yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II General] a1adin:
Hi It_ler,

according to bbs, I have com.android.providers.calendar alarms wakeup:38 for 7-8 hour use.

this is my highest on the alarms list.

is this normal? :confused:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
No, I have got 1 wakeup of this in about 6 hours of usage.

And I once had 0 wakeups of this in about 14,5 hours during the night.

And usually I have 3 wakeups of this in about 10-11 hours during the night.

(Just checked some of my "old" BBS dumps.)

So check your calendar settings and try to disable all alarms in your calendar entries.

Have you got a calendar widget? Or another app/widget checking your calendar entries?

Maybe this is causing the wakeups.
[Galaxy S II General] a1adin:
I do not use alarms on all my calendar entries.

And I have disable auto update.

Yes I use calendar widget but no auto update only manual.

I do not know other apps which check my calendar.

How do you know about it?

Now I use "touch calendar" app, before that I used the stock one (s planer).

But I always have that high count of calendar alarms wakeup.

What calendar app do you use?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Only stock SPlanner app and CalWidget from Play store as calendar widget.

Are you using the Alarm feature of your clock?

Maybe it's when an alarm is set to wake you up in the morning?!
[Galaxy S II General] j1gga84:
Dorimanx 8/9.34 is out (v. 8.xx is much more stable for me than 9.xx) and PhilZ v5.07.0 ;)

Regards
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, already downloaded both new kernel versions.

Maybe I will first check my battery life on stock / PhilZ kernel before testing Dorimanx kernel.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ v5.07.0:

I just flashed PhilZ-touch kernel v5.07.0 on my XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8.

It is rock stable and very smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine (as before on previous kernel versions).

First result in AnTuTu directly after flashing the kernel: PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 8686

EDIT: Second run in AnTuTu: PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9181

Now preparing battery tests.
[Galaxy S II General] travellinground:
I just started doing this whole ROM/kernal shenanignas but I was wondering have you tested using different modems as well to improve battery life?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
No, I'm running on the ROM's default modem.

There are some modem threads ... look here or here.

Last one is still open. So ask your question there ... or test the different modems yourself and report back your results.

EDT: Here is another one fpr modem + RIL files.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ v5.07.0:

Unbelievable battery life in night use.

PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,28% per hour, Awake: 1,3%

This is a new record on my phone.

Battery loss was only 4% in more than 14 hours ... fantastic.

EDIT:

Added a screenshot (Other stats in BBS app):
[Galaxy S II General] pedestre:
It's really incredible ¡¡ 4% in 14 hours, guauu
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Yes, I had to check it twice ... in BBS app and stats.

Will add a screenshot "as a proof", as soon as my running mixed usage battery test is finished.

BTW, the battery life in mixed usage seems to be a little bit worse. Maybe stock/PhilZ kernel is only so good for standby/idle.

Let's wait till my tests are finished and I have all the numbers.
[Galaxy S II General] slybunda:
will philz kernel work with cyanogen mod 10.1 rom?
[Galaxy S II General] parag1dubey:
No. Its the stock kernel for Samsung roms.
[Galaxy S II General] slybunda:
u are about that? i dont think philz kernel is the stock one that samsung uses in thier roms man.
[Galaxy S II General] j1gga84:
Samsung (stock) based Custom ROMs and Samsung stock ROMs only! No Cyanogen Mod ROMs etc!

[MENTION=4229457]It_ler[/MENTION]

will you do a second (and maybe third) test cycle for PhilZ Kernel as for Apolo? Maybe 2nd run will give better results ;)

Regards
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
For sure ... yes, I will repeat the battery test on PhilZ kernel.

I want to see if it was only an "exception" or if I am able to reproduce this excellent battery life in night use.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
As you can read in the first post of PhilZ kernel thread:

Pure stock kernel (only ramdisk changes)​

So, you can say it's stock kernel with some changes for the recovery (and to fix bootloops).

Anyway, it only works on stock or stock-based ROMs.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ v5.07.0:

Very good battery life in mixed usage too.

PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,17% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,05%

It's only a little bit worse than for Apolo v4.8b light.

