yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
My last Jelly Bean (JB) kernel test results => last JB kernel test results

My last Ice Cream Sandwich (ICE) kernel test results => last ICS kernel test results

My last GingerBread (GB) kernel test results => last GB kernel test results

Current activity:

Testing Apolo v4.14 on XWMS3 NeatROM v6.3 Aroma.

Some FAQs:

Usual procedure for testing:

First, I am searching for a stable, smooth and battery friendly stock ROM.

Then I try to keep as much unchanged as possible (same apps, settings, connections, Modem/Phone/Baseband, CSC, region, time for nightly use, time for mixed usage, screen on time, etc.) in order to get reliable results which can be reproduced.

After flashing a new kernel, I do a normal reboot and if I recognize any issue, I wipe cache partition and Dalvik cache in CWM recovery.

Normally I do not wipe/clear anything for switching kernels, as I do not use any kind of scripts, tweaks, manual UV/UC, etc..

I test all kernel on its completely default settings => kind of "Out-of-the-box".

After booting the kernel and having tested all important functions (internet, wifi, synching accounts, root and busybox (BB) check, scrolling, swiping, browsing, etc.), I reboot the phone again and start the benchmark tests.

Then I shut down the phone and fully charge it to 100%.

Then I unplug the phone, pull out the battery for some minutes, put it back again and turn on the phone.

Usually I wait so a while and start the battery test somewhere in the 95-99% ... as I am flashing in the evening, I start directly with the night usage battery test.

I am using chamonix's BetterBattery Stats (BBS) app to set a custom reference and log all battery stats/wakelocks/alarms/times/etc.

This will take about 8-10 hours, depending on the start and end time ;)

This nightly usage is part of the mixed usage battery test too.

Additionally in the day usage, I try to reproduce the same usage at the same places with nearly the same screen on time of about 2 hours in a time period of about 20 hours.

Sometimes I have to finish the test some minutes earlier or later, sometimes I have a little bit more or less screen on time, but I really try to keep everything which I can influence directly the same.

If I recognize some unusual wakelocks or significant differences from previous kernel versions, I do a second battery test in a second battery cycle.

And once I had to restore the nandroid backup of an older system to come back to my "usual" battery life/consumption and repeat the kernel tests.

But this is the absolute exception.

Normally, I do not have any issues switching ROMs and kernels.
[Galaxy S II General] Intratech:
Brilliant stuff mate. :)
[Galaxy S II General] Rinoko72:
Great work, mate..

5 stars from me, keep it up.! :)

Subcribed ;)
[Galaxy S II General] aceofclubs:
Awesome mate. Finally all your great info in one place.

Much appreciated.

----------------------

GTI9100

Hydra H2O 1.2.1

fluxi xx.01_rc5
[Galaxy S II General] mbutandola:
At last! Love your tests results and now there is a place where I can come and check :). Thank you for that.
[Galaxy S II General] adl:
Great mate!

Congrats to your first "own" thread. :D

Keep the results coming but don´t forget about your real life. ;)
[Galaxy S II General] CamoGeko:
Finally dude, this is what I have been waiting for. :D

Sent from my 80GB CyanogenMOD 9 + Siyah ICS powered beast. Booya!!
[Galaxy S II General] lynx2k50:
Perfect. Thank you very much.

I really would like to see an experiment. Please chose one kernel and tweak it like hell with some configs here @XDA. I really like to see if the twaeking make any sense and how it impact on the battery life.
[Galaxy S II General] bluefa1con:
would be better if you upload the screenies

some people are too lazy to read :p
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
You are right ... images/graphics are much more impressive and can give a quicker overview.

But I do not want to "overload" my posts.

I will think about a "small" visualization.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Good idea ... why don't you do it by yourself?

Best results are "real life" experiences on your own phone, in your region, with your settings/apps/etc.

Feel free to post your results here in this thread.
[Galaxy S II General] sahibunlimited:
You can hide images in spoiler tag

--Any image or text--[ /HIDE]

Just remove the space between [ and /

Ex:

--Any image or text--

Great thread BTW
[Galaxy S II General] kunacs:
A very usefull tread dude, congrats.

