yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] doki81:
Hi All,

first topic in xda as i am really hope someone can help me on this. I am still new to root process as previously was on iphone.

got my S3 2 days ago and i am pretty satisfied with the stock battery performance. i need to root my s3 due to i have to run vpnc for access company vpn.

i follow this guide xxx.theandroidsoul.com/galaxy-s3-root[/url] for rooting my s3 and i have perform Part 1 as per the guide and then i go to part 2 and only realize "sgs3-root-install.zip" file no longer exist. i have to stop doing part 2 step 2 as i cant proceed without the install zip file.

then i come across this xxx.theandroidsoul.com/cf-root-6-0-its-the-new-samsung-galaxy-s3-root-package-includes-cwm-5-5-supersu-and-cwm-manager-app/ and i start rooting my s3 with step 2 again which loaded 'CF-Root-SGS3-v6.0.zip' with odin to my s3 again.

could it be due to i have double loaded twice of the tar file to my s3 and it cause the battery drain on it? i fully charge the phone to 100% and i didnt even on mobile data and wifi...turn the phone to standby and after 3-4 mins my battery went down from 100% to 99%...how can i rectify this issue?

Thank you for reading my long article and sorry for the bad english ..
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] member68:
100% doesn't always mean 100%. Sometimes the internal battery readings are a little bit off. Unless the battery keeps going down as fast as before, there is no reason to worry.
[Off-topic] uisgdlyast:
So I've taken my fair share of physics classes and one thing I've always wondered about is how all the electromagnetic waves we're putting into the atmosphere are effecting anything? I read a story on birds flying into cell towers and cattle near them have birth defects/stillbirths. What about pregnant women? Remember, this technology is still considered pretty new and just recently has everyone started using it. What happens 200yrs from now?

It just seems crazy that we're pumping all this radiation around the world and up into the atmosphere and we're led to believe it doesn't cause ANY negative effects. This is ENERGY we're talking about and obviously a lot of it. It almost seems like it HAS to be doing SOMETHING, energy escapes, not all goes from source to destination, so whats the escaping energy do?

So my concern is we're transmitting all this extra radiation into the air, cell phones use the same type of radiation as your microwave oven (granted, lower but your still putting that **** up to your brain everyday!). Is it not possible that other animals have the ability to pick up on different radiation like birds sensing the earths magnetic field?

Microwaves excite water molecules (how food cooks), so isn't it exciting/heating up the water molecules in the atmosphere? Can you imagine how insane things would become if people discovered cellphones are deteriorating the atmosphere?

What about the COMBINED total of all of it?? Is it not possible they are "charging" our atmosphere with energy? AND we know companies don't choose the most environmentally safest route, they use the most cost effective, so I doubt the frequency they use is because its safest, it probably travels the best or something.

People didn't know how dangerous radioactivity was, it killed Marie Curie and WE radiated our atmosphere with nuclear bombs to the point you have to correct for it in carbon dating (it made more radioactive carbon, isn't that bad? Isn't it cancerous beams shooting down at us?). What if we don't know the dangers of cell phones yet?

I'm curious if anyone has read any studies about this or are knowledgeable to provide more input on these topics, it seems like something that would be kept quiet. Physicists must agree on this, they know "shining" microwaves on water heats it up, so doesn't that happen in the atmosphere, even a little?
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
Oh god, if this existed, I'd really be in trouble.

Sent from my coffee pot.
[Off-topic] 85gallon:
I gots it covered.
[Off-topic] Pop Tarantula:
is this from the same school of thought as the 'ww3 = nuclear winter SO nuclear testing = climate change' theory?

That one says all the nukes dropped at once will push us off-axis & mess with the climate/seasons/weather in one feel swoop SO all the testing around the world is surely pushing us bit by bit by bit.

Where the f**k is Mulder?

Desire HD : CM7.2.0 RC3 : Tapatalk 2.1.3
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
Sorry OP, but these threads don't last long around here.

Sent from my coffee pot.
[Off-topic] Pop Tarantula:
Maybe it started out as just another government initiative to revitalise the employment market in the beauty industry and something catastrophic happened that they cannot admit to? I mean, just look how profitable beauticians & stylists like John Frieda (inventor of frizz-ease) have become recently, on the back of all the pain & suffering caused by random electrons floating around the atmosphere....

