yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPX:

Now a second run with wifi "always" on.

Night use:

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,75% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%

Mixed usage:

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,61% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,4%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,44%

Good battery life and stable results, but a little worse than before ... so no update of the first post needed.
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
thanks forme in xwlpx when wi-fi is on and mixed usage is horrible battery life poor ...

3g is best batterly then wi-fi in mixed usage

now.. in night use wi-fi is good
[Galaxy S II General] Bluetoth10:
Отправлено с моего Nexus 7 через Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] gamal001:
Hi It_ler ,

few days I not see you , any problems ?

I hope your good .
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
how about that XWLPY?
[Galaxy S II General] Catscratch:
Very interesting would results about the Kernel+ROM combination. So that you could see which is a good combination for e.g. battery lifetime oder maximum performance.
[Galaxy S II General] 00raq00:
Exists XWLPY ? Maybe UHLPY ?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
No problem ... just a short vacation ... want to minimize the internet connection as it is expensive here (compared to my home location).

I am still on my last combination: Phenomenal 6.1. Extreme on XWLPX ROM.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Can not find XWLPY right now.

If you have a direct link, I can check what version it is.
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
sorry.. i meaned UHLPY..
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
No, I don't have tested this ROM version ... I want to wait for the first stock JB ROMs ... I am an optimist :fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S II General] gamal001:
Take your time and enjoy with your vacation . :cowboy::cowboy::cowboy:
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
hey, i have new idea that might be interesting.. they said that dorimanx is also very good at battery life with that battery PROFILE and tweaking it.

3d 17h and screentime 5h 48min.. with orginal battery.. not bad at all.

lt_ter, do you have any intrests to test that Dorimanx with battery profile settings?
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
share whith us, your settings, rom, kernel version of dorimanx ,, please
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Latest Dorimanx kernel for ICS is already on my "kernels-to-test" list.

I will first test it with default profile.

If that has good battery life, I might test battery profile too.
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
look this.. NeatROM XWLPT + Dorimanx 5.82 with battery profile. not bad deep sleep at all.

also i used that GregX80 custom ExTweaks profile with undervolting.

there is that ExTweaks profile and settings that undervolting.http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=31925979&postcount=6852

BUT i have 3500mAh battery.

im very happy with this!
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v5.87:

I just flashed DorimanX v5.87 on my stock XWLPX ROM.

Everything seems to work fine so far.

It is stable and feels smooth on my phone.

Good benchmark results (added to first post), new high score in CF-Bench and AnTuTu ... but worst result in Linpack (multi-thread).

Maybe the second core is not activated properly when running this benchmark.

Now I am charging the battery for night use/mixed usage battery tests.

P.S.:

Everything on default setting / profile.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Dorimanx v5.87:

Again a very good deep sleep ratio and a very good battery life in night use.

Dorimanx v5.87: Battery loss of 0,69% per hour, Awake: 5,0%, Deep sleep: 95%

Only Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme had a slightly better battery life in night use on my phone.
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
yes and that results with normal profile.. :p

are you going to test that with battery profile?
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Is LPY on your list to test?

Powered by NeatROM

---------- Post added at 03:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:23 PM ----------

My CPU spy doesn't have them stats at the bottom?

Edit: i have now:p

Powered by NeatROM
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v5.87:

Fantastic battery life in mixed usage.

Dorimanx v5.87: Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,0%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%

Nearly as good as for my best run with Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPT ROM.

And everything on default settings/profile.

Now I want to check its battery life with extreme battery profile.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, I will test DorimanX v5.87 with extreme battery profile (set within ExTweaks app).
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
No, I want to wait for the first JB stock ROMs.
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
open CWM and there is that kernel profil change in dorimanx. then extweaks settings..
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Done ... system feels less smooth ... I think that's the price we have to pay for the (extreme) battery profile.
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
lt_ler.. when gregx80 release settings for dorimanx.. then it can be the best kernel for battery life..

hope he post it today..
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Dorimanx v5.87:

With extreme battery profile, I have a little bit worse battery life in night use on my phone.

