yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] creepyncrawly:
I don't own the device either. I've had the SGS II for nine months, and the flash counter has never been incremented. I wouldn't trip my flash counter just to gain information. But that's just me (and my mild OCD). :) Anyway, thanks for the information. I'm going to guess for now that the SGS III functions like the SGS II, that only flashing a custom kernel through download mode will increment the flash counter, and I'll continue to look for that answer. I hate giving out false or misleading information.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] drothenberger:
Flashing Team Epic's recovery also trips the flash counter, and that tar.md5 file includes only recovery.img. So, I assume that flashing an unofficial recovery also trips the counter.

On the other hand, the "no counter" root method includes only a modified system.img.ext4 file, so it appears they are not checking the system image.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] creepyncrawly:
Yeah, I just found Chainfire's original insecure kernel post, re the I9300. He indicated that kernel and recovery both increment the flash couner. Also, I already had my answer about system image, if I even thought about it, since MrRobinson's stock plus root tar does not trip the flash counter, and contains a mofidied system. Doh on me.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] AdamLange:
There are many ways to root it ;P without topping of counter but untill i get my device i cant test them ;)
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] kobos311:
I'm just going to laugh like hell about this post. I've been saying the same thing to RedruM about the posts on the SGIII discussions, its like no one gets ODIN and CWM but knows how to use one of them...

They'll never learn..I still get asked all the time about being a sense kernel..lmfao or <insert random other thing that isn't relevant to that device whats o ever..>

haha *facepalm*

---------- Post added at 09:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:11 PM ----------

Why is everyone so worried about their flash counter anyway, you know we'll figure out a method to get it untripped and unrooted.. we always do somehow? Plus...seriously if you're gonna brick, you're gonna brick. This is why you get the bestbuy protection plan or something else..that overrides the factory warranty (well replaces the factory warranty) besides with the possible unbricking methods out there, its seriously hard to kill a samsung. though we don't have a usb jig yet, we do have the resistor route of download mode..
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Franky_V:
Thanks for the kernel!
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] kobos311:
Hopefully, A BIG HOPEFULLY lol I'll have mine compiled up tonight or tomorrow...even if not oc'd (which im debating just going to 1700ish for now, if I do, I'm already getting 7100 Benchmarks, for all of you who base rom speed/kernel speed off of them..lol

So, yeah thanks for the insecure!
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] jxs1984:
got an error when flashing the 747kernel.zip
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] drothenberger:
Here's a zip that works. It also includes the stock kernel modules, so you can use it to go back to stock if you're running ktoonsez's KT747 kernel.

This zip actually deletes all the existing kernel modules and replaces them with the stock ones. I did this because there are more modules in the KT747 kernel and I didn't know if leaving the ones that aren't in stock there would cause problems. If you prefer a zip that doesn't do that, look here.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] jsmasterx:
how do you achieve 7100? i am curious and interested
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] saqi4you:
i have S3 i747m with bell unlocked i want to use with windmobile(t-mobile)what should i do plz guide me step by step thanks
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] AdamLange:
go to tmobile thread then.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] jxs1984:
thanks! just what i need :)
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] magn2o:
Didn't see one posted, so I put together an insecure, stock UCALG1 kernel. This has been repacked using ChainFire's rooted adbd. So, yes, adb remount works. :)

Flashable via Odin or Mobile ODIN.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] ducksauce88:
My phone has I747UCLG1 on it, not UCALG1. Will this still work for me?
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] ProBoner:
You should post your phone on kijiji or craigslist and buy another one. The 747 from bell/telus/rogers is different from the phone Wind sells. Wind has the 999 which is the same model that T-mobile sells. They're all called galaxy S3 but they aren't exactly the same phones.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] xijar:
His phone is unlocked according to his post so it should still work on their network. Does all the same 2g and 3g bands but one that the T-Mobile one does. Not sure about lte though. He should just need to get a sim for the other provider assuming he is truly unlocked. Unlocking is also a fairly easy task on the sgs3. Probably more cost effective and less risky than selling one to buy the other.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] y2whisper:
Started a thread before finding this old one. is it at all possible to get an updated version of these kernels for JB?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ashtiany:
In clockwork recovery I press mount USB storage to get the storage to show up, but nothing is coming up on my laptop. I need to a flash a new rom and my internal memory has been formatted.

I also can't boot up in my current rom, it just freezes on boot :(

Please help!
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MJDdeLacerda:
It's normal doesn't mount USB storage with the original CWM/kernel. To solve it install/flash another one (Siyah, Fluxxi, etc).

