yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] whitecracker:
That's the thread i flashed the radios from. I randomly flashed about half of them. No go.

I'll check the antenna as soon as i get a proper scewdriver.
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] whitecracker:
I've opened the antenna cover, nothing physically wrong with it.

I'm comparing signal strength on the desire and my galaxy nexus. (Same network, a couple of cm apart from each other)

Desire has -113dbm and 0 asu.

Galaxy nexus fluctuates around -85 dbm and 13 asu.

Unfortunately i have no ideea what these numbers mean but i guess the low values on the desire are bad.

What can cause this besides hardware failure?
[HTC EVO 3D] freakysick:
hex, i want to go back to stock EVO.

Now i have s-off with revolution.

How i can back to stock without bricking my device.

Need i cid?
[HTC EVO 3D] wloftus:
turn s-on with the fastboot command

relock your bootloader

download the stock rom from your provider ,rename it PG86IMG.zip and copy it to your sd card then boot into your boot loader... it should start updating to the stock rom then
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] milew666:
Just installed this browser to get rid of the annoying "browser not responding" and thus far, having pretty good luck and really liking the browser, much more than the stock.

My only gripe is, why can I not see the address bar when scrolled down far on the screen? For example, while in any other browser, if I am far down the page, as long as I "pull down" the address bar appears, but while in ICS quick browser, I have to scroll all the way back up to the top.

Is this a setting I can fix, or is that just the way it is? I hope is can be changed because I am really liking this browser.

Thanks!
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] deevo2:
if you tap once on the visible tab title area the address bar appears.

hope the above makes sense.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] milew666:
I tried that, I figured that would do the trick, but no. I have to go all the way back up. I wonder why this is. For example, I tried it on facebook as well as google news...somewhere I was able to be far down.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] milew666:
No other ideas? tapping in the tab area does nothing.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Arun01:
I been telling people about this browser for awhile now. It's badass! To get to a tab without scrolling all the way back up just tap the 4th button from the left next to the recent tabs key. It's what I always did. Hope that helps you.:good:
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] milew666:
4th button ? Sorry but when i lok at the top all i see is the current tab/tabs. What do you mean?
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] deevo2:
for me clicking on the tab works... for example clicking on the tab title for this page

[Q] ICS Quick Browser - x...

works to toggle the address bar on and off.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] milew666:
I'm an idiot! I wa clicking next to the tab, this worked!
[Android Apps and Games] TitansMobile:
[Beta][2.1+]Titans Mobile Playtest begins today

The playtest of Titans Mobile will start at 21:30 TODAY (Eastern) or 02:30 tomorrow morning (UTC). Join to claim your prizes!

We provide a high-speed download link of the APK since some of you gave us feedback about the low download speed.

Again: We promise a better game everyday!

Details please visit our forum.

@titansmobile.com
[Android Apps and Games] TitansMobile:
The Playtest starts NOW!
[Android Apps and Games] k4p741nkrunch:
Thank you for alerting us. This game is really fun, and easy to follow for anyone familiar with Facebook games. The UI could use a little more flair and perhaps a better loading animation, but so far I'm impressed.

Edit: Adding a link to the site for a quick click.

http://titansmobile.com
[Android Apps and Games] TitansMobile:
Thanks for your most valuable feedback. Have you filled in our in-game survey? It's the easiest way to let us thank you with rewards :)
[Android Apps and Games] k4p741nkrunch:
Yes I did the in game survey. Also, by loading graphic I mean the small "loading" text when switching between screens. The initial splash screen for the game is quite awesome.
[Android Apps and Games] Intruder7s:
No support for tablets eh? "Application not installed" .

