yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[General Questions and Answers] bigstu23:
I ask this here as I've already asked on the Samsung Galaxy S3 forum with no answers. I'm guessing there are more teccy types here! Okay, getting p*issed now. I have a brand new Samsung Galaxy S3 and my friend's HTC One S is FAR faster on the internet than my handset. Both handsets came from 3UK (network locked & branded) on the same plan (The One Plan). The tests were done with the same sim so it's not the sim card-definitely the handset. Also, of course, they were done in the exact same location at the same time.

My previous SGS2 compared like my current handsset with his HTC but I assumed that was because the HTC had more up to date components and getting the all new SGS3 would solve. Obviously not!!!

I have looked at the settings and I can't see anything I can change. Can any of the wizards here shed some light?
[General Questions and Answers] No1ustad:
how did u use the same sim at the same time?
[General Questions and Answers] estallings15:
Lol....

Look, dude. Your browser's speed is a combination of three things.

1) Hardware - including processor, memory and radio/modem.

2) ISP - This speaks for itself

3) Software - Poorly written software will load and display a page slowly. Herein lies your answer, I'm guessing.

Root and flash away. That's how you fix that.

I own neither handset, but basic logic leads me to this conclusion. That said, I may be wrong.
[General Questions and Answers] palmy999:
How much faster? Seconds? Minutes?

I would test accessing at same place, same time on the same Wifi and using same browser to get a baseline. Testing on mobile signal is just too unpredictable.

Cheers
[General Questions and Answers] KRJ_87:
Both of these people mention key points about your data speed tests. Testing two different devices that are performing the same task is about all those devices have in common. You need some intersecting properties between the two devices. Yes, their os may be the same but are they even running the same version? They are different makes, HTC vs. Samsung, using different browsers plus more.

You can test over and over to see which comes out on top. But you won't know why until you find out what the differences and similarities are between the two devices to see why you're getting the results you've been getting. Hope this helps.

-Kris
[Atrix 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] homerwasa:
So Ive rooted my Atrix4g, and I want to unlock my bootloader.

I understand the plus of doing this, and realize I cant turn back once this is done.

So I know this has been beat to death but...

Will I regret doing this?

Assuming I want a ICS Rom I have notice that they all have some slight bugs reported. Do I wait for the official Rom to be deployed, or do you think all the bugs will be worked out by the time it is released.

Also when it is released will it be able to be flashed.

All these Questions are for a noob to the Atrix.

Any and all discussions will help.

Please don't try to convice me just some input of your experience.

ie* your favorite rom, things you wish was better... why you unlocked the bootloader. ect...

Thank you everyone your all very helpful.
[Atrix 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ccrows:
It comes down to if you are bored with stock or not. Personally I believe that all Android phones should have an unlocked BL. Sure most people are not power users like us, but the "option" should still be available.

Anywhoo I would highly recommend for starters to go with CM7after you unlock. See what you like and what you don't like and then give the ICS ROMS a shot and go from there... :)
[Atrix 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kuba.g:
How buggy are the ICS ROMs actually? I assume jokersax's CM9 ROM is the most stable. Is there a overview somewhere of what doesn't work on it? Or would someone be willing to list it for us? (The topic has 850 pages, so that's kind of hard to work through).

I'm considering buying an Atrix (European version) and I'd like to know if I'd be able to use the incredibly smooth ICS experience like on this youtube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQvrEH74dgI or if the reality isn't going to be that sweet :P
[Atrix 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] LavLab:
The Atrix ICS experience these days is a very smooth & enjoyable one. The few bugs that remain are video camera issues, but Videocam Illusion from the playstore works ok. Still camera fc's once in a while but works upon restarting the app. Browser will crash when rotated, but works fine if you stay portrait or landscape. These niggles aside, ICS is great! Have tried Jokers CM9, AOKP & MIUI. Currently running Leo's AOKP, I like the added customization options that it offers over CM9.

