yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] combatmedic870:
With no brand preference, the newer samsung pro's are really good. 70 read, 20 write, waterproof shock proof...ect... slighty more then the sandisk ultras.

http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-Elect...358816559&sr=1-3&keywords=32gb+micro+sd+uhs-1

I prefer the sandisk ultra personally, but seems some people hear have had problems, this is just another alternative out there. it gets good ratings.

When it comes to buying memory cards now. unless you get a 32gb SD ultra class 10 for 10 bucks, go for the uhs-1. It will give you a little more longevity out of it in regards to replacing it due to becoming outdated. Also....more advice would be to not buy a memory card with less then 32GB of memory. a 16gb sandisk ultra uhs-1 costs $22 and a 32gb costs $28(to go the 64 is alot more spendy, but 32gb ones are the best buys right now). pay the 6 extra bucks, apps arent getting any smaller. GB's are going the way of MB's fast enough.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] darandster2:
Gskil

I've got a Gskil class 10 mirco SD. It's pretty nice
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] uffdapower:
Do any of you guys know if you can make an external sd the default download storage?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] sstem:
My Sandisk

On an MB886

Figured I'd share mine since I didn't see any with better speeds.

I've never had any problems with it, I use Foldermount with it with no problems, although I tried the swap script for an entire day with no success.

Edit: correction, I see some that have better write speeds
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] XiphoneUzer:
I don't need the room, but I want to start flashing roms.

I can't decide between 32g and 64g (which is the better deal now that the 128's are coming out)?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] skip24ftlb:
I've been using one of these for the last 18month. Its been faultless and FAST

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B009HPFUGI?pc_redir=1398711960&robot_redir=1
[General Questions and Answers] Tomaj33:
Hi

Anyone knows why I can't charged battery to 100% in my DEFY+ with MS2ginger 4.0 on board?
[General Questions and Answers] Venomusdragon:
Did you calibrate your battery? Wait until it is charged as far as it will, go into recovery if you have a calibrate option do so, if not there are apps o the market for it, see if that works, it should set your Max charge to 100%
[Nook Touch Themes and Apps] sswoozooss:
I use GBC A.D. with NoRefresh which made it possible to play any game normally.

Playing Kirby is a bit difficult with things constantly attacking. Pokemon on the other hand is easy to navigate with some practice. I don't need the sound, I'd rather hear real music anyway :D

I want to try Beavis and Butthead for Sega Genesis on it next. Sadly, the sounds are half the fun in that game and they will be missed while playing.

http://imgur.com/a/RX8nH#0

As I uploaded them, Imgur went down. So some might not be there. Maybe I'll take some more later
[Nook Touch Themes and Apps] caco26:
i love it

I like:D could you pass me the link for the emulator?:3 pokemon
[Nook Touch Themes and Apps] sswoozooss:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bslapps1.gbc

MOD EDIT: LINKS TO GAME ROMS ARENT ALLOWED.
[Nook Touch Themes and Apps] danmanx:
Hey sswooz, any videos of this in action? I'm curious to see it. Sadly, I fear even the slightest gb platformer would be difficult to play.
[Nook Touch Themes and Apps] apeine:
I used to have Gargoyle's Quest cartridge, so I downloaded the rom. Ghosting interfere a lot, and virtual buttons really make it lame. Maybe RPG game would fare better, or maybe a slower puzzle.
[Nook Touch Themes and Apps] danmanx:
Yeah.... definitely like the whole notion of running it...but the ghosting would eventually wear me down.

