yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] MoscowMaxim:
was 1.73 also here - worked like a charm from the first time... Thankz to the author!!!:D
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] unsp0ken:
Lucky you. I still haven't been able to get mine to re-unlock after a dozen or so tries.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] chinapaulo:
Great tutorial. I followed this starting with 1.73, and within an hour I was running Clean ROM 2.2 and loving it. Like many people, I did have to do the unlock more than once, but once it took, I was good to install CWM and then ROMs.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Sizzlincok:
ive been trying tp re-unlock for 2 hours now...still not taking it...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] nupe_1911:
I had this issue also. To fix it I turned off fastboot then shut the phone down (off). I then booted into the bootloader from being off, selected fastboot then used the cmd prompt to get the phone unlocked.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Sizzlincok:
how do you boot into bootloader with the phone totally off?

when i hold power+volume down the cap lights flash 6 times but i still just get into the actual rom
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Yze:
I had the exact same problem. I was on 1.82 rooted. Followed the steps and actually went all the way with unlocking my bootloader. I realized after that I wasn't supposed to unlock it yet because you cant get to RUU 1.85. So I went ahead and relocked it.. and now my phone is stuck in the KEEP TRYING thing people are talking about.

****RELOCKED**** is what i keep seeing.. still currently trying over and over again.

Maybe in the original guide, put it in bold black/red words saying do not unlock your bootloader until updating to 1.85 :)

I will update as soon as this damn thing finally unlocks my bootloader ;x

---------- Post added at 11:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:20 PM ----------

just wondering, when you finally got it to work, did it still say 0 KB sent?

---------- Post added at 11:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:28 PM ----------

i also have this issue. cannot get into bootloader from the phone being completely off either.

---------- Post added at 11:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:32 PM ----------

WOOHOO!!! Finally see it say

*** UNLOCKED ***

Just to update, I still saw the sending part in cmd say 0 KB.

All I can say is.. keep trying. It took me about 5-8 times.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Valitri:
So I had a pretty big scare. I followed the instructions. Currently I'm on my phone, it's rooted and I have the supersu app.

I tried to do the ruu upgrade to 1.85 from 1.73. I let it run for over an hour. The screen just stayed saying HTC with no progress bar. So I reset my phone praying, and sure enough my phones running now.

So where should I go now? I wanted to remove at&t apps and try cleanrom.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] mainecrab:
I have to ask what is the point of using the official update and having to relock and unlock it again? Is there not a flashable rom from the update itself? Seems like that is defeating the purpose or are there no roms available that are stock or near stock of unlocking and installing a recovery on the phone. Could you not unlock and install recovery then download rom factory reset flash rom and be on the new update?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] abhipati:
I am new to android. I have couple of questions hope anyone will clear them

I am struck at step 6 i.e Root your system

1. Connect your phone as a "Disk Drive" and drag the "root.zip" file in the "root" folder to your phone's memory

2. Reboot into recovery with the adb command (adb reboot recovery)

After this I getting the following message "I'm getting a message in red letters when going to recovery about this build being for development purposes only." is this normal ?

How much time does it take to get to the screen with CMWM

2) I have AT&T HTC ONE X currently I am in india, so my phone does not update to 1.85. I have already rooted and unboot my phone . I would be going back to US after 1 month. My question is should I re-block now it self or go to US re-block so that I can update to 85
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] stormz:
I think i've gotten the steps done to end up with the expected ending, so thanks for that.

Unfortunately some of the steps could be greatly improved to have helped the process.

You didn't say how to get the phone into Fastboot mode, therefore i had to google around the net to find out about holding the down volume/power button combo after shutting down the phone. (PITA, for such an easy addition that should be in your TUT).

