yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] h3r3tic:
That's because there isn't lol. All it does is use more battery and put apps individually to each core when one core can handle it no problem. 1.5 is very fast for a cell phone. At 1.83 dual core that's like as fast as low budget laptops lol.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] schrochem:
Just flashed the rom. Nice and quick. Deciding on what to oc to use. Currently on 1.72. I'm on apex but open to recommendations for anything faster.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] brent0001:
So is it better to just put the setting back on disabled??
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] schrochem:
I've had system tuner for a long time. I agree with heretic. Before this kernel I was only hitting 1.24 and pretty much never the second CPU. I'm wondering if running both at say 1.24 vs one at 1.72 has any benefits. Maybe different battery use? I can run benchmarks and compare but...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] h3r3tic:
Try nova launcher ever since 1.2 on apex update I noticed some lag. I recently switched. Go launcher is smoothest by far butbu can only have a 5 icon dock.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] giantenemybird:
In case anyone cares here see some battery results from this rom. I HAVE AN EXTENDED BATTERY. However I think you can still draw some conclusions. I intentionally did a **** ton of what I consider normal usage. Mostly texting, some sexting, some browsing, about 40 seconds of adult cinema viewing since that's about all I needed, lots of facebooking, setting up my settings and layout in apex. I used lowest brightness and the only processor change I made was setting the governor to conservative and setting minimum to 192. I ended up with 10.5 hours of ON SCREEN TIME. I'm guessing that would translate to a little over six hours on stock battery. I did not use juice defender.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] slowpc:
Well , been running as my daily driver for some time now since release and used during my trip back home from the north.

Was very surprised with the quality and battery life while listening to podcasts and gps usage here and there when the garmin was not working good. Also played some games while the other half drove and was overclocked at 1.83 with no problems.

Will say that thank you Winston Salem att towers for turning on LTE ... getting 10mb down on HSPDA with this modem as well (On ANR plan and not gotten in contact with rep to add LTE on mine since I got my note at launch :( )
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DConrad2010:
You can download Root Call Block from the Market for free. The best call/SMS blocker on the market!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] slowpc:
Was going to say that same thing :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Izzue:
Hahahhah
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] gwbard:
lol :silly:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] paleh0rse:
Thanks, I'll check it out! ..I'll call you back in 15 minutes." I think it's called a "reject with message" function for the incoming-call screen?

I'll check out that app... and I'm sorry about the OT post hotwire! :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] paleh0rse:
quick question: should we flash the newer r2 kernel on top of 10.1, or would it be better to wait for an update to the rom itself?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dhoang:
I just flashed r2 on top of 10.1. Working great so far with no problem.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Killemalll:
Using SmartassV2 on RC10.1/r2 the 2nd core of the Note comes on quite often and it goes all the way to the max frequency.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] aevans88:
They are right though. Doesn't really need the second core
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] taob:
Anyone else seeing "Emergency calls only" when they pull down the notification shade? I would expect that if I didn't have a SIM card inserted, but mine is in there, unlocked, and I'm able to make normal phone calls. This is using r10.1 and the UCLF6 radio on TELUS. I don't recall seeing this behaviour before.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ridikolous:
Reboot a couple of times fixes this issue

Gnote rock'n cm9.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] taob:
I've rebooted probably five times since installing this ROM... still a problem.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ridikolous:
Clear cache and dalvik, fixed it for me. I had the same problem you had. Couple of reboot helps

Gnote rock'n cm9.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] aevans88:
Lmao @ giantenemybird
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Ltilt2:
This is one of my favorite Rom. Specially with H0t's new kernel. Loving my note...thank you
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] markadan:
I see an issue when parts of the toggle settings UI is missing if you use a dpi lower than 320. I was using 240. Has anyone seen this?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] taob:
That's not it either. It mysteriously came back at some point overnight without any intervening reboots or wipes. I went in airplane mode just now to see what would happen. As expected, the carrier string changed to "No service". However, when I disabled airplane mode, it did not change back. I am able to make phone calls, I toggled mobile data on and off, etc. Still says "No service". So it seems like whatever handles the carrier string in the notification shade isn't quite keeping up.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jerdog:
OP - please post kernel sources for the custom kernel in order to be within GPLv2 compliance. If the kernel is not yours then please post a link to the kernel binary.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] paleh0rse:
I think he is just waiting for the kernel to mature beyond RC status, which is perfectly acceptable, but I could be wrong...?

I do believe the kernel is his, though:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=28729528
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jerdog:
Sorry GPL makes no distinction between "RC" and "Final" - if you're distributing a binary based on GPL code, i.e. Linux kernel, then you MUST include the source.

