yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] chongns:
yes. every one is trying to help.. pray for it:thumbup:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] hillbeast:
I'll try apply this and see what it does.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Adi_Pat:
I just applied that patch and it does work. Got rid of the warning. Thumbs up!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] arindammanidas:
Something tells me you found the phone :p:D

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy SL on CyanogenMod 9 !
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] XDA_Bam:
OK. However, that's actually 'bad' because the warning was also thrown in the 2.6.35.7 GB kernel, so this wasn't keeping the 3.0.8 from booting. But I just stumbled upon something interesting. The log in the OP ends at a point where the GB kernel would do the following:

...
[ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys debug
[ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct
[ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys freezer
[ 0.000000] CPU: Testing write buffer coherency: ok
>>>OP LOG ENDS HERE<<<
[ 0.000000] regulator: core version 0.5
[ 0.000000] NET: Registered protocol family 16
[ 0.000000] OMAP GPIO hardware version 2.5
[ 0.000000] omap_mux_init: Add partition: #1: core, flags: 0
[ 0.000000] msecure_pin setting: GPIO 2, 1
[ 0.000000]
[ 0.000000] -----------------------------------------------------------
[ 0.000000] Latona HW Information
[ 0.000000] Device Type : HS_DEVICE
[ 0.000000] Latona HW Revision : REV 1.0
[ 0.000000] Powerup Reason : reboot_normal
[ 0.000000] Boot Mode : 0
[ 0.000000] -----------------------------------------------------------
[ 0.000000]
[ 0.000000] *******board_peripherals_init*****
[ 0.000000] [USB]usb_gadget_init : register android_usb
...

(for the full log, see this GB dmesg)

So it's starting to handle GPIOs there. Now, there's a discussion about a very similar problem in the androidforums community. The interesting part starts here and the solution is posted further down in the thread. I'm not sure that this is our current problem, but it seems to be closely related. Maybe you could have a look - I don't know enough about it to tell :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] voit:
...nook color having the same hardware got official CM10
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Under03Ground:
Looks like you found the phone. Good luck with the development then.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] BassBlaster:
Nook color doesn't have the same hardware as i9003, it has omap3621 not omap3630 like our i9003. Nook color and our i9003 only share the same GPU (SGX530).
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] voit:
Surely man omap3621 and omap3630 have nothing in common. Shame on me.

And some info from Texas Instruments here
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] hillbeast:
Just because the CPU is the same, doesn't mean they work the same way. For example, don't expect to install Nokias N9 software on this phone. It won't work. They share the same CPU.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] voit:
nice to see you. did you find what comunity expected? :D

P.S. Unfortunately I'm too lazy to give here links to cases when devs took code from one device and it was implemented on another (nook and i9003).

P.P.S. I'm very dissapointed that I can't run N9 firmware on my i9003. It would be the greatest achievment.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Mamica:
HillBeast i saw what happened in new zealand today!hope you are ok!!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] hillbeast:
If you're referring to the volcano then yes I'm fine. Its on the other main island so its quite a way from me.

And to the other people who think I'm sitting around not contributing to anything seeing I can't find the phone, I have been working with Adi to get MTD working this week.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] wrishaba:
will it be useful

I have no knowledge about these kernel scripts

But I would rather search some findings about the kernels

Plz see whether its useful or not

http://git.omapzoom.org/?p=kernel/omap.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/android-omap-3.0
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] hillbeast:
Thanks but I've seen that link so many times I could almost recite it from memory. I've used that kernel and it refused to cooperate.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] venetkens:
Thanks Adi!

https://github.com/AdiPat/android_kernel_samsung_latona_3.0

:)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] simratcs:
What is that suppose to mean ???

Are we near kernal 3.0 ??

Sent from my GT-I9003
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Gondya bhau:
he had to repair the soldering of his UART today morning...dunno whether he got it done....maybe he will test this build once thats done...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Adi_Pat:
Looking through whats killing the Kernel, will try to fix that and test it tomorrow when my UART is fixed.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] simratcs:
Guyz ..i am totally blow..

With minds like aditya , dheeraj ,hillbeast(!)...

Our community has now become soo cool...as adi said we will get kernel 3 by new year thats mind ****ing awesome...

Now the actual game begins !! :cool: :eek:

Sent from my GT-I9003
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] rishabh_2795:
Are u serious! By new year!!?? wow dat'd b the greatest thing ever :D:D:highfive:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Mamica:
have you spoken with him??
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] simratcs:
no bro,itz on the fb group !!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] hillbeast:
Read it again. I think you've misread it.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] simratcs:
Hahha..My bad...sorry dude and to whom ever it may concern...!! :p

Sent from my GT-I9003
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] rishabh_2795:
what is it? please paste dhiru's post on this thread guys..:eek::eek:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Mamica:
so it wont be by new year?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] chongns:
nope, it wont be any near.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Adi_Pat:
I said,

I hope I can get it working by new year

-_-
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] erciolino:
Ok, so let's hope together without expectations.. :fingers-crossed: (just begin to write your Santa Claus letter, guys :laugh:)

In you we trust! ;)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Adi_Pat:
[DEV]

So I have started playing around with stuff here..

Thought of posting here just to keep you guys updated (But don't bug me for ETA's! )

I just thought of porting the existing 2.6.35 code into 3.0.. and I have made a bit of progress upto now(I guess!)..

I set up printk flags everywhere in the board-code.. and the Kernel dies 'just' before the board_init function..

Here is the log: http://pastebin.com/WtuYc0gL

My git: https://github.com/AdiPat/android_kernel_samsung_latona_3.0/commits/latona-3.0-port

My latest commit

Look at Line 359, I commented omap2_init_common_hw() .. and as per 2.6.35 , it initializes the powerdomains..

When I compared the LG Kernel and omapzoom kernel, I found that LG has removed some powerdomain code.

So I will put it all back in there and try again..

As for these warnings..

<4>omap_hwmod: _populate_mpu_rt_base found no _mpu_rt_va for l4_core
<4>omap_hwmod: _populate_mpu_rt_base found no _mpu_rt_va for l4_per
<4>omap_hwmod: _populate_mpu_rt_base found no _mpu_rt_va for l4_wkup
<4>omap_hwmod: _populate_mpu_rt_base found no _mpu_rt_va for usbhs_ohci
<4>omap_hwmod: _populate_mpu_rt_base found no _mpu_rt_va for usbhs_ehci
<4>omap_hwmod: gpt12_fck: missing clockdomain for gpt12_fck.

They are surely not killing the Kernel since they appear in the LG OB Kernel too(Working, bootable one) ..

And Big thanks to hillbeast and dhiru for their experience and help..!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] dhiru1602:
An update from my side too.

I have been trying to get MTD working on 2.6.35 before we use it on 3.0 since it would be better to fix issues with 2.6.35 and then port it to 3.0

So far I was able to initialize the Onenand and create partitions. We will have to include yaffs and make changes to the ramdisk.

<6>OneNAND driver initializing
<6>omap2-onenand omap2-onenand: initializing on CS0, phys base 0x08000000, virtual base e0880000
<7>OneNAND Manufacturer: Samsung (0xec)
<6>Muxed OneNAND 512MB 1.8V 16-bit (0x50)
<6>OneNAND version = 0x0241
<7>Chip support all block unlock
<7>Chip has 4KiB pagesize
<6>Scanning device for bad blocks
<4>Bad eraseblock 2047 at 0x1ffc0000
<5>Creating 7 MTD partitions on "omap2-onenand":
<5>0x000001480000-0x000001c80000 : "boot"
<5>0x000001c80000-0x000002480000 : "recovery"
<5>0x000002480000-0x00001ca80000 : "datadata"
<5>0x00001ca80000-0x00001dc00000 : "cache"
<5>0x00001dc00000-0x00001e880000 : "efs"
<5>0x00001e880000-0x00001f880000 : "radio"
<5>0x00001f880000-0x000020000000 : "reservoir"
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] hillbeast:
What is that partition layout based on ?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] dhiru1602:
Actually SL uses a different partition layout when compared to Aries devices. I have used the partition info from SBL inorder to create partitions on Onenand.

https://github.com/dhiru1602/samsung-kernel-latona/commit/0b9382515ac8ef43db93bee2f568b580a81acef4
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] simratcs:
I am really very very sorry...

Sorry i misunderstood what adi said !!

Sent from my GT-I9003
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] hillbeast:
Use this:

major minor #blocks name	label	size (byte)	size (hex)

139 1 256 tfsr1	Pbl	262144	40000
139 2 256 tfsr2	Pbl	262144	40000
139 3 10240 tfsr3	?	10485760	A00000
139 4 1280 tfsr4	Sbl	1310720	140000
139 5 1280 tfsr5	Sbl	1310720	140000
139 6 7680 tfsr6	param	7864320	780000

= 1480000

139 7 8192 tfsr7	kernel	8388608	800000
139 8 8192 tfsr8	recovery	8388608	800000
139 9 341504 tfsr9	system	349700096	14D80000
139 10 79872 tfsr10	dbdata	81788928	4E00000
139 11 35840 tfsr11	cache	36700160	2300000
139 12 512 tfsr12	--	524288	80000
139 13 17920 tfsr13	modem	18350080	1180000

static struct mtd_partition onenand_partitions[] = {
{
.name = "kernel",
.offset = 1480000,
.size = 0x800000,
},
{
.name = "recovery", // This partition is not utilised by the Sbl, and can probably be removed in favour of extending system
.offset = MTDPART_OFS_APPEND,
.size = 0x800000,
},
{
.name = "system",
.offset = MTDPART_OFS_APPEND,
.size = 0x14D80000,
},
{
.name = "dbdata", // This partition can probably be removed and system made larger if needed
.offset = MTDPART_OFS_APPEND,
.size = 0x4E00000,
},
{
.name = "cache",
.offset = MTDPART_OFS_APPEND,
.size = 0x2300000,
},
};

I figured that one out the other night and it's more accurate.

EDIT: As for /efs and the modem partitions, your best off using a single partition for both and putting an image of modem.bin and efs in there, and making a loop device node for the Samsung libraries to use for accessing the modem firmware.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] venetkens:
Just a question,sorry if it is stupid.

The thread in the development section is still closed. Why not reopen it now that development proceeds?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] hillbeast:
Because most likely I will get flamed and abused like I was before, seeing I'm the OP.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Gondya bhau:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ynfzjj7yAUU/T3B-1-kz4rI/AAAAAAAAB-w/pXfxOd9KK5M/s1600/true+story.jpg
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] erickkhhk:
I don't know the actual situation,but I read before someone saying that we are waiting LG optimistic black offical update for the kernel. I saw some kernel 3.0 in the optimistic black forum, can't it help？ sorry if I was wrong…

Sent from my GT-I9003
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] chongns:
you are not wrong but late. they are already started using that source long time ago.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] erickkhhk:
I see, I just think they are developing the first kernel for the CPU without any sources:p

Sent from my GT-I9003
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] maksimus0021:
This is how to raise children! First - it's hard. Second - easier. Importantly patience! My friends, all will be well! :laugh:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] mjbri0613:
so hows the phone MR. HB?

just tell us to forget the phone and well do it...

REALLY??? A MONTH OF SEARCHING?? then WHAT'S NEXT?? A MONTH of?? helping in building kernel 3.x ?? REALLY?? :what:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] loneagl:
An official announcement by HB will only spark off another row.I think we can all accept now that the device is lost.

On the other hand Dhiru is so close to a working kernel 3.x.so i say let bygones be bygones.

I just wanna say to all- forget it friends.useless fighting is actually setting us back in development.Atleast HB is helping Dhiru n Adi.

Regards.

"why doesn't anybody kill the dj?"
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] imjustafq:
i dont think the phone is really lost. i think it's with with him seeing he's helping dhiru.. with what? invisible SL? lol .....
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Under03Ground:
yea forget the lost phone guys. conscience and karma will do the judgement for us.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] hillbeast:
/rage
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kishankpadiyar:
Who cares if the phone is lost or found..:p at least there is some progress with the Kernel 3.x.. that is what matter.. Hillbeast is helping.. be thankfull to him.. v can flame him later.. :laugh: :good:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Under03Ground:
nahh it doesn't really matter to me anyways. so you did help sir dhiru for setting up with the UART? thats good thank you.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] sh7adeh:
hilbeast

Because I totally didn't just finish helping Dhiru for the last 4 hours with getting kernel 3.x booting all the way through the init process and guiding him through setting the UART settings correctly to account for kernel 3.0 changing how OMAP names the UART devices so he can get into shell to perform various debugging functions.

As for conscience, I feel like **** already for losing the phone. I don't need you rubbing it in every five posts. I'm getting sick of it.

yeaaah .. 4 hours , 4 days , 4 weeks , 4 months , 5 decades , 4 X 4
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Mamica:
c'mon!!stop this ****!!!he is helping dhiru and i think no one can help him like hillbeast and i saw their progress on github( https://github.com/dhiru1602 ) so pls stop criticize for human error!it can heppen to anyone!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] piernodoyuna:
At least..who is hilbeast?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Mamica:
he is a Recognized Developer that help dhiru with kernel 3.0
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] maksimus0021:
Everyone has the right to be wrong ! Stop it !!!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
I think this thread's name should be changed to "useless discussion on lost & found phone" :D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] mjbri0613:
he help dhiru? really MR. HB?? REALLY?? YOU REALLY HELP dhiru? or you just saw his github?

REALLY you HELPS dhiru?

i dont think so..

all noobs here are welcome to post.. but pls read all the thread first and understand why is this happening..

dont just act that you know a lot here..
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Hetalk:
Sorry for OT. But, I feel our group is a gal. Every specific time of the month, it needs to flame someone or other.

My suggestion, close this thread, at least for now, till there's a alpha release of 3.x kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] mjbri0613:
oh MR. HB Helps dhiru.. but in 4months of having the phone.. he dont help his self..

and now helping the SL's god? :what:

REALLY?

thanks for helping MR recognize developer..
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] imjustafq:
whether the phone is there or not.. which i think the phone isn't lost.. and it's with HB alright *i think*...

and isn't invisible like i said which i didn't really mean.. what i really mean for the invisible is that the phone is there and not that HB is working empty handed and not that he is dancing all the time for sure.. *i think*

we SL users have to be very very thankful that few of these human being willing-kind-heartedly to provide and spend their time and super duper powerful knowledge about coding and building file parts such as on this highly-hard-core-long-awaited 3.0 kernel for our device.. think, that IF they didn't do anything and start anything and waste their time.. we wouldn't and will never ever hear and think about of having the kernel on our device.. some people on this thread are just some bunch of thrash talkers.. i don't mean to be frank.. but it's true.. there are some of them.. who know nothing.. none about programming stuffs.... i hope HB, dhiru, adipat and more will continue their work peacefully and ignore these people.. thank you..

---------- Post added at 10:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:56 PM ----------

if you guys look deeply into dhiru's git.. don't be shock .. adi's and HB's are all over...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] hillbeast:
I've had enough of the drama. I'll put this in size 7 and bold red font:

I'M DONE

Sure I lost the device. I apologised and did all I could to find it. Was it my fault, most likely. Perhaps it was stolen by my dodgy flatmate, but I should take better care of my possessions, especially if it was donated to me.

Sure I didn't spend much time on the device when I first got it. I was busy at work but I should have prioritised myself better. Was it my fault? Yes.

I've apologised all I could for my mistakes but certain members of the community with their hateful messages are now actually making me feel like ****. I'm actually considering leaving the XDA for good just to get away from this name. I've been using the name 'hillbeast' for almost 8 years now and I'm close to giving that name up just to get away from my transgressions.

But I'm not a coward, and I'm not a loser. I wasn't in this for fame or money or possessions. I was in this to make devices better. That's why I develop: to make stuff work better than it was meant to, or make it do something it shouldn't, but when I am feeling like crap when trying to do something that is supposed to make me feel good, I need to take a step back and walk away.

I've had enough of feeling like crap from the words of this community, I came to you guys thinking you would be nice, and sure I have let some of you down, but come on, you act like I did absolutely nothing positive whatsoever.

So with that, I am unsubscribing from this thread, and leaving this community for good. If Vishal wishes to get in contact with me to arrange a way to reimburse the device, then he can feel free to PM me.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] imjustafq:
so it's his dodgy flatmate's fault. that guy stole the phone then. so, **** that guy.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] voit:
@vishal

I think you that you have all rights to arrarange reimbursemet
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] sh7adeh:
seriously ??

ARE U AN IDIOT ?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Adi_Pat:
SERIOUSLY PEOPLE, SHUT THE **** Up. ENOUGH AND STOP THIS **** NOw.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] mashaal95:
You are helping the community in NO WAY WHATSOEVER!!!!

Seriously man!! Look at HB's Contributions towards XDA??!!!!! How many do you have??!! HOOWW MMANNNYY???!!!!!!!!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] crk1995:
I knew this day would come.

I feel the older members of this community are patient enough but the new members trying to flame and chase this great developer away.

Sorry hillbeast from everybody's side.

We were already scarce of good developers.

Pls dont go like this.

