yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] tprince1225:
No I wasnt joking you must not know your M&P's very well. A port that is damaged is not a $100 asurion claim. I bet you are sending people to asurion for evo charging ports too? Even tho under the battery/charging tab in eticket there is an Id code for charging port durability so even people with no TEP can get it replaced for free. Stores like yours is what makes people mad.

Here a what the eticket would be like.

Front office complaint: customer states phone is not charging.

Complaint: battery/charging - charging port failure

Submit to back office

Back office complaint: battery/charging - charging port failure

Back office notes: issue: port is not working duplicated: yes. Resolve: order an AE

I understand you have an AE budget but don't send people to asurion for no reason. That's why people hate us/sprint/service techs. Cause uninformed CS reps on the phone and in most stores.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Sunsparc:
I can fix E4GT charging ports, you can't? It's just a simple cable with the port attached. No soldering required.

I searched my entire M&P and there is no set M&P for the Evo charging port, only what's been instructed to us from our national manager and SRSS. If the copper pad is intact on the board, it's covered under the ESRP portion. If the copper pad is present on the underside of the port and has pulled loose from the board, it is covered under the ERP portion.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] tprince1225:
Umm idk if your getting your phones confused but the E4GT has a solder on charging port. I have one open in front of me. The EVO design has a ribbon charging port. And for the OG EVO open a eticket up and select battery/charging and the complaint will say Id then some numbers and then say charging port durability( I.E. ID3627 - charging port durability) that waves the $35 repair/replace fee for non TEP customers. Even the ones with ports off the board.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] afinch1992:
Thank you for the advice. I might drop it off at lunch and see what they can do and sweet talk them a bit
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Drjesus616:
if i remember correctly, the last time i processed an exchange through eticket - if you have a black E4GT the white is offered as an option ...

so if there is actually something wrong with your current phone, the tech shouldnt have a problem with clicking one button down and replacing it with a white one ...

i know i wouldnt, but im in chicagoland
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] jonapunk:
They told me rwo hours to took about fifteen min.... They did a hard reset and when that didn't fix it they gave me a new phone
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] kurtiskobain:
There's certainly no reason they shouldn't if you ask nicely, and if they don't when they give you their ready now shpeal express that you are not at all satisfied, and with a 2 hour wait they hardly seem "ready now".
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] puff601:
The last time i used tep i was told that i could choose white or black since they are the exact same models, different colors. It pretty much depends on who you talk to though
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Sunsparc:
It's available, but we can get dinged for it, since it's considered a non like-for-like exchange. Depends on how hard that reps SRSS is on them about exchanges. Mine says absolutely no, so I don't, to save myself.

http://www.durapowerglobal.com/Samsung-Galaxy-S-ll-Charging-Port-Flex-Cable-Replacement_p_4763.html

Just replaced one earlier today. My dealer orders a lot of stuff from Durapower, they send us brochures all the time.

I'm not arguing with you about the Evo charging port, only what I've been instructed. If it's wrong, it's wrong. I'm still getting paid for it and in good graces with my company. :)
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] tprince1225:
I understand fully, it just sucks that we all follow the same M&P's but different people enforce different beliefs (most srss are old school) and that's the issue. You don't happen to work for a united cellular retailer do you?

Idk what gs2 your repairing but that definitely doesn't go on the E4GT. Port is part of the entire circuit board
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] rrmzr1:
Im in Chicago trying to replace mine for a white one. Usb is damaged but phone still charges.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Sunsparc:
I do.

I just realized that I linked the international GS2 part, Durapower used to have the E4GT part up there but it seems not anymore. Sorry for the confusion. :)
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] tprince1225:
its all good but I still don't see how its attached to a flex lol
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] afinch1992:
Would that break the charging and data connection? I called the insurance company to make sure im covered now and asked around a bit. They said if you dont have either connection then its considered physical damage and I would have to file a claim and pay the deductible.

I'm not to this point yet, but Im considering it at this point
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] afinch1992:
Well that was interesting timing. My usb port is now acting up. I guess theres no need to take a screw driver to it, the damn thing broke on its own
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] Concordium:
So I am trying to the command line to flash TWRP to my phone via Fastboot. However, when I try to do it it says "Sending" and just hangs there. It doesn't actually flash the recovery image. As far as I can tell my bootloader is unlocked. I ran a root on my phone and my bootloader has the "Tampered" label on it when I boot into fastboot. Also, I downloaded the recovery file directly from Team Win's website. So I know the file is good to go.

