yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II General] mathmachado:
Re: [22 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

IMO too, lol

I wasnt with my screen on all the time, but most of it I was on calls or multitasking, so 3% is very good
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I would recommend NeatROM Lite (= removed bloatware and some nice extra features) ... version ... well ... I had best battery life on XWLS8, but now I'm on XWLSD ... and still happy.

It's your choice.

First try with stock/PhilZ kernel. Then you may flash another kernel, if you feel the need for it.

Good luck !
[Galaxy S II General] -iNCEPTiON-:
Wrong question, try it urself and see :P
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
i freeze google maps and l2 hsic wakelock is done, big deep sleep im my Neatrom 4.4 xwms1 i'm using hirox kernel 5.1

i try million configs in maps , nothing worked and then I froze it and boom the problems are gone!

I dont understand this
[Galaxy S II General] mathmachado:
Re: [22 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Is google now enabled?
[Galaxy S II General] Dexter_prog:
hey lt_er, remember me from the BetterBatteryStats thread? We discussed the wifi battery drain issues. Have you reached any new conclusions? I'm also having god awful screen time. Using the screen for 1 h can make the battery go as fast as 10%/hour, which is insane. If I use screen+gps (as in the game Ingress) I get 25%/hour
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Oh ... that's really bad. Don't play Ingress ;)

As wifi is still consuming much battery, I'll prefer wifi policy to keep wifi running only when phone is plugged into charger.
[Galaxy S II General] Achraf AOUAD:
Kernel-V7.48 is out !!

i just have to finish my siyah b5 second test and then i willl give it try and see whats new
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [22 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

1hr screen on only makes battery go 10%/hr:eek:

Well that would equal 10hrs screen on:confused:

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Jeboo v2.1:

Bad battery life in night use.

Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,73% per hour, Awake: 2,4%

Maybe it was a bad night for the kernel and/or my phone ... will do re-test to confirm the result.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] bogdan1980:
Re: [23 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Jeboo 2.1 is bad on battery.

Galaxy powered by GM and Dorimanx.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Jeboo v2.1:

Bad battery life in mixed usage too.

Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,60% per hour, Wifi: 15,2%, Awake: 12,1%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,44%

I will re-do the battery test, just to verify my results.

Seems that my phone does not like this Jeboo version.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] lionsmatara:
Re: [23 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Bro lt_ler,

Any test about dorimanx v7.48?? :rolleyes::rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II General] dorie365:
Re: [23 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Hirox extreme. Most stable kernel I have tested.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re: [23 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Not yet. But I have already downloaded it.

It's on my kernels-to-test list.
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
which this program is that measuring cpu and ram in your screnshot?
[Galaxy S II General] dandu:
Re: [23 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

It's "Cool tool"

Odesláno z mého GT-I9100 pomocí Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] dorie365:
Re: [23 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Yeah cool tool. I can monitor what program does eat a lot of battery when idle or running and if I have found one I'll uninstalling or freeze it.
[Galaxy S II General] PholkLorr:
7.49 is out so dont need to test 7.48.

I myself used 7.48 for a few hrs. It is EXTREMELY unstable. 3 hangs in the span of 4 hrs of it just sitting on my bed doing nothing with default settings.

EDIT: Reflashed back to 7.45 (most stable version for me so far) after using 7.49 for 1 minute. Wifi doesnt work.
[Galaxy S II General] Thisnameisepic:
Re: [23 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

lt_ler when you test dorimanx 7.49 enable force gpu rendering in developer settings. It's recommended by dorimanx himself in order to avoid issues and some say it helps battery too.

Phone: Samsung Galaxy S2 GT-9100

ROM: NeatROM Lite 4.3 LSD

Kernel: Siyah v6 b5

Modem: XXLS8

External: SANDISK 32GB CLASS 10

THE RED BLUR's CAVE OF GUIDES ON FLASHING AND USING LSJ/LS8/LSD ROMS AND KERNELS + BONUS TOOLS

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=35923600

Press thanks if this post helped you :)
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [23 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Only problem with testing Dorimanx, by the time you finish the test two more versions get released making the one you tested a waste of time:banghead::D

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-test Jeboo v2.1:

Way better battery life on second battery cycle in night use.

Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 1,3%

Excellent deep sleep ratio.

Maybe the battery stats chip was not settled down correctly on first run.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] jackbauer2411:
This sounds better :D I'm using Jeboo v2.1 for a few days now and the bad results in your tests were surprising as for me it is very battery friendly :)
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, sometimes I have to re-do the battery tests.

