yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] beestee:
Plus one.

Just updated to K3-6 myself. Ive used franco kernel before but found it too 'bleeding edge' for my tastes.

Speedmod ICS kernel is what you are looking for, safe stable and full tw support. Just be sure to do your full-wipe from within in GB beforehand to reduce the possibility of issues.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] numbnutsuk:
+2

Not sent from an i phone....cos im not a fanny
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] iyousif:
Being SpeedMod user since Samsung Galaxy S 1, 2 and up to Not's K3-6. The best around for safety and stability and battery life.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] cheesemp:
Stuck speedmod on my note just over a day ago to make it 'safe' and I've been really impressed. If you want ICS (and can risk superbrick) on the note I'd recommended it. Its even improved my battery life...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] meethere:
ok

i have rooted ics stock rom

what is the best way to install speedmod?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] anonymous572:
Just flash ICS ROM with PC Odin. It's 100% safe...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tonyking:
guys one information which i want to share with you

yesterday i put mail to CEO of samsung mobile and told every thing related to faulty ics firmware, kernel prob, emmc-brickbug prob and all information about the user who had bricked their device

today i got call from SSC the person to whom i was taking told me that there is nothing to worry about ics firmware and kernel does not contain any fault like this both sgs2 and note are highly up gradable set and to upgrade note you should have speed of 3.0 mbps if you upgrade it through kies or upgrade it from service center and if there is any prob found after update samsung technician are ready to help us

one thing more as everyone know that ics has more battery drain prob and gb does not so there is nothing to worry about and rooting the device is third party software and samsung does not provide any help if you root your device and got it bricked so be care full and enjoy upgrading :)

btw- upgrading is at your own risk if you do it manually
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] shinzi:
i think so~

i am using 4.04~ but when i use "GotBrickbug-v1.1.apk"

it's also

View attachment 1180732

View attachment 1180733
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lee yun khong:
If u have rooted stock rom, you can install speedmod kernel by using mobile odin.
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BigBang79:
Hi

im search this Boot Animation ?[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rF4UGPHTNS4[/YOUTUBE]. I've already looked at the themes and apps, but not found.......
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] popthosegaskets:
The boot animation is from Cyanogen Mod, according to that video.
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BigBang79:
Hav mi the link for this site pls!
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xtacy!:
Sure, it's www.youtube.com

LOL!

Swyped from my SE Xperia arc (LT15i) using Tapatalk 2
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BigBang79:
so i hav this Bootanimation....... :)

Thanks for your help and this is a nice animation!!! great Jop
[Droid 2 General] bobkameron:
Has anyone figured out how to unbrick the droid 2 after that spring ota update from verizon?

I bought a few droid 2's online for almost nothing, attempting to revive them. But one was stuck in bootloop (couldn't see system properties before it rebooted) and wouldn't recover after a hard reset. I tried downgrading to 2.3.20 sbf (oops) which made me go to bootloader every time I started up. From then, I presumed that it received the new ota update already.... I tried using the new sbf's, but I still get error messages when powering up, which directs to bootloader after seeing the red m logo. The latest sbf released in may yields this:

Bootloader

D2.35

Err:A5,69,35,00,27

Battery OK

OK to Program

Transfer Mode:

USB

Maybe there is an ezsbf iso for the latest sbf? Anyways, I couldn't find it. I also tried to look for a valid bootloader sbf, but also to no avail...
[Droid 2 General] Albinoman:
Do you not know there is a search function? Look around.
[Droid 2 General] bobkameron:
It seems like a lot of other people are dealing with bricked droid 2's so far, no real fix yet unfortunately....
[Droid 2 General] Albinoman:
I'm 90% sure you can flash the 2.3.4 sbf
[Droid 2 General] supergear:
This will unbrick it http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1662091

enjoy. Also no root for 621 so enjoy stock
[Droid 2 General] bobkameron:
Still a no go unfortunately. I've been trying everything lately. I'm beginning to suspect some innate hardware fault as the cause of the bricked phone...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] lanwarrior:
www.androidauthority.com/rogers-telus-galaxy-note-ics-update-canada-99346/

Where's mine AT&T?!