About it doesn't boot your current rom, back-up all the information and format/wipe everything.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] salineBoy:
I'm having the same problem, only with a HTC One M8. When I connect to my Imac and select "Mount USB Storage" , I get nothing on screen. I'm using an Imac with Yosemite.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] harveydent:
US judge grants injunction on Galaxy Nexus

Those on the fence better get their GNex now before it's too late

"Apple first asked for an injunction on US sales of Samsung's Galaxy Nexus devices back in February, and the court has now ruled, granting the motion and imposing a ban. "
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SocialReject:
Smh...

Apple, Apple, Apple... When will you learn.

Sent from the future.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] androidsc:
And it timed so well with 4.1 release. This is not how you take down android. Android is a machine,a movement. apple is a fruit. Just shows how desperate they are. Probably paid the judge.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JaiaV:
For some reason I'm reminded of this:

Anyways, to quote the article for the patents Apple is claiming have been infringed:

Essentially, some of these patents are the very same patents Apple has been attacking other Android OEMs, such as HTC, for. They're going after basic Android functions, but rather than going for Google directly, they're attacking OEMs. This is the closest they've come to attacking Google directly for these particular patents, AFAIK. If you ask me, some of them are rather inane, such as slide-to-unlock and text suggestions.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] adrynalyne:
http://www.google.com/patents/US20090249247

Poking a sleeping dragon, they are.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SocialReject:
Didn't they file the same injunction to stop the Galaxy S III from being sold?

Irritating...

Sent from the future.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JaiaV:
That patent hasn't been granted yet, and is FAR more specific to Android's implementation than Apple's very vague, rather inclusive patents that have been granted. Which is highly unfortunate.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] bozzykid:
I love how Apple is getting judges to grant injunctions based on their actionable links patent when theirs is so limiting. At least with Android those links can let the user decide which app is used to open that object.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Pitnefor:
this makes me so fing mad. i want to smash something. F U APPLE!!!!!!!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Theshawty:
Apple, Apple, Apple, when will you learn? I am certain Androids eat apples for breakfast, so come at us.

Reading this article almost made me smash my entire laptop and desk in rage. Apple is do damn power hungry.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] I Am Marino:
The Nexus looks nothing like the iPhone, I don't get why they chose the GNex.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] phatmanxxl:
Reading that gave me a headache :silly:

---------- Post added at 05:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:48 PM ----------

Jellybean is gonna kill iOS, that is all. Funny this happens weeks before the update is pushed.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Exodian:
Its not looks they went after. It is specific features/actions like swiping to unlock.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lowandbehold:
No point in getting mad. Apple is just showing their desperation. It will get over turned, just like the Evo and One X. The way Google is partnering with everyone else against apple...it is only a matter of time before they strike.

Oh yea..and I'm definitely not mad! They can't come take my Nexus away!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] bozzykid:
Luckily Google no longer has the swipe to unlock feature (they have to move the circle into the other circle feature). I doubt the judge agreed that that particular patent was infringing on the Nexus ICS device even though Apple hoped it was. It sounds like the judge used the universal search patent and the actionable links patent to make this injunction.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Drzfr3shboialex:
I feel like the judges are all apple biased

Sent from my Aokp'd Nexus Prime
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Exodian:
Looks like it is an issue that has to deal with a search feature that apple claims is a direct siri patent infringement
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Jameslepable:
I don't understand injunctions, how can you ban a product based on software that isn't even the same and also before it been proven to infringe on it. It seems to me like the judge is basically deciding outcomes before a trial.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] xdp:
Very depressing. I guess a tenth of a trillion dollars in Apple's bank accounts isn't enough for them. Software patents are so broken.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ceribaen:
Considering the actionable linking patent is essentially describing hypertext behaviour, I'm surprised that's not FRAND or equivalent by now.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] grawkiller73:
I'm talking about their revenues, not their profits. And no, Google cannot just magically "wipe" Apple off the map. Wishful thinking.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] anton2009:
You do realize that the net income you are referring to is it's first quarter income? I.e. they made approximately 120bil total, and 40bil net last year.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Google_Nexus:
I think Google should buy apple. Seems.less.expensive the. Defending in court.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] anton2009:
Except that Apple is worth more than all of Google combined... so the only entity buying anybody would be Apple buying Google.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] sharkoparko:
Your Google Play Order from Jun 29, 2012 Has Shipped

So, for now they still keep shipping beside the judge decision. Its not too late ,yet
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] grawkiller73:
Google isn't nearly as big as you think. Apple is the biggest tech company out right now, correct me if I'm wrong.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Jayrod1980:
Apple is the most valuable and profitable company in the world... Google cannot buy apple.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] anton2009:
Samsung #1

Apple #6

Google #32

But also Apple has largest Market Capitalization by at least 2x from any company

Link
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] isinisterx:
Apple is obviously bigger than Google, but Google holds more powerful information such as chrome, Google, gmail...etc