Does anyone have any suggestions?
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] Evo_Shift:
Reboot everything and double check drivers. Other than that someone more knowledgable will have to chime in.
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] jdogg836:
Tampered signifies that you ran root. Underneath that message it will say locked or unlocked. If it doesn't say unlocked, then you need to rerun the process for the HTC unlock.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] makasouleater:
Hi i traded my phone, and he installed the wrong thing and broke it. I thought i could fix it which i did. Now though when i load it up it has no mobile network. I can connect to wifi. I called atnt and they said my imei was fine. I registered this phone with them when i first bought it, so i dont see how the imei could bad. I think he tried to change the carrier to something else and messed it up. Is there any way i can get my mobile network back? ITs a atnt i727. What should i be looking for to change the carrier to what its suppose to be. The imei is the right one from the back of the battery.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] xcrazydx:
Read more post less
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Jnewell05:
Try changing apn settings.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] makasouleater:
Isnt that for the data? I reset it to default but it didnt help. I cant make phone calls or anything. Is there a setting to tell the phone to connect to at&t or something like that? Or is there any way he broke the hardware? Under the settings about the phone it shows my phone number.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] makasouleater:
Thanks for trying guys. I have a update I got like one bar last night and it received like 4text and then got none. My girl friends phone is getting service, so does that mean something in the phone is broken
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] nrm5110:
More details on what he did to break it and what you have done to fix my guess is that you need to flash a better working radio
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] makasouleater:
Well when I got it back it was is a mode I haven't seen, kinda like the download mode but it said Odin kies mode. Im not sure what ics he tried to put in it. But I put back in the flash to stock Odin from the site and it loaded back up. Then I saw it didn't have service so I installed Cw recovery and installed sky coke. Which I have now, also tried some kernals but that didn't help ethier.now I have sky coke no service to atnt for calls or text but wifi works. I don't get service even in emergency mode.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] nrm5110:
Try finding a gingerbread radio FOR THIS PHONE and flash it my guess is that is your issue I don't have links but they exist somewhere in this noob ridden skyrocket forum
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] makasouleater:
Thanks very much, i tried that and it still doesnt work. Weird enough every once and awhile it works, it should like it must of dropped it in water or something, and bricked it on me so i wouldn't realize what was going on. Or am i wrong? Is the thing that receives and transmits cell calls and text able to brake hardware wise?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mdayjr:
What I would do is try a new sim card. All the network info is on there. If you did something wrong with roms or whatever, you could fry the sim. I would also make sure to have complete stock and I mean bone stock att rom( no root) placed on it. This will make everything back to factory and a better way to eliminate the problem. Sounds to me you have multiple and nothing meshing together. Search forums to return to stock which most likely would be gb 2.3.6. Good luck.

Oh and make sure you read closely and carefully. Returning to stock can be dangerous if you don't follow the directions step by step and have patience. You have nothing to lose if the phone is already borked. Its worth a try.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] JohnnyArcade:
I'm having the same exact problem. And unfortunately, it looks like it has something to do with the CM 10.1 itself. As CM 10 works perfectly fine and gets me a signal, CM 10.1 won't be able to get me services.

I don't think there's a fix on this yet.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mrfeuss:
I'm going out on a limb here and guessing you're on a different baseband than UCMC1.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] ozziedog:
Their is nothing wrong with CM10.1 if your using the correct radio. UCMC1 it works fine for me.:)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
I made this thread so people can discuss the addition to HCTLinkify and how it affects you and why it came into existance.

Background:

Apple has a patent on the way Sense (possibly Android 4.0) handles links on screen and how the user interacts with the touch input. Instead of trying to expalin the whole patent dispute I will let you read more HERE

The patent in question is HERE

This is also the reason the delayed Shipping of the HTC One X and the Evo 4G LTE.

Current situation:

HTC has circumvented the patent dispute with the use of HTCLiunkify which simply changes the way it handles the onscreen links. This has caused concern for some users because they feel functionality has been degraded. This is debateble.

My delimna:

Some, handfull of users, are asking me to remove this work around from my ROM and violate apples patended "link" technoilogy. I state that if HTC and Google, Sprint and ATT can be sued so cant I. Maybe this is an unreliatic fear but none the less quite possible.

My Answer: Im not removing at this time but may consider it in the future. ITs functioning the way HTC / ATT intended.

DISCUSS!

Talk about why Apple sucks or you feel this was a good ruling by the courts. Give me a valid reason to take this out of the ROM and risk Apple's wrath (Albiet prolly unrealistic).

