yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Dorimanx v8.13:

I just flashed Dorimanx v8.13 on my XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1.

It is stable and smooth on my phone.

Every thing seems to work fine so far (gps, wifi, bluetooth, camera, video recording, gallery, fm radio, etc.) ...

... except the live thumbnails in (Galaxy Note II) video player are broken (only black thumbnails).

And the TriangleAway app support is gone ... I think former versions of Dorimanx had the full support for this app (no messages on app start, directly showing device status and resetting without rebooting).

But I am not sure any more. Maybe it's only on SiyahKernel.

EDIT:

Benchmark results of AnTuTu:

1. run: 9602

2. run: 9189

3. run: 9086

Hmm ... not very constant/stable ?!
[Galaxy S II General] Emre9110:
On boot is it seen triangle ? And what is note's video player?
[Galaxy S II General] NoRulesForMe:
Deleted

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
As I have flashed the kernel zip file in CWM recovery, I didn't have a triangle at boot. I just checked the TA app support.

I have installed the Galaxy Note II Gallery + live thumbnail video player. Flashed a mod containing the Gallery and Video Player apps from the Galaxy Note II. I think originally the mod was for XWLSD NeatROM. Is on ApriliaM3's dev-host site.

The live thumbnails worked on stock/PhilZ and SpeedMod kernel, but no longer on Dorimanx.
[Galaxy S II General] NoRulesForMe:
This was a good result I want to test it tom. Just want to share :D

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] bogdan1980:
On lsn neatrom/dorimanx 8.13, live thumbs video is working just fine, tested right now.
[Galaxy S II General] Jeetu:
Thnx for reporting.. :)
[Galaxy S II General] alen1901:
Wow, your phone really doesnt like UV at all. Too shame. :)

Sent from SpeedMachine i9100

---------- Post added at 07:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:44 PM ----------

Did you check temperatures? Maybe cpu got hot so thats why resolts are lowering?

Sent from SpeedMachine i9100
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
1. Phenomenal Extreme works fine on my phone. It only dislikes nearly every version of HiroX kernel.

I don't know why. Geroxx must do something different than fenomeno83.

2. Yes, the phone was charging and I repeated the benchmark tests. So the phone was getting warmer and warmer.

I will repeat the benchmark after the battery test. Under "normal" conditions.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Ok, I already had that issue before ... maybe the wiping cache and Dalvik cache caused the black live thumbnails.

If I remember correctly, the rebuilding of the live thumbnails take a long time ... I will observe and report back.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
You're welcome to post your experiences and results here.
[Galaxy S II General] bogdan1980:
I mean this one, DORIMANX+ SIYAH STOCK VIDEO FIX CWM_signed
[Galaxy S II General] kadivarz:
the exact stuff that happens with u happens with me

the black thumbnails part from the kernel cause i flashed the mod live thumbnails again and worked

this only happened with siyah 6.4

and my phone hates Uv too :D

just wanted to tell

thx and nice thread
[Galaxy S II General] loginsvarios:
Thanks for this tread!

So useful info in one place...
[Galaxy S II General] 70x7:
Deleted
[Galaxy S II General] NoRulesForMe:
Thank you mate. Mr.Many40 post a result of Jeboo2.1 he got 6hrs.&53mins on it Nice right? :thumbup: :D

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Dorimanx v8.13:

Very bad batttery life in night use.

Dorimanx v8.13 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,75% per hour, Awake: 3,5%

Was caused by wifi running nearly all the time ... although I had set the wifi policy in system settings (Advanced wifi settings) to keep wifi active only when the phone is plugged in.

So I set the corresponding setting in STweaks > auto-wifi TICKED now and delay to automatically turn off wifi after 30 sec (default value).

I will repeat the over-night battery test.

P.S.:

Now AnTuTu gave 9677.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-flashing of the NotesIIGallery+LIVEthumbnailVideoPlayer mod could not repair my live thumbnails. (still black)

And it is the Gallery and Videp Player app from the Galaxy Notes II.

(Updated my previous post.)
[Galaxy S II General] fradbari:
Hi,

but you prefere the 8.12 or the leatest (for battery life)?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Haven't tested Dorimanx v8.12 (or v8.11) ... only v8.13.

