yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II General] rakeshishere:
I'm sure there are a lot who really care. No offense to devs who work hard in development of CM but bugs like RIL crash, low Audio volume, Slow USB transfer speed in mass storage mode etc doesn't make it usable.

Mind you I haven't started talking about missing features like TV out, FM radio, Broken h/w composer. I know there might be workarounds or fixes coming to all these issues which I have listed but people want a stable and as much bug free rom as possible. This is only possible in stock Samsung rom and thanks to Samsung been not so open about their Exynos devices making devs life hard and miserable, it'll take a long time for users to start fully relying on custom roms on I9100.
[Galaxy S II General] :
Very well spoken,

Sent From My ©Galaxy
[Galaxy S II General] drraptor:
Pop up pay is already available if you use BSplayer
[Galaxy S II General] jj03:
There were already alternatives on the market way before pop up play appeared on the s3. Its no biggie.

Bucket Biff
[Galaxy S II General] VanillaCracker:
Everyone knows that people don't know or care until it becomes associated with something official. You see what happened with panorama with iOS6? Our phones came with panorama back in Oct. 2011, and now, Oct. 2012 people are like omg you see this new panorama thing?

Pshhh, iPhone faggies
[Galaxy S II General] redrumsilence:
Though I agree that most of what you say is true, I disagree with your final statement

I bought my i9100 just over 7 months ago, I didn't buy it for software, the TW UI, I bought purely cause it felt nice in my hand and the hardware was the best for the money in my pocket.

Within 3 days, I had it rooted, overclocked, and a custom kernel.

2 days later I was running CM7.

3 weeks went by, and I stumbled upon the Resurrection Remix AOKP thread here on XDA.

From there, I was hooked on AOKP, and I still am. Despite the various issues with custom, ported, tweaked and source-built ROMs, the overall experience usually far outstrips the efforts put in by the manufacturer.

I have no doubt that Samsung has spent millions over the last several years refining and touching up what has now become the TouchWiz Nature UX; but in my own opinion, as a user, I find the "vanilla" experience a lot more pleasing.

As for issues such as RIL crashes, low audio, USB transfer and no FM radio: there are ways around them.

RIL crashes and low audio have been fixed for me by using the Dorimanx or Siyah kernels. I don't use USB transfer, I haven't for a long time, I either email the file to myself or use cloud storage, and no FM doesn't bother me, I bought TuneIn Pro when it was in one the 25p sales :)

I have happily relied on these so-called unstable (not by you necessarily) for over 6 months (this isn't including the ROMs I had on my older Android handsets) without issue, most of the issues I've encountered have been entirely my fault.

Custom ROMs aren't for everyone, I can certainly see why they wouldn't be for a "normal user", I for one can't understand why my own mother won't root her GNote to flash a new modem, her signal is horrendous, and she know how to do it...still, I digress.

I am, it would seem, a member of the Great Half And Half, I am of the half that prefers the experience Google crafted over the abberation (my own opinion) the manufacturers choose to theme our devices with.

Without offending anyone I hope, I bow out with my piece said, thank you
[Galaxy S II General] andro6600:
Google UI is more polished, more stylish, better visual effects, with better consistence of elements all over. That's why, many people fall in love with CM/AOSP/AOKP roms. BUT... Samsung apps are far more powerful and handy then google ones! And i don't want any missing functionality of my device, no matter if i use it or not. Just got the feeling, for some infinished product. Now i'm on Chameleon ROM, and must say - this is the way it should be - Samsung base with Google framework. Beautifull! But if we get the Touchwiz UX, then i'll be happy. I kind of like the new UI.
[Galaxy S II General] POLO_i780:
I just cant wait to see THAT tweet, like the one when they released ICS, i was on my way to uni, whilest stuck in traffic i pullf out my S2 , looked at twitter and the 1st Tweet is Samsung's announcement of the official roll-out of ICS.

Cant wait to see that for JB, lol.