More importantly tell me if it even affects you?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] mykeldrip:
Edit...hope this stop discussion in ur thread....see its open again...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Yeah, I didint want my thread to get embattled with the apple hatred / why wont you change this debate.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Turge:
I personally can't stand the half-ass change HTC implemented. When I was running your ROM, I spent a few hours trying to remove it.

The way it's supposed to work is when you click a link to YouTube, Google Play, Google+, etc., it's supposed to prompt you to use the app. If they can no longer prompt because of the lawsuit, they should just redirect the link to the app instead of the browser. Why would anyone want otherwise??

Here's a good example of how stupid it is. When I watch YouTube videos, it's usually from people emailing me a link, sharing it on Google+ or being embedded/linked in a web page. I seldom ever launch the YouTube app to view a video. With their implementation, the YouTube app is virtually useless.

Now, why does your ROM have to have it, but mine doesn't? Mine's obviously based on the Rogers RUU which never implemented the workaround because they didn't have to. But if you successfully removed all AT&T references, we would be left with virtually identical ROMs with different bases. Since your ROM isn't specifically made for US residents, why would that not be ok?

Anyways, discuss :D
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kravguy:
Is there a way to create a flashable mod to remove it so that the user takes responsibility and not the rom developer?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] mrjaydee82:
I like your way of thinking :-)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] tyshemi:
I hate the idea of keeping the htclinkify so keep up this way sounds good :D
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Good pioint...

BUT

...

My ROM is (phisicyally) hosted in the US and would therefore need to comply with all US Copright and Patenet laws.

And no... Im not going to buy a server outside of the country to circumvent this, lol
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Turge:
LOL.. anyone who knows me knows that I like to challenge things. When I'm told to do something, I do the opposite. (Well, within reason :rolleyes:)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] KitF:
Aren't you technically breaking copyright by modifying HTC's software anyway?

Unless somewhere they state that their Sense stuff is free to modify. They provide the source so that people can work use that for open-source AOSP. Sense, I believe (I could be wrong) is NOT open source.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Its not open source but HTC has differnt policies than Apple.

Ive never seen HTC Threaten to sue someoen.. Well once.. but that was because unreleased code was being released (IE LEaked ROMS for devices that were not even on the market yet). But other than that they given the "unofficial" greent light to making modifications to there product and distibute

We are called the "enthusiast community" and help sell there product. This is why HTC has created HTCDev.com. Specifically to unlock the pohones for the purpose of custom built ROMS / Mods, etc, no?

I am also part of HTC Elevate (elevate.htc.com <- Private boys club for HTC developers and vendors and HTC Staff to dicsuss HTC Products, give input, request changes to products) and will try to seek clarification. But HTC and Apple are two differnt animals all together.

If Apple opened up the bootloaders on iCrap devices I would agree with your point but honestly... Two differnt animals we are talking about.

Once the above issue occrued (releaseing unreleased code) HTC Made a statement at that time that it was ok to re-release the code as long as it was normally publicly available... IE Not Leaked code and definetlay not leaked for device that were not even on the market yet.

Search Google / XDA for this word "conflipper" You will understand then...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Also, I want to point out...

This is about Apple, not HTC. If HTC opens a lawsuit with me for making Custom ROMS then I am pretty sure all of XDA woudl be shut down, etc etc etc...

So lets not derail the Apple issue with HTC...

Its an Apple to Oranges comparison (Get it, Apple, gett it?)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Turge:
It's a little different, but I remember HTC asking the developers of Launcher Pro to remove their "HTC-like" flip clock from their launcher. I don't think they're bothered with all of the other flip clock developers since though since it might just have been a momentary lapse of judgement, or a rogue power-tripping HTC employee. Just wanted to point out that there is a little bit of history between HTC and developers.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
That is a dieffernt case though... But once again... This is not about HTC suing anyone, its about Apple.

Lets keep the discussion on Apple being the douceh bags, not HTC.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Spankly:
Me and a friend were thinking. Say for example when you go buy your phone. You pay an extra 20 bucks for the apple tech. Just a thought. And yes I understand that it still is an imperfect plan but everybody wins. We as consumers get what we want and apple gets there money for there code.

