yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] NormB:
Blue 32G Power Problems

Sorry 'bout the typo in my first post. Received the phone 7/6.

Took the phone to the VZ store. Tech there was unable to get the device to power on. Tried all of the usual options (ie. replacing the battery). Had the tech call VZ level 2 which was pretty much a waste of time. Level 2 tech said that I couldn't RMA the device because it was still in pre-order status which was after she said that if the phone was RMA'ed I would end up at the end of the pre-order queue. There was no possible way to get a new phone overnighted to me. Was told that the easiest solution would be to go to a VZ store on Wednesday (launch day) and RMA the phone then.

I mentioned that the Blue phones seem to have problems and asked about changing the color to white on Wednesday. Was told that there would be a restocking fee as the blue and white phones have different sku's. Obviously wasn't too happy, but will fight that battle with VZ on Wednesday.

At the end of the visit, the VZ tech reactivated my old Droid I.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] NormB:
www modaco com /topic/355514-sprint-sgs3-screen-sometimes-wont-turn-on/
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Ansextra:
Ok. I see the link. Not sure how valid it is but at least there's something there...

Thanks!
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] dirtyfingers:
Mine has had problems since I turned the thing on. The screen turns purple with lines through it then it dies and I have to pull the battery to get it back on. Just waiting til it releases in stores to do an exchange.

View attachment 1185711

Edit: Great now the store just called me to say the release was delayed until the 12th.
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] vizzy:
Hey Galaxy Mini People

I have installed Creeds latest rom and i am having a few issues with the following apps:

Facebook

hotmail

whatsapp

go backup

Droidwall

How do i get them to move to the SD card? I have apps 2 SD PRO. But i still cannot move them?

also when i open a2sdgui (sd 2 apps) it says it could not start and then lists 3 reasons.

So any ideas how i can move absolutely everything to the SD card?

Thanks

Vizzy
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] force_close:
Try s2e

sent from the center of the earth
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] vizzy:
It's only available for cm roms
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] dheeraj (dhlalit11):
download move to sd enabler and 90% of the apps will moveable to sdcard even launchers and widgets,

and about sd-ext

first partition your sdcard through cwm (everything will be wiped)

after partitioning download link2sd from play store and move apps to sd-ext with the help of that app
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] force_close:
So creeds is not cm based?

sent from the center of the earth
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] Messi10:
it's stock based
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] sach in:
Move 2 SD enabler works fine all GB roms,try it...
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] shagn:
Use the appmonster pro app or links2sd app they r d best available apps in d market they forcefully place all apps n data into ur sd card.....

tyr it..:laugh:
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] oamo:
try with s2e, link2sd or a2sdgui
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] beni.tyar:
i think s2e work well *maybe:D
[HTC Wildfire S] Veritas1506:
Please can someone help with the link for m1ndh4x8r GB2.3.5-EU ROM 600mhz default kernel as the ROM is unstable on my device without the kernel.

Thank you in advance.
[HTC Wildfire S] hussy22:
Here u go : http://androidforums.com/wildfire-s...ockernel-stable-apps2sd-premium-features.html

Click thanks ;)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] ad86:
Hello,

I have the same problem : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4p0-kv1cxA.

When I unlock the phone, the screen stay black.

I'm on official ics 4.0.4.

I try to repair with pc companion but the problem is still present.

Please help me :crying:
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Someguyfromhell:
Downgrade to Gingerbread with Flashtool.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] ad86:
With GB I have the same problem too.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Someguyfromhell:
Could be hardware issue, take to repair center then if you still have warranty.

Better let them deal with it before something gets really messed up.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] ad86:
Ok thanks I will do that
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] jkassay:
Picked up the AT&T Galaxy SIII. Wanted to see if all the hype was fair.

Compairing it to my HTC one X:

What I don't like.

1. Shiny case is slippery ( more than the oneX) and is a finger print magnet.

2. Home button is a pain (imho) and the back button is on the wrong side (imho).

3. The navigation buttons are back lit. I like the permanent ones on the oneX.

4. The screen looks fine indoors. Outside it washes out terribly.

Neutral:

1."Seat of the pants" performance seems the same.

2. Build quality, no big differences

3. Removable battery and back cover, don't care...

4. Stock UI launchers, Both have the good and bad points.

5. Battery life is about the same.

What I like:

1. Some of the Samsung apps are better, like the Exchange client and sms app

Bottom line:

1. The washed out display outdoors is the deal breaker for me.

2. If you already have the oneX, keep it.

3. It's amazing how all of the Hype surrounding a new device confuses reality and how the buyers defend their purchases even if they don't like them.