Dorimanx v5.87 (extreme battery profile): Battery loss of 0,82% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%

Maybe battery life in night use could be better with cortex brain service disabled?!
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Dorimanx v5.87:

Also slightly worse bettery life in mixed usage with extreme battery profile.

Dorimanx v5.87 (extreme battery profile): Battery loss of 1,59% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,8%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,43%

On my phone, Dorimanx's default settings are better.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v5.88:

I just flashed DorimanX v5.88 on my XWLPX stock ROM.

Everything seems to work fine so far.

It is stable and feels smooth on my phone.

Benchmark results already added to the first post.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v5.88:

Nearly the same battery life in night use than with DorimanX v5.87.

Dorimanx v5.88: Battery loss of 0,72% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%

Although there are many alarm wakelocks (I think from Cortex brain service), its deepsleep ratio is very good ... and as consequence the battery life in night use too.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v5.88:

Slightly worse battery life in mixed usage compared to v5.87 too.

Dorimanx v5.88: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,2%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,46%

Oh ... v5.89 is released. Maybe I should try it out.
[Galaxy S II General] superleeds27:
Becoming a fan of DorimanX's work
[Galaxy S II General] j1gga84:
Better a late fan than never ;)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v5.89:

A little bit worse battery life in night use.

Dorimanx v5.89: Battery loss of 0,81% per hour, Awake: 5,7%, Deep sleep: 94%

Maybe I have to flash another kernel after this "Dori" tests.
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
it_ler shun andromeda kernel the next? or dream kernel 2.7.5
[Galaxy S II General] dexvholt:
Please start testing the kernels with JB-mali drivers (Dorimanx 7.1/7.2/7.3/...) Thank you for your hardwork
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Maybe Shun Andromeda.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I want to wait for the first Samsung/stock JB ROM versions.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v5.89:

Worse battery life in mixed usage compared to v5.87 and v5.88 too.

Dorimanx v5.89: Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,9%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%

So the last optimazations/changes on the kernel seem to be not very battery friendly ... at least for me.

Now it's time to test another kernel.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Shun Andromeda 2.1.2:

I just flashed Shun Andromeda 2.1.2 on my XWLPX stock ROM.

Everything works fine so far.

It is stable and smooth on my phone.

Benchmarks running now.

Will add the results to first post as soon as all tests are finished.

EDIT:

Benchmark results added to first post.
[Galaxy S II General] THE RED BLUR:
Could u kindly let Dorimanx know this please via pm. I'm sure this would be good info for him to tweak kernel so it goes back on track again. :)

PHONE : SGSII

Sent via: Tapatalk 2

Main ROM: RootBOX jb 2.9 mali (ONLINE)

2nd Rom: RR ics 2.7- Not accessible

KERNEL : Dorimanx 7.3 Mali

MODEM : LPS

GAPPS : JusTunBean aroma 3.2
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Done !

As a part of the team, I always want Dori to be up-to-date.

But I am sure that he is already aware of this ... I have read some posts that he plans to add changes for better battery life in the next kernel versions.
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
i'flash dorimanx 5.87 in my xwlpx rom, is wonderful kernel in first cycle , my test is Running
[Galaxy S II General] Manczyslaw:
I hope do not do any spam im using xda forum for years but now i made my account

I dont know if its important but when i set 400mhz gpu clock 4th step in extweaks it never works

Phone get stuck just long power press can shutdown, but if i set voltage to 1150 in step 4th it seems to work

Fps in quadrant benchmark stays 60+ on dori 7.1 and 2012.10.13 vsync experimental i got 5100~ score

And gta 3 worked without frame limiter like a butter so gpu seems work at 400mhz at this voltage i confrim allso

good stability with voltage of 1200. I just wait when dori makes sql get io work faster on new kernel versions
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Shun Andromeda 2.1.2:

Nice battery life in night use.

