yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II General] crazy_4_and1:
That's a good one :) but I think I made a relation JB - ICS . No ICS for a device , no JB on it either . If you run ICS on your device you are probably gonna get JB . From Samsung or CM . . . but I think Samsung is gonna do the right thing here ( they maybe should have released ICS and Value pack for original SGS and leave the upgrade choice to the consumer , like S.E. ) .Time span "SGS2 - JB release date" is much shorter than "original SGS - ICS release date " - that should count for something .

---------- Post added at 12:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:20 PM ----------

SGS 1 on 2.3.6 - what can't you do with it , that you can with Nexus S i9020 on ICS ?

8xx MB of RAM and 1.2 dual-core ARM processor is enough to run JB : http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1751278 . I also think that AOKP is a better solution , at least eye-candy wise :) ;)
[Galaxy S II General] :
JB is running on galaxy s perfectly as we speak, so any of this "Our hardware is too old and too weak for jb" is just bull****.
[Galaxy S II General] kalgecin:
with the specs of the i9100................... we can actually run a full blown linux distro easily. So my guess is we can have several more upcoming android versions
[Galaxy S II General] funnix:
[ROM][PORT][ANDROID 4.1] TAJB: Jelly Bean port for Galaxy S [BETA]

Working:

-Touchscreen

-Call/SMS

-GPU

-Softkeys/Hardkeys

-Butter

-ADB

-USB

-Internal/External SD

-Camera

-Audio

-WiFi

-HW Video Acc

-Data 2G/3G

-Google Now

-GPS

Not working:

-mounting of external sd to pc

Any Questions?
[Galaxy S II General] kalgecin:
have i ever mentioned how much i hate proprietary stuff?
[Galaxy S II General] :
What does that mean? were you trying to prove my point?
[Galaxy S II General] funnix:
Even the Galaxy S People have an almost working build...
[Galaxy S II General] :
Whatever, its not a camera related thread about jelly bean keep calm , i going hunt Samsung if not get jelly bean
[Galaxy S II General] sahibunlimited:
Because nexus s is having just the same hardware.
[Galaxy S II General] funnix:
And what a devil's work hardware, we have that we're becoming no build?
[Galaxy S II General] lovesingh25:
we got exynos and yahama chips.....

No other phn has got such a combo :silly:
[Galaxy S II General] funnix:
But is ICS so different as JB? I mean they are both Android 4!
[Galaxy S II General] hypergamer1231:
Sometimes being outstanding can really mean you will stand out for a long time just like our 9100 is stuck.
[Galaxy S II General] lovesingh25:
yeah.. but I have read that their's difference in which it handles audio and ics driver of yahama chip is NOT compatible!!!!!!! with JB

so they need to rewrite HAL for it which is not possible now as there are lot of devices which can get JB without such pain....

I think i9100 has to a wait little longer till the time s3,i9100g get their share of attention :rolleyes:

---------- Post added at 05:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:45 PM ----------

very well explained!!!!!:cowboy:
[Galaxy S II General] brgroover:
Andrew Dodd ‏@Entropy512

@Slitexboi Working with codeworkx on trying to figure out audio on I777/I9100 first. If I9100/I777 get JB, N7000 will get it.
[Galaxy S II General] robertogl:
They mean i777 and i9100 or the i777 model of s2 only?

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] iamnotkurtcobain:
How do you know?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] anshmiester78900:
Can u give the tweet link ?
[Galaxy S II General] override182:
Those are all Yamaha based. Once it worked on either one of em, high chance same blob hack/mod can be applied to the similar to get audio working
[Galaxy S II General] anshmiester78900:
I think codwrokx dont want to post any update on S2 as people will again go crazy on it and many kids of 15 yrs will start asking ETA .!!
[Galaxy S II General] Scarface1991:
Looks like camera is working ;)

http://nechko.com/sites/cm10cl/index.php?device=galaxys2&translations=no
[Galaxy S II General] override182:
I had to agree on this. Even fluxi which was relatively if not super stable faces tons of complains and we dont want the situation of all mods becoming jail wardens again on CM thread
[Galaxy S II General] lovesingh25:
It's not specified which s2... but really hoping at least this is i9100....
[Galaxy S II General] edint3000:
From the owner of the site:

edint3000: Tell me that changes on your site is that really for galaxy s2, and is there working build yet for galaxy s2?

nechko: Ovo je changelog oficijelnih promjena na Cyanogenu 10...kad pocnu kompajlirati nightly-e ja cu ih poceti stavljati javno...mislim da ce se to desiti za jedno 2 sedmice mozda i manje...

translation: This is a changelog of official changes on Cyanogen 10, when they start compiling, I will publish theese builds... I think that will happen in about two weeks, maybe less...
[Galaxy S II General] lovesingh25:
At least one positive news....

