yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Jeboo v1.3:

Good battery life in mixed usage.

Jeboo v1.3 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 14,8%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%

It's a little bit worse than for PhilZ-touch kernel, but slightly better than for SiyahKernel.

Let's check latest DorimanX kernel now ... have to prepare something for the next kernel test.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v7.46:

I just flashed DorimanX kernel v7.46 on my XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2.

It is stable and smooth on my phone ... but feels a little less smooth than on PhilZ-touch and Jeboo kernel.

My custom boot animation is gone (NeatROM boot animation worked fine on PhilZ-touch and Jeboo kernel before) => EDIT: Could be re-enabled by flashing an "enable_custom_bootani.zip" :good:

Live thumbnail video player works, but the thumbnails which were live before are now black, and the others are still static (like before).

And I heard for the first time the crackling noise when playing music while screen is off.

Never have heard this before ... on previous DorimanX kernel versions. => EDIT: After a third reboot, cracking noise is gone :fingers-crossed:

The rest seems to work fine so far (wifi, bluetooth, 4.2 Gallery, video playing, camera, video recording, GPS, etc.).

Let's check its battery life now.
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [04 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Is Nightmare more performance or battery oriented?

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] surfingnoob:
Re: [04 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

It should be the perfect mix between those two because it gives you performance only when you need it. But check the dorimanx thread to be sure.
[Galaxy S II General] Emre9110:
My jeboo v1.3 night use kernel result.Same option with here. One different thing is kernel :D

Battery loss of 0,20% per hour, Awake: 0.8%

Compered with philiz 4.00 b22, Something causes wakelock at jeboo kernel. vbus_present 21m 19s. There is no vbus_present at philiz. What is vbus_present ?

SyncloopWakelock 9m 5s. What is that ?

Jeboo 200 mhz 23m 42s but philiz 200 mhz 1m 46s.

All these are cause %2 percent at 10h night use.
[Galaxy S II General] jackbauer2411:
That's a good question, would like to know that, too. Had this wakelock today, too, but battery life was extremely good nevertheless...
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [04 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Vbus is charger, when you hit 100% take charger out and reboot to get rid of it:)

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=23428622

*NeatROM*

---------- Post added at 06:59 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:54 AM ----------

https://github.com/asksven/BetterBatteryStats-Knowledge-Base/wiki/SyncLoopWakeLock

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v7.46:

Moderate battery life in night use.

DorimanX v7.46 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,61% per hour, Awake: 1,9%

MediaScannerService was about 1m 57s ... on other kernels it was about 56s.

And more alarms ... maybe because of the CORTEX BRAIN service.

Let's check its battery life in mixed usage now.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v7.46:

Very good battery life in mixed usage.

DorimanX v7.46 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,36% per hour, Wifi: 13,6%, Awake: 11,9%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,22%

It's slightly better the PhilZ-touch v4.00b34.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] cripubu:
Sorry, but did you try the refresh button in Google Mail? It always says Not connected, although i am perfectly connected with internet. I have to go to settings, Google account and there I have to syncronize. Very strange.

Went back to Philz and everything is fine.
[Galaxy S II General] Emre9110:
Picture says %12.9. Your post says %13.6 about wifi :) Why they are different :D
[Galaxy S II General] AllSeeyinEye:
Re: [05 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

You magically gained some extra juice :what:

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Sorry, I don't use Gmail ... I like stock EMail app and widget.

And this works fine :good:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I took the screenshoot and waited for the battery to go 1% lower.

Then I used the time values of this moment, which was some minutes (5-10 minutes) later than the screenshot.

That's the reason for the difference.
[Galaxy S II General] Emre9110:
Thanks for reply :) Can u test dori v7.45 before test philiz 4.01 ? Dori v7.46 has some problem which you encountered.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Usually I like to test new kernel versions ... so latest is always the one I prefer.

But if I have some time (before new kernels are released), and some users report that an older kernel version is "better", then I may test it.

Now I am re-testing v7.46 to verify my results. After this re-test, I will decide which kernel to test next.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-test DorimanX v7.46:

Nearly the same battery life in night use like on first run.

DorimanX v7.46 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,62% per hour, Awake: 1,7%

So my system is still stable and no need for updating the first post.

EDIT:

Now my thumbnails in video player are nearly all "live" again. (Only one slef-recorded video on the internal sd card is still static.)

So the thumbnails take a lot of time to get "live". And connecting/disconnecting the phone to a PC in Mass Storage Mode seems to have influence on these ... maybe that's why all videos on external sd card are now live.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] -iNCEPTiON-:
seems better when i read 7.46 changelog :) , i think Siyah Kernel wont be updated any sooner or may be gokhanmoral has stopped developing that kernel :(
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ-touch v4.01:

I flashed PhilZ-touch kernel v4.01 on my XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2.

