yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III Q&A, (US Carriers)] jcbofkc:
Can't seem to find the option using touchwiz. Thank you for any help.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, (US Carriers)] jcbofkc:
Is it possible to remove the scroll indicator and still use touchwiz? Someone must know. Help me out.

Thanks!
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] mattpannella:
is there any way to have sense see the gmail app as an email app?

for example the productivity look screen will only show emails from the htc email app
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Hunt3r.j2:
Don't think so, gmail doesn't seem to be very integrated into htc sense.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] foxbat121:
You can forgo the gmail app and add your gmail account as exchange account to the default email app.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] dmjlabelle:
Can you explain what this does for you or even how it works. I would like to do the same os OP but don't understand about exchange.

Thanks
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] gunnyman:
easy peasy

add account and choose manual setup under server put m.google.com
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] rquinn19:
I have my other devices set up this way, but never thought to try it with Android because...well it's google. Do you prefer it that way? I've had Android since the G1 was released and never tried anything but the Gmail app
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] gunnyman:
I don't know if it's better or whatever, but I am using clean rom Dev edition and the AOSP email app so I can pinch to zoom I've read arguments that polling email this way uses less battery, but who knows. The only reason I remember the trick is because it was the only way to get push email from Gmail on my iPhone :D
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] c5satellite2:
I would also love gmail to be recognized as an email app.
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] D™:
The ICS version of Android has been a pretty strange one from the point of view of upgrades from manufacturers and also of the hacking community that are making custom ROM’s for Android phones, like the CyanogenMod team. That’s because ICS was a huge overhaul of Gingerbread. This is the reason it has taken (some) tablet manufacturers a couple of months to upgrade Honeycomb to ICS, but it has taken at least half a year to even start seeing upgrades from most manufacturers for smartphones. It even took Google itself 4 months to upgrade the Nexus S.

The ROM community didn’t have it any better, and it has taken them until recently to even get in the RC stage for their ROM’s. The camera app has been the hardest to fix for CM9/ICS because Google completely replaced the camera framework, to make it faster and more advanced, and this means that all phones needed new drivers for the camera so the app can work. This means that all the developers making ICS ROM’s had to rewrite the drivers for the new camera app. It’s one of the main reasons why it has taken so long for an ICS ROM to become stable (the same goes for manufacturers).While CM9 will only support a few dozen devices, there are many more developers who are making ROM’s for their own specific phone model, and they are basing those ROM’s on CM9. Why? Simply because of it’s cross-compatibility for many other devices, and its extra features and performance tweaks compared to stock Android.

Google I/O is tomorrow, and we’ll most likely see Android 4.1 not only announced, but also released, which means that the CM team will have no time to rest and will have to get started with adding the Android 4.1 improvements to CM9, or whatever they will be calling it (CM9.1, CM10 ?). They’ve already reached the RC1 stage for several devices today, and this version is coming for more next week.The RC1 stage is the one after beta, so unless some last-minute bugs show up before the stable release, it should be released a few weeks later.

The list of devices currently supported include devices such as the

Samsung Galaxy S,

Galaxy Tab,

Captivate,

Galaxy S II,

Galaxy Note,

Nexus S,

Galaxy Nexus,

LG Nitro HD,

Optimus Sol,

ASUS EeePad Transformer,

Transformer Prime,

Sony Xperia ray,

Xperia mini,

Xperia active,

HTC Sensation and many more..
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] 'cooleagle':
Hold your horses buddy, we need to have stable & working ICS in the first place to even think about getting Jelly Bean. :D

Let's also see what Jelly Bean is all about. Some of the speculations are Google's own Voice Assistant, Chrome out of beta, UI changes.
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] mj.vikram:
according to gsmarena Android 4.1 is not a big upgrade from ICS they are just replacing the Stock Android browser with Google Chrome as default browser....