---------- Post added at 07:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:46 PM ----------

Again which s2???? Can anybody confirm from them ???
[Galaxy S II General] edint3000:
I asked for i9100. So that should be it...
[Galaxy S II General] robertogl:
Yes, i think , if you look, other s2, like g variant have different pages :)

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] lovesingh25:
Ok thanx 4 info... but confirmed it because galaxy s2 i9100g is getting all the love and we don't have much on Jb for now... and suddenly this site showed some grt progress.... that seemed little weird..
[Galaxy S II General] Sun90:
the reason for all the love towards I9100g is its hardware seems more friendly for developers than the normal i9100 as said by codeworkxx
[Galaxy S II General] vic12340:
all the models have the same page

like this sensation

http://nechko.com/sites/cm10cl/index.php?device=pyramid&translations=no

so its say nothing
[Galaxy S II General] jonboyuk:
I used AOKP now, far better than stock, I totally agree!

All I was saying is that the SGS1 never got official 4.0 like you kind of implied/said lol! :)
[Galaxy S II General] neroleptic:
http://xdaforums.com/images/icons/icon12.gif

Wrong ==> http://nechko.com/sites/cm10cl/index.php?device=tenderloin&translations=no ;-)
[Galaxy S II General] anshmiester78900:
What are u trying to say that page is for S2 normal or Bothe normal and G version ?
[Galaxy S II General] neroleptic:
S2 page is for i9100. There is a page for each version.
[Galaxy S II General] lovesingh25:
so in short still there's confusion about weather those changelogs are for i9100g or i9100??

I had a feeling that they are for i9100g!!!
[Galaxy S II General] rajarshi10:
Its for I9100!!!!!! The G version has a different page altogether!!!!! Why don't u guys check the ENTIRE website before posting?
[Galaxy S II General] anshmiester78900:
Well thats a great news for us isnt it ?
[Galaxy S II General] vic12340:
You found a page of 1 device that have more progress than the others.

congrats!

ok keep believe that is a device specific changes.
[Galaxy S II General] lovesingh25:
thanx!!
[Galaxy S II General] rajarshi10:
Obviously it is.... only audio & wifi are the problems now I guess. I would be happy with audio. I don't really need wifi on an alpha build.
[Galaxy S II General] VanillaCracker:
So I'm expecting to be able to run a JB port on my I-777 in a few weeks right? :D
[Galaxy S II General] iamnotkurtcobain:
Missing wifi would be ok for the alpha. But sound is necessary for calls..

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] sahibunlimited:
Also when sound is working, we need working microphones...
[Galaxy S II General] iamnotkurtcobain:
I guess they're working already?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] rajarshi10:
WOW MAN... I know optimism is good, but please... not this much :D
[Galaxy S II General] anshmiester78900:
hahahahhaa :D
[Galaxy S II General] iamnotkurtcobain:
We only can wait and see... Codeworkx has a hard time with exynos...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] Blue Winter:
Hope Soon... :D
[Galaxy S II General] ant987:
Fortunately in a week time I will be flying to Spain for holidays and I won't be back till the end of August, and since there's no internet, I won't check everyday how the development is going! So I hope to find a surprise when I come back! Maybe :D :D

Inviato dal mio iPad con Tapatalk HD
[Galaxy S II General] anshmiester78900:
Hahaha yes it will be :D
[Galaxy S II General] Magmar100:
http://mygsmphones.blogspot.de/2012/07/samsung-s-galaxy-ii-soon-to-be-nightly.html

i really hope this is true :D !!!!

i hope he is not talking about I9100G, but i don´t know ^^
[Galaxy S II General] np231:
lol.. even the HTC HD2 has jelly bean now.. that's right a windows phone has Jelly Bean.. man I wish I kept my HD2..

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1773115
[Galaxy S II General] mynicksucks:
Pfft, your news is for the i9100G, so it is no news!
[Galaxy S II General] iamnotkurtcobain:
? It means that a rom for 9100G is out... we know that... but thanks!

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] Gorjess:
Well at least the S2 itself wasn't the last to have jelly bean, other device aren't so lucky either..