Shun Andromeda 2.1.2: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 5,4%, Deep sleep: 94%

Really good deep sleep ratio ... maybe it could have a better battery life in second battery cycle.
[Galaxy S II General] dexvholt:
I think the main reason why people are on xda is to have the latest sources, your tests are so good that now, I guess, a lot of people are on JB, I think,it's time for you too to make the change, I bother asking because you're a very good kernel tester and you know how to take the best from it!! Thank you for your hard work, it helped me in the ICS days hope it will continue with the change!!

Cheers!! :D
[Galaxy S II General] californicated:
OP is on Samsung stock roms only. No JB stock rom -> no JB Kernel test
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Shun Andromeda 2.1.2:

Moderate battery life in mixed uasge.

Shun Andromeda 2.1.2: Battery loss of 1,78% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,2%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,60%

It's not the best battery life on my phone, but it's better than for previous kernel versions.

So I will keep an eye :cyclops: on new versions.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DM kernel 1.2:

I just flashed this kernel on my XWLPX stock ROM.

Everything seems to work fine so far, but the GPS toggle.

As I like to have all features/options working and the kernel thread is (temporarily) closed, I will skip this kernel (version).

Will also remove it (temporarily) from my "kernels-to-test" list.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DreamKernel 2.7.5:

I just flashed DreamKernel 2.7.5 on my XWLPX stock ROM.

Everything works fine so far.

It is stable and feels smooth on my phone.

Benchmark results already added to first post.

EDIT:

Blue-ish color easily corrected by changing the Blue color value in ExTweaks.

But I have still a problem with CWM Manager app. CWM Mananger app 3.15 is supported, but it is removed after each boot.
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
it_ler

a install xwlpx rom whith phenomenal 6.1 extreme it's worse than dorimanx 5.87

bad, bad, good deep sleep but %/h high. do you know about this? kernel bug?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DreamKernel 2.7.5:

Moderate battery life in night use.

DreamKernel 2.7.5: Battery loss of 0,81% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%

It is little bit worse than for an older version of this kernel ... hopefully its battery life in mixed usage will be better.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Nothing special.

Sometimes there is a good kernel/ROM combination, and sometimes not.

On stock XWLPT ROM, Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme had best battery life ever on my phone.

Maybe it's different on other phones and with other usage.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DreamKernel 2.7.5:

Moderate battery life in mixed usage too.

DreamKernel 2.7.5: Battery loss of 1,79% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,0%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,61%

And it's again a little bit worse than for older version of this kernel.

I think that I have to test another kernel.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0:

I just flashed Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 on my XWLPX stock ROM.

After first boot, GPS toggle did not work properly, but after wiping cache and Dalvik cache and rebooting, everything works fine now.

It is stable and smooth on my phone.

Benchmark results are already added to the first post.
[Galaxy S II General] marco.fuce:
How can i give you 5 star rating?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
1. You can give this thread a 5-star rating by clicking the rating link at the top of the thread and selecting the 5-stars. (in browser, not available in xda app AFAIK)

2. If you want to express that you like my contribution, then simply click the "Thanks" button at the bottom of my post. (in browser, in xda app just long-press the post, scroll to the right in the actions menu and select "Thanks" in your language)

That's enough motivation for me to continue my "work".
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0:

Slightly worse battery life in night use compared to previous version.

Shun Andromeda 2.2.0: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%

Let's check its battery life in mixed usage now.
[Galaxy S II General] THE RED BLUR:
Hi mate. I was wondering if u could share ur methods of battery monitoring. What apps are u using. :)

I use gsm battery, and the stock android battery monitor . The trouble with external apps like gsm is if you reboot the phone it resets the monitoring which can be annoying as I prefer the extra info these apps provide .

The built in one is the only one I know that continues monitoring no matter the reboot.

PHONE : SGSII

Sent via: Tapatalk 2

Main ROM: RootBOX jb 2.9 mali (ONLINE) 17-10-12

2nd Rom: RR ics 2.7- Not accessible

KERNEL : Dorimanx 7.3 Mali

MODEM : LPS

GAPPS : JusTunBean aroma 3.2
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I am using BetterBatteryStats (BBS thread here => http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1179809)

That's it.