Desire HD : CM7.2.0 RC3 : Tapatalk 2.1.3
[Off-topic] wilbso:
OK, here's my honest truth I think about this.....what does it mean? I dont understand all of what this stuff means.

W!LßSO! @ XDA
[Off-topic] roofrider:
I didn read the post completely, but i know mobile phone radiations are possibly carcinogenic.

We all have cancer then...brain cancer.
[Off-topic] Blue6IX:
I'm just waiting for my superpowers to click in, wonder what I'll get?

Sent from a digital distance.
[Off-topic] realsis:
Tee-hee, yes we will all mutate , that explains the 3rd ear I have! I've been wondering where it came from! :)

Ha ha....
[Off-topic] Pop Tarantula:
Xray hearing, probably... this

Edit: from superpower thread

Desire HD : CM7.2.0 RC3 : Tapatalk 2.1.3
[Off-topic] thatdefault:
Enable airplane mode and use USB Ethernet cable for Galaxy Note. Problem Solved ;) . Newer phones are more efficient and emit less radiation that's why call quality is worse than old Nokia phones :p
[Off-topic] Babydollll:
Not really. I've been exposed to way worse crap than a little radiation. :cool:
[Off-topic] stamatis:
You may make fun of it but its true that many scientists tell that we shouldn't use phone more than 2-3min a month, yes 2-3min a month.

Generaly we are receiving electromagnetic energy from the sun but the extra electromagnetic energy and radiation from communication purposes its been supported that it can be harmful.
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
If one letter of that were true, I would be dead already, never mind all the cigarettes I smoke, and the 12 pack of beer I've put down every night for the last 10 years. I could give a **** about radiation, unless it's nuclear.

Sent from my coffee pot.
[Off-topic] stamatis:
It's not like you are being shot and you gona die from that, its can harm your ανο;σο;πο;ιητικο; (that's the thing that when you have a disease its trying to fight it and you can't have again that disease,sorry for bad english hope you understood), don't tell me that you haven't hear about cancer, radiation can cause canser and the proof are tthe people who have being exposed to it with the accident at Chernobyl.

About the alcohol and cigarets, if your telling me that those things are not harmful then....I have two thing to tell you

First your liver have so must nicotine that its color is like the material which put at the roads.

Second, two of my uncles have died at 40 and 45 years old from heart (how am I supposr to tell this "heart attack"?..anyway I thing you understand), and both were at the edge of alcoholism and were smocking almost every min of the day.
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
Dafuq?

I haven't worn a smock since high school art class.

Sent from my coffee pot.
[Off-topic] stamatis:
^^^^ here don't you say that you are smoking???
[Off-topic] xaccers:
Oh how I wish people paid more attention in their physics classes, or just learnt how to stfu about things they don't understand.

Microwave is a range of the electromagnetic spectrum, with wavelengths between 1mm and 1m, it is non-ionising radiation, so it isn't able to knock electrons off an atom (while UV, X-rays, Gamma rays etc are ionizing which is why they can damage DNA).

The energy levels used in MW communication is too low to produce any thermal reaction, even if they were used at the same frequency as microwave ovens (which they aren't as otherwise you'd not be able to use your microwave oven at the same time as your wifi, it's close but it's still a different frequency).

Consistently studies have shown that long term use of mobiles don't cause cancer as their radiation is also non-ionising.

Just as your 100W light bulb doesn't cause cancer.

MW ovens use approx 2.45GHz, GSM uses roughly 380-1900MHz so totally different to MW ovens.
[Off-topic] stamatis:
Generally you are right but long term use can cause problems, this part its not that clear maybe due to economical profits, but let me disagree with you, as I am not totally fool about phisics, and I have taken part in some lectures about radiation, I have hear many hard comments from physicists that talking about consequences from long term use.
[Off-topic] roofrider:
This is the first time i'm hearing something like that but then i haven't been researching on it.

I've always heard the opposite of that.