Also, BusyBox would not work until the phone was rooted, so those last steps should be reversed.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] natetruong:
stuck at HTC logo

hi guys, i'm noob for a android, i switched from iphone to HOX at&t, and i really like it. Last night I tried to root, unlock bootloader, and flash custom ROM to my phone. The root part was easy, and unlock bootloader kinda tricky but I did it. After unlocked bootloader I tired to install twrp recovery to it, but i think my phone lost root, because I tried to use titanium to backup my apps but it said my phone doesnt have root, even though i saw the SU icon. I gave up since I was tired. This morning my I still could turn on my phone and work normally, then I went to bootloader mode and I saw the recovery, I wiped cache, cavilk, system, and factory reset, but when I tired to reboot system, it wouldn't work, so I had to volume down and power button to get to bootloader mode. I tried reboot in there but my phone stuck in HTC logo and I can't do nothing. I don't know what to do now. I tried to reboot on cmd but it still stuck at HTC logo. I tried to install the custom ROM by cmd but it was erro: device can not found. I think my laptop doesn't recognize my phone even though I already installed HTC driver. I thought when I plugged my phone in bootloader, choose fastboot, i saw fastboot usb though, so my phone connected.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] phishie:
I really appreciate your effort to write up this guide, it can be very helpful for those trying to piece together all these steps for the first time.

Although, I'm a little confused that it states the assumption the user has a HOX with a root-friendly firmware:

Why is the limit set at 1.82.502.3 when the One Click Root thread in the DEV section - here - specifies it works for 1.85 firmwares?
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] bbbasher:
Thank for for gathering all the info in one place. Most helpful! Got my HTC One XL (ATT) cleaned up and running on Clean 4.2 with the 1.85 radio. So far so good. Cheers!
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] thedauntlessone:
Because this thread was last updated May 29 before 1.85 was cracked.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] erwaso:
Can a mod update the the original post?

Sent from my HTC One X
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] rohanjain91:
thanx.. this the best guide..
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] rohan32:
I'm sorry that I haven't updated this post guys, I will be ASAP with 1.85. Just been really busy with AOKP and School stuff :)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] sanchitgrover:
Y is this thread not sticky ??
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] chicsp:
Thank you :)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] yawpc:
Error at root

plz i get these errors at the root stage, can you assist?

* daemon not running. starting it now on port 5037 *

* daemon started successfully *

DON'T TOUCH THE DEVICE OR UNPLUG WHILE ROOTING!

PUSH FILES

failed to copy 'busybox' to '/data/local/busybox': Permission denied

failed to copy 'su' to '/data/local/su': Permission denied

failed to copy 'Superuser.apk' to '/data/local/Superuser.apk': Permission denied

Unable to chmod /data/local/busybox: No such file or directory

Unable to chmod /data/local/su: No such file or directory

Unable to chmod /data/local/Superuser.apk: No such file or directory

failed on '/data/local/tmp' - Permission denied

link failed File exists

REBOOT

/system/bin/sh: can't create /data/local.prop: Permission denied

AGAIN REBOOT

AGAIN!?

mount: Operation not permitted

mount: Operation not permitted

/system/bin/sh: can't create /system/xbin/busybox: Read-only file system

Unable to chmod /system/xbin/busybox: No such file or directory

/system/bin/sh: /system/xbin/busybox: not found

/system/bin/sh: busybox: not found
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Heisenberg:
Unless the firmware on your phone is ancient this method won't work for you. I need to see your bootloader details so I can direct you to the correct method for your firmware. To boot into the bootloader there are two methods.

With phone powered on

Hold the volume down button, then hold the power button (so you're holding both buttons together), the button lights will start to flash, they will stop flashing and the screen will go blank, after a couple of seconds let go of the power button but continue to hold the volume down button until you reach the white screen with text, this is your bootloader.

With phone powered off

Hold the volume down button, then hold the power button (so you're holding both buttons together), after a couple of seconds let go of the power button but continue to hold the volume down button until you reach the white screen with text, this is your bootloader.

Please post the first five lines.

Sent from my Evita
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] yawpc:
RE:ERROR

EVITA PVT SHIP S-OFF RL

CID-1111111

HBOOT-2.14.0000

RADIO-0.24p.32.09.06

OpenDSP-V34.1.0.45.1219 eMMC-boot

Nov 26 2012, 18:37:14:12887

dont know if this is what you want

Plz assist me.. thank you

---------- Post added at 02:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:21 PM ----------

THIS IS MY SOFTWARE INFO ALSO IF IT CAN HELP

Android version 4.1.1

HTC sense version 4+

Software number: 3.18.502.9 710RD

HTC SDK API level

kernel version : 3.4.10-g3cdbb1e root@abm039#1 AMP PREEMPT

BASEBAND VERSION 0.24P.32.09.06_10.130.32.34L

BUILD NUMBER: 3.18.502.9.CL131981 RELEAE KEY
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Heisenberg:
The 3.18 root method is what you want. Please note: you need adb/fastboot and HTC drivers installed on your PC. Once you've done that you can go to htcdev.com and unlock your bootloader.