LOL, the HD2 is always be the most ridiculously open and versatile device ever :D

Swyped from my GT-i9100
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
Still mulling over the move to Gnex. I honestly dont know what to do!
[Galaxy S II General] rajarshi10:
Its a 7 month old device dude. Be happy for 7 more months on your S2 & then buy the new Nexus :good:
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
I have 12 months left on my Contract. So I could use the Gnex for 12 months and be happy with JB, and future updates straight away.

Hold out for 7 months, get less for my S2 than I can now , move onto the new Gnex device for 5 months (Have to fork out alot more to upgrade to the new devices than i would to upgrade to a Gnex now), before upgrading my contract.

Hold out 12 months on my S2, Hope that JB comes, And i get to use it on an S2 for say, 2-3 months tops before upgrading.

Like I say. Tricky!
[Galaxy S II General] iamanoopmk:
All this excitement... This is what I love about the community here.

Loving JB on my tab would love to see it on my sgs2 too..
[Galaxy S II General] droid_1989:
Why upgrade when the gnex isn't exactly lightyears ahead of the S2 is it?

The s2 is still a good phone, ill probably get the s3 in October, but only because I get a pay rise, if I wasn't getting a pay rise, then I would stick with my S2.

I could understand your logic fully if it was 4.0 vs 5.0 and the S2 didn't get 5.0.
[Galaxy S II General] :
Guys chill with buying the nexus, the new nexus phones will come out in november/december, then we can all finally say "fu and goodbye" to samsung and get some nice new google phone, but till then I'd say buying the galaxy nexus now is a waste of money (if anybody wants to swap theirs for my s2 I'll gladly accept ;) )
[Galaxy S II General] baza14:
codeworkx ‏@codeworkx

and the crying starts again... http://imgur.com/a/9tsJg#1 #i9100 #jellybean #cm10 #nosound
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
Just seen this. So we have a build that looks the same as what Koud managed to achieve
[Galaxy S II General] Scarface1991:
Jep, it seems there still isn`t any data connection and no Wifi on the SII as seen on the screenshot :(
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
No further on then. Same as what we already have.

Expect to see that tweet and image posted all over this Forum, New threads will be created and everything!

Its a joke!
[Galaxy S II General] Paradoxxx:
At least the development started, which is a good thing! Maybe he will be able to make things work by dirty hacks without proprietary blobs...

Gentlemen, take a sit, your popcorn, and stand still!:D

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9100 avec Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] anshmiester78900:
I think codewrkx and the team dont want to share much about the original S2 as people will again go crazy and cry . I remember when the alpha CM9 was released and a guy came and started bashing devs cuz he wasn't having a good battery life and i was like WTF !!!
[Galaxy S II General] *SanSiro*:
This time next year the SIII owners will have a similar thread on XDA

about Key Lime Pie....
[Galaxy S II General] anshmiester78900:
lol

---------- Post added at 11:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:30 PM ----------

True story mate .!
[Galaxy S II General] sahibunlimited:
Also no signal but its great we have a start:)
[Galaxy S II General] Magmar100:
:D lol. maybe you´re right

But that doesn´t interest me, cause then i will have a samsung nexus phone :P

But it´s a good feeling to know that the best developer in the world is working on a jelly bean port for my phone :D :D
[Galaxy S II General] sminky01:
I so want Key lime Pie on my SGS 2 with a dual booting kernel running Banoffee pie if thats what comes next and would settle for ICS on my Arnova 10g2 tab that would be nice:fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S II General] Magmar100:
But when you compare the jelly bean port of the i9100G and the i9100, you recognize that we have 130MB more Memory. Don´t know why??

I9100G http://i.imgur.com/wL60Ol.png 694MB

I9100 http://imgur.com/a/9tsJg#1 829MB

Is this normal???
[Galaxy S II General] *SanSiro*:
There will be five different Nexus devices by five different manufacturers namely

Samsung, HTC, Motorola, LG and Sony, so we will have a choice!

:D
[Galaxy S II General] koudd:
probably due to how the hardware is using the memory, maybe more is allocated for the gpu on I9100G. Yes this is normal
[Galaxy S II General] Testraindrop:
Source?
[Galaxy S II General] *SanSiro*:
Old news from "The Wall Street Journal",

I believe it was on the 15th of may.