Not running any games on it currently. :(
[Nook Touch Themes and Apps] sswoozooss:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGyyZfOxne4

Here's a video of it with the NoRefresh turned on. I played 2 games, Pokemon and Kirby. I played up until that point only using the nook. When I'm not too lazy, I'll beat the game on it! It's at around 2:00 minutes for the first game. The ghosting is part of the experience playing it on an ereader. It doesn't seem to bother me :good:
[Nook Touch Themes and Apps] mrWax:
x11?

what is that X11 thing you run in the video?
[Nook Touch Themes and Apps] danmanx:
Wow great video! Pokemon ran great with norefresh hack. Thanks for the awesome video.
[Nook Touch Themes and Apps] sswoozooss:
It's not running X11, it's Mini vMac, emulating old Macintosh software. I'm getting pretty far in Pokemon (when I have spare time) I chose the yellow version because I won't be allowed to dupe items. I always cheat in red or blue, ruining the fun!
[Nook Touch Themes and Apps] kura808:
Hehe I saw your video with the mini vmac. I was surprised it works quite well on ereaders. I'm running it on my Sony Reader xD thanks for posting the vid. Brings back memories.
[Nook Touch Themes and Apps] sswoozooss:
Hey everyone, I tried out a Game Boy Advance emulator with a USB keyboard for controls and I'd like to share it with you. I think it worked out pretty well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szdqo73dZrY
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] asimarif11:
hi,

ill be very brief now

i tried installing paranoid android 1.1b and while installing it through i got the error message related to get assert something .. and something related to build.prop concerning ro.product device ( i think so )

and then showing this status 7 error at the end

i tried downloading it 4 times .. 2 from ma mob and twice from ma pc with the same result

also ive been searching for 2 days for this ... some said its a partition issue .. others say its the installed issue .. but the others never got the error (ive tried installing other roms and all have installed just fine )

and another bit of info is that ive been dual booting my device...

plz help me guys .. i want that rom badly :D
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ctomgee:
Status 7 usually means an assert failed during install when determining what model phone you have. What is your phone model? (check on the label under battery)
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] atifsh:
If you done a clean slate, / full wipe, some times it happens,

Flash a stock ROM using Odin first

flash cwm and flash a custom ROM.

After this you can format clean again and flash your ROM.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] asimarif11:
I think the rom i was trying to install was for a diff model .(cant believe im that sick)

Anyways wasted my 2 days .. ita all ok now thanks guys u rock ! : d
[Verizon Droid Incredible 2] kubes069:
I am on the hunt for the best music playing app. I currently use Google Music, as it is one of the best I have used to date. My problem is with the new limitation on devices I am eventually no longer going to be able to use it because I flash new roms all the time.

I don't want to store all my music on my SD because it is not exactly the most efficient way for me. I want to be able to stream my library just like the way Google Music does it, but I can't find anything that works as nice.

I'm sure I will not be the only one that will encounter this problem with the stupid limitation thing.

Any ideas???
[Verizon Droid Incredible 2] AJGO23:
I thought Google had fixed that a couple weeks ago? Have you tried checking on the Google Music webpage on your computer?
[Verizon Droid Incredible 2] revile:
Yea, Google responded pretty quickly to that uproar

http://www.androidmag.com/google-resolves-music-device-de-authorization-issue-now

I'm all for Google Music because of the cloud integration. I still find it amazing that I walk around with my 15,000 songs and 100+ playlists in my pocket.

I believe the stock audio player for CM9, Apollo, will also be a market app if I'm not mistaken. Anything from those guys is definitely worth checking out
[Verizon Droid Incredible 2] kubes069:
thanks. I didn't know they fixed it. I cleaned up my device list now. Let's just hope that they don't put a limit on this in the future.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Ok, there has been a lot of controversy about which stock kernel runs best on the 1.8x based ROMS.

Some people will tell me 1.82.x runs the best, others tell me 1.88.x runs the best. And we can all agree that 1.85.x runs the worse...

So I have decided to make all three versions available in a flashable zip format for your testing / usage pleasure.

Features

All three images are unsecured and have init.d support.

All can and should be flashed from whichever custom recovery you have.

All also include the appropriate modules so all functions will work like normal.

Do not flash these on a 1.7x ROM unless you enjoy watching your phone bootloop!!!

If your going to download these please hit Thanks. Its not hard to do, as a matter of fact, its just as easy to do as hitting the download button :p

Have fun!