Any chance for it to be enabled later? Seems really nice!
[Android Apps and Games] TitansMobile:
Thanks k4, your suggestion is well received. I'd say it's a very good and inspiring one.
[Android Apps and Games] TitansMobile:
Sorry for not clearing that up, the game does not support tablets/ipads right now. But we are seriously considering the possibility here.
[Android Apps and Games] ArcticFish:
Very nice game

Add me MVN4N5

Sent from my SGH-T989
[Android Apps and Games] k4p741nkrunch:
If anybody joins up, please come to Athens! We need to beat Troy!
[Android Apps and Games] ArcticFish:
^ I will murder u :D

Sent from my SGH-T989
[Android Apps and Games] k4p741nkrunch:
There's a sanction on my head now. Come at me bro!
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] Eskern:
Moved to http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=27904796#post27904796
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] Ticklefish:
If you have a Mini, rather than a X10 Mini, you need to go to that forum rather than this one. I'm sure you'll find an answer there. :-)
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] Eskern:
ok, thanks, I was unaware they were 2 different devices...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] CountryBoy_71:
Okay, I don't think this has been asked a million times; yet!

I am currently running SKYICS 4.2E-17(ULCE2) on my Rogers Skyrocket on the Bell network and the rom is fantastic and runs very well.

My question is, are there any big benefits to changing over to SKYICS (R-UXCLF3 BASE) 4.2F or should I just leave well enough alone and stay.

I see lots of people having great success on both.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mr_clean5953:
Make a nandroid and try it out. Maybe you'll like it even more. And if not just nandroid back.

Sent from my SGS 2 LTE running SkyICS
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] UZ7:
Yeah I would make backups then try it out. There are so many choices in roms that I sometimes end up with 3-4 different ones lol but I check which one works to my liking and stick with that one. :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] dvandam:
I'd wait a little while. The Rogers Rom was released not even a week ago and while Seanz is a good developer, they're still ironing out some of the bugs and tweaking for performance. I'd say wait until at least July 1, as he is updating the code nearly daily at this point. By then some of the bigger issues should be all fixed.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] vincom:
there were no big issues as its based off his 4.2e rom and sean cherry picked alot of stuff off of rogers ics, the minor issue was with twux, every major item on the phone worked, like calls data wifi bt.

when coming from a backup u have to flash the radio seperatly as its not part of a nandroid, if its ucle2 then flash it according to seans 4.2e thread. btw sean wont be working on 4.2e anymore(as far as i know), so any future updates will be for 4.2f
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] prbassplayer:
This boils down to "X>Y?" and I do not allow them. Read try and make that decision yourself. Locked.

Cheers
[Galaxy S I9000 General] cezaralboiu:
Whats happen if i flash an i9000 rom on my i9001?
[Galaxy S I9000 General] dark_knight35:
Your device will die.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] gizmoichitzo:
it's pretty clear as answer ^^
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] LukBoy99:
Guys,I flashed to mini cm7 after I didn't admire minicm9 (no offence naa) but this time 2.2.1 was out and I wanted to flash semod as its very look nice but when flashed got bootloops so I reflashed but I still want it can any1 help?
[Galaxy S III General] mikeeo019:
The name tells everything. This thread will help you to find the best ROM and Kernel if you're looking for pure performance. The best scores will be listed in the second post.

Post your whole setup you're running and screenshots of the scores.

Antutu and Quadrant scores would be great.

Please list the:

-ROM you're running

-Kernel

-CPU frequency

-I/O scheduler

-

So it's time for me to post my own scores:

Setup:

-Omega 6.0

-Siyah 1.2.6

-1700mHz

-VR
[Galaxy S III General] mikeeo019:
Current top scores from Sak500

Setup: Blackstar V2 ROM with Perseus kernel
[Galaxy S III General] danielmm88:
-Omega 6.0

-Siyah 1.2.6

-1704mHz

-noop
[Galaxy S III General] sak500:
Currently on perseus kernel @ 1800mhz

Blackstar v2 ROM
[Galaxy S III General] rajveerrockz17:
Please can anybody post their stock firmware benchmark results. I am getting very low results in the ranges between 8000 to 9000.
[Galaxy S III General] apofisapep:
Stock firmware
[Galaxy S III General] danielmm88:
Man you're lucky to be able to OC your S3 to 1800mhz.

