yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] incisivekeith:
But what caused it? I thought the new bootloader allowed wiping from CWM. I really need some expert advice if someone can help with this, as it seems a little unique in this thread, unlike the LPY bricks. Isnt there anyway I can revive my Note? It has not even been a week since I got this phone. Thanks for the help in advance.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] opsakas:
#History: I flashed LPF last night over rooted LPY, and

#everythign went fine. I have been trying to figure our

#the wifi issue on LPF so I flashed LPF again, flashed CWM

#and then wiped the data.

Once again, I see common demoninator - CWM
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mydear2020:
I change modem back to LB2 better them LR1
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ssss69:
No one said that, the real developers have told of you ti stop doing wipes from official samsungs roms

Its impossible that a bootloader fixes the problems that samsung has with his emmc driver
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] SoonHD2:
Is ZSLPF multilanguage (i need Finnish language)?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
Top developers are saying CWM is not the common denominator, because people have bricked when they wipe in stock recovery and supposedly as a factory reset in settings too.

We just are quick to say CWM because it's what most people use to wipe.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] E90 Commie:
If I understand the latest development of the thread correctly, there is an I/O bug present with LPF, correct?

That assumption is based on the case described earlier where a CWM wipe from the LPF kernel produced a brick (stuck at factoryfs) - exactly like LPY.

I was thinking about flashing the LPF today but in that case I will wait and see what is happening.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] jjamain:
Done installing lpf using pc odin. No yellow triangle or binary counter problem. Run smooth and stable.

http://jjpda.blogspot.com/2012/05/how-to-install-n7000zslpf-ics-403.html?m=0
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] musashiro:
any link for this unfortunate event??
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] E90 Commie:
This is the post I was thinking about:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=26250694&postcount=411
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] panyan:
you think that one test over wifi is sufficient to make that conclusion :confused:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] musashiro:
OMFG, :eek:,, so the bricking saga continues.. and i assume we will see more episodes of this...

NOTE: If this is your first time flashing and you are reading this, avoid flashing any ICS from sammy for now... or else, you might get a free admission to *superbricked club*
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] gattari:
Cancelled

Inviato dal mio GT-N7000 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mydear2020:
I did used wifi I used 3.5g gsm mobile network
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mfractal:
No this guy wiped with lpt kernel!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] musashiro:
as stated he flashed LPF,
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] gattari:
Yes my reading error

Inviato dal mio GT-N7000 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] E90 Commie:
(I made the important statement bold)

Yes, it is obvious that the unfortunate fact is that the LPF kernel was being used to wipe the data.

I am annoyed since I was thinking about returning to ICS with this LPF but if the bricking saga continues, it means waiting until it got a final solution.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
LPT? That's the modem? It looks like he used a combination of LPF and LPY when he wiped in CWM, like wiped some while in LPF and then wiped some in LPY too. But, he sees the Samsung logo? So, makes me wonder if he can get in download mode or not. Typically the bricks aren't doing anything??
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] M3TALLICA:
I'll wait till Sammy publishes kernel sources.

We all were confident when LPY was out but few devs warned and were persistent.

And now there's the first SuperBrick of LPF and more to follow, I'm afraid.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] incisivekeith:
Ok, so it seems there is no way to revive my Note. What should I do next? I got my Note a week ago, so can I still return it for another one? If there are still ways to fix it, please let me know. Any devs want to help?

If all fails, are there any local repair shops in NY City which can fix the phone in a few hours?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] :
Who bricked from LPF?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] tony888:
Hello, I am going to flash this weekend, can anyone confirm if there's voice recorder? It's important for my work, thnx in advance :D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
LPY has it so I'm sure LPF does too, it's a samsung rom.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] helmerjensen:
It has voice recorder, but read the forum before you flash.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
Can we absolutely confirm that we have a true "brick" from LPF and it was NOT a user error, that is WAS the I/O bug?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] musashiro:
if i had the power to stop this pathetic bug, i will do it.. but since im just a normal IT student, can't do anything...

unless there is a tutorial to have a fresh start and self-study.. :D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] felixmulia:
Yes,you bricked ur Note.. go to service centre and tell them something stupid like u update via kies but suddenly ur battery run out.. they maybe change ur board..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mcreego:
My impression after a day off use.

Quite fast overall but the System after sole hours of using gets slower.

1- slow keyboard sometimes;

2- it uses a lot of ram.

3 - spen is slower then gb
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
Thank you, thank you! There is no major tech announcement about Samsung Galaxy Notes being bricked because of an ICS upgrade! The bricks are still few and far, even if they are 5%, that is still very very small. There is a reason it is only on XDA and not major media outlets or even an official announcement from Samsung that I have not seen. Is there one I missed?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] M3TALLICA:
If the kernel was safe, there would have been 0% incidents.

