yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SpeedMod K5-1:

Bad battery life in mixed usage.

SpeedMod K5-1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,77% per hour, Wifi: 36,2%, Awake: 15,5%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,59%

But it was my fault ... I used FireFox and forgot to kill it after closing the browser.

So FireFox app was running in the background, holding the internet/wifi connection all the time.

Grrr ... I have to repeat the battery test for SpeedMod ... sorry :(

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] -iNCEPTiON-:
Re: [12 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

No problems mate ... I think speedmod is famous for its good battery life so I guess It would be good results when u test it again :) waiting for the results and then I will flash that kernel ... as I am on philz kernel now ...
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-test SpeedMod K5-1:

Nearly the same battery life in night use.

SpeedMod K5-1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,60% per hour, Awake: 2,4%

Only the deep sleep ratio was a little bit worse - maybe due to a received email. So nothing to bother or blame the kernel.

Now I try to not use FireFox an get reliable battery stats for mixed usage.

(I am prepared with Back2Kill ... just in case ... :D)

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
i want share my battery results for you.. thanks for salesale :good:

so, i have orginal NeatRom Lite 4.3 with that Philz "stock" kernel. and i have disabled many apps.

battery left 8%, 2d 0h 22min.

screen time: 3h 42min 35sec

phone calls: 13min

gps use: 23min.

mobile data is off and i sync emails manually.

now i try that speedmod kernel :fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S II General] kadivarz:
JB

Bro this is one nice post and helpful

emm in this first line

NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,23% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,10%

which kernel is this ??? cause i have this rom but using siyah do you mean with its original kernel??

and if yes pls tell me how to roll it back

THX

REGARDS
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
@Vihru can you list out disabled apps???
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [13 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Use this as a guide http://bo.lt/i8igz

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] citytrader:
I'm using unmodiffied stock rom and kernel.

Here are the list of what I have uninstalled and remember to install BEFORE your favorite launcher,

in my case NOVA launcher, because with the native you could experiencie hangs after freezing the apps.

This is the list as I remember because I have uninstalled all this applications, but you can freeze them with Titanium.

ALLshareplay

AllShareservice

Android LiveWallpaper

DSMFOrwarding

DSMLawmo

Email (Maildroid free is better)

GMAIL

Google+

Google play Magazines

Help

MAPServicesamsung

News Daemon

Stock Daemon (something like this)

ReadersHUB

Samsung apps and all the Samsung ****

Samsung Cloud y todo lo de CLoud

SamsungAPPSUNA2

Accuweather daemon and the other that I dont remember

Yahoo all

Facebook all

SNS todo

Firmware update both

Face unlock

Google+

Voice Search (dont remember the correct name)

Exchange

After that modify the WIFI driver following this instructions:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=37326900

My phone is working flawlessly without any hangs or bootloops
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
It was with default PhilZ-touch kernel.

To get it back just flash the ROM again (non-wipe).

Good luck !
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-test SpeedMod K5-1:

Slightly better battery life in mixed usage.

SpeedMod K5-1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,57% per hour, Wifi: 33,9%, Awake: 13,9%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,41%

But again something weird with keeping up wifi connection ... maybe it was an calendar alarm.

I can't get "clean" mixed usage for SpeedMod kernel ... another re-test :confused:

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-re-test SpeedMod K5-1:

Again slightly better battery life in night use.

SpeedMod K5-1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,59% per hour, Awake: 1,7%

This time with better deep sleep ratio too.

Now the third (and last) try for getting "good" mixed usage test results.

I have disable all calendar alarms and still Back2Kill for FireFox ;)

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] Jul84:
Is quadrant supposed to be reliable?

I get anything between 3500 and 4880pts on LSD rom with speedmod kernel 5 1 at 1.4ghz...
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Oh ... I guess that you have just answered your question yourself.

That's why I think about skipping benchmark tests for future kernel tests.

Maybe AnTuTu is kind of reliable, as it gives better reproducable results.