Im just glad we arent being screwed over like the Sony fans, c'mon November!! :D
[Galaxy S II General] :
We gotta take it easy with Samsung, Xperia T won't get JB til 1st quarter lol. and its brand new and all xperias lol.. HTC+wtf
[Galaxy S II General] Osyx:
Would you mind sharing a link to Chameleon? :) -.- Tapatalk search sucks :P

----------------------------------------------------------

Phone details:​

Phone: Samsung Galaxy SII

Android version: 4.1.2

Android ROM:ParanoidAndroid 2.x+ [JB]

Kernel version: Dorimanx Kernel

Recovery: CWMR Touch v6.0.1.2
[Galaxy S II General] Krishnadusad:
here

Signature

ROM 1: RootBox latest nightly

ROM 2: Wanamlite 12.6

Kernel : Siyah 5.0alpha 1

Root app :SuperSU
[Galaxy S II General] Codrea:
hello it's getting me old waiting for this and sammy source code. whatever which one just release one of this ASAP.

f*ck samsul
[Galaxy S II General] toi1em:
In my country firmware version still 4.03. Hope 4.1 coming soon.
[Galaxy S II General] andro6600:
Sorry for delay mate, but i see you got the link already! :) Personaly, i am useing v1.3 of Chameleon, until the v2 bugs are sorted out, at least chameleon ones, then i'll jump onboard, until JB! :)
[Galaxy S II General] naluca:
.

Why wait for Sam when AOKP build 5 is knocking on the door.;)
[Galaxy S II General] yaatzek:
I don't think it will solve common jb problems.
[Galaxy S II General] ant987:
I bet that some JB builds already exist! It's obvious, if there already is a leaked for the Sprint US Galaxy S2, there should be a build for our international version, as this model has always been taken into consideration before the other variants, however I don't understand why they don't leak it!
[Galaxy S II General] Osyx:
People at the Samsung head quarters have already jb on their sgs2:)

----------------------------------------------------------

Phone details:​

Phone: Samsung Galaxy SII

Android version: 4.1.2

Android ROM:ParanoidAndroid 2.x+ [JB]

Kernel version: Dorimanx Kernel

Recovery: CWMR Touch v6.0.1.2
[Galaxy S II General] :
it would be stupid if they didn't had an SGS II to develop on, (well they can have a note instead of S II) but then still they don't know if an app would work very well on an SGS II if it worked perfect on a Note.

and why there is no leak is a good question, even if Spring got a leak, doesn't change the fact that maybe no one outside of samsung got a chance to get an S II rom. as when a spring leak is out it have been on Sprint developer so the developers of spring apps can make a re branded or a better performing app on jelly bean.

If the Jelly Bean rom would hit the Spring Developers when the original SGS II have gotten their Jelly Bean update the spring users have to wait at least 2-6 months to get a new update. and thats not what samsung wants they want users to get it almost at the same time, then its the carriers decision if they wan't to release it on time or later. if they don't release it the day they probably haven't getting everything sorted out

After months of speculation, Exynos will go open source!! | SamMobile

Source

http://www.sammobile.com/2012/10/21...nos-will-go-open-source/#.UIRNmGlUJEg.twitter
[Galaxy S II General] olyloh6696:
Anyone got any evidence we are getting TW5? Which version does the Sprint S2 leak have?

If so, hats off to Samsung, very pleased they are updating the UI. HTC are selfish b**tards and didn't give the Sensation Sense 4.0 which is understandable, but they aren't even updating it to JB.
[Galaxy S II General] msquared:
Wrong post...

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] Spiralzz:
The Epic 4G Touch pictures showed that it had the new TouchWiz in the leak... but we'll know when it is time to know.
[Galaxy S II General] olyloh6696:
Yeah thanks, just saw a YouTube video of it, and it looks impressive :)
[Galaxy S II General] jaykresge:
http://www.latinospost.com/articles/5824/20121021/android-4-1-jelly-bean-update-sweden.htm

Confirmation from Samsung Sweden. SGS2 JB in November.
[Galaxy S II General] DanDroidian:
Finally! A real update on something! Thx!
[Galaxy S II General] DrunkFuX666:
The unfortunate truth about what really happened with Samsung... We may not be getting all the code we need... Details by xplodwild in the post...

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=33092439&postcount=10618

Sent from my Galaxy JBSII
[Galaxy S II General] atulalvenkar:
That's not codeworkx, that's xplodwild another hacksung member.

There is post by Entropy512 who was there at the conference about what actually happened.

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=33096323&postcount=10634
[Galaxy S II General] DrunkFuX666:
Sorry I meant xplodwild... All these peeps get mixed up :p

Sent from my Galaxy JBSII
[Galaxy S II General] duykhang524:
I just asked in the Epic 4G thread and it seems that we get all the motion features from de S3 like swipe screen with palm to screenshot etc. :D not sure for shareshot in the camera since we also have wifi direct. Those features are not working yet but it's cool to know they're there. Sammy ftw! :D
[Galaxy S II General] rakeshishere:
Awesome :thumbup:

Apart from JB, the SGS3 Touchwiz features and Gesture options from S3 on S2 would be great.