I like to run on latest/newest releases :D
[Galaxy S II General] SPBoss:
How do you get such bad deep sleep with 8.13? I lose an average of 0.31% an hour with WiFi on (keep WiFi on during sleep set to always) maybe your ROM is bad

Also if u have set performance or extreme performance profile it enables crontasks so it does database optimisation, zip aligning, etx, around 4am which wakes device and takes a few minutes to complete..

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
I can answer that:

1. The ROM is definitely not at fault and is probably the most battery friendly ROM available. All other kernels were tested on NeatROM too.

2. Everything is default settings (as it comes)

3. If its bad, its bad. Thats how it compares to other kernels on It_lers phone with It_lers setup & apps.

4. I can confirm all his results match what i conclude too.

★NeatROM★ Goodies
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I can understand your point.

That's why I said that I will repeat the night use battery test for Dorimanx.

On the first run, I had significantly longer wifi running times (compared to other kernels on the same ROM).

So I enabled the auto-wifi option to disable wifi after 30 sec.

On the second run, I had some calendar alarms/alerts during the night (who has enabled the notification ?! ... must have been me) ... what caused significantly higher screen on time.

So I will re-do the over-night test again (for the last time) ... with auto-wifi option enabled and all calendar notifications disbaled.

As you can see, I don't blame neither the kernel nor the ROM for getting bad battery life during the night.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Dorimanx v8.13:

Fantastic battery life in mixed usage.

Dorimanx v8.13 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,34% per hour, Wifi: 12,4%, Awake: 11,8%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,21%

And this with very bad battery life during the night.

If I can get better battery life over-night, the battery life in mixed usage could be even better.

This kernel has great potential IMO :good:

And except of the auto-wifi option, I am still on default settings :fingers-crossed:

Here some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] alen1901:
Can you tell about smoothness of dorimanx? Whats scrolling like etc, better or worse than lets say philz, jeboo.. because some said that dorimanx isnt that smooth in scrolling. So just to check

Sent from SpeedMachine i9100
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Just my subjective "feeling":

On first and second boot, Dorimanx v8.13 felt a little bit lagy with some stuttering while scrolling ... especially between homescreens with many widgets and on long sides (browser/xda-app) with some pictures.

But after several restarts, it feels much smoother now. ATM I can not find any difference in smoothness compared to stock/PhilZ kernel.

As it's some time ago when I was running on Jeboo kernel, I can hardly compare the subjective smoothness.

Maybe I will flash latest Jeboo kernel after finishing all tests on Dorimanx.
[Galaxy S II General] SPBoss:
So why do I get such little drain compared to his? Doesn't make sense, I'm on chameleon ROM if it helps

Sent from my GT-I9100

---------- Post added at 08:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:03 PM ----------

I used jeboo 2.1 and then went to dorimanx 8.13. Jeboo is very smooth but now and then you get occasional stutters :)

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Congratulations for having such good battery life :good:

But please no "my ROM is better than yours" discussion here ... Thanks for your understanding.

Thanks for sharing your experiences !
[Galaxy S II General] SPBoss:
Heh:p no ROM is best, depends on what the user wants;)

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] NoRulesForMe:
I don't like the Tone you said his Rom is bad. Maybe your just want to pick a fight here. If you don't trust his result then get out of here. Show us your result Prove it! Don't just talk and talk about battery life. Maybe you even can't achieve 6hrs. Screen time :p

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] SPBoss:
Please tell me where I said his ROM is bad? Stop plucking imaginary quotes out of thin air.

I achieve 5hours screen on time with 1.6ghz CPU and 400mhz GPU. With stock I get 6.5hours. If you don't believe me search my post in dorimanx thread. Screenshots and proof is there.

I will not upload again as xda image uploading is abysmal and never works on the android app.