EDIT: BTW, once the official ICS for Atrix is released, I'm sure all of these bugs will be worked out.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netban:
[ROM][4.0.4][B39] FrozenAOKP from ᵀᵉᵃᵐfʳºʐᵉⁿ [Nightlies]

ᵀᵉᵃᵐfʳºʐᵉⁿ

Presents

​

Features:

Based on AOKP ICS 4.0.4 (IMM76I) – Built from source

Standard CM kernel with BLN

Both Nova and Apex launchers built in

Themes Manager

Plus all other features of CM/AOKP

Changelog:

Almost impossible with nightlies... But new icons/apps may be added over time.

Downloads:

Mod Edit: Links removed

Install with CWM, full wipe. Flash ROM and GApps consecutively, wipe dalvik/cache and fix permissions, reboot end enjoy :)

Known Bugs:

Same as CM9...

FAQ's:

GApps - Google has removed any apps that can be downloaded from the Play Store. These include GMail,Youtube and few others, so please download those from the Play Store (Thanks 078gregory)

Music Player - A music player is yet to be included but will be intergrated in the near future. For now I suggest the Apollo Music Player for CM9 (Thanks to Andrew Neal for making the app and Shinydude100 for the thread)

FM Radio - We do not include an FM radio but you may try the Spirit FM Radio app, users of the app say its a god send (Thanks to mikereidis for the app and thread)

Props and Credits go out to:

Codeworkx and the excellent CM9

TeamHacksung

AOKP Team

Goo-Inside.im

Cyberboob (toggle icons)

Rodries

Roar

(Please consider a donation wherever possible for the superb work these people do)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netban:
ⓜⓞⓓ'ⓢ​

Toggles (made by cyberboob)

SS Blue: http://www.mediafire.com/?v58o9k4b1ba4hva

SS Glow Reflected: http://www.mediafire.com/?ayzebt2cvhnwpcz

Flash with CWM.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netban:
Reserved, just 1 more :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] web.designer.iq:
No direct link
[Galaxy S II Android Development] TonyK2005:
Which file is the 1 to download? 01/06/2012 or 02/06/2012? Thanks.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netban:
The latest SGS2 file is 20120602 :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Arnadel:
20120602 --> 30.32 mb

What is this ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yahyoh:
the latest nightly is 30MB O_o
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netban:
For the purposes of safety use 20120601 until I can verify what is going on there. Thanks for your patience :)

I will be back in an hour or so... Thanks again.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lilmark91:
sgs2 bricked with this ****ing **** OMG
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yahyoh:
why?????????how?????? u flashed the 30MB file? or what
[Galaxy S II Android Development] gdevil:
This is a netchip's rom as far as I know.

I flash it yesterday the 20120602 version and it doesn't brick my device at all.

I must say there's something weird with the file in this post cuz mine's weight 120mb.

Regards

Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netban:
This is unfortunate but I nor anybody else can take responsibility for you bricking your phone.

I can only guess you flashed a ROM for a different device. I am writing this message from FrozenAOKP and I myself have flashed it several times.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] zenosteam:
Welcome to this new rom

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9100 avec Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ‬1‬:
come on man. you can't be relax like this.a galaxy s2 is not something cheap. how many times have you heard a rom bricked a phone? don't you read what's people saying about your rom? why don't you answer them or help who had problem with your rom? but you're just saying it's not my responsibility what happened to you.if you don't have any idea what are you doing just delete this sh..ty topic and get lost.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netban:
Please refrain from being hostile.

What am I supposed to do about it? Maybe if he gave more details there could have been more help. For instance, which file was used perhaps? This is Netchips work, not mine and he is a competent dev. I would not have made this thread if I had any idea that it could brick you phone.

Like I said, Me and many others have tested this ROM.

And no it certainly is not my responsibility
[Galaxy S II Android Development] snowblind2142:
Wow, you guys are going to be popular round here... :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ImpheOtus:
Come on guys. The thread has just been opened and you all are being hostile for no exact reason. There is no way you can brick a phone for good if you know what you are doing...