I can't even OC it to 1800mhz at 1475mV without it restarting.
[Galaxy S III General] Diaze:
mine on stock

@rajverrock maybe u get that results bcuz ur running the benchmark with power saving mode enabled
[Galaxy S III General] hazri1974:
Stock XXALF6
[Galaxy S III General] sak500:
What's ur rom and kernel? I've had problem with siyah and other kernels so have stayed with perseus.
[Galaxy S III General] Tachikoma_kun:
Stock LF1 with all the VodaFone bloatware but S-Voice disabled.
[Galaxy S III General] danielmm88:
I posted my results a few posts above yours

Siyah 1.2.6 and Omega 6.0
[Galaxy S III General] As2O:
im using aokp rom with siyah kernal

im running at 1700ghz :)

tried 1800ghz already but it just seems to reboot
[Galaxy S III General] rajveerrockz17:
Friend I have checked that my power saving mode is disabled and still i am getting the same results. And also my Antutu tells that my S3 runs on ArmV7 with triple core. Is this a bug or really my phone has triple core not a quadcore? Can anybody confirm it? Thanks for your help friends.:(
[Galaxy S III General] michael.s.under:
Can you add what the highest score holder is running to the second post. This way we dont have to search through the pages to find out.

In this case its easy while the number of pages is low but to help going forward.

Edit: Also does it make sense to have a quad core high bench as well as a dual core??

Love the post, thanks.
[Galaxy S III General] audino:
Im using omega 7 fresh wipe installed and siyah 1.2.6 but the maximum Im getting is 5900, do you use oc and extewaks if what are your settings?
[Galaxy S III General] c903jerk:
[YOUTUBE]<object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/j2ij1lpOayE?version=3&feature=player_detailpage"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/j2ij1lpOayE?version=3&feature=player_detailpage" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="360"></object>[/YOUTUBE]

I uploaded this video on my YouTube channel.
[Galaxy S III General] Baldilocks:
Nothing there.....
[Galaxy S III General] sak500:
As mentioned above i've o/c'd the phone to 1800mhz. That's how the score is high. Also i dont know if siyah is good for o/c but perseus and nimpahatimine are good kernels.
[Galaxy S III General] just4u32:
I am getting 15569 with JB 4.1.2 (Wanamlite and Perseus kernel). I was thinking "Hey, that's good", but after sumbitting score I was a I9300 owner with 24381! He is on 1800MHz, when I am on 1700MHz.

How can I get impressive result like that?
[Galaxy S III General] b-eock:
I dislike anyone who is in this thread. Benchmarks are not reliable at all. ®©™ This is ultimately a best ROM thread (stated in OP) which isn't allowed.
[Galaxy S III General] nhariamine:
Will you please shut the hell up and go back to ur phone forum and leave us benchmarking..... thank u

nhariamine
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Are you longing for a vacation from xda? Your attitude surely indicates it.
[Galaxy S III General] nhariamine:
pfffff, you make me sick Sahwty.......whatever
[Galaxy S III General] atilla88:
AW: [I9300] Post your benchmark scores

16745

Stock xxelkc

Overclocked to 1.5 ghz

Hmm the xda app won't let me upload a pic....
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
I don't know any Sahwty. :confused:
[Galaxy S III General] b-eock:
Well first off I have an S3 GT-I9300. And you don't know the rules do you? At least some of us do.
[Galaxy S III General] nhariamine:
you see, that's why shorty minor inferior people like u shouldn't get any attention regardless of your stupidity an lack of respect, grow the **** up

---------- Post added at 11:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:29 PM ----------

possible brick here, WRONG FORUM...
[Galaxy S III General] b-eock:
I'm using my Captivate at the moment. Use your common sense, if you have any. I'm done here. I'm not going to argue with a petulant adult.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
You are a definite expert of forming nonsensical sentences, gotta give you that.
[Galaxy S III General] nhariamine:
i'm done with you idiot, added to ignore list where you deserve to be
[Galaxy S III General] kaspervkristensen:
Sv: [I9300] Post your benchmark scores

stock rom and decent score
[Galaxy S III General] mkendra:
My best quadrant score and actually biggest I've ever seen on any GS3 is 7217. I was on Android Revolution HD 16 (don't rembember exact tweaks I had) and Perseus Kernel @1704mhz.