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] NoRulesForMe:
Here. I know you said here "maybe" but for me your accusing it. Your the one need to Stop

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] NoRulesForMe:
Here are my result for Jeboo 2.1 Neatrom Lsn 4.6.1 with Mr.Bob removable apps. And greenify all my games... I plug my phone to the pc bec. I upload last nyt my SystemUi.apk so I had 4bars added on the battery even though I don't want it to add on my battery cycle. Btw here is my result :)... Use my phone for Messaging, More Calls, music, use stock browser for Fb and Youtube and etc.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] xanthrax:
I'm on dorimanx 4.2a also, zeta rom, so far so good and the deep sleep is amazing, I'll play around today with those new settings, I'm so impressed if this Guy!!! ✔★★★★★
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Although deep sleep is very good, I had very high battery consumption during the night:

Dorimanx 4.2A: Battery loss of 2,27% per hour, Awake: 6,6%, Deep sleep: 93%

Maybe I have to re-do the battery tests after wiping cache partition and Dalvik cache.
[Galaxy S II General] j1gga84:
Same here, also very high battery consumption so I switched to Shun now :good:

Regards
[Galaxy S II General] Addicted2Speed:
Nice work :good:
[Galaxy S II General] DeshTwo:
Shun v2.0.3 is out !!! Better than previous, definitivly one of the best

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9100 avec Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] Ku4t0:
Could you put the link please? In xda shunkernel thread 2.0.2 is the last version...
[Galaxy S II General] DeshTwo:
It's bêta test actually only available on galaxys team forum, Bgn9000 Will update xda thread soon ;)

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9100 avec Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] nemisi:
What about speedmods new releases ?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks for the suggestion.

Last tested SpeedMod version was SpeedMod K3-21, but I had some trouble with this version => http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=28234954&postcount=198

Hardcore has removed K3-22 and K3-23 versions, as they also had some issues.

SpeedMod K3-24 is already on my "kernels-to-test" list.

Have to finish my current tests before ... and maybe I will check a new stock ROM too.
[Galaxy S II General] dragon135:
There is known bug in speedmod kernel sometime hang at boot logo. Just long press power button until it turns off and then turn it on again solved the problem. For me it's not a big deal.

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
On SpeedMod K3-21 that coul dnot solve the problem for me.

I tried everything that came to my mind ... always stuck on bootlogo.

That's why I had to flash another kernel.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Aborted battery tests for Dorimanx 4.2A, as this kernel has not good battery life on my phone.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Stock XWLPI (with corresponding CF-Root kernel):

This ROM is very stable (ok, it's stock), but doesn't feel as smooth as XWLPD ROM.

The benchmark results are also very disappointing.

Maybe I re-do the benchmarks tomorrow.

Now let's have a look at its battery life.
[Galaxy S II General] jackrip5:
Well, you are a working beast!!;-) With all those test for which we are ask very thankful, don't forget to take pleasure on your nice phone sometimes :-) Nevertheless I'm very eager to see the performance and battery life of 4.0.4.

Thanks again for your engagement.

Gesendet von meinem GT-P1000 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
How ... surprise, surprise.

XWLPI's battery life in night use is very, very good.

XWLPI: Battery loss of 0,82% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%

Now I am curious about its mixed usage battery life.
[Galaxy S II General] jlevy73:
Always good to see your dedication to keeping this thread going. Thanks for sharing your results.
[Galaxy S II General] Gillion:
I concur.

Stock XWLPI rom +kernel battery life is VERY good. ( I did not root. I ran pure stock VNZ)

It deep sleeps perfectly.

Phenomenal kernel 5.5 Extreme also gave me a ridiculously excellent performance (after I rooted) but it was not as smooth as the XWLPI kernel.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Mixed usage battery life for stock XWLPI is also very good on my phone.

XWLPI: Battery loss of 1,86% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,4%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,67%

Only stock XWLPD has better battery life on my phone ... when you only look at stock ROMs.

I think that I will try it again with another modem (XXLPW), which performed a little bit better in my region for my mobile carrier.
[Galaxy S II General] a0007:
This thresd Of my favorite topics

Thanks for results

Can I use kernal XWLPI with another rom like JPLP9 ?

what's mean Quadrant Standard (best of 3 runs) ,

NenaMark2 (best of 3 runs) ,Vellamo (best of 2 runs) ,... etc and results it Depends on what
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I would not recommend to flash stock kernel x on stock ROM y.

Why?

If you want to flash a stock kernel, use the corresponding stock (or CF-Root) kernel.

best of 3 runs => best benchmark score/result of three benchmarks runs.

best of 2 runs => best benchmark score/result of two benchmarks runs.

Benchamrk results depend on many different things/influences (such as the kernel) ... and it also depends on the benchmark itself.