It is very stable and smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine (wifi, bluetooth, camera, gallery, live thumbnail video player, GPS, etc.).

Good battery life in night use.

PhilZ-touch v4.01 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,54% per hour, Awake: 1,9%

It's nearly the same as for previous kernel version.

So I expect nearly same battery life in mixed usage too.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [07 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Just woke up with 100% still after 8 hours on Philz 4.01:)

Couldn't stay off my phone long enough to try to beat my 12 hours record. :D

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] MICa.fighter:
governors?

thanks for the topic! im doing a similar test right now:P one note:

as u already know different kernels use different governors as default, maybe different freq/volt settings too. it might give more realistic result if you use the same governor with same settings (freqs/volts/and gov related settings) with all kernel. eliminating this variable would give more realistic results by comparing the differences between kernels.

one more thing: performance and battery life doesnt necessary exclude each other. you can achieve both if u set up kernel governors corretly. for ex i use lulzactiveq for screen on, which scales up fast but only if the demand is high.if there is no demand it will scale down fast. in addition i use a consvervative wich scales down really fast for screen off-> performance when screen on, good standby (phone goes to deepsleep fast) on screen off.
[Galaxy S II General] zg_trotter:
Me too :laugh: , I turn off wifi and data and 100% still standing :good:
[Galaxy S II General] igos2:
Re: [07 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Let me understand, if philz kernel is 100% stock + cwm, how do you expect any difference in battery usage between all the versions based on LS8 stock kernel?

Using Tapatalk2 on my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I don't expect any difference.

As long as it's stock kernel, the battery life should be (nearly) the same.

So it take it as kind of verification tests, if my system is still stable or drifted into better/worse battery life.

Next kernel test will be with a custom kernel again ... maybe new DorimanX v7.47 :confused:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ-touch v4.01:

Moderate battery life in mixed usage.

PhilZ-touch v4.01 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 17,0%, Awake: 12,9%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%

It's slightly worse than on previous kernel version, but nearly the same as for SiyahKernel v6.0b4.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [07 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

You never know?

I'm certainly, and i'm sure many others are, interested in seeing if there is a difference between versions even if technically they should yeild very similar results:)

*NeatROM* My Battery Guide http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=35061392
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v7.47:

I just flashed DorimanX kernel v7.47 on my XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2.

It is stable and smooth on my phone ... but ... I already had one SOD (while charging and screen off), and it feels a little bit less smooth as on stock/PhilZ or Jeboo kernel.

Everything else seems to work (wifi , bluetooth, GPS, camera, gallery, video player ... but again without "live" thumbnails).

Now preparing the battery tests.
[Galaxy S II General] undead_assault:
hmmm, I have installed Dorimanx 747 on MilitantRom 1.7 which based on NeatROM 4.2.

My video player is working correctly (under the thumbnail tab). It is moving like a gif.

Is there something you disabled?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Last time I flashed Dorimanx kernel, I had the same "issue" for the live thumbnails.

But after some time (1-2 days) the thumbnails were "live".

I don't know why ... I guess it could be related with connecting with USB in Mass Storage Mode and MediaScanner ... anyway. It's only a minor thing and also happens on other kernels.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v7.47:

Moderate battery life in night use.

DorimanX v7.47 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,61% per hour, Awake: 1,7%

It's nearly the same battery life as for previous kernel version ... only slightly better deep sleep ratio.

Let's check its battery life in mixed usage now.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] ysf_droid+:
[ROM][XWLS8 4.1.2][05/02] Chameleon v3.0 Samsung/AOKP hybrid

pls if you can test this rom ( Chameleon v3.0 Samsung/AOKP hybrid ) i m now on neatrom 4.2 lite but i want to flash this chameleon rom pls show me the battery life result ...thanks
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Usually I only flash and run stock ROMs.

NeatROM is kind of an exception, as it is stock ROM, only with some bloatware (system apps) removed and sime nice mods.

But I don't want to flash and test any other ROM ... I want to stick to Sammy's ROMs or alternatively to NeatROM.

This thread was ment to compare different kernels based on stock ROMs, not to compare different (custom) ROMs, as the difference between custom ROMs are too big IMO ... so it's too hard to get reliable / comparable test results.
[Galaxy S II General] GoldGanja:
New PhilZ

New PhilZ Kernel out both XWLSD and XWLS8

More kernel to test mate! :D
[Galaxy S II General] -iNCEPTiON-:
PhilZ Latest Kernel is out , 4.22 , i would just flash that today :) and see the results , i was not amazed by Siyah Kernel on LS8 :( So i will wait for an update for that, hopefully it will be soon :(
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v7.47:

Good battery life in mixed usage.