They could make apples life a living hell should they choose too.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] akira02rex:
Microsoft rings a bell. Apple is turning in to a monopoly with these vague parents. Its ruining innovation because in order to make a tablet it cannot be square.. instead you have to make a triangular or octogon shaped tablet.. F you apple.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Jayrod1980:
Amen brother
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Google_Nexus:
Then if apple wants to stop android why not just buy Google?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] anton2009:
Lol. Do you really think the government would allow Apple to buy Google/Android? That would turn them into an even bigger monopoly than they are now, and it will definitely have horrible consequences. Google had to jump through hoops to even get to buy Motorola Mobility, and the US government did not allow the acquisition of T-Mobile by AT&T... so they will never allow two giants to buy one another out!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Jameslepable:
Google has a problem if the siri patent stands but I think there is a work around. Google now is essentially not siri as in it pools all your information into one data base because it know about you. It knows your music etc. Whereas siri knows nothing and so has to search Google/yelp/wolframalpha . Google now just searches the information it has on you and the internet if it can't find an answer (searches Google's own database) therefore IMO patent avoided.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Meaple:
Who cares. Like anything big is going to come out of this, no matter who wins.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] reece24:
That's jzt dirty..I feel like siri stole from Google search..I wish Droid could stop apple from using Google nd its apps
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ChrisAshton84:
Wow, yep, I was tired last night...

I see in my account now that it has a shipping label, so its on its way!!!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] PrinceFX:
Let's all send complaints to Apple!

www.apple.com/contact/feedback.html
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Hemlocke:
YEAH! And we could go toilet paper Apple's house and write nasty things about them on Facebook and Twitter.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Exodian:
But then they will sue you for slander and possibly some vague patent pertaining to 3 or more letter words that may contain the letter e.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] DroidDavi:
Nice banned a phone what 9 months old. Mean while the one line and the sgs3 are selling like hot cakes. Lol they even banned the gTab 10.1

The best part is the people who would buy the nexus wouldn't buy a iPhone even if it wasn't for sell

Any body wanna buy a banned phone

1000000000000 bucks you can't get this **** in the states no more
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] defconoi:
Which patents did they get it banned with and under what terms? Can a software update divert the ban?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] matt30:
Samsung would still have received a pecuniary benefit from those features even if they issued an update tomorrow (an update that would be difficult anyway considering you would need to coordinate with Google, the telecom corps, and your own software team).

I expect this came as somewhat of a surprise for Samsung.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] io53:
Oh man. This one surely knows what he is taking about...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Google_Nexus:
If we kick obama out of his illegal lease on the white house then romey will allow it I think. Obama bad for mergers just ask att...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] DroidDavi:
When did Obama join the FCC bored?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Google_Nexus:
Fcc is the pupet of obama
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Zorachus:
Just woke up, nice hangover.

Is this true, the Galaxy Nexus will stopped being sold ? This is Androids pure device, and best phone.

Why now 8 months after its release ?

I was gonna sell my Verizon Nexus, and get the unlocked Nexus in the Play Store.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Hexchain:
F**k you, Crapple. F**k you.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] TechAttack:
Anonymous and all the other hackers of the world should join up and bring Apple to its knees!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ingenious247:
What Apple is doing is suicide.

They are going after various Android manufacturers, who each have dozens of phones. If they block one phone, it's not the end for that mfg, just a huge inconvenience.

Once you have four or five Android mfgs going after Apple for patent infringement (which they will), only one has to succeed ONCE and guess what? Apple only has one phone. They get one injunction, and bye bye Apple profits.

I'm loving this. Just wait, you'll see

Sent from my brand new GALAXY SIII
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] itsDefying:
Decided to get the Nexus. Just placed my order, and they just received the payment.

Hopefully it ships.

(it should, however :P)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] PacerguyDon:
Verge update...

Update:" We've now had a chance to review the imposing 101 page injunction order and while there's obviously a lot going on, the core of the order is actually relatively simple. The court found that each of the four asserted Apple patents is likely infringed and valid, but only issued an injunction for infringement of the '604 patent. Judge Koh reasoned that unlike the other three patents, the '604 patent covered the highly valued unified search feature of Siri that contributed greatly to consumer demand for the iPhone 4S. Moreover, the court held that Android's infringing "Quick Search Box" feature was touted by Google as a "core user feature on Android" and, therefore, was also a key selling point for the Galaxy Nexus. From there the judge concluded that Apple would suffer irreparable harm in the form of significant lost market share if sales of the Galaxy Nexus, and its unified search capabilities, continued:

The Court is persuaded by the evidence in the record that the '604 unified search functionality drives consumer demand in a way that affects substantial market share. Even accepting Samsung's argument that the intelligent voice-recognition aspect of Siri, as advertised, also contributes to consumer interest in the iPhone 4S, Apple has shown that the '604 Patented feature is core to Siri's functionality and is thus a but-for driver of demand for Siri. Accordingly, the Court finds that Apple has adequately established the requisite causal nexus between Samsung's alleged infringement of the '604 Patent and Apple's risk of suffering irreparable harm."