I heard multi window feature is coming for S3 ( i think it's already there in firmware for korean S3) and wish it gets ported to S2. It would be a handy little function and make multi tasking even better.

Definitely get S4 once it comes next year if they make me happy
[Galaxy S II General] HJ nan:
could someone explain to a simpleton like me why is it so important to have the exynos source code??? also how is it possible for a processor to have source code?

is there a rom out there offering the full jelly bean project butter experience? what's the deal with the hw composer thingy?

will an official rom solve those issues
[Galaxy S II General] :
its the drivers for the processor that is needed and we don't had them before as samsung didn't let anyone get access to it
[Galaxy S II General] Zaldi00:
:mad::mad::mad::mad:

VAMOSSSS, HAY QUE METER PRESIÓN!!! http://www.htcmania.com/showthread.php?p=6014209
[Galaxy S II General] Spiralzz:
There is no AOSP ROM offering fully implemented project butter (half working is already there, and its better than ICS). An official ROM won't solve project butter problems on AOSP since even the S3 has problems with project butter even though the official firmware has been released. In short, exynos devices won't have the same JB experience as the nexus does (or omap phones like the GT-I9100G).. Please correct me if I'm wrong :)
[Galaxy S II General] ant987:
Why are there leaks or hints for every Samsung smartphone except ours???????????????

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] stormtroopercs:
Make everyone else happy so that when we get the update to 4.1.1 they know they are gonna get it. :)
[Galaxy S II General] l_ryuzaki:
3M pixel camera in aokp??

I have been facing camera problem in aokp based JB ROM's....in RootBox and default AOKP Rom's my camera showing only 3M pixel option...does anybody else also facing same problem?? or is der ny workaround for this?? I tried flashing ROM repeatedly will full wipe also tried different kernels... now on dorimanx 7.4 but problem isn't goin away.....I was just wondering why AOKP building such camera app which s not utilizing full hardware...plz tell me if nybody knws solution to this....thanks in advance
[Galaxy S II General] Osyx:
Wrong thread, this post should be in the RootBox thread, not here.

RootBox: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1806401

----------------------------------------------------------

Phone details:​

Phone: Samsung Galaxy SII

Android version: 4.1.2

Android ROM:ParanoidAndroid 2.x+ [JB]

Kernel version: Dorimanx Kernel

Recovery: CWMR Touch v6.0.1.2
[Galaxy S II General] Vazduh:
Anyway. I think your problems is with gapps. Try relflash your gapps with latest official ones and wipe cash/ dalvik/ fix permissions. Hope it helped.
[Galaxy S II General] :
theres no leak for N7000 Note, take a look by yourself thats a picture of a note running JB, besides if there was a leak we would be stupid to not use it as test instead of 4G sprint version, as this is only a bigger screen on the note, but 4G Sprint have different WIFI drivers, and 4G that is useless in our SII menu. about hardware i don't know if its same, looking on GSMarena they say that we got A9 but sprint version have only Cortex, maybe this can be a reason why It wasn't butter smooth, i can't say as i am not an expert in GPU/CPU sides on phones.

CPU	Dual-core 1.2 GHz	Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A9

GPU	Mali-400MP	Mali-400MP
[Galaxy S II General] rakeshishere:
That half working sprint port of yours was good job done. Some thing better than nothing :D

I guess if Note 1 JB port leaks, probably you can port it? Please correct me if I'm wrong but are you same guy who got first JB port for I9100 using galaxy nexus stock rom?
[Galaxy S II General] jaykresge:
So, if the GT-i9100 is supposed to get JB in November, that means December for unlocked UK users, thanks to that stupid deal Samsung has in place with UK carriers not allowing unlocked handsets to get updates first. Happened to us with ICS and is currently happening to SGS3 users with JB.

Even when I buy an unlocked handset I still can't escape the damned carriers. If only Google was aware that storage existed in sizes greater than 16GB...I'd get a Nexus.
[Galaxy S II General] j510:
there was a note jb build earlier in this thread. Rom wasnt leaked though.
[Galaxy S II General] DanDroidian:
I'll buy a Nexus when they start coming with 128GB storage. At least 64GB. Come on.
[Galaxy S II General] Depleta:
I don't mind if they don't release an official JB, just wish they just help release the sources for drivers for their hardware. I use Custom roms anyways :P
[Galaxy S II General] jaykresge:
Then 16/32 with expansion is your best bet, and for some reason Google is against that. I suspect it's a combination of wanting you to subscribe to their cloud services (money) and primarily making a baseline device for developers without competing too much with the OEMs.
[Galaxy S II General] Codrea:
Fuuuuu samsul really make me crazy.. If the exynos code doesn't release than even the official firmware jas been released developers in xda can't make jelly bean rom with perfect project butter.. Faaak samsul, next time will always buy nexus phonee
[Galaxy S II General] duykhang524:
LOL samsul hahahha
[Galaxy S II General] l_ryuzaki:
ya I knew abt that thread but its a development thread n supposedly newbie like me cant reply in development thread unless he has atleast 10 posts...srry for that but I thought in general discussion thread like this I ll get my answer...which I got :D.....

