yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] chulme01:
Hi mate

Can you get into recovery mode to flash another rom ? If not follow one of the rooting guilds in the android dev forums. I had loads of trouble rooting my note and getting everything to work. Don't worry I was in your situation and you can get out of it just have a look at all the rooting guides. In the end from what I remember I flashed via PC Odin a stock pre rooted version of ICS think it was the nordic version i then flashed the rom I wanted through recovery CWM

Hope this helps
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] shoey63:
Abyssnote is for GB, thats why u cant boot back into ICS. Suggest PC Odin and flash Stock ROM from here :- http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1424997 (try different ones of WIFI no-good) plus follow rooting instructions contained therein. If tar file, use Odin, if zip, use Abyss (Just reboot straight back into it)

PS: Dont flash or wipe on stock ICS or CF-Root- ICS Kernels.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] M3TALLICA:
Relax man. What is this aggression for?

-----

@op AbyssNote is for Gingerbread.

Use only ICS kernels on ICS not even CM9.

Flash stock ICS rom. Root it then flash SpeedMod or NoteCore kernel using HC K-Tool.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] praetorius:
id suggest he revert back to stock rom and read a lot before doing any stunts with his phone.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] shoey63:
So NoteCore has MMC bug fixed then? I love that kernel! great for custom bootanimations:D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] lee yun khong:
Don't panic. Flash any ics kernel such as franco r6 or speedmod k3-6 by using "PC ODIN", then you will be fine.

Bear in mind, if u use pc odin to flash kernel u will get binary count increase and yellow triangle. But don't worry, you can use "move triangle" to reset the binary count to zero and remove the triangle.

Good luck.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] lee yun khong:
Sorry double post
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Dynablue:
I tried to download TB from the market today and it shows as incompatible with my device. I did search the XDA Noteforum for similar errors and though just about every ROM thread popped up I haven't found a good match with my problem . Anyone else have this or can point me to a fix? I'd like to start flashing a couple ROMS on this phone (have flashed several Captivate ROMs in the past) but I'd like to be able to backup prior to doing so. CWM is installed and a ROM backup has been made already.

I have an ATT Note, Stock Rom, Mashi Root.

Thank you!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Clark Joseph Kent:
If your rooted should not be an issue, mashi root....

try clear cache from gplay app and try again also you can dl from your pc from gplay...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Dynablue:
Thanks! Cleared cache in manage applications and cleared data as well.

The only TB that shows up in phone market is Pro Key which doesn't work without free version. Even clicking on the more from this developer option doesn't show free.

On the PC it shows as incompatible with both my phones (Captivate and Note).

More ideas?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Clark Joseph Kent:
Maybe your not rooted...as you might think you are....? Are your other rooted apps working?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Clark Joseph Kent:
I used this method to root?

When i was on stock...

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1504218
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Dynablue:
Rooted per your link, used Root Checker (mentioned in the last pages of the thread) and I have root access. Still no joy on TB. Hesitate to flash w/o it, ya know. Want to try the Blackstar ROM but don't want to lose everything. Have done SMS and Call log BU, CWM recovery shifted to PC, most data is on External SD but still want to be cautious.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] wyldkard:
We can always upload the apk for you and you can install it that way if other methods fail
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rangercaptain:
@Dynablue:

What country are you in? Some apps are restricted. I had to change my CSC code when I was out of the US so I could use the US market.

See system/csc/ and open the sales_code.dat file and see if the code is ATT.

The only other reason is your dpi settings are not the default.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Dynablue:
Southern Cal but not far enough down to worry about hooking a Mexican tower. Mayhaps I'll need to install that .apk

Appreciate the assistance.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Tx Redneck:
Here's the link for the app developer's website. http://matrixrewriter.com/android/files/TitaniumBackup_latest.apk
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] wyldkard:
Do you know how I can get tmobile apps to show on the note playstore? Specifically TMOs visual voicemail
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rangercaptain:
No. But I can help you with VVM:

http://m.androidzoom.com/android_applications/tools/tmobile-visual-voicemail_nwok.html