It has everything I need for recording my battery statistics.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0:

Better battery life in mixed usage.

Shun Andromeda 2.2.0: Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,2%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%

Seems that this kernel is on the right way :good:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SpeedMod K3-31:

I just flashed SpeedMod K3-31 on my XWLPX stock ROM.

Everything seems to work fine so far.

It is stable and very smooth on my phone.

Benchmark results already added to first post.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SpeedMod K3-31:

Excellent deep sleep ratio in night use.

SpeedMod K3-31: Battery loss of 0,73% per hour, Awake: 5,0%, Deep sleep: 95%

Good decision to test this kernel.

Only Phenomenal and DorimanX had slightly better battery life in night use on my phone.
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
@It_ler, what is the smoothest and snappiest kernel you ever tested in your opinion?

If no more kernels were gonna be made and you could only have 1 kernel for the rest of your time with S2 which would you choose?

*NEW* NeatROM® 3.5 Smoother than a babys bum!
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Difficult to answer ... I am only looking at my last stock ICS kernel tests.

SiyahKernel v4.1.5 was very, very smooth on my phone ... and it was super stable.

Even its benchmark rsults were not always the best, I nominate this kernel as smothest and snappiest I ever had on my phone.

In terms of bettery life, the best kernel I ever had on my phone was Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme.

As it runs very stable on my phone (and I feel very lucky for that), this kernel might be my first choice ATM.

But DorimanX v5.87 was very close to it.
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Thanks, i would probably go with Dorimanx 5.87 too as Phenomenal isn't worth the trade off in performance where as Dorimanx is very smooth and gives great benchmarks and decent battery! :)

NeatROM© 3.5 - Smoother than a babys bum!
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
please test new Dorimanx 5.9.. it should be better than old one :p
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
:D ... guess which kernel I have just downloaded to flash next to my phone :confused:

I just want to finish the running battery test for SpeedMod K3-31 before :good:
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Been using for a couple of days now, doesn't seem as smooth and benchmarks slightly worse than 5.87 for me.

Its got the new scheduler "fiops"

NeatROM© 3.5 - Smoother than a babys bum!
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
:victory::good: i just flashed it.. and testing know.. hope it beat that phenomenal now :p
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SpeedMod K3-31:

Good battery life in mixed usage too.

SpeedMod K3-31: Battery loss of 1,64% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,1%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,48%

So there is absolutely no issue with SpeedMod on XWLPX stock ROM ... at least on my phone.

Always a stable alternative for every other kernel.
[Galaxy S II General] PholkLorr:
Yea, im interested to see how the new fiops scheduler would perform.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v5.90:

I just flashed ... as already suggested by some users ... DorimanX v5.90 on my XWLPX stock ROM.

Everything seems to work fine so far.

It is stable and smooth on my phone.

Benchmark results are added to the first post.

Now I am preparing battery tests.

EDIT:

Everything (like always) on default settings/profile.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v5.90:

Worse battery life in night use.

Dorimanx v5.90: Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 93%

Maybe its battery life in mixed usage is better.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
DorimanX v5.90:

Worse battery life in mixed usage too.

Dorimanx v5.90: Battery loss of 1,76% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,0%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,58%

So on my phone and with my normal usage, DorimanX v5.87 has best battery life for all DorimanX kernel versions.
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
yes, for me 5.87 the best dori job,

now i'm testing JB on Syiah 5.0b1 is good kernel ,

test syiah It_ler http://d-h.st/users/siyah/testing i think , run smooth in sammy roms
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Latest and probably last SiyahKernel version is on my "kernels-to-test" list.

But first I want to test XWLPY stock ROM, as this is newer than XWLPX with higher changelist number/value.

And I like Gokhanmoral's stable releases ...
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
I read about uhlpy is very battery friendly is great rom, gokahn moral is leave dev for s2 only s3. I want buy s3 in christmas but in brasil s3 unlocked operator free is us$ 900, the s2 600 us really high prices
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Is video and youtube working on Siyah 5 yet?

