yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] porkenhimer:
Actually the size of the phone could stay the same and have a bigger screen, but there is one reason stopping this and that is the carrier logo and Samsung branding on the front. That being said the height of the screen which is 5.3 inches could probably be 5.7-5.8 inches if they left room at the top for the speaker, carrier logo & cam and removed the bottom buttons.

---------- Post added at 04:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:30 PM ----------

You are wrong about the One X, it does have a quad core processor but not in the US versions. US One X = Dual Core. Here's an article with the specs of AT&Ts version and the quad core version http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/htc-one-x-review/
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] PoLaRBe4r:
lol bigger screen, WTF
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] SayWhat10:
so what apps out now actually make use of having a quad-core cpu?

---------- Post added at 04:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:39 PM ----------

the note could probably easily go to 6.0" without it being larger

they would just have to figure out a way to eliminate the bezzle

espcially since like on the Nexus the buttons in ICS are on screen

EDIT: ok i see somebody said something smiliar to this
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] envision:
The next note has to have a quad core I don't see a dual core Note 2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Suzook1:
well if its a US market phone, LTE is preventing quad core phones at the moment (just look at the SGIII) so this MAY be true. If it does come out, I will be in line for it !!!!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] SayWhat10:
im not a CPU expert... how come quad-core cant do LTE ?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Suzook1:
http://www.droid-life.com/2012/05/2...-nvidias-icera-410-lte-modem-approved-by-att/

its coming but maybe not in time for the note?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Theoriginalgiga:
Agreed, but:

http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/nvidia-icera-410-lte-modem-att/

Nvidia is making a big play at it's quad core so it wouldn't let sleeping dogs lie with LTE.

Also Quad core isn't just where it's at:

http://www.phonearena.com/news/3GHz...-a-dual-core-28nm-processor-from-TSMC_id29809

I'm looking forward what next year will bring, about the end of next year I'll be ready for an upgrade :)

haha great minds think alike.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] nthknd:
Read the post I said lte doesn't play well so slll has a duel core. Cmon dude seriously relax
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Orange_furball:
So if this is real, what upgrades are we getting? I'm ready to spend $600-$650 on a Note 2, but I don't want a new shape and 512mb more ram. The screen is beautiful as is (except black crush but whatever) and ics sill be here... hopefully.

I don't know, Samsung, you guys really need to wow me with this next one. Meaning quad core, and 2gb of ram. Basically double the CPU and ram.

I can barely BARELY fit this phone in a plastic bag (very important factor to me believe it or not. More info on why per request.) If they go to 5.5" I'll have to figure something else out. This isn't a rant. I love the note and plan on only using Galaxy Notes from now on. If they continue the line.

©2012 Galaxy Note i717
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Xstop:
I'm curious if you guys could actually go with a bigger phone? I think I reached my max limit in physical size for a phone. But if they can keep the same physical size with a larger screen...****...SCORE!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] seeingwhite:
The exynos 5250 dual-core A15 SoC would be a big "wow".
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] H0rn3t920:
its prob gonna be a snapdragon if its on AT&T which blows
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Gramurai:
I'm not buying it. The release that is... Already? Im spekticle.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] i_max2k2:
This is what I call a pure BS article.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] RCranium666:
Quoted for truth.:D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jayRokk:
A hipster wrote that article to get a lot of views to get a screen shot and post it on instagram with a "cool" filter to get a lot of likes so he can post on twitter and show off to his hipster buddies......

oh and then put it on tumblr to get a lot of reblogs

lol what i think of the article :)

no pun for any one or OP or trying to start a flame war.. just having a little fun
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] erad1:
I have seen the same info (probably based on ubuntu's) in articles on Ubergizmo and Drippler pages. Its believable actually.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] erick161:
Things that are most likely coming...

-Bigger screen in same size chassis (simply by stretching the screen upward) OR higher res current size screen (more likely)

-2gb ram, duh. That's the new standard.

-bigger battery (really needs to happen)

-S4 pro, T3 quad core or preferably the exynos quad

-Home button setup like the GS3

-All the software goodies found in the GS3.

