yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I'm running on default settings.

Differences for changed scheduler and governor were small for my very light usage.

Maybe you will experience more differences with a "heavier"usage.

My tapatalk signature:

Phone:

SGS2 (GT-I9100)

ROM:

XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1 (PDA: XWMS1 / PHONE: XXMS4 / CSC: NEELS1)

Kernel:

Apolo v4.12 (regular)

If you have any question about or any issue with your SGS2, just ask in the New members friendly Q&A thread.

Have a :eek: at my latest kernel test results.
[Galaxy S II General] insaf_mohd:
So what gives you the best feeling among the below (in terms of more battery tweaking, i don't mind anything else? :P)

Apolo v4.11 (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1):

Apolo v4.12 (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1):

I am on NR lite 5.3.1 with Apolo v4.11 regular, about to flash new Apolo v4.12 regular....your advise would be great :)

BTW, being noob on Apolo what's the difference between Apolo regular, light, extreme 0,1,2 series?? Which is best for highest battery saving (without having the knowledge of Apolo configuration tweaking, just a flash-n-go )

Thanks in advance.:angel:
[Galaxy S II General] schubeir:
View attachment 2377660

STOCK XWLST unrooted Antutu score -- why do i need anything else?

heh heh

schubeir
[Galaxy S II General] AllSeeyinEye:
No more S2 testing for me. My boss supplied me with an S4! Tnx, It_ler, for all of your 'work'! Perhaps we'll meet again (I'm enjoying your highways on a regular basis, it always feels good to be in Germany! )
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
My battery tests for Apolo v4.12 are not finished yet.

Have to do them at home = same location as for the other battery tests to have the same condition.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
You're welcome ... in my thread and on the German highways :D:highfive:

Good luck with your new device and enjoy it :good:
[Galaxy S II General] insaf_mohd:
Thanks mate, we'd wait for the results in the OP!!

and wbt my second que?:laugh:

BTW, being noob on Apolo what's the difference between Apolo regular, light, extreme 0,1,2 series?? Which is best for highest battery saving (without having the knowledge of Apolo configuration tweaking, just a flash-n-go )

What can I try the greediest??
[Galaxy S II General] Many40:
Mate, just read post no 1 on Apolo kernel thread under "Undervolting" headline.

There are differences described.

Generaly - deeper UV -> more battery saving but also less phone's stability.

Each phone is different and can stand different UV - so commonly known xda rule is: backup, test and use what is best for your phone.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Apolo v4.12 (regular):

First battery test in a daily idle use.

Apolo v4.12 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1): Battery loss of 0,40% per hour, Awake: 1,2%

Although it is similar to the "normal" night use, it was during the day ... and so not under the same conditions as the other "night use" battery tests.

And I will repeat it under "normal" conditions.

Here is a screenshot of BBS stats for this idle run:
[Galaxy S II General] hawkdown77:
For me... the best is apolo 4.12 v0 extreme sio/Zzmoove.

Im using stock rom 4.1.2
[Galaxy S II General] Cr@zyHeo:
Nice battery result. What apps you used with that result? Can you share your zzmoove gov config?
[Galaxy S II General] hawkdown77:
I just only use greenify in some apps that i dont use so much. Wifi/3g always on / Sync disable.

My gov zzmoove is default settings.

I jus use default sio/Zzmoove.

I choose setcpu too. I put min 200mhz and max 1 ghz.
[Galaxy S II General] Roz3buD:
Why do you use another app to set min/max CPU ? You can already do it in the apolo configurator app :)
[Galaxy S II General] hawkdown77:
In apollo i can not set min. Only max
[Galaxy S II General] egps2:
Min frequency is 200 MHz by default anyway. Do you often need to change it?
[Galaxy S II General] hawkdown77:
Yes....when charging and screen off i put 500-800
[Galaxy S II General] la_malacoda:
Hey :) these are my results with Apolo 4.12 Extreme v.2 and the official 2000 mAh battery from Samsung

I'm using noop/Neox and Facebook, Tumblr, Tapatalk, a lot of Whatsapp and Spotify and some games sometimes.

Sorry for my bad english :o
[Galaxy S II General] kelvinjasonpaul:
HELP bootloop

help!

I flashed a custom rom XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.3.1 (4.1.2)

then reboot.. it is successful!

then after, I flashed kernel Apolo v4.12 (regular)

and it is successful.

and then, I've decided to format my sdcard0 because of many empty folders.

So, I did the procedure:

setting>backup & restore>format usb>delete all

after that, it is stock in android logo.