Needs some time ... but this way I hope I get better/more reliable and comparable results.
[Galaxy S II General] ciyrus:
Siyah

The last Siyah ist very best on Omega V20

cpu:pegasusq

cpumax:1400
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-test Jeboo v2.1:

Also better battery life in mixed usage on second run.

Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 18,6%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%

It's ok, but not the best I had on XWLSD on my phone.

Here are some screenhsots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ-touch v4.64:

I flashed PhilZ-touch kernel v4.64 (signed / not the fixed version) on my XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3.

It is very stable and smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine (GPS, wifi, bluetooth, camera, video recording, gallery, video layer, live thumbnails, custom boot animation, etc.).

Excellent battery life in night use.

PhilZ-touch v4.64 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,48% per hour, Awake: 1,3%

It's nearly the same as my best result so far (for XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2 on stock/PhilZ kernel too) ... with nearly the same fantastic deep sleep ratio.

If its battery life in mixed usage is also that good, I have to think about staying a while on this kernel.

My phone seems to like this kernel ... fits very good to my personal usage/needs so far.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] oskarpp3:
Hello It`ler,

great to hear about last Philz - Kernel. Will give it a try soon.

But the new speedmod is released

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2140192&page=24

Maybe you can give it a try also.

And thanks for your hard work.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, already downloaded the latest SpeedMod kernel.

It's based on the latest JB sources ... so it will have the Exynos exploit patched :fingers-crossed:

Maybe some more advantages compared to the stock kernel ... I am curious now.
[Galaxy S II General] Thisnameisepic:
lt_ler, I got similar results! Philz is the best for battery life without any tweaks imo. Here is my first cycle on it

Phone: Samsung Galaxy S2 GT-9100

ROM: NeatROM Lite 4.3 LSD or AllianceROM v7.01 LSD

Kernel: Siyah v6 b5

Modem: XXLS8

External: SANDISK 32GB CLASS 10

THE RED BLUR's CAVE OF GUIDES ON FLASHING AND USING LSJ/LS8/LSD ROMS AND KERNELS + BONUS TOOLS

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=35923600

NeatROM SUPER Lite(developed by salesale, modified by bobdoblo)

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=38372709&postcount=34296
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [25 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Lol, you're well proud of it aren't you! :D

Thats about the fifth time you posted it today:D:thumbup:

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ-touch v4.64:

Excellent battery life in mixed usage too.

PhilZ-touch v4.64 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,32% per hour, Wifi: 12,6%, Awake: 11,4%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,19%

Best results on XWLSD for my normal usage so far.

Will keep a nandrod backup of this system.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I have similar results like TNIE.

And I am proud of it :D

As long as the results are good, we can enjoy our phones :highfive:

P.S.:

Have you worse results :confused:
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [25 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=38418497

:p

Just flashed Philz MS1 4.53

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
;)

Have already thanked you for the battery stats post.

SiyahKernel on MS1 ... not bad :good:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SpeedMod K5-2:

I just flashed SpeedMod K5-2 kernel on my XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3.

It is very stable and smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine (GPS, wifi, bluetooth, custom boot animation, gallery, video player, camera, video recording, Exynos exploit patch, live thumbnails, etc.).

Ok ... still the "old" CWM recovery and still no full support for TriangleAway app ... but these are minor things IMO.

Now preparing the battery tests.
[Galaxy S II General] Thisnameisepic:
Re: [25 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

I honestly had a bad time trying to get this post here. 4 fails in a row but I did it :D

Phone: Samsung Galaxy S2 GT-9100

ROM: NeatROM Lite 4.3 LSD or AllianceROM v7.01 LSD

Kernel: Siyah v6 b5

Modem: XXLS8

External: SANDISK 32GB CLASS 10

THE RED BLUR's CAVE OF GUIDES ON FLASHING AND USING LSJ/LS8/LSD ROMS AND KERNELS + BONUS TOOLS

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=35923600

NeatROM SUPER Lite(developed by salesale, modified by bobdoblo)

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=38372709&postcount=34296
[Galaxy S II General] lionsmatara:
Re: [25 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Dorimanx 7.49 :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::(
[Galaxy S II General] jackbauer2411:
Hey,

why did u choose the signed and not the bootloop fixed version? Is there any other important difference besides the fix of the bootloop bug affecting the kernel's performance / battery life?

Your results for 4.64 look great, but for me it would be too unsecure to flash the non-fixed version.. :)
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [25 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

+1;)

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, I know ... but I am not confident enough to flash it now ... maybe tomorrow :o
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
The main reason for flashing the signed and not the fixed version is ... I have never experienced the boot loop issue so far on my phone.

In the fixed version, there is only one small (init) part reverted to the older XXLSJ version.

So maybe it has no to little effect to performance and battery life ... and everyone who already experienced the boot loop issue should use the fixed version only.