-Scott
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Reserved
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Skizzy034:
I'll have to agree 100%. 1.82>1.88>1.85.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] gunnyman:
Thanks Scott. I've flashed 1.82 and am trying it out.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Garmig:
I am testing 1.82..
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
I would kill for you guys to post all your results...

Mostly I am wanting to know...

Benchmarks (yeah, I know, they dont matter, lulz)

Fluidity of Sense 4.0

Battery life

Test with "Dual Core Mod" if you choose as well, just test without it FIRST.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] gunnyman:
EDIT:

Reading is fundamental :D

Quadrant score is 4939

CPU 7563

MEM 7798

I/O 6284

2D 971

3D 2078

I'll let you know battery life after I have a full charge.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Hydromea:
Ok, so I had been running rooted, unlocked 1.73. I flashed CleanROM DE with no problems. Now, my kernel version shows up as 1.85. So I can simply flash one of these kernels straight over this ROM?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] dkirchik:
1.88 boot
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Cryosx:
how's the fluidity/smoothness of 1.82?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] mrjaydee82:
The first one is 1.88 kernel which scored a little higher, and the other is 1.82 kernel. So far 1.82 and 1.88 feels about the same. I'll try the CPU mod and come back. Also I'll test out battery usages....I do feel 1.85 kernel has the best battery ...that's just by me using the 2.3 cleanrom the past couple days...I've been on 2.4 since last night...well like I said I'll be back after some more testing.

With the dual core ultimate I have worse performance with the mod on 1.82....reverting that back...even on antutu went down about 600 points.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] gunnyman:
very similar to 1.88 IMHO. To me the most important thing is going to be battery.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] NguyenHuu:
I don't have any concrete tests, but jsut going back to 1.82 from 1.88 I can feel a difference in fluidness of sense. For example, in 1.85 and 1.88 it will have a maybe 1-1.5 second stutter before it launches the app drawer. Like when I press the app drawer button, itll lag and then open. in 1.82, the app draw opens almost instantly. The scrolling side to side on the home screen is also not as laggy. 1.88 definitely is better than 1.85 though. But 1.82 is pretty good. that's the only thing that's been bugging me with the later kernels.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] corythug:
Was on 1.85 and had terrible battery and signal drops, if drops are even related idk. This compared to 1.73

Testing out 1.88 now.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Yes.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Hydromea:
Yeah, even compared to 1.73, 1.85 feels a little 'buggier'. I've been getting worse download speeds and worse battery life. I'm going to keep running 1.85 for a few more hours to fully test the battery buy so far it hasn't been that great.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
So how does 1.82 compare to 1.73?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Hydromea:
I haven't tried it yet, but here's a sample of my battery life on 1.85. I actually isn't that bad, seeing how my screen was on most of the time.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kravguy:
Flashed 1.82 but kernel version in about still says 1.85. Is that right? I was running 1.85 w/clean rom de 2.1
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Garmig:
I feel the phone faster and smooth with 1.82..boot img comparing with the boot img included in 2.4

Also with 1.88 the phone lost the upload speed.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
No. Kernel versions are like 3.0.xxxxxx

There is no kernel version 1.8x only software versions.

Look at the OP. I posted a picture for you to verify because I anticipated this question.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] mrjaydee82:
To be completely honest I have to say after running 1.82 kernel for a bit...with sense there is no lag at all....1.88 kernel seems to be pretty close to 1.82 but 1.88 battery is better. It's a tough one but I think I rather run 1.88
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] knuckleheadAj3:
1.88

Nocturnal Senseless

Viper DCM Ultimate

...I'll post battery stats later tonight after a full day. Phone runs like butter. No lags.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kravguy:
Omg, you're right. Didn't even notice the kernel version in those pics. My fault. Been a rough week. Thanks for responding though.