10mins passed away and its the same.

then i tried to go to recovery then wipe cache, wipe dalvik. but still bootloop.

what should I do? :(

sorry for my english.
[Galaxy S II General] Many40:
Reflash Neatrom and later the kernel but don't format usb storage again.

BTW it's not a proper thread for this kind of issues.
[Galaxy S II General] K-a-M-u-Z-u:
Could you please share your settings? I could not find a good battery / performence combination with NeoX.(compared to zzmoove).

too much parameters and there is no info about them anywhere.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Apolo v4.12 (regular):

Fantastic battery life in mixed usage.

Apolo v4.12 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1): Battery loss of 1,11% per hour, Wifi: 9,9%, Awake: 10,8%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,00%

It's nearly the same battery life as for previous kernel versions ... and very good.

In night use (when idle), stock kernel has similar battery life on my phone, but with about 10% of screen on time ratio in mixed usage, Apolo kernel is significantly better than stock kernel.

I think that I will stay for a while on this kernel ... till I get bored and want to test another kernel ... won't take long ... I guess ;)

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] Emre9110:
Apolo v4.11 Extreme v0

Apolo v4.12 Extreme v0
[Galaxy S II General] hawkdown77:
2000mah battery?
[Galaxy S II General] Emre9110:
If you talking about me, no it is 1650 mah stock battery.

-With NeatRom v5.3.1 Jb Reloaded themed,

-network: 2g,

-always mobile data on,

-Sometimes wifi( you can see above)

-ondemand-cfq

-200 mhz (825mv)-500 mhz (950 mv)-800 mhz (975 mv)- 1000 mhz (1075 mv)-1200 mhz(1200 mv),

-leds to 1 second led's brightness to 5,

-fast dormancy off,

-bln off, slide to wake off,

-greenified facebook falcon pro instagram foursquare except whatsapp,

-sync off,

-crt on, animation scala x1

-screen brightness %50 as you can see above :)
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Where is my post?

Ok, re-write the whole text again ... and hope it will be saved this time :crying:

XWMS1 NeatROM v5.4 Aroma:

I have just flashed the new XWMS1 NeatROM v5.4 Aroma on my phone.

Selected similar mods, apps, etc. like on Lite version.

It is very stable and smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine (custom boot animation, wifi, bluetooth, GPS, camera, video recording, custom status bar color, custom clock in status bar, multi window, 23-toggles, etc.).

As I have not much time, I started directly with the battery tests ... so the battery stats chip maybe was not settled down properly.

So I will repeat the battery test next weekend.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
XWMS1 NeatROM v5.4 Aroma:

Moderate battery life in night use.

NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4): Battery loss of 0,59% per hour, Awake: 1,8%

It's significantly worse than for v5.1 (which is also based on the same stock ROM XWMS1).

So there is something wrong/different with my current settings/apps ... or the battery stats chip really was not settled down correctly.

Oh, I see that the NeatROM Update app was running and causing some alarms. I have now disabled to check for updates at startup and set the interval to 24 hours.

Hopefully that can help to reduce this alarms.

Here are some screenshots - can not attach all screenshots currently ... issues while uploading :confused: ... now it worked:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
XWMS1 NeatROM v5.4 Aroma:

Even worse battery life in mixed usage.

NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4): Battery loss of 1,93% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,6%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,74%

But the alarms for NeatROM Update app were not increased ... so the settings seems to work fine :fingers-crossed:

As the battery life is that different from the "normal" battery life on XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1, I really suspect the battery stats chip as main cause for this.

System, Partial Wakelocks and Alarms in BBS do not show any other main culprit.

So I have to repeat both battery tests next weekend.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
XWMS1 NeatROM v5.4.2 Aroma:

I just flashed latest NeatROM v5.4.2 with Lite settings on my phone.

It is very stable and smooth and everything works fine (wifi, bluetooth, GPS, camera, multi-window, custom statusbar color, custom clock in statusbar, custom boot animation, etc.).

I have flashed the Blue Theme v5 + Many40 mod for Blue Theme v5.

I like it very much.

Just two minor things that I have recognized now:

1. I can not install persistent file for Avast AntiTheft app in system partition (although I have about 150 MB free space in system).

It was installed successfully with root features > on system partition.

So it's not critical, but on previous ROM version I could install the persistent file.

Maybe I have to uninstall and then reinstall the AntiTheft app.

2. The stock EMail app produces a lot of alarms (although I have set the sync interval of all my mail accounts to never.)

That I have already experienced on v5.4, but not on v5.1.