---------- Post added at 09:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:38 PM ----------

How many people have bricked their phones while wiping data/factory reset/backup restore on GB kernels?

0%. Because GB is safe.

And I'm referring to GB only, even before leaked roms were yet to be introduced.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
But, all of these bricks are from people updating to ICS through Odin or getting a rom that is not from their country or whatever. Can we confirm there are bricks from people that are getting ICS OFFICIALLY from Samsung through Kies or OTA?

Edit:

I'm beginning to think having an international phone is just a pain because there are so many ICS variables and such. Maybe I should've gotten an ATT Note? Hmm....
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
I don't get what you are saying.....
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
Ahh, okay, I think I see what you mean. :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] praetorius:
and this guy wiped with CWM. there was another guy in the previous posts who did a wipe on the original recovery and survived.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] CosmoDroid:
The one who bricked his "NOTE" from the LPF kernel has a looooong history of wiping etc with the affected LPY kernel....May be the damage was already done while on LPY which just showed itself after wiping on LPF through CWM...Someone who's upgrading from complete stock or other non affected GB ROMS haven't yet reported of any type of "brick" issues....I know its still not "safe" to assume dat this is a "safe" kernel...but why say that it's unsafe without seeing it for a day or two...may be Samsung did fix emmc issue with this one....Plus the guy who bricked was doing all sorts of things like flashing it many times....using yet untested CFkernel...wiping from cwm..."perhaps" he did something wrong in some step...Let's wait and see if a complete stock user faces a "BRICK"...then we will be sure that this one's an unsafe bet...So I'm waiting nd watching...while also enjoying my supersmooth LPF installed NOTE.... :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] helmerjensen:
Well im off the ICE for now.

Think i will give it sometime to get better and for Samsung to release source :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] NOORHASHIM:
Wt..

any one answer plz :S

is this safe and recommend

if i flash LA3 pit pda csc phone

then flash this rom ?

and recommend if i flash this rom 2 time ?

and when i finsh the flash

i should do full wipe ? " *2767*3855# ?!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] aussiebum:
I've done a factory reset (via Settings) in stock LPY using stock LPY kernel (ie. stock recovery) and also survived.

From all the posts floating around, the problem appears to be specifically down to full wiping / factory reset with Chainfire's CWM-injected "stock" kernels.

So in summary: DON'T USE SAMSUNG SUPPLIED, CHAINFIRE CWN-INJECTED KERNELS TO FULL WIPE/FACTORY RESET. At least until the ICS sourcecode is out, devs can figure out what the problem is and compile a non-bricking CWM kernel.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ssss69:
Come ok guys you seem stupid

There is a kernel issue with the emmc driver. There has been people that have bricked their phone using the official option ofrece factory reset in the settings menú, and that doesnt involve cwm

Cwm has nothing ti do with this bricks. Think about, did cwm created problem in gb?

You have pretty much confidence in samsung, you think that they care about a minor issue in the driver? They dont care about it because only xda people install cwm and do constant wipes, the rest of the people just uses their phone without wiping ir touching anything

Stop thinking that this kernels are safe you aire trying ti convince yourself that samsung cant do any damage
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ohnoohnock8:
i need to ask...why my wifi said authentication error occurred....
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] rajendrakumardbg:
I am extremely dissapointed with the N7000 xda forum everybody just keeps discussing superbrick not much development related discussion happens Just a few thoughts though..

1. I have recently bought note and needed ics so flashed lpy, wiped used stock recovery also through cwm recovery. Flashed LPF with bootloader and wipe through stock recovery I am still alive....!!! Thats just me and I did it after reading about superbrick and I am a noob by your standards but would have flashed at least 400 times on my previous phone (GT i9003), had some soft bricks, iemi lost but was able to reinstate my device so not afraid at all....

2. For all who want stable ICS snappier rom with all features working fine i suggest go ahead and flash it with PC odin you wont regret.

3. For those who donts agree should not be on XDA but keep using your phone as it is it will never ask for money from your wallet nor will it pinch you in the back...

4. Study the forum well and decide for yourself if you are a user...at the end of the day it is your expensive device which is at risk. Read 1000 points to have clarity regarding flashing if you don't understand any step

5. Please know why each step is conducted and relevance of every file, tool and step..

At last this is just my opinion not forcing any thoughts on other but I am surely dissapointed by this forum which has some of the biggest names around, I think I was better with my Galaxy SL...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] praetorius:
well, i flashed this and it is smooth. imho,those who bricked are the people like us.who have a HISTORY of flashing non official modifications.

