yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC ChaCha] wdwray:
Will this work with a US (AT&T) Cha Cha (AKA Status)? If there a fallback to the original ROM if needed?

---------- Post added at 11:10 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:59 AM ----------

Link doesn't work. After signing into my Facebbook acct and attempting to post the message to my wall, I get this error message:

Fatal error: Call to undefined method TransactSocially::error() in /home/transact/public_html/lib/class.lib.php on line 91

What's with this Transact Socially anyway?
[HTC ChaCha] wdwray:
OK, I got the download to work, but the image won't install on my phone. Recovery says it can't find the system.img, cache.img, or data.img files. When I look at the extracted folder, it has system.yaffs2.img, data.yaffs2.img, and cache.yaffs2.img. This leads me to think my Recovery doesn't recognize .yaffs2 files and maybe I need a newer version of Recovery? Or is it something else?
[HTC ChaCha] elmanortega:
hey boss

how much would you charge to add the radio files and spanish to this?
[HTC ChaCha] jacknmary:
I guess the OP is no longer supporting?
[HTC ChaCha] celperf:
how to add spañish please ?
[HTC ChaCha] ladyhaly:
Can anyone host the file somewhere like MediaFire?
[HTC ChaCha] dront78:
Try to install morelocale from google play
[HTC ChaCha] NIK3SH:
Hello All,

Link provided by OP is not working at all,

Can some one please provide any mirror or anything else ?
[HTC ChaCha] CanYouSmell:
DOWNLOAD

here is the link without the ads websites

CLICK HERE
[HTC ChaCha] MrKaon:
Mirror:

chacha_stockrom_v2.rar (116.1 MB)
https://mega.co.nz/#!LcZUDQoI!IrOK3Ah9G0btatWpEW5e_C1Hb0xPBeOZ4kZqE3ZkZco
[HTC ChaCha] mislatero:
thi rom is good but no have spanish
[HTC ChaCha] antyhero:
Broken link, mb who have rom ???
[HTC ChaCha] emile1925:
does it support arabic
[Motorola Droid RAZR] zkvvoob:
Hi guys,

Last night I managed to upgrade to the leaked T-Mobile ICS ROM. Everything seems quite all right, in my opinion.

By today, when I tried running Samba Filesharing, I discovered that my PC could not connect to the phone. Tried ping-ing the RAZR - 100% loss of packets. Uninstalled Samba and reinstalled it - same thing.

Wifi connection seems to be working just fine, though, internet access and all.

Any ideas what might be causing this? Only yesterday, under Gingerbread, the phone and the PC interacted quite flawlessly.

Thanks!
[Motorola Droid RAZR] farhanito:
Are you sure the app itself can run on ics?

You probably should ask the developer
[Motorola Droid RAZR] zkvvoob:
I can't swear to it, but I have a distant feeling that on my Desire, running ICS, it worked just fine.

You're probably right, I'll contact the developer. But in the meantime, if anyone has other ideas - please share them. :)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] karthicvkn:
Hi All,

Is it possible that install windows 7 rom on neo ?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] mpiekp:
Very improbable.....:

Wm7 is proprietary closed software, even if you found one for similar hardware you wouldn't have the exact drivers, they would have to be written from scratch, which lets face it phones are obsolete within a year or two so can't really see anyone reverse engineering....

And before anyone mentions hd2 that was a windows phone that has android ported to it a completely different kettle of cats.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] karthicvkn:
Ok man, thanks a lot. what about iOS ?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] mpiekp:
Same answer for same reasons.....
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] specialistas4:
what about ubuntu?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] mpiekp:
That's been done search the forums
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] georgeiulian89:
WP7 on Xperia Neo is a waste of good hardware,because,excepting UI,WP 7 is much weaker platform than Android.Trust me,i've worked 1 week with a Lumia 710,and it was horrible.If you want WP7 UI,you can install Launcher 7 from Market,MILocker with WP7 theme,zune player,wp7 contacts,messaging 7 and wp7 email,and you'll have a complete wp7 ui,with Android OS. This is how my phone looks like http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1264324&page=26
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] karthicvkn:
Its ok, i just want clarify my question. I know we are on the better platform and i love it,

Thanks to all !!!
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] darkerm:
I wanted to know if we can port Windows 7.5 OS or symbian.

I know and I agree android is the net and that is why I am use Xperia Neo :D

Btw, symbian wasn't bad. I used more than 6 symbian phone ;)

I also have iPhone 3G but I gave it to my sister cuz ios is really pain in the neck. :mad:
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] gr8techie:
Totally agree with this... android is Open Source and hence can be worked on and ported to some devices.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] ssimmmo:
Yeap very different kettle of fish..mine sitting in my hand now with wm7. Bloody amazing phone really but just to old now for my liking ashame

Sent from my MT11i
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] elisir1998:
I don't think so!
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] abderian2004:
Thnks for the launcher 7 idea, i would try it if it feels the same. but i believe it wont have the same push mail service as wm7.:confused:
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] ps1quiKo:
I don't understand...

