yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Ohh ... you hit me ... and it hurts :crying:

No, unfortunately I don't have a SGS3 ... my financial manager has rejected my request for it:(

So I will have to stay on the (still excellent working :good:) SGS2.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme:

Slightly worse batetry life in mixed usage.

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,8%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,47%

Nearly the same battery life as CF-Root on XWLPX. Hmm ... maybe XWLPX does not like to be extremely undervolted?!

Will try something else and report back.
[Galaxy S II General] citytrader:
If you have SGS2, why will you buy the shoe phone SGS3!?... :laugh:
[Galaxy S II General] yas44co:
It seems that Dorimanx use I9300 Driver sources

Dear It_ler

Can we have other Kernels in your perfect test in another base

like AOKP & Cm9 base:

FluxiXXKernel (good Battery and Performance)

ShunAndromeda

Thoravukk

VokuKernal

DarkNight

---------- Post added at 10:05 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:50 AM ----------

Its not square which you have Phno in Extreme and Dorimanx in normal mod:(

while both have similar kind of Battery profile

please set Dorimanx BatteryProfile in CWM and put changeUpdate:)

thats right you put in default settings but pls compare in equal circumstance:cool:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks for the suggestions:

FluxiXXKernel => not for Sammy ROMs

ShunAndromeda => good idea, I will consider it for testing

Thoravukk => not for Sammy ROMs

VokuKernal => already on my Kernels-to-test list in post #2

DarkNight => Do you mean Dark Knight?! Please post a link to the kernel thread.

As I can not and don't want to test all kernels available for the SGS2, I try to focus on the most "popular", stable, in XDA available kernels for stock ROMs.

Feel free to start your own tests and post your results.

EDIT:

Correct, but if the default profile is as bad as in DorimanX 3.2 case, I don't consider testing another profile of the same kernel.

Additionally, I do not want to test the same kernel for each available profile (profile is a set of changed settings). That's why I stated in the first post, that I am testing all kernels with complete default settings/no customizations/no "manual" UV/UC/tweaking/etc..

I like the character of "out-of-the-box" solutions ;-)

Feel free to test and compare kernels in various profiles and share your results.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
After bad results for DorimanX 3.2 kernel, I flashed Phenomenal v5.5 Extreme again to re-do my battery tests and verify my system.

Hope that everything is fine and my system is still stable with nearly same results/battery life.
[Galaxy S II General] CamoGeko:
Should be mate, you just have to let your system settle in again for few days.

Sent from my 80GB CyanogenMOD 9 + Siyah ICS powered beast. Booya!!
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
A few days on the same kernel ... I'll try :D
[Galaxy S II General] CamoGeko:
Lol, I know that's a lot to ask of you mate but give it a go :p

Sent from my 80GB CyanogenMOD 9 + Siyah ICS powered beast. Booya!!
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Ok, depending on the first battery test results, I will keep the same "reference" kernel at least for two days ... that's all I can commit now :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II General] CamoGeko:
Yes that's what should be done, 2-3 days for kernel to settle and only then do the battery runs. :D

Sent from my 80GB CyanogenMOD 9 + Siyah ICS powered beast. Booya!!
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 5.5 Extreme, first battery cycle: It has a slightly better battery life than my last battery test for the same kernel.

So, my system seems to be "stable" :p

Will keep this kernel for this weekend and compare the results from day to day ... if I can recognize a difference.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Flashed N.E.A.K. v2.0.6:

1. I recognize freezes and reboot issues for Mobile Odin and TriangleAway app.

When I start Mobile Odin (Lite) app or TriangleAway app, the phone freezes or it reboots directly.

Wiping cache and Dalvik cache could not solve the issue for me.

2. Smooth as expected.

Now running battery tests.
[Galaxy S II General] Phil3759:
Hope you give LPG a test soon

We all feel it is a winner, battery wise, maybe you will confirm it
[Galaxy S II General] AndroidGX:
Interesting... gonna flash it and stay you guys tuned ! :cool:

For me the best battery friendly kernel is still XWLPD with Tegrak undervolting. Will do my same settings on this LPG.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I wanted to wait for Android 4.0.4 for SGS2, but I will also check XWLPG.

