yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ronfsp:
Can u guys give more helpful feedbacks rather than showing those Antutu & Quadrant results? Everywhere i'm seeing " I have XXX Antutu score! WOW!" " I have XXXX Quadrant scores! OMG!"... So if those benchmarks r high wat does it mean? Ya maybe u can play more complex games dat require high fps or 3d rendering. A smartphone is more than juz playing games or trying to get high benchmarks results to show wat a phone can do... U guys are too obsessed with those benchmark results IMHO... Can post a picture of Antutu results dat covers a quarter of the page... Waste of bandwith... Geezzz....

Like one of the bro says.. A phone should operates smoothly with less errors, good batt life, good internet speed, why worry abt benchmarks scores... I believe Actual improvements of phone's functionality for daily usage is more important. It'll be sad if 1 day u'll be cursing & swearing when u r showing off to ur friends ur Note can achieve Antutu results of 10000 with XX kernel, XX ROM with XX Baseband mod, but when trying to check mail u can't even connect to ur mailbox as ur 3G speed is so slow till the page loads forever! That's SAD! Haha!

Go over to Speedmod thread & have a look! I've been reading 4 pages & not even 1 page have ppl showing Antutu scores or watever benchmarks scores! All posted comments r comments of the kernel's impact on the phones performances, improvements, problems, faults etc...Comments to help the dev to make a better working kernel, not a kernel to achieve high benchmarks scores!

High benchmarks scores wins the battle! Performance with matching good batt life wins the war!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] milsabords:
They are .tar files, not .rar. They must be flashed with PC Odin or Mobile Odin.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] SealsNavie:
No...they are .rar files, please check link below. Okay...which box do I put the .tar file in when I use PC-Odin?

---------- Post added at 04:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:25 PM ----------

I've tried to select my kernel and its not even recognisable in PC-Odin, its currently a .rar file, how do I change it into a .tar file? I don't think I had this much of a problem before when flashing a kernel :D

---------- Post added at 04:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:34 PM ----------

Okay, lets get this straight...someone must know how to install this...

I downloaded V11 from here http://hecubus.com/filelist.php?dir=xda/ksource

You can see its a .rar file, right? So, how do I install it?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] birdfish:
Put it in PDA.

You may need the 'triangle away' to remove the yellow triangle after flash.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] SealsNavie:
I don't have a .tar file, just a .rar file.

Seriously lol...dudes, I have a .RAR file.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] monomer888:
The files in that link i.e. rar compressed files are the source code files. You can't use those unless you compile them first. Let people know which version of the version 11 kernel you're after, and maybe someone can help you.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] SealsNavie:
In that case please point me to a .tar link for V11

---------- Post added at 04:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:45 PM ----------

Ummm...I never knew, not to sound rude but there is no other links that I could have used, sorry.

I'm after V11 Overclocked / Undervolted KERNEL - NATIVE OVERCLOCKING TO 1600mhz

Not V11.1.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] milsabords:
The .rar files contain the source code of the kernel. They are not installable.

The install files are in the first post of this thread, .tar files for Odin, .zip files for CWM.

Put the path of the .tar file in the PDA slot of Odin. After flashing you'll get the yellow triangle, which can be removed with the TriangleAway app from Play Store, so it's better to use Mobile Odin or CWM.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] monomer888:
Luckily, this link still works for version 11 (i.e. not 11.1 which is the latest):

Overclocked version: http://hecubus.com/xda/kernel/GL_NOTECORE_v11_OC.tar

The kernel updates so quickly, so you have to be fast on this thread!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] SealsNavie:
Thank you, that was helpful of you.

---------- Post added at 04:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:54 PM ----------

I have flashed, that download was small, the other wrong download took 45 minutes.

Now I need a link to remove the yellow trianlge, I have a JIG and never used it before...whats the reason for removing the yellow triangle?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] milsabords:
Get this app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/...leaway&feature=nav_result#?t=W251bGwsMSwyLDNd

You will not get Sammy's warranty service if you bring a phone with the triangle.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] SealsNavie:
Btw...I have lost root.