Now I'm running Android Revolution HD 21.0 with stock kernel @1400mhz. It get's only 5876 points in quadrant but it has never run so smooth as it runs now.

I don't have antutu benchmark from earlier but at the moment it gets 16252. Like I said the phone is really smooth.
[Galaxy S III General] bafforosso:
ROM: FoxHound 1.9

Kernel: Siyah 1.8.9+

Android: 4.1.2

CPU Freq: 1400 MHz

I/O Scheduler: row
[Galaxy S III General] TigerCourage:
Stock EMA2
[Galaxy S III General] i9100g user:
Hey guys anyone used antutu 3d rating benchmark? It here: https://play.google.com/store/apps/...=organic&utm_term=3d+rating+antutu+play+store

Stock xella 4.1.2 perseus kernel

My sd card sucks due to some mods
[Galaxy S III General] chrisian3:
Custom Rom- Revolutionary S5v3, :o
[Galaxy S III General] robindebruin:
Why all so bad i have 21000 i will post soon

Verstuurd vanaf mijn GT-I9300 met Tapatalk
[Galaxy S III General] Failyx:
Hypermax ROM ?

Yank Kernel.
[Galaxy S III General] i9100g user:
23.5k on antutu
[Galaxy S III General] kristijan505:
3,5GHz or what? 23,5k is to damn high for S3, it would be nice if you would share some tips for making it score so much :D
[Galaxy S III General] i9100g user:
I don't have a screen shot of 23.5k ,but I got that once.

Overclock and overvolt on both CPU and GPU actually thermals matter a lot .
[Galaxy S III General] flither:
del
[Galaxy S III General] claptraw:
Yesterday's screenshot

- CM11 M7

- Boeffla Kernel 2.2

- 1600 MHz with -25 mV undervolting

But I'm not fully performance orientated and still experimenting a bit for best compromise regarding performance and battery.

Still impressive what you can get out of the slow ass Touchwiz S3 with just a couple of software tweaks.

~ GT-i9300 ~ CM11 M7 ~ Boeffla Kernel 2.2 ~ XDA Premium 4
[Galaxy S III General] Hydrony:
L-Droid 2.2.2

Boeflla Kernel [MENTION=1247388]1.6[/MENTION]ghz

Slightly overclocked GPU

Antutu: 22000

Send from my GT-9300 with Android 4.4.4
[Galaxy S III General] CyberianIce:
CM11 Nightly (was 4.4.2 at the time with AGN! PureCM Kernel without OC - 1400MHz with -50mV UV)

[MENTION=5605175]flither[/MENTION]

You are running benchmark in Airplane mode, your results can't be verified and accurate)
[Galaxy S III General] flither:
what do you mean "not accurate"? Internet connection is only needed for uploading the scores to the database and updating other scores. The test itself doesn't require being online, the score is the score.
[Galaxy S III General] claptraw:
When other users let their network and wifi turned on, you simply can't compare it with your scores, because the circumstances are different. Background synchronisation and so on are factors which slow your phone down. Without connection you eliminate these factors and boost your phones performance in a very slight but cheap way.