Some benchmarks only test a special part of the firmware/system (OpenGL, Browser, CPU arithmetics, data excahnge rate of the internal sd card, etc.), while others test nearly all different things.
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Calm down you two:p

Respect It_ler and the thread:thumbup:

Great battery life for both of you:thumbup::)

You have a different set up, different apps, different usage etc and would more than likely have tweaked Dorimanx to your personal preference to suit you.

It_ler tests everything bone stock, as it comes with his set up etc.

No one will have the exact same results its virtually impossible.

Its a guide thats all, but don't underestimate the work that goes into his tests.

He does normally test again if results seem a "bit off" and has already posted the mixed results which turned out excellent:)

Cheers guys:beer::)

★NeatROM★ Goodies
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-test Dorimanx v8.13:

Good battery life in night use with auto-wifi option enabled.

Dorimanx v8.13 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1, auto-wifi): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 1,8%

Very good deep sleep ratio.

I think I'll keep this kernel for a while before flashing the next kernel ...

Some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] ciprigeorgiu:
I tested Dorimanx v8.13 and compared one day usage with Philz kernel on Neat Rom 4.6.1. On both days i had the same schedule and i tried to have the same usage. 11 hours uptime, 2:40 screen on time, 30 minutes talk time, 10 min youtube, 10 minutes gaming. On Philz I ended up with 63% and on Dorimanx I had 66%. This is a small difference but on DOrimanx i have quite some lag (in opening camera, starting video recording and even in the games) while on Philz everything is much smoother so I am not going to sacrifice user experience for 6-7% on a full charge. Only wanted to share my experience.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks for sharing your experiences !

I just flashed Jeboo v2.1 on my phone ... even on first boot, it feels smoother compared to Dorimanx v8.13.

So I can confirm your observations.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Jeboo v2.1:

I just flashed Jeboo v2.1 (TWRP version) on my XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1.

It is very stable and very smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine (wifi, bluetooth, GPS, Gallery, live thmbnails in Video Player, camera, video recording, custom boot animation, etc.).

And a very nice TWRP recovery.

First Antutu result: 9821.
[Galaxy S II General] SPBoss:
I prefer touch recovery to twrp, maybe I'm old school:p

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
TWRP recovery is also touch recovery.

I like it, but I am also satified with PhilZ touch CWM recovery.

TWRP recovery can not handle nandroid backups created in CWM recovery ... so that's a disadvantage, as I have many CWM recovery nandroid backups.

But you can create TWRP nandroid backups ... and you can also select what to include (such as preload partiton).

Good that we have the choice :victory:
[Galaxy S II General] parag1dubey:
Hi k man, do you see any difference between jeboo and philz or should they give similar results because both are based on stock kernel?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
What do you mean?

Difference in performance or battery life?

For battery life, check my test results in first post.

On my phone, there is a difference between Jeboo and PhilZ kernel.

Jeboo is based on last sources released by Samsung (should be from XWLSD), and PhilZ kernel is based on the corresponding stock kernel ... so XWLSN based PhilZ kernel is newer.

For performance ... it's difficult to say, as my subjective feeling of both kernels always was that they are both very smooth.

P.S.:

PhilZ kernel is stock kernel with extended CWM touch recovery (and fixed version with a changed intramfs), and Jeboo is a custom kernel based on latest sources of a stock kernel (also with the same intramfs AFAIK).

So they are similar but not both stock kernels IMO.
[Galaxy S II General] parag1dubey:
Thanks. I meant performance wise. Scrolling smoothness etc. But you already answered. So thanks :)
[Galaxy S II General] SPBoss:
From personal experience when flashing a kernel it takes a few cycles to settle down and be at optimum performance :) just thought I would share that with you guys.

Some people flash a kernel and change after 5 minutes because they don't like the performance. Give the kernel a chance guys :p

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] ciprigeorgiu:
After first boot on dorimanx lag was quite bad. After a few reboot it ran better but still not as smooth as philz. i was on dorinmax for 24 hours so i think a gave it a chance.
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
my battery test

my night use

2g all time, greenify maps , sync on (all) , whats app , gmail and etc

kernel is v5 GM kernel by Kernel update 2.6 with mali patched , no UV default configs

ROM ; Jellybam 4.2.2 7.4 version
[Galaxy S II General] bogdan1980:
Dorimanx has huge options in stweaks that need to be activated at every boot, that's why you need to let it rest 4-5 minutes after every boot, then it's super smooth.