I hope (just like Phil) that Samsung will release a boot loop free stock ROM ... soon.

P.S.:

Glad that you got your SkipSongFix mod from salesale in NeatROM thread :good:
[Galaxy S II General] a0007:
wait to next release

This version not stable
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SpeedMod K5-2:

Bad battery life in night use.

SpeedMod K5-2 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 3,5%

Bad deep sleep ratio ... more than 2 hours wifi running although the screen was off all the time ... some google (quick) search wakelocks/alarms (first time on XWLSD) ... something is strange.

Have to abort the battery test.

Could be an individual issue on my phone ... maybe the phone "thought" that it was still plugged in ... but I have unplugged it while turned off, then booted normally and started the recording for battery test in night use.

If I think I can solve this issue, I have to re-do the test.

EDIT:

Added a screenshot:
[Galaxy S II General] kadivarz:
hmm

Ye Retest but using M1 rom for me M1 Neat 4.4+speedmod 5.2 works nice a good battery even on wi fi use and no Fc at all even the crt effect works fine :)

Nice work man Keep up the good work your post is always opened in my browser :D
[Galaxy S II General] wilmer mclean:
Great thread, its very useful. Out of interest what is the best you had on XWLSD? Have searched through the thread and cant seem to find it.
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [26 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Its in OP but the answer is Philz 4.64

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Correct :good:

Till now, I had best battery life with stock / PhilZ kernel on XWLSD.

Maybe it's because of my hardware, my apps, my settings, my usage ... or it's just because stock kernel is very good.
[Galaxy S II General] wilmer mclean:
Thanks both of you for the help. On the latest Siyah at the moment. Is there any difference between Philz and stock kernel or is philz a custom version of the stock kernel if that makes any sense? Also have you got better results with Neat Rom compared to the stock rom?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Basically, PhliZ is stock kernel with an extended and patched CWM recovery.

Performance and battery life wise, there should be no significant difference IMO.
[Galaxy S II General] lionsmatara:
Re: [26 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Dorimanx 8.00 out too... :rolleyes::rolleyes::(:confused:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
That was fast.

Just downloaded the V1 (v7.50) and V2 (v8.00) version.

Maybe time to check new Mali drivers.
[Galaxy S II General] a0007:
Re: [26 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Hi bro

Don't pass this release of heroX extreme .. really is very good

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=38515000
[Galaxy S II General] Thisnameisepic:
Re: [26 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

lt_ler, I know you had a bad experience with hirox previous version.

But before the 5.3 version in the quoted post, a 5.3 stock cpu and gpu voltages version was released, based on latest speed mod. Take a look here. http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=38503753 I believe you should try it. Thanks :) :beer:

Phone: Samsung Galaxy S2 GT-9100

ROM: NeatROM Lite 4.3 LSD or AllianceROM v7.01 LSD

Kernel: Siyah v6 b5

Modem: XXLS8

External: SANDISK 32GB CLASS 10

THE RED BLUR's CAVE OF GUIDES ON FLASHING AND USING LSJ/LS8/LSD ROMS AND KERNELS + BONUS TOOLS

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=35923600

NeatROM SUPER Lite(developed by salesale, modified by bobdoblo)

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=38372709&postcount=34296
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [26 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Don't know about battery yet but Speedmod K5-3 is much better than it was a few versions ago when i last tested it.

Very smooth and fast, (10320 in Antutu:p:D I like a high score)

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I downloaded both versions - the pure SpeedMod based and the extremely undervolted version.

When I am confident enough, I will test HiroX 5.3 Extreme ... although I expect that my phone is not able to boot it.

Now I want to finish my current tests for SpeedMod ... first K5-2 then K5-3 to check, if the reverted init executable has any influence to the battery life.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SpeedMod K5-2:

Better battery life in night use on second run.

SpeedMod K5-2 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,67% per hour, Awake: 2,5%

But it's still worse than on stock / PhilZ kernel.

Checking its battery life on mixed usage now.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [27 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Is Speedmod undervolted by default It_ler?

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] parag1dubey:
Re: [27 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

No bob.. That is hirox kernel, i believe.. But i might be wrong.. Lt ler, so philz is the best for battery life and performance, right?
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [27 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Thanks and yes Philz is currently the best;)

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] lionsmatara:
Re: [27 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Bro u abandon dorimanx??? :banghead:
[Galaxy S II General] AllSeeyinEye:
Well, bro...

You act as if this is It_lers payed job, and you are his employer....

As you could have read, there's several kernels waiting to be tested. They are on the to do list. And besides, the last stable release for Dorimanx was tested long ago. The current releases are all beta versions. No need in testing those, but that's my opinion.