Zapped through server hops to XDA forums
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] djapor96:
kernel + radio

my Note have lpy rom. can i only lpf kernel +radio with mobile odin flash?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] boogeyman:
I did it and all went fine
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] rajendrakumardbg:
If I were you I will flash the LPF rom through PC odin with all the files including PIT and bootloader as provided by Samsung and not apply too much brain. I would lose all application though but will be more safe and cleaner install so snappier rom!:):):):)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ohnoohnock8:
That mean i need to do wt?!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] akenis:
Do you notice any differences on LPY using the LPF kernel? Stock kernel or CF rooted kernel?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ohnoohnock8:
but i did it before...and the problem wasn't fix
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] praetorius:
that means you go to your routers menu and change the region to "asian" or if you do not have that option, try changing the radio channel. it is all in the wireless settings of your router. failing that, or to avoid conflicts.with other routers of which YOU DO NOT HAVE CONTROL to change the settings, change your phone modem to what worked for you before, LPY, LB2 or whatever.

Zapped through server hops to XDA forums
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] gurnishdhillon:
LPY to LPF??

Flashed with or without bootloader?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] fulcrum1971:
6 hrs on this Rom. All fine. The lock screen bug has gone. So far so very good.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] gurnishdhillon:
rooter unrooted ??

method of updating?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] jaskiratsingh:
Which lock screen bug?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] praetorius:
Flashed with bootloader and complete wipe with PIT repartition, rooted as per dr. Ketan's guide.

Personal apps with data reloaded via titanium backup.

Zapped through server hops to XDA forums
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] fulcrum1971:
Some times the phone would never lock. Neither with swipe nor with the pin.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] jaskiratsingh:
Oh.... I had no deep sleep issue when upgraded from gb to lpy using mobile odin, but afterwards i flashed using pc odin, hard rest the device and no issue. Battery is same as gb, lasts for 30-40 hours, depending on usage. WiFi eats battery like crazy :(

Immediately after installing phone felt less snappier but after a while it is not so. Snappier than gb :)

Waiting for Asian version.....
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
There's a pretty big difference between the Notes. The ATT Note has snapdragon processor (1.2 Ghz) and LTE. The GT-N7000 has Exerynos (spelling?) chip and it's 1.4.

The reason I made that comment is because it would have been A LOT easier to get an OTA update via AT&T than the GT-N7000, because I will never get an OTA because AT&T doesn't support it.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] motumbo:
If you go to AT&T note forum most likely people will cry for having an international note and blaming AT&T for lack of support.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
So what you are saying is there is no perfect one because we have crappy carriers?!? Ha! :D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] crualfoxhound:
can any one help please.

my gnote cant get past datafs on pc odin
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
Are you trying to ODIN this new firmware? Can you share any more details? Give us every step listed in Odin?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] hp79:
I just flashed mine with N7000ZSLPF, no problems using PC Odin as in the guide. I was on ICS Rocket Rom v1 (based on N7000XXLPY).

Startup screen was in Chinese, but since I'm Korean I can read some Chinese characters. So it wasn't hard to change it to English. But you guys probably already know where the language menu is by heart.

Very smooth so far. But I have no apps installed at the moment.

I didn't like Rocket Rom because too many customization and some of those lags which could be (or not) from the customization.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] incisivekeith:
I have read several posts since I posted my issue, which commented on the issue, but added little value to the discussion. Like all of you, I like my Note quite a bit, and it's not a great position to be in, when you suddenly hit a hard stop while you were planning to use your device for business and personal activities.

Regardless of whether it is soft or hard or super bricked, my device doesn't go beyond the factoryfs and "NAND write" prompt while flashing any ROM - be it official stock or leaked stock. I will clear out some misinformation that has spread about what steps I followed later today when I have enough time. I am a very cautious flasher and followed all steps mentioned in posts from devs or people who knew what they were talking about - of course, you always take a risk as most of those instructions are standard and don't address variations of situations.

For now, all I am looking at is some sincere advice and help in terms of what I should do next:

Are there local repair centers in the US (NYC) where I can get my Note fixed?

Is it possible for me to return my Note to the seller and get a new one as it has only been a week since I bought it? How would I manage it?