Sent from my Evita

---------- Post added at 12:11 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:09 AM ----------

If you have any further questions please ask in my q&a thread here:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2567916

We're getting off topic for this thread.

Sent from my Evita
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] yawpc:
RE:ERROR

PLZ WEN I read the blog, that method is for linux but i am on windows

"Root on the ATT 3.18 firmware for HTC One XL and SuperCID. Linux only for now"

plz help me
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Heisenberg:
I've answered you here as per my last post.

Sent from my Evita
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] __McB__:
I switched to AT&T last week from T-Mobile to get the Note. Overall the AT&T service has been good and the Note is great! My only concern is battery drain in no signal areas.

Specifically, I went to a movie last weekend and the theater was in the basement and there was no signal. At the start of the movie I had about 95% battery but by the end my battery was dead. I'm guessing the battery drained because it was constantly searching for a signal.

Is this common for the Galaxy Note? Is it common for AT&T? I ask because my t-mobile phones never did this. I've been to this theater many times, always had no signal, never had any battery drain on any t-mobile phones (sensation, galaxy s 4g, hd2, my-touch).

FWIW, my Note was completely stock but was rooted. I've since flashed UCLE2 and noticed the same drain in low or no signal areas. I'm sure I'll get suggestions to turn airplane mode on, or something like that. While I appreciate those suggestions I'm trying to determine if this is common to the phone or AT&T. I don't think I should have to switch off data/radio anytime the signal is low for fear of my battery draining in 2 hours.

Thanks!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] studacris:
While the battery does drain more with no signal, due to scanning for a network, as long as there is a signal it should be comparable to full service. That's a constant signal mind you if it goes in and out it is scanning.

I work downtown in a brick building surrounded by high rises, i get 1 bar in my office, my battery lasts me an entire work day.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] vanemburghj:
What I did, spend the money on extended battery

Yeah I know you think 2500 mAH should be pretty good, but isn't, just spend the money on extended battery. Am at 26 hours, with fairly hard use, on Mugen 5400 mAH and have 15% remaining. Does add some depth to it, but that is the price, daughter ordered me case that fits over extended battery can't wait till it gets here. If you are interested can post pics once the case is here so you have idea on overall look.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] __McB__:
Would no signal cause that much more drain? In the theater there was no signal. I couldnt browse or make a call. If memory serves there was a circle with a line through it where the 4g symbol would normally be. Still seems like an excessive amount of drain.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] vanemburghj:
Oh yeah, if it is constantly looking for signal, will suck a battery down in no time. Job has me go to places in the mid-west, my supervisor and I just know to put in airplane mode or turn off in certain places or we will have bricks due to quick battery drain.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] __McB__:
Interesting. Is this something unique to AT&T's service? I never had this occur with tmous. Maybe I'm just lazy but having to track if I have a signal all the time for fear of my battery draining that fast doesn't seem right.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] vanemburghj:
Not unique to AT&T, but once you figure out where you get no signal it becomes automatic reflex to go into airplane mode or turn off. Would assume since AT&Ts network coverage is larger than Tmobile would not occur as much.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] OutCastedSheep:
just got one for me and bro.

i got no signal half a day during work and it keep searching for it.

by time i finished, lost about 5-10% most.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] __McB__:
Wow. Big difference from what I saw. I think I'll need to go back to the theater now that I'm running UCLE2. I'll install CurrentWidget and see what is going on.