From the Moderator --post ICS related information in the ICS thread
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Sarius24:
What about Bell. Ugh.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ManelScout4Life:
4.0.1? lulz
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] crutzulee:
Would love to hear a similiar announcement from Bell...I gave my galaxy s to my son when I got the note...Darky rom ICS was just released 2 days ago lol...He's been laughing at me since..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] cb2000a:
At this point I would be willing to wait a bit longer and get JB...after all they have had two months already with JB development platform.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] V8RWD:
That a bit longer would be like another whole year.

Or more.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] chriskwarren:
In that case just as well wait for KLP (Key Lime Pie)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] lanwarrior:
I don't think we'll get JB in just 2 months. The carrier must have been working on ICS for sometime, they won't just dump it and move to JB.

I really want ICS!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] seff5677:
i hate samsung !
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] johnnywhojr:
so, while on vacation in Ontario for the last week. I have managed to pop into a few different stores in Toronto and Ottawa and both cities tell me that the reason its late on the Note is due to Bell Mobile TV and a compatibility issue. not sure why it seems to work on other bell ics devices, but that seemed to be the standard answer from all stores I visited. And yes I travelled to more than 2 stores in each town. I would have to say that I visited at least 10 total between both cities. looking for specific accessories and such.

just a FYI for those waiting for Bell.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jayRokk:
The article says "Has just received a tip.."

From who???

Santa Claus??

Thread is pointless has information we already know (just rumors and "he said, she said info) clutters the forums and should be closed
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] mangiant:
Don't be so sure. There was a Telus pdf that was found containing dates and current "status". The Note date was July, but hadn't even reached the "in telus labs" status that the S2X had etc. So it seems like it only takes a month or so for the carrier to validate.
[Galaxy S III General] chemita:
Is this normal after having taken time??? the phone is not 15 days
[Galaxy S III General] henrybravo:
Your fault. You bent the battery cover too much when taking it off.
[Galaxy S III General] chemita:
but the materials were not polycarbonate???
[Galaxy S III General] anarki919:
A lot of people have the same or hardest problem on this thread http://www.htcmania.com/showthread.php?t=405612&page=10

Bent a cover to much is the easy way to break but, a lot people?
[Galaxy S III General] Gembol:
Many people have complained that the cap is broken or scratched with a glance.

Samsung has answered that them have broken it by misuse, but I do not think many people misused the cover.

Manufacturing defect? I think so...
[Galaxy S III General] klander:
Have left many defective and no fault of the user.

The complaint we have begun in Spain, but this affects thousands of users.

Whoever wants to look the other way is your problem, the SIII to cost € 600 and is not acceptable by any means.
[Galaxy S III General] chemita:
There are several places where this news

http://www.xatakandroid.com/moviles...o-tambien-tiene-problemas-con-su-tapa-trasera

http://andro4all.com/2012/07/problemas-tapa-blanca-samsung-galaxy-s-iii
[Galaxy S III General] shootertwist14:
well if you sell millions of these phones i guess there are bound to be some to have their top bent like that... personally mine's still pristine, been using my phone for a month now
[Galaxy S III General] henrybravo:
OK I understand now. I've taken mine off 3 or 4 times with no issues, so I just figured the OP had been a little rough on the battery cover.

Edit: also, I didn't realize the OP was just copying pics from a web site.
[Galaxy S III General] anarki919:
Manufacturing defect and bad materials
[Galaxy S III General] vasp3690:
I disagree.

The material used is allowing some flexibility but it's very thin to allow for little weight and thickness of the overall phone. Even if it was made by carbon OF titanium and it was that thin it could brake. Its not unbrakeable. I have taken the cover off and on lots of times and I always take it slow and careful. What's the point of overreacting? You are holding 600€ of delicate electronic equipment covered in thin covers. You think just because you paid that amount it should also be unbrakeable?