DorimanX v7.47 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 11,8%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%

But it's worse than for previous kernel version.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Stock XWLSD:

I flashed stock XWLSD (for Nordic regions) with PhilZ-touch kernel v4.22.

It is very stable and smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine.

Very good battery life in night use.

XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,0%

It's the best battery life for a stock ROM on my phone so far.

If its battery life in mixed usage is also that good, this (or XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3) will be my new base ROM for further kernel tests.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] bogdan1980:
battery is good on lsd, 1 h screen time, battery remain 90%.

If i pull battery out, bootloop. In rest is seems quite good.

Speed is awsome, if i take wife s2 with 404 + dorimanx 5.92, overclock at 1.4cpu, mine at default( def kernel) is faster in anyting then her, expecially when browsing and opening pages, its way ahead mine.
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [09 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Now this will be interesting to see how NeatROM compares to stock.

Should be very similar but looking forward to it:)

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] igos2:
Re: [09 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

+1 !

Using Tapatalk2 on my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] komsa:
Let's wait for the new Speedmod results :)
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [09 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Speedmod?

Edit, found it, flashed it! :D

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] -iNCEPTiON-:
Have you frozen any apps or removed any Bloatware??
[Galaxy S II General] tonovcp:
Re: [09 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

+1
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, will post screenshots of my disabled apps in a few minutes.

EDIT:

Here are screenshots of my manually disabled apps:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Just saw and downloaded latest SpeedMod kernel :fingers-crossed:

Will add it to my kernels-to-test list.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Stock XWLSD:

Good battery life in mixed usage.

XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,53% per hour, Wifi: 20,8%, Awake: 13,2%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%

But it's a little bit worse than for stock XWLS8 ... ok, I had some more wifi connects/disconnects (no continous wifi connection). So the wifi running ratio was higher compared to the battery test for stock XWLS8.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] Jeremy:
Hi it_ler.

Is there any particular reason why you'd freeze gmail? Does it drain battery?

If so, what is a good, battery-friendly alternative for checking of email, particularly gmail?

Thanks :)
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re: [09 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Yes, as any other email app.

I prefer stock email app and widget. So no need for another email app IMO.

K9 is an alternative email app BTW.

I recommend to use only one email app for all your email accounts ... and use only manual sync.
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [09 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Exactly what i do!

Stock Email + manual sync:thumbup:

Also Google+, facebook, twitter etc if i need to go on them i just go through browser, so get rid of apps like that that are constantly refreshing, using data and keeping phone awake!

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] pilgrim011:
But only if you live in a desert, with charger available once every few days. If not, you should just enjoy your phone and receive mails as soon as they arrive on server. Same with other apps. Just saying.:p
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
It's everyone's own decision IMO.

I like to have long battery life (even outside of a desert, the current is not for free).

And I also like to have the "control" ... I want to pull my mails, and don't like to be "pushed" by others :D

But yes, everybody has other needs and ways of doing things ... and that's great :good:
[Galaxy S II General] Jeremy:
Re: [09 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Really wonder how a no frills old school kernel like speedmod would fare against the new kids on the block. Hardcore has been around since the beginning of sgs2.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
+1

As soon as my current tests with PhilZ-touch on XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3 are finished, I will test SpeedMod kernel :fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3:

I flashed XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3 with PhilZ-touch kernel v4.28.

It is very stable and very smooth on my phone.

Everything seems to work fine ... except the *#1234# code - it starts SuperSU now instead of showing the phone info.

Good battery life in night use.

NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%

It's a little bit worse than for XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2, but it was the first battery cycle and it was a "short" night. Best over-night result for XWLS8 was on third battery cycle and in a "long" night.

So I may have to re-test this ROM too ... to get better comparable results.

Let's check its battery life in mixed usage now.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] Titan9119:
Re: [10 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Is Dorimanx kernel 7.47 better than 7.46 based on battery life (wifi)?
[Galaxy S II General] buzzing_bee:
Currently I use gmail app to view my gmail, but as of now after read your post, I turn off the sync and notifications...is it enough to make my battery life longer??

I have used the XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2 and Philz Kernel, but I notice that there's too mauch memory consumed than I use the XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0...so I changed to OmegaROM v19.2 right now.

I tried to apply your suggestions to use airplane mode when not using internet, turn off all sound, use darker wallpaper, and use lower brightness.

And it makes my battery lafi longer than before.

Thanks man :good:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
1. Yes, changing from push to pull mail will reduce the wakelocks and alarms for email and lead to better battery life ... if you don't pull your mails too frequently ;)

2. You're welcome :highfive:
[Galaxy S II General] AbyssTrion:
AW: [10 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Thats a feature of SuperSU :) It's in the App-Description on Google Play.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
But (I think) it showed the phone info on stock ROM ... even with SuperSU app installed ... maybe I am mixing something up.