Possibly carcinogenic is all i know...but studies are not leading to a definite conclusion.
[Off-topic] stamatis:
Exactly, I totaly agree with you
[Off-topic] Babydollll:
I'm not making fun of, anything. I'm totally serious. Radiation is, the LEAST of my concerns. Also, dramatic much? If what your saying is true. Every person with a cell phone (especially geeks) for the last ten years would be, either hideously deformed from giant tumors of the head or dead. :rolleyes:
[Off-topic] roofrider:
Frankly, i'm more concerned abt the endangered species, deforestation n the damage done to the natural environment by some stupid homo sapiens.
[Off-topic] xaccers:
Then you should know the difference between ionizing and nonionizing radiation. Perhaps you also need to attend some biology classes too?

People in hotter climates are not more prone to cancer from the heat, nor are bakers, yet they are exposed to much greater levels of nonionising but heating radiation than the rest of us.

So you have people who are exposed to radiation that actually does cause heating (people in hot countries, bakers, chefs, firemen) that aren't getting cancer, but you want to believe that people exposed to radiation that cannot cause heating does cause cancer.
[Off-topic] Babydollll:
Edited because somehow the wrong, quote was quoted....

Also, you should be worried about many other things like deforestation, mining, fracking (I could go on but, I won't).....A few cell phone towers are the least of the environment's (and peoples) problem(s)

On another note....

You people slay me.

Here we are on a site dedicated to hacking $600+ devices and here you, are bemoaning the radiation you think causes cancer. Maybe, if your that worried about it.....

Why don't you, get rid of your phone(s) and get off xda???

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
[Off-topic] stamatis:
First of all let me clear this, its really difficult for me to speak about scientific subjects in engish and not in Greeks because my english are not that good but i will give it a try.....

Of course I know about ionizing and nonionizing radiation, but that doesn't have to do with the radiation from comunities but I see what's your point, the ionism is done in the upper zones of atmosphere (in greeks is ιο;νο;σφαιρα[you can remove the semicolons and google translate it] in english it should be sth like ionosphere?!) And thats like filtering sun radiation, in hot countries there isn't nonionizing radiation, nonionizing radiation there is with the τρυ;πα το;υ; ο;ζο;ντο;ς( in greeks is like ozon hole, in english I don't know, anyway the lack of ozon). I am not sure if the heat have to do with radiation, heating(maybe it has to do about frequency of the wave) is energy so it may have but that doesn't mean that long expose to a low radiation isn't harmful.

I haven't studie about this I just tranfer what I have hear from physicists

P.s.I am not obsessed with the radiation from my phone more likely I use it 5 or more hours a day...
[Off-topic] roofrider:
And i was puzzled!!
[Off-topic] stamatis:
That's really a stupid thing to say, but its my falt as I didn't set this clear, I am not trying to start war to cell phone industry, I love my phone I use it everyday and it is usefull as hell, its just that I transfer an opposite opinion about consequences....
[Off-topic] Babydollll:
No. It's not stupid. If you're that worried about it then.....

I'm being serious. There aren't ANY conclusive studies showing what you, say. Especially double blind studies. The, ones that MAY lean toward it being an issue either are inconclusive enough that, the data can be interpreted, many ways or is debunked in the next study. If it were A REAL ISSUE there would be, huge, warnings on phones, and they'd probably, be banned outright, in some places. My earlier point, stands. XDA, is a developer centric website/forum, dedicated, to getting the best out of our devices. It, isn't a place to debate the dangers of some, scientist/researchers imagination.

Also, #truthhurts

Don't get mad at me.,
[Off-topic] stamatis:
I am not geting mad at you its like you are getting mad at me, Its like you are seeing me like an obsesed guy and I am not!!!

You say there isn't any studies shows what I am saying, it's better to tell you haven't read amy study shows to what I am saying, It didn't came from my head it's fact what I have told, nothing sure about the consequences,I am not telling I am right for sure,I just express my opinion what's wrong with it?, remember when they were considering cigarette as a good thing, and they were telling there is nothing wrong with it but when people started having problems with it....
[Off-topic] xaccers:
You don't know the difference between ionizing and nonionizing radiation.

It has nothing to do with the atmosphere.

Ionizing radiation has the ability to knock electrons from atoms producing ions. Ultra violet light, x-rays, gamma rays are examples of ionizing radiation, which is able to damage DNA and cause cancer.

Nonionizing radiation such as UHF, VHF, MW, visible light, IR, are of the wrong wavelength to affect electrons hence why they are nonionizing.

The damage they can cause at sufficient energy levels is from burns by agitating molecules within a substance, hence how MW ovens work, 2.45GHz is the right frequency to cause water molecules to line up like iron filings in a magnetic field, resulting in heat being produced.