And fyi, everything is running smooth, even on. 1.85. I haven't really noticed any difference with 1.82 but maybe that's cause they're both so good. It's been nice being able to only complain about visual elements and not having to worry about system issues like lagging, fc, etc. Really looking forward to the future with this device and seeing what you devs and themers come up with.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] blacklistedcard:
I tried the ultimate CPU mod and did not like it. There was a ton of lag with everything on the device. So I removed it. I was on radio 1.85, so I don't know if that was the issue. Going to try 1.88 and see if it helps with the radio problems. I'm disappointed with both the 4lte and wireless on this device. My old x10 Sony blew it away.

I also wish there was a way to determine if the wireless connection was at G or N.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Hydromea:
I flashed 1.82 and so far it feels smoother than 1.73 or 1.85. All my Quadrant scores (ran 4 times) are over 4900, and my AnTuTu scores are also higher. I'll post some pictures. The actual user interface seems noticeably smoother too. Or maybe this is just a placebo… :)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] ethantarheels123:
Does anyone have any input on the battery life of the 3 kernels compared? i am totally willing to give up a slight bit of smoothness for a noticeable increase in battery life.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Skizzy034:
Battery life has been impressive. Here is my quadrant.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Yeah, I think the same thing. 1.82 is better.

Thats "fair". With CleanROM 2.4 and 1.82 kernel, no CPU mods I score 7050.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] fluxgfx:
I think I'll just run around with the 1.88 kernel and see how it works.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
For me, performance always outwieghs battery life. If I can boot performance 10% and it decreased battery life by 20% than that would be a fair trade for me :eek:

Everyone will have different needs but my need is raw performance :D
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] ethantarheels123:
What are you rolling with?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] dkirchik:
What's your FPS on crysis 2? Lmao. :D
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] mzimmer88:
5102 quadrant with 1.82 kernel and dual core mod 2.1
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Koizuma:
Here's one of mine, stock frequency, no dual core mod, running 1.88

Swyped from my HTC One X using XDA Premium App.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] knuckleheadAj3:
1.82.

Without DCM mod this time. When I applied the script my AnTuTu went backwards by a handful of points.

Can't remember what I got exactly with 1.88, but I know the 1.82 beat it by at least 100.

I've been flashing all day so my battery stats are jacked...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] aimetti:
1.82 boot image on 2.4 clean rom still breaks wifi right?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] dkirchik:
Nope. No wifi break issue for me and I'm 1.82 and clean 2.4.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] tyshemi:
100% stock
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Skizzy034:
Just 2.4 no mods.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Skizzy034:
I was wondering what happened to my WiFi after I flashed the 1.82 boot.img. I was on 2.1 tho and it gave an error.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] knuckleheadAj3:
...running 1.82 w/ 2.1 ultimate sending this via wifi.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] carlitos29:
Same happened to me, I just reflashed in recovery and the issue was gone.

An image of my quadrant score with 1.82 kernel and dual core mod. CleanRom 2.4 installed.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kravguy:
Flashed 1.88 earlier and everything seemed ok. Just went into sysctrl though and it showed the second cpu as offline. Reflashed 1.82 and it's showing as back online. Just thought I'd throw that out there in case anyone else has that issue. I really didn't notice any speed issues or lags and probably would never have known if I didn't see it in sysctrl. If I get a chance tomorrow, I'll do some benchmark comparisons and look at the logcat with 1.88. I'll also check to see what I have script wise in my init.d though I think I only have scripts to speed up the sd storage and cleaning the cache.

Also, I'm assuming that it shouldn't show as offline cause even with nothing going on, it's always shown running before (usually at 384).
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
The only reason it did that the frist time was becasue the ROM did not have mathcing modules. When I made the flashable ones in the OP I included the modules that matched the specific version of the kernel so you can flash this on top of any 1.8x base ROM and they should automagically work.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Skizzy034:
I don't know if performance was better for me on 1.82 over 1.88 bit I do remember that the quadrant scores were pretty close.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Koizuma:
With my earlier setup I reran my benchmark

With DCM: 4337

Without: 6438

2101 difference between them.