(I flashed stock XWLSD first, then flashed PhilZ-touch kernel in stock recovery later.)

Anyway, it's not a "real" issue IMO.

But thanks for the info.
[Galaxy S II General] AbyssTrion:
AW: [10 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

No Problem, read that on the NeatROM Thread, so..well who cares :D
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [10 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

I tried it yesterday.

Everything worked, no bugs.

Didn't give it proper full cycle so can't comment on battery life but it was fast scrolling but was juddery at slow scrolling.

Benchmarks were lower on quadrant and antutu than Philz but not by much for those interested in benchmarks.

Quadrant 4100 v 4300

Antutu 9700 v 10200

I think with a tweak on the scrolling it will be good.

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] ShowerPower:
Great work
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3:

Very good battery life in mixed usage.

NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%

It's a little bit worse than the best result for XWLS8 NeatROm Lite v4.2, but better than for stock XWLSD ROM.

That's seems to be my new base ROM for further kernel tests ... I will verify my results by a re-test of latest PhilZ-touch kernel before flashing the next custom kernel.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ-touch v4.31:

I flashed PhilZ-touch kernel v4.31 on my XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3.

No difference to the previous kernel version, except the new features in CWM recovery.

Moderate battery life in night use.

PhilZ-touch v4.31 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 1,9%

It's a little bit worse than for the previous kernel version ... might be normal "noise".

After mixed usage battery test, I will decide if I re-do the tests or just continue testing custom kernels.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
that speedmod kernel test would be nice read here :p
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ-touch v4.31:

Good battery life in mixed usage.

PhilZ-touch v4.31 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,42% per hour, Wifi: 14,0%, Awake: 12,1%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,28%

This is nearly the same as for PhilZ-touch kernel on XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2.

So I think I have a stable base ROM to continue my kernel tests.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] NoRulesForMe:
Mr. It_Ler :angel:

I just want to say THANK YOU for this Thread of your's

Every post you make for EVERY Kernel of course is such a helpful Basis for me what kernel too choose or Try for my self

Thank you Mate Keep it up and more Power... GODBLESS :highfive: :good:

What A hard working person just to help us all in testing kernels :victory:
[Galaxy S II General] zg_trotter:
Hi guys :)

I just want to say hello....to all of you :o

Lucky me coz I don't have any problem or something like that, I'm just curious and I like to try something new and better :) ...so last few weeks I can't stop reading posts and tips in it ;)

You are such a great community and you share lot of help for all of us with all this kernel tests (tnx It_Ler) and great ROM's ( THANK YOU SALE ).

Keep going and BIG thank to ALL :good:

Phone: SGS2 (GT-I9100)

ROM: XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2

Kernel: SpeedMod K5-1

Extras: XWLS8_Aroma_Mods_v4.2b
[Galaxy S II General] anson162002:
Re: [11 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Which kernel suitable for gs2 cm10.1?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
As I only test stock / Sammy based ROMs, it's either the wrong question or the wrong thread to ask.

I recommend to check the ROM thread ... I think there is a discussion thread dediated to CM10.1.

There you might get quicker and better answers.

Good luck !
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SpeedMod K5-1:

I flashed SpeedMod K5-1 kernel on my XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3.

It is very stable and smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine (camera, gallery, video player, wifi, bluetooth, GPS, etc.).

Good "old" CWM recovery is back ... but I have get used to the new "touch" CWM recovey of PhilZ kernel now ...

Good battery life in night use.

SpeedMod K5-1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,61% per hour, Awake: 2,1%

It's slightly better than for PhilZ-touch kernel v4.31.

Let's check its battery life in mixed usage.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] AbyssTrion:
I also installed SpeedMod Kernel today, pretty impressed by the Battery Life so far.

Would it be possible to get a List of your Disabled Apps? (Not Screenshots, just a .txt or so :D )
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Here are the screenshots of my manually disabled apps => http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=37783486&postcount=1868

As I am already getting in trouble with my wife, that I spend too much time with my smartphone (and PC), I won't create a text file with the filenames of all disabled apps.

If you need such a text file, please create it yourself.
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
hehehe It_ler , same problems here too ;). but mate the link you gave does not have the screenshots. looks like attachments missing.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
All screenshots/attachments were there ... I can see and download them.

Try to close the browser and restart it. Or clear browser cache.

Can you see other screenshots/atachments in my posts?

I usually attach all screenshots the same way ... from my PC via browser directly to xda-developers site.
[Galaxy S II General] zanderzone:
I can see the attachment, maybe some issues with you browser mate