NeatROM© 3.5 - Smoother than a babys bum!
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Uhh ... really expensive.

In Germany, we can buy an unbranded, SIM-lock free SGS2 (GT-I9100) for about 329,- € ATM.

And an unbranded, SIM-lock free SGS3 (GT-I9300) for about 458,- € ATM.

Yes, XWLPY seems to be a good Android 4.0.4 ROM version, will add its benchmark results soon to first post.

I am still preparing battery tests.

And yes, SiyahKernel is very good too. I will also miss new versions of this kernel in future.

But I am still happy with my SGS2.

Let's wait for the first stock JB ROMs ...
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Stock XWLPY:

I just flashed the pre-rooted XWLPY stock ROM with PhilZ-CWM6 kernel.

It is very stable and very smooth.

Everythig works fine so far.

Benchmark results already added to first post.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Stock XWLPY:

Worse battery life in night use compared to XWLPX.

XWLPY: Battery loss of 0,90% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 93%

Maybe the battery stats chip was not settled down correctly?!

After the mixed usage battery test I decide if I will repeat the battery tests on a second battery cycle.
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
I think XWLPY is the best ICS version so far, newest NeatROM is based on it and it is so smooth and fast, I really recommend you try out newest NeatROM 3.5 XWLPY It_ler, even for a day, it is basically stock with tweaks for speed, smoothness and battery, you may find what you've been looking for in a ROM/Kernel and everything always works, no bugs, nothing!

NeatROM® Beautiful & Smooth like Cheryl Coles butt.
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
i agree that.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Stock XWLPY:

Moderate battery life in mixed usage on my phone.

XWLPY: Battery loss of 1,89% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,70%

What to do now? Second battery cycle for XWLPY, try Phenomenal on XWLPY or restore my last nandroid backup of XWLPX?!

Maybe in that sequence.
[Galaxy S II General] californicated:
Are you sure you removed all the bloatware like you did it before?

Flashed XWLPY, charged and set it to flightmode before going to bed. This morning still 100% battery and 99,5% deepsleep :D
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I have double-checked the apps ... exactly the same deactivated "system" apps like on XWLPX and the other stock ROMs before.

And I am checking all wakelocks, processes and alarms in BBS after each battery test ... nothing "new" detected.

As the second night use on stock XWLPY had even worse battery life on my phone, I just flashed Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme and will check battery life with this kernel again.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPY:

After stock XWLPY had worse battery life on second battery cycle too, I flashed Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme.

It is stable and smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine.

Its battery life in night use is very good.

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme (XWLPY): Battery loss of 0,72% per hour, Awake: 5,7%, Deep sleep: 94%

Slightly worse than on XWLPT and XWLPX and nearly the same as for best DorimanX kernel versions.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPY:

Good battery life in mixed usage.

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme (XWLPY): Battery loss of 1,71% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,5%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,54%

But it's worse than on XWLPT, XWLPX and XWLPW.

Ok, I'll give it a second battery cycle. Then I decide if I stay on XWLPY or go back to XWLPX.
[Galaxy S II General] californicated:
You'd change your rom back because of 0,0X higher battery drain? XWLPY is sooo smooth :D
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
You are quite right.

XWLPY feels smoother than XWLPX and the difference of battery life is small ... I hope that it has better battery life on second cycle.

So, I will decide later about my new/old base ROM for further kernel tests.
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
i like lpy is a good rom, but i like ripple effect and "hold back to kill" ..

only simplistic xwlpx have this

i waiting new JB rom or nem features in xwlpy
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme on XWLPY:

Slightly better battery life in mixed usage on second battery cycle.

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme (XWLPY): Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,0%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%

But it is still a little bit worse than on XWLPT and XWLPX.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Decision made: My new base ROM for further kernel test is XWLPY now.

First post already changed ... old test results moved to post #3 and following.
[Galaxy S II General] humble55:
still wait that you will try to test the the kernels with MIUI Rom.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I won't flash a custom ROM now.

Please test the kernels on the ROM you like yourself.

You are welcome to post you results here.