I'm quite sure that I have the same settings like before.

Have checked all sync options again and rebooted. Will check it on next battery cycle.

If it still generates that much alarms, I may have to clear EMail app data and reconfigure my mail accounts.

ATM I think that both issues are not caused by the ROM itself ... maybe some strange settings or it's because of my non-wipe installation.

But I don't like to wipe data.
[Galaxy S II General] _Sale_:
Thank you buddy for your feedback. Really appreciate everything you do for us

Sent from my NeatRom'ed GT-I9300 wifi hotspoting from my NeatRom'ed GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] championc:
Hi It_ler

Can you please confirm again what apps you Force Stop in Settings > Application Manager > All.

I remember you did screen shots msny many pages of posts ago but I cannot find the post anymore.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Have a look here.

I have added the link to the FAQs in post #2.
[Galaxy S II General] sushantt:
Plzzzz suggest... Me best rom(stable) and kernel for better battery.... Thinking of neat rom lite latest
[Galaxy S II General] evillive:
Is there any chance to see testing results on the NeatROM_Lite_v5.4.2_Aroma with Apolo regular JB 4.12 kernel in the future?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, I plan to do proper battery tests on PhilZ kernel first.

Then I will check other kernels ... latest Apolo is on the top of my kernels-to-test list.

My tapatalk signature:

Phone:

SGS2 (GT-I9100)

ROM:

XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2 (PDA: XWMS1 / PHONE: XXMS4 / CSC: NEELS1)

Kernel:

PhilZ v5.15.9

If you have any question about or any issue with your SGS2, just ask in the New members friendly Q&A thread.

Have a :eek: at my latest kernel test results.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
XWMS1 NeatROM v5.4.2 Aroma:

Absolute fantastic battery life in night use.

NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4.2): Battery loss of 0,24% per hour, Awake: 1,2%

Unbelievable ... best battery life during idle/standby time I've ever had on my phone :good:

Here is a screenshot of the corresponding BBS view:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
XWMS1 NeatROM v5.4.2 Aroma:

Now the other side of the medal - moderate battery life in mixed usage.

NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4.2): Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 8,7%, Awake: 9,7%, Screen: 8,6% => loss*(1-screen): 1,26%

Although the battery life in night use was that excellent, the overall battery life in mixed usage (with only about 8,6% screen on) was "only" in the middle range of all tested NeatROM version.

It's Ok ... but at least for me a little bit disappointing.

Maybe it's really the significantly higher battery consumption with wifi on and running.

I will soon compare it with my battery test results on Apolo kernel.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I just flashed Apolo v4.12 on my XWMS1 NeatROM v5.4.2 Aroma.

It's very stable and smooth.

Everything seems to work fine ... but the USB debugging is again enabled after rebooting.

Unfortunately the "trick", which worked on stock/PhilZ kernel with the customboot.sh file in system/bin, does not work on Apolo kernel.

Strange ...

My tapatalk signature:

Phone:

SGS2 (GT-I9100)

ROM:

XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2 (PDA: XWMS1 / PHONE: XXMS4 / CSC: NEELS1)

Kernel:

Apolo v4.12 (Regular)

If you have any question about or any issue with your SGS2, just ask in the New members friendly Q&A thread.

Have a :eek: at my latest kernel test results.
[Galaxy S II General] _Sale_:
Hey buddy delete adb in etc/postboot

Sent from my NeatRom'ed GT-I9300 wifi hotspoting from my NeatRom'ed GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Thanks for the clue :good:

But it's postbootinit file in "system/bin/" folder ;)

Now it works like I want it ... USB debugging disabled (and by default MTP mode).
[Galaxy S II General] _Sale_:
Opsss, my bad :)

Sent from my NeatRom'ed GT-I9300 wifi hotspoting from my NeatRom'ed GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Without your hint I would still be searching for the right file :cyclops:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Apolo v4.12 (Regular):

Good battery life in night use.

Apolo v4.12 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 0,51% per hour, Awake: 1,7%

It's significantly worse than on stock/PhilZ kernel, but I had PhilZ kernel longer on my phone before running battery test.

So I will repeat the test on the second battery cycle for Apolo kernel ... just to be fair.

EDIT:

Added screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Apolo v4.12 (Regular):

Fantastic battery life in mixed usage.

Apolo v4.12 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 1,08% per hour, Wifi: 9,1%, Awake: 10,2%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 0,98%

That's great ... especially after the battery loss in night use, which was OK, but not as good as in other tests.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Retest Apolo v4.12 (Regular):

Better battery life on second battery cycle.

