yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, it is ... at least on my phone with my apps, settings and my normal (= light) usage, as it is still smooth and has best battery life.

Will keep it for the weekend and wait for the next kernel version ... or test Jeboo kernel v1.1d inbetween :confused:

I don't know ...
[Galaxy S II General] NoRulesForMe:
what settings did you do mate? ... please teach me again :angel:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
As listed in FAQs of post #2, here my basic ROM settings => http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=36229516&postcount=1359

And for DorimanX kernel I am running on completely default settings.

What do you want to know?
[Galaxy S II General] Farooq95:
Dude jeboo 1.1d is damn smooth and its giving me more juice than ever I will post battery results......
[Galaxy S II General] -iNCEPTiON-:
I think ur setting is really awesome .. as I told u that I m trying ur setting .. and this is wat I got .. I will stick to this setting now ;) thanx alot...

http://db.tt/CIJKQuMu

http://db.tt/D6rGSDiA

http://db.tt/bB6b5AyR

http://db.tt/l8u0zDXq
[Galaxy S II General] Farooq95:
Jeboo 1.1d till now no fc reboots at all here the battery till now....
[Galaxy S II General] Farooq95:
Jeboo 1.1d
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
I am glad it helped mate. :)

I am now doing a stock test on siyah with No UC/OC/UV. No stock power saving. Will post result after complete cycle. Cheers :)
[Galaxy S II General] bombaybadboy:
I got a fair deep sleep with jeboo 1.1d last night, for as long as I slept. No reboots so far
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Told you you could do it BBB;)

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] bombaybadboy:
1 hour screen on with 1650 battery
[Galaxy S II General] -iNCEPTiON-:
Waiting for it .. :)
[Galaxy S II General] Farooq95:
Well I have been posting about battery a while ago and after watching a movie for 2hrs,listening to to music and surfing on 2g since I don't have wifi at home ...I'm on jeboo 1.1d...and the battery is amazing and everything is so smooth and perfect better than stock ICS I'm on NRLite by salesale

This is also my first cycle and I will post again when my battery runs out of juice.
[Galaxy S II General] -iNCEPTiON-:
Nice ;) , i just wanted to ask , how to attach pics from xda premium app ?? i can only attach one pic and when i attach the second one , the first one gets deleted... :(
[Galaxy S II General] AllSeeyinEye:
Use Tapatalk

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
When I am on xda app, I upload the images to dropbox (or alternative cloud/internet space) and insert a link into the post.

Maybe in xda premium app, there is another way :confused:
[Galaxy S II General] -iNCEPTiON-:
Tapatalk is not good .. its gives too much wakelocks :(
[Galaxy S II General] AllSeeyinEye:
Haven't got a single wakelock from Tapatalk... Just don't use the notifications.

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] -iNCEPTiON-:
hmm , i guess i will give it a try.. first let me see what bombaybadboy says!
[Galaxy S II General] bombaybadboy:
Sorry but I just post one then a second, I have never had any problems with xda premium app. You could cut and paste your screen shots together :) are you using latest xda app I think its 2.0.1
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
For me, on my phone with my settings/apps, in my region for my normal use, stock XWLPD (on CF-Root kernel for XXLPD) and Phenomenal 5.3 / 5.5 Extreme had best battery life.

Could be the same for you, on your phone in your region, could be different.

Just check it yourself and report back.

Good luck !
[Galaxy S II General] AndroidGX:
I decided to be back to Phenomenal 5.5 with the Medium edition, as Extreme is finally not nicely supported on my device even with tegrak UV adjustments for CPU+GPU :( (some random freezes still).

I think it has a better battery life for

day using

for my device than XWLPD cf-root.

Btw, since I migrated to this XXLPW modem, I really see a huge difference when I'am out of my home wifi. I now qualify it same as XXKI4 of GB, clearly :cool:

I hope hardcore won't stop his kernel to K3-20 for ICS, since it's now 20 days without any update :(
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
XXLPW modem had a slightly better battery life on my phone than XXLPX modem too.

And I would also like to test a new version of SpeedMod ... as this kernel was my first custom kernel and always a good choice for a very good "out-of-the-box" kernel.

But there are some Siyah-based kernels which seem to be very good ... after all bugs and issues are eliminated.
[Galaxy S II General] chispero:
Add Kernel Apolo

Hi, Could you add the kernel Apolo in the benchmark and battery stats?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Second user suggesting this kernel.