Best performance "meter" IMO is the subjective experience of smoothness, stuttering, lags, scrolling, switching homescreens, playing videos, etc.
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [14 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Totally agree, Antutu will give me roughly the same score no matter how many times i try it on same kernel/ROM so thats the one i use when i do. Quadrant can vary between 3400 - 4300 on same kernel/ROM between 1 test and another without doing /touching anything between tests.

I don't put much emphasis on benchmarks as much as i used to, i used to base my decision purely on benchmarks:eek::rolleyes::D

I have grown to learn its not the be all and end all, but you can't deny its a nice feeling & reassurance when you get a high score! :D

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] OGroteKoning:
Re: [14 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Hehehe. I love your persistence! It is awesome the lengths you will go through to produce comparable consistent results. Your thread helps me to make informed decisions to keep or change kernels. I have similar usage as you and similar results, therefor I know what to expect with kernels on my S2. Beeeeeeeg thanks matey!

Sent from my Galaxy S2
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-re-test SpeedMod K5-1:

Nearly the same battery life in mixed usage.

SpeedMod K5-1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,56% per hour, Wifi: 18,6%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,41%

Wifi running ratio was better now, but the battery life is nearly unchanged.

So my system is stable and I can continue with testing other kernels.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] alkspo:
how did you overclock on speedmod? using setcpu i dont see 1400 ghz o_O
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Try to use Tegrak Overclock Ultimate app from Play store ... it's not free, but seems to work fine.

Read posts of successfully overclocking with this app.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Jeboo v1.3b:

I flashed Jeboo kernel v1.3b on my XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3.

It is very stable and very smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine (camera, video recording, gallery, video player, wifi bluetooth, GPS, etc.).

Moderate battery life in night use.

Jeboo v1.3b (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 2,2%

Worse than for previous kernel version. Maybe the battery stats chip was not settle down correctly.

Was a little bit in a hurry last night ... Valentine's Day ... you know ;)

So I may repeat this battery test.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
i have very wakelock "l2 hsic" is a modem wake lock ?
[Galaxy S II General] Many40:
"l2_hsic" (it's a commonly known problem with no final solution AFAIK yet):

- reboot after full charging

- don't disconnect a charger while screen is off (unlock first then disconnect)

- when you are already facing the wakelock removing battery for a few minutes might help

- As far as HISC is the interface that connected the main Soc processor to the modem the wakelock is most likely related to baseband / Radio Interface Layer (RIL) -> HSIC interface may be waken up by the modem (have you change your modem recently or facing any mobile data network issues?)

Regards
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [14 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Again! I find the same, 1.3b has definitely gotten more battery hungry since 1.1 days:thumbup:

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks for helping out :good:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks for sharing :good:

Similar results ... I'm glad that the geneal tendency of my tests can be confirmed by many other users :highfive:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Jeboo v1.3b:

Good battery life in mixed usage.

Jeboo v1.3b (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,50% per hour, Wifi: 14,0%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,35%

It's nearly the same as for v1.3 on XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2.

Maybe it could be slightly better on the second battery cycle.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-test Jeboo v1.3b:

Better battery life in night use on second run.

Jeboo v1.3b (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,2%

Now the battery stats chip was settled down correctly.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] Jul84:
Indeed, I use Tegrak as Set CPU doesn't allow oc/uv with speedmod.

It works like a charm but the CPU is always at the highest frequency when the screen is on. I don't know if it's because of speedmod but with other kernels it flucutates more.
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
Hello All, This is my first full run with XWLSD & Siyah. Phone conditions were,

Complete stock settings

In Developer options : Window Anim scale, Transitional Anim Scale & Animator Duration Scale set to 0.5

Lowest stock brightness

Motion Disabled

IM+ pro running in Push mode with 3 Accounts

WhatsApp

Maildroid Syncing 3 Email accounts in Manual Mode

XDA App in Manual Sync mode

number of apps frozen using TB and Startup disabled using Autostarts

Now moving to SpeedMod for another try.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-test Jeboo 1.3b:

Sightly better battery life in mixed usage too on second run.