Maybe it was a fluke...hopefully cause I love this phone!
[Off-topic] Jarmezrocks:
Disruptions: Facebook Might Have a Smartphone in Its Future

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/27/facebook-tries-tries-again-on-a-smartphone/

sent to your doorstep from a flaming poo filled paper bag using the XDA app
[Off-topic] veeman:
If this is true, I won't buy it. It will probably be terrible just like the website.
[Off-topic] Occasus:
That is really true for me too. I think it would be to much to discuss about the reasons. Think this would end in a bashing war.
[Off-topic] kevinyohh:
We should remove the "smart" part from this rumor...

Enviado desde mi Motorola Electrify usando Tapatalk 2
[Off-topic] ScubaSteev:
The perks of the phone are.....1. You will be "liked"

2. You can "poke" girls legally;)

3. Siri will ask "what's on your mind"

4. It will hopefully have a stable good app

sent from my girlfriends bearded clam
[Off-topic] MissionImprobable:
[sarcasm] Yeah, there won't be any data mining going on with that thing [/sarcasm]
[Off-topic] - Swift -:
We have Blackberrys for a reason y'know Mark!

But the sensible people would get a Droid :cool:

Yea, I'm looking at you Tim. Not so smart now, eh?
[Off-topic] shravbits:
Dohh! The way tech companies derp around these days! Ridiculous! No one really even likes facebook anymore because of its epic IPO fail. And a word to you Zuckerberg, hope you can keep your, ahem, 'social network', alive. Besides, if they do make one, it will be a piece of OEM junk with loads of facebook apps and crap. They will fork gingerbread and call it FaceOS and it will include the facebook app, facebook camera, and every other useless link to talk to your friends. This will be called, drum roll please, fAPPS. Plus browser and Facebook settings app. What else do we need? Sorry, Play Store not included. Includes faceappstore, where you can download farmville and other crapy games. © Facebook, Inc.

Sent from a blaze of amazon using Tapatalk
[Off-topic] bdfull3r:
No one wants a facebook phone. NO ONE
[Off-topic] shravbits:
Exactly! You sir, should be the marketing director at Facebook, because they obviously don't know what people want. I hate when a totally web-based, software oriented company enters the hardware sector, because it usually fails.

Sent from a blaze of amazon using Tapatalk
[Off-topic] PureLogic:
worst idea ever. would be fun to see how it looks though :D
[Off-topic] ptmax13:
I agree that it's not going to be much of a phone, but I disagree with the idea that nobody wants one...

Have you seen the people obsessed with fb? They are worst fanboys than apple ones.

I think this is where fb base the success of their attempt to make a phone. To the fanboys...

But let's be real, facebook phone? with what OS? Android? No, fb and google are clearly not friends. So what OS? New OS? My only guess is fb making a deal with samsung and release a Tizen OS Facebook customized phone.. but even this sounds ridiculous...
[Off-topic] saywhatt:
this is stupid -.-
[Off-topic] Hanzo.Hasashi:
All the chicks will get it

Send from beneath my cloak of magic
[Off-topic] shravbits:
And hipsters

Sent from a blaze of amazon using Tapatalk
[Off-topic] MrLouie:
Why not windows mobile 8? Microsoft and Facebook are both 2nd rate in this game, maybe together they could have a chance vs. Android and iOS.
[Off-topic] tallyforeman:
Great... Another worthless piece of technology that some poor soul is going to make a mint off of. Why didn't I think of that :rolleyes:
[Off-topic] ScubaSteev:
Hey,iPhone will have a phone just as ****ty to compete with .....

sent from my foot in your a*s
[Off-topic] MissionImprobable:
GET OUT OF my HEAD!
[Off-topic] ScubaSteev:
Were you thinking that lol

sent from my foot in your a*s
[Off-topic] Jarmezrocks:
Ooooh how I love the responses to this thread :D

Knew this was controversial and exactly the reason I posted it. Great to see a generate consensus about feelings towards the announcement too!

Well guys and girls, just think....all its going to do is A) Steel the yuppy wanabes away from the clasp of Apple who have been holding the heard of sheep behind then for so long now. It will cater for those we don't give a sh!t about and it will make little difference to the Android community as a whole. B) Another (and sorry to put it into the same category - I don't agree with the title it was a direct copy and paste) "SMART" phone on the market is only going to make the Android hardware manufactorers lift their game even more! The Android scene I believe is high in the stakes with creating innovation and not war! I hardly hear a peep (I am sure it happens...but less is said about it and those parties involved settle fast) about two Android manufactorers in court locking horns like Apple has done with us as a whole. Us Android "scene" as a whole has tactifully (through healthy competition) improved and innovated the scene to the top, making the Android experience better for all of us on all devices.