If you continue the test, this thread will be no.1 i guess
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Although the first SGS3 are out and many SGS2 users want to "upgrade" their smartphone (heard about 9 million preorders), I am still happy with my SGS2 and will definitely continue searching for the new and best balanced kernel-ROM combination.

Sharing my results is my way to give something back to the XDA community.
[Galaxy S II General] faraaz:
DarkKnight kernel seems to get positive feedback on battery usage (http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1720398). Maybe you can test the kernel? I just flashed the kernel & will see myself if it's better than other kernels...
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Will add this kernel to my "kernel-to-test" list.

Thanks for the suggestion.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Dorimanx 4.0 and 4.0A:

4.0 wasn't smooth on my phone, 4.0A was better.

But on both I had several freezes ... so I had to abort battery tests.

Now back on "my current favorite" XWLPD and waiting for a version which is stable on my phone.
[Galaxy S II General] AndroidGX:
Just flashed yesterday night DarkKnight 1.7, I can confirm it looks promising : since 100% this morning when unplugged : 10 mins screen-on time, 5 minutes browsing news of the web with Dolphin, refreshing my Go twitter widget, check on google play if no apps to update (zero for info :p) and some wake up of device every 10 mins to check mails, which I received one and read + browsed web again for 30 seconds. All this, drained battery to 98%, which is a very nice score, never seen this for a long time!

Currently at 96% with 3 mins phone call, browsing back 3 mins, some wake ups again. Fantastic. :good:

You really should take a look mate when you have time, to this kernel. Highly recommanded for the moment.

I continue my test with my day mixed usage, and a night idle sleep tonight.
[Galaxy S II General] OGroteKoning:
No freezes ger, but I took it off again. 8% battery drain overnight just does not do it for me. After seeing the drain, I looked at your results and it confirmed my result. My settings for this kernel was the same as I normally use for Siyah. But I will definately monitor Dorimanx's progress. This kernel has sooooo much potential!

Sent from my Galaxy S2
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
+1

Same feeling to me.

Dorimanx can close the gap of leaving devs (moving from S2 => S3) ... I hope.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks for sharing your experiences.

Will definitely try DarkKnight kernel, but want to let my phone settle down again after some "stress" with Dorimanx 4.0 versions.
[Galaxy S II General] bgn9000:
Shun Andromeda version 2.0.1 should be stable enough now.

Let me know ;)
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, flashing kernel is already prepared ... just one ree-test for my current base ROM to verify that I am back to "normal" after stress with Dorimanx 4.0.

Keep you updated after flashing your kernel.
[Galaxy S II General] WhoIsJohnGalt1979:
XWLPG with DArkKnight 1.7

Setup - AutoSync(On)+AutoBrightness(On)26%+BacklitLEDs(On)1.5s+Screen Timeout(1 min)+1 Email account(Push)+1 Gmail account+Beautiful Widget(update every 1 hour).

Very smooth, no lags while playing games or watching you tube videos or while scrolling.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks for sharing your results.

Stock battery (1.650 mAh)?
[Galaxy S II General] WhoIsJohnGalt1979:
Yes mate:)
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
so, Phenomenal 5.3 Extreme for good battery life or what is best with your results? thanks.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
ATM my favorite is stock XWLPD ROM with corresponding CF-Root kernel for XXLPD.

But my usage is very light, so with more usage, an extremely undervolted kernel, such as Phenomenal Extreme will have better battery life.

Phenomenal 5.3 Extreme had better battery life, but was not as smooth as Phenomenal 5.5 Extreme on my phone.

It's your choice.
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
thanks a lot! this is good place.. :) i try now Phenomenal 5.3 Extreme and let see what i got.. but sure is this that Phenomenal are best for long battery life?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
That's my experience.

Highly configurable kernels, such as Siyah/N.E.A.K./Dorimanx/etc. may have even better battery life, but you will have to tweak (manually) many different settings.