Jeboo v1.3b (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 20,4%, Awake: 12,7%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,28%

That's what I call a solid contributor.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [16 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Philz v4.35 1st cycle:thumbup: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=38079886

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ-touch v4.35:

I flashed PhilZ-touch kernel v4.35 on my XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3.

It is very stable and very smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine (wifi, bluetooth, camera, video recording, gallery, video player, GPS, etc.).

Really nice features in CWM recovery.

Good battery life in night use.

PhilZ-touch v4.35 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%

It's nearly the same as for previous kernel version on th same ROM.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Very good battery life :good:

Hard for custom kernels to beat ;)
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [17 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Its good how we always come to the same conclusion about kernels even though our usage is very different:thumbup:

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ-touch v4.35:

Very good battery life in mixed usage.

PhilZ-touch v4.35 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,36% per hour, Wifi: 15,7%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,23%

It's the best result on XWLSD on my phone so far.

My phone likes PhilZ-touch kernel.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] mr_zuff:
Hey It_ler, new jeboo 2.0 is out!

We know that your phone probably prefer philz, but would be really nice if you try new jeboo! :)

anyway, good job as always :good:
[Galaxy S II General] Thisnameisepic:
Re: [17 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Don't worry, he is already aware ;)

Phone: Samsung Galaxy S2 GT-9100

ROM: NeatROM Lite 4.3 LSD

Kernel: Philz v4.35 LSD

Modem: XXLS8

External: SANDISK 32GB CLASS 10

THE RED BLUR's CAVE OF GUIDES ON FLASHING AND USING LSJ/LS8/LSD ROMS AND KERNELS + BONUS TOOLS

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=35923600
[Galaxy S II General] nellyp67:
Re: [17 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Anyone got a link for new kernel thanks
[Galaxy S II General] kingusienka:
Re: [17 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Here you go: http://d-h.st/QH8

--------------------

GT-I9100

NeatROM Lite 4.3

Kernel: Jeboo 2.0
[Galaxy S II General] nellyp67:
Re: [17 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Thank u
[Galaxy S II General] kadivarz:
GJ

Its really obvious and no denying that this post is one of the greatest helpful amazing posts

in the XDA which i personally puttin it on my bookmark

but dude i couldnt help but notice that all results for battery life with wifi in ls8 is better than lsd

shouldnt the samsung company would have made the newest version much better than before??

i mean is it just me or every one is feeling that XWLS8 is better than XWLSD specially in wifi ??

what you think ??
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
Re: [17 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Congrats It_ler my friend.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, I have already flashed Jeboo kernel v2.0 on my XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3.

It is very stable and very smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine so far (wifi, bluetooth, camera, gallery, video player, etc.).

Preparing for battery tests now.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I always prefer to run on the latest firmware (ROM and kernel) versions.

Sometimes an older version has better battery life and/or better performance on my phone ... but sometimes there are other things (like bug fixes, patches, etc.) includes in latest versions.

So IMO, the difference in battery life between XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2 and XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3 is not significant enough for me to switch back to XWLS8.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks :good:

(Again out of Thanks on PC ... and preparing battery test on my phone.)
[Galaxy S II General] perepelica:
what about the new kernel apolo? peoples says its great.

https://www.wuala.com/pedestre/Kernel/Apolo JB/?key=IZz8nJ7ajpFQ
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I have alread read about this kernel, but I really prefer kernels with a kernel thread here on xda.

It's because of the support/sources/transparency ... short: I feel better and safer by flashing a kernel with an official kernel thread here on xda.

As there are many different and very good kernels available here for my phone, I have enough to do with testinbg these kernels and its latest versions.

But you can test it and post your experiences here :good:
[Galaxy S II General] AllSeeyinEye:
Re: [17 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Besides it not having a thread on xda, recovery is in Spanish and the dev won't make an English version.

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Jeboo v2.0:

Good battery life in night use.

Jeboo v2.0 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,61% per hour, Awake: 1,7%

It's a very good deep sleep ratio.