Just finish my current kernel tests and then I will make up my mind about the next stock ROM/kernel for flashing.

Please share your results/experiences ... here in this thread if you want.

You are always welcome ;)
[Galaxy S II General] Phil3759:
Thanks,

All reports from rom / mod cookers say LPG is more stable and best battery

I compare to LP7, LPD and LPF: no FC, battery clearly better

With no wifi and data: deep sleep 99% overnight
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I am curious now :eek:

Let me finish my current tests and then I will test stock XWLPG.
[Galaxy S II General] eric-filth:
1- Good work. I like benchmarks. For me benchmarks reflect situation of your phone. Low numbers = something wrong.

I have one thread in my forum from brazil with benchmarks too.

translate.google.com.br/translate?s...res-custom-kernels-fluxi-xx-02-a.html&act=url

2- Low numbers with neak and speedmod on antutu is because mc_sched 1

3- i suggest you input Basemark ES 2 in you benchmark list.

Enviado de meu GT-I9100 usando o Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] bervin:
samsung is gonna start using 4.0.4 soon?
[Galaxy S II General] alquimista74:
Great threat
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
To be honest: I have no idea.

It was just a suggestion/my wish, as Samsung is already publishing Android 4.0.4 on the SGS3.

Why not port it to the previous SGS2 model?!

But this may take a while, so I will try another Android 4.0.3 version (XWLPG) on my phone.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks for your infos.

Good work on your kernel benchmarks.

I have already visited your site.

As I am not very keen on benchmark results (IMO real life experience is more important), I do not really want to add another benchmark app to my list.

But thanks for the suggestion.

Feel free to comment my tests/test results and share your experiences here.
[Galaxy S II General] drahmed86:
Does phenomenal (speedmod) kernel work on RR 2.7???

grateful in advance
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
No, Phenomenal is based on SpeedMod kernel and this is for stock/Sammy ROMs only.
[Galaxy S II General] drahmed86:
thanx amillion for ur real help

but ahave just aquestion:why didnt u give the custom roms ashot and tell us ur beneficial experience??and still insist on sammy roms??
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Tried different things to come back to previous battery life in mixed usage with Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPX ... without success.

So, I am restoring my last nandroid backup of XWLPX with CF-Root v5.6 for XWLPX now.

If I am back on prevoius battery life, then I will try Phenomenal again.

If not, I will go back to XWLPT ROM ... fortunately I have still a nandroid backup of XWLPT with Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on my sd card :good:
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
+1

NeatROM is a good start, you'll like it OP as it is stock sammy with tweaks and i get around 6700 on antutu and thats without tweaking it
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks for your suggestions.

But I really like to stay on stock/Sammy ROMs.

I have already read some custom ROM threads and there ae some very intersting features.

If you want to have test results for that custom ROMs, you will have to do it yourself.
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
last i installed battery widget monito pro in my phone

my kernel is phenomenal ics 6.1 extreme the best moth¨% FUC¨%&¨%&¨of the world (LOL)

i,m running xwlpx simplistic rom +sgs3 mod

my battery usage in 3g all time whats app , exchange , sync , gmail and facebook receive alerts 96% deep sleep and...

0,53 % / H battery 8hs testing night use

the 3:03 am 5:08 am 1% lost battery

unbelieveble

i installing xwlpx tuga power team and test today
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Option 1: Back on XWLPX with CF-Root v5.6 for XWLPX => Worse battery life even after two battery cycles.

So I am on option 2: Restoring my old nandorid backup of XWLPT ROM with Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme.

After my re-tests of this system, I will decide about my future base ROM.
[Galaxy S II General] drahmed86:
i know earlier that u'll step back to the fantastic combination of LPT and phenom. kernel

but waiting ur valuable experience for the new kernels.

My Regards
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, I will continue my kernel tests, but first I have to come back a stable base system/ROM.