4. Haven't found the perfect phone yet, but I like the OneX so far.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] live4nyy:
Thanks for that focused, in-depth review of your

personal opinion

. I'm sure that it will have NO effect on my purchase decisions.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] SolusCado:
I was just about to thank you for the frank and simple, hype-less review. Ignore live4nyy! :)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] G4 Man2:
That's your choice, my personal opinion is i'm not sure i want you on this forum
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] rohan32:
^+1

And hopefully this will stop the "ZOMG GSIII IS SO MUCH BETTAR LOL XD THE HOX SUCKSSS I <3 SAMSUNGG" in the forums.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] jayv81:
I bought a gs3 yesterday. Had it for about 2 hours then returned it. The main thing I didn't like was touchwiz. I much prefer sence. Both stock devices performed the same. But needless to say I'll be using my one x til the next HTC flagship is released.

Sent from my HTC One™ X, an WCX Illuminati 4G LTE smartphone
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] live4nyy:
Lucky for us, we all have that right to ignore one another. I could have easily ignored the thread but I just felt froggish today. :silly:

And the world keeps turning. ;)

Unfortunately, nothing will stop people from stating their egocentric opinions on these forums.

What I don't understand is, I didn't attack the OP, I didn't say anything about how redundant, self-centered, or irrelevant the review was, I just simply pointed out that it was his opinion and it would have no effect on me. But at least now I know how easily manipulated and defensive some of you are.

To each his own. I apologize that my opinion is less important then the next person's.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] sc2tltl:
So salty.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] bloodrain954:
not sure if just stupid or trolling :confused:
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Alcoholic:
I think it just comes down to software being better on the galaxy and build quality being superior on the one x.

Software is better due to true multi-tasking and sense not slowing the phone down.

If we ever get non-sense roms the one x will be perfect and that's why i'm not switching.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] live4nyy:
To be honest, if I were looking at this from the outside I would say it was trolling. I had a point to what I was trying to say but it got lost in the hypocrisy.

Depending on what forum you're in, people are quick to bash anything that slightly resembles criticism of their current phone but when someone wants to praise said device it becomes applauded. Why should we allow an individual's opinions to be quantified into justification that one phone is better than another? I am sort of feeling that people on the Android side are becoming similar to Apple customers, where they blindly attack one another based on their allegiance to a device and/or manufacturer. My message was simple. "Your opinion has no effect on my decisions". Was it necessary for me to say that? Probably not. But was it necessary for the OP to tell anyone they should just "keep" the HOX over the SGS3? Probably not either.

The devil is in the details.

From the OP:

Bottom line:

1. The washed out display outdoors is the deal breaker for me.

2. If you already have the oneX, keep it.

3. It's amazing how all of the Hype surrounding a new device confuses reality and how the buyers defend their purchases even if they don't like them.

4. Haven't found the perfect phone yet, but I like the OneX so far.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Giskarded:
Just got the GS3 after having the One X for the past month.

I'm quite underwhelmed.

The feel of the device is fine in the hand, however, the screen isnt nearly as good in daylight as the One X.

The camera is great in well lit situations, but worse in low light.

The clickable button is not to my liking either. Much prefer the touch buttons on the older samsungs and the one x.

The Power button is in the right place for my hand on the S3. The one X power button is just not ergonomically placed for me.

The GS3 is a fingerprint magnet. Much more so than the One X.

Much prefer the UI of the default One X over the GS3.

Will most likely pay the restocking and get the One X in the next couple of days.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] _MetalHead_:
Oh look, another GS3 thread. Can't have too many of these in the One X forum.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] tx3kgtman:
Least there are still one x owners around to defend there device :)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] _MetalHead_:
Hahahaha awesome
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] jkassay:
wow, Look at all of the negative comments! Wasn't meant to be so controversial.

No this is not another in depth review. There are plenty of them out there. I read most of them and decided to give the S3 a try. This is just my reaction to all of the Hype and advertising. Simple real world use of things that are important to me. Yes it is my opinion, I am not bashing the Samsung phone, just stating some of my real world experiences and how the oneX works better for me. I am not afraid to say that I made a bad $549 decision that didn't improve my smart phone experience.

I was just hoping that my experience would help other owners of the oneX from feeling they bought the wrong smartphone.