If that link is in fact his kernel, then the OP will need to point to that in his first post so that the link is drawn between the two. That kernel does have source posted so that's a good thing. We just need to have the link between the two identified for GPL compliance.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] bigbiff:
He posted his git yesterday at midnight or so. Check OP. I was able to recompile it.

EDIT

Sorry thought I was in his kernel thread: For reference: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=28729528&postcount=1
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jerdog:
HAHA - yep I see that there. He needs to link it in his ROM post. I am sure he'll do it when he sees these posts.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Donjuanal:
Ive looked but havent seen this particular issue mentioned. Correct me if im wrong. I know current internal and external memory are mounted as sdcard and external_sd which doesnt really bother me much.

It may just be my recovery. But official cwm refuses to read my external sd. When i choose to install zip from sdcard it loads internal which makes it annoying since i have all my various zips loaded on external.

Anyone know if this is because of the mount definitions or if its something i can fix?

This ROM is amazingly fast and efficient this is really the only thing bugging me currently. Excellent work by the dev!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] paleh0rse:
I highly suggest switching to TWRP2.2. It's awesome!

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=25945967

You can always switch back to your old cwm if you need to recover an older nandroid.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] slowpc:
Yep , running the R2 kernel tweaked a bit here and this rom and just shy of 7500 on antutu and running great.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] parcsalooc:
Anyone having issues streaming movies via the google play movie app? Saying it will only work via wifi or download? Tried disabling root via OTARootkeeper to see if that was the issue and also checked the build.prop to make sure there were no different device or country letters in there. No luck so far.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] docfreed:
Same issue here - still says "no service" but able to make calls, etc... Reboot doesn't help nor does toggling airplane mode????
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Shdowalker:
I've actually had this issue before and just reflashed a previous version of CWM then the recovery showed both cards again.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] taob:
It's almost as if whatever looks up the mobile connectivity state only does it once at boot. It does it too early, before the network can establish itself. I have a PIN on my SIM, so the phone cannot get onto the network until I enter the PIN. By the time I unlock my SIM, it is possible that the carrier string routine has already determined that there is "no service" or "emergency calls only", and doesn't bother checking again.

On a whim, I did a "hot reboot" (restarts Android dalvik stuff, but not the underlying Linux OS), because that does not change the state of the radio. Sure enough, after the hot reboot, the carrier string now says "TELUS". But I've only done it this one time, so it isn't really proof of anything yet. ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] paleh0rse:
Has anyone successfully gotten the AT&T VVM app to work on this Rom? If so, how?

Mine says "Could not play..." for every vm I get, and I've read that some (all?) CM9 builds have an issue with the app's communication with the system media player.

Other than switching to GV, does anyone have any ideas?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DConrad2010:
The call reject option i use is the "Fast Reject" option. You can test it by adding your house number to the reject list. And make sure you familarize yourself with the many options.

---------- Post added at 06:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:20 PM ----------

How about using YouMail? You can also use their website application.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] paleh0rse:
Thanks for the info!

Crazy enough, though, it turns out that hotwire's Rom has the reject-with-message option on the incoming screen if you move up on the circle (or maybe this is a standard CM9 function?)

I'm such a noob sometimes...:o
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] paleh0rse:
ok, this just started happening to me tonight. Does anyone know why my device is staying at max speed or deep sleep, but nothing in between? Anyone know how to fix this?

Smartassv2 gov on hotkernel r2, 384/1.83.

Screenshot below...

Edit: nevermind, reinstalling hotkernel r2 and clearing caches seems to have fixed it for now. /shrug
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] erick161:
I'm having this problem as well. I'm running FJ latest stock build. Had to disable a file to get the kernal to work...but I'm probably just going to switch to a CM9 build.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] schrochem:
My phone is faster than I need it....

It's haulin

However, I always like to tinker.

I ran KSM and checked the page* and it is "doing it's thing".

Is the "pages to scan' the cache size?

256 is what I have that set to and thought perhaps it's not a coincidence...if so should I increase it?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] paleh0rse:
Now my mic input isn't working when paired to my car's Bluetooth (speaker output does work). It's as though the pairing is only working in one direction... any ideas?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] taob:
Uhhhh, okay... I'll bite: Why is it discontinued? GPL issues?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] paleh0rse:
We lose hotwire?! :(
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jayRokk:
Because Cyanogen put him out of business

Not flamming or anything but this was a "port" figuratively speaking and now that CM supports the Note with nightlies I don't see why hotwire would continue this unless he put his own tweaks into it
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] taob:
Maybe because we have an official CM9 release now?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1778170
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] h0tw1r3:
Recent posts from a senior moderator have prompted me to take a serious look at my responsibility and liability for publicly distributing software based on the GPLv2.

Therefore I have placed discontinuation notices on my development threads and will no longer be providing software releases (binary blobs).