Atleast support dhiru untill kernel 3.x

Then its your wish.

Pls try to ignore all such irrelevant posts. Pls.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] mikef:
I am at work now, but I will be going through this thread and considering what to do. I told you guys to stop but you wouldn't listen, and now I will have to do some things I would rather not have to do with regards to handing out infractions. Again, this will be for not doing as instructed by mods, both myself and wardfan220 have told you guys to stop.

Unfortunately your actions have now affected the Galaxy SL community by making it unlikely you will ever get a working 3.0 kernel now. Congratulations. Good work. Really good work...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] simratcs:
Seriously Stop This ****... !!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Hetalk:
This statement is condescending to other sl9003 devs. Please retract.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Misledz:
Actually, we do have one, sleepless efforts from Adi & Dhiru have managed to get a working one all from scratch. It's a little disappointing how everything was handled, from both the moderators and HB's side. I had hoped progress would arise instead we have more people liking the e-drama.

Not sure if they liked his post that he quit or because they liked what he said.

If anything this thread need not be closed since the development is ongoing by those two, rather if you were to close it, then maybe Dhiru and Adi can take control of this or a new thread.

Regardless, HB leaving makes no difference to me. It's just the "Reign" theory, where one king leaves, another shall take it's place.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Under03Ground:
Sir moderator we are not threaten of hb's lost. Infact we have a great and better developers. It's just that we look hillbeast as the last hope for the kernel 3.X. with all due respect to you sir, we still got dhiru and adi and devs like lolation and the others who still keeping our community alive. and I still believe that we can get kernel 3.x without hillbeast.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] mikef:
No, as it wasn't meant to be condescending and is true to the best of my knowledge. If dhiru1602 and adi_pat had been capable of producing a 3.0 kernel WITHOUT hillbeast's help then I believe they would have done so. This is not meant to degrade or be mean to dhiru1602 or adi_pat. They are doing the best they can, but hillbeast has more knowledge than they do which is why he was asked to come develop for this device in the first place.

If dhiru1602 or adi_pat would like to update my understanding on this situation please feel free. I will gladly retract my statement if you guys say that you are fully capable of developing the 3.0 kernel and that you never needed his help and you can do it without any further help from him.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
Why??? Do you think that I am recovery agent of galaxy SL community???

When hillbeast told us honestly that he lost his phone I had already said that we cant do anything. If he find out the phone then that will be a great news but if not then just forget about it.

But still many people keep on tortuting him on same point again and again and again and again and again......and so on...!! If u have any problem then you guys should have discuss with him just once or twice but whats the point in repeating & making him realising same mistake again & again!!! Thats why I had commented that "thread name should be changed......" I was pointing towards those members who were un-necessarily torturing him on that point. Anyway whatever happened now it has happened. We cant change it unfortunetrly
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] silentcontrole:
Dear moderator you really need a cold shower im sure it will update your understanding....

"just advertising"
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] shriom_manerker:
sad story !

its sad that the people who donated have completely lost every penny they donated !! and its odd how "MOST PPL"support hb even though he "LOST" the device and has "QUIT" ! his actions speak for himself ! now we all know that "recognized developer" doesnt really hold importance here in xda... it actually depends upon the person !! i cant believe the device is actually LOST ! i thought he just said it to keep noobs away from irritating him !
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Hetalk:
We need to understand that our knowledge comes from a very limited source(our brains). :D

Adi and Dhiru do have a capability to develop 3.x and are on track to do that. Only thing they lacked was UART support, and a lot of credit goes to hillbeast(thanks man), for his help in getting it set up.

Again, Dhiru or Adi don't need your certificate, in this case. Their work will show their capability.

You can retract your statement now, or be proved wrong later.

JMHO
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
Sorry to say but I think you should check all history of i9003 community. Dont take mee in wrong way. Actually its a friendly suggestion from my side :)

Dhiru, adi, & hillbeast are totally different developers with different capabilities. We contacted to hillbeast only because we were not getting any idea how to make a bootable kernel. But I am thankful to hillbeast because of him we come to know how to take logs with help of building UART. In earlier days only hillbeast had UART & that why we all had to depend on him. But now adi & dhiru have saperate UART with help of which they have done a huge...huge progress. And its final result we will all see in upcoming days. I am not saying that hillbeast did nothing. He did what he could. But now Adi & dhiru are capable to make a bootable, working kernel 3.0.