For any missing apps you can unzip a stock t-mobile rom and pull out any apk you need.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Dynablue:
Thank you for the link. Wonder why it was being so difficult?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rangercaptain:
Thia suggestion is for both members with the funky market. What I do sometimes is google for the old app then let it auto update.

http://androidadvices.com/download-android-market-version-344-apk-widget-support/

Get the old market apk, install it, and let it upgrade.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rangercaptain:
One more option is an app called Market Fixer:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kstudio.marketfixer
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] escabar:
Have you modified your DPI?? Or are you on stock 320 DPI???
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rangercaptain:
@escabar:

Dead on with the dpi thing, that's the cause of a lot of the incompatibility problems. I can' tell if stock means no dpi adjustments.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, (US Carriers)] tadj:
it was i997ucki3 with androit 4.0.4

i tray to unlock it with z3x but need to root then

Count supported models - 302

Searching Samsung USB Modem... Not Found

Done with Samsung Tool ver 12.2

Starting ADB Server... OK

Checking ROOT... FALSE

Reading Phone Info... OK

Android Version: 4.0.4

Model: SGH-I997

Product Code: SGH-I997ZKARWC

Phone Version: I997UCKI3

IMEI: 35836504030xxxx

Not Supported Android Version: 4.0.4

Done with Samsung Tool ver 12.2

i make an old firmware Stock_Root-Mod3e-UCKD5_Odin.zip witch work with android 2.0.3 the result is very hard , i get my samsung stuck on start logo

please any one can help
[Galaxy S III Q&A, (US Carriers)] M0D1441:
Please read the forum rules before posting here. Please! Do NOT post in the development section for questions, that's why they have a Q&A Section. Post there, and you'll be more successful in life.

Wait? The i997r? What the hell are you doing here? GET BACK OVER HERE
[Galaxy S III Q&A, (US Carriers)] howtomen:
U haz s3 :D
[Motorola Droid 4] podspi:
Ever since I flashed the 213 leak, battery life has been a bit disappointing. To help things along, I downloaded SetCPU (haven't used it since my good ole OG Droid) and let it autodetect settings. To my surprise the governor was set to 'interactive' instead of hotplug like it was on stock GB.

My understanding is that hotplug allows the phone to disable unneeded cores during periods of low utilization, while interactive does not (although both cores can be disabled when the phone is sleeping). Do you think switching to hotplug from interactive will improve battery life?

My battery life is much better since switching, but I also disabled 4G (on WiFi most of the time) and added screen off and low battery profiles (600mhz and 800mhz max respectively) which muddy the waters a bit. I thought I would mention it on here for those of you who feel the same, it might be an easy way to improve battery life on the leak.
[Motorola Droid 4] omniuni:
That's interesting. I've been using the .213 leak and my battery life has been quite good. I haven't noticed any particular drop in battery life, and I keep 4G on all the time. If I don't use my phone much, it's not uncommon for me to have 60% left at the end of the day.
[Motorola Droid 4] podspi:
Do you use anything like SetCPU? I am wondering whether I can confirm that the default governor of the leak does not shut off one of the CPUs when it is idle. If nobody can confirm I'll get around to checking it myself this weekend :laugh:
[Motorola Droid 4] omniuni:
Sorry, I haven't messed with my cpu settings.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EXTREMAborgis:
Please help me
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] baliriot:
:D Hi,

UPDATE: MOBILE ODIN SUPPORT FOR SGT2 7" & 10" NOW OFFICIAL!!! Yeay! :victory::victory::victory:

FYI for those who are not familiar with Mobile Odin may refer details in this thread http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1347899 ;)

"Flashing with Mobile ODIN does NOT increase your custom kernel flash counter or make the yellow warning triangle appear." - Chainfire
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] D'Anklaud:
i just bought a galaxy tab 2 7", but i guess i need to be rooted first befor i test this , right? I'm on firmware UEBLE4 gt-p3113
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] martijn.vanpoorten:
Am testing Mobile Odin v2.45 on my SGT2 10.1 GT-P5110 and already send a message to Chainfire ...
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] baliriot:
yes sir, your device need to be rooted first to use Mobile Odin :)
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] baliriot:
that's great :) ! excited to get all Galaxy Tab 2 devices listed in supported devices :fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] martijn.vanpoorten:
I use the Mobile Odin pro version and it doesn't work yet on the GT-P5110. I send the mobileodin.txt dump file to Chainfire
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] baliriot:
owh bummer :(... but i'm positive the great Chainfire will sort it out :fingers-crossed: ...