Let's check its battery life in mixed usage now.
[Galaxy S II General] Emre9110:
xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=38112053&postcount=1031

I think u must look here dude. It is speedmod kernel which is undervolted. Same with Phenomenel :)
[Galaxy S II General] Thisnameisepic:
Re: [18 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

He is aware. :cool: I don't know if he will take the risk to test it but it would be nice if he did.

Phone: Samsung Galaxy S2 GT-9100

ROM: NeatROM Lite 4.3 LSD

Kernel: Philz v4.35 LSD

Modem: XXLS8

External: SANDISK 32GB CLASS 10

THE RED BLUR's CAVE OF GUIDES ON FLASHING AND USING LSJ/LS8/LSD ROMS AND KERNELS + BONUS TOOLS

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=35923600
[Galaxy S II General] Emre9110:
Deleted. Same post
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Oh .. you mean hiroX 5.1 from geroxx.

Yes, I'm aware of it.

Already donwloaded and thinking abot testing it.

But the last few hiroX kernel versions (on ICS), I have issues (FCs and SODs) ... on extreme and intensive ... even with medium.

That's why it could be that my phone does not support this kernel.

I will check after my current tests, and report back.

P.S.:

In my kernels-to-test list, I haven't explicitly listed hiroX kernel, as it a special variation of Phenomenal kernel IMO. But I consider to add it as an alternative name in the Phenomenal line.
[Galaxy S II General] alen1901:
Re: [18 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

It_ler, i noticed that you test battery life after a full charge(100%), but resolts are not consistent that way, some kernels drops more % from 100 to 95 than others. I would recommend testing battery from 80% :)

Sent from SpeedMachine i9100
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
That's a valid suggestion ... but ...

1. If the battery stats chip was settle down correctly, there should be no "irregular" drop in battery power level - regardless if it is from 100% or 80%.

2. And I always try to "simmulate" a realistic usage ... and I usally charge my phone up to 100% ... maybe I'm special, but that's the way I do it most of the time.

So I think I will continue to test that way too.

And as soon as I recognize some strange drop in battery power level, I will re-do the test.

Generally, you are right. 100% is not always the same. But I try to reproduce the same procedure for fully charging and settling down the battery stats chip. I really do my best. And hope that the results are reliable and comparable.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Jeboo v2.0:

Moderate battery life in mixed usage.

Jeboo v2.0 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,50% per hour, Wifi: 14,1%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,35%

It's slightly worse than for previous kernel version.

I expected/hoped that the new JB sources will lead to better battery life. Unfortunately not this time.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Unfortunately ... as expected ... my phone does not boot with hiroX 5.1 extreme.

As even recovery mode didn't work correctly (sometimes black screen, sometimes unresponsive, sometimes auto-rebooting), I had to re-flash the ROM as tar file with Odin in download mode.

Now restorng my last nandroid backup of XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3 with PhilZ-touch v4.35 (including preload).

As it was very time-consuming to get out of this issue, I don't want to test flashing another hiroX 5.1 version.

I think I have to skip hiroX kernels and flash another one. Or I will stay on PhilZ and wait for new SiyahKernel.
[Galaxy S II General] Thisnameisepic:
Re: [18 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

No problem mate. Thanks for the feedback and sorry you had to go through all this. Hirox kernel has uv "integrated" in it so if something goes wrong then even recovery won't work normally. That would be a nightmare for me since my laptop broke down last week add Iam still waiting for a replacement.

Phone: Samsung Galaxy S2 GT-9100

ROM: NeatROM Lite 4.3 LSD

Kernel: Philz v4.35 LSD

Modem: XXLS8

External: SANDISK 32GB CLASS 10

THE RED BLUR's CAVE OF GUIDES ON FLASHING AND USING LSJ/LS8/LSD ROMS AND KERNELS + BONUS TOOLS

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=35923600
[Galaxy S II General] geroxx:
AW: [18 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

I am sorry for all these issues you have with the kernel. I think your device don't like me :confused:

If i remember rightly you said that Phenomenal works normal or? I don't really have an idea what cause that problems. hmmm...