I reiterate that I haven't found the perfect smart phone yet and I will not stop trying. I will take back the S3 and keep the oneX for now.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] corythug:
Im still coaxing my SGSIII to mount my One XL to make daddy a Galaxy XL. Any day now...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] tony_5309:
I have both the HOX and SGS3 as well. Both have goods and bads but to me I like both about the same :)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] vioalas:
HAHAHA. Too bad, the One XL is a good girl. She won't just let any phone get access to her battery, it takes some scented candles and soothing music.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Irish Enigma:
Hello all,

I was wondering since we figured out how to flash a kernel with a ROM through the boot loader on the AT&T HOX, if we could decompile and reverse engineer an RUU or ROM/Kernel package to show it's source code. Sorry if this has been thought of or if it's a stupid idea, I am not a developer.

Thanks.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] rohan32:
You can't just reverse engineer a kernel, its in binary format.

You need the source code.

If HTC doesn't release the source soon then we should start working on a kernel based on the One S source.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] NJGSII:
That's what may have to happen

Both phones share the same processor. When I had the AT&T Galaxy S2 we waited for kernel source from the international S2 ICS to drop and devs were able to make do with that. Some thngs had to be changed around (Mics on the phone for instance had to be swapped).
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] MyronJ906:
I think that is the most sensible way to go for now. We have so much progress on all of the AOSP roms that is pretty much halted just because of not having kernel source yet. If the sources are similar enough, wouldn't it be relatively simple to move back to the intended One X source when we get it?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kleeman7:
The reason we have aosp is because it was ported from the one S, we need our own source to fix the remaining bugs.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] MyronJ906:
Haha, I didn't even think about that. But, it is a big blaring DUH. My bad :) Haha in my defense, I'm multitasking
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] NJGSII:
Doh!.

Lets all put the full court press on HTC to get Source released.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] bloodrain954:
if it were only that easy, basically this is how it works, we ask, they say when we want to release it we will. No explanation as to why it hasn't been released or anything
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] MyronJ906:
I think the biggest problem is that they are going to release it. They know they are, and we know they are. The obstacle is that they most likely already know precisely when they plan to, but we do not. We only know a window. If it gets out of that window our pressure might help, but until then I doubt they care.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] enviii:
I don't get it. What's the point of not releasing the source code? If anything, HTC will only benefit by getting more sales after people realize the source code is out meaning that full on AOSP roms can be released.

Im still an Android noob here, is there any disadvantage from releasing the source code?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kleeman7:
Control is the only benefit for them.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] gunnyman:
Keep in mind that AT&T is only one carrier with this device, yes they are the largest, but they're the only one. They would have no control over the release of the Roger's source code either, but it's not out.

I just sent my weekly request
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kleeman7:
I meant HTC having control.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] MyronJ906:
Maybe they're trying to finish up the leaked update and they will release source at the same time. We know at the very least, there is an update coming. It wouldn't make sense to release source for an old version or a version that is not yet completed
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Irish Enigma:
Can't think of any except control.... Unless if AT&T is retired of replacing formerly rooted/rooted phones at their service centers. That and control; greedy bastards...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kiosk77:
Can people use the kernel source to figure out how to get google wallet working? If so, that may be a reason why greedy ____ ATT would not want us to have the source code. Pure greed. after HOX, I'm going back to T-Mobile.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] twistedddx:
The phone is sold around the world. The population of the rest of the world far exceeds that of USA. At&t is just another fish in the ocean.

I doubt at&t has anything to do with the source not being released. It likely comes down to XL is not stable and development on the kernel is ongoing still.

Anyone reading xda would think USA was the only country that has smart phones.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] MyronJ906:
Let me get this straight... Not only are there other countries, but you also expect me to believe that they have smart phones?

Give me a break, sheesh!

Just kidding, you raise a valid point
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kiosk77:
the S4 version is used by ATT and Rogers, but the international version uses a different chipset... so different source. I'll stop guessing why the source code for S4 version is not out yet.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Irish Enigma:
Didn't HTC release source code today?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] twistedddx:
The one xl (s4) is on sale in most major markets. The "international one x" is also on sale in most major markets.

One XL is not at all exclusive to USA or at&t.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] gunnyman:
They released more than 40 sources. Ours wasn't one of them.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kiosk77:
did not know the XL was S4 too, good to know.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kiosk77:
Is the kernel for the One S usable for the One X? aside from the screen size, I don't see much different in the specs for these devices.

EDIT: I guess different wireless connectivity is a big one
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] jags_the1:
We will have the source code soon... At least that's what i hope :D
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] ThePhoneGeek:
AT&T is the holdup for the US version but wouldn't the release of the Rogers version be what's needed? My question/point being that we're likely to see that before the AT&T version if for no other reason than Rogers released the device sooner...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] derekedw:
The one x xl was specifically made for lte support, of which, att is the largest gsm/lte provider in the world. I would bet att still holds the cards on release of source code, something in the contract. The international hox has source released.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] twistedddx:
Based on what numbers? It doesn't appear to be the largest by subscribers or by distance covered.

