yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] alireza17mah:
Sorry for my off topic post.

Does this karnel(ivendor new karnel)works on remics?

I don't get the answer in another topic
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] OurJerry:
no this karnel doesn't work with remics. i get a bootloop.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] 30adi:
why don"t you give try? if you read a bit this thread you can see that is not released for daily use, it"s steel in developement.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] adomm420:
Now I'm not sure where to post bugs, so I'll post here and in q&a.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Arco is working on the Kernel LIKE A BAWS!!

65 Commits :good:

https://github.com/arco/samsung-kernel-msm7x30/compare/57f73389b2...beeed32ce1
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Keinbockwurst:
Thats a bug of the adreno sources. :(

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] DualJoe:
16 authors? Not bad...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Pyrology:
Can anyone confirm that 3x kernel flies our phone?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] adomm420:
What do you mean?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] VisualTech48:
If you mean does it boot? Then the answer is YES!

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1938811
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Christopher83:
I think he means if there will be improvements in performance with the new 3.0 kernel...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] adomm420:
I've tried 3.x for ics experimental and it was rrealy smooth for an experimental.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Keinbockwurst:
I can confirm this.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rahilsayed:
Plzz tel me how to install this kernel and plzz i m not seein any link but .gz files

Help me find the kernel download link and how to install it??
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] dbx4:
There is no kernel yet!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] cezaralboiu:
When will it be released?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] oisis:
When we will find coder :).
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] shubham412302:
the great CoDeRuS may help.........
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
Is there anyone who works on porting the 3.0.8 kernel to the i9001 ?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] pp910317:
while i search information about transplant kernel, i find someone provide a way ,i do not know whether it works. here is:

Use an official Linux2.6.36 and we provide Android kernel Linux2.6.36 compare, form a patch, and then put the patch to Linux3.0 .

here is the webside(in chinese): http://bbs.witech.com.cn/thread-12104-1-1.html

sorry for my poor english
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EternalFame:
Galaxy 3 got 3.4.x booted :P

xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1644204
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
does this help for a port to i9001 ? :(
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Keinbockwurst:
Not much. Useless for us.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
Also found other sources for the devil-kernel (3.0.8 and higher with newest code):

https://github.com/DerTeufel

can that help in porting 3.x.x to i9001 ?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] vpupkin:
I tried to port 3.0 kernel yesterday and I must say that there is a lot of work to do.

The main problem is samsung sound codec (qdsp5v2) - it will not be very easy to make it work;
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
3 words.

You are awesome. :thumbup:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] pierpa86:
i have call my guru of Linux and tomorrow we start the mission for help to porting kernel... :highfive: we try
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
vpipkin, would be really great, if you can fix the rest, even if it takes the time. :p
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] texten:
maybe these informations are interesting.

More info about HWA:

Ideally we would want a 3.0 kernel to do it 'properly' but that is a lot (read very very very difficult) of work and imo it's not worth it.

What should be done instead is backport the kgsl driver from cafs msm-3.0

This is an issue for all 8x50 (qsd8k)( adreno200) device's. ie n1, desire, inc, evo4g, and all the others

Right now I'm feeling left out as kali- did it for 7x30 (adreno205) and toastcfh did it for 8x60 (adreno220).

And if i am not mistaken they all use the same driver.

So someone could reference kali- and toastcfh work and get it going on adreno200​

source
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
S Plus has Adreno 205.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] texten:
HERE IS ADRENO 205
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rmbq:
Hi guys!

i'm trying to port 3.0 kernel on our devices.

the start point is the u8860 kernel, than i added some missing drivers (yda165,cypress-touchpad and qt602240_ts), merged the old board-ariesve.c with the new board-hw7x30.c and modified some Kconfig files.

this is only an initial release, no one had test this kernel on his i9001 (i can't because i haven't got a JIG), osis has proposed himself to test, so if there are good news i'll write here (or maybe in a new topic)

this is my github:

https://github.com/rmbq/tkiam

flash at your risk!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mangomonkey00:
hey can we use the ics kernel of those of htc desire hd as they have quite similar spec as that of ours

please reply

and if not why can we not use kernel of the other device and a way to port kerrnel if possible
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Huawei is better because it has exacly the same board.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] oisis:
Board is not everything, there is a lot of different hardware pices and the main thing: board specyfication.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
But specification of Huawei U8860 Honor and i9001 is excatly the same, even

in Chipset	Qualcomm MSM8255T Snapdragon and CPU 1.4 GHz Scorpion and GPU Adreno 205.