---------- Post added at 08:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:41 PM ----------

Found the link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304371504577406511931421118.html
[Galaxy S II General] sahibunlimited:
Yes, because of the weaker GPU of i9100G
[Galaxy S II General] Testraindrop:
Ah yes that... but that never was confirmed, nor denied :(
[Galaxy S II General] *SanSiro*:
Think about it,

on the 5th of November this year it will be android's 5th anniversary

so it's most likely they will celebrate it with the release of five different Nexus devices.

anyway, don't exactly know when, but we will see five different Nexus devices!
[Galaxy S II General] VanillaCracker:
Anyone here know whether they have addresed ICS touch sensitivity? Or do ya think it's the same as ICS?
[Galaxy S II General] :
i believe you mean jb? and i think they done so , can't say
[Galaxy S II General] prbassplayer:
Lets keep comments none racist please and on topic.

Cheers
[Galaxy S II General] VanillaCracker:
Yes I meant in reference to JB. But it is ICS touch sensitivty that is the problem haha. I don't know if it's the same on JB so I didn't say JB touch sensitivty. I really hope they have. Although considering what I heard a dev talking about how it's a problem with ICS kernels in general....got me thinking it's not an easy fix. Cus even just upping the sensitivty doesn't help. The responsiveness is crap.

Not sure what was racist here???
[Galaxy S II General] ephraim:
The one where a member said about red dot etc and indians. A few pages back i believe. Yeah, that was a little kind of racist :)
[Galaxy S II General] VanillaCracker:
Oh, cus I was reading about 4 pages back and still didn't see it. People need to learn how to quote. It's not like I'm gonna look through 10 pages just to see what the hell someone is referring to haha.

Edit: Oh lmao, that was a moderator. I guess I take back my comment....lol.
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
Would be a brilliant marketing scheme. Will it happen though!

Heres a mockup i found on Deviantart. Doubt the next one will look anything like this. Looks smart though! Should adopt the design!
[Galaxy S II General] VanillaCracker:
Probably. Google is all about making stuff like that happen

Ew haha. I sure hope they don't put that curved banana into a phone design. Why would they make the device curve in on both sides? I find that very visually unpleasing, although I'm sure it fits well in your hand. But who the hell cares about that? It'd chop of the visual display too much, they're not gonna make that.
[Galaxy S II General] droid_1989:
FFS

Wish people would stiop with all the offensive posts, regardless of something being funny or not.

I'd rather this thread not get closed, as I read this thread daily, to see progress etc...
[Galaxy S II General] prbassplayer:
So I had to re clean thread in a matter of hours. If I see any more racism or flaming I will start handing out infractions.
[Galaxy S II General] Scarface1991:
codeworkx ‏@codeworkx

no ETA, no builds until stable/finished! be patient and let us work. bugging us results in pissed devs, results in zero developemt.

Get it?

So guys stop arguing around about statements like "dead development" because it only pisses off devs. Until then just enjoy ICS and wait :p
[Galaxy S II General] VanillaCracker:
ICS blowsssss. That's why everyone is so psyched about JB :D . No for real though, I wish we could have gotten feature heavy GB, I hate ICS haha.
[Galaxy S II General] drakester09:
Not really, ICS is perfectly fine. And it took a LOT of effort and time to get how it is right now. You should be more thankful.

People just are begging for Nexus support on non-Nexus hardware. That ain't really good thinking.

Statements like yours are completely discouraging for a developer. "I busted my ass off to get X working, you say it blows but still want me to bust my ass again for Y"...
[Galaxy S II General] kaimyn:
Those people have probably never done any development work themselves and can't appreciate the effort and pride that goes into something like this.
[Galaxy S II General] jackierobinson:
To be fair I don't think he was belittling the developers hard work, more saying that he preferred GB to ICS. Though I'm not sure why, ICS was a huge improvement. I think most people want jellybean for project butter, at least I do.
[Galaxy S II General] Logi_Ca1:
@Entropy512:

Is the TI OMAP called easy mode by you and Codeworkx because Google publishes version specific blobs for it due to the Galaxy Nexus using an OMAP4, or is it because Texas Instruments have a more open source friendly attitude? I'm asking so that we can have a better idea of what to expect from TI in the future.
[Galaxy S II General] hirak99:
Is there any chance of getting offline voice recognition of JB in ICS?

I saw a demo of JB, and if I were to choose one feature to get, that would be it. Not because it is offline, but because it is way way more accurate.
[Galaxy S II General] DrunkFuX666:
No it seems the only way for the voice to work is via the JB kernel... won't work without it which sucks... but... the closest you will get currently on ICS is by following the link for this Google Now for ICS link... there has just been a app released on the play store called voice for Google now or something like that... it adds voice to the Google now... but Ofcourse not the same as the original JB version...