Otherwise the test results would not be reliable, and that's what I want for a better comparison.
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
+1 here too!

lt_ler: can you make an exception for testing some version NeatROM Still it is because it is the Original Samsung rom with little mods?

we cant test it because we want (your kernel test thread) your test results for that? and i would like to know if that NeatROM XWLPT have better battery life that stock XWLPT? that would be very nice to know? what other users thinks for this?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Good suggestion.

ATM I really don't want to flash any custom ROM.
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
I realized that when you use the phone it takes +1 hour down using "ma"

screen off sync +3 g + 6 hours without use on screen, 9, 11 or 15 ,17 "ma" screen on five minutes on screen next hour scrren off, sync 3g use 55, 34, 70

"ma" I really do not understand

it_ler do you know about this?

(sorry my english)
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I don't uderstand what you mean.

"ma" = milli ampere ?!

Then you have an app (such as Battery Monitor Widget) which shows/computes the actual current for discharging the battery.

And in different times, with different usage your phone has different discharging current.

Is that what you mean?

I can tell nothing new or more about it.

IMO you have to check a long period of time to get proper values for the discharing current.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Oh ... I am no longer a Senior Member :crying:

I am a Recognized Contributor now :o

Upps ... I have to change my signature :cool:
[Galaxy S II General] drahmed86:
my sincere congrats!! u really up to it.......
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
If you use NeatROM/Wanamlite ROM you will have everything you have on stock, it looks exactly the same, it just has tweaks so it would be great to see the performance and battery difference it really makes by comparing stock LPX with NeatROM LPX and Wanamlite ROM LPX.

It would show people if there really is benefits to flashing a custom ROM (from a performance and battery stand point)

It would be a very intriguing and interesting test for new people and more experienced people alike.

I really want to see the difference!
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
yes milli ampere, ok sorry my english which the better soft for monitor battery discharging ???

i realized using the phone for a while! go to screen off the next 30 minutes to 1 hour is much higher use Ma, with 2 hours down de ma
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
The discharging current in ma is always a kind of "snapshot".

So don't trust in these values to much.

I prefer checking and comparing the battery loss in % per hour.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Ok, so just do the test on your phone and feel free to post your results here.
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
yes thanks

include in your tests kernel dorimanx please is a good kernel
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks for the suggestion.

Latest DorimanX kernel is already on my kernels-to-test list.
[Galaxy S II General] _Sale_:
Congratulations mate. You deserve it

Cheers
[Galaxy S II General] Siberian Tiger:
It was about time :)

Congrats !!!
[Galaxy S II General] bgn9000:
Recognized your work :)

That's nice ;)
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
it_ler please include in your test New

Shun Andromeda Kernel

Version 2.0.9d / CWM only ICS 4.x and CM10 ROM

1/ Phenomal tweaks for memory and LCD voltages (thanks @@fenomeno83)
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
It is already on my “kernels-to-test" list.

But thanks for the suggestion.
[Galaxy S II General] WhoIsJohnGalt1979:
hey congratulations brother!!!!!

it was swell to see you with the RC header, excellent, long time due, good luck:)
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I am on the right way again ...

After restoring old nanadroid backups, after re-checking all settings, after re-checking all apps, after wiping cache and Dalvik cache, after some battery cycles ... I think I have a stable base system again.

Will wait for the mixed usage battery test to finish, then I decide if I stay on XWLPT ROM as base or give XWLPX another try.

EDIT:

After wiping, battery life seems to be nearly back on prevoius results.

So I re-flashed Pre-Rooted XWLPX ROM with SiyahKernel v4.1.5.

With its discrete kernel wakelock stats (enabled option in ExTweaks), I want to examine the BBS results in detail.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SiyahKernel v4.1.5:

Very stable and smooth on my phone.

Everything seems to work fine on my stock XWLPX ROM so far.

Benchmark reslts are OK.

Battery life in night use is good - very good deep sleep ratio.

Very few wlan wakelocks compared to other kernels (such as stock and SpeedMod based).

EDIT:

Good battery life in mixed usage too.