I have had my share of confrontation with htc for their one S but that is because they claimed its so durable that doesn't need a case, though it chipped in a week without any misuse. But this claim to samsung's rear cover I think its pushing it.

Just get a new rear case and be careful how you handle the phone. Its not a hand tool but delicate equipment.

sent with WSGS3
[Galaxy S III General] Tomatoes8:
I still have no idea how people break the Samsung battery covers and the SGP Neo Hybrid frames. As shown in the YouTube videos, you can literally bend the crap out of them. People must be extremely rough with theirs.
[Galaxy S III General] Tinderbox (UK):
did you guys ever see the video of the S2 back cover being bent in two and it was fine, looks like it does not apply to the S3

John.
[Galaxy S III General] vimto25:
Mine has lots of dinks in it all around the side I'm not happy at all of course somehow have applied pressure to course this but I'm aware that I handle my phone very carefully so I think the battery door is very very poor quality
[Galaxy S III General] klander:
We all try to carefully S3, but we must recognize that the quality of the finishes are terrible.

Youtube videos are very nice and the lid bends easily, try to cover your S3 and comets that we ido this to you and if possible record, you'll take a big disappointment.

The S2 was a great phone, both in quality and performance, the S3 is very good interpretations but not the quality of their materials.

regards
[Galaxy S III General] chemita:
this also??
[Galaxy S III General] Sango2:
My solution.

I took out my original battery cover and put this one in its place along with the bumper. Mine did not break, I just wanted a better looking cover some form of protection.
[Galaxy S III General] klander:
That is not the solution, the solution is to give the samsung.

I do not like to take my S3 as Robocop
[Galaxy S III General] vasp3690:
No, apparently not all are carefully with their phones. If you regard the you tube videos of presentstion of the phone as how much you CAN bend the cover, then you are wrong. The people testing the phones are there to sometimes show you the limits of the phone's capabilities or reach them, not to show how you can use it everyday.

The first time you hold the phone you understand that the rear cover is very thin and the clips are delicate. That should increase your attention on how you open and close the cover. Quality is fine ifyou ask me, as I consider quality the fact that the case doesn't squeek and the cover fits well the rest of the phone. I feel you have to go into a lot of effort to crack a clip.

Sorry, that's how I see it.

sent with WSGS3
[Galaxy S III General] Sango2:
I know. That is a brushed aluminum battery cover.

Robocop, I like that ha ha, good name! Actually it was a friend who suggested me to go with that. My original choice was to get a case-mate tough case which I did with my Galaxy Nexus but then it appeared to make the phone too bulky even thou it did have good protection so I wanted to something slimmer without adding much bulkiness and have some form of protection.
[Galaxy S III General] klander:
Work on samsung?

I have had many Android phones, and none disappointed me to much as this.

Up the HTC Magic had better finishes, I like Samsung but not defend at all costs.

---------- Post added at 11:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:56 PM ----------

Another case more....

:rolleyes:
[Galaxy S III General] chemita:
Samsung is aware of a problem but they do nothing. They say it's misuse. And it is not. I paid 638 euros for a phone for two times to remove the cap is broken?
[Galaxy S III General] Tinderbox (UK):
How is your cell and wifi signal with all that metal
[Galaxy S III General] vasp3690:
Stop being thick and look at the bigger picture. At least allow people to voice a different opinion.

Look at htc one s micro arc oxidation finish and then talk about their claimed excellence. Samsung makes it plastic, you need to be careful. Simple.

sent with WSGS3
[Galaxy S III General] chemita:
if now have to catch it with tweezers!!
[Galaxy S III General] vasp3690:
I payed the same and I have opened and closed the cover a lot more times. Either you did something wrong, or you had a duff cover. Posting the same photos on various blogs and forums wont make it more common. Just replace the cover with a new one easily found on ebay, do a video it how you open the cover and let people judge how you handle the phone.

sent with WSGS3
[Galaxy S III General] klander:
Do not understand why you argue the obvious ...