So it should be the right port source or not ?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] oisis:
It is better than others but still difficult.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mangomonkey00:
there is somethign about transplantation of kernel with patch something like that i no coder no modder or like that so i dint understood what it exactly says over there but i thought that all that thing written over there will help us heres the link

http://bbs.witech.com.cn/thread-468-1-1.html

please if someone can use this method i think we can have kernel 3.x please

at this moment i see that we are the only one who are left behind we dont have ics perfectly running yet where as galaxy s galaxy ace and other have

its not like i dont respect the work and devotion of all the devs and modder here but we are left behind guyzzz
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] iGunslinger:
someone tested it?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rmbq:
i'll give a look at the link, maybe it is usefull.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] cezaralboiu:
any news from 3.0.8 porting?:D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Keinbockwurst:
If there were some, the devs would post. :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] cezaralboiu:
yes..but, did you find a coder?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Keinbockwurst:
I dont think theres a coder working on this atm.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] cheehsiang:
no more hope for this phone to upgrade..

camera also last stage hanging

time to switch!!:)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] oisis:
Just wait guys, somebody is working on kernel :).
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
i9001 is not a rare sold device.

There should be no reason for "panic to stay on an ice island alone" :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] pp910317:
i believe you and your team, just do it~~~O(∩_∩)O~
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] vpupkin:
Maybe someone but not me. I actually realized that all this mess with porting newer android versions, kernels etc. is pointless. All that mess that samsung placed in linux kernel is just unportable. Actually it's a work around couple of weeks or even month if you use the whole working day for it, and I don't want to spend so much time for nothing, because it's just like trying to polish a pile of ****. All blames to samsung, sorry guys. I'm back to Gingerbread.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mangomonkey00:
Has anyone tested the kernel made by igunslinger

oisis was going to test it what are the results
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] SilenceSea:
while will you do some work fix the cm7 call volume?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] iGunslinger:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=29504760 <-- its not my kernel:)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mangomonkey00:
oh! sorry but hass anyone checked it is it working or not
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] m0e_03:
Thats a great move actually.. I mean come on, scamsung hasnt released anything for us yet (it doesnt we mean dont try), but come on..why waste so much time and energy on something that's not meant for us yet? Stick to Gingerbread and cm7..its way better and stable guys..port the new features from value packs or ics to cm7 (like, panorama, face unlock, etc..etc.) to cm7 and make it better before moving to a later version of android..cm7 is not even complete yet. lol

At least maybe all join n work together to fix that in-call volume issue.. ^_^
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] FinnAndJake:
that makes sense...im shocked that this device cant get a stable cm7...even my old device s5830 aka ACE got official cm7....
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
Is someone still trying to port this kernel here: [DEV][Kernel]Porting kernel 3.0.8

Or does it make no sense any more ?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rmbq:
I'm waiting for a jig from cina (when it arrives i'll begin tests)

Inviato dal mio GT-I9001 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
so, hope the best :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
Hi there,

I'm new in dev-section, so sorry, if I do something wrong.

I'm also trying to port and I succeeded in compiling. After creating a boot.img, my phone hangs in bootloop, so I only can restart in recovery.