Lets wait see what's new in 4.1......
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] D™:
Yes dear I m on hold by last 6 months now my horses really want to fly.. so its time when we can ask them to make If we are donating for the same then we can ask for Jelly bean also..what do you say..??:victory:
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] D™:
Yup dear, if its like that..then why not we ask for jelly bean for our ROYALE device...??:p
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] mj.vikram:
Buddy we will leave it to Epsylon let him decide what is the best he can give us, any how it will take some time to Google to release 4.1 source code....
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] D™:
hmmm..now again waiting..:angel:
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] chandrus1983:
what if we SGR users get Jelly Bean update, officially ??? lets wait buddy :D
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] bhargav143:
Hmm... Yes... Its just a minor upgrade....

However....it will be possible to port JB, if we get ICS successfully working....

All hopes on Epsylon.....

Fingers crossed.....

Sent via XDA App...

I am a noob here... but....I am a geek.... ;-)
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] D™:
till now we dont have ICS..bt we are hopping that, may JB come in our device..

any angel will come from XDA & TADAA..we will get JB..:laugh:
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] mj.vikram:
Our Device is having Nvidia Tegra 2, Nvidia is very slow in providing the required drivers so i don't think we will be getting official ROM based on Android 4.1 because we will be getting official ROM by end of next month :fingers-crossed:...

But who know Samsung may provide us 4.1 directly :D......
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] CallMeVentus:
Google is just progressing too hastily

This was sent from a Galaxy Ace.
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] xlm13x:
guys sammy is not even providing ICS to us than thinking that they will provide 4.1 update is just day dreaming :D, we should rely on devs not samsung.
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] mj.vikram:
yes you are correct at least they should give one year gap between each major update in the mean time they should only release bug fix's.....
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] xlm13x:
buddy can u tell how u used HTML in ur sig :D
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] vipul12389mehta:
Samsung is giving us ICS, thats more than enuf for dem....

It means that samsung has done their job, they have followed all d norms (like google says to update each fone once in a life tyme). N providing JB to R is more than a favour..And sammy wont make any extra favour specially to R.

It can offer such favour only to s2 s3 and Note etc..

so rely only on dev:D:D:D:D
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] D™:
Yes dear, they are doing like a formality & due to norms of Google..but what if any phone is getting many updates like S2 & S3(may b get JB)..??
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] vipul12389mehta:
Yes s2 and s3 do deserve...coz

1. They were/are flagship product

2. Millions of user, larger user base.

3. tons of business due to these product.

4. People have paid more that 30k

5. Plus not from a company point of view, but they have greater dev support (its all interlinked... flagship == larger support)

Wat else do you want ?? :(:(:(

Does R stand anywhere there ??

:silly::silly::silly::silly:

More Over remember one thing....once s2 is updated to JB, then samsung wont even consider s2..

I mean SGS2 would be treated d same way as SGS was treated by not updating to ICS.

Samsung is money minded and doesn't care about its customer. s2 will get updates till s3 doesnt takes off pretty well in all countries and carrier and den tata bye bye s2..!!
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] CallMeVentus:
I'm not , only Admins can use HTML

This was sent from a Galaxy Ace.
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] chandrus1983:
lets wait and see ;)
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] xlm13x:
than how u created those buttons in ur sig :confused:
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] CallMeVentus:
Using the

tag

This was sent from a Galaxy Ace.
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] D™:
If you are considering the user base, then mst have considered the comsumption of mobile phone after making mobile product. Like they made SGR & then all phone were sold & now not making any new one.. also if we paid 25K bugs, then can pay more 5k to buy the SG2 & other one (who are getting ICS & JB now). but due to reliability over Samsung, SGR is not getting any update yet. but yes, you can say, SG2 & other major mobiles have Dev support then SGR.

Every comapny (except SONY), is playing money minded game with each mobile user..so its a fact that "we salute to rising stars".
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] chandrus1983:
who or what is Epsylon ???
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] 'cooleagle':
Common man in which world do you live?

I think you mean this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epsilon

Right ? :D :p
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] chandrus1983:
Ehhh, i am newbie here, i dont know what that mean, i read, it DEPENDS ON EPSYLON, so i asked what/who it is !!
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] mj.vikram:
Epsylon is CM developer, go through the below link for more details ..