As its battery life in night use was significantly better compared to other kernels and even other versions of the same kernel, I will repeat the battery test to verify the results.

BTW, AnTuTu result after the battery tests: PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9348

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] pedestre:
It's an amazing result for a stock kernel. Maybe samsung is improving the kernel but not sharing with us? No updates in open source from Samsung since months
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
This or I have a "drift" of my system to better battery results :confused:

As I don't think that my system is drifting to better battery life, your suggestion may be true.

Good that stock kernel seems to get better, but bad that there are no updates for the sources yet.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Retest PhilZ v5.07.0:

Slightly worse battery life in second run for night use.

PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,34% per hour, Awake: 1,3%

But still very, very good result ... for stock / PhilZ kernel.

This time -5% battery in about 14h 35m.

EDIT:

Added a screenshot - directly after setting the custom reference in BBS, the battery level turned from 83% to 82%, so I calculated the numbers based on 82% and not on 83% as BBS:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Retest PhilZ v5.07.0:

Excellent battery life in mixed usage on second run.

PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,19% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,2%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,07%

It's only slightly worse than on first run.

So my system is still "stable" and I can reproduce the fantastic results for this stock/PhilZ kernel.

EDIT: Third run on AnTuTu: PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9421

(Although it looks like I have charged my phone during the battery test, I haven't attached neither the USB cable nor the charger. Maybe just chemistry?!)

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] gpkumaran:
But You`ve wifi on only for the 2 hrs that the screen was on right?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Correct. As stated in my stats.

I am using Better Wifi On/Off app from Play store to turn off wifi when phone is unplugged and screen is off.

Works like a charm ... and saves battery power on my phone.

P.S.:

Works better than the system's wifi policy IMO. And you can configure more (such as turning wifi on after screen is unlocked and turn wifi off when not connected to a WLAN).
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Last run in AnTuTu for PhilZ v5.07.0: PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9615

Created a nandroid backup and ...

SpeedMod K5-8:

I just flashed SpeedMod K5-8 kernel on my XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8.

It is very stable and very smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine (wifi, bluetooth, GPS, custom boot animation, gallery, live thumbnails in video player, camera, video recording, etc.).

I want to update its test results to be better comparable with other kernels.

First run in AnTuTu directly after flashing: 9887.
[Galaxy S II General] parag1dubey:
Kman, i hope you don't mind if I share my battery results on your thread with neatrom Lite 4.8 and philz latest kernel :p:)
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
No, you are welcome to shaare your experiences and battery results here :highfive:
[Galaxy S II General] olyloh6696:
7 hours 21 minutes screen on time?!

How is that possible?! So you'll say PhilZ kernel is the best for battery life?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SpeedMod K5-8:

Good battery life in night use.

SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 1,8%

Better than on previous ROM versions, but a little bit worse than for stock/PhilZ kernel.

Let's wait for its battery life in mixed usage test.

EDIT:

Added a screenshot:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Have a look here

I had more than 9,5 hours screen on time on XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0 with stock/PhilZ kernel.

If you do nothing ... just click the screen from time to time to keep it on, you may get a screen on time of about 10 hours with a stock battery IMO.

But that is not a "real" scenario. Just a testing variant.
[Galaxy S II General] j1gga84:
After Speedmod you will test Dorimanx 8/9.34 I guess? ;)

It would be interesting to see if there are any differences in battery life between v8 and v9

Regards
[Galaxy S II General] parag1dubey:
I agree with the op but in my case, the screen on time was achieved while using my phone as I normally use it.. Xda, calls, WhatsApp, ebook reading etc.. So my scenario wasn't in a test condition but in actual real world usage.. :)
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I try to prepare for next kernel tests.

XWLPM is getting "stable" on my phone => has nearly same results on different battery cycles.

So it could be my new base ROM.

EDIT:

Just saw new stock XWLPO ROM for Nordic regions.

Hmm ... maybe it is better to wait a little bit and check this version too, before deciding for a new base ROM?!
[Galaxy S II General] jackrip5:
There is a lot of rom activity at the moment, it will be difficult to stay on one rom precisely. 4.0.4 is a nice evolution of ics and i guess that every upcoming rom will have a little more finetuning.