Mobile telecommunication devices do not use energy levels or frequencies which produce heating within a human being.

Even if they did cancer wouldn't be the result.

Just as idiots who use MW ovens with the door open don't suffer from cancer, they suffer cooked kidneys, eyeballs and testicles.
[Off-topic] Babydollll:
I said DOUBLE BLIND studies. As in the ones that neither the participants nor the researchers know who got what in the study. Any study can say anything it wants. Researchers can skew results in favor of what they are trying, to, prove.

"Believe none of what you hear and, only, half of what, you, see"

(or something like that)

And again, if it were a real issue and not some, researcher trying to cause a commotion, cell phones would carry warnings like cigarettes AT THE, VERY LEAST.
[Off-topic] stamatis:
Well I agree with you but science can't be this way

Scientists must make their conclusions after the experiments/studies and not before. And I don't think it is this way...
[Off-topic] 85gallon:
Mod edit: Post something like that again and I'll be having words in private with you. My patience is almost gone.
[Off-topic] Babydollll:
Of course they make conclusions AFTER the study. However, data must be interpreted and, humans interpret the final data and can skew results either consciously or subconsciously.....

Edit: researchers, sometimes do studies because they think a certain result will prove something they think.

As in: I think gravity exists at a certain rate/speed and im going to drop different things to PROVE IT.
[Off-topic] stamatis:
I know that, in the example you said ionizing of noninozing radiation of the sun its being done in ionosphere.
[Off-topic] Babydollll:
Listen, if you believe cell phones may cause radiation that's your prerogative. However, arguing every single opposing viewpoint (however wrong, you think they are) is getting tedious. Not only am I done debating this but you need to, accept proof that what your saying, HAS NEVER BEEN DEFINITIVELY PROVEN.

Buh bye nao
[Off-topic] stamatis:
Sure but if that they think don't deing approved by experiment they can't say it is being approved anyway because they think is right...
[Off-topic] xaccers:
Now you aren't making any sense :)

I wish I spoke Greek (although my astrophysics degree does help with reading Greek menus :) )
[Off-topic] stamatis:
You are right I am arguing any post and I should stop, but it's like you are attacking me for having different opinion

Yes I dont know if they are approven.

AND NO I AM NOOOOT SAY THAT WHAT I AM TELLING IS CRAPS BECAUSE IT ISN'T , I HAVEN'T BRING THEM FROM MY MIND I HAVE HEAR THEM FROM PHYSICISTS.

I like the chatting and the arguing, I think its good to there are different opinions

Bye
[Off-topic] stamatis:
I wish I could speak better english...can you google "ionosphere and its role" or sth like that because I really want you to understand what I am saying
[Off-topic] stamatis:
I am not that much woried how many times do I have to tell it?

Of course there are things much more worring
[Off-topic] Archer:
Or cool, depending on how you look at it. What do you think Hulk?
[Off-topic] roofrider:
How can u be so sure abt that? I'm certain research does not say that.

Long term use? Today 12yr olds use mobile phones.
[Off-topic] Babydollll:
No. What I'm saying is that you are trying to convince everyone else that because there are studies that have been done regarding radiation that It's ABSOLUTELY true that cell phones cause health issues and it isn't true. You won't even accept that studies can be flawed. If you believe it, fine. I don't and won't until it's absolutely proven like how it's been proven that cigarettes cause cancer.

You've heard it's been studied. No one has proven IT'S TRUE.
[Off-topic] roofrider:
There are myths.

But that does not mean they are harmless.

Frankly, i laugh at people who say mobile phones cause cancer and asks me to avoid using them whenever possible.

But at the same time u cant simply eliminate the possibility of it being carcinogenic.
[Off-topic] roofrider:
Oh.

Then i strongly suggest u to submit a paper/thesis/whatever to whoever responsible and be awarded a Nobel Prize. And end this nonsense. The world will be a much better place to live then.
[Off-topic] xaccers:
Because they are nonionizing! Electromagnetic waves with a greater wavelength than UV are unable to knock electrons out of atoms, which is what causes damage to DNA.

For stamatis, the Sun produces a wide range of electromagnetic radiation from low frequency radio waves to high frequency gamma waves.