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1693312
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] D™:
its ok dear, sometime we dont know what & who are the name specified..chill man & have a look over mj.vikram link provided..:laugh:
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] 'cooleagle':
Was just kidding buddy, the CM donation thread has always been there in the top ten posts for the past few days & you should have come across it for sure but maybe you didn't go through it in the whole.

CM development is important for our device & you should try to keep a track of the developments on that front.

Cheers ! :)
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] chandrus1983:
i didnt read that thread, i am very very very new to android, i came to know what is CM, today :D
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] AlexeyKiev:
JB for Jetstream

Dear Team,

what do you think about the idea to port Jelly Beam for HTC Jetstream. As you know HTC does not support Flyer and Jetsteram. At the moment there is no Roms Android 4 available for Jetstream.

AlexeyKiev
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] D™:
Wrong section buddy. you need to contact Devs of HTC Jetsream.
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] AlexeyKiev:
Ask for Jelly Beam For HTC Jetstream

Sorry for spuming.

I'm a new member here. Thanks.
[Galaxy S III Themes and Apps] curse76:
Hello, can anyone please post a non-rooted stock email app from the Galaxy Nexus that will work with the Galaxy S3 thanks.
[Galaxy S III Themes and Apps] danarama:
For teh stock email app to work on our phone, you have to rename the apk to SecEmail.apk (the same as the samsung one) and remove the existing SecEmail.apk and SecEmail.odex.

You are better off using one from a custom Nexus ROM that is de-odexed.

You will have to be rooted though.
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ztotherad:
as long as I can get it ported/built I'm planning on bringing over an odexed ROM. I'm not sure which one yet, but I just wanted feedback.

Thanks!
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Cookiemonster21:
I've never fully understood odexing. What are some of the benefits?
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ztotherad:
actually, from what i understand its definitely faster, it doesnt have a long boot up time

i got the idea from the captivate forums where they have an aokp rom thats been reodexed
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] notta:
I've heard the same & I would sport it! :cool:
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ztotherad:
sir, you fershur rock! I'm working on it now, actually. I just gotta do some things first, haha. Especially since the odexer script is being ridiculous atm.
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ztotherad:
What is a odexed and a deodexed rom?

When you look at a stock rom in the folder /system/app, you will see files with the ending .odex and the apks doesn't contains classes.dex files. When you look at a deodexed rom, you'll see that there are no .odex files and the apks contains classes.dex files. Basically every apk contains a classes.dex files. Then the dalvik virtual machine generates a dalvik cache based of the classes.dex file. When you load a app, it will be loaded from the the dalvik cache, not from the apk. Samsung built the odexed rom using a tool called dexopt-wrapper. This tool generates .odex files based from the classes.dex, that means it does the same job like the dalvik vm. The .odex files were pushed in the /system. The files are the replacement for the dalvik cache. Like I wrote above, apps are loading from the dalvik cache, not from apk or classes.dex file, so classes.dex are not needed anymore, so they are deleted in odexed roms. Deodexing using xUltimate means regenerating a classes.dex based from the .odex file, merging it into the apk and deleting .odex.

What are the advantages and disadvantages from a deodexed rom?

Advantages:

-All needed things are in one apk, so modding/theming is (better) possible

-Needs less space on /system

Disavantages:

-Needs more space on /data

-Is not so stable than a odexed rom

-Slower on first boot(because a odexed rom has already execute ready .odex files, a deodexed rom needs to generate dalvik cache)

taken from http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1500475
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Cookiemonster21:
Id be interested in the THS builds being deodexed.
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ztotherad:
you mean re-odexed?
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vrahn:
My phone currently rocks solid good sir. Unless u can get better than the below pic then I'm staying. Although I appreciate the work your putting: into this ;)
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ztotherad:
hmm, idk i may be able too, plus odexed is totally different than deodexed and ive heard good things about odexed
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] wd5gnr:
Amazing

www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/27/us-samsung-galaxy-ruling-idUSBRE85Q02B20120627
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] Ryanscool:
If this includes the tab 2 then ill be mad. But I thought they partially made the tab 2 so it doesn't infringe. Goshdang every major company should sue them .
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] wd5gnr:
Ah good point. But the 10.1 is pretty much off the shelves now except for a few "closeouts" so if that's true that it isn't the Tab 2 then this would be almost meaningless.