I will give xwlpo a try.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Feel free to post your experiences here.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Stock XWLPO:

I just flashed stock XWLPO (Nordic regions) Android 4.0.4 ROM with Mobile Odon (Lite) app.

I cleared the CSC (Hidden and Cache), and changed Kernel to CF-Root v5.6 for XXLQ5.

Everything seems to work fine so far.

Some different system app versions compared to XWLPM and some other little games.

Rest looks very similar.

Will update OP with benchmark results as soon as my tests are fninshed.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
XWLPO:

My first impressions on this stock ROM ... very stable, smooth and very similar to XWLPM.

It has nearly the same benchmark results as XWLPM.

Everything if have tested works fine.

Now testing battery life.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
XWLPO:

It has excellent battery life in night use.

XWLPO: Battery loss of 0,76% per hour, Awake: 5,1%, Deep sleep: 94%

Now let's see its battery life in mixed usage.
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
hey, is this http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1292825

that same XWLPO firmware that you have used? or where i can download it?

that firmware beats Phenomenal in battery tests? thanks!
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I downloaded the stock XWLPO ROM from here => http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1602579 (link is also in my signature)

Or you can download it from here => http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1544487

Or use Check Fus Downloader from here => http://fus.nanzen.se/

and download it directly from Samsung servers.

And I don't think that its battery life is better than on Phenomenal.

Night use is kind of "stand-by" usage, i.e. screen off, phone tunred on in normal mode but unused, only wifi on.

So that's nothing special - you can compare it with a kind of base/ground battery consumption.

The more important result for battery life is in mixed usage.

That's my "normal"/everyday usage of the phone.

It's still "light", that's why the difference between undervolted and stock kernels are not that much.

Maybe I should change the sequence of the battery test results to make it more obvious that the mixed usage stats are the "main" ones.
[Galaxy S II General] j1gga84:
Will you only test Stock Kernels the next time?

A lot of Kernels were updated, like Siyah, N.E.A.K, DorimanX and the new Dream Kernel (works perfect on my S2 :) )

Regards
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
No, I just want to decide for a new base ROM.

That's why I extensively test latest stock ROM versions.

I don't want to switch to a new base ROM for custom kernel testings, and a few days later I find another stock ROM with even better performance and battery life. I don't want to switch the base ROM too often. Make the system and the test results less stable and comparable.

As soon as have chosen a new base ROM, I will continue to test latest custom kernels.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
XWLPO:

Battery life in mixed usage is OK, but not very good.

XWLPO: Battery loss of 2,00% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,0%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,79%

Does not beat battery life of XWLPD and is a little bit worse than XWLPM.

Maybe I will verify my results on a second battery cycle.
[Galaxy S II General] jlevy73:
Are you using cpu spy to determine deep sleep percentage?
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
So what firmware is best when i use it with Phenomenal kernel? if i want best battery life.. now i have UHLPS..
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
In my first test yes.

But now I am just using BBS. Chamonix has added this helpful feature some time ago, and since this time, I switch to "Other" and read the deepsleep ratio.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
On my phone, combination of XWLPD ROM and Phenomenal 5.5 Extreme had best performance/battery life balance.

Give it a try and report back your experiences.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
XWLPO:

Update for second battery cycle in night use.

XWLPO: Battery loss of 0,73% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%

Nearly the same result as in first run ... only slightly better.

Now the second run for mixed usage.
[Galaxy S II General] Vihru:
thanks, i try that! how i can see BBS that deep sleep? O_O and how about this

Cpu Spy - realgpp v0.5.18 beta --> http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1740622

Better version for CPU SPy.
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
How does Cm7,9 and 10 compare?
[Galaxy S II General] jackrip5:
I don't really feel a difference in daily use between lpm or lpo. Battery drain seems to be quite similar. But i have to say that I'm a light user just like u.