---------- Post added at 05:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:12 PM ----------

I run Triangle Away and it comes up with an error 'Could not locate hidden partition'
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] androiadicted:
4.0.4 dies not support that app. You can ask if this kernel can suport it in the future.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] SealsNavie:
I've got a rooted GB rom so i'll flash that instead, nevermind.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] shaolin95:
Yeah because reading of people whining about battery life on every page is a lot more fun! :rolleyes:

Yeah, countless of iamges of Antutu or Quadrant mean little if no real life performance is tested but it is what it is...people are happy with the new results so be it. ;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] MikeFRG:
Gavin pls bring fast USB charge back!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] betoNL:
Nevertheless, saving Forum bandwidth, by avoiding posting those useless benchmark results, it's not a bad idea.

.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] shaolin95:
This is the problem Gavin has...you asked for this. Then he adds it ...then someone says take it back cause my phone gets too hot...and is a never ending story. :p
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] lilien98:
The question is if you are looking for a kernel which brings you the highest performance possible, the best battery life possible or something between. While speedmod brings you the best battery life, notecore gives you better performance. Of course benchmarks are not everything, but "xy hours battery life with normal use" says nothing about the kernel as well, as it differs from user to user. If you going for a kernel with good performance and excellent battery life install Speedmod, if you looking for excellent performance and good battery life, use Notecore. That´s it. Different users, different requests, different options, different kernels. Of course people going for performance will compare their benchmarks while those prefering better battery life never care about. Otherwise you will find more posts about the excellent battery life in Speedmod´s thread than here. That´s the way of life...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] shaolin95:
Excellent comment amigo. Is like, we can pretty much argue that 90% of the posts are useless then :laugh:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] dingolino:
I would support this, because I am using my Note as GPS Navigation in rental cars while I am traveling.

GPS and Navigation is realy a battery drainer and therefore I am happy if charging AND using is working.

But I thought that charging speed was faster in the couple of last kernels?

Best regards,

dingolino
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Formhault:
WHAT?! IT'S BEEN REMOVED?!

So my phone will no longer draw 1A from the laptop...?

Gavin, heat doesn't matter. Just add it back -.-

Sent from my GT-N7000
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] milsabords:
+1 ! Or make it a config parameter.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] MikeFRG:
Yep fast USB charge is gone i think so in 11.1, before it was amazing fast :crying:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Formhault:
This is my battery report for the day :) .

2 other apps didn't have room in the screenshot : ICS Browser+ 2% and Phone Idle 2%.

I'd say this is pretty good, eh?

Oh yeah, I used the GPS + 3G for a few minutes. Second part of the day : 2G idle only since that's all I have here -.-

-----

Flashed v11.1 at around 2 AM. Phone finished charging (untill 100%) at 8:30 AM or so. Since then, until now... see for yourself.

I think the kernel had enough time to settle in. Gotta sleep, gotta recharge. Extended benchmarking coming next evening ;)

Sent from my GT-N7000
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] cal75:
Just to share, wondering it's my phone problem or battery damage.

I'm on RR V8 + NoteCore v11.1 STD Grp B voltage. Battery drain whenever I turn on my screen, 1% for every 2mins of usage (Facebook, XDA, WWW), wifi ON,BT OFF, GPS OFF. Normal?

My screen brightness set to around 20-30% only.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] betoNL:
That's not what he meant and what .I meant some pages before

Antutu and quadrant are just not reliable enough to measure performance.

That's not how you measure peformance

Not to mention some kernels will apply I/O tunning that will give better benchmark results but trading off data integrity , will cause overheating and other annoyances, but that's another story.

It was just a suggestion on how to optimize thread space.