If i put dorimanx now, restart, and at homescreen i scroll, i get lag, because of what i say earlier. You need to know your kernel.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
+1

That's why I stated my experience about kernel's performance/smoothness after several restarts and after some time running on my phone.

Overal I had Dorimanx for about two days on my phone ... and I like it.

+1

I had the same "feeling" on my phone.

+1

Correct. In this case, Dorimanx is "special". So many configurable settings.

Yes, they take some time to be set correctly. As I know about this, I compared the smoothness (scrolling on "big" internet and xda-app pages, switching homescreens with many widgets, etc.) on an already up and running system.

Each kernel has it's advantages and disadvantages. Sometimes a kernel performs very good with one ROM, but bad with another.

On my phone, Dorimanx was smooth, but not as smooth as Jeboo and stock/PhilZ kernel on my ROM ... but it had very good battery life in mixed usage.

As I said before, I like Dorimanx.

IMO, no discussion about this kernel is "good" or "bad" is needed/indended, as long as we only share our experiences.

Everyone should test interesting kernels and decide, which one he/she likes most/fits best his/her needs.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Jeboo v2.1:

Bad battery life in nigt use on first run.

Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,67% per hour, Awake: 2,0%

As the same kernel had significantly better battery life on XWLSD NeatROM Lite, I will re-do the test.

And I received some messages (SMS) during the night - so that influenced the result.

Yes, I can see a massive (wifi?!) alarm (wakeup from deep sleep in the middle of the night) when I received the messages ... will upload some screenshots soon.

EDIT:

Added some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Jeboo v2.1:

Moderate battery life in mixed usage.

Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 23,3%, Awake: 12,7%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,36%

It's nearly the same battery life as for same kernel on XWLSD NeatROM Lite.

So it seems to be very smooth on my phone, but has not the best battery life.

Anyway, i will repeat the over-night battery test before flashing another kernel.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-test Jeboo v2.1:

Slightly worse battery life on second run in night use.

Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,72% per hour, Awake: 1,6%

Although deep sleep ratio was better.

So Jeboo has not best battery life on my phone, but it's very smooth.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SiyahKernel v6.0b5:

I just flashed SiyahKernel v6.0b5 on my XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1.

It is very stable and smooth on my phone. (Maybe slightly less smooth than Jeboo but feels a little bit smoother than Dorimanx.)

Everything works fine (GPS, wifi, bluetooth, custom boot animation, camera, video recording, Gallery, live thumbnails in Video Player, full TriangleAway support, etc.).

Now I can remember why there are still many users running on this kernel ... although the developer is very busy and has not much time to keep it up-to-date.

First AnTuTu result is: Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9252

But phone is still charging (and quite warm).

EDIT:

Second run on AnTuTu: 9962.
[Galaxy S II General] alen1901:
I also have more battery cosuming with jeboo kernel but screw it, phone flies. :p and i see your battery jumped up while in deep sleep, not calibrated. :p

Sent from SpeedMachine i9100
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
Kernel GM v 5 mali patched

my second battery test, jellybam 4.2.2 ,

data on all time, no wifi , whats app, gmail,facebook messenger and sync on ,

greenified Maps and Facebook
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SiyahKernel v6.0b5:

Bad battery life in night use.

Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 4,7%

Something started wifi during the night and kept it running the whole time.

Have to repeat the test ... maybe with pegasusq as CPU governor. This had better battery life on my phone last time I tested SiyahKernel.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] parag1dubey:
Thank you for sharing but in case you didn't notice, this thread is for sammy roms only.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-test SiyahKernel v6.0b5:

Moderate battery life on second run in night use.

Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1, pegasusq): Battery loss of 0,71% per hour, Awake: 5,0%

Oh, there was a calendar alarm during the night.

Sorry, I have to repeat this test again.
[Galaxy S II General] Kai Disobey:
Dorimanx 8.14 + 9.14 out now, description is very Battery friendly !!!

So take a look at this Link:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=40346653&postcount=23384
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Sure.

Already downloaded.

Let me just finish the current tests with Siyah.