This does not mean I am leaving the development community. I will continue to support other developers on XDA, stay active with my kernel fork on github, and spend more time on collaborating with the cyanogenmod development team.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rohankb:
I think I wanna cry. This is my fave daily driver...

Thanks for all your efforts hotwire. You have laid some awesome work down.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] taob:
Ah yes, that's what I figured. Thanks for your work on this ROM! I'll keep using it in the meantime until the official CM9 release gets shaken out a bit more, then probably switch to that... or CM10. ;-)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] imb951:
sad :crying:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] sdc177:
I'd like that latest kernel and ROM too please if anyone has links!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] imb951:
wow, chill man. I had asked for a PM with the link to the kernel originally because I didn't have a chance to download it before it went down. edited the post with a random emoticon after someone PM'ed me, THATS ALL! I have no affiliation with other devs or roms, just a user of XDA who likes to flash roms and kernels to make my phone better.

I AM HUGELY DISAPPOINTED THAT THIS ROM/KERNEL IS DISCONTINUED JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE TRUST ME. :crying:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jerdog:
I too want to express my disappointment that this work is discontinued. If the OP does not want to follow the requirements of the GPLv2 that is his business, but I see no evidence that he is in violation of the GPL or XDA's stance on it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DACHIGGA:
Best rom I've ever used. Sad to see it discontinued.

Then again, it is pretty much perfect atm. I've no issues with it. and OC is just the cherry on top.

Thanks h0tw1r3 for all your hard work. If you ever put out any more roms, I'll be the first to use it!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dkelley:
cheers, as I said, sorry if I made a bad calculation of your involvement. It was just based on your two little posts, and I'm oversensitive about people going too far when tracking down possible abusers of the GPL.

We're all sad about this for sure.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] paleh0rse:
There was another member (perhaps a mod?) who was in this thread talking about the GPL a day or two ago. I can't find his posts any more, or my replies to his posts, but he basically concluded that hotwire should be good to go if he simply added a link in the OP to his other kernel thread wherein there was already a link to the kernel source. I guess that didn't turn out to be the case...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jerdog:
That was me and you are correct. As I stated above there are no issues from a GPL perspective - it's the OPs choice to discontinue this thread, not XDA's.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] COA4178:
Best kernel around! Great job
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] taob:
Anyway, there is no use debating about what happened now. Official CM9 for the SGH-I717 is out now, and when I find a reason to flash a new ROM, I will likely go with that. In the meantime, h0tw1r3's 10.1 works just as well now as it did before he discontinued it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Bataga:
Thanks for "PUSHING" him to ultimatly discontinue development here. Xda is quickly losing top developers in my opinion. Thanks again mods
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jerdog:
I am so sorry that you feel like anyone is above the law. I did no such thing - only asked him to follow the rules. He complied - and then read the GPL and decided he didn't want to be responsible for following all of the requirements (i.e. the law) so he said he was discontinuing. That's HIS prerogative and HIS choice. He's welcome to continue - in fact I told him much the same thing. He's not in violation now that he complied with the rules like everyone else is supposed to. We also didn't remove any of his work or tell him to stop. So I am not sure where you get off making statements about things that you have no idea about. You should probably be more careful in the future.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] escabar:
post it on RootzWiki.com H0tw1r3??? Will gladly post some beer money at the end of next week. Though if you totally wish to be done with things, that is totally up to you and understandable also. This was my daily driver and was rock solid. The OC UV kernel was really starting to shine. This is such a loss. Thank you for all your hard work so far H0tw1r3!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] slowpc:
Same here.... :(

I dont think my note will be getting updated any time soon...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] wish777:
well....this is great..Stuff like this that's why are developers leave....follow rules some mods say?...I've seen alot worse get by the cracks and its favoritism .in some cases...Remember he did this in his own time and probably didn't receive much for all his time spent.I bet 1/3 of the people using this rom actually donated..I'm not using this rom..but developers should get accommodated for what they do.,

And if this continues there will be alot more people leaving BELIEVE ME...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] babyfacedkayos:
Doesnt get it... >>>>>>>
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] breakingspell:
All of you people making a big deal out of this are rather amusing. It's plain as day to me.

To post binaries conforming to the GPL licensing, you have to provide source. Sharing his source is Hotwire's business, and he obviously chose to leave it at that.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Bataga:
Seems like a waste of a law. Did anyone other than the police...i mean mods care? WAH!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] paleh0rse:
As the mod already stated, hotwire DID post the source -- hell it's still posted -- so he is/was in full compliance in the eyes of the mods here. His decision, after reviewing the GPL himself, was probably based on not having to deal with it one way or another.

Let's just leave it alone and move on to some new builds of the kernel... please and thank you?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dkelley:
Just wanted to point out that its not actually a law. Its a guideline, and yes it can be taken very seriously and there have been precedents set, but it isn't an actual law.

