Check if cpu calibration delay is already known. For example,

some processors with multi-core sockets may have all cores

with the same calibration delay.

-aio.c: Asynchronous I/O latency to a solid-state disk greatly increased

Asynchronous I/O latency to a solid-state disk greatly increased

between the 2.6.32 and 3.0 kernels. By removing the plug from

do_io_submit(), we observed a 34% improvement in the I/O latency.

Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp

-ARM: SMP: use a timing out completion for cpu hotplug

Rather than open-coding the jiffy-based wait, and polling for the

secondary CPU to come online, use a completion instead. This

removes the need to poll, instead we will be notified when the

secondary CPU has initialized.

Signed-off-by: Russell King
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ph3nom:
Lol harunjo not even sunday yet.

Dling now and great job.

Harunjo path doesn't exist again.

-----------------------
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Milchbeck:
Can not download :(:confused:

Aktuell:

CheckROM EvoHD™ V5/ GalaXsih v4.0Beta5 Stable /ICS New Blue Mod V4.1.2
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
Lol i said maybe..

hmm no file name different ..i dont have any idea what happen with mirror..

i try to reupload the files again
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Milchbeck:
Thank you man :D

I Donate you my friend.. Your work is fantastic :thumbup:

Aktuell:

CheckROM EvoHD™ V5/ GalaXsih v4.0Beta5 Stable /ICS New Blue Mod V4.1.2
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
Download link should working this time !!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] harunjo:
with all due respect, i still not accepting the donation here my friend

my work also yours..if you donate to me then you should buy all beta tester here beer or lunch LOL