As I said before, I will consider it, but I prefer kernels with a kernel thread here in XDA.

P.S.:

And I like descriptions that I can read/understand => English language would be nice.
[Galaxy S II General] AndroidGX:
I have a preference for XDA kernels too, if I traducted well in my language from spanish, this kernel looks promising, it's a "Phenomenal" like but with SIO & VR I/O and pegasusq GOV which seems to be a real winner. I will seriously take a look at this soon :cool:

I'am bored with Phenomenal 5.5 Medium edition right now, need some changes :D

*edit* : just flashed Apollo V0 (looks like the Extreme edition of Phenomenal), I will report in few days.
[Galaxy S II General] dj_m:
NICE

you just answered a doubt about a kernel i was using
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Which kernel?

And which question?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Dorimanx 3.6:

Feels not as smooth as other kernels on my phone ... like somebody holding the brake all time.

It has a very good deep sleep in night use, but very high battery consumption.

No idea what might cause this battery drain while doing nothing?!

I wiped caches and used the same calibration method like everytime => http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1312273

Very curious ...

EDIT:

Tests for Dorimanx 3.6 finished.

Now I really have to charge my battery ;-)

Maybe I restore my last nandroid backup of XWLPD and flash Phenomenal 5.5 Extreme again.

There must be a kernel which has better battery life on my phone than stock XWLPD kernel ... I only have to find it.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Changed my mind and running CF-Root v5.5 for XXLPD again, but with some changes in system and app settings.

Just want to play a little bit => try out some changes and want to check, what impact these changes really have on my battery life.
[Galaxy S II General] AndroidGX:
You really should take a look at this Apollo kernel (direct link with well traducted to english by Google).

Want your advice on it when you will have time.

The kernel and the idea itself of combining a phenomenal kernel and adding it some I/O and governors should be a winner but since yesterday night that I'am trying it, I'am a bit disappointed about deep sleep overnight and definitively more with my day usage, where it should not :(

For exemple I did 8 minutes web browsing via Dolphin : lost 11%, did a little sleep of an hour after on my bed and lost 4% more right after when waking up the phone. Totally disappointed.

For some informations on my settings : I set I/O to "sio" and tried "pegasusq" governor.

Many thanks for your time :)
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks for sharing your experiences.

As I was a little bit disappointed by the last few kernels I have tested concerning battery life, I want to "settle down" my phone, the phone's battery and myself ;-)

That's why I came back to stock XWLPD ... and now changing some settings to check their impact for battery life.

If it could be interesting for your Battery Saving TIPS Collection (your tm ?!), I will post it in your thread.
[Galaxy S II General] AndroidGX:
Nothing hurry, and it's totally understandable, take both a nice and well desserved rest :cool:

What kind of settings are you trying ? whatever it is, hope you will see a difference.

Sorry mate didn't understood, what do you mean about "tm" ?

Many thanks! :cool:
[Galaxy S II General] dj_m:
about dorimanx kernel

bad battery life and occasional freezing
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
We are not alone ... !

But Dorimanx said that he will try to fix all bugs and issues.

Let's see.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Oh, you wrote it into your thread's title:

tm = trademark ... I think that is what you meant by "tm" :p

Just kidding ... I will let you know about my changed settings if I can recognize any significant difference for battery life.
[Galaxy S II General] AndroidGX:
Ahhhhh ok !! :D trademark of course, sorry didn't understood :D

Sounded logical, but I'am sure you beat my english in vocabulary :p didn't recognized "tm" directly ;)

Putted this for fun yeah ^^ I like stylish thread subjects :o

'laters!
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Change no. 1:

I compared my current XWLPD system in battery tests with no auto sync for accounts and auto sync for one (Google) account (only Contacts and Calender).

No difference in night use, and in mixed usage, I recognized a difference of about 11 hours (for 100% stock battery) => about 15% less battery life for auto sync enabled.

And that is only for one account with only Calender and Contacts enabled.