Out-of-the box (on completely default settings) Phenomenal Extreme had better battery life on my phone.
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
i tried little while ago (2hour) that newest siyah kernel and exTweaks settings..

all tweaks i made with some tutorial.. still i dont get as good deep sleep than Phenomenal... I was wondering a bit that is this true.. dont know..

thats why i want know if someone knows siyah kernel tweaks that bite over this phenomenal :p thanks again! sorry my bad english.. im finnish.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SpeedMod K3-21:

Just a short episode ... I flashed SpeedMod K3-21 as tar version with Mobile Odin (Lite) app.

First boot was OK.

Then I had a freeze after starting Mobile Odin app and had to reboot the phone.

In order to wipe cache partition and Dalvik cache, I booted directly into recovery mode and wiped caches.

Then I could no longer boot my phone normally ... stuck at bootlogo.

Never had this issue on other SpeedMod versions before.

I restored my last nandroid backup and prepare for next kernel flashing.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DarkKnight v1.7:

I like the recovery.

I like the Voltage Control (VC) support.

I don't like the Mobile Odin and TriangleAway issues - evertime I start one of those apps, I get freezes and have to reboot the phone.

I don't like the 1000 MHz as max. freq. - I have bought a Dual-core 1,2 GHz "Power"-smartphone and don't like a kernel to set it by default to something less/lower.

Hope that next versions will work better on my phone.

EDIT:

Had to abbort battery tests, because of freezes and issues with some apps, such as Mobile Odin and Triangle Away.
[Galaxy S II General] h0110:
What about Fluxi http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1644648

It's getting good reports from this thread http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1610044

Any advice for a kernel for heavy users? Testing N.E.A.K with some WIN!UV config but still struggling for battery life on stock battery and the 3500mAh
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
Re: [18 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Hi, now I am on siyah latest. Can you give an idea about your main settings please.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I have already flashed SiyahKernel v6.0b5.

Preparing battery tests right now.

As always, I am running on completely default settings (just enabled the "Discrete Wakelocks stats" option in STweaks to have "clean" numbers in BBS dumps).
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SiyahKernel v6.0b5:

I just flashed SiyahKernel v6.0b5 on my XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3.

It is very stable and smooth on my phone.

Everything seems to work fine so far (wifi, bluetooth, GPS, camera, video recording, gallery, video player, live thumbnails, Exynos exploit patch, custom boot animation, etc.).

No issues detected at all.

Nice to have the TriangleAway support back (current status without rebooting into special mode).

The only thing I still don't like is the CM-related battery charging animation when the phone is turned off - but as long as I am the only one wanting a 100% when fully charged, it is only a very small and my personal issue :crying:

Very good work indeed from gokhanmoral :good:

Preparing the battery tests right now.
[Galaxy S II General] NoRulesForMe:
Re: [18 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

+1 Mr. It_ler

Me too I want that 100% charging :D
[Galaxy S II General] THE RED BLUR:
Re: [18 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

My first proper cycle with Siyah 6.0b5. No tweaks all stock settings with LSD based rom. :)

Also nothing frozen in Samsung apps. As I have all the apps that come with rom plus my own. I have turned off all location services but kept sync on.

Been very stable for me without any issues. And boot loop and boot hang bug completely eliminated from this kernel.

And now stable to boot into rom for the first time with. :)

This is Diffinatley a keeper and will be my go to kernel next to philz LSJ recovery for now. I would have said jeboo 1.3b as my go to over philz but it has that annoying clear delvik function built into kernel when flashing :rolleyes: I much prefer to do my own cleaning with GS2KERNELWIPE.

Cant wait for the updated recovery with preload support and also duel boot.