~ GT-i9300 ~ CM11 M8 ~ Boeffla Kernel 2.3~ XDA Premium 4
[Galaxy S III General] flither:
We are measuring the maximum capability of the phones components. If your thinking was right than I have to turn on wi-fi, data, launch some games, make a call and then measure? In this case you cannot compare the scores because each person's wi-fi and data are consuming different resources depending on quality of the signal etc. So before the test you turn off everything what can, clear RAM, set your CPU and GPU to the highest, choose the best gov and scheduler. Does it state any measuring conditions in the OP ? NO, it's a BENCHMARK, so stop trolling other people and turn your wi-fi off next time, cheers:good:
[Galaxy S III General] flither:
Ok, I re-took the bench in case of being accused of cheating ;) This time with network and wi-fi on (althought I do not have wi-fi in my place). Changed the ROM from Neat to latest weekly Slim, newest Boeffla kernel NG 2.4 beta1, the rest unchanged.

What shall I turn on next time? :confused:
[Galaxy S III General] claptraw:
Everybody who posted here had their wifi and signal turned on and you seriously think, you're the only one doing it right? Ok, have a nice life, cheater...

~ GT-i9300 ~ CM11 M8 ~ Boeffla Kernel 2.3~ XDA Premium 4
[Galaxy S III General] flither:
[MENTION=5904349]claptraw[/MENTION], calm down. I'm too old for cheating, you got my score taken as anyone else. I think it's cause you cannot reach that and behaving like a little kid. I got good quality CPU on my phone (asv level 8) - maybe thats why I can reach this. You trying to make me feel guilty for this? Grow up.
[Galaxy S III General] jasi275:
i don't belive in benchmarks anymore after learning samsung's been faking them on s4 and note 3 they may have done that on s3 too
[Galaxy S III General] claptraw:
Hm 2.000 antutu points more don't necessarely mean any performance difference. Everyone knows that benchmarks are just for statistical reasons and have no practical value. Take the LG G3: its benchmark scores are far superior to our S3s but the homescreen transitions and scrolling in the browser lags as ****. so try to brag about your score ;) in reality we would most likely so no performances differences if we compared our both phones.

~ GT-i9300 ~ CM11 M8 ~ Boeffla Kernel 2.3~ XDA Premium 4
[Galaxy S III General] CyberianIce:
Man, don't do this, it's just lame. This practise is considered as cheating on benchmarking score as previous replays answered well. It is very cheap way for boosting performance for a little, on which you actually can't count on in normal operation. We are benchmarking mobile phone here, so if you turn off your mobile network, this device can't be considered as an communication device at all, especially because turning WiFi and Mobile off will disable certain processes which are essential part of fully working mobile phone in normal operation and conditions are not equal for comparison with other users which makes your results useless for this topic. What you do to convince yourself is not in my concern, but in this topic please post normal results (without turning ariplane mode on) so we others can use this data to compare.
[Galaxy S III General] flither:
God of Thunders, what kind of people are on this thread, I wrote CLEARLY - I took the 2nd test WITH network and WITH wi-fi search ON but wi-fi icon is NOT showing because I do NOT have my own or open wi-fi signal in my place. Isn't my English clear enough? [MENTION=901424]Cyberian[/MENTION]lce - I know we are testing mobile phones here, so please stop this pointless discussion as my score is taken "as you think it should" now (since yesterday), so please enjoy.

EDIT: If you still planning to diss my "unbelieveable" score, here is the score taken recently with the same Boeffla NG kernel and zzmove gov(I used performance, for comparison)

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=54180456&postcount=4603. So once more - stop this pointless dissing brag.
[Galaxy S III General] CyberianIce:
What makes you thing your score is unbelievable? Dude, I have 22k on stock frequencies and I can easily go over for more than 2k if I OC CPU and GPU, but I have no interests in doing so.
[Galaxy S III General] flither:
So the thread should be renamed to "Post your benchmark scores on stock frequencies". But there's nothing thrilling in using bench and posting results just to convince the others - "look, my phone is as fast as it is supposed to be!" So benchmark idea is dying here, as we are comparing the same phone models. Boredom
[Galaxy S III General] CyberianIce:
What is your problem, nobody complained about OC, just about airplane mode that is all. What are you trying to accomplish with this statement? Why are you now posting this offtopic?
[Galaxy S III General] C.3.S.4.R:
-S5 Sensation V4.2 (Based on archiport 4.4.2)