Accusing the end-user mishandling seems to me totally inconsistent. Samsung not done well at this time and must take its decisions if it is actually considered a big company.
[Galaxy S III General] chemita:
we are not questioning how to open it. otherwise the quality of the materials. Sold on ebay. Of course they are sold. But again, it is manufacturing defect. Not that all go wrong. but if a few thousand. To be replaced. And now this. probably costs them 50 cents. that prefierer? that. Or lose customers for poor service technician??
[Galaxy S III General] vasp3690:
I am questioning the obvious because the fact that this hasn't happened in many other users as there aren't a lot to agree or had similar problems proves that this is either a misuse or an incidental event. If this was widespread it would have appeared sooner and this thread would have been more popular.

Edit: to add, if this is a manufacturing problem, why are we not all having issues esp. Those that open and code the cover much more often? I have seen 2 other white s3 so far, from friends and the covers had no issues with their handling. But when clicking it open I am always gentle. Hence why I question the method of use as a possible culprit

sent with WSGS3
[Galaxy S III General] chemita:
So I put it here. As if someone else has happened, and learn samsung
[Galaxy S III General] KMino:
A manufacturing defect, that quality control didn't pick up on or end user error.

Not a bad result considering the number of phones released.

These ain't hand made, so bound to be a few faults not noticed by a visual inspection after it rolls off the robotic manufacturing line.

So it wasn't fixed/replaced under warranty? It should have been.. Guess we are lucky in Australia with our consumer protection laws. Of it was, what is there to worry about :D
[Galaxy S III General] chemita:
That's the problem in Spain. That samsung say NO comes under warranty. For we have given a bad use. But it is clear that it is manufacturing defect
[Galaxy S III General] Michael_P:
I always feel I need to say a prayer or something everytime I remove the cover because I really don't have the most delicate of touches so I do it very slowly one clip at a time starting at the top then on each side, and I just know from the feel of it it's gonna crack or wrinkle or something one day.
[Galaxy S III General] Sango2:
Good question. I was wondering about that too but I did not notice a difference in signal bars with it either on or off in the same location when I was trying it out with all original before I put it on.
[Galaxy S III General] BobFL:
OP, sorry to hear that. However, the back-plate is flexible for a reason. Btw, during pretty much final pre-flight testing of the Dreamliner 787, the wings SNAPPED so it does happen at the much higher and more serious level :)
[Galaxy S III General] klander:
are already being too many cases for Samsung to deign to solve the problem
[Galaxy S III General] muhamet:
You haw 2pictures whit this fault in 30forums.This is nhot general fault.
[Galaxy S III General] klander:
For you it is a general failure?

Have you ever taken the back cover? One to put the sim?

Do not understand why you post nonsense ....: Eek:
[Galaxy S III General] vasp3690:
Posting 2 similar pictures of the same problem of one individual makes it general?? Surely you are not working in a statistical analysis firm I hope...

sent with WSGS3
[Galaxy S III General] klander:
No, I'm a Spanish developer. You if it seems to work for Samsung, this lurking here to see a bad review for Samsung to do the devil's advocate.

Relax and enjoy, if you have any problems with Samsung I'm glad, but let others freely express ourselves and show defects S3.
[Galaxy S III General] chemita:
No quieren ver la realidad de la mala calidad de los materiales. Es una lástima.
[Galaxy S III General] vasp3690:
And you if you cannot handle critisicm best try and develop that skill before posting...

sent with WSGS3
[Galaxy S III General] vasp3690:
Πο;ια πο;ιότητα υ;λικών ρε;. Τα υ;λικά ε;ίναι μια χαρά. Παρε; ένα καινο;ύριο; κάλυ;μμα και ασε; τα πο;λλά λόγια.

Or just post in the Spanish forums if you are going to speak in your own language ;)

sent with WSGS3
[Galaxy S III General] Tomatoes8:
Samsung should learn from this. There are people that think any type of physical damage is somehow related to the plastic build or thin flexible cover. They should just give in and just make the cover thick and rigid and actually easier to break so people stop complaining. And maybe use aluminum for their bodies.