Why?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] armando101:
Because android is open source it can be ported to other devices... However wp7, iOS, symbian are not open source so they cannot be ported.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] elisir1998:
100%
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] iamrajeev:
i dont know why we r having this topic in 1st place
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] illanxr:
Pretty improbable to happen. WM7 is not open source, so you would need to spend a lot of time (and probably money too...)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] taicer01:
And just to remember that it is very difficult to a different system, such as the WP7 android on a device, fully functional, stable ... you will have many problems with incompatible ...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Gambler_3:
GSMArena did a display test on the galaxy S3 and it is much brighter at full brightness. Galaxy note is also much brighter so why is it that the nexus has such a dim HD SAMOLED screen?? Is it software based so people dont end up with terrible battery time??

I so so wish the nexus can have brighter screen, my biggest complaint with the phone.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] adrynalyne:
Probably better for Q &A, but AOSP and vanilla Google Android has always been overly aggressive about auto brightness and keeps it quite dim more often than not. It can, and is modified by OEMs and some custom roms.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] bazzawhite:
I'm not sure my screen is as dim as what other owners claim theirs to be. I have it on auto-brightness and I don't have an issue with bright outdoors or indoor. I'm not sure I'd like it to be any brighter than it already is.

Maybe I'm not used to having my screen burn a hole in my cornea.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Gambler_3:
I am talking about full manual brightness, auto brightness is never perfect on any phone but it actually isnt dim at all on my nexus S.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] adrynalyne:
Dunno. I am not about to go run to Best Buy and compare, but full on brightness on my phone is uncomfortably bright in the dark and dimly lit areas, and very visible in direct sunlight.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Gambler_3:
I tried the phone at a very brightly lit shop. Put the brightness to maximum manually and yet it was barely brighter than my nexus S at 50% brightness.

Brightness isnt a contest where every phone should try to beat others but it should be sufficient enough. I just think the nexus brightness isnt sufficient, it tops out at 200 nits when the minimum should be 300 nits for comfortable use in all environments.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] adrynalyne:
Maybe it is your phone then. I can tell you this device is easily as bright as my old Samsung Fascinate, which isn't much different from the Nexus S in screen tech.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Gambler_3:
GSMArena and anandtech tests also show the galaxy nexus is the dimmest screen you will find in any of the high end android phones. A test done here on xda also showed the same thing.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] adrynalyne:
Do you want a discussion, or do you want to discount what I am saying just to argue?

Don't ask for an opinion if you are just looking for a way to discount it.

Your sites cannot vouch for my experience.

If your phone can only match 50% of what the Nexus S can in brightness, there is something wrong with it. That or you are exaggerating. This is in my opinion, but I think it is a very valid point.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kgbeezr1:
The screen seems to be limited in brightness from the factory, as a matter of settings. Using AOKP Rom and increasing the color multipliers makes the screen much, much brighter, but i've read speculation that it could cause the screen to burn-in images much faster, which logically speaking, seems to make sense. Maybe it's limited by Samsung for that reason. This particular panel seems slightly more prone to image retention than the one on my Droid Charge, granted it isn't the same as burn-in, but maybe an indicator of inclination toward it...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Smokeey:
The GSIII probably gets 2 mins of battery life. A screen that bright on 4 Cortex A9's and 4 mali 400's at 32nm....the battery is going to SUCK.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Gambler_3:
I was not asking for opinions if the screen is dim or not but why is it. It wasnt my phone but a demo model at the shop. My experience showed me it was dim just like I had read in reviews.

I have an LCD nexus S, I am sure the AMOLED one at 50% wont be almost as bright as gnexus at 100. You know LCD's can get much brighter and the one on nexus S is particularly really bright.

I also compared galaxy nexus side by side with galaxy S2 and the difference was noticeable in brightness.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Gambler_3:
The GS3 is only 300 nits bright, it isnt anything out of the ordinary. The one X has 500 nits screen.

And nobody is forced to keep the screen on high brightness, it's just an option to have a really bright screen and a pretty good one at that.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kgbeezr1:
I thought of it when you mentioned the GS2 - I had that phone for a week when it was released on Sprint, and any time the screen brightness was turned up and the screen was on for a few minutes, it would overheat and the OS forced it to low brightness until it cooled. At the time it was an issue quite a few people seemed to be having, so maybe it's limited on the Nexus for temp reasons too. As Smokeey had mentioned, battery life could be a factor as well.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] zetsumeikuro:
Do you even OWN a GNex? I swear you're just here to troll the device.