Swyped from my HTC One X using XDA Premium App.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] moehagene:
1.88 kernel. 2.1 mod
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] warri:
Just switched from 1.88 DCM to 1.82 No DCM

HUGE Performance increase. Apex and Sense 4.0 are running extremely fast and smooth now. As well as other apps.

I'll have some benchmarks from 1.82 no DCM in a sec.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] benbailey84:
How are you guys getting these high scores? The highest I have gotten was 4700. Running clean Rom 2.4 dcm and I have tried 1.85, 1.82 1.88 from page 1...

Sent from my rooted HTC ONE X running Clean Rom V.2.4
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] corythug:
1.88 didn't fix my radio issues, unsurprisingly but I was hoping. Sometimes I go a day no issue, other times 3 times in 15 minutes, usually while on tapatalk. I wonder if there is a correlation...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] slippers67:
Actually, the second core goes offline if there's no need for it, regardless of which kernel you're using. The only way it stays on all the time is with the dual core mod, if you flashed that.

If you sit there and watch systempanel or system tuner you'll see the second core occasionally come online, especially if you have some process running in the background that is cpu intensive.

I haven't really noticed a difference between 1.82 and 1.88 kernels. Signal/data/wifi seems to be about the same on both for me.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] bryyte:
I flashed the 1.82 because I also believe it runs the best. Is this the same thing as running the ruu or does this only change the kernel. (if i like 1.82 but still want the cleanrom de what should I do)

sent by the htc one x
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
These only flash the boot.img and associated modules that the phone needs for things like Wifi, etc.

They will not change any of the radios or anything like that.

The should be safe to flash over any ROM in here. Not sure about Turge's 1.7x ROM though as these are all 1.8 based.

You can flash these over any of my ROM versions and any of msMajicals ROMS with no issues because we are using the same 1.85 base.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] bryyte:
Ohh ok.. sorry for the cluelessness :o I appreciate your help.. it seems very difficult to get a solid answer on the q&a side. I'm probably gonna stick to 1.82 for now. I liked it without the quick settings and social apps. Good work though!

sent by the htc one x
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Scott:
Ok man. Glad you enjoy it!
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] iElvis:
Is this still the case? If we're on 1.73, then what?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kravguy:
I guess I just happened to always look at sysctrl when the second core was online. I never ever saw it as offline until right after I flashed 1.88. That's when a red flag went up to me. I actually sat there for a little bit waiting for it to do something and it just sat there offline. I flashed 1.82 and went back in and it was sitting there at 384. That's why I posted that, my mistake. Actually, I am pretty confused on all of this. I was watching the cores earlier (yeah, i was bored) and the second core was doing all the jumping around while the first one was sitting at 384. Now this is while on 1.88 with dualcore mod 2.1. When I look at the times though, I can definately see cpu0 has been doing most of the work. cpu0 has been offline for about 17hrs while cpu1 about 24 hours. cpu0 maxed at around 34 minutes was cpu1 maxed for only 15 seconds. I really shouldn't be too worried about any of this cause battery has been great and no lags. It's just the tweaker in me kinda takes over.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] slippers67:
Well, it's hard to say what exactly is going on when you're using the dual core mod. Yes, the second core is online, but the kernel may not even prioritize anything despite it being powered up. Or it'll use cpu1 over cpu0, as you've seen. There's no way to know what is really going on with the stock kernels.

What we really need is the kernel source code, and the appropriate tweak setup implemented (like leantweaks for leankernel on the gnex), so that we can change the thresholds for when the second core comes online, and so forth. At least then we'll know it's using it when we want it to be used, in order to make the smartphone experience better.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] :
Im on the leaked 1.85 ruu and this kernel sucks... I dont care about the DCM, so without it, whats the best kernel for no laggieness and best battery life? 1.82 kernel?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] dharani1234:
Did you try 1.88 .... it's "proven" to have the best battery life ...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] the_scotsman:
Where is it "proven"?

I'm just curious. I'm runing CleanROM 2.5.5 which comes with 1.88. A lot of people seem to be saying 1.82 is best for battery life.