For example, many users know that overclocking is potentially harmful for their devices, but they want to "fry" their phones anyway just for fun

Others know that most benchmarking is useless, but they keep on running them just for fun

But bragging about how high or complaining about how low the scores are is useless cause in 99% of the cases those results are just not reliable..

But if that's the direction this thread is taking, cause most of the users want it like that, so ..... have a ball .....

Edit: By the way, over here, Both Speedmod and NoteCore (standard) kernels have great performance and great battery life....

.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] JuninhoCelular:
I tried to search 5 pages back but didn't find anything about call record FC.. It's happening to my kingdroid 7.1 rom ans notecore v10.6 UNi its all perfect.. It's been removed? Thanks for reading!!

Edited.. At 11.2 I got the same issue..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] hotelier1984:
Batteries are cheap. A momax battery for Galaxy note with 2000 mah only costs $20. Show me how you can buy performance for $20. Of course you can't, performance is priceless while batteries are cheap.

Plus, i dont experience battery drain problems as others do. Even if this kernel drains batteries like hell, buy a few more batteries for replacement, what's the big deal?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] lilien98:
Why? Of course benchmark says nothing about smoothness or an overall performance. But if I have stable kernel running on my device, of course I can compare these benchmarks. Not with other phones but with my own one. If it makes sense to post them in a forum is another question. It is meaningless like "my battery has 35% left after 20 hours of use." But, as I said before, you won´t stop people telling these things. And of course those going to performance are happy with their benchmarks while others dont´t care. That´s (still) the way of life...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ronfsp:
Exactly bro! Feedback should be given to further improve the kernel or to point out certain "fault" in certain areas dat needs to improve on. We ARE "users" as well as "testers"... I'm taking Speedmod's tread as an example as people there r giving comments on problems faced in day to day usage & not trying every possible ways to get high benchmarks. Does high benchmarks helps the phone in day to day usage of the phone? e.g. high benchmarks equates to faster net surfing speed? Or better signal? Better battery life?

Which will attract more people to dowload certain kernel?

" NoteCore Version XXX "OMFG" Edition - Very Fast, High Benchmark Scores! "

OR

" NoteCore Version XXX "OMFG" Edition - Very Fast, Very Good Battery Life"

I believe everybody heard of the The Tortoise & The Hare story rite? Which 1 u wanna be? Fast but never reach the finishing line Or slow & steady & wins the race?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] lilien98:
But that´s not the question. Is somebody prefers good battery life he should get good battery life. Those looking for a faster device should get it as well. It´s a Note, not an Iphone...:victory:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] brolee93:
what is the best volatage C or B ?

What is difference ?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] shaolin95:
They are reliable and can be used to compare performance on your phone as long as you use also real life applications. For me they go hand to hand.

I already did a "myth buster" video about Quadrant and people claiming is unreliable so please do not misinform.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ronfsp:
Ya buy more batteries & u can happily take ur time charging them 1 by 1... Very efficient indeed:good:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] hotelier1984:
Why do i need to charge them 1 by 1? It seems you need a crash course on mobile phone accessories
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Neuralgia:
Sorry for the noob question, but I have 3.0.15-franco.kernel running in stock Samsung Android...

Which version should I install? Standard? Overclocked?

I have CWM installed, so I'd rather do it with the zip file... no idea how to use ODIN.

D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] shaolin95:
Oh wow yeah that reply he gave was Epic! :laugh:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] :
Latest overclocked works with almost any phone cwm zip is fine
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ronfsp:
Ur comments r useless! How many batteries u have btw? Buying a few more batt?! Geezz... How long do u intend to keep ur current phone? Note 2 is coming i certianly wun keep the note for too long! Not to mention getting another batt & a charger. Do u think it's wise for ppl to get more accessories & batt juz to keep up with a kernel dat drains batt like hell? Maybe a 28 years old( juz a guess from ur nick) like u dat earn a big buck can afford it....Well i dunno... But certainly getting "more" batteries to keep up with a phone with juice thirsty kernel is really a no brainer...If someone complain abt battery issues do u think Gavin will ask them to get more batteries? Go ponder...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] lamole492:
Yep they are. I think im going back to 9.o i did not have that problem there. Any duggestions?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Peter Unger:
I made an "unfix" ZIP :) You can download it there:

http://kirk.chsinet.com/v4_WiFi_Un-Fix.zip
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] elk2210:
Come on guys, do your off-topic talk anywhere else.