If you don't comply with the gpl you are not treated well by others developers in the future if you ever want to use their gpl code again. So its wise to follow the rules. It CAN be a legally binding agreement, but a government imposed law like theft or tax evasion? Nope, not even close.

At least back in the days when we were coming up with the rules for sharing our open source work that is how things were, and I believe it has still not become Criminal activity to not comply with the gpl.

That is just meant as information and opinion, not controversy or argument. :-) but I like to be syntactically accurate when possible.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dkelley:
Yea you're right. Just sucks is all.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] babyfacedkayos:
Amen
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] armyboy11b:
Dam :/ hope u still sticking around bro!!!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] StevenMattera:
Damn you Richard Stallman, DAMN YOU!!!!!! It's unfortunate to see this rom discontinued. :(
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ridikolous:
Hot kernel r3 is out on goo im

Gnote rock'n cm9.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] paleh0rse:
Awesome! Is there a detailed changelog posted anywhere? Or is the list of commits the only list?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ridikolous:
No idea

Gnote rock'n cm9.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] h0tw1r3:
I am continuing to support/release my kernel builds on GitHub, and will be making announcements going forward on Google+. This may include my kang of CM9, not sure yet as I'm poring all my time into Jelly Bean now.

In general I enjoy the community here at XDA, but supporting and distributing software on a forum like this is just plain maddening. Therefore I won't be making announcements on XDA or wading through mountainous threads. If someone wants to announce my releases, repackage, rebrand, or whatever here on XDA - more power to ya!

For those who left me nice comments (no I didn't read them), thanks :) Please don't be offended when I say I'm not going to be reading through the thread. I do this for fun, not for the attention or accolades from others. If you asked something and really need an answer, PM me or hit me up on github or Google+. Better yet, file a bug report on Github!

Peace
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] wase4711:
yeah, I can't find a change log for r3 anywhere either..

oh well, its gotta be good stuff!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] gordec:
Anyone knows how to verify in System Tuner that both cores are running? I forced all CPU on in the boot settings, init.d, but i have no way of seeing if it's using both cores.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rohankb:
It will show cpu0 at various speeds and the other cpu1 at diff speeds or offline. That's under "CPU"
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] gordec:
For some reason the first time i set force all CPU on the second CPU showed activity, but every since it hadn't worked.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] borijess:
R3 kernal was dropping my quadrant score down to under 3000 and antutu score was 4900. Running OC at 1674 on FJ ics stock TW.

Sent from the TermiNOTEr! ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] taob:
:victory:

Yeah, I gotta agree with you here. I remember the very first time I logged into XDA years ago (I had another account at the time) and was flabbergasted by how everything to do with a ROM was packed into a gargantuan thread, and newcomers were expected to sift through thousands of posts or risk being chastised for "not doing a search" (which was not always effective) or "not reading what was already posted several times" (which is often very time-consuming and frustrating).

There really should be one forum category for a ROM, with individual threads of different topics and issues. But then that brings up the other problem with the third-party Android ROM scene: there are just too many of them, most of them 99% the same as the next. It's great that anyone with a compiler is allowed to build their own ROM, but do we really need 30+ slightly different builds of AOSP/AOKP for every model of device? Development effort is scattered about, and could be made much strong and more effective if things were coordinated better. Personally, if things were focused onto CyanogenMod, MIUI, and perhaps two others that rise to the top, I'd be more than happy.

Anyway, you probably won't even see this message, h0tw1r3, but good luck to ya.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] pclaunch:
I have searched all over github and goomanager but I cant seem to find a link to the 10.1 rom. All I can find is the latest Kernel release. Is it still possible to get the rom download?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Android The Greek:
Anything over 1700 forces restart on AOKP for me. Great job though.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] imb951:
https://github.com/h0tw1r3/kernel_samsung_sghi717/downloads

R4 is awesome! Thanks again h0tw1re!!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rohankb:
R3 kept sending my phone to FC and reboot as soon as it started, never got it to work went back to R2

On R2 I've been at 1836 since he released it, very stable. I had dropped the voltage as well but then set it back to default to see if there is any difference on battery life.

Just installed, thanks for making mention it was released...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] severinca:
BLN

What happened to BLN in the newest update?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] borijess:
R4 working great!

Sent from the TermiNOTEr! ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Rocket42:
Wonder if someone has an idea or if i was missing something. I flashed r2 when it came out on king kang. All was great 1836/192 smartassv2 ...but when i got a noti my cap lights would come on and stay that way forever unless i woke up my phone...didnt and dont want or use bln...was there something somewhere i should of changed to have them go off as normal...or for that matter not go on when i get a noti? Im on latest king kang but have not flashed the kernel because of that...;) thank you

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2