...I personally would welcome a new note in October. I purchased my note outright, so my contract will be up for renewal soon. Saving it for the GNote2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] 00mred00:
No details yet other than that the note 2 is in the works..and is hush hush.

look for a release as soon as this fall...on all carriers :cyclops:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Kraize:
You know what people say. PICS OR GTFO.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] sunshines4u:
They have a lot to improve for note 2..

Note 1 is the worst smartphone I ever owned... Most laggy and worst battery life..... Just big screen isn't good enough.

Yeah they need to release Note 2 ASAP.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] claywd:
Go home.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] madman604:
you're doing something wrong.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ZafarHSayed:
If that phone existed, Samsung/HTC/etc wouldn't give you an excuse to upgrade and spend another $700 in a few months again! Its their scheme :p
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] hfam95:
Info on the Note 2 for August. Now in Jelly Bean flavor. Enjoy.

http://www.redmondpie.com/galaxy-no....5-inch-display-12-mp-camera-jelly-bean-more/
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] seff5677:
eww pentile display ! no thanks
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] P1Tater:
Unveiled in August is a far cry from released to the public in August. Notice the sources they are quoting.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ekerbuddyeker:
The note 3 will have an 8 core CPU and 5.7" screen. And big speakers. And a projector. The device will get very hot but with the new 'steam' app will iron shirts.

Just another rumor.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jayRokk:
Anything after quad core 2Ghz is microwaves

Its impossible to run 8 with out melting the device ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] P1Tater:
Epic. Just epic. :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] 00mred00:
do your research....i brought details (and pics) of sammy's last 6 major phone and tablet releases months prior

:cyclops:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] porkenhimer:
Really? Well I know for a fact thats untrue because the S3 was held down like Fort Knox and nobody had a pic of it or the correct specs before it was announced to the public. You might have posted pics of what it was supposed to look like but you did not post actual pics of the S3 before the day it was revealed to the public. The hundreds of fake pics that are on the internet of what the next iphone or next big Android will look like that are supposed to real pics of the device do not count. You can look up any new device that is rumored to be coming out and find several different pics that are supposed to be confirmed pics of the device and the device looks different in all the pics. Since Samsung devices are reaching iphone territory when it comes to people anticipating their release, its gonna be harder and harder to get pics of new devices before they are announced and shown to the public. Look what happened to the last iphone, took people by surprise when it looked exactly the same as the iphone before it but if you look up the iphone five you will see several pics of it that all look different and its gonna be the same with the second generatin of the Note. I have already seen pics of two different devices that people claim in the "Note2" and they look nothin alike.

Here is an article from the very same day the S3 was announced and the pic and specs are all wrong so how did you post the correct pics and specs and the guy didn't

http://www.extremetech.com/computin...es-today-hardware-and-software-rumor-round-up
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Ausmike:
I am in honorable company here ,,,,, like mr Pork* ; P1* to mention a few and all OTHERS .................

am not a Phone Teckie .. but a lazy Unix/Linux dude ,,, who like to 'keep up with times'........

so yeah SamSu'g has come a long way - mostly i think IMHO....gained a lot from making and being APPLE"s supllier!!! so as typical as most "asian" mfger's are = LET COPY and IMPROVE ................ means lots of consumers gain to 'better - cheaper" tech faster!

i FOR ONE = never been a FAN of "closed system" thats i feel lucky enough to have got a job @ Unix /Linux company ,(my first windows laptop = 2005 and still dont know about about their stuff!!) ....

SO COME ON SAMSUNG ................ make it 8 Core -Exynos X SoC; powering a WQXGA (2560×1600) display .... and BLOW everyone AWAY !!!!

ahhh ... dreaming on a Tablet with those specs !

Cheers everyone
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] 00mred00:
All S3's in the wild prior to release were lunch boxed...(specs were dead on to what I reported in February btw, a few software features were unknown).

In the end I am not going to argue over it, I will just post elsewhere as I have in the past....I seem to only run into garbage here on XDA...no offense taken or meant..anyone can pop in and say he I just seen the new blahblahblah...just gets slightly annoying when the posts are there (for the note even) with hands on weeks or months prior to release

and no..I have no pics on the Note 2 because there is nothing to take a pic of. The device is in pre production...there is no test unit so I totally agree with you there....it does not yet exist, it is in the works.