-Boeffla kernel 6.1 beta 1

-1704

-row
[Galaxy S III General] jojohnson250:
not quite the S3 ? ? ? ? ? ?
[Galaxy S III General] flither:
How did your make it? looks like a bug. I'm not getting more than 7000 with Quadrant
[Galaxy S III General] C.3.S.4.R:
maybe is a bug on the port i dont know
[Galaxy S III General] Full HD:
Config: See signature with pegasusqplus standard, row scheduler, 1024 kb read ahead, stock values in CPU and GPU
[Galaxy S III General] Full HD:
Overclocked @ 1.7 GHz :cool:
[Galaxy S III General] konohanz:
awesome dude, even my s3 best score was 22.000 with 1,7 Ghz oc :crying:
[Galaxy S III General] Dexter 01:
26794 wow amazing galaxy s4 has the same score :cool:
[Galaxy S III General] shephart:
I have 27k :) In antutu v5 (QS port with blekota kenel)

---------- Post added at 06:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:06 PM ----------

Nice joke :cool:
[Galaxy S III General] cangcan:
this was mine.. :(
[Galaxy S III General] osi1998:
Which kernel?
[Galaxy S III General] reaperdevO7:
CM11 Latest Nightly..! That's all..!
[Galaxy S III General] reaperdevO7:
CM11 Clocked @ 1.7Ghz
[Galaxy S III General] Grimzee:
You seem disappointed by that score..
[Galaxy S III General] gabyif:
ArchiDroid 1.7.18 CPU 1.6
[Galaxy S III General] tareq-hakeem:
Galaxy s5 mini rom beffla kernel overclock 1600
[Galaxy S III General] toxstoxs:
I9300 CM11 4.4.4 nightly 20 Sept 2014 Agni Kernel OC 1,704 Ghz
[Galaxy S III General] reaperdevO7:
Android 4.4.4-CM 11 M10- Boeffla kernel-clocked @ 1.7GHz
[Galaxy S III General] Rafhael92:
UltimaROM 4.4.2 Boeffla Kernel. Cpu at 1.4ghz. Configuration stock. No tweaking.
[Galaxy S III General] amir2012:
The average of results is about 25000 on the Right?
[Galaxy S III General] reaperdevO7:
Anyone with more score here? If yes, then, Plz tell how u did it..!
[Galaxy S III General] i9100g user:
1600mhz cpu
[Galaxy S III General] Clark789:
A little bit more...

Regards

Clark
[Galaxy S III General] AhmedO.:
Rom: Blekota S5 Lite V7.0

Kernel: Boeffla Kernel

CPU frequency: 1600 mHz

Can't see the screenshot ? My score is 27672 on AnTuTu

:)
[Galaxy S III General] loris100:
Liquid Smooth

Boeffla kernel 2.4 beta6

Cpu 1704mhz
[Galaxy S III General] vinodr5371@xdaroms.co.in:
wich rom & kernal r u using ?
[Galaxy S III General] loris100:
ROM: Liquid Smooth KitKat v3.2-2014-09-14

Kernel: Boeffla kernel CM11.0 NG kernel - Test 2.4-beta6a
[Galaxy S III General] fiendy:
sheesh, and I thought I was winning till I seen this, might have to try a few more tweaks.

I'm using slimkat with boeffla kernel, 1704mhz cpu, 400 zram, pegasusplus governor actually gave a better score than performance.

got this score using dalvik but have since switched to ART, does anybody know if antutu scores correctly using ART? my scores have dropped since

after some tweaks, (oc gpu and overvolt)

I know benchmarks aren't a perfect gauge of how well a device works but I'd be interested to see if anyone can beat mine