works on my P3100 :)
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] martijn.vanpoorten:
Maybe it's an idea to change this topic name to something different because it's not yet working for all the SGT2 devices.
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] baliriot:
appreciate your idea :) , let see if there are couple more P5110 owners report the same problem or statement from chainfire that P5110 not working yet, then i'll edit the topic... ;)
[Galaxy S III Accessories] bmoreboy02:
Ok so i just bought the ballistic maxx case from the at&t store for $50. I walk out to my car to put it on and quickly find out the case is a piece of $h!t. I dont know where to start but ill try. 1st its nothin lime the ballistic HC case i owned for other phones and absolutely loved. All it is is a ballstic sg case with this redicilous removable screen protector. Itd a hard plastic piece that you put on the phone after you slide the rubber gel on the phone. The plastic is hard to put on. I can see eventually scratching the phone trying to do this snd when you do get it on its lose as hell. It sits off the phone so far theres a gap in between it and the screen. When you press it it clicks against phone. The lip on the case is so big you have to curl your thumb to hit home screen. And ballistic has the balls to charge $50 for that piece of crap. This is one of the worst cases i have ever seen. I immediately took it back and got my refund. If you need a rugged case wait for the defender. That case is junk. If you dropped it in water the water would poor right through the cheap screen protector. Also theres no protection for camera. I took a few pics before returning.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] browniegirl:
I was hoping to try the ballistic series too....dang

Sent fromTyra's galaxy siii C:
[Galaxy S III Accessories] Alanmw86:
I checked it out at a AT&T as well and I have to agree...I thought it was garbage.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] bmoreboy02:
I dont understand what it is there trying to do. There HC cases were very good cases. Fit both my evos very good. Ballistics only downfall to me was customer service and they were normally late to the game. This case is just an embarassment to ballisctic. Very cheap not well cut and just dosent go well with the phone
[Galaxy S III Accessories] ReggieTee:
I hate bulky cases on slim phones anyway.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] pringlechip:
I got the case and I don't see why you guys are giving it such a bad rap. I bought it for when I go over to the desert for the extra protection and it should work just fine. I actually liked the look and feel better than other otterbox cases. Personal preference I guess.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] titans1187:
I have the normal Ballistic SG coming from amazon tuesday or wednesday so I'm hoping it winds up being a nice case. if not ill probably check out the trident ageis or casemate tough
[Galaxy S III Accessories] lopezpm:
Thats too bad, it looks pretty cool
[Galaxy S III Accessories] bmoreboy02:
The main thing is that whole removable screen protector. That wws just a dumb idea
[Galaxy S III Accessories] MichaelVash7886:
Not really what I was wanting for $50, guess I'll get the otterbox.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] bmoreboy02:
Heres a video i found

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKm14N17aSk&feature=youtube_gdata_player
[Galaxy S III Accessories] cgardnervt:
I had the same issue! It would bubble up after installing the screen protector. The case is JUNK. That is a fact.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] werked:
No disrespect meant at all....but I completely disagree with the OP. I have this case and have grown to really like it. OP mentioned the screen protector having a gap between it and screen....it does not if installed correctly. Instructions clearly state to place screen protecter on phone BEFORE applying gel case. There is a lip around the screen prot/gel case that locks it into place (which also greatly aids in keeping water out....not saying go drop it in the washer and walk away but you get what I mean). then the polycarb shell fits perfectly....it's all a tight fit and imo looks good. i added pics of mine installed in another thread(can't remember where at the moment). Anyway, I wrote this reply to let people know it's not a bad case....actually had an otterbox defender on my previous phone and it became stretched out and ugly as hell. this case won't do that bc of the outter poly carb shell and how the gel shell is locked on the screen protector. Just saying don't dismiss this case on one or two bad reviews. It's a great case if installed correctly. I even ordered the Ballistic SG in a different color combo to switch things up since i already have the screen protector and holster. I would NOT have ordered a second if it was crap!!