- geroxx -
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re: [18 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Correct. I can run all Phenomenal Extreme versions without any issue. But everytime I flash a hiroX kernel (and I have tested extreme, intensive and medium on ICS), my phone gets in trouble.

It's a pity, as I really want to test your kernel.
[Galaxy S II General] AllSeeyinEye:
Re: [18 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Huh??! Since when do you have my phone? :p I experience the exact same thing with Hirox kernels, though I can run every version of Phenomenal...

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] kadivarz:
Nice work am so impressed

ever thought of joining samsung company or any digital products company??
[Galaxy S II General] zg_trotter:
Hello folks !

I'm following Mr. It_ler and his great work with all those tests and compares kernels and Rom's...wonderful peace of work :good:

So after few different kernel flashes and lots of reading, I decide to install Speedmod-kernel-s2-jb-k5-1-CWM.... and after few days of testing I'm

extremely satisfied with battery life :D

The best battery life I ever have...

I don't have any tweeks, only reduced start up list created with ES task manager/start up manager....

I made a few screenshots of my last test

Phone: SGS2 (GT-I9100)

ROM: XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2

Kernel: SpeedMod K5-1

Extras: XWLS8_Aroma_Mods_v4.2b

Extras: Pure Icons pack_VRTheme- XXLSJ_LS8
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Re: [18 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Nice, but maybe you should turn off fast Dormancy;) https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.gokhanmoral.fastdormancytoggle.i9300

*NeatROM*
[Galaxy S II General] cnjax:
Re: [18 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Siyah 6.0b5 is out

GT-I9100 powered by

NeatRom Lite 4.3 LSD baby

SiyahKernel 6.0b5+

Many40's battery tweaks
[Galaxy S II General] arshu16:
geroxx's 5.1 kernel(extreme) is giving good battery life...you should try it..
[Galaxy S II General] Hilmesh:
Hello All, This is my first full run with XWLSD & SpeedMOD K5-1. Phone conditions were,

*) Complete stock settings

*) In Developer options : Window Anim scale, Transitional Anim Scale & Animator Duration Scale set to 0.5

*) Lowest stock brightness

*) Motion Disabled

*) IM+ pro running in Push mode with 3 Accounts

*) WhatsApp

*) Maildroid Syncing 3 Email accounts in Manual Mode

*) XDA App in Manual Sync mode

number of apps frozen using TB and Startups disabled using Autostarts. Now moving to Hirox 5.1.
[Galaxy S II General] geroxx:
AW: [18 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

look:
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
hiroX 5.1 extreme dont work me either..it boot and i got system up.. but then freezing.. i must now install whole system again..

because restore didnt helped.. only bootloop after that.. i liked very much that phemonenal 6.1 extreme when i was in ICS...

but be careful with that hiroX 5.1 extreme.. you have been warned :p

BTW: Jeboo 2.1 out

DOWNLOAD: http://d-h.st/zXv

v2.1

-- Reverted init binary to LSJ to fix bootloop and cleaned up some sammy bloat in initramfs

-- Thanks to all the testers for this update! =)
[Galaxy S II General] arshu16:
Re: [18 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Oh okay..
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
So, there are some new kernels to test.
[Galaxy S II General] zg_trotter:
fiedmenu sancta

It was turned off, but I have a few recoveries and forget about Dormancy ;)
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
l_ter, can you test SpeedMod kernel?

[KERNEL] SpeedMod SGS2 Jelly Bean [K5-1 CIFS ROOT / NO-ROOT CWM5
[Galaxy S II General] faraaz:
Look at the 2nd post, it's listed in his "kernels-to-test" list....
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Have both a closer look at the first post :eek:

I have already tested SpeedMod K5-1 ... three times.

1. Run => http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=37905948&postcount=1901

2. Run => http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=37946849&postcount=1910

3. Run => http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=37995265&postcount=1916