Gesendet von meinem GT-N7000 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] panyan:
your phone never drew 1A from your laptop for 2 reasons:

1) the kernel had the same fastcharge value as speedmod: 650mA, now it has been reduced between speedmod and stock

2) a normal usb cannot provide 1000mA

:)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] chulme01:
Yeh +1 my battery is great used my phone for 13 hours with sync on H+ and music still have 60% on the ex kernel and those hated current scores of over 5000 sounds perfect to me and I agree the last few pages have just been people moaning lol.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] zetnord:
group B :

on 1600 mhz --> 1325 mv

group C :

on 1600 mhz --> 1250 mv

back to post #4043 and #4044 maybe explain more detail :o
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] elevul:
Just put it as a choice.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] brolee93:
Thanks :)

conclusion voltage C is the best :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] jeriz:
Why not use pm and stop hating in gavins corner of xda... Very disrespectful to somone that gives so much for free pleas stop it
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] elk2210:
Please, can someone in front of a PC report these spammers?

Gesendet von meinem GT-N7000 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] zetnord:
yes i guess so..your chip can handle less voltage in that frequency maybe more battery efficient :good:

+1..hating each other useless..better find what the main benefit for all of us .. at least appreciate what Gavin already did for this forum
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] oka1:
From the Moderator

To all in this Thread

..........THIS THREAD HAS BEEN CLEANED........

Please stay on topic and do not spam or flame

Thanks, oka1
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] sotmax:
I think my device love always one version before :P

Now it loves so much v10 for some reason.

The only think is a little bit of battery drain...not much i can live with that...but that version makes my device fly....

) ) ) over the air on Galaxy Note ( ( (
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] alekhkhanna:
Nah. Haven't tried any ROM or kernel since Gavin's came out. :P

Will probably try some later when I'm free.

Thanks for the input.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] dingolino:
Hi

is there any chance to have this value not hardcoded but as a setting?

On the one hand side if I charge over night, less current would be good to have less stress for the battery, on the other side - as I mentioned earlier in some situations a faster charging speed would be helpfull (for example when using the phone for navigation)

Best regards,

dingolino
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ardicli2000:
Folks,

First of all, Come on!!! The thread has been cleaned because lots of people are talking off topic, and/or thar are complaining but not helping/feedbacking.

Seriously, what you are doing are really annoying to those who read the thread from very beginning such as to me. And I cannot think of the developer.

Please read before you flash, ask nad/or search at least what you are looking for.

Secondly, who are complaining about LOWER benchmark results. GO BACK TO THE version which you have HIGHER scoes. It s obvious that your hardware and software combination likes the previous. Why do you push all the time? Last does not necessarily mean the best. You must NOT use the latest version all the time. (And I am asking seriously; Can you not use your phone without benchmark apps???)

Plus those who complain about anything, refer your Rom, ICS version, radio, tweaks, init.d scripts etc, etc. Do not just complain, help developer to understand.

Thirdly, Those who are asking how to flash and those who complain about rar files, and NOOBs. Your Attention please.

If your phone is already rooted (which I belive so...) Install HC-kTool. It is free. (I am not advertsing nor earning coins from the app)

Extract the zImage files from either .tar, .zip or rar file. And put it into /sdcard.

Then open HC-kTool. And click flash zImage fie from /sdcard/zImage.

Then reboot.

That's it. You flashed kernel. You do not have to do anything else. Your binary count did not increse and so on.....

Last but not least, DroidVPN works fine with v11-std. You can revert to it which is very simlar to 11.1.