Just wanted to check how big the difference of this setting is.
[Galaxy S II General] AndroidGX:
Yeah that's exactly what I wanted to try few days ago for my new setting : deleting Gmail app and replacing it by E-Mail app and put an automatic sync every X hours and keeping only contacts/calendar auto sync, to save a bit more battery ;)

I heard some people using "push" gmail situation, but I don't know what is it exactly. Seems a good way to save battery also :cool:

Thanks for sharing your sync test, it's interesting :)
[Galaxy S II General] WhoIsJohnGalt1979:
I have been using Phenomenal 5.5 Medium (was chicken to try Extreme) following your suggestion, am very happy using it, no hanky panky kernel, smooth, no lags while playing games (NFS, Temple Run etc) or 720p video. Very decent battery performance. Thank you:)
[Galaxy S II General] Farooq95:
Here you go battery result for jeboo 1.1d....

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=36654516
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v7.38:

Just a short "wifi on and running" battery test for this kernel.

To get more "traffic" I also started Skype app - so Skype was running all the time too.

Battery loss: 8% (100% to 92%) => 3,97%/h

Time on battery: 2 h 1 m

Wifi On: 2 h 1 m Ratio: 100.0%

Wifi Running: 2 h 1 m Ratio: 100.0%

Deep Sleep: 1 h 14 m 34 s Ratio: 61.4%

Awake: 46 m 23 s Ratio: 38.3%

Screen On: 23 m 04 s Ratio: 19.1%

A little bit worse than on Jeboo v1.1c but slightly better than on SiyahKernel v6.0b4.

And with a higher screen on ratio.

Not bad.
[Galaxy S II General] Kai Disobey:
@ It_ler

One little Question about your Dorimanx-Settings !!!!

Have you turn your Wlan always on in Android-Setting and in Stweaks-Settings turn off after 30.sec ???
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
For my wifi short test, I disabled any changing of wifi behaviour in STweaks and set wifi advanced settings to keep wifi running when phone is sleeping to "Always".

For my night use and mixed usage battery tests, I set wifi advanced settings to keep wifi running when phone is sleeping to "When plugged into charger" (no changes in STweaks app).

And only for my last mixed usage battery test, I changed the STweaks settings on CORTEXBRAIN tab to enable "force wifi off" and time was on default "30 sec." AFAIK.

But after my last mixed usage battery test, I disable "force wifi off" again in STweaks, as I noticed that the phone was disconnected from WLAN while screen was on and doesn't reconnect automatically. (I had to disable wifi toggle and enable it again to manually get reconnected to my WLAN.)

Maybe the "force wifi off" is sometimes to "strict" and messes up the ROMs wifi connection handling :confused:

Anyway, latest DorimanX has got a very good battery life in mixed usage on my phone, even without the "force wifi off" option enabled in STweaks.
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
It_ler thats the conclusion i came to.

Siyah is great with screen off but battery drops fast in use.

Jeboo is slightly worse screen off but better screen on which on my phone matters more because i am a heavy user.

Just about to flash voku's Dorimanx 7.37 test kernel.

Guys can you keep the screen shots to a full cycle please not at 80, 50, 25 percent etc please.

Unless you have something extremely good/out of the ordinary.:):thumbup:

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Jeboo v1.1d:

I just flashed Jeboo kernel v1.1d on my XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0 ROM.

It is stable and very smooth on my phone.

Everything seems to work fine so far (Exynos exploit patch, wifi, bluetooth, gallery, video player, camera, GPS, etc.).

Running some benchmarks ... will add the results to first post in a few minutes.

EDIT:

Benchmark results added to first post.

Nearly the same results as for prevoius kernel versions.
[Galaxy S II General] connectandroid:
It_ler, from your experience does battery life improve a bit after a few full charge and discharge cycles after each rom flash ??
[Galaxy S II General] NoRulesForMe:
why not the latest? 7.38?
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Heard voku test build of 7.37 was better but video player didn't work so i changed to jeboo 1d as i promised Sir Greg i would try it because he says it is great:)

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] bombaybadboy:
Ok full cycle on jeboo 1.1d for me on 1650, did have to add 1% because I over did it and killed battery so couldnt take ss :)

This is 1.1d not 1.0d so there is no mistake
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Very good BBB:thumbup:

Btw its 1d i'm on not 1.1d.

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Sometimes yes, sometimes no.

I often re-test the same kernel/ROM combination to verify my results and check that my system is still stable.

Most of the time, I get nearly the same battery life. And if you get slightly different results, this can be called "noise", as there are so many influences for your battery life.

If the battery stats chip was not settled down enough, the battery power level is not shown correctly. And the battery consumption is not reliable.

So the battery test on the second or third battery cycle may have more realistic and reproduceable results.