When the radiation of UV wavelength and shorter hit the atoms in our atmosphere they knock electrons out leaving them as positively charged ions. The Earth's electromagnetic field affects these and holds them in the ionosphere.

---------- Post added at 02:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:07 PM ----------

Do you want to borrow my wall to bang your head against? :)
[Off-topic] roofrider:
So, why are there so many 'idiots' out there wasting their time on conducting various researches and tests.

While high school knowledge can put it to rest.
[Off-topic] Babydollll:
No one (at least not me) are calling researchers idiots. Only that studies done to date are either:

inconclusive

or

it's highly unlikely (I won't go as far to say false because more data may change things in the future)

Until either of the above changes. I'm firmly in the "bah humbug" camp.
[Off-topic] roofrider:
That is all i'm saying.

Just like how Newton was dethroned by Einstein.(Now don't start a debate on this pls)
[Off-topic] xaccers:
Because most people don't have high school knowledge, even those who went to high school and the researchers get to keep their job by regurgitating the same old thing while the media sells newspapers by scaring people into thinking they might get cancer.

Look at the number of studies that needed to be done to show the MMR vaccine didn't cause Autism, and even then the only thing that shut the media and paranoid idiots up was when it came to light the original researcher was in the pocket of a competitor.

Let me tell you about McDonald's in the 70s, they were plagued with rumours they mixed garden worms in with their burgers to save money.

No matter what they said the media kept the rumours going, until the CEO pointed out that worms cost more than burger meat so it would cost them more not less.

The media and conspiracy nuts couldn't argue with that and the rumours died.

Any sensible person would know straight away that worms weren't being added, but large numbers of people believed the rumours.
[Off-topic] 85gallon:
Apparently someone found my post offensive. We do not have a right to go through life without getting offended over something. You can post one word and someone, somewhere will eventually be offended by it. You can't please everyone.

My post was within the rules as written, but they appear to actually be fluid rules and not concrete. I don't desire to aim at a moving target. I prefer them to be stationary and consistent.

With that in mind, I will stop responding to anything that offends me and merely report the post as offensive.
[Off-topic] roofrider:
I dont think anyone reported ur post.
[Off-topic] Pop Tarantula:
I'd like go so far as to say the researcher that cooked an egg while calling his 2nd cellphone for over an hour just to prove a point seems a bit of a dumbass IMO. I don't know anyone that would actually call themselves and hold a conversation with themselves, thereby justifying the scenario.

If a single cellphone cooked it, that would be valid data for the real world.

Desire HD : CM7.2.0 RC3 : Tapatalk 2.1.3
[Off-topic] stamatis:
This is way out of constructive convarsation, and don't be that mad, sun its at the safe zones of waves but so many doctors say don't be exposed to sun for hours...

Isn't this what its called ionization??

Ιο;;ντισμο;;ς
[Off-topic] Babydollll:
I said the same thing. :eek:

The possibility of this being proven in the future is well....very possible. (science and research have limitless possibilities)

All I'm saying is it hasn't been proven to date and I'm not worrying about it....

---------- Post added at 09:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:39 AM ----------

:confused::confused::confused::confused:
[Off-topic] roofrider:
Ok,

The mobile phone technology that is being used today does not cause cancer.

However "A recent study showed that when people used a cell phone for 50 minutes, brain tissues on the same side of the head as the phone’s antenna metabolized more glucose than did tissues on the opposite side of the brain. The researchers noted that the results are preliminary, and possible health outcomes from this increase in glucose metabolism are still unknown." It does have some effect but not cancer.

That is why long term studies are being undertaken...not just conspiracy, i refuse to believe that here.
[Off-topic] stamatis:
I surely don't want a gamma wave on my skin :p
[Off-topic] stamatis:
I think we have tell enough, everyone have his opinion about an non approved subject, and every opinion is respectfull, lets just stop it!
[Off-topic] blade30p:
I guess I'll be ok then, coz nobody ever fones me & I have no friends.
[Off-topic] stamatis:
Thanks for your time and info you shared

all i was asking is if that you described is the ionization...
[Off-topic] xaccers:
You're welcome :)

As long as you understand that ionization doesn't just happen in the ionosphere, it happens wherever ionizing radiation (radiation that has a wavelength the same or shorter than UV) knocks an electron from an atom.