The only "known" info is it will have a slightly larger screen. Beyond that my guy doesn't even know. With the fact that they may push for a early fall release rather than the original Holiday release we will most likely see an s3 in a larger package, with an Spen. (This goes along with their current strategy, which has been more focused on marketing than specs)

I update as I find the information from a local source at Samsung, which is typically 1-3 months prior to release.

Samsung had a different approach on each device over the past year so it is not possible to say which they will use in the future. For example, Demo units of the Note, 10.1 and 8.9 tabs were made available to Testers with explicit instruction to allow people to touch, play, feel it...The previous devices like the S2 variants and S3 were kept super secret, the S3 lunch box even has key markings (he still has his) that are traceable to who the device is issued to. I respect my source ...If he is sitting next to me and says here, play with it but no pics...I don't take pics while he is sitting there (no holds barred if he leaves me alone with a device haha)

s3 pictures like this were legit (and not taken by me ftr) testers never received a release device, only the lunchbox
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dkelley:
What? Note 1 is best cell phone I've owned, fastest CPU, zero lag, best screen, most memory, fastest memory and overall disk access speeds, lowest network latency (lower than s3)...

I'm an Android developer and work with many models from top to bottom, various brands, and the note is only surpassed by the s3 and even then I chose to buy the note with an option for either at approx the same price.

You clearly haven't owned a note 1.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jayRokk:
Coming from the guy who's going back to an iPhone

Lol

3.5 vs 5.3

Haha
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] porkenhimer:
Two totally different phones so why take cheap shots. You do not own any part of Google or Android so why are you so proud that you would lower yourself to make rude comments about his choice of device? I could understand repping a product if you owned it or are being paid to endorse it but its lame when you don't get anything in return. Its like people are so dumb they have become unpaid advertising robots for these businesses. I love when unintelligent people fight over which OS is better like it really matters. They are both great in their own way and thats all that matters. Neither is better than the other. Let people be happy with what they got and stop being a cyber bully.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] halfgingghost:
How many smart phones have you owned? I think of a crap ton worse than the Note, and only a few better. The battery life isn't actually bad at all, especially when considering screen size.

I can't see a Note 2 coming out so soon, and if it does it will be an international version. Nothing to replace the i717 in America. Doing so is bad business on Samsung's half. Can you imagine all of the people who would have waited 6 months to get a Note 2?

I just don't see it happening.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] :
It works for Apple though. :p
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] RCranium666:
Wow. You really have no idea. I've owned the iphone 3g and iphone 4 and once you flash the Note to ics it's better. All it takes is a little tweaking. The only thing I wish the i717 would have that the iphones do, is the physical home button. Btw, I've probably owned about 10 smartphones + pdas ever since the Newton, so I know about the evolution of these products and how good each one was.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] liljoka166:
I call bs
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Orange_furball:
Trolls don't eat meat.

sent from a phone or tablet using an app.
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
reserved for me :)

SOME RESULTS with

WANAM + Abyss kernel

(+2000 mA battery of course) :

RR 2.4 + Fluxi XX.02-beta5

Conservative + Noop

Final test :
[Galaxy S II General] ADX@ss:
Thank you very much bro !

Finally here your sharing !

Will test it right now !! :cool:
[Galaxy S II General] gamal001:
Thank you very much.

Finally your post.
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
you're welcome matey !

I have only one word. I was busy but finally get some free time to share all my settings.

Hope you like it bro :p
[Galaxy S II General] gamal001:
I'll testing now.:cool::cool:
[Galaxy S II General] gamal001:
Working fine.:thumbup::thumbup:
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
Glad to hear that dude !