Thanks a lot...reflashing official gapps worked for me...actually I was using inverted gapp's n everytym after flashing ROM I was flashing same gapp's immediately so couldn't really figure out problem....
[Galaxy S II General] ant987:
Yeah yeah I know there is no leak for the Note, but at least they have this screenshot that proves Samsung is working on it! On the other side the Sprint US users already have a leak! We are the only ones that only have a date :rolleyes:

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] drraptor:
Samsung hasn't posted its a Date... (dating)
[Galaxy S II General] :
First the sprint isn't a port. Its the leaked version from sprint which is untouched. Second i didn't made that port to boot on that jelly bean port. rest was team work and play around. However we got gsm/data to work. And i want it to work on this sprint version as it will be a daily use from my side yet i will need a flashable zip and root on it. The root part is easier but its the zip creation i suck on :D

But yes i was a part of that porting team which was fun playaround.

The only thing is this sprint version is CDMA and we use GSM, i seen more skilled porters having great problem with this :mad:

Sent From My ©Galaxy S4 GT-I9400

---------- Post added at 09:17 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:08 AM ----------

November is a date between 1-30 is a date lol. At least it's soon :p

What do you mean, don't you like that half baked sprint port with no wifi and no gsm/data/network ,

Sent From My ©Galaxy S4 GT-I9400
[Galaxy S II General] Livebyte:
Probably November 30th 23:59:59 as promised. HAHAHA. :laugh:
[Galaxy S II General] iamnotkurtcobain:
Strange that there are no JB Rom leaks.. Ics had so so many.. But I guess we get the look of the S3 and no butter.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] j510:
You mean and butter. Samsung will use full exynos on stock jb, unless theyre not releasing source to their own workers. Lol. Report from a sprint sgs2 user saying There is pop up play feature. Also heres a link showing off the sprint epic touch 4g leak.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28CKUEMhClI&feature=youtube_gdata_player
[Galaxy S II General] iamnotkurtcobain:
A dev said it has no vsync. No vsync=no butter.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] rakeshishere:
It's a test or a Alpha build which means features are yet to be implemented. This doesn't mean it's going to be same in final release as well.

B/w If a alpha build leaks in October, I don't see how you can have have final or stable one in November. I'm thinking it'll get released sometime only in December
[Galaxy S II General] Vazduh:
Yeah. I think Santa will bring us a full box of jelly beans:silly:
[Galaxy S II General] infatality:
Jelly bean will arrive in Q4 for both SGN 1, SGS 2

http://www.androidpit.com/jelly-update-bean-android
[Galaxy S II General] :
I thought galaxy s3 had butter in their phones or prove me wrong, and yes i felt that the sprint version didn't had any butter :D

Sent From My ©Galaxy S4 GT-I9400

---------- Post added at 03:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:54 PM ----------

Yes November is in Q4 :D

Sent From My ©Galaxy S4 GT-I9400 http://img840.imageshack.us/img840/5849/nihonnofanboi.png
[Galaxy S II General] olyloh6696:
Just asked the official Samsung store in Westfield.

They said there are definitely plans for the S2 JB. But he isn't too sure of TW5 coming with it. He did the Note 1 didn't get it, so we are unlikely too. Probably only a few features like pop up play etc.

However, he isn't too sure and the leaks from the Sprint S2 show us TW5. I hope we do get it.
[Galaxy S II General] robertogl:
Note1 did get tw5 with Android 4.0.4....

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] ant987:
S3 probably has project butter enabled caused I've tried a Jelly Bean ROM and is fu**ing smooth, incredible!