EDIT: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1732976&page=6 Here's the link to the thread w/ pics of the BSGMaxx
[Galaxy S III Accessories] bmoreboy02:
You also said in that thread that your not using the screen protector. I would imagine its bc of the lack of clarity or something else? Why pay $50 for a rugged case if you dont have the built in screen protector? They need to bring back the HC series. And when the defender is released youll see how making a 3 layer rugged case look smooth and fluid isnt that hard
[Galaxy S III Accessories] werked:
You are correct. When I posted that I wasn't using the sp. I liked it then. Now I have it on and like other just the same. Its still very responsive and clear. NO gap between screen and sp at all. I have used an ob defender....smooth and fluid are not words I would use to describe it. I liked it bc I could bounce it off of cement with no ill effects but it was hello ugly imo. To r each his own I guess. Just wanted everyone to see how the sgmaxx preformed when installed correctly.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] bmoreboy02:
In your pictures it dose look like a nice fit. I tryd puttin the screen protector on before putting silicone on and after and it just was hidious. Also watchin the video review on youtube people really didnt have anything good to say. I just like the HC case and tje Defender because it gives you the feeling the phone is sealed tight and well protected. Ballstic sg maxx to me isnt really any different then a seidio rugged combo case. Layer after layer but no real screen protection
[Galaxy S III Accessories] lensgrabber:
Bought a clone from ebay. $5. Hasn't arrived yet. I still think the Kraken will be the one to beat.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] bmoreboy02:
I have a commuter now and i really like this case. I normally hlget defenders but must admit after a while between the dirt that gets under the screen protector and stuff it gets annoying. I have the visor screen protector now and really like the slim case.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] Phoneguy589:
The case isn't horrible but it is (at least for me) difficult to hit the buttons at the bottom of the screen. The removable protector is not a "bad" idea but if they had a better fitting screen protector I think it would be better for us users. Having the option to replace it is nice but you don't have the option to have the screen face out while in the holster. I saw that seidio has the surface case so I might return this case and buy that. I really wish they would make a waterproof otterbox case which might happen because FINALLY Samsung has a device that is the same shape for all the carriers! :)

Usually with the Otterbox cases I pop out the built in protector and put one on the screen directly. I had an iPhone 4 that got chips in the glass because of little particles getting in between the glass and the built in screen protector.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] davidstech11:
I have the same case and I like it. It was not too difficult to put on for me. As for the screen protector, I also have it off and like that it is not like the Otterbox. Why do that on a $50 case? Its the same reason I rip the display cover off the Otterbox Defender series. Because I don't like them. If I ever start scratching my display maybe I will install the removable display cover since it can go on and off. But I get these cases not for the screen protector but for those rare times I drop my device. And for that I am fine with it.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] scitech09:
Well, even after reading the negative reviews on this forum, I decided to get this case, since I have already dropped my S3 (luckily it was in another case). Everyone has different tastes when it comes to cases, but I personally think this is an excellent case. Well built, protective, holster included, and not too bulky. I am very pleased. I don't find it hard to get to the home button or capacitive buttons. The volume rocker and power button are easy to push. The only thing that I would agree with is that the screen protector is not very useful for me, but I like that I don't have to use it. With the Otterbox Defender, I always have to physically remove the screen protector, which ruins the case. One final point. All of the Otterbox Defender cases that I have owned have scratched my devices, including an iPad and iPhone. Clamping down hard plastic onto devices is usually not good. I like that the Ballistic case uses silicone on the device and plastic around the silicone. The only thing that I wished this case had was a kickstand.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] twoashj:
I thought it's gonna be the big competitor of Otterbox stuff. :cyclops:
[Galaxy S III Accessories] Srambo217:
$50 on a case?!
[Galaxy S III Accessories] Xcor3:
-_-i don't see how this is a bad case. The only thing is the price tag