As I already said, sometimes it's better, and sometimes it's worse than on the first run.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
To avoid misunderstandings and mistakes with these version numbers, you may say Jeboo v1.0d (instead of 1d) ... ;)
[Galaxy S II General] -iNCEPTiON-:
I am using 2.2.0 :s i think i need to switch to tapatalk :(
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Jeboo v1.1d:

Very good battery life in night use.

Jeboo v1.1d (XXLSJ): Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 1,9%

It has an excellent deep sleep ratio on my phone.

Now let's check its battery life in mixed usage.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] Achraf AOUAD:
My battery life with a light use

With omega v18 + siyah v6.0b4

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9100 avec Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
1.1c or d It_ler?

Have you had no issues of random rebooting on 1.1d?

I wanted to try it but that kept me from trying.

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
It's v1.1d and I have no reboot issues so far :good:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Jeboo v1.1d:

Nearly the same battery life in mixed usage than v1.1a.

Jeboo v1.1d (XXLSJ): Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 24,3%, Awake: 12,1%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%

It's Ok, but I had expected little bit better results.

Maybe I verify my results on a second battery cycle.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Thats good It_ler:thumbup:

I knew it was 1.1d btw, i was saying should i go for 1.1c or d!? :p:D;)

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I know that you know what Jeboo Kernel version I am using. But I didn't understand your "hidden" message :screwy:

As I have no issues at all on Jeboo v1.1d, I can recommend to test this version.

If you got random reboots, you can flash another kernel.
[Galaxy S II General] Kai Disobey:
Dorimanx 7.39 is out now !!!

Kernel 7.39 All included

Change Log:

*With GM help fixed the Volume Boost in STweaks for JB SAMMY ROMS.

*Nightmare GOV fixed and tuned by Alucard24 now works much better.

*ZenX GOV fixed and working, but need more testing.

*Added tuning for JB SAMMY ROM to use AFTR only to fix sound on screen off.

*Added new TAB in STweaks for I/O tuning. + rearrange by Alucard24.

*Fix for RAM leak by VOKU! works great and now allot free RAM always.

*Restored Control of TouchScreen CPU freq Boost, it's was 500Mhz and now user can control it.

*Me And Voku made more Code Sync with latest RAM code from 3.8.RC3 Kernel!

*Kernel patched with 3.0.58 Main stream by Voku.

*MMC code updated by Voku.

*Voku added LOW MEM debug in kernel LOG + Check if new kernel uploaded to FTP servers

Known BUGS:

*WIFI hot Spot not working for JB SAMMY and CM10.1

we need to work on it.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Sounds good.

Is already on my kernels-to-test list ... and downloaded :cool:

Will finish my re-test of Jeboo kernel v1.1d first.
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
Hello It_ler / Bob / Mr. Killer,

I am back with results from my battery cycle. Screenshots attached.

Modem used is BVLP7

Kernel - Siyah 6.0b4 :::: There is no UV/OC/UC involved. No Power saving Mode. Have not touched Stweaks at all. Used voltage control app to set scheduler to ROW while starting the Test. Governor is Siyah default Pegasusq

Of the total Screen on time (3H 46M) half was on ROW and the other half on SIO. This happened as my 2 yr old Son restarted the phone mid way :) and I realised late.

Of the total screen On time, for about 1H 30M the phone was used for viewing video songs by my Son.

The rest of the complete screen on time I was on 3G. About 32M of Voice Calls.

Display was set to stock minimum brightness. Standard freezes using TB and disabled Autostarts as before.

Edit - Forgot to mention

Have IM+Pro running the background with 4 accounts in Push mode

Whatsapp in background

Use gmail to check email from 3 accounts - Manual Refresh only

XDA app for reading the missed posts ;)

Accuweather widget refreshed manually as and when connected to 3G.

did not kill any apps for the complete cycle using gemini or stock.
[Galaxy S II General] -iNCEPTiON-:
Awesome .. That is the only reason I love Siyah Kernel :) No Matter UV or Not , you will get awesome battery life ;)

I am loving my S2 again now :D LOL

Thanks for sharing your results :)
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Fantastic Hilmesh:thumbup:;)

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
hello all,

while flashing any new kernel is it necessary to fix permissions???
[Galaxy S II General] mr_zuff:
No,it's not necessary:) but you can fix perm to avoid any problems with apps fc's :)

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I don't fix permissions in CWM recovery.