As for me, I have never ever installed any custom Rom, or init.d scripts or tweaks. Using totally pure stock Rom with magnificient NoteCore Kernel. And I have NEVER EVER had a problem with wifi, gps, radio, bluetooth, performance, etc. This is very much the same with what developer claims.

If you have a problem which dev or any other people do not have, then it is DEFINITELY, ABVIOUSLY, TOTALLY because of something you have done to yor Rom and phone. I hardly believe (actually do not believe) that you have an untouched Rom. This Kernel is based on TW rom. First flash o stock TW Rom, then flash kernel then complain, if you still have a problem...

Finally nad most importantly, THANK YOU VERY MUCH GAVIN. It is perfect what you have done out there.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Shuff:
Wow ! Great improvment and optimization with 11.1.

My Quadrant score jump to 5176 oO

Really, really nice job ;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] panyan:
if im not mistaken that would have to be a rom+kernel thing, not just a kernel
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] norrgrd:
Anyone else with voltage group C experiencing huge battery drains after upgrade to v11.1 OC?

I've had no problems whatsoever with the earlier kernels (tried every version, with 6.1 by far being the most battery friendly) and I've done no modifications at all. No new apps, scripts (have none) or other tweaks.

My setup:

Setcpu with screen off 500 - 500 Mhz

Setcpu with screen on 200 - 1600 Mhz

CPU Sleeper (to turn off one core when screen off)

Edit: No problems with deep sleep

While writing this post I've lost 9% (3 minutes) .

Better battery does not show any thing fishy at all.

Reverting to 6.1 to see if there's any difference.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] brockyneo:
my valtage group is B not sure is this a good thing lol:silly:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] g.lewarne:
I have been watching this thread today and have not been impressed frankly.

To all my regular users, and everyone else with common sense, thankyou for attempting to keep it a nice place.

It is very disappointing to see things degenerate the way they did before a moderator intervened. I dont want to take the stance that other kernel makers have done and basically post an update and disappear until the next version. But seriously, the amount of posts from people who cant even seem to read just a few posts / 1 page back frankly astounds me.

I am also now receiving a huge amount of PMs form users who have not been members long enough to post in the developers forum. The stance I am taking with them is the same as i will take here, now, for a while at least - that of not even bothering to answer questions that have been answered countless times already.

I have spent *all* day working on what i hoped to be a big contribution to the XDA / Note community. It is basically a "kernel kitchen" for the Note.

Since it would seem its going to get downloaded and unsucessfully used by hundred of people who have no idea what they are doing, it will now be limited to being included with my source code releases only. Again, for the moment. It is a shame as anyone with a Linux computer would have been able to use it, without having any real knowledge of compiling kernels.

Anyway, To sum up,

I can only rely on the feedback from our regular users, and myself. I shall no longer take on board any requests, suggestions, or bug reports, ESPECIALLY BATTERY LIFE from anyone else. There are simply too many variables to take into consideration.

If you want to make a comment - READ THE THREAD. If it has been asked before, dont ask it again.

Laslty, remember i make this kernel for ME. It is my choice to share it. I dont get paid to make it. I do it in my spare time. Im trying to be as helpful as i can. Dont abuse my generosity or willingness to assist.

v11.3 out in a while ;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ChrisHaze1:
I don't think thats 100% accurate....As Gavin said, the Voltage for 1600mHz was just copypasted from 1400mHz, which would most likely be unstable.

Id like to see the Voltages from someone of group C with Kernel 11.1 OC and some stability tested, then we could say if A<B<C (voltage-wise)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] shaolin95:
Good post mate. We support you. :thumbup:

Sent from the Mighty Note International!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] clandestino123:
well said. This thread has gone crazy ! ha ha. I remember the good old days of v1.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Sean_FD2R:
F5....F5.... Lol. Awaiting for new release.

v1? Tested since RC...Lol

sent via Gallardo N7k 2.0