Edit

Hey I don't like to support apple either. But this whole mess hurts everybody including apple. Apple looks like a big jackass for suing over something so stupid and all the rest of the cellphone makers have to scramble to fix this while all of their product sits in the ports.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] tarick09:
Never ever support Crapple products.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] fitchpuckman:
Completely agree. I would prefer the links just opening directly w/in the apps, even if I dont get the luxury of a prompt. the apps are far better - and intended - for viewing the content that many of these links are referring to. I dont want XDA, YouTube, Facebook, Groupon, etc. all opening up my browser and viewing what is often a 'desktop' site as directed by the link. If I want that, I can just copy/paste the link into my browser, but I'd nearly always prefer that a link automatically went directly into the associated app. i'd support pretty much any method available for getting a damn link to open in an app that I already have on my phone and, therefore, presumably would rather use over the web version of the site. I mean, why else would the user have apps? To me, this is a prime example of where patent laws have just gone too far.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Actually this is a feasible busniess model! Did you know that Google has to pay Microsoft every time an Android phone is activcated due to patentes used by Google in the Android OS.

Microsoft was smart about it. Apple is just plain ****ing greedy. How many 12 year old Asian boys does it take to make an iPod.... Ask Apple they can tell you.

Google it... Goole everything I say. Its all true.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
To be honest with you man. Can someone explain to me what it even does differntly? When I click phone number in a text message it goes right to the phone.

What doesnt even work? Or work as expected?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Turge:
Well, the point was originally raised to ask "Where do we draw the line?".

I'm sure Cyanogenmod will never have to worry about Apple, so why should we/you?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] SmiLey497:
Today I clicked a youtube link, on my Nexus it would ask me if you wanted to use the youtube app or view from browser (and set the defualt), now it just takes you to a full screen browser to play the video.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Cyanogen is not violating any Apple patents.

He was however violating Googles Copyrighted work and they reaced an agreement to distribute the products seperately from the ROM.

If CM Was violating Apple's patent IM sure they would shut him down too.

Where do we draw the line?

Thats simple, in the Laws and regulations set forth in the US Code (USC).

Why do you feel we should ignore patent and copy right laws? Do you feel all laws rules and regulations shoud be discarded if the group of individuals creating an offense of those rules may seem innocuous?

(This is good debate! Lets keep it going!)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] V@no:
There is difference between copyright and copyright trolls. Apple is nothing less but copyright troll.

Every web link open in browser, instead of giving a choice if it's a youtube video open it in youtube app or a browser, if it's link to app on market website, open google play, if it's map link, open in maps app, not browser, there are plenty examples that are not only open links in browser.

So here is a proposal. If you know how to fix it, make a mod and I'll publish it as anonymous with no leads going towards you...on a server located somewhere in Russia...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Hehehehe... Now that sounds like a good idea.

All I can say is this... And think deeply about it...

What if they guys who framed the HTML standard copyrighted hyper links? Where would we be today?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] V@no:
Woah, woah, woah! don't give any ideas to apple...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
You got me there!
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] dkirchik:
Microsoft has that I believe?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] dkirchik:
To everyone wondering; Apple's link patent falls under intellectual property. I write music and edit music for various labels in the music industry all my stuff falls under Intellectual Property contracts and copyrights, so I know this law fairly well. Meaning basically what's Apple's belongs to them in every imaginative and concievable way. Now those patents only last for ten years then there's a grace year the apple has to retool it in a new way for apple to beable to maintain the intellectual property again. Saying that if Scott removes the HTC Link... Apple can sue Scott @ $12,500 per download of the ROM its attached too.

The company/person who owns the intellectual property, has always won the lawsuit.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] KitF:
If you can find a way to keep Linkify, but restore core android chooser functionality to URLs ONLY, that may get around the patent. I believe the patent only referred to phone numbers.

I just want the links to open in the apps they are supposed to! There is an API app devs hook into that is being broken here.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] JeepFreak:
I HATE the new work-around, I HATE Apple, and I HATE the bull**** patent laws that let you patent this ****!

Billy
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Can someone post me a youtube link that would normally ask you to open in what application or otherwise launch the application as described above?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Is this what you would expect to see?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kleeman7:
So this is why one US HOX we have the app association in settings and Canada version doesn't?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Yes. That is correct!
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Tiffany84:
Yes, that's how it use to look. Now it just opens the browser.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Ok, thanks.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
I have updated to CleanROM 2.5 Standard Edition.

I rebased it off the 1.88 RUU....

You do the math!

-Scott
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] tyshemi:
Very very nice
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Dont ask and dont tell!
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] SmiLey497:
My man.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
All's im saying... In the unlikely event any fruit related company comes to and gives me **** I hope you will all do what it is you can do to back me up!
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] robstunner:
I found that when disabling htclinkify that sometimes, links wont work anymore. like within messaging and email.