I prefer the plastic for heat distribution, lightness, drop durability but if Apple did the market calculations and discovered that consumers will most likely ignore the advantages of plastics based on a perceive cheapness and welcome glass, steel, and aluminum despite the poor heat dissipation and poor durability, then Samsung should just do it.

I am willing to take a inferior product so these HTC and Apple fanboys will shut up about the build of Samsung phones.
[Galaxy S III General] klander:
The first thing to do is learn to have manners and education.

You are not the god of truth, you're a single user and would be nice to offend you left without reasons.

This is not the place to be brave, for that you private messages.

Respect, above all, respect.

Why not you post your forums in your country and leave people alone?

You need to prominence?

: Cool:
[Galaxy S III General] lude219:
I hope you didn't rip out the back cover like a neanderthal. Just gently pry around one of the sides and the rest should unhinge easily.
[Galaxy S III General] vasp3690:
Haha you really are now becoming quite hilarious. Your friend posted in spanish first and you are telling me about posting in my own language when I tried to prove a point.

Noone is trying to be brave or God. If that is what you see from my writting, then its your wrong impression.

Forums and threads are made to exchange ideas and views. If you wanted to post something just to prove a point and people to agree with you, better have enough evidence to back it up. You guys are showing one cover that broke without the rest of us knowing the was it was handled. Even in my good faith believe that it was handled with care you expect all who read the thread to believe that this is a poor samsung quality as a whole? If that is the case, where are the other people that have the same problem to back up your story?

I haven't seen many people agreeing with you guys in the thread, hence the opposite critisicm which of course you cannot handle. In fact you are becoming personal as if this is a contest of who has the bigger.... ego.

My suggestion to you is to just settle down. If you seek respect, best earn it. My manners have been nothing but good, and perhaps a bit sarcastic as I cannot stand when people say things that are unable to backup and then expect others to just to agree with you and

say 'yes yes friend you are right samsung sucks. Poor quality'

If that is your biggest problem at the end of the day, then yes. Its poor quality. Send it back and get a proper phone made with materials you deem acceptable for your taste.

There you win :p

sent with WSGS3
[Galaxy S III General] chemita:
@Klander Passing partner. It is clear that one comes to say a problem and take you for a fool. As we are taking Samsung. As if the only cover we've changed in life .... Let them
[Galaxy S III General] klander:
Samsung took many years and certainly this is the phone with lower quality materials.

If you do not want to see I think is great. I do not come here looking for prominence, I do not need. And do not need your Samsung Fanboy arrogance, because we may speak of the thousands of screens S2 defective.

If you do not like read reviews of Samsung, do not enter the thread, is that simple.

For everything else ..... MASTERCARD :cool:
[Galaxy S III General] chemita:
Read please

http://www.xatakandroid.com/moviles...-en-las-carcasas-del-galaxy-siii-marble-white

Yesterday we echoed in Android Engadget complaints from several Spanish users who had problems with the back cover of their brand new White Marble Galaxy SIII. Apparently had suffered microroturas terminals on the battery cover, without the normal use of the device would have justified such problems. Today we have good news for them, and which, we communicated the brand itself, Samsung has been to work with the case.

We know that no device usually get rid of small problems when going to market, some type of software, other hardware, but the best to be quiet all buyers is that the manufacturer know shows signs of overcoming such problems.

At first, it seems that the service had refused to repair under warranty terminals such failures on the back cover, claiming it was due to misuse and not a manufacturing defect. However, seeing that cases grow, Samsung will investigate the issue to see whether or not a manufacturing fault to be responding.

Good news for the affected users, although they will have to wait for the manufacturer to give an official response, are the first step by Samsung to bring solution to a minimum but annoying problem in the terminal star.
[Galaxy S III General] klander:
Samsung is investigating the problem in the covers of White Marble Galaxy SIII

http://www.xatakandroid.com/moviles-android/samsung-esta-investigando-el-problema-en-las-carcasas-del-galaxy-siii-marble-white
[Galaxy S III General] chemita:
zasssssssss in every mouth