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1747224

Sent from my Galaxy ICSII
[Galaxy S II General] Beefheart:
In other words saying we will definitely get it doesn't make it true. In my view Jellybean will not be coming to the S2 in an official capacity for the reasons I stated earlier in the thread, and I have seen nothing to change my mind.
[Galaxy S II General] burtallicus:
they barely released 4.0.4....i dont have high hopes for JB.....hope samsung will prove me wrong. anyway ill never buy a samsung phone again
[Galaxy S II General] rakeshishere:
I'm glad to know there's some communication by CM dev team about JB status on i9100.

If there was none, i would have seen more speculation in this thread.

It'll come but everyone needs to be patient :)

Sent from my Galaxy S2 powered by CM9
[Galaxy S II General] PakkaZA:
Yeah. If everyone could stop bashing Samsung and just wait patiently to see what happens...

One thing to consider when buying just about anything is the support (official and unofficial) for the device. And that's what I like about the S2. Because it was such a good seller, the development on the phone is very active. And because it was such a good seller, and maybe something may decide to support it officially. We'll just see
[Galaxy S II General] ephraim:
Thanks for the link man, added it on the first post with credits if you don't mind :)

Guys, updated the first post with this amazing news :)
[Galaxy S II General] Scarface1991:
Hey guys I just found this screenshot on @espenfjo`s Twitter Page.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23428636/device-2012-07-13-004729.png

It looks like Data is working according to this Screenshot. Strange thing is that the post is from the 13th July.

This is his page, go check it out:

https://twitter.com/espenfjo
[Galaxy S II General] rakeshishere:
Another pic from twitter by xplodwild

JB on Note means S2 is coming :-)

Sent from my Galaxy S2 powered by CM9
[Galaxy S II General] anshmiester78900:
Yes both have same hardware .!!
[Galaxy S II General] ephraim:
What a great day knowing that little by little, we'll soon get an AOSP JB :)
[Galaxy S II General] iamnotkurtcobain:
The kernel is also lower than in the Screenshot codeworkx postet (3.0.36)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] Scarface1991:
Is the Sound Chip also the same? since I heard that`s the biggest pain in the ass.
[Galaxy S II General] :
Great news??? Get JB soon??? Did I miss something???

"The Samsung Galaxy S II is in a very early state, we got it booting."

If that's all we got then that is neither good, nor new and sure as hell not "soon".
[Galaxy S II General] rakeshishere:
Both have same internals and sound chip is Yamaha

Sent from my Galaxy S2 powered by CM9
[Galaxy S II General] anshmiester78900:
Yes even i just confirmed it :)
[Galaxy S II General] ephraim:
I might have phrased that wrong. What i meant was at least we have news that someone is working on porting AOSP JB to our phone so that people can stop speculating whether or not cm team is ignoring our phone and prefer the G version of it. Anyway, no need for the attitude mate. You could've answered with respect. :)
[Galaxy S II General] drraptor:
The issue with s2 is screen, the colour look too saturated and my s2's has more red and green colour
[Galaxy S II General] ephraim:
I kinda like the over saturated look of our phone. It looks so nice :)
[Galaxy S II General] sahibunlimited:
Kernel is the same on both JB and ics

Its API related, not kernel.
[Galaxy S II General] deniz1905:
i am looking forward to it :)
[Galaxy S II General] VanillaCracker:
Devs know that people are very opinionated, and if they take offense by my comment then it's their fault for being sensitive.

I personally think that ICS slows down my ability to use my phones functions..signifcantly. That's my own opinion, and I don't disappreciate dev's working ON ics, I just don't like how ICS is. Devs fix bugs, make things stable, and add new features to ICS as they come across them. That's all great, and I'm glad for it. But that doesn't change what ICS is.

You're right, I've never developed anything myself, as I lack the knowledge. Wish I could contribute, and I may still pick up programming at some point as I know a bunch of friends who could teach me.

Most definitely. People are anticipating JB a lot more than ICS probably because First: it caught them off guard. It wasn't really in people's mindset that a .1 release would happen as many people think of the once a year main update. Second: JB is probably the biggest thing that's happened to android yet. Even though not everyone realizes that. Everyone likes features, and they're great, but real software tweaks like this...are what make platforms better. Not just adding more features like what ICS did (albeit it is also more efficient and clean). JB can be appreciated by everyone, since it effects most everything you do on your phone, not just having a new option or choice.
[Galaxy S II General] cool-face:
Maybe we got this... I have extra usb headset :D