I will update as soon as I find some more new stuffs to share :cool:
[Galaxy S II General] pustbunker:
Gonna try this as well later today :D
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
Yup, I'm pretty sure your Baby is hungry to test my Xtrem settings

I hope it goes well digest ;)

I'm Waiting for your feedback too !
[Galaxy S II General] awaisuk:
Is this ok stock battery or extended?
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
I don't understand. :confused:

You mean if it works on both 1650 & 2000 mhA ? Of course it does ! :cool:
[Galaxy S II General] awaisuk:
I mean that 7hr screen in time that u got are u using extended battery or normal one?
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
Well, using my 2000 mha battery as you expected :p

Sent from my S2 monster
[Galaxy S II General] Archsider:
Thanks for this post ! It works fine. But i have a little problem. I can't do nothing in init.d

When a want to put a script on , i cant. Permission's problem. And when i try to change the permission , i cant do it. Merci d'avance car je ne sais plus quoi faire :p
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
Salut l'ami :)

Are you using by chance RootExplorer ? If so, you have to switch mount ro/rw on the right top, every time you wanna make some modification.

Give a try :D
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
UPDATE :

- Add 3G/4G Speed Optimizer settings.

- Recomended duo : Pegasusq + SIO
[Galaxy S II General] UlbaWan-:
Hi french guy :p

Are you h3ro from Frandroid ? If you're, I don't know if you posted this on Frandroid, but it could be very appreciated ! :-D

In my case, on AOSP ROM, with Abyss kernel, after validated the UV, my phone instant restart :D

But it's looking good for people who have a phone who accept this extreme UV so thank you !
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
Salut frenchy ;)

Tu m'as bien reconnu.

Yup, He and I are actually the same and unique person. Well done, you're welcome :)

Shame ! I know that (un)fortunately my UV settings are really Xtrem for some of us, so just readapt on your own way to find best stabilies.

"we are not all equal". Anyway, It doesn't matter if we're happy.

Hope you are !

Cheers :D
[Galaxy S II General] luke2642:
Undervolting, battery and stability

I found very similar 'extreme' voltages/frequencies worked nicely on my s2, but as the battery dropped it became less stable. I found them by trial and error using siyah, setcpu and the built in stress tester.

So expect these values to work fine when you're at 80% but it might start crashing when you get near 25%. Adding 25mv across the board helped a bit but it would still lock up coming out of sleep occasionally.

Has anyone else had similar experiences?
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
Whats the job of the Bus Frequency? Do the Threshold levels do exactly?
[Galaxy S II General] msquared:
Hi guy i'm reporting here those settings on NEAK 2.0.6x kernel thet i'm currently running using the paid app NEAK configurator Pro

NEAK Options

enable AFTR idle mode and Ext4 Boost

CPU Control

Same UC,governor and scheduler of OP

GPU Control

Same as OP(2 freq)

Voltage Control

Same as OP but on 100mhz you can only set 800 as minimum possible

Misc Options

Treshold same as OP and dynamic hotplug enabled

Than reboot in recovery and go in kernel options>ASV bus frequency>set table 7

Warning some devices like mine :mad: can't keep an high bus voltage so if you get freezes just start going down with that table,for example now i'm running level 4
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
I quote again Master Droidphile for this : :D
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
Yup mate. Some others guys have already reported the same issue, as bus frequency level 7 is actually damned extremely critical and causes therefore often SOD and freeze.

Even on my device, I prefer not to set such lower frequency since It could be instable at all times when you're using it.

I would recommend you to stay away from level 7. Too dangerous level. :D
[Galaxy S II General] zenosteam:
so if i understand applying low frequency bus save more battery
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
For sure, that's the idea dude ! ;)
[Galaxy S II General] zenosteam:
i have on init.d 98tweaks should i remove it and install yours?
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
98tweaks from RR Rom, right ?

If so, no you don't have to remove it. ;)
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
Ram3n,

Found these on the official fluxi thread:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=27569133&postcount=1981

The xml is what i uploaded from that thread. The guy who uploaded says he can get 7 hours + on screen and 1 day 17 hours.

You think with them settings its really possible? To me it looks impossible, i think?
[Galaxy S II General] zenosteam:
no i am on rootbox
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
I think it's the same script : imoseyon mods isn't it ? You can leave it where it is. ;)
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
Why not ? After all, this guy isn't the first one who can achieve this.

From what I can see from his "settings" you posted, there is absolutely anything special which can save battery, specially the cpu_max_freq set to 1.2Ghz... Plus, this isn't very informative and it lacks a lot of parameters.