In question of stability, I'm experiencing some fc in some application that did not happen before. I will not be conclusive about this because it could be a one time situation. I'll keep that under control, but i did not sweep the system before upgrading so maybe there is some old settings which interfere. And i installed some games for the vacation time, maybe that changes something in term of stability.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
No idea, as I like Sammy ROMs and want to stay on stock ROMs.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
As I'm on stock (stock-based) ROMs, only v8.x will work on my phone.

Dorimanx v8.34 is on my kernels-to-test list.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
SpeedMod K5.8:

Very good battery life in mixed usage too.

SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,24% per hour, Wifi: 10,0%, Awake: 11,6%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,12%

It's nearly the same battery life as for same kernel on previous ROM.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
First I'm back on PhilZ v5.07.0.

After some re-tests, I plan to create a new nandroid backup and then test latest Dorimanx kernel.
[Galaxy S II General] olyloh6696:
Is PhilZ your primary kernel then? Would you say this is the kernel which gives you the best battery life?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
I have got no "primary" or "preferred" kernel ... always try to be "objective" :angel:

But to check results and verify if my system is still "stable" (no drift in battery life), I come back to stock/PhilZ kernel ... as kind of reference.

So it's more like a "base" kernel for the base ROM I am running currently.

And I try to compare all custom kernels with the stock one.

Hope that makes sense :cowboy:

EDIT:

I had the best battery life so far in mixed usage on my phone on Apolo v4.8b.

(In night use it was on stock/Philz v5.07.0.)
[Galaxy S II General] peron:
What is your brightness level?

It is an excellent result nonetheless.

I live in a sunny place and use the phone while outdoor. Brightness is at 100% very often and I have never seen more than two hours screen on time
[Galaxy S II General] Jeetu:
It depends on your usage. How you use your phone. If you are having heavy usage then 2 hrs is enough. Enjoy the usage of phone don't bother on battery. :thumbup:
[Galaxy S II General] umair42:
Temperature also affects battery life.High temperature drains battery quickly.
[Galaxy S II General] parag1dubey:
I keep brightness at minimum and increase it as required
[Galaxy S II General] Lartsch:
Dorimanx

Got the best results with Dorimanx v9.34! :)
[Galaxy S II General] kentandrei:
DELETE.
[Galaxy S II General] Emre9110:
New Philiz 5.08.5 out :)
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Just flashed PhilZ v5.08.5 on my XWLSW NeatROM v4.8.

It is very stable and very smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine so far.
[Galaxy S II General] championc:
Just a suggestion for many readers of this thread - everyone's usage is different and we all have apps which we just cannot do without, even if they show up as drainers.

I suggest that you charge your phone up to full until a set time at night and then check your battery in the morning and repeat over a few days wiith different roms.

I did this and Apollo Extreme V0 works well for me.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ v5.08.5:

Still no issues at all with this kernel.

First result in AnTuTu after flashing and charging for a while: 9316

Will repeat the test when phone is a "unstressed" and little bit colder.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ v5.08.5:

Good battery life in night use.

PhilZ v5.08.5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,50% per hour, Awake: 1,5%

It's a little bit worse than on my best run for v5.07.0, but I received a WhatsApp message during the night, which might have caused additional battery consumption.

So I will repeat the battery test ... hopefully without any messages during the night :fingers-crossed:

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ v5.08.5:

Excellent battery life in mixed usage.

PhilZ v5.08.5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,19% per hour, Wifi: 9,7%, Awake: 10,8%, Screen: 9,6% => loss*(1-screen): 1,08%

It's only slightly worse than on v5.07.0.

EDIT:

Third run on AnTuTu: PhilZ v5.08.5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9918

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] Emre9110:
Dori 8.35 out :)

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] bobdoblo:
Oh well, nevermind! :D

★NeatROM★ Mods + Battery Tips
[Galaxy S II General] alkspo:
it_ler words can't be said on how grateful i and probably the rest of the s2 are for you. everytime a new kernel pops up, you test and retest it for our sake. even when you find perfect kernel, you flash new one regardless for the community's sake.

i always referred to this thread but i now moved on to 4.2 and i realize i took this thread for granted

thanks a bunch keep it up :p
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Retest PhilZ v5.08.5:

Fantastic battery life in night use.