How does it feel the Sprint version? Is it smoother than ICS? I think that we'll get Project Butter! Otherwise I don't see the reason to update us to JB, but without providing Project Butter!! If they only want to give us TW5, they could just have released an ICS update! If they are working on a Jelly Bean update, it means we'lle get all the goodies from Jelly Bean, including project butter! The Sprint version is an alpha release, what do you guys expect? It doesn't even have a lockscreen, it doesn't have 3G, there are a lot of bugs, so I think it is possible the full Project Butter hasn't been implemented yet! Moreover, the build was for the Epic 4G, and we all know that updates come first for the international version! So as the build is not so recent, maybe in the meanwhile Samsung has managed to build a build (sorry 4 the repetition) with everything working! Or at least I hope so, if they want to match the November release :laugh:
[Galaxy S II General] :
definitely not smoother than ICS :cowboy: and no i noticed there wasn't a lock screen, haha.

but i really liked that we may get ripple look as in SGS III thats just makes me smile. :victory:

Note that i wrote may with a bold style, as its in the sprint leak version but however i don't know what samsung will come up with next
[Galaxy S II General] ant987:
I definetely think we're getting ripple lock, that's probably the reason why there's still no lockscreen in the ROM.

As far as smoothness is concerned, I'm reading very positive comments on the Epic 4g thread like:
[Galaxy S II General] :
i believe it can be due to we got A9 and they didn't i honestly don't know :)
[Galaxy S II General] l_ryuzaki:
I just read that google s goin 2 launch android 4.1.2 on oct 29....here handset supplier like samsung r not able to implement 4.1.1 on premier phone of last yr like s2 how can we expect 4.1.2...
[Galaxy S II General] Testraindrop:
We already have 4.1.2... :rolleyes:

Google is launching 4.2
[Galaxy S II General] #illidan:
It should be 4.2 & you shouldn't be expecting anything more than JB from Samsung because as far as their concerned the product life cycle of the S2 is done.
[Galaxy S II General] :
:crying: lol off to S3 then i guess, haha
[Galaxy S II General] Freedomalfa:
http://www.sammobile.com/2012/10/23/leaked-android-4-1-1-jelly-bean-dump-for-the-galaxy-note/

maybe soon will have a s2 leak
[Galaxy S II General] stormtroopercs:
I think devs can use that since hardware is similar!
[Galaxy S II General] iamnotkurtcobain:
Note is a bigger S2

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] drraptor:
http://www.sammobile.com/2012/10/19...y-s-ii-november-galaxy-note-and-note-10-1-q4/

So it was indeed right. Q4 is very vague term. So will Note get JB before Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II General] Rick Roll:
hwc from note's JB leak
[Galaxy S II General] :
we can merge the files from the Sprint release (the apps will almost be optimized except call screen) and edit the build.prop then we should have a working SII leak haha

i'm willing to flash this for you guys :)

hmm, the leak has damaged settings, gmail some other apps

So far very stable apart from the lack of settings due to some corrupt apk.

If we have them, we might a very stable JB rom.

GT-N7000 (Butter)
[Galaxy S II General] sahibunlimited:
Epic touch 4G's processor is same as S2(only difference in ET4G is the 4 touch buttons as far as i remember)
[Galaxy S II General] :
i only said this:

CPU	Dual-core 1.2 GHz	Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A9

that we have A9 and 4G does not, this doesn't mean nothing or it can mean that there is a quite small change, or A9 is newer and improved. can't tell

the wifi modules got to be different as wifi didn't work on my phone and it did so on 4G Sprint, :)
[Galaxy S II General] sahibunlimited:
Cortex A9 is the architecture of the cpu which is the same
[Galaxy S II General] :
thats od, really od, well then the butter was bricked in 4G release lol

oh yes, i managed to get root :)

but that doesn't change the fact that its better Here we go,
[Galaxy S II General] martintspedersen:
awesome.. just fix the last apk and make a zip for us all lol;)
[Galaxy S II General] :
what last apk :confused: i can't make a stupid flashable :silly: but wait for it ;)
[Galaxy S II General] rakeshishere:
Sees Note JB dump leak, In cat woman's voice - There is a storm coming :D
[Galaxy S II General] :
there is a zip uploading atm, where we hopefully get most of the things working, (maybe not GSM/DATA/ as we use different modem, but wifi etc should work,

and butter!
[Galaxy S II General] stormtroopercs:
link? also cant we just use ril from 4.0.4?
[Galaxy S II General] :
i don't remember what ril we changed so i don't know but we better go with Note leak, as it seems more stable
[Galaxy S II General] rakeshishere:
I saw experimental build of CM10 for Note 1 with working project butter but unfortunately memory leak bug is back :mad:

This means we should be able to get things sorted out for I9100 as well. I want to flash like a mad man now :p
[Galaxy S II General] stormtroopercs:
does it include the new tw5?
[Galaxy S II General] stormtroopercs:
can you just give it to me already? lol ;)
[Galaxy S II General] :
well what was it in spring release :confused: