yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] Frostyeo:
Wow how you guys get so good battery? Even with 2 hours screen on you still have 80%? I would have 60% by then :/ is it because I have apps like whatsapp and instagram on?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] steffanyouyi:
Ori Samsung Firmware compatibility

Does it compatible with original Samsung firmware?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] cooldoc007:
wats changed in 1.5.3 and 1.5.3lm versions?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] SignalX:
mate, pls READ,

first line in feature's list in OP

if you use JB Leaked firmware you should use Siyah 1.6 versions, search thread for that

cheers
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] bclark:
From gokhanmoral.com

1.5.3lm version is the low memory version for those who experience video playback problems.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] EdgaBimbam:
damn amazing battery life on first charge cycle with 1.5.3

3:50hours surfing the net with wifi

30mins with hsdpa

1:30hours listening to music

sync on

brightness auto
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] rUmtifUsel:
I've tested it yesterday and it didn't work for me. :crying: Each time the flash drive gets mountetd by the kernel to /mnt/ntfs the system creates a new subfolder sdX1 (the X changes each time of mounting - first mounting it was an A, second time a B, aso).

After mounting I enter your command (thanks for this) to the app "Terminal Emulator". but after executing the command there is no echo... I've also tried to start with the command su. After su the app wants to get granted su rights.

I think that it isn't necessary, that your command gives an echo, so I've tried to generate a new folder with EsStrong on the USB flash drive, but that fileexplorer prompted me, that it didn't work (same result with RootExplorer). Where is my fault?!
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] Yank555:
SU rights are absolutely necessary to mount or unmount devices, sorry forgot to mention that (my terminal always starts in su).

Plus if the mount point is "/mnt/ntfs/sdX1", then you need to change the command accordingly each time :

mount -o remount,rw /mnt/ntfs/sdX1

To see all the mounted devices and their respective mount points just type "mount". The command above does no more that "remount" an already mounted device in read-write.

Though if the mount point changes each time, it won't be so easy to make an alias... maybe if the device stays the same (but doesn't look like it) ?

But this may be getting off-topic, maybe better PM me if you have further questions.

JP.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] hawkn:
So far I've got absolutely no problems running the new 1.6 beta kernel :)

Batterytime is great, performance is great, everything is great :)

I'm running it on OmegaRom v23 JB release, and it's even more smooth than with DLI5 kernel that is stock :)

I'm really going to use my F5 button more often now ;)
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] EdgaBimbam:
even if battery life or performance would be bad it isnt fault of gokhanmoral. Atm he just applied audio tweaks. ;)
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] GrimPivo:
About battery time - it's better than the stock kernel? How better?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
put a primitive cpu overclocking support to 1.6a5

I won't have too much free time to make undervolting and gpu freq modifications but those will be available as modules eventually.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] hawkn:
I noticed that no changes made...any changes :p

Sometimes I'm such a dumbass, I fixed permissions and cleared my cache, and formatted my int.SD and ext. SD yesterday, before that I got 12-14 hours max battery time, after that it was better, and off course, when I flashed this kernel, I have just seen that the battery time is great.

I just checked BBS, and saw that MediaScannerService deosn't run all the time as before my little operation.

Yes, I had a few corrupted mp3's, pictures and such on Int.SD, so ....my bad :p

Still, F5 is used every 10 minutes when I have the time to do just that :fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
I have published a little post to http://www.gokhanmoral.com/

I will update it when I add new features.

undervolting and gpu overclocking/settings are on the way.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] GrimPivo:
Well, thanks! Proper undervolting is only one what I'm waiting for JellyBean!
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] mattiadj:
I use auto killer memory and I use custom preset made by me. I can use up to 375mb of swap but often I have lags. So any advice?

Inviato dal mio GT-I9300 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] triffonovm:
Charging when in USB Host mode

Hi everyone,

I have a question that I think is kernel related and since Siyah is the kernel I'm using I decided to ask it here.

Before I got the Galaxy S3, I had a HTC Sensation XE. This phone doesn't have native USB OTG support, but a few months back it got USB OTG through a custom (Sebastian's) kernel. I immediately grabbed a USB OTG cable to try it out (I've always wanted this feature on my phone) and it worked like a charm. One caveat was that, since the phone wasn't designed to have support for USB OTG, it wasn't providing any power on the power pins of the USB cable and you had to connect external power using a Y cable (I had one lying around from an old external HDD) even for something as low power as memory sticks.

Now here comes my question. I think because of the fact that the USB port on the Sensation wasn't wired to provide power, there was this side effect that the phone would happily charge from the external power source even when in USB Host mode. I used this in a scenario where my phone was connected in USB Host mode to my GoPro camera to review the videos and power was provided from a 4xAA battery pack. Both the GoPro and the phone would charge while maintaining data connection, perfect. Now when trying the same with the S3, the phone doesn't charge even though there is more the sufficient power (tried it also with the wall adapter in place of the battery pack). Does anyone know if this is something that can be controlled by the kernel? Maybe an option in STweaks? This is a feature I would very much like to have. I can see so many scenarios for this for example when going camping (using a solar charger).

Edit: While doing a bit more digging on the internet I found this thread which makes me a bit more optimistic about this being possible: http://rootzwiki.com/topic/30615-can-you-charge-usb-host-mode-simultaneously/
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] Chillz88:
I tried to mess with the minfree values too.. had tried it on stock without and with swap and with 200mb swap.. and it did get slow for me too and sometimes got stuck sometimes.. so i have no idea too.. maybe try v6 maximum drive..its said that yoi can open around15 apps without it closing in the background.. but i dont have a lap for some time now.. so have to wait till i go to my friends..maybe try that and give me a feedback?.. sorry for the ot..
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] elloar:
I can not change CPU setting to higher then 1400 in beta a5

Edit: I can change it but it stays on 1600 all the time. I is that normal?

Thx @ gm
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] rezapatel:
Just wanted to thank Gokhan for the fantastic kernel.

The latest 1.5.3 so far has been extremely robust and the additional RAM seems to be really making a huge difference on the performance. I reduced the Zram to 150mb and so far what a combination!

---------- Post added at 01:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:52 PM ----------

My experience with swap wasn't good either, it really did slow down the device and I think at checkpoints where the data would be moving to and forth. Instead Zram option available on Stweaks has been working pretty wonderfully.

In addition, stopped using AKMO (Autokiller memory optimzer), instead now using the V6 script without the additional multitasking tweaks (which requires editing the services.jar file).

A few days and I am loving my device again ;)
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] DirkStorck:
If you would have some time and if it would be possible it would be great if you could add swap support. That would be awesome :)

Send from my Omega ROM powered SGS3 :)

---------- Post added at 11:09 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:06 AM ----------

I don't have any problems with swap at all. Before I had often launcher redraws . After I have installed swap script to use swap they have been almost gone.

After I have switched from Apex to Nova I didn't have had any redraws for a long time. So I would say swap did help.

Send from my Omega ROM powered SGS3 :)
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] EdgaBimbam:
with swap i have tested one thing. For example i have set 150mb and u can test if it is working in terminal emulator with typing "free" it shows how much left swap mb free. And when it was out of mb, phone started to redraw for a long time. So i prefer with no zram and swap.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] FadeFx:
Gokhan, did u read my post on switching memory config here: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=31521316

What u think about that idea?

–—–—–—–—–—–—–—–—

tapatalked from Galaxy SIII
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] hawkn:
I can change to 1600 but when checkin with setcpu, android status or any other app, they say 1400 max and nothing more. :cowboy:
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] rUmtifUsel:
I've remounted my USB Flash device in RW mode, but I am not able to write to the NTFS formated flashdrive.

Can anybody help?

app_236@android:/mnt/ntfs # mount

/dev/block/sdg1 /mnt/ntfs/sdg1 fuseblk ro,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,allow_other,blksize=4096 0 0

app_236@android:/mnt/ntfs # mount -o remount,rw /mnt/ntfs/sdg1
app_236@android:/mnt/ntfs # mount

/dev/block/sdg1 /mnt/ntfs/sdg1 fuseblk rw,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,allow_other,blksize=4096 0 0

app_236@android:/mnt/ntfs # ls -l /mnt/ntfs/sdg1
drwxrwxrwx root root 2012-09-14 10:50 test
-rwxrwxrwx root root 0 2012-09-14 10:50 test_1.txt
app_236@android:/mnt/ntfs #
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] chwads2k8:
maybe u all dne summat wrong. kernel working fine here even oc to 1600. quad score 6795
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] ahac85:
Any chance for you to.tell what settings you have in s tweaks?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] EdgaBimbam:
you can check my signature. Also i have removed some samsung stock appz, like allshare play and others which im not using.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] aegeuss:
Hard Swap Support Possible?

Hi Gökhan,

I would like to know if hard swap support would be possible to add without sources for JB please?

Regards.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] perilousx:
Does not work with CM10!
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] EdgaBimbam:
1.6.. siyah kernels works ONLY WITH SAMMY JB LEAKS!!! ^^
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] rUmtifUsel:
One small addon to my question in post 5830...

Has someone with this kernel allready used an USB OTG cable to connect a USB flashdrive (NTFS formatted), and was able after remounting the flashdrive in RW mode to create a file or folder on the flashdrive?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] hawkn:
I found a bug, and also a plausible fix wich I'm trying out now.

When using OTG cable and USB flash drive it all works, but after using status bar menu to remove the USB, I get heavy battery drain from UsbStorageUnmounter, checked with BBS.

I also found a site with a few others, wich is in italian or something, so I translated with google translate.

trying the tip now, and it seems to do the trick.

Use settings > storage menu and umount the OTG device from there, unplug the usb drive and then remove the cable.

http://translate.google.com/transla...al-processo-usbstorageunmountted.html&act=url

Kernel bug or ROM bug ?

Anyone else ? :D

P.S. also posted in OmegaRom JB forum for SGS3 and I'm able to read/write NTFS sticks.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] FadeFx:
If it works from menu, but not from dropdown its clearly a rom bug I'd say.

–—–—–—–—–—–—–—–—

tapatalked from Galaxy SIII
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
yes, I normally read all posts on this thread :)

samsung jb kernel has already increased RAM without decreasing those values.

and I don't want to make such a change.. imagine the number of messages from people asking the optimum settings, complaining etc...

if AndreiLux's values also work on Samsung ROM I may make a little modification to make them effective on Samsung ROMs only but not on cm10. but making them configurable? no :)
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] simba4:
I cannot assign ringtones from internal memory is there a solution or it is rom based issue? Actually it is assigned but the phkne plays the stock assigned sound from the android sound menu.!
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] EdgaBimbam:
rom based
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] kilian7th:
Try ringtone extended from playstore
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] dannyc93:
Anyone know the changelog for alpha 6 from the first alpha?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] jody2k:
Welcome back gokhan ;) not that you where gone offcourse. Anyway thanks for this jb leak kernel! Just what I needed
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] tolis626:
Woah...I'm confused...So what did you say the best values for memory were?And where can I set them?I don't see them in STweaks.Maybe I have to use ExTweaks?Please help!I need these badly! :p

Just joking.But I personally believe that making the config ROM sensitive is going to draw the same amount of idiotic posts to this thread.You know,CM guys whining because they didn't get increased RAM,Samsung users who have ROM-related problems saying that RAM tweaks are to blame etc.There's no escaping it.So I'd place my vote in doing your stuff the best way possible.I won't judge whatever you do.And I think non of us who posses an iQ(Innuendo here?Maybe...) higher than that of an ape will.Leave the idiotcare to us if you choose to do something...Well,that will attract stupidity here. :)
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] jnr21:
Is there alpha 6 somewhere?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] jayden2009:
I hope !! alpha 5 running great so far at fullspeed :highfive:
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] ahac85:
Getting great battery life, but does it use all 4 cores?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
I am testing v1.6a6 now.

it has cpu undervolting and bus undervolting support.

I am planning to remove 100, 1500, 1600, 1704 and 1800 steps from the sources. I am planning to make the 1400MHz step configurable, without having additional steps. when you overclock to 1500, 1600 or higher, the first or second closest steps are not used that much anyway.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] hawkn:
I did not get any OC with 1.6a5 any tips?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] Franc38:
I'm quite impatient to try this alpha 6.

One point, though. My experience is that out of the low freq steps, top speed AND the second top step are used often. Agreed, those below are almost never in use, but it would probably be better to keep a top speed and a second top speed, just below.

It probably relies on the rules for stepping up/down to/from top speed.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] hawkn:
2nd that
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] eric-filth:
In my opnion you choise was perfect.

Undervolt and with last step (1.400mhz) configurable is very good.

Enviado do meu GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] jnr21:
Alpha6 will be based on xxdli7 kernel?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] kp.nikhil:
is swap supported in 1.6a6?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] codo2003:
Device: Samsung Galaxy S3

Kernel: SiyahKernel-s3 (latest beta) w/

CPU: 200-1200MHz, Pegasusq, -50mV for all steps

GPU: 108-160-266-300-350MHz with -50mV at each step. touch gpu boost: step3

---------------------

That's your setting. Why CPU only 200-1200MHz?

You downgrade the CPU to 1200 from 1400MHz or what?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] MuertoKo:
Guess he does, I actually do it as well. I don't need those extra 200MHz and helps he device running way cooler

If so plan playing hardcore (3-4 hours at Nova 3) I usually DC to 200-1000MHz to be able to play all that time without any heating at all. Without the downclock you get a hotter device some times (until thermal protection switches the frequencies).

I tried it and I liked it :) worth a try imho ;)
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
for Samsung JB Leak users only:

I will upload v1.6a6 after I finish this post.

it has undervolting support but the undervolt interface is in /sys/class/misc/customvoltage.

it has 4 undervolting interfaces: Ezekeel's customvoltage, netarchy's UV_mV, AndreiLux's UV_uV and vdd_levels (I don't know who implemented this, so the credits to the unknown dev). since customvoltage and UV_mV interfaces are the same I only kept one of them in /sys/class/misc/customvoltage but both of them will be available when the sources are released for backward compatibility.

change your scripts or just use STweaks interface to undervolt all levels by the same amount.

lowest voltage level is 850mV until the sources are out.