My question now is if there is a possibility to see a log of that boot or how to notice if there isn't a log, because the kernel could hang before initiating the log. I tried /proc/kmsg but I think the recovery writes something in there.

hahnjo
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] oisis:
Once i compiled some console drivers and i could see log from booting kernel even if it fails, somewhere in Device Drivers and Graphics or something like that, don't remember now(you have to also switch off boot logo i think). Secound option is to use android emulator but is not so easy. If you want can post some links later on for emulator. I'm busy right now to search for them.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
First boot

Hi there,

I managed to compile a Kernel that boots a bit and then shows a memory dump. Sources can be found on my github (https://github.com/hahnjo/android_kernel_samsung_ariesve). It's Kernel version 3.0.21 (common Android Kernel on Google is also this version). For compiling, use ariesve_defconfig, ariesve_rev00_defconfig is the Samsung config. Boot.img can also be downloaded here (No warranty and no real usage, just for devs!):

http://www.mediafire.com/?65d6oe0dcs7eidx

hahnjo

@devs: I think error is board-ariesve.c, define MSM_FB_PRIM_BUF_SIZE. It is too high, but I don't know, which values have to be filled in...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] omegaRED7:
Why don't you try to use the same value for the 2.6.35.xx kernel, sources are available on arco's github
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rmbq:
i'll try
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] oisis:
Maybe the way is to use this file board-msm7x30.c, and take this parameters from there?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rmbq:
atm there are this value (for MSM_FB_PRIM_BUF_SIZE)

EDIT:

can we have got some logs or can we debug if the kernel stuck at "SAMSUNG"?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
@values from board-msm7x30.c=> these are the values from there. I just copied :D

@logs: No, adb isn't starting, because init.rc runs after initialising the memory a.s.o.

I'm also currently testing with other values
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rmbq:
why are you sure that the error is there?

in arco kernel the value is

roundup((864 * 480 * 4 * 3), 4096) /* 4bpp * 3 Pages */

and

roundup((864 * 480 * 4 * 2), 4096) /* 4bpp * 2 Pages */

also the value of MSM_PMEM_SF_SIZE is different, is arco's is 0x1700000
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
No more sure. But I will try with MSM_PMEM_SF_SIZE. In board-msm7x30.c, the value is also 0x1700000

Edit: Also doesn't work. Same memory dump. I will break for now, I will continue this evening or tomorrow :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Harrocan:
Nice work... If this be work, be great.. :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rmbq:
ok guys i've got news.

with my new build (i'll up to my github soon) the "SAMSUNG" screen is shown, after black screen and then the "SAMSUNG GALAXY S plus GT-9001 (powered by broodkernel)" screen (i've got broodrom business 1.2 before arco's CM9 with modified kernel) then reboot....
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Harrocan:
Logcat?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rmbq:
atm no, i'm going to the beach :P! this everning i'll try (i dunno if i can use adb)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
I also worked on it and noticed, that the display driver wasn't included in my build but also not on rmbq's github. I don't know, if he already added it in his new build.

But I don't have the second boot logo :(
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rmbq:
i've got the second boot logo using (and changing) your source code because for something it's better than mine (probably i made mistake in board-ariesve.c)

what you mean for "display drivers"? the qt602240_ts.c?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
No, under drivers/video/msm the file "lcdc_s6e63m0.c". Look also my commit on github. I also detected that there are other missing configs and drivers. In fact all these configurations are missing:

CONFIG_ASK_IP_FIB_HASH=y
CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS=y
CONFIG_USB_OTG=y
CONFIG_OEM_CAMERA=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_PCOMP=y
CONFIG_MSM_RPCSERVERS=y
CONFIG_MSM_SDIO_CTL=y
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_ADDRTYPE=y
CONFIG_MMC_MSM_PROG_DONE_SCAN=y
CONFIG_NOP_TRACER=y
CONFIG_FONT_8x8=y
CONFIG_KEYBOARD_PMIC8058=y	// solved
CONFIG_MMC_MSM_SDC3_DUMMY52_REQUIRED=y
CONFIG_TRACING=y
CONFIG_HAVE_MLOCK=y
CONFIG_USB_ANDROID_RNDIS_DWORD_ALIGNED=y
CONFIG_USB_ANDROID_RMNET=y
CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING=y
CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y
CONFIG_IP_FIB_HASH=y
CONFIG_USE_QUP_I2C=y
CONFIG_SUSPEND_NVS=y
CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y
CONFIG_VIBETONZ=y
CONFIG_USB_GADGET_MSM_72K=y
CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND=y
CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB=y
CONFIG_PMIC8058_UPL=y
CONFIG_MSM_KGSL_CONTEXTS=32
CONFIG_DEBUG_ERRORS=y
CONFIG_CFG80211_DEFAULT_PS_VALUE=0
CONFIG_MSM_KGSL_MMU=y
CONFIG_SENSORS_ORIENTATION=y
CONFIG_APPLY_GA_SOLUTION=y
CONFIG_DPRAM=y
CONFIG_MSM_RMNET_SDIO=y
CONFIG_NF_NAT_SNMP_BASIC=y
CONFIG_SENSOR_CE147=y
CONFIG_HAS_TLS_REG=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEBUG=y
CONFIG_MMC_MSM_SDC2_DUMMY52_REQUIRED=y
CONFIG_APPSBOOT_3M_CONFIG=y
CONFIG_VIDEO_IR=y
CONFIG_SAMSUNG_FM_SI4709=y
CONFIG_MSM_DEBUG_UART_NONE=y
CONFIG_IR_CORE=y
CONFIG_RTC_PM8058=y
CONFIG_BOARD_REVISION=0x00
CONFIG_VIDEO_V4L1=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ=y
CONFIG_SENSORS_YDA165=y
CONFIG_MSM_PARAM=m
CONFIG_PMIC8058_NFC=y
CONFIG_USB_GADGET_SELECTED=y
CONFIG_YAFFS_SHORT_NAMES_IN_RAM=y
CONFIG_FB_MSM_HDMI_COMMON=y
CONFIG_SENSOR_S5KA3DFX=y
CONFIG_PM_OPS=y
CONFIG_SENSORS_YAS529_MAGNETIC=y
CONFIG_USB_ANDROID_RNDIS_WCEIS=y
CONFIG_MODEM_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_VIDEO_ALLOW_V4L1=y
CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS=y
CONFIG_DIAG_CHAR=y
CONFIG_OPTICAL_GP2A=y
CONFIG_BT_HID=m
CONFIG_ANDROID_PMEM_KAPI_TEST=m
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_BARRIERS=y
CONFIG_KERNEL_DEBUG_SEC=y
CONFIG_MAX17043_FUEL_GAUGE=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y
CONFIG_FONT_8x16=y
CONFIG_SENSORS_BMA023_ACCEL=y
CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER_TESTS=y
CONFIG_BATTERY_ARIESVE=y
CONFIG_COMMON_CLKDEV=y
CONFIG_VIDEO_V4L1_COMPAT=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_LAST_BIT=y
CONFIG_FLATMEM_MANUAL=y
CONFIG_DPRAM_WHITELIST=y
CONFIG_DONT_RESERVE_FROM_MOVABLE_ZONE=y
CONFIG_MMC_MSM_SDIO_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_HAVE_MLOCKED_PAGE_BIT=y
CONFIG_USB_F_SERIAL=y
CONFIG_CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER=y
CONFIG_INOTIFY=y
CONFIG_KERNEL_SEC_MMICHECK=y

hahnjo
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rmbq:
ok.. i alredy know that some settings are missing but i maybe they aren't essential for boot
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
I also don't think that all are needed. But I will check now every config in the list I posted and look whether I think they are needed. If you took my sources, could you please post which changes you made?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rmbq:
of course, now i make a test with your new changes and i'll post...

EDIT:

now "SAMSUNG" is show up and then black screen.... bah
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mrjraider:
I hope you guys can pull this of.

Keep up the good work.....
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mangomonkey00:
is there any further progress on this friends because we all are waiting for this

also i have found that xperia arc s has got official ics and specs are most similar to us maybe it can help for comparing or some sort of that thing
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broodplank1337:
Porting a whole kernel is a REALLY BIG job, and in some cases even impossible, so saying "we are all waiting for this". is not really true/fair. I think it's a great job if anyone gets it to boot at all.. (and I don't mention the rest of all issues to be solved), So deactivate your waiting state and see what the time will bring us :silly:

@rmbq: Make sure you use a correct ramdisk also, the wrong "init" file or init.rc values could mess everything up without you noticing it, and thinking the zImage is actually the problem.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] omegaRED7:
And may I ask, why is everyone waiting on this?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mrjraider:
Because kernel 3.x is more compatible with ICS and JB.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] omegaRED7:
What do you mean more compatible, what specific gains do you expect from the v3 kernel? Right now we have close to 99% working ICS. Porting a newer kernel won't automagically make ICS/CM9/AOKP work 100% and stable and faster and more battery efficient and ...