Originally Posted by Gambler_3

I have a nexus S currently. <--- Yesterday's date.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Gambler_3:
Why cant I post if I dont have the device? I am thinking about upgrade from nexus S and I just made some threads about the potential issues I discovered about the device.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] eman3316@optonline.net:
As long as you can see the screen who cares how bright it is. Are you trying to light up a room with it? Also, keep your phone on full brightness and you will be highly risking screen burn in so I would not recommend keeping it on full anyway even if it is not as bright as other devices.

Why would anyone purchase a phone or not purchase a phone based on it being the brightest screen out there. I can understand if you couldn't see the screen, but really? And now with the ability to change the colors and gamma of the screen, it just looks great.

So if you get the Nexus and keep the screen turned all the way up because you needed to light up your house to save money on electricity, please don't start a thread complaining about burn in.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] msedek:
This >

And wtf? My eyes Hurt if I put full brightness.. And even if I try to read on direct sun i can do easy.. I use my phone on 25% brightness and thats enough
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] castaway1:
hehe, i bought googles flagship for 450€ and i need to care how long is screen on and i cant have it on full brightness all the time becouse i "risking screen burn"? :p
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Gambler_3:
Ah keep LCD phone on full brightness and deal with the terrible blacks. Keep an AMOLED phone on full brightness and deal with burn-in. A perfect world we do not live in. :(

On a serious note screen brightness matters most when going out in the sun obviously. It can never be too bright when you are out.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nodstuff:
I came from nexus s LCD version, my sister has sgs (amoled) and I now have a gnex (s-amoled HD)

OK so in terms of brightness there is little or no difference between the NS and the gnex at full brightness. (I just held them beside each other at full brightness)

The sgs is a little brighter but that's probably a placebo due to the colours of touchwiz.

Tbh it isn't something to cry and whine about, especially if you don't even have the phone.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] adrynalyne:
So...you think that has to do with the phone?

ANY amoled display has to worry about that.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] RogerPodacter:
How has no one mentioned the kernel code? There is a comment in our nexus kernel from Google that the purposely set the screen to 290 nits. They multiplied down by a small factor. And I think custom roms remove this.

But stock its set to 290 and honestly I find it very bright compared to my nexus one. About the same.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] castaway1:
i think noone need carry about it becouse we just dont use phones to full brightness all the time there is no reason for it.

I had Galaxy S (AMOLED) and yes status bar was burned into screen but i saw it only with "test app" with solid blue / red color there was burned statusbar with battery + time + signal bars into screen..but it did not matter at all.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] times_infinity:
You're comparing three different screen techs on three different devices and expecting identical result. Be realistic.
[Motorola Atrix 2] Ravikirancg:
Hey guys I recently messed up my phone and tried flashing the stock Indian rom ("5.5.1-EDEM-27-SEARET_cfc.xml.zip" which you get following http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1616305) using RSD Lite.

everything used to go well until it gets to flashing the grfs.img (it loads system.img and many others OK) - it always errors out.

so I edited the xml file and DELETED the part (instruction) to flash grfs.img..

(<step operation="flash" partition="webtop" filename="grfs.img" MD5="9081d7d3b36cca3ed88c9d8604a62a0d" />)

well this time it gave no errors and flashed everything smoothly... and everything I have tried (and use everyday) work without any errors...

Now, Since grfs.img is quite a huge file (1.3GB) I wanted to know what it contains and the features I won't have on my phone now...

If its just webtop and lapdock stuff that I wont have, its fine as I don't use them and don't have any plans of using them.. however if it affects the hdmi port.. I will have to include that file and try something else..
[Motorola Atrix 2] PhoenixNghi:
Did you flash an Indian fzx on your AT&T Atrix 2?
[Motorola Atrix 2] lkrasner:
just webtop
[Motorola Atrix 2] Ravikirancg:
Not exactly... Mine is an Indian atrix 2 and not AT&T.. (Bought and use it in India)
[Motorola Atrix 2] cogeary:
Yep, it's webtop.

Before you flashed the fxz, are you sure that you were on the retail Indian firmware? There's couple other firmwares in that same region that have different webtops, so you might have flashed a slightly different firmware. Everything should still work though.
[Motorola Atrix 2] Ravikirancg:
Ya.. Sure of that.. And every thing works perfectly..
[Motorola Atrix 2] lkrasner:
I always skip it to. it is huge and shouldn't ever get screwed up. I don't use it anyways, so who cares if it is gone or broken!
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Ari M.B.:
Hello everybody,

I am new to this forum (props to all for their contributions). I just wanted to know whether there is a chance that the Galaxy Players (I have a GP5) will have an official update to ICS ? I've looked everywhere (Samsung HP, google), I can't find any information about it.