And Rizur is right, if the bricker wants help he should ask for it and provide details.

I'll try the ROM in a couple hours and let you know how it went with me.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ice14777:
Thank
[Galaxy S II Android Development] AyrSales:
Awesome, waiting for this rom, i love the old work of netchip.

Good luck guys!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] umair9001:
Provide more details rather than OMG HELP..

u learn if u read..read and google things, m sure u will get it back alive..

if still things don't work out for u check ur sgs II model, is it i9100 or someother variant.. (i9100g,m, etc..)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Mr.Greg:
If you really bricked, you should proof and provide more information, how did you bricked, people will learn something from this. If you posted just to spam this thread, it's not a good idea. If you don't like something, just leave this thread or build your own rom. Good luck.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bundi22:
can someone please clarify this,

this is an aokp based rom, but are all these changes http://cm-nightlies.appspot.com/?device=galaxys2 implemented, or only the ones on the AOKP website http://aokp.co, or both??
[Galaxy S II Android Development] vivmar:
Finally ,this rom here!

Great work TEAMFROZEN!

---------- Post added at 09:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:11 AM ----------

m8,

i think you do something wrong,if your device is bricked.

This rom work perfectly,no issue...also tryed the version for htc one x and work very well...

U should specify better which problem you have....
[Galaxy S II Android Development] uppon2:
Good to see you guys back up and running ;)

---------- Post added at 06:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:19 PM ----------

Paradox using a different username? Noob
[Galaxy S II Android Development] JohnBonchie:
Dude enough already w tt saga
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Mr.Greg:
Ha ha. This is news of the day. Agree with you.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] *SanSiro*:
Cool, I'll check the IRC channel tonight! :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yahyoh:
no bro this change for cm9 ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] superleeds27:
AOKP normally merge CM9 fixes into the build too.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] schnuffdroid:
i'm allways searching for a aokp port that's as pure aokp as possible... ;)

what build does this rom base on? 37? :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ImpheOtus:
Flashed ROM and everything is working as it should.

I find it to be a little laggy. Don't know what could that be.

Also, I flashed gapps 2012-04-29 and the applications didn't install (no gmail, no youtube, etc.) What could be the problem?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Mr.Greg:
From this version which you flashed was removed youtube, gmail, coz you can download this apks from play store. Older release has it, 22-04-2012 version
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ImpheOtus:
Yeah... thanks! I just remembered that!!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] hailmary:
lol...stop playing online games & start reading the faqs:D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yahyoh:
i feel all aokp builds for sgs2 are the same with builds add some apps and some bloatware and all of them are still slower than cm9 idk why and all of them has low I/O bug and no dev fixed (cm9 has no problem with I/O)

btw i really like aokp roms but i hope this 2 things get fixed :o:rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Dawgplg:
Installed the ROM but it seems that the SD Card mounts are messed up. Originally I installed with a MicroSD card installed, install went ok, OS fires up but it seems like the apps are installing to the card instead of the internal memory. Removed the card and reflashed, now apps cant seem to create folders on the internal sd... ie titanium backup is unable to create a folder.

Has anyone else experienced this?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bajee11:
Nice :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yabadabadooo:
Installed the 02/06 release.

Everything works fine so far.

Mountpoints are fixed in this version. Realy love it.

But can't register to the forum?

Dont get the registration email?

sent from my Galaxy S II
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Dawgplg:
Where did you get the 06/02 build? I saw it earlier, but I only see builds for the OneX and N7000. Good to hear about the mount points, should fix me up.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netban:
Hi!

Yea the 20120602 file was removed due to something being wrong, I dont know what but the file size was far too small.

Next nightly will have the mountpoint fix and Apollo Music player.

Rizur.

PS any problem with the forum should be resolved and the account activated. The emails are taking forever so I'm activating manually for now. Any problems regarding activation, please dont hesitate to contact me
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yabadabadooo:
I think something wents wrong with the upload..