About the only other OS I want to see take off is Gecko just because its an underdog and is kinda cool.

I dislike facebook but I find it a necessary evil as Google+ just hasn't taken off to compete against it here in Australia so its sorry to say I have to use the blasted time sink to communicate with friends and family.

Thats my take on all of this
[Off-topic] :
Zuckerfail!

Ka-Ching!
[Off-topic] shravbits:
Its gonna be way worse than a zuckerfail.... A complete phone catastrophe. Ehhhh... I get chills thinking about it

Sent from a blaze of amazon using Tapatalk
[Off-topic] mythos_:
FB can release whatever the h..l it wants as long as it doesn't buy opera. It's been a great browser for years. No need to turn into a social networking bloated mess.
[Off-topic] Jarmezrocks:
bahahaha the responses on this are hilarious! I am in stitches
[Off-topic] D@rekills4:
This one the most epic threads I have read in ages....

Theres only 1 reason to make such phones.

Jokes. Jokes everywhere.
[Off-topic] rjsmer:
FBWTF PHONE OF THE YEAR LOL:D:D:D
[Off-topic] deathnotice01:
chuck norris will endorse this phone with his roundhouse kick
[Off-topic] norpan111:
This is not true, it's Zuckerberg big brother who is trying to ruin the company by actually releasing a phone, I have seen it.. It's an iphone with a facebook sticker and every app is removed but the Facebook fapp, can't even call!

Oh found the brother :
[Off-topic] forexsq:
i have doubt facebook can compete
[Off-topic] lupin661:
Its sure that it will have big facebook name at the back. And another facebook at front. :D:p

send via postman

"press thanks if help"
[Off-topic] klaydze:
Nokia 3310 or FB phone? LOL

Sent from my Nexus One
[Off-topic] Phencyclidine:
do not worry there will be plenty of smart people to buy this phone
[Off-topic] Mjones307:
Wouldn't buy it

HTC vivid
[Off-topic] Guero.:
I only want one if it automatically tells everyone what I'm doing. :good:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Cyrusas:
Hey, guys,

I'm talking about this thread http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1633943

Are these issues resolved somehow? I'm sitting on ICS Stunner ROM and I'm afraid to do anything serious with my phone.

Shouldn't there be fixes when Samsung released official AOSP source of Notes' ICS?

Or am I missing something? I really want to do a completely clean install of some ROM, because my current ROM (the newest version of Stunner) works terribly, forcecloses, slugish, freezing all the time.

Can the behavior of my phone have something to do with the problem discussed in the thread I linked? (I don't understand anything in that thread :) )
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Belfia:
Hi

The issues regarding superbrick arent completely resolved. But there are Kernels for ICS wich contain a workaround. And so far noone has reported bricking with them.

It seems like the official kernel source from sammy still contained that bug. But now it has been bypassed. Still noone is completely sure yet that they are 100% safewhen it comes to wiping etc.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SpyderTracks:
There is also a workaround to repartition the data section effectively bypassing any damaged areas for anyone that has a brick and no warranty.

This of course reduces the data partitions size, and it's still pot luck as to how much damage would occur.

It's also a pretty tricky operation.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Cyrusas:
So if I want to install a stock ICS rom (the newly released one, not the old leak), I should dooo, what? :) Which is the safe kernel (the one with a workaround)?..

Sorry for stupid questions..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SpyderTracks:
Probably worth flashing stock ics ROM, with a custom kernel that's safe. Probably best to do it in mobile Odin. Make sure you extract the firmware file and only select ROM partition, then separately point to kernel.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] prakashraobs:
I think its better to be in Stock rom what we got and never do any experiment, instead of wasting time on it to get very little stuff with high risk.:(

even if some work around solution is there, its very hard to understand and not all will be doing that.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SpyderTracks:
I totally agree. Wait for safe ics kernels or use modified Cm9's for now.