yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] Itchiee:
While it appears to open without errors on the Galaxy Tab 10.1 with CM9 I cannot login due to my provider Bright House Network missing from the listings. I know BH does participate since it works with the other HBO.apk (1.4) I was using prior to this (With the close and reopen trick), and my Samsung LED has HBO Go built in that I can use as well. Although this apk said I didn't have the Amazon app store installed before it fully opened. So for me yes, and no... Perhaps a more updated apk will work in my situation with all the providers listed. Or someone can hack the HBO 1.4 apk to not be so judgmental.....

Thank you
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] MXPS:
Works great for me on the WiFi running CM9.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] donjay56:
Works perfectly on my P7500 unrooted.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] dmmcd:
Works perfectly on my SCH-i905 (Verizon 4G), stock, unrooted. Comcast is my cable provider.

Thanks! I've been waiting for this app, I have lag and buffering issues when going through the browser. This seems much better.

Flight of the Concords FTW!!
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] mrsbelpit:
Thank you so much. Now I can start the Wire without trying to struggle with their ****ty site through the browser.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] bbeelzebub:
I'm stock, unrooted and it works perfectly.

Now, I wonder what the chances of getting the Max Go app are too. I have all the movie stations on my FIOS TV, so I'd love to have more for the tab.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] Trv06kviper:
Was working flawlessly, now tells me I do not own the app and to install Amazon app store to login.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] da0ne:
try this
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] Trv06kviper:
HBO Go and all variations of the words don't come up in the search. It's like it doesn't exist. Had to get it via website and your suggestion worked, thank you.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] GameChanger:
HBO Go works flawlessly on G Tab P7510. Here is what I did to get it to work.

1. Download apk from op.

2. Open web browser from GTab, go to Amazon and sign in.

3. Download HBO Go. (It will say not compatible with this device. Do you still want to download? YES, DL it.)

4. Install apk.

There you go!
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] Trv06kviper:
Despite, my best efforts the app no longer works, it just fc's
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] Archangel:
Yeah I think they caught on and shut us down both of my tabs it fc's
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] GameChanger:
Are you sure you paid your bill. Lol

Mine is still working fine. My service provider is Directv.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] Archangel:
mine will work if I uninstall the app then reinstall it, but after a while it just opens then fc's
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] GameChanger:
Now my bro is having fc issues with his tab too. He is wondering if it has something to do with ics rom. He is going back to HC to check if it works. I will report back with an update.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] Trv06kviper:
Lol yea, I have Fios, it's the application. I noticed that it loads but it fc's right after it begins loading data from the server. I'm trying to capture the log to see what's going on(happens so fast it's hard to see). I've done clean installs and it responds the same for me. Starts, begins to load then fc's with message "Unfortunately, HBO Go has stopped".
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] Trv06kviper:
I'm using the latest AKOP with the newest Pershoot kernel. I've tried cleaning dalvik and cache, fresh ROM etc, same result. Was thinking about lucky patcher but I think it's being flagged server side (the man!).
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] bbeelzebub:
Mine is still working.

As mentioned before, not rooted, stock, followed the directions and just loaded up a movie with no problems.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Themes and Apps] oninesix:
mine works

Go to the browser login to amazon app store look up HBO go for kindel you won't be able to click download or free it will say not compatable just click buy with 1 click then follow the steps you won't be charged cause its free then it will say you now own the app install HBO go from the link on the first pig of this thread that's it your done
[Galaxy S III General] Bowsa2511:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/06/apple-calls-for-an-early-ban-on-samsung-galaxy-s-iii/

So here we go, they couldn't sue for design, and are terrified by the UNIFIED design, release, and success! Seriously, they're suing for some stupid "data-tapping" nonsense, and swear they invented voice actions.
[Galaxy S III General] spridell:
Here we go again.

The EVO LTE and One X all over again.

I hop the US carriers are ready this time.
[Galaxy S III General] JaZart:
They fear the new android.