Apolo v4.12 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 0,43% per hour, Awake: 1,5%

Now it's nearly the same as for previous tests on Apolo kernel.

MediaScanner pushed the Awake ratio up to 1,5% ... otherwise the battery life would have been even better.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Re-retest Apolo v4.12 (Regular):

Slightly better battery life on third battery cycle in night use.

Apolo v4.12 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 0,41% per hour, Awake: 1,0%

Seems to be stable now. Same as for Apolo kernel on previous XWMS1 NeatROM Lite ... but a little bit worse than my best result on stock/PhilZ kernel on the same ROM.

So on my phone, stock/PhilZ XWMS1 kernel has better battery life in night use/ when idle, but Apolo kernel has better battery life in mixed usage.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Apolo v4.12 (Regular):

Nice result on AnTuTu: Apolo v4.12 (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): 10990

It's the highest result I had so far on my phone :good:

So the smoothness is not only placebo ;)
[Galaxy S II General] K-a-M-u-Z-u:
Im using apolo 4.12 extreme v1.(v2 gave me freeze sometimes).stock settings.great performance.no freeze.and good battery life on a daily use.

Perhaps you would test it?
[Galaxy S II General] Fülesbagoly:
There will be NeatROM Aroma Lite v5.5 test?

Do you plan to XWMS1 NeatROM Aroma Lite v5.5 (4.1.2) testing?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Extreme versions are not stable on my phone.

So I can't test it ... unfortunately.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Maybe ... but not very soon, as I am extremely happy ATM with my current system :D

But I am sure that soon or later (maybe in a few days) I get bored and tempted to flash something new ;)
[Galaxy S II General] -Grift-:
For the LOLs,

NeatROM 5.4.2

Apolo 4.1.2 Regular

Battery loss: 0.5%/h

Deep sleep: 96%

Awake: 4%

Screen on: 1.8%

:silly:

LIKE A BOSS DEEPSLEEP

:silly:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Fantastic ... more than 7 days with nearly 3 hours screen on time :good:

Now I'm jealous ;)
[Galaxy S II General] Many40:
HI,

That's amazing mate :good:

However instead of braging about that better write a guide how to achieve that results for benefit other xda members :p;)
[Galaxy S II General] -Grift-:
Uh don't use the phone :laugh: aside from the basic phone functions and whatsapp the rest I used my Nexus 7 and PC to accomplish :laugh:
[Galaxy S II General] Vivek_Neel:
is this the best result am seeing so far?

Or anything is still better than this?

Amazing and congrats mate.

Btw Thanks for the tips.:P
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Good instructions ... I already have a PC. Now I only need a Nexus 7 ;)
[Galaxy S II General] shadynit:
its amazing ..

do you know about the apolo light kernel result?
[Galaxy S II General] -Grift-:
Regular. No... the official 2000 Mah :p Surprising the mere 250Mah makes quite a big difference and the phone feels cooler when operating under similar loads.. Also the 2000Mah battery is Made in Korea while my original 1650 Mah one was Made in Vietnam if im not wrong.. IMHO Korea makes better quality batteries...
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Apolo v4.13 (Regular):

I just flashed Apolo v4.13 (Regular) with English CWM recovery on my NeatROM v5.4.2 Aroma ROM.

It's very stable and very smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine.

EDIT:

First result in AnTuTu directly after flashing: Apolo v4.13 (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): 10915
[Galaxy S II General] 10xavix10:
Pedestre has really done a great work! These results are amazing!
[Galaxy S II General] j1gga84:
[MENTION=4229457]It_ler[/MENTION]

4.13 got an update by pedestre because there was an error left (something with wifi)

Just for info :)

Regards

Sent from my GT-I9100 using german Tapatalk 4
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, I have already downloaded the fixed version.

As it was only for the wifi tethering (which I am not using ATM), I will finish my running battery tests first and then flash the fixed kernel version.

But thanks for the information anyway :highfive:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Apolo v4.13 (Regular):

Good battery life in night use.

Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 0,45% per hour, Awake: 1,4%

It's a little bit worse than the best result for the previous kernel version. But with better deep sleep ratio, the battery life would have been nearly the same.

Maybe I repeat the battery test with the (wifi tethering) fixed v4.13 - but I except no significant difference as wifi is turned off during deep sleep anyway.

EDIT:

Added a screenshot:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Apolo v4.13 (Regular):

Good battery life in mixed usage too.

Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 1,23% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,11%

But it's worse than on previous kernel versions.