Don't get me wrong, I too hope the guys can make it, but "everyone's waiting on this", is, like brood said, neither true nor fair/realistic expectation.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
I think this shouldn't be discussed in dev-section. So back to topic:

Does now anyone know how to get logs / deeper information if adb isn't ready? I read about the possibility of printing log messages on the screen or maybe also using something serial console, but I tried a lot which didn't work...

hahnjo
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rmbq:
i read about the "printk" function, maybe you seen this function in the code... it print messages before adb i think but i dunno how to use it
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
It is used very much and it is for generating logs. But I don't know how I could access that log. ADB isn't starting because I think the Kernel hangs before...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broodplank1337:
place the adbd service on top @ init.rc (ramdisk), then you might find out :good: if it's already on the top then I don't know how to get the log actually
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
It is added (I took the init file from arco's github), but I think the kernel hangs before executing this init file, maybe while initialisation... So I see atm no possibility to start adb at all
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broodplank1337:
Are you sure the init file s the right one? (and I don't mean init.rc but just "init"). You should get it out of a boot.img's ramdisk (which is a 3.0.8 kernel)

Attached the init file from a 3.0.8 kernel which actually boots, is it the same size as your current init file?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mrjraider:
Well, if you look to the GT-I9000, they have an custom made 3.0.8 kernel. The ICS roms are more stable than the ones for our GT-I9001. We all know that the kernel is the base for a ROM and with an better kernel you'll get most of the time also a better ROM. You dont hear me say that the ICS roms we have atm are bad.. No they are good, but with an working 3.0.8 kernel they will be better. And that is what we want.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broodplank1337:
Your theory on that it should work better, with ICS/JB is right, but the thing is. the complete building of the working cm9 kernel takes about the same time to only boot this kernel properly. you know what i mean?

It's like patching windows 98 to windows 7, step by step

And the i9000 always has been a popular device the developments for that are more then 1000 times the development of the i9001 :')

Everything is supported by the i9000, probably mostly caused by the very common board that's inside.

The i9001 is just samsungs toilet. and they don't care at all that we do so much effort to develop, they just sit there and **** on us :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
My one is 0.2 KB smaller, but also this one doesn't work...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
I think I've done a step forward: I mastered to build arco's kernel with printing all logs to screen. I will now try, if this also works for Kernel 3.0 ;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Klarostorix:
Sound great!

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S Plus using Simplistic Plus Final I
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] cezaralboiu:
i think that we must port this kernel! all the other phones have 3.0+ and the port becomes very hard.. if we port 3.0.8, we can port cm9 and cm10 without any bugs anid in shorttime.

thanks!;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] oisis:
Could you tell what you changed in kernel? I made the same few weeks ago but don't remember now how I did it :). Thanks.

I'm sure it will works for kernel 3.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
Sorry, I'm currently very busy with private life.

I tried to apply the changes to 3.0, but it didn't work. I also tried lots of other possibilities, but it also didn't work.

When I'm back to my computer, I can upload a patch, you can apply to arco's kernel and this worked for me.

hahnjo
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] cezaralboiu:
is it booting?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
No, unfortunately not. In the worst case, the driver for the display panel doesn't work. Does anyone know, if there is another device with the same display and official, working 3.0 kernel?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Klarostorix:
Usual Galaxy S i9000 afaik has the same display.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S Plus using Simplistic Plus Final I
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Skar3:
I agree, the galaxy s has the same screen of our device
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Blumdum:
But the galaxy s doesnt have an official 3.0 Kernel ;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
but perhaps it has a working 3.x kernel ?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Blumdum:
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_samsung_aries
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hahnjo:
But the kernel sources from cyanogenmod doesn't have the file lcdc_s6e63m0.c and lcdc_s6e63m0.h...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] oisis:
I9000 has totally different hardware so is not best choice for us.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] BzArEx:
Yes that's true but super amoled screens from i9000 and i9001 are replaceable. All other things are different.