Does anyone here knows anything ?

(Sorry, in case that I'm not in the right forum group)
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] theraf:
there is an ICS release in the development section, just look at the CM9 or AOKP threads, those roms are both ICS based.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] blcistheking:
Very unlikely that there will be an official ICS upgrade. Samsung is having a hard enough time updating their flagship devices like the Galaxy Note, and they've already said the original Galaxy S will not be getting ICS. The Galaxy Player 5.0 is essentially a 5 inch Galaxy S (same cpu/ram) so i doubt it will ever come.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] zilian28:
Yeah man... as the other users have said, no chance of original ICS for our player. I imagine even the new Galaxy Player plus won't receive it. I've been using android for a long time on many devices and android atualizations are a pain. Fortunately, we have XDA. =p
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] 1776:
There is nothing official from Samsung - though they have said that there is no room in ROM for ICS and Touch Wiz and Samsung seems to be intent on not losing Touch Wiz. Most would have no problem losing Touch Wiz and Samsung is making a wrong decision not to support these relatively new units with updates.

At this point if you want ICS you will have to rely upon a ROM from a site like this. The last thread that I saw here about the ICS ROM for the 5.0 was that it was still in development - there is a beta that is being troubleshooted as there were features that were not working yet.
[HTC One X] VanHelsing207:
Is it normal for HOX to heat up (quite a bit) very quickly when browsing web (Chrome beta)? It usually heats up near camera and on the opposite side. It also gets very hot on charging while using it (much less without usage). Doesn't seem to show performance issues though.

Thanks for your answers.
[HTC One X] Shempz:
From what I've heard, I think a lot of the innards are packed around the camera (and that probably means the cpu/gpu)....hence why it heats up when being used intensely.
[HTC One X] Forsaked:
It heats up if you are using the UMTS/HSDPA-Connection.

Try to surf with WLan or GSM and you will see that it wont heat up that much!
[HTC One X] VanHelsing207:
It happens when I'm on wifi. Maybe I can check the temperature somehow? Is there unwanted or critical temperature?
[HTC One X] VanHelsing207:
Quick update

The phone seems to heat up less with stock browser.

So far the more tabs/tasks are open the hotter it gets but why is it so hot from the browser?

Still I would like to know what are the temps to avoid?

Do your phones get very hot and in which circumstances?
[HTC One X] vegetaleb:
Flash a custom kernel then use Setcpu to downcloack the cPU if it crosses a certain temp
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DJNapalm:
I'm a bit confused on how to install the ROM. Can someone please help. When i try to install it fails the varication. Am I suppose to install it as a zip file?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] pkmoazzam:
Welcome to the note forums.

please read the whole guides.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1586223
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] hyukki:
Do not attempt to flash unless you understand everything, and I mean EVERYTHING about flashing process. Making nandroid backups, getting correct drivers, what to do when flashing fails, how to revert, what kernel, bootloader, rom, modems are, etc.

Just a tip.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] littlewierdo:
Yea, and additionally, ONLY INSTALL i717 roms. N7000 roms (international version of the Note) will cause problems and possibly perma brick your phone.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] kimtyson:
Most, if not all, of the threads with ROMs will have install instructions. Just follow the instructions supplied by the dev. It ain't rocket science, though some may try to tell you it is.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metalz007:
will we able to port sgs 3 official rom on sgs2 !!!:)
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] B3311:
Official ROM? Of course not. A modded ROM? Wait and see. Seems that much of the software changes can be ported - there are some posts about it somewhere. You can search for them.

More information, supposition, idle speculation and wild guesswork here.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Lady_Chloe:
Also, most features will probably use lots of battery, SGS 3 has a capacity of 2100,while SGS 2 has only 1650 mAh.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mirbeksm:
I am actually a little surprised, that developers do not publish custom ROMs in packages.For example, Kernel+drivers in one package, Dalvik VM in another, Core services in another, Samsung apps in another, Google Apps in another, and so on, with possibility to interchangeably use these packages. For example, you could get Kernel from one, core services and applications that provide Google Stock experience in another, and so on.

AFAIK SGSIII is going to be released on dual-core processors as well, so in terms of execution power, hardware should be able to handle SGSIII applications. It all comes down to compatibility of kernel and drivers.

Edit: Please replace exclamation mark (!) on thread title to question mark [?]. Title is misleading
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] deom2i:
Well, if this do them im gonna stick with SGII wont lose much.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Sergio60052:
it would be nice !
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] beston94:
Am I the only one who is confused on whether the OP actually is asking us whether there will be a rom or he is telling is there will be a rom? Same goes for the title.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Deleted member 4038153:
I think he saw SGS III, realised it's only one "I" different to the phone he has, then ended up with sticky underpants at the thought