So I will flash the (wifi tethering) fixed version and repeat the battery tests.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Fixed Apolo v4.13 (Regular):

I just flashed the fixed Apolo v4.13 on my phone.

Now the wifi tethering works fine too.

First result in AnTuTu: Apolo v4.13 (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): 10983
[Galaxy S II General] txx3:
[MENTION=4229457]It_ler[/MENTION] deep sleep is better, but rest is worse?...well i use my phone all the time deep sleep is secondary to my....would you still say i should go from 4.12 to 4.13??

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
You can try it ... maybe the battery life is different on your phone.

I will do a second battery test cycle ... then let's see.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Retest Apolo v4.13 (Regular):

Excellent battery life on second battery cycle in night use.

Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 0,35% per hour, Awake: 1,1%

With a deep sleep ratio of about 98,9% it has now similar battery life as on the best run for stock/PhilZ kernel in night use = when idle.

Maybe its battery life in mixed use will be better too ...

EDIT:

Added a screenshot:
[Galaxy S II General] marcusmt:
no more updates for SII? andoid 4.3 ou KK ? TW roms

I bought a Galaxy Note 3, but I really like my S2, use both
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Official statement from Samsung is that there will be no further upgrade of the firmware for the GT-I9100 :(

Android 4.1.2 is the last / final version we have received as official / stock ROM for our S2.

I don't want to "guess" about the reasons behind it ... but we will have to flash a custom ROM to get an Android version > 4.1.2.

I'm following OMNI ROM threads ... maybe ... sometime ... I will flash it.

But for now, I'm still happy with my current system.
[Galaxy S II General] sushantt:
Plz suggest me best rom and kernel
[Galaxy S II General] Vivek_Neel:
Neat rom v5.5 with hirox 5.8 medium.

And settle for life.:)
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I am sure that you have to find the best combination for your and your phone yourself.

The same system that fits perfect to my needs, may not be your "best" ROM and kernel.

Get inspired by my test results to flash and test a good combination on your phone ... and check, if it is also good for you.

I am happy ATM with Apolo v4.13 on NeatROM v5.4.2.
[Galaxy S II General] cartagena:
second test in mixed use..?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, I'm trying to do a second mixed usage battery test ... but it's hard to achieve the same conditions like in the other tests, as I receive more messages (SMS, emails, etc.) during Christmas time.

So I had to abort the battery test twice :confused:

But as soon as I get "normal" conditions during the whole 20-21 hours, I will post the battery test results.

My tapatalk signature:

Phone:

SGS2 (GT-I9100)

ROM:

XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2 (PDA: XWMS1 / PHONE: XXMS4 / CSC: NEELS1)

Kernel:

Apolo v4.13 (Regular)

If you have any question about or any issue with your SGS2, just ask in the New members friendly Q&A thread.

Have a :eek: at my latest kernel test results.
[Galaxy S II General] OGroteKoning:
[MENTION=4229457]It_ler[/MENTION] Thank you for all the info and work you have done here. Our usage is similar and you have helped me to get the best kernel for my setup time and again. Now get a Nexus 5 to help there too ;)
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Oh ... it's you.

I could just remember your old avatar ;)

But this one is now "political correct" :good:

A friend of mine also has the Nexus 5 ... nice phone.

I hope that you will have a lot of fun with it :fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S II General] OGroteKoning:
Hehehe, yeah. I rapped over the knuckles by the mods for my old avatar. :D

I'm already having fun mate, but deep inside it feels strange not holding the arguably best cellphone ever made in my hands...
[Galaxy S II General] Fülesbagoly:
MS2 NeatROM v5.6 Aroma test

Will be MS2 NeatROM v5.6 Aroma tests?

Thank you for your response and Happy New Year!
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I have already downloaded it. But still thinking about it.

I'm happy with my current system ATM ... but sooner or later I will flash a new ROM version.

Maybe sooner ;)

My tapatalk signature:

Phone:

SGS2 (GT-I9100)

ROM:

XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2 (PDA: XWMS1 / PHONE: XXMS4 / CSC: NEELS1)

Kernel:

Apolo v4.13 (Regular)

If you have any question about or any issue with your SGS2, just ask in the New members friendly Q&A thread.

Have a :eek: at my latest kernel test results.
[Galaxy S II General] Fülesbagoly:
Battery time the MS2 NeatROM v5.6 Aroma is better than the MS1 NeatROM v5.5 Aroma or the MS1 NeatROM v5.4.2 Aroma.

I think it is worth trying.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I am considering to flash the XWMS2 based NeatROM v5.6 ... but not today.