That's all.
[Galaxy S III General] Ascertion:
Stupid apple. All the carriers are losing money on their annoying patent claims. All the us carriers should just stop selling apple iPhone and applied would lose a ton of market share.
[Galaxy S III General] ricocollege:
Will they ever stop?
[Galaxy S III General] monkey28rb:
lol never going to happen...
[Galaxy S III General] LeviathanPT:
Their gonna spend the rest of their lifes just doing lawsuits to everything that has a button :D

We should tell IBM to make a lawsuit against Apple for making touchscreen smartphones, IBM SImon was the first !
[Galaxy S III General] twoashj:
Not too surprise. We already knew it from HTC EVO 4G LTE.
[Galaxy S III General] Bowsa2511:
Even the data tapping, how was that even patent-able!??
[Galaxy S III General] ckochinsky125:
whats new with apple. I guess they figure they can't keep doing minor upgrades expecting to steal android customers when Samsung, htc and the likes are coming out with bigger, better devices and the isheep are beginning to see the light on the horizon and the great potential android has and is becoming better everyday version.
[Galaxy S III General] speedyjay:
Apple seem to think they own everything....little does everyone know....samsung make the NAND for the i**** and the display....if I were samsung id say "**** you....make your own ****" lol
[Galaxy S III General] vinnyjr:
I wonder what Apple would do if Google said just **** it and stop their G-mail and their maps from being used on their OS. Maybe that would keep Apple from sleeping on the court steps. Just thinking out load.
[Galaxy S III General] skrambled:
Well, you had to know this was coming. S-Voice does sound exactly like Siri. Needs more cupcake answers to crazy questions though.

But seriously, Android has had voice commands for a long time before Siri. Maybe it didn't talk back to you, but at least if you said "Search for XXXX" it would just go ahead and do the search without some dumb robot lady saying, "Do you want me to search for XXXX?"

I watch my wife try to use Siri and the app becomes more and more useless every day. Almost every answer she gives now is "Would you like me to search for the answer to that?" Then my wife tells Sirii to go f#$% herself, and Siri says "Now now, that's not nice" lmao :D
[Galaxy S III General] speedyjay:
Or if samsung said "we're not making your nand or displays anymore" they'd be up **** creek....wankers! Lol
[Galaxy S III General] omersak:
No, apple did not invent voice actions - but really, samsung didn't have to make s-voice look like such a blatant rip-off of siri - right down to the glowing mic.

Just saying that it could have been designed differently.
[Galaxy S III General] leftheodo:
I think it has something to do with those 9 million preorders of this beast! Apple used to be a great company until the stopped innovating (after the 1st iphone) and throw all their money to lawyers!
[Galaxy S III General] SlimJ87D:
I'm sure Samsung knows what they are doing and prepared for this. They've been sued by Apple already, and making the SGS3 I'm sure they knew what they were doing when they made S Voice, etc.
[Galaxy S III General] Ascertion:
What is data tapping? Do they mean toggling it?
[Galaxy S III General] americasteam:
I just sold my iPhone 4 on eBay yesterday. I'll be glad when they pay for it so I can ship it and get it out of my house. What a bunch of losers. :mad:
[Galaxy S III General] Zabalba:
When you tap on information that has a hyperlink and then it asks what do you want to open it with.
[Galaxy S III General] Gadgetz:
Well thank you for bringing those things to my attention, I was not aware. However there are still some fundamental issues that would still prevent me from making the switch. This thread is not about that so I'll save that for another time. Maybe we can discuss this further and figure out if GPM could be an option after all.
[Galaxy S III General] paintball23456:
im using mobile browser since i dont have the xda app :D swype key board is ****
[Galaxy S III General] blackguy101:
I really have to admit that im getting scared here. Ive been looking forward to this phone for a very long time and I myself (much like everyone else here) would be very disappointed if this phone gets delayed/banned. Im not a patent export or anything but does apple have a legit case here? the one thing im scared about is that since im getting the Verizon varient of the phone that means that since it comes out later apple will have more time to do their dumb voodoo crap with it =( So ya what are the odds that this thing REALLY will get banned?
[Galaxy S III General] Gadgetz:
No idea on the odds, but i'm certainly concerned about it getting delayed/banned too. Not losing any sleep over it but it would be disappointing
[Galaxy S III General] neyenlives:
Even if you got it before the ruling, and even if Samsung did take out features, you would still get hit with it since they would simply push the changes out via OTA update.
[Galaxy S III General] blackguy101:
Well i thought that and i figured that in all honesty i could live without s voice like seriously half the people that have an iphone only uses siri as a party trick but the entire data tapping thing does suck =/ i guess my next question is cant we just wait for custom roms to come out and not take the OTA updates? or will that not be as easy as doing it on the galaxy nexus?
[Galaxy S III General] neyenlives:
my personal opinion is the data tapping part of their claims will disappear because it's one of those features that is considered to be essential to any mobile device.....in other words, one would reasonably expect to be able to click on any text that appears to be a url or clickable text and expect your device to forward that url to the browser......that's not something you would only expect to work on an iPhone. ....and i think they will rule as such. Not sure on SVoice. I don't really understand how it's any different than the voice google search that is already integrated into every phone running android. That's the thing with these claims. They have to convince the judge that these features are unique to the iPhone/iPad devices and from what I have read the things they are complaining about would and should be considered a standard feature of all mobile devices.