Siyah v4.1.5: Battery loss of 1,69% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,3%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,52%
[Galaxy S II General] txemix:
I had also similar results, for whatever reason Phenomenal and LPX are a bad combination, then switched to Siyah and had much better results.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I read something about CPU frequency issues of SpeedMod K3-31 on XWLPX ROM.

And this is the kernel base for Phenomenal.

But I could not yet determine the cause of the reduced battery life of this kernel on XWLPX.

I am still checking and re-testing this combination ... just on one or two battery cycles :fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme:

Good batetry life in night use.

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,76% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%

But I want to see its battery life in mixed usage.
[Galaxy S II General] citytrader:
It_Ier, I stongly suggest you to test LPY from Wanam, is an Argentinian Firmware and in my particular case, never had a ROM like that, 4G is working fantastic and the battery is another world, no ROM till now has the battery life in my phone like LPY and the combination at the moment with Phenomenal Extreme is superb, never had my phone at 65% of battery level with 21h 12m of phone use till now, maybe is in my phone...
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme:

I give it up - no chance to get good battery life on XWLPX stock ROM.

Worse battery life in mixed usage than for SiyahKernel.

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,74% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,6%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,56%

Now I test another kernel ... maybe CF-Root for XWLPX again, and then I will continue with other custom kernels.
[Galaxy S II General] drahmed86:
+100
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
for me is the same, xwlpx Simplistic V, night use in my case 3g all time whats app, facebook ,gmail sync on have 0, 5 or 0,6%/h but in mixed usage worse bad 2,5 3,5% (in xwlpt/u) 2 , 2,5%/h)

i dont like xwlpx ....
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
Using chameleon ROM. ou still suggest Phenomenal or Siyah now?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
On XWLPT, Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme had best battery life on my phone.

But on XWLPX, Phenomenal got worse battery life ... I am not sure about the real cause of it.

That's why I am testing other kernels on stock XWLPX ROM right now.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
CF-Root for XWLPX:

On first run nearly the same battery life in night use as for the Pre-Rooted XWLPX.

XWLPX (CF-Root XWLPX): Battery loss of 0,85% per hour, Awake: 6,3%, Deep sleep: 93%

If its battery life in mixed usage is nearly the same as before too, I will continue my kernel tests on this base.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
CF-Root for XWLPX:

Its battery life in mixed usage is slightly worse than before.

XWLPX (CF-Root XWLPX): Battery loss of 1,85% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,67%

So I will continue my kernel tests on this base.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Dorimanx v5.82:

I just flashed Dorimanx v5.82 on my XWLPX stock ROM.

Everything seems to work fine so far ... and many, many settings in ExTweaks.

Running on completely default settings.

Benchmarks are OK, the system feels very smooth.

Now I will have a look at its battery life.
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
Damn, New Chameleon is LPX. Not sure i want to upgrade if we cant find a decent kernel for it.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Dorimanx v5.82:

Moderate battery life in night use.

Dorimanx v5.82: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,2%, Deep sleep: 93%

I think that the "Cortexbrain" (which in enabled by default) causes some (alarm) wakelocks. These are significantly higher than on other kernels.

Will check its battery life in mixed usage and report back.
[Galaxy S II General] joedalton_tpu:
Stock kernel is best for performance, but for balance using (battery life, performance,....), Siyah, Speedmod, Phenomenal are suitable choices, in my case Neatrom Lite 3.3+ Phenomenal Extrem 6.1.:good:
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
It_Ler i read in Dori.. Forum

people saying dorimanx 5.78 is the best kernel in battery use

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=31925979&postcount=6852
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Dorimanx v5.82:

Worse battery life in mixed usage.

Dorimany v5.82: Battery loss of 1,98% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,2%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,78%

It is not very battery friendly with completely default settings on my phone.

So I will have to continue my tests ... and will also test newer versions of this kernel.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Stock XWLPW:

I flashed stock XWLPW ROM (DBT = German version) with PhilZ-cwm6 kernel for XWLPW, which is a rooted stock kernel (similar to CF-Root kernels).