If someone wants here is the working 02/06

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4556011/FrozenAOKP-20120602-SGS2.zip

sent from my Galaxy S II
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Dawgplg:
Thanks for the link.

To Rizur: just curious why ROMS are being built with Apollo Music Player, I have seen it pop up a few times, not really a fan of the software, I typically grab something from the market. But am always willing to give it a shot.

Thanks for all the hard work.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yabadabadooo:
Err you can easylie delete it

ie with titanium.

I delete after every update several unneeded apps like gtalk, pico tts, news and weather and so on...

sent from my Galaxy S II
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netban:
Mainly because it is the stock player with more features and is quickly becoming the standard. As said above, you can remove and replace with your fave music player :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bajee11:
I like Apollo :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ImpheOtus:
What is the low I/O bug?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Siemser:
Nice comeback netchip-rom. Hope no scam will going forward

:)

Is beta-section on forum only closed section?

Can I be enabled like in old hydrog3n-forum if my account is activated?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] uppon2:
I like it too. However I use Double Twist more often
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netban:
Me too :)

Thanks, no scams and never will be. That's why I'm here :cool:

Those sections of the forum are closed for now but will be opened up in the future when needed. I will make a post on our forum when the time comes ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] buzzboy:
Forgive me, but I'm confused.

Is this being developed by the hydrogen team?

Regards.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yabadabadooo:
Part of it yea :cool:

sent from my Galaxy S II
[Galaxy S II Android Development] anshmiester78900:
Ohh plz include Google music its better then Apollo
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yahyoh:
low IO speed :p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] anshmiester78900:
And what is IO sir ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ImpheOtus:
Exactly :P
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yahyoh:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Input/output

http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/I/I_O.html

u can find the IO test in antutu or quadrant :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Siemser:
Please than check out that these sections are not shown up when u r not logged in. At this time it is visible. Please check logged off permissions of forum ;)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netban:
Hehe not to worry my friend, these beta forums are not in use at the moment so the correct permissions are nothing to worry about at this point :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] danalive:
Can't wait for your next release! Are you accepting bug reports here?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] *SanSiro*:
Hmm, forum is down.....:confused:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Siemser:
Since several hours... :eek:

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] anshmiester78900:
Damn man i wanted to try this firmware out
[Galaxy S II Android Development] aceofclubs:
Thanks for the 02062012 version posted a page or two back.

Been having a look and it's pretty nice so far.

----------------------

GTI9100

Hydra H2O 1.2.1

fluxi xx.01_final
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netban:
We are sorry for the forum downtime, we have server issues.

EDIT: Fixed :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yabadabadooo:
Giev update! :D

Oh how i missed that since HyDrOG3N is dead..

sent from my Galaxy S II
[Galaxy S II Android Development] umair9001:
Still looks down..u sure its up..¿¿
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Siemser:
It's already down again. But it was up some hours ago.

What problems are that? Are u working on it meanwhile the downtime?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] clifffhanger:
I was able to download and flash but i'm getting loops which is weirdly directing me back so CWM. I can flash back to 01/06 though.

Other links?

Nevermind, working now. I guess ROM should be saved on the sd card. will not work from phone memory
[Galaxy S II Android Development] netban:
Hi everyone!

Yea we have a bit more down time. Upgrades to the server.

The problem this morning was a DNS problem that has since been fixed.

EDIT: We will get there my friends :)

EDIT 2: We are now back up and running. The network cards have been upgraded and the forum is now accessible ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] *SanSiro*:
Now all we need is a signature banner,

I'll use this one for now! :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mareis1973:
Hey RIZUR, hey Frozen Team

Thanx for giving us another AOKP ROM.

It looks very nice.

I felt free to present your ROM in the German

ANDROID-HILFE.DE forum here under the following Link:

FrozenAOKP

I hope that´s fine for you. Otherwise send me an PN.

Regards from Germany

mareis1973

P.S.: Two Questions is there a mountpointfix like the one on Hydrogenics? ´caus my PlayerPro dosn´t play the music from external SD.