as to your other question, undoubtedly yes, you can stay on custom roms and never take an OTA update, many people do just that, as do I in most cases :)
[Galaxy S III General] thebobp:
Well, you're probably kinda saved by the carriers' slow updates here.

And yes, custom roms bypass the whole update thingamajig, and are sure to put it back in.
[Galaxy S III General] blackguy101:
Ok you have really calmed my nerves with this one haha. I know nothing is set in stone but i guess from your stand point it kind of seems as if everything in fact WILL run on schedule or we can at least hope so
[Galaxy S III General] Tomatoes8:
I would actually give Apple mad props if they used some of their profit for once and put the A6 in the iPhone 5.

The iPhone 3 used the A4 in the iPad which effectively made development costs free, since they already absorb the cost of designing the A4 when designing the ipad. They did exactly the same with the iPad 2, most of the development costs of the iPhone 4s was already taken care of when they designed the A5 for the iPad 2.

Now that they can't really use the A5x in the iPad 3 they have to come up with something or just use the A5 again but under clock it less. I would be impressed if they used the A6 though because no IPhone has ever introduced their new SOC. usually it was the iPad first and then underclock the iPad SOC for the iPhone. Their profit margin if they used a new SOC for the iPhone 5 would be considerably less than their iPhone 4s profit margin if this was the case.

I still don't think Apple is this generous though. I am guessing Qualcomm S4 or A5 that stays at 1ghz instead if being underclocked to 800mhz.
[Galaxy S III General] Artimus009:
It'll be on schedule. I have referenced my magic 8 ball and it says "signs point to yes"
[Galaxy S III General] neyenlives:
please take my post with a grain of salt and understand it is my opinion and I have zero background in legalese

I do know there is such a thing as the common sense test in patent law and that the judge can make a determination that the thing they are trying to file a claim against is something that, if enforced, would make it so it would be impossible for anyone else to make, in this case, mobile devices. It would be like patenting the channel up and down buttons on a TV remote and then once everyone has tv's out, suing them for using channel up and down buttons. How the hell else is someone supposed to change the channel?

I think if common sense prevails this will go away. There is a chance they scrutinize it far enough to where the judge will say a tiny aspect of Samsung's implementation is infringing and they need to change that part. So in the end the feature remains but perhaps the look of the GUI changes so that it doesn't come off as copying Apple as much.

Look at the Galaxy Tab case from Germany. In that case they slightly tweaked the bezel and speaker location....and then things were business as usual.

http://www.fosspatents.com/2011/11/samsung-relaunches-modified-galaxy-tab.html

I expect, if this doesn't go away completely, that it will result in a minor software or name change that will not affect launch.
[Galaxy S III General] simollie:
errr, have channel left and right buttons? :p
[Galaxy S III General] mercado79:
While your comment makes sense, that doesn't mean it'll go down that way.... Case in point, HTC lost their case on the same data tapping patent back in December (its what caused the delay last month). Hopefully different judge = different outcome.

Sent from my Nexus S
[Galaxy S III General] nithin82:
Samsung cannot backoff deal..there will be agreements between companies...penalty may be huge
[Galaxy S III General] Mooem7:
Disclaimer: Not a patent lawyer or expert, just going off from what I've read...