I think TeliaSonera beats AT&T on both.

And while Vodafone does not have LTE turned on in all(or many) of their regions they do tick the boxes and have a much larger customer base with a much larger network.

Deutsche Telekom and Singtel have a similar story as Vodafone.

And I havent really check much into Russia and China companies but I assume they are bigger also.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] h8rift:
Eh....not true.

Google Wallet has nothing to do with Kernel Source.

We have the permissions for secure NFC in CM9 for Google Wallet (and AOKP). The problem is that Google Wallet apk doesn't work for whatever reason. Technically, we are not SUPPOSED to have Google Wallet on this device. Its not a high priority bug on the bug list right now....but depending on how long kernel source takes, I may end up getting to it quicker.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] h8rift:
Also, guys take this into account.

ATT / Rogers / Telestra didn't sit down and decide to tell HTC to not release source code.

Take this likely scenario into account:

When a device manufacturer decides to release kernel source, they have to ask EVERY part manufacturer's permission to release source.

Since One S and Evo LTE have been released, but One XL has not, it sounds like a specific part manufacturer that is unique to the One XL is actually your hold up. Still, chew down HTC for it since its their responsibility to bring that to the development community, but i would highly suggest not throwing release of kernel source in the carrier's face. They have no pieces IN the code and don't really give a flip if its released.

Just sayin'.

-h8
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] h8rift:
We thought the same thing until we started compiling a X kernel from the S source. Apparently there is ALOT different xD.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kiosk77:
Got a more encouraging response from HTC

... and a follow up
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] gunnyman:
Crock of crap. If it's the source of the released kernel there's nothing to make ready. It already is ready.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] MyronJ906:
Exactly.

Haha, unless they're removing all of the comments referring to how bad of a hack job it is.

#OMG WTF IS THIS? HOW IS THE PHONE SUPPOSED TO MULTITASK?! WE NEED MORE TIME.

#RUSHED CODE. HTC WANTED THIS BY RELEASE DATE.

#I'M SORRY XDA.

etc.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] phishie:
I laughed
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] gunnyman:
The att device isn't supposed to have an unlockable bootloader anyway. I wonder if that's part of the delay.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] vitaminxero:
They also have to make sure they don't give the source to stuff like the camera but to release something that works with features stripped. Then what to replace with binary blobs instead. I suppose it's a lot of work.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] pearlbrian:
That's a solid theory, and maybe the most likely reason yet. However, if true i don't think it bodes well for us.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] gunnyman:
Rogers source will be fine too.

---------- Post added at 05:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:08 PM ----------

Sensation xe just added. Maybe they will add a source we can use today
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] loneBoat:
That's what's always confused me about the asserted reasons for delaying release. You have to "get it ready"? If you're doing anything to "get it ready", then you're changing something, which goes against the requirement to release the source code. If tweaking source code prior to release were permissible, why would anyone release anything other than printf("Hello world"); as their [tweaked] source code? :laugh:
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] gunnyman:
Yeah I'm not buying it.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] rchms6:
Here's my latest response. Seems familiar...

"Your request is clearly understood and we are working hard to make it available.

The One X kernel source code will be released soon.

We want to make certain that it is quality checked and ready for your use before providing it.

The download link will be available on HTCdev.com.

We sincerely hope that you will remain with HTC as a customer.

Btw, this is NOT a canned response, I simply don’t have any more specific information for you however I am doing all that I can to encourage the completion of this request.

Trust me, I want to see it provided as much as you."
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] ECEXCURSION:
Lol, they used "btw" in their response...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] this_is_nick6:
Haha love the response. At least it wasn't the PR robot approach.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Reamer09:
So which member of this forum is this HTC employee? Nobody cares about source release except the people that frequent these forums.

Sent from my HTC One X
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] phishie:
Uh, what?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] fitchpuckman:
so at this point, does it seem like the holdup is more due to ATT, HTC, or something like the fact that this is an LTE device (since the current kernel release by HTC is (i think) only for non-LTE devices around the world? just looking for an opinion from the devs, who possess knowledge and opinions of this stuff far greater than what mine will ever be.

like, i guess what's the deal with this phone remaining locked when the carriers are already throwing out the source for other flaships, like the GS3? seems like there must be something in between out phone's hardware and the carriers that we are missing...