[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
GingerBread

Test results from 20.03.2012:

=> Base ROM was XWLA4 (GB)

Results for SpeedMod / Phenomenal / N.E.A.K. / Siyah / RedPill / stock kernels

Everything is specific to my phone, my "normal" usage and my home location. Most values are exact results, but some are rounded. I usually have wifi, synch (three email accounts, calendar and news), Google Talk and Skype on.

For all custom kernels, I was running on Frankenstein XWLA4 ROM (Modem: XXKL1).

For stock kernels, I was running on the corresponding stock ROM.

Always using the Samsung's standard / stock 1650mAh battery.

For Siyah, as it has many, many configurable settings, I have changed nothing - just default settings.

For N.E.A.K. I tested VR schedule, Lulzactive governor, only enabled sched_mc (and AFTR idle mode) and the rest unchanged defaults.

For RedPill kernel, I tested completely default settings, only changed io sched to sio and governor to conservative.

Here are my current results:

Benchmarks (in Performance governor if available)

[B]Quadrant Standard (3rd run)[/B]

Phenomenal 4.0: 4780
SpeedMod K2-21: 4771
Stock XILA2 kernel: 4259
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 4076
Stock XWKL1 kernel: 4036
Stock XWKK5 kernel: 3899
Stock XWKK2 kernel: 3852

[B]Quadrant Standard 2.0 (best of 3 runs)[/B]

Stock XXLPQ kernel: 4063
N.E.A.K. v1.4: 3860
Siyah v2.6.13: 3692
SpeedMod K2-21: 3576
RedPill rev1.3: 3282
Siyah v3.0beta2: 3276

[B]NenaMark2 (best of 3 runs)[/B]

Stock XILA2 kernel: 54,3
Siyah v2.6.13: 54,2
N.E.A.K. v1.4: 54,2
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 54,2
SpeedMod K2-21: 53,5
RedPill rev1.3: 52,7
Stock XXLPQ kernel: 51,3
Stock XWKK5 kernel: 47,8
Stock XWKK2 kernel: 47,6
Phenomenal 4.0: 44,4
Stock XWKL1 kernel: 38,1

[B]Vellamo (best of 2 runs)[/B]

Stock XXLPQ kernel: 1247
Siyah v2.6.13: 1237
Stock XILA2 kernel: 1225
SpeedMod K2-21: 1224
N.E.A.K. v1.4: 1219
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 1216
Phenomenal 4.0: 1214
Stock XWKL1 kernel: 1173
RedPill rev1.3: 1172
Stock XWKK5 kernel: 1160
Stock XWKK2 kernel: 1080

[B]Linpack (best of 10 runs): Single / Multi thread[/B]

Phenomenal 4.0: 57.342 / 102.346
SpeedMod K2-21: 57.224 / 98.062
N.E.A.K. v1.4: 57.302 / 95.077
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 57.816 / 93.548
Siyah v2.6.13: 57.459 / 92.572
Stock XILA2 kernel: 57.302 / 91.667
RedPill rev1.3: 57.499 / 80.663
Stock XXLPQ kernel: 48.208 / 80.013

[B]CF-Bench (best of 2 runs): Native / Java / Overall score[/B]

Stock XWLA4 kernel: 11396 / 3539 / 6681
Phenomenal 4.0: 11522 / 3409 / 6654
Siyah v2.6.13: 11441 / 3427 / 6632
N.E.A.K. v1.4: 11400 / 3374 / 6584
SpeedMod K2-21: 11428 / 3355 / 6584
RedPill rev1.3: 11271 / 3229 / 6445
Stock XILA2 kernel: 11285 / 3187 / 6426
Stock XXLPQ kernel: 10862 / 3044 / 6171

[B]AnTuTu (1st run)[/B]

N.E.A.K. v1.4: 6177
Stock XILA2 kernel: 6110
Stock XXLPQ kernel: 6075
Siyah v2.6.13: 6012
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 6009
SpeedMod K2-21: 4986
Phenomenal 4.0: 4966
RedPill rev1.3: 4832

Battery stats

[B]Night use (wifi, synch, Talk and Skype on)[/B]

RedPill rev1.3: Battery loss of 0,68% per hour, Awake: 4,8%, Deep sleep: 93%
Phenomenal 4.0 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,82% per hour, Awake: 5,6%, Deep sleep: 93%
SpeedMod K2-21: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 6,0%, Deep sleep: 93%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 0,95% per hour, Awake: 9,2%, Deep sleep: 90%
N.E.A.K. v1.4: Battery loss of 1,02% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 92%
XILA2: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 11,6%, Deep sleep: 88%
Siyah v2.6.13: Battery loss of 1,30% per hour, Awake: 9,8%, Deep sleep: 89%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Awake: 9,9%, Deep sleep: 89%

[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]

RedPill rev1.3: Battery loss of 1,76% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,8%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,59%
SpeedMod K2-21: Battery loss of 1,91% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,7%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,72%
Phenomenal 4.0 Extreme: Battery loss of 2,05% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,6%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,85%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 2,19% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,97%
N.E.A.K. v1.4: Battery loss of 2,26% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 11,4% => loss*(1-screen): 2,00%
Siyah v2.6.13: Battery loss of 2,29% per hour, Wifi: 91,6%, Awake: 19,9%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,04%
XILA2: Battery loss of 2,42% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,20%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 2,37% per hour, Wifi: 81,9%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 5,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,23%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 2,58% per hour, Wifi: 96,1%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,35%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 2,71% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,42%

[B](*)[/B] In order to get a value, which allows to compare test results with different screen on times for mixed usage battery tests, I tried to „normalized“ the battery loss per hour with the following formula:
[U]loss*(1-screen):[/U] battery loss in % (per hours) * (100% - screen on time in %)
So, it would be the battery loss in % (per hour) for the screen off time.
That is how a kernel with the same battery loss per hour will get a better/lower value, if it has more screen on time. (And the other way round.)