Only if you experience issues which can be related to file (system) accesses, you can fix permissions in recovery to try to solve these issues.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Update Jeboo v1.1d:

Nearly the same battery life on second cycle in night use.

Jeboo v1.1d (XXLSJ): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 1,8%

My system is stable :fingers-crossed:

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Update Jeboo v1.1d:

Slightly better battery life on second battery cycle in mixed usage.

Jeboo v1.1d (XXLSJ): Battery loss of 1,48% per hour, Wifi: 14,8%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,33%

Now I will prepare flashing a new kernel ... maybe DorimanX v7.39 ?!

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Dorimanx 7.39

Fast, stable, smooth.:thumbup:

Video player FC.:thumbdown:

HYPER + row

Had aeroplane mode on during night but wi-fi also, only lost 3% in 9 hours! (did it because thats how i tested last jeboo & siyah)

Over 5 hours screen on and nearly 17.5 overall is not bad considering i've been downloading & uploading youtube vids and files, browsing internet & xda.

Compares well, i'd say at the minute, *for my phone and useage* its a bit better than siyah but a bit worse than jeboo 1.1c so not bad for a work in progress.:thumbup:

Roll on 7.40;)
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v7.39:

I just flashed DorimanX kernel v7.39 on my XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0.

It is stable and smooth on my phone.

Everything I need works fine so far (Exynos exploit patch, wifi, bletooth, gallery, LiveThumbnail video player, camera, video recording, GPS, etc.).

Haven't tested wifi tethering as I don't use it anyway.

Running battery tests now, as there seems to be no important change for performance AFAIK.

EDIT:

LiveThumbnail Video Player works without FCs, but the Thumbnails are black ... for my own recorded videos.

For some other videos, it is really a live thumbnail.

As this was the same on Jeboo kernel 1.1d before, I did not report it.

Wiping cache and Dalvik cache, and rescan media could not bring thumbnails for my own recorded videos back.
[Galaxy S II General] Achraf AOUAD:
V7.40 is up and running .....

its working great on my omega v18 performance is topnotch no lag or anything yet.

I have to check the battery life ... since this is my 1st dori test one lsj, i have been using siyah but i have heard that dorimanx is a bit better :good: so why not i give a try :laugh:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks for the info.

Already downloaded, but will finish my running test before flashing the new version.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v7.39:

Very good battery life in night use.

Dorimanx v7.39 (XXLSJ): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 1,6%

It's nearly as good as for SiyahKernel v6.0b4, but has best deep sleep ratio on my phone.

That's great :good:

Now I am curious about its battery life in mixed usage.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] NoRulesForMe:
Thanks for all the test mates :) your test is a big help...

@suggestion mate if you don't mind i hope? >_<

Please do like bob did in his result conclusion...

compare with jeboo also not only siyah? and tell if it get worst on siyah and better on jeboo and what so ever... hope you don't mind mate for easy to understand :o

THanks mate :) :highfive:
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
It_ler does it far better than me mate, check OP http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=26775950

He has listed them all in order of best to worst in night/sleep use and mixed use which is updated after every test:thumbup:

His tests are also more accurate and controlled than mine,

Its where i and lots of other experienced users come to check how kernels perform as It_ler is the best at what he does;):thumbup:

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v7.39:

Good battery life in mixed usage.

Dorimanx v7.39 (XXLSJ): Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%

But it is a little bit worse than for prevoius kernel version.

No second chance, as I will flash and test latest kernel version > v7.40.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Thats seems extremely good, 20+ hours, 2 hours screen and 70% left:eek:

*NeatROM* Its Neat, and its a ROM!
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
On very light usage ... Yes. It's quite good :D
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v7.40:

I just flashed DorimanX kernel v7.40 on my XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0.

It is stable and very smooth on my phone.

Everything I need works fine so far (camera, gallery, LiveThumbNail video player, video recording, GPS, wifi, bluetooth, etc.).

Haven't tested wifi tethering, as I don't use it anyway.

LiveThunmbNails in video player still black ... but this was already before flashing DorimanX kernel.

Many, many settings in STweaks ... that's DorimanX.

I am still on completely default settings.

Let's check its battery life now.
[Galaxy S II General] Achraf AOUAD:
can u plzz help me

the thing is now im on siyah the screen is great with super high contrasty colors and everything...

when i switch to dorimaX the colors are a bit off not like siyah/jeboo..

is there any solution for this matter

thanks in advance