To me, he must have a very agressive governing and hotplug settings. But, i don't really like guessing :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
I applied it

Hitplug was basically rise at 20 drop at 10 i think

He said 'Yes with these options I got 1 day 8 hours with display on 17h runtime. Sunday I'll post some screenshots in the week I use my phone much more with more powerfull apps for my work. And yes I use 2000mah battery'

I changed a few things on it. AFTR+LPA UC to 1000, UV, GPU UC & UV.

Bln and Lights off.

Changed Bus voltage too. Left everything else as is. We shall see!

Surely it should be even better then ;)
[Galaxy S II General] msquared:
What about this settings on thoravukk?

Do they work good?
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
Well, if he tells the truth then he could easily provide some screenshots for proove it. :)

If not, you guess what i'm thinking of...

Yup, It should also run well on Thoravukk.

I can proudly claim that I've already tested all my settings on Siyah, NEAK, Shun, Fluxi, Dorimanx. Only Thoravukk is missing ATM.

However, you can try it and leave me a report to confirm it, if you have time mate. :D
[Galaxy S II General] msquared:
No problem i'll flash it and report what i get ;)
[Galaxy S II General] sid9922:
@ram3n,

Mate, which touchscreen settings are you using with fluxi kernel? Coz even after flashing S3 fujutweaks i still have some major lags especially in xda app..im currently on default setting of fluxi beta.05
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
Hi mate,

I can't tell the difference as I was using the default one. But try to change to gingerbread preset.

Now, I'm using Dorimanx latest 3.6

Damned, very good surprised until now.

Will update the OP soon. :cool:

Sent via my s2 monster
[Galaxy S II General] grzesdroid:
Ok, start test -> dorimanx 3.6. may be better than fluxi. and has a dualboot

tapatalk@ SGS ||

[/QUOTE]
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
UPDATE

:

- Update EXTWEAKS SETTINGS for DORIMANX KERNEL 3.6

- New recommended duo for better batterylife: Conservative + Noop
[Galaxy S II General] raza_k:
Dorimanx Kernel 3.6

Thanks alot for this sick thread! Helped me out alot especially with fluxi kernel but I can never seem to get the bus voltage table as low as you without freezes.

Anyways, I noticed you have no undervolting in your extweaks settings for dorimanx kernel 3.6, was this a mistake or... actually no undervolting?
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
Hey mate,

Very glad to hear that :D

No its not a mistake as I use my own Xtrem UV settings with a script. So, UV in extweaks is redundant and not useful for me therefore ;)

Cheers!

Sent via my s2 monster
[Galaxy S II General] xanthrax:
:)ram3n settings are great ! the performance tested with antutu is ... low but battery life is amazing ! i`ll test more apps and games to check performance but these 2 cores should do a nice job togheter despite of low frequency !!! gret job mate !:)
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
Ram3n.

Using them settings I posted yesterday and tweaked them a little (UC CPU & GPU, UV CPU&GPU, Changed to AFTR+LPA) . Heres what i have so far:

-Alot of texts. in the region of 150.

-Any browsing on the net is done with Wi-Fi on.

-Auto Brightness enabled

This wasn't started from 100% either, roughly 83%. Using a 2000Mah battery too
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
Thanks for your report bro!

I don't really trust Benchmarks, daily usual practice is more appropriated to my mind.

I don't care about getting and showing off with amazing 10.000 scores or what :D

Plus, this is expected since my settings have UC the CPU/GPU and have aggressive threshold steps.

My goal is to achieve to a very good experience with both battery life and nice enough performance to play games, playing videos, and so on. :p

Cheers

Sent via my s2 monster
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
Pretty good results.

But to my mind, there's any special in this guy settings. To tell the truth, you can thank above all fluxi cause even with all stock settings, it performs very well. ;)

Sent via my s2 monster
[Galaxy S II General] xanthrax:
me too ! that`s why i purchased my Mazda 2 sport :D
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
Damned, it's hot man!

I'm almost jealous now! Lol :D

Sent via my s2 monster
[Galaxy S II General] xanthrax:
yep , it`s my second little monster after SG S2 of course :D
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
Pretty good, but could be better i think!
[Galaxy S II General] ram3n:
Of course, it could be better and I'm gonna show you soon with my incoming current kernel test.

Be tuned ;)

Sent via my s2 monster