PhilZ v5.08.5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,34% per hour, Awake: 1,2%

It's only a little bit worse than my best result on previous kernel version.

EDIT:

Added a screenshot:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Retest PhilZ v5.08.5:

Even slightly better battery life in mixed usage.

PhilZ v5.08.5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,18% per hour, Wifi: 9,8%, Awake: 10,9%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,07%

Nearly the same as for v5.07.0 ... I'm happy with this.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] Astegal:
Hi! I would be more than happy if anyone could help me understand what is causing my battery to drain. Here is my log from bbs (unplugged and 4 hours in sleep mode)

http://db.tt/0zHKsTD3

I use stock I9100XWLSW with PhilZ 5.08.5 kernel

Thanks in advance for your help.

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9100 avec Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] kkm9139:
That should be on the bbs thread, they'd give you better answers than here (logically) but from what i know i can see you have the nlp wakelock which is caused by google sevices to give your location to google's apps like google maps for instance.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
1. BBS thread is the best place to post your dumpfile.

2. If your phone is rooted, check that Root option in Advanced and all stats in Dumpfile menu is TICKED.

3. I see "secril_fd-interface" wakelock. So try to change Fast Dormancy setting on your phone. You can use gokhanmoral's Fast Dormancy app from Plays store.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ v5.09.2:

I just flashed PhilZ-touch kernel v5.09.2 on my XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8.

It is very stable and smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine.

First result in AnTuTu (directly after flashing): PhilZ v5.09.2 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9761

EDIT: Second run in AnTuTu: PhilZ v5.09.2 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9824
[Galaxy S II General] NoRulesForMe:
It's LSY right? The 5.09.2? It can be flashed on LSW? Why???

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Phil3759 does not provide latest PhilZ kernel version for all ROM versions.

So he only created the latest PhilZ kernel version for the latest/newest stock ROM/kernel ... this seems to be XWLSY - not XWLSW.

But as the two version have nearly no difference in the kernel, XWLSY kernel will work fine on XWLSW ROM.

I can confirm this.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ v5.09.2:

Good battery life in night use.

PhilZ v5.09.2 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,48% per hour, Awake: 1,3%

But a little bit worse than for previous kernel versions ... maybe my battery stats chip needs to settle down a bit more.

I will repeat the battery test to verify my results.

EDIT:

Added a screenshot:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ v5.09.2:

Good battery life in mixed usage too.

PhilZ v5.09.2 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,34% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,3%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,20%

But it's worse than for previous kernel versions.

Either there is a difference between XWLSW and XWLSY stock kernel, or my system was not settle down properly.

I will repeat the battery tests to check this.

Here are some screenshots:
[Galaxy S II General] j1gga84:
XWLSY ?

I can't find any information about a newer firmware than XWLSW, also on german android forum !?

Thanks & regards
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Check on SamMobile.com for UK (T-Mobile) :eek:
[Galaxy S II General] umair42:
Is it better than XWLSW?
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
AFAIK ... there are no significant differences. That's why most ROM devs have not changed their ROM versions.
[Galaxy S II General] j1gga84:
the difference might be that LSY has a t-mobile uk branding and LSW not ;)

Regards
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
That's most likely :highfive:
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Retest PhilZ v5.09.2:

Slightly better battery life in night use.

PhilZ v5.09.2 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,46% per hour, Awake: 1,5%

But still worse than for previous kernel version.

Will check the last installed apps and if this is not the reason for the higher battery consumption, I will flash PhilZ v5.08.5 again to verifiy my last battery results.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
PhilZ v5.10.0:

Just flashed PhilZ v5.10.0 kernel on my XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8.

It is very stable and very smooth on my phone.

Everything works fine.

Will check my battery based on the latest stock / PhilZ kernel to verify my last results.

EDIT:

First run in AnTuTu directly after flashing the kernel: PhilZ v5.10.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9002
[Galaxy S II General] umair42:
Changelog for philz v5.10.0?Didn't find it in original thread.
[Galaxy S II General] It_ler:
Have a look at this thread instead.

In post #5 you will find the changelog.