[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] LiquidSolstice:
I don't agree with this, but seeing as your tone has changed direction, I don't have any issue with having a civil discussion with you.

Yes, this is a common complaint. Except, here's my take; It's been almost two years since Sprint's first "4G" device came out. In that time, I have not experienced a single ounce of WiMax on my Evo 3D. What is the point of having it if there's no coverage? Even now. I have an LTE phone but where is my LTE? Oh, that's right, it's not coming for a very long time. :( Maybe Apple deserves to be dinged for not adding it in, but part of me wonders whether or not it was a strategic decision to not launch a 4G device without there actually being a 4G infrastructure.

The Rezound is one phone. The iPhone 4 and 4S have both had higher PPIs for quite some time, and no phone since has matched it. Our phones don't even hit the same PPI, but the key point here is that after 300, PPI does not matter as the human eye cannot distinguish pixels past that point.

And here's the biggest point you've forgotten. The iPhone 4 was announced June 7, 2010. The Rezound was not announced till November of that same year. So who was playing catchup again?

This is no more an advantage or a disadvantage than having two cars and one of them being red or one of them being blue. Screen size is personal preference. I don't believe bigger is always better. I happen to know of many people who find the 4.3" phones of today to be far too large.

Because Eclair had an advanced Siri competitor? A solid 60 FPS framerate throughout the entire OS? A proper set of "Do-Not-Disturb" tools that didn't require third-party hacks? A full blown 3-dimensional live-image flyover of cities within the Maps application? Complete lockscreen notification integration? Come on man, get real, this is too broad.

I only half agree with this. Having jailbroken a few Touches for people, I'm actually quite surprised with what Cydia packs. That being said, an unrooted Android is indeed more customizable.

....what!? Unlock what? The phone itself? You can easily unlock an iPhone to use on other carriers, and there has been an untethered jailbreak for every single iOS version that has ever come out.

Android's "freedom to unlock"? Excuse me? Yes, you have "freedom" if you're on AT&T and they lock down the ability to sideload applications. You have "freedom" if you're an HTC Sense 4 user and suddenly, you don't get the option to pick how you want to open up a phone number that you tap on?

You have the freedom to let carriers decide whether or not your barely-new phone gets updated to the latest operating system. You have the freedom to watch your phone lose its support completely.

No, my friend. THIS list is the one that goes on and on. You can't say "well you can root and flash a new ROM", because you have to wait for someone to find a root exploit and have someone fix the problem and push it to a new ROM or a flashable zip, which means you're not depending on your phone company or Google to fix your issue, you're depending on other people, in the EXACT same way that iOS developers find exploits to jailbreak and install Cydia to fix issues they have. Just as you can flash newer versions of OSes on your phone, they can do the exact same thing.