I guess makers of flat rectangular picture frames better beware, they are next.
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] Archer:
I pity the book stores who are obviously next, with their rectangular shaped objects that display glyphs that are scanned with the human eye and translated into words in the brain. God forbid they put pictures on the cover as that's clearly infringing on the photo gallery app patent!
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] SirRhor:
I never curse, but... F.*.*.K. Apple.

This culture of elimination is getting ridiculous.

Sent from a GNote, hell yeah!
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] kuronosan:
It's because we allow stupid laws to exist that are designed to protect the little guys and only serve the big fish that things like this happen. In the old days, companies had to innovate to compete for business. Now it's all about how much of your competition you can eliminate so that people are forced to buy your ****ty products.
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] MultipleMonomials:
I hope it's not the tab 2 or the GT-p5113 will become an endangered species! Good luck getting devs to make p5113 ROM's when there's only a few of us out here! If it's possible, I hate Apple even more!
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] miketoasty:
I believe this was just for the original Tab, which did look a lot like an iPad. I think both Tab2 devices are a ok!
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] AndroidBaum:
Apple Injunction

Forget the Apple injunction on quick search box for Samsung Nexus and Galaxy S III. This new app on GooglePlay does most of what was removed because of the injunction: Veveo vtap QuickSearch
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] poulsen93:
It's not just Apple that's the problem here, every big electronics company is suing each other over SH*T, and in Apples case, it's only about halting sales of the competitions products, it's F*CKED!
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] Sean_Seany:
I find it amazing that Apple and Samsung work closely but at the same time they fight like cat and dog. Sure ,you have to protect your product without exception but this just gets sillier and sillier with each court case.

LINK

Dont know how anyone could mistake an Apple/iOS product for a Samsung/Android device. Lets not forget that Apple didnt invent the tablet , That was Microsoft that did that :) Pity they just lost in Germany - Apple Loses Bid to Ban Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1N in Germany

Good for the lulz but bad for the consumer.
[Galaxy Tab 2 General] lancelot2002:
It is fair, Microsoft stolen Apple OS in the earlier time also. But, I read somewhere saying that the window and mouse concept doesn't come from either of the companies, it is from Xerox.
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] NESECITOTUAYUDA:
So i got my new EVO LTE June 3 . Every thing seemed to be going smooth until i started to notice like a red flashing square everytime a page was loading in cluding pictures,music,and videos.Next when im on a call and take the phone away from my face the screen wont turn on it stays black! And now im noticing that the camera doesn't focus to well! Any suggestions on what to do thanks.
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] P.Mobile:
do u have a screen protector on it?? cause i saw that for some people it was the screen protector messing with the sensor..
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] medina90:
If I were you I'll just take it back where ever you got it from and get a new 1
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] s0calstate0fmind:
Well, for the red square flashing....that's a setting in developer options. Make sure "strict mode enabled" is unchecked. And as far as the screen not turning back on after a call or during.....like the other guy said, do u have a screen cover?? That could be a cause.

Troubleshoot your problems before you prematurely freak out and return this awesome phone.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] WiK1d:
I've seem to develop a slight problem with my P7500.

First I started with the guide to root by djR3Z, which was the wrong method and I ended up with the rolling recovery screen. Then I followed the guide by isimobile to fix that. Then I followed the guide by this_is_nick6 to root the tablet.

Everything is hunky dory, the tablet rebooted and was working perfectly. Then the screen went to sleep, and when woke it up, chaos. The screen is tearing horisontally, not rolling like the recovery thing.

Any ideas on what I should do? Flash a new ROM? Revert to the completely stock ROM?