SIGNATURE

PHONE : SGSII

Sent via: Tapatalk

Main ROM: AllianceROM LSD beta

KERNEL : Siyah 6.0b5

(DEFAULT PROFILE AND SETTINGS )

MODEM : LS8

BATTERY : Stock 1650mAh

EXTERNAL Sdcard : Samsung Class 10 32gb

LAUNCHER : Apex

Root Manager : SuperSU 1.04

THE CAVE = My Guides list to install NeatRom and other ROMS and kernels on LSJ and LS8 + tools to have a bug free rom and kernel + how to back up and RESTORE ROM OM FULLY = http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=35923600

1.Current list of kernels on LSJ and pros and cons

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=36698607

2.Rom Nuke / Wipe scripts

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=36742265

3. GS2KERNELWIPE script

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=36742198

4.Fast Dormancy :

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=36396636

5. How to install full wipe with rom nuke on LSJ

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=36655790
[Galaxy S II General] bogdan1980:
Re: [18 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

My first result with siyah 6.0b5 was 9 hours, 30% bat left, 2,5 hours screen time. xwlsd

I like Jeboo built in clear dalvik.

Galaxy powered by GM and Dorimanx.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SiyahKernel v6.0b5:

Very good battery life in night use.

Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,2%

It's slightly better than for previous kernel version on XWLS8.

Now let's check its battery life in mixed usage.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

:thumbup:

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] NoRulesForMe:
i didn't flash yet sorry can't post my result also on Siyah latest and LSD...

i can't decide yet what to flash or should i say what to try :confused: :eek: :eek: :eek: (LSD or MS1) :eek: :eek: :eek: :confused:
[Galaxy S II General] Farooq95:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

MS1
[Galaxy S II General] NoRulesForMe:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Thanks Mate. But I will try LSD 1st then post result tom. With both on Siyah Latest. Then next is MS1.

Hope It_ler is fine with it posting it here?

:D
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, I'm fine with it.
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Sir It_ler sometimes I feel that the one reason I always fall short by 40 to 50 minutes from your on screen time is probably due to 3G. Most of my on screen time is with 3G, which I feel drains more battery than Wi-Fi in my area. I have seen your results, you usually have an screen on time of approx 2 hrs and battery loss being 30%.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SiyahKernel v6.0b5:

Good battery life in mixed usage.

Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,51% per hour, Wifi: 14,2%, Awake: 12,9%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,36%

It's slightly better than for previous kernel version on XWLS8, but worse than for stock/PhilZ-touch kernel.

It recognized that the screen on minimum CPU frquency was 500 MHz ... on stock / PhilZ kernel it is 200 MHz.

As I am a light user, that could probably made the difference.

Maybe I wil repeat the battery test with a changed minimum CPU frequency for screen on ... let's check STweaks settings.

... no STweaks setting for specifying a different minimum CPU frquency for screen on. I can't change it that easy.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] Farooq95:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Dude 3g is like batteryDemon......same with me...
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
i install Ms1 Neat rom lite is Good for me ,

Anyone know where I get "hold back to kill" (zip)??
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Kindly ask in NeatROM thread.

But Back2Kill mod for XWLSD should work too. This can be found in ApriliaM3's dev-host (link on NeatROM logo in my signature).
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
thanks, It_ler

work for me ..
[Galaxy S II General] lionsmatara:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

200 pages. ...:eek::D

2000 post :p:p:D:D

Good luck... :)
[Galaxy S II General] JeanGini:
Hello,

I have a pretty good battery life with chemeleon and phenomenal extreme. 1h40 screen, phone was on since 12h and i have 50% of battery.

What do you think ?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
It's ok.

Have you got a BBS dump or similar to show, what usage you had during this period of time?

Without proper information of the usage, it's difficult to say more about your battery life.
[Galaxy S II General] bogdan1980:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Yes, 500mhz minimum on siyah v6.0b5. Cry

Galaxy powered by GM and Dorimanx.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
With 200 MHz as minimum CPU frequency when screen on it would be my new daily driver ...

Will ask Many40, if he can do something about it.
[Galaxy S II General] JeanGini:
No I don't have an app like that. My phone sucked and i had to wipe data and reinstall the rom, otherwise the phone didn't boot.

I'll do that after some cycles
[Galaxy S II General] arshu16:
change your governer to pegasusq...it will fix the issue...it will not be default settings for your test but it's the only workaround
[Galaxy S II General] ecopy:
I would definitely suggest the same, it costs nothing but it's worth it. Also I'd set IO sheduler to sio. For the time being this kernel is better than any other I've tried for 4.1.2, and it's a pity that the default settings are far from the optimum.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-test SiyahKernel v6.0b5:

Similar battery life on second run in night use.

Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,5%

So no update of the first post needed.

Still on completely default settings.

Maybe I will change governor for next run.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] bogdan1980:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Lt_ler, could you pls tell me something on v6.0b5?

On gpu tab, what is the last voltage? Is 1.200v? tks

Mine at this version and on v6.0b4 is 1.200v for 267mhz. Default if 1.000v or something. .

Galaxy powered by GM and Dorimanx.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
STweaks > GPU > GPU VOLTAGE LEVEL5 = 1200 mV.

P.S.:

My xda username is "IT_LER" (not "LT_LER") ... like described in post #2.
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Hello. My first full run with XWLSD and siyah 6.0b5. All stock settings.
[Galaxy S II General] lionsmatara:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Wifi??? :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

No I do not use much Wi-Fi. My complete on screen time is with 3G and it eats battery. :)
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Stock 1650 battery?

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] bogdan1980:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Wow, 2 days and 3.5hours screen time. Impressive.

Galaxy powered by GM and Dorimanx.
[Galaxy S II General] kadivarz:
emm i see alot of testing here guys

just an advice from all your testing and experience

what is the best combination for a battery life in jb rom ......

i use alot of wifi

pls give name of the rom+ suitable kernel

i will be very gratful

Thx in advance
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
Re: [20 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Hello Bob. Yes it is stock 1650 battery.
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
Hi,

I have used stock, Wanam & NeatRom. Right now I am using Neat roms since last 6 months and no issues as such. you should give it a shot and see which suits you.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-re-test SiyahKernel v6.0b5:

Slightly better battery life in night use with Pegasusq governor. (Rest is still on default settings.)

Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 2,2%

But the difference is so small that it could be a normal variation.

Let's wait for its battery life in mixed usage.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] bogdan1980:
Re: [22 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

I was lovin xwlq3 +dorimanx 5.92. I got about 5-6 hours screen time on this with wifi on. Sometimes even 7 hours.

Now with xwlsd, jeboo, philz or siyah i got exactly. 4 hours screen time wifi on.

Same setup, same apps, apps disabled from strartup, sammy crap disabled, screen at 30%, stoped gps, 3g net, location, gnow.

Galaxy powered by GM and Dorimanx.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-re-test SiyahKernel v6.0b5:

Nearly the same battery life in mixed usage on the third run - even with Pegasusq governor. (Rest still default.)

Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 15,3%, Awake: 12,8%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%

It's only slightly better than with OnDemand governor ... normal variation IMO.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Jeboo v2.1:

I just flashed Jeboo kernel v2.1 on my XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3.

It is very stable and very smooth on my phone. Feels subjectively a little bit smoother than Siyah.

Everything works fine (wifi, bluetooth, camera, video recording, gallery, video player, live thumbnails, custom boot animation, GPS, etc.).

Still non-touch CWM recovery ... but it's ok.

Now preparing the battery tests.

As XXMS1 seems to be a release/version between XWLS8 and XWLSD (according to Tungstwenty's comparison), and XWLSE is only an XWLSD version with minor changes for Russia, I think I will stay on XWLSD for a while.

Waiting for really "new" ROM versions ...
[Galaxy S II General] mathmachado:
Re: [22 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Im on XXMS1 with jeebo 2.1, and its feels way more battery friendly then XXLSD!
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Any numbers/screenshots of battery stats?

As there is no "improvement" in the source code of this firmware, it might be "placebo".

But you never know ...
[Galaxy S II General] mathmachado:
Re: [22 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

I flashed yesterday morning, so Im at my second battery cycle on XXMS1. On LS8 and LSD I was getting 8%/h with mixed usage, and now on MS1 Im getting 3%/h, which its not incredible, but compared to the previous rom it is quite nice.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
That quite good IMO :good:

Maybe this ROM version fits very good to your phone, settings and usage.

Keep it for a while and enjoy your phone :fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S II General] agrakesh:
battery issue

hi i just flash neatrom full xwlsd version can anyone tell me which rom is best for mixed usage

and battery last long