What a bunch of BS! I sure didn't base my choice on buying a Nexus due to the quick search box. I doubt very highly anyone did.

Judge really needs to pull her head out of her butt!!!

FU Apple!!!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] harveydent:
Actually, since Google bought Motorola, they now own the patent to the cell phone, loosely speaking. But since it's FRAND, they'll be screwed if they try to use it.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Tbbo514:
Dude no its not..hear me out...it took the droids and other phones a year to just get ics... and 65% of phones still have gingerbread ..gingerbread is killing apple..jellybean will never see the day of light in the us on any phones for the next entire year I hate how these companies do...Samsung craps on their devices every year and so do other companies

Only reason my gnex is up to date is because Google manages my software updates because its their device ...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] TjPhysicist:
This whole situation is screwed up in so many ways. Why the galaxy nexus? It's not the only device out there that uses "universal search" functionality, nor is it the only one advertised with such. I suppose if you want to ttalk about "what damages apples sales more" they should be going after phones like HTC One X and Galaxy S II and III as those are, i am sure, a much bigger market share than Galaxy Nexus. And for that matter, Nexus 7 also has that feature, and in fact one of the biggest improvement of JB is the "google now", although different enough from SIRI, that patent is vague enough that if we have a judge who is a bit of an idiot, or a bit on the strict side (like this judge is apparently) no more JB, and basically potentially every Android is out.

Oh, but wait...3 years down the road, something else will come along, maybe M$'s mobile stuff will replace the android that is banned, but guess what...m$ ALSO uses unified search (as does EVERY phone and computer right now). In fact "google desktop" used to do that for my PC YEARS ago. This is the issue with patents like these, they are vague enough and "universally accepted standard" now that if we get the right judge, apple will be the ONLY smartphone allowed in the US altogether...

I could be wrong ofc, this is my understanding of the patent. What are google's options right now? and I mean they need to do something about this...FFS how many people must keep suing each other over patent crap ...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 3ddyz:
These patent cases are starting to seriously annoy me, they're like little children fighting over sweets. Apple is so greedy that they forget the need for competition in order to promote innovation, something their own products sorely miss. If Android wasn't around, iCrapOS would be exactly the same as on the day of its release... Oh, sorry, it is.

Apple are playing catch-up, too bad Google are leaps and bounds ahead of them. They're desperatly grasping at straws to minimize the enormous gap between the two OS's. Apple is for Appaling, Google is for Good :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mr mystery:
Pretty clear with Steve Jobs death Apple lost all its potential to innovate, patents are the only thing that can keep them on top. Really Fracking sad to see but really now that Jobs is gone the world could do without Apple.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] welchertc:
Not to mention, the quick search box has been around Android for a long time, with voice integration as well. My captivate had it. Wayyyyy before Siri was available. The only thing new about Siri was how it talked back to you. And even that probably wasn't new.

I will agree that Siri is the main selling point for a lot of people, but the quick search box isn't the main selling point of any Android phone. These judges are way too disconnected from this technology to be qualified to rule on this stuff.

All I can say is, c'mon mannnnn.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] arknailed7754:
Why's apple worried anyway they have multiple lines besides there crappy iOS run icraps. They got there loyal gullible's anyway lol

Yeah no worries I'll pay 40 quid a month and money on top for a phone that doesn't compare to a lot of others yeah...lol

Please note I hate apple for there lame phones but the I pods are top quality.the older ones anyway before they started the iOS touch screen crap. Still rocking my gen5.5 video.sweet
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lreyes:
If i had 10. Mins with the person of head on apple ill say this Wtf apple just get over it android is better with and without ur soo called slid to unlock wtf its just to unlock the device damn apple get ur **** together bcuz no matter what u do android will be right there on top of everything Google is everything Google pretty much owns u now apple Google made u its ***** do we allow u apple to use some Google apps on ur crappy iOS box filled with **** yes and does anyone see u guys trying to help one bit if Google didnt let u use ur Google apps and not even let iOS users go on any Google site ur ****ty box on money wasting apps will die out and u will lose money do u see Google during u for stupid crap? No now who ever is head in apple can now go suck googles d***

Sorry for my cursing and bad grammer but I know I proved a point
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] derekwilkinson:
i sure hope so...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Tomatoes8:
No but they might have get Google to release Android 3.9(or 3.8 depending on how much data tapping means to you) and make it a mandatory update. Then everyone would root.