Thanks!
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] WiK1d:
Fixed thanks to this guide
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] PrinceFX:
I just unlocked my phone using a code provided by t-mobile. I made a logcat (with -v long) while I did the whole process. Will it help the devs figure out a way to develop a method to generate/calculate unlock codes for the T989?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sohebq:
Sometimes over efficiency kills you instantly and this is what happened to me. I moved to "apex launcher" and disabled touchwiz to get more free space in ram. Today, I wanted to update apex and it failed. I then thought to remove the previous version so I can install new one separately. I went into apps and removed apex. Bang, I was standing no where, i had noting to launch. I restarted phone but it stuck on boot logo. I went to recovery and reflashed the rom (wanamlite) without wipe. Phone rebotted, app upgrading appears, but it stuck at starting app.

Now how can I restore my phone without wipping. I don't have any nandroid backup.. Thanks for help.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] watsa:
try and create a CWM flashable zip with any launcher apk included (say Apex), and flash using CWM? I think you should be able to mount sd card from CWM
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] norpan111:
Or just push a launcher apk in system/app from computer.. A cwm with file manager was on front page of xda some week ago.. Would be perfect for you
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sohebq:
Can you send me a link of flashable launcher?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] watsa:
Follow this: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=24642154&postcount=3

Edit: haven't tested it myself but it should work
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sohebq:
Thanks. I am in office right now and I have limited options. I can't connect my phone to PC. If i can find a flashable launcher, I can download that from another phone and use it through external sd card.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sohebq:
found it myself. Thanks for help
[Galaxy S III Q&A, (US Carriers)] caveman999:
I recently made a homemade USB battery charger by daisy chaining four D batteries and connecting the positive and negative ends of a USB cord to the correct ends of the connected batteries. The battery works fine; I have tested it on cheap USB powered devices, however, I am wondering if I can use this with my phone as a backup just in case I need to get some more juice out of my phone.

Assuming all the batteries give out the rated voltage, this should produce about 6 volts, with an amperage that I am unaware of. Though this is higher than the 5.2V that the phone normally charges with, it is less that what is produced by a 3rd party AC to DC adapter that I got off of eBay but more than what I get off of the Samsung adapter. I don't have a volt meter, so I wasn't able to get absolute measurements of the voltages; however, I was able to get relative measurements.

Does anyone know if this will cause any adverse effects if I decide to use it?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, (US Carriers)] gtuansdiamm:
Maybe you should use the thing a bit else where and have the voltage reduced and try it on your phone
[Galaxy S III Q&A, (US Carriers)] caveman999:
I've used it multiple times to charge another backup battery and haven't had any problems with it yet. Do you know what would happen if the amperage of the battery is too high or too low? Currently I have no way of measuring how it compares to the original adapter.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, (US Carriers)] stevesprivateaccount:
Bring it into a radio shack and have them connect it to a multimeter, you'll know exactly what power output you are looking at.

I however, wouldn't connect a homemade battery based charger to my several hundred $ phone, just saying.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, (US Carriers)] GuestK00145:
If your phone does meet it's demise because of your charger, don't blame samsung..... i know one guy who did
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] naja_return:
I have problem here. Today my ST18a got soaked by the rain. At first I can power on it. but after i dry it with handdryer. It boot up but I got boot loop. It'll boot to CWM endlessly. I've try factory reset via CWM but that doesn't work

Modification I've done to my xperia ray ,stock ICS 4.0.3

1. bootloader unlocked

2. rooted (+other stuffs like supercharger )

3. flashed kernel XRay V7.3.431 (Sirkay)

Sorry for creating this stupid thread but I have no idea where should I post coz problem not causing from modification (i guess)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] avin4:
sorry mate but I think u just missed the best chance to cure ur ray from water splash. U should take off the battery after the accident asap ,if the water is not clean, go for some service guys to use industrial alcohol as detergent and have a bath(yeah, bath ur ray).

U should NEVER power it up before the cleaning sequence, otherwise... bootloop or even totally bricked.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] nh1402:
I agree with the other guy, never turn on phone after it gets wet, but try flashing Stock Rom, via Flashmode, if it loads into recovery then maybe it could load up, but I suppose they call it recovery for a reason.