Sent from my SGH-T999
[Galaxy S III Accessories] scitech09:
I agree. Cases in general are too expensive. They really get you with new devices, since there is less competition.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] Haunt3r:
I had this case, ended up taking it back,not worth the $50 I paid, turned around and ordered an incipio dual case(?) for $19.99, so we'll see, I don't normally drop my phone, so I'm not too worried about it, but with a phone this slim, I feel it needs a case.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] gaarry:
I think it's a good case, just got it yesterday. It is true about the button thing, the front lip is pretty big so you have to manuever your thumb creatively to hit the home button. Other than that, the corners look rugged as hell. Oh, and the screen protector that came with mine was defective, hopefully their CS comes through.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] G-Man.:
Ballistic has Confirmed that they are going to produce a Ballistic HC Series case for the GS3 - no offical release date yet. Shoot them an email and see!
[Galaxy S III Accessories] Ted A:
OP FAIL!

You're supposed to put the plastic screen cover BEFORE you put the rubber get on.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] bmoreboy02:
No ballistic failed. I tryd it both ways. The case is a piece of crap hands down
[Galaxy S III Accessories] carhauler1969:
I personally love mine, big improvement over the original Shell Gel series, and less bulky.

I do agree the screen protector sucks, so I'm using it with Zagg Invisible Shield HD.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] bmoreboy02:
The screen protector i think is a bigger deal then people are saying. I mean when you pay that much for a case you should get the works. Tight fit holster and built in screen protector that fits flush. I would respect them more if theyd a just added a holster to the SG and sold it like that instead of charging $50. I will say this i just aquired another ballistic maxx in a trade and this one isnt the at&t branded one its the actual ballistic. The screen protecgor is still horrible but the shell fits better
[Galaxy S III Accessories] scitech09:
Maybe the first one you got was a lemon. I picked up one from AT&T. I never took the screen protector out of the box. I much prefer to use SGP screen protectors. The silicone and hard plastic shell fit perfectly. The silicone is very solid and doesn't really move. The last time I used a Ballistic case was a few years ago. I think the build quality has significantly improved.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] bigdipper:
never use a case. stay natural.

The funniest thing is mobile phone manufacturers are trying to make their phones slimmer, while we buy cases for our phones and trying to make them thicker:p
[Galaxy S III Accessories] bmoreboy02:
If i didnt work in such a rough environment id just get ghost armor but it dosent protrct from drops
[Galaxy S III Accessories] scitech09:
Bigdipper, that is a very funny insight, but definitely true. Back in the pre-smartphone PDA days, the devices were pretty thick and not too nice to look at. I never thought about putting a case on them. Now the devices are so thin, delicate, and expensive that we are afraid to use them.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] bmoreboy02:
The way i look at the big cases is its a way for construction workers like myself to be able to buy nice phones like this and take em to work. I install fire protection systems and it can get pretty rough. But if it wasnt for ballistic and otterbox id never take my phine out of my work truck
[Galaxy S III Accessories] bmoreboy02:
And ill man up and say i might of jumped to conclusions to fast on this case. Me and a friend both bought the at&t branded ballistic cases and they were horrible. I then got my hands on the one that comes directly from ballistic and even this the screen protector is still a joke the case dose however fit ALOT better. I have an otterbox defender on its way tomorrow so now im a have some serious thinking to do. So if you do buy a ballistic look for one in the actual ballistic package like the one in my pics. Heres a few pics of the black on black
[Galaxy S III Accessories] johnnilsson:
I think this case is nice. I have owned many otterboxes. A constant problem I have with the defenders is after taking them off so much the tabs begin to wear and break. I only want max protection when I need it and something more appealing when I don't. This case goes on and off with ease. I use the moshi screen protector with it which is a good combo.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] werked:
I experienced the opposite, my ballistic case that I got from at&t fit like a glove. I also ordered from ballistic, just got today and doesn't fit good at all.... I'll be sending it back. I did read somewhere that ballistic is going to make the HC for the sgs3.

Sent str8 from my half eaten Banilla Ice Cream Samich