The thing about the unified search is that Apple is not necessarily going after Samsung just for S-Voice but the Quick Search Box in general (hence why they're trying to add it to the Galaxy Nexus suit which has no S-Voice). I personally rarely use the quick search box or any type of unified search, but it would be most unfortunate if that were removed from Android as a feature since I know there are quite a few that do.

Apple is attempting to gain a temporary restraining order against the GS3 since they are asserting the unified search (quick box) and data tapping patents. Remember that the ITC had already made the data tapping patent valid which I'm sure will weigh in on the judge's decision. I believe I read somewhere Samsung has to produce the source code for their unified search and data tapping features by Tuesday or Thursday to prove there's a enough difference between the Galaxy Nexus and the GS3 as to not add it to the current lawsuit. Needless to say things are looking bleak if those were pretty much untouched from AOSP. :( There are other factors that Samsung will try to bring up to differentiate the products, but who knows if the court will buy it. Hopefully the judge has some sense in this whole mess.

But anyways, with how broken patent law is in the U.S., I'm not ever feeling optimistic (the Oracle case was a nice surprise!).
[Galaxy S III General] mrvirginia:
well, i can tell you now with certainty that if it doesn't get delayed for release then the next shipments will be delayed until Samsung at least changes the data tapping. the HTC phones recently getting delayed at customs is proof of this and they had actually changed the software so that they weren't in violation of this patent.

maybe they will be allowed to just push an OTA that will change it, but who knows. really trying to get in for the pre-order, regardless, because things are about to get messy.
[Galaxy S III General] neyenlives:
I don't know about you guys but I am buying the GSIII primarily for the hardware, secondarily for the software. The first solid custom rom out is going on mine, and Apple can suck it, it will have whatever ingredients the cook decides to use, so for me it's a rather moot point.
[Galaxy S III General] krabman:
To be honest much like siri I find the svoice to be an interesting and fun diversion but its staying power was about 15 minutes as it was for siri. I have it frozen now and will likely uninstall it given a little time.

As to keeping svoice on custom roms or installing the apk after the fact it should be kept in mind that it does not work without connecting to samsung servers. If they are ordered to take those down (which is one possibility) then having the apk is meaningless. I am in no way saying this will happen just pointing out that the possibility exists.
[Galaxy S III General] neyenlives:
True. I don't use the voice stuff anyways.
[Galaxy S III General] mrvirginia:
ditto. i couldn't care less about SVoice, to be honest.
[Galaxy S III General] nicholaaaas:
OTA? What's that?
[Galaxy S III General] dante2512:
Over the air. It's how they push out official updates.
[Galaxy S III General] blackguy101:
Wait im kind of confused about something. From my understanding the ban on the htc one x by apple was carried out some time in december if im correct then why did a few shipments still get out in stores then? If im correct once they were out of stock thats when there was a huge delay until they got a huge shipment in. So i guess my main question is lets pretend that the ban on the gs3 did carry out isnt there still that slight possibility that that the people who pre ordered are going to get the first shipment before anything happens?
[Galaxy S III General] Bowsa2511:
They definitely need to make data-tapping "standard", or find a way to negate it, since We've had data-tapping before apple on other platforms.
[Galaxy S III General] simollie:
I'll also put on a solid ROM and never look back. However, the concern is that the dispute of software features may delay the delivery of hardware.
[Galaxy S III General] simollie:
At WWDC, Apple played a video featuring Siri trying to be funny. And she nudged Samsung saying "I am looking forward to the new Samsung... the refrigerator.". Besides it not being very funny, I think it's actually pretty stupid that Apple did this. Only shows how scared Apple is and reminds people of their biggest competitor.
[Galaxy S III General] nicholaaaas:
sorry... I forgot "/sarcasm "
[Galaxy S III General] blackguy101:
Im sorry but how the flying f*ck do they have the balls to make this joke when they are trying so hard to get it banned? That is terribly distasteful
[Galaxy S III General] g2uzer:
http://rootzwiki.com/news/_/article...rt-1-copycats-who-dont-want-to-be-copied-r870

i thought this was a good article, tells you how crapple copies but then turns around and tries to sue every one else for doing it, DAMN BASTARDS!!!!!!!! i just hope they don't get away with this and delay the release date.
[Galaxy S III General] sjdean:
I see Apple are touting such legendary new features exclusive to Apple that only Apple have in iOS6 - "FaceTime" (or 3G Video calling over cellular), Facebook status messages in Contacts, being able to share photos to Facebook right from your picture gallery, being able to share your photos with select people...