Everything works fine, very stable and smooth on my phone.

I can not recognize any significant difference in functionality compared to XWLPX ROM.

Its benchmark results are similar ... in some tests a little bit worse than for XWLPT and XWLPX.

Now testing its battery life.
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
DM kernel fo me
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, it's already on my "kernels-to-test" list.

Have you made good experiences with this kernel?
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
Yeah. Good for me with Chameleon ROM.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Stock XWLPW:

Good battery life in night use.

XWLPW: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 6,3%, Deep sleep: 93%

Let's check its battery life in mixed usage.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Stock XWLPW:

Also good battery life in mixed usage.

XWLPW: Battery loss of 1,79% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,5%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,61%

Similar to XWLPT and XWLPX.

So I think about testing Phenomenal 6.1. Extreme on XWLPW stock ROM ... just to check this combination.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPW:

I flashed Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPW stock ROM.

Everything seems to work fine so far.

It is stable and smooth on my phone.

Its benchmarks are quite good.

But I want to see its battery life in comparision to Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPT and XWLPX stock ROMs.
[Galaxy S II General] potay1111:
Good
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPW:

Worst battery life in night use for Phenomenal on my phone.

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme (XWLPW): Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%

Deep sleep ratio is Ok, so I think the battery stats chip was not settled down correctly.

Maybe I will need to re-test on a second battery cycle.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPW:

Very good battery life in mixed usage.

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme (XWLPW): Battery loss of 1,58% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,6%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,41%

I think I should re-test on a second battery cycle to verify my results.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPW:

Better battery life in night use in second battey cycle.

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme (XWLPW): Battery loss of 0,76% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 93%

Nearly the same battery life in night use as Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPX.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPW:

Worse battery life in mixed usage.

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme (XWLPW): Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%

So I flash XWLPX back on my phone and continue as soon as I am back on the stable base from before.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPX:

Very good deep sleep ratio and battery life in night use.

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,68% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%

Maybe the right decision to come back to XWLPX ROM.
[Galaxy S II General] j1gga84:
DorimanX Kernel is only good when you tweak it. With standard settings Siyah Kernel is better I think!

Regards
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPX:

Worse battery life in mixed usage.

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,72% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,7%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,54%

Oh, I have installed a new app that generated some wakelocks for connecting to the internet.

Good to check all stats in BBS app.

So I will have to re-do the test again.
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
In the last night good night usage

Worse mixed usage xwlpx simplistic rom, phenomenal kernel, Facebook pinterest, sync, email app exchange, instagram wi fi all time
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks for sharing your experiences.

Similar to mine ... although you are on a different ROM.

I recommend to use BBS app to examine the battery stats.

And keep in mind that your screen filter app is also reducing the brightness of your screenshots :cool:
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
What is a screen filter used for?

NeatROM/Liquid smooth & Siyah = S2 perfection
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Usually a screen filter app is used to reduce the brightness of the display (lower than the lowest brightness from system settings) ... to reduce the battery consumption and enhance the battery life on OLED / AmOLED displays.
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Even lower than 0 brightness! Woah!

NeatROM/Liquid smooth & Siyah = S2 perfection
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPX:

I disabled wifi when in standby on battery (in system menu Settings > Wi-Fi > Advanced > Keep Wi-Fi on during sleep : only when connected/plugged in).

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme (wifi off when screen off): Battery loss of 0,76% per hour, Awake: 5,4%, Deep sleep: 94%

Slightly worse battery life in night use than before with wifi "always" enabled.

So, wifi seems to use a little bit less battery power than mobile data connection (3G) in my area.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Have a look here for a rooted stock kernel for XWLPW => http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=31310851

In post #2 you will find XWLPW-DBT ICS 4.0.4 as a signed zip file - can be flashed in stock recovery.

Good luck !
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPX:

Better battery life in mixed usage with wifi in standby disabled when on battery.

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme (wifi off when screen off): Battery loss of 1,53% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15%, Deep sleep: 85%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,38%

Ok, now I want to verify that its battery life is really significantly higher when wifi is always on ... next run.