Is there ANYTHING left for me to do so that I can fix this "brick" myself? (only people with know-how comment on this)

What is the turn-around time if I have to send it to Samsung? Do I have to pay, and how much, and for what - shipping, hardware fix, etc.? (considering I have had this device for only a week)

I apreciate your instinct to comment on the issue, but for now, I would really like some helpful comments which actually address what I need to do to fix this issue or the next steps. Thanks.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] bkeaver:
The AT&T Note has a 1.5 Ghz processor not a 1.2Ghz
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] :
This one can do dpi 220 with out fc. Pretty cool

Just need to replace people app with exdialer
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] wolf5150:
AT&T version has Snapdragon specifically for LTE capability. Exynos processor is not LTE-friendly
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
When I looked, I saw 1.2.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] bkeaver:
I have owned both...it definitely has a 1.5Ghz snap dragon processor
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
No, the ATT Note isn't using the Exynos processor. It uses Snapdragon. It has to because Exynos isn't compatible with LTE (hence why our phones don't have it).

I tried to get ATT to activate my Note the "legal" way at first when I bought it on eBay (did not buy in contract because my contract wasn't up). They typed the IMEI number in and it did not register on their system because it isn't an ATT note. So they could not "activate" it. They just put LTE on my account (and left my unlimited data) and told me I could possibly contact Samsung about getting this phone re-flashed or something. They obviously didn't know there were different Note versions.

But, then I got the APNs and am using the international Note just fine on the ATT network.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] hp79:
What are you guys talking about?

International N7000 has Exynos dual core at 1.4 GHz, and HSPA+, and physical home button.

AT&T has Qualcom dual core at 1.5 GHz, and LTE, and all touch buttons.

Exynos is still a better choice. Read more from here:

http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/atandt-galaxy-note-review/

Korean N7000 is different too. It's similar to AT&T but has mobile TV and hardware home button.

For me, I would hate to have AT&T version since you would have to wait for AT&T to load their own crap and then finally release the updates. International N7000 is the best for me since I don't need DMB TV, and I don't need LTE.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] bkeaver:
Pleawe don't quote me to think your correcting me on something that i have already owned... I know what type of processor it has in it. The person i was correcting was saying the AT&T version having a 1.2 and i was correcting that.. I don't know why this thread launched inot a darn at&t vs international anyways..can we go back to the thread topic please..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Ashren81:
thanks for the info.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] npras42:
Sorry guys. I searched the thread for "mirror" and it didnt throw up any results. Are there any known fast mirrors yet?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] rrambert:
Has anyone experienced GPS lag? When traveling today my GPS was lagging way behind. I loaded LPF last night and have been running close to 20hrs now. Battery life is good and I love it. No issues with the exception of the GPS lag right now. Feedback please.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] sotiris20:
Here is a torrent link:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=26211318
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ryn888:
Well if this is just a leak. It is the perfect leak for me. I don't experience bugs...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
Yeah, Quallcom Snapdragon processor on the ATT note. If it was Verizon instead of ATT, LTE would be a MUST. ATT doesn't have LTE here yet, but Verizon does and my friend has it and it's awesome fast. I wish our Note had LTE for real.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] andreww88:
The ATT note does not have LTE. LOL. And yes I have a note and here is a screenshot that you requested. :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] blitzkriegh:
ive been running LPF for 2 days now and very satisfied. no pixel salad that i experienced in LPY. no wifi issues, battery is outstanding.

very fast and snappy for a stock rom. i feel sorry for those who experienced any soft bricks. i hope u get it resolved soon.

it doesnt bother me at all. dont do or experiment flashing this and this that are out.of scope from the guides that was shared by the devs.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] aussiebum:
Ah, the bootloader emmc 'fix' was just BS I recall reading last night.

Anyways, have u tried using 1.87 Odin and flash the full official stock LPF package, with repartition option checked and correct PIT file selected?

Sent from Galaxy Note
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] sean1983:
Some Screenshots

2 Days & love LPF

:) =3

Samsung Galaxy Note - N7000 - Kingston 16GB Class 10 MicroSD

Running N7000ZSLPF / N7000XXLR1
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] almostinsane:
Reflashed the german rom a few days ago. Flashed this rom a few minutes ago. Damn, it is way faster than the german rom, no stuttering at all.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] praetorius:
this was your fatal mistake. how many times (more than hundreds, maybe) must it be said that NEVER WIPE FROM CWM.

others were lucky, apparently, you were not.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] sonkameja:
This is the most idiotic post I've ever read in my life as a member of xda dev forums. Please never come back here ever again and post a single letter.

Mods throw the ban sledge hammer at this fool!

You might as well encourage owners of gt-n7000 phones to flash to a firmware meant for the att gnote
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] rizdroid:
Clap! Clap! Clap! Can we call this "I/O issue" HOAX? ;)

On the other hand, seems people who use CWM are likely to brick.

BTW, that's why I gave up using CWM: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=17248224&postcount=138