Err, welcome to two years ago??

And with their new rip off of latitude, err, new exclusive, Apple only mapping product, check this, you can share your location with your friends!

They copy others claiming it to be "evolution", but when others evolve in a natural progression, they have the gall to sue for copying!

I will NEVER buy an iPhone. I'd rather be phoneless than buy an iPhone. In fact, I will never buy an iPod. When mine dies, I will get a bluetooth adapter for my car to stream music from the phone.
[Galaxy S III General] Vibrant03:
when iOS6 comes out.. will we see more lawsuits from apple?

LOL
[Galaxy S III General] kulzboy:
if you sir are in my situation, you would be crying lol. I broke my original galaxy s by smashing it on accident (glass didn't crack, only the samoled). I'm in a strict spending environment and was forced to use an iPhone that was given to me for free. coming from cyanogen mod and miui, this is a torture lol
[Galaxy S III General] theraffman:
Ios 6 also feature this revolutionary feature that will allow you to refuse a call and send a text... They truly are on the cutting edge... /sarcasm

Seriously though, how long before they try and sue someone for stealing this new idea... A few years before they even said anything about it. Apple is a discussing company, primarily for their hypocrisies, they have stolen countless ideas, swooped in and patent snatched countless patents, but they are one of the most aggressive companies when it comes to patent infringement.

They have lost all innovation and are just a rich bully in the school yard trying to steal everyone eldest home work and pass it off as their own. I can't wait for the day that the majority sees them for who they are... A leech and anchor to the tech industry.

It is sad though, cause they were once a catalyst in the tech world and they brought a lot of attention to mobile platforms, its a shame that they became part of the problem instead of the solution.
[Galaxy S III General] Vibrant03:
apple is a company full of lies and deceit... uggghhh.. LOL

i hope they don't claim that iOS6 is "revolutionary"..
[Galaxy S III General] EnderXXI:
Muahahahah. Especially the second and third to last paragraphs.

Good read.
[Galaxy S III General] Michael_P:
It's Apple's fault for putting all their eggs in the IPhone and having to use underhand tactics to slow the competition with constant attacks, and I'm just patiently sitting back watching the IOS market share being eroded away as Android grows and people slowly see what greedy sh**s Apple really are.
[Galaxy S III General] blackguy101:
So i just realized something. Isnt tomorrow the day we find out if this bad boy gets banned/delayed or not?
[Galaxy S III General] archtech3d:
Why tomorrow? Did they announce a day for a decision? Ugh... I hate Apple.
[Galaxy S III General] kulzboy:
it's when they get together and show their proof. Samsung will have to show the source code and prove its original. Apple. Well, they will be bsing
[Galaxy S III General] robotohshs:
heres more information

http://www.fosspatents.com/2012/06/apple-and-samsung-agree-on-tuesday-and.html
[Galaxy S III General] blackguy101:
Wait if all samsung has to do is prove relating to those two patents how its diffrent from the galaxy nexus then wouldnt it be easy for them to do that?
[Galaxy S III General] Vibrant03:
i wonder how the new iphone looks like.. probably looks like the iphone 4 just bigger.
[Galaxy S III General] Totòòò:
Never got it why u ppl give a crap about their lawsuits...unless u r a stockholder in these companies
[Galaxy S III General] thebobp:
It's not only the stockholders who suffer; these lawsuits take money away from R&D as well. (Unless they're like apple, with minimal R&D costs already vastly eclipsed by profits.) Thus, they compromise the company's innovation and in the long run, hurt not only the consumers of that brand, but (through reduced competition) all consumers.
[Galaxy S III General] Mooem7:
These lawsuits have the potential to ban products from sale and thus, out of consumer hands.

That's really the only reason I care.