What's wrong with testing a kernel yourself? It's not as if they all behave equal on different phones and setups...
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
hey friends. My results for NeatROM XWLSD with Phiilz 4.64-fixed kernel. the one thing i notice in all my tests till date is that i manage almost similar times. :). Maybe being a consistent 3G user i cannot better than this :(. sometimes i feel the latest modems are not working out great for Airtel in my city Nagpur. i have posted certain screenshots of my settings and followed the complete lite list by Bob.
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [27 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Thats good Hilmesh:thumbup:

I use wi-fi mainly and uses less battery so thats why i get more screen on probably but over 3 hours with that amount of standby on stock battery is good:)

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] lionsmatara:
Re: [27 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Bro thanks for share... :D

What is ur settings for good battery life?:confused:
[Galaxy S II General] kadivarz:
bro i use wifi too and am using LSD neat .with the phillz i get poor Battery life but i didnt try the siyah

wat u think is the best kernel for wifi use and this rom build ??
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [27 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Look at Speedmod so far:eek: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=38546262

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SpeedMod K5-2:

Moderate battery life in mixed usage.

SpeedMod K5-2 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,54% per hour, Wifi: 15,8%, Awake: 12,6%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,38%

It's slightly better than for previous kernel version, but still worse than for stock / PhilZ kernel.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
Re: [27 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Hello brother, some settings that I used are there in the screen shots. In the power saving mode I did not turn on cpu power saving as that under clocks our cpu to 800mhz. Also I removed all apps as mentioned by bob. The only thing I left was flashbar service as I use multi window sometimes. Always on low brightness and on auto while outdoors. All startups adjusted using autostart app. That's it. Hope it helps.

---------- Post added at 07:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:30 PM ----------

Hello brother, sorry I cannot answer as every kernel behaves differently. My suggestion will be try each one and see which gives you the best results in comparison. After that fine tune it. Cheers
[Galaxy S II General] kadivarz:
THx man but one more question how long should i give a chance for each kernel to test it ?

or if the kernel is good it will give results at the 1st day use??

Thx in advance
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [27 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Speedmod K5-3 test http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=38558216:thumbup:

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Good results :good:

My battery test for SpeedMod K5-3 has just started.

Let's see if I can get similar results on my phone.
[Galaxy S II General] lionsmatara:
Re: [27 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [27 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Coma http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=38576753:D

@ lionsmatara My guide is in my signature.

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
Bob, why do the removed apps keep coming back??? i have done a complete fresh install of XWLSD now and just flashed the MW fix for JB reloaded and now all my uninstalled apps are back. shouldi follow Sun's advise of converting them all to user apps and uninstall??? they keep coming back because they are in preload folder right???
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [27 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Delete from preload folder or try Sun90 advice.

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
how did u delete from preload folder???
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [27 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Need ESfile manager (set root permissions in settings) or Root Explorer.

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Just as addition:

Here are bob's removed apps.

And here is a description of disabling autostarts for apps, such as Maps.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SpeedMod K5-3:

Very good battery life in night use.

SpeedMod K5-3 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 1,8%

Although I had a big SyncLoopWakeLock, I had that good battery life in night use with a very good deep sleep ratio.

Let's check its battery life in mixed usage ... hopefully I can find the culprit for the wakelock. (I suspect Google Reader, as I tried to "greenify" it.)

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [28 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

We always get the same results/conclusion:thumbup:

You not do benchmarks no more It_ler because SpeedMod getting good results there too!

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Maybe I will re-start doing some benchmarks again ... I'm just collecting some motivation ... got one for your post now.

But I don't want to use "all" benchmarks. AnTuTu seems to make a good job.

I'll have to think about it, before taking a decision.
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [28 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

I only go by Antutu as quadrant etc gives much different scores everytime, Antutu scores are always roughly the same.

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] bogdan1980:
Re: [28 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

A new benchmark appear, epic citadel, based on unreal engine. I got 40fps at 1.4cpu, 400mhz gpu.

Antutu is becoming like quadrant, not quite relevant.

The only ones i trust is basemark es, nenamark 2, epic citadel, cf bench.

Galaxy powered by GM@Dorimanx.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Oh ... is there someone applying as volunteer for doing future kernel benchmark tests?

Thanks for naming your favorite benchmark apps :good:
[Galaxy S II General] Achraf AOUAD:
Re: [28 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

I can do that

Benchmarking all the kernels

But im still on Omega18 witch is based on LSJ the reason why is because lsj is bootloop free and im quite happy with it

If different rom than urs is not a problem im glad to help u with benchmarking every jb sammy kernel :)

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9100 avec Tapatalk