And do you have any Version of Google Play Music which works on this Rom, caus i don´t like Apollo that much?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] clifffhanger:
Mountpoints are fix on 06/02 version. Link is posted a few pages back. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] clifffhanger:
Push this on system/app via Root Explorer
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mareis1973:
What permissions do I have to set?

Thanx in advance :)

Zugestellt per Post
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yabadabadooo:
when will get the ball rolling?

cant wait untill youll drop daily nightlies ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] clifffhanger:
same as the other apps rw-r--r--

---------- Post added at 12:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:15 AM ----------

You said it! Just the latest release and stock rom and kernel, and I'm not even looking for other ROMs to try. :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] anshmiester78900:
Ummm guys apart from the usual bugs of CM9 is there any extra bugs in the build which we can expect . Also is it as fast as CM9.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bajee11:
Can you define fast? are you talking about benchmark?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] clifffhanger:
Hey! where's the download link!!!!!! give me give me!!!!!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yabadabadooo:
Antutu

Quadrant

Dont know it this is good or not. Maybe someone could say smthng to this results.

sent from my Galaxy S II
[Galaxy S II Android Development] clifffhanger:
that's a very descent score for ICS mate. and for quadrant i think it's normal because the device is limited @60mhz.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Mr.Greg:
Don't trust benchmarks. They are not fully compatible with AOKP roms.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] clifffhanger:
Same bugs as CM9 which is mentioned on OP.

Best about the ROM is it's almost the same as the basic AOKP release. This means there's not yet any additional features added. Neat and simple. And the same if not better experience with NetChip's stock kernel.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yahyoh:
no its not good cuz all Aokp builds are slower than cm9 , take a look bro and if some one say aokp not compatible with benchmark he is lying ;);)

all these test are first run ^__^

and i'm still watting for some someone one to make fast aokp as cm9 and still not exist :o:o

btw aokp on my s1 faster than cm9 maybe because it has official aokp :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] xinfinityoO:
omg .. benchmarks again.. do u ppl actually jerk off when u get the highest scores..lol..kidding.. but seriously its a waste..and also cluttering the thread..

back to business..

any eta on build 38.. is netchip still working on it ??
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Siemser:
His github forked repos were updated two days ago. So b38 was out at this time. I think he is working since then on an update.

But twitter he mentioned that he had sold his sgs2... Think he will focus on sgs3 :mad:

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] rzat:
Clean and stable, very smooth. Two things though:

1. Is there a way (script, app...) To disable or set timeout on buttons led on stock kernel. Don't see the point of having them on all the time.

2. I like what Neo did on his ROM with colours. Pure black background and white text. elegant and readable.any easy way of having it on here?

Thanks
[Galaxy S II Android Development] anshmiester78900:
Ohh damn i'm on CM9 really wanted to try aokp rom .. and im sad that is aokp is not as smooth as cm9
[Galaxy S II Android Development] clifffhanger:
1. BLN scripts from Bajee

2. Try using themes. Since this is also an AOKP base ROM, themes from other threads should work here as well. eg. pitch black

---------- Post added at 07:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:48 PM ----------

As you said, this is from your 1st run. I doubt you'll get the same on a long run. I just want to point out that basically, ICS ROMs are still on the process and no stable meaning no bugs ROM has been released yet so benchmarks would not get you anywhere to judge the ROM as to say one is faster than the other :)

---------- Post added at 07:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:50 PM ----------

I too am also using CM9 but so far, i'm fine with netchip's. The best thing on this ROM is the kernel. Rock solid for performance and battery life, but what I like most is that it's not cluttered with options which might get you better in terms of performance or battery life but would cost about 1/4 of your battery just by setting it up and by the time your done and ready for another cycle, another release is out. lol!

---------- Post added at 07:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:55 PM ----------

I think i saw him mentioned that he would wait for a solid stable build release before updating the ROM so I guess he would still release one.

We can always try other ROMs though while waiting if the lastest release is not so much of an ideal build of your taste.