Nstools (available on google play) can be used to undervolt cpu. it supports customvoltage interface.

gpu interfaces will be available in the next version, if there will be another alpha available...
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] .c0dy:
Hell yes. You are amazing! Thank you very much!

Have some beer on me xP

7RT85750B30988048
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] hawkn:
Sooo.....

say... Im running omegarom with the newest b6 kernel, no OC that is registered in setcpu or android status or any other app.

and I cannot UC either.

To be honest, after a day of heavy usage, I cant reslly say that I notice any big differences except STweaks availability,.....
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] jayden2009:
In st tweaks u can oc :eek:

I run 1600...hell yeah I notice difference :D

Verstuurd van mijn GT-I9300 met Tapatalk
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] bigr1979:
Thanks for the 1.6a6. So far so good for me. Best undervolt for me so far @1.6 is -50mv. Overclocking working fine here for sure (on latest LI7 foxhound)
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
soooo, just don't bother with flashing another kernel and use stock then...

this is your second post which you wrote without reading first. (in the previous one you said you cannot overclock while I have clearly stated that the step will be reported as 1400MHz but the performance increase can be tested by benchmark apps, just one line above of the settings you choose in STweaks)

and in this one, you did not read "nstools" part.

I can share my kernels with you but I am sorry that I cannot teach you to read. that part is up to you.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] Stivikivi:
I tried to choose 1.6ghz with NStools but it max 1.4. So only use Tweaks or how can I enable 1.6ghz oc?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] elloar:
All works for me like you wrote dear GM thank you.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] bigr1979:
Use the stweaks app to overlock to 1.6
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] Stivikivi:
Done, with the same setting you take @1.6 and -50 works!
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] elloar:
Just set it in steaks to 1600 you will not be able to see in setcpu or other cpuapps. but belive us after that you have 1600 max. just run benchmark and you will see.

I think you can also set undervolting for all steps in stweaks.

Correct me if I'm wrong guys.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] Stivikivi:
Benchmark results still the same :D

But when I try to undervolt GPU it boots 2 times and all stats are reset
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
who said that GPU settings work?

in contrary, I remember that I said they do not work.

I recommend you to wait until the release of 1.6 stable because it seems that you are one of those who complain without following the thread.

I will take these post more seriously after releasing 1.6 stable...

until then I will report every post complaining about alpha versions, starting now.

go complain in the other thread, please.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] Stivikivi:
Mate I did not complain, I only said what I found out, anyway gw!
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] bigr1979:
Now settled on 1.4 as seems to be running fine at a -100mv undervolt in stweaks.

Anything more than -50mv undervolt at 1.6 and it's reboots.

Tried NStool and tried to undervolt with that, tried to slide the 200mhz below 850mv (sorry i know was stated below 850mv not supported, found out the hard way) all sorts of crazy things, mad reboots and graphical glitches lol.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] Stivikivi:
I run @1.6 with -75 all fine
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] Tungstwenty:
Looks that there are multiple guys that could use the reading classes. Perhaps they can have goup classes so it comes out cheaper :D:D:D

No offense ;)
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] bigr1979:
Who are they then ?
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] GrimPivo:
Gokhanmoral, who am I to tell you to in your post, but would it be better to make a description of the beta-version in the first post? It cut off a lot of questions about this, as the practice shows. Not all, but still.

And thank you for your work.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] Tungstwenty:
All right! We have 1 more! :highfive:

:)

Read posts #5864 and #5865.
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] hawkn:
Im sorry to have bothered you!

No matter what you/people say, how much they read/do not read, you know and everyone else know that you are a great dev, and make good stuff, no doubt.

I'm not going to post any more in this thread, findings, settings, logs, ANYTHING because whatever people post, someone has the urge to be negative and gets a hard on being cocky about it !
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] zodiaxe66:
Actually it wouldn't matter much,as ppl don't read ANYTHING.for the 3 weeks ppl have complained about 1.5+151 and 152 didn't work on JB,even though it's stated clearly in big RED types on top of first post~~this kernel does not support JB leaks~~.

So most ppl shouldn't even use this alpha/beta release,if they don't/can't read the last 5 pages in the thread..my 2c
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] hawkn:
I know that one is aimed at me as well, none taken btw.

It's just that I don't have enough time to do anything more than work and school until next june, combined it's about 17-19 hours every damn day included driving to/from work and school :crying::eek:

---------- Post added at 09:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:42 PM ----------

Hail that !
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] naveediftikhar:
is b6 based on li7 or btuli1? or it just doesnt matter?

edit dun bother..i got the ans..GM awesome as usual dude..u truly are a legend...!
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] zodiaxe66:
If u don't have time read,then DON'T flash.simple. m8
[Galaxy S III Original Android Development] Erahgon:
I'm sure by now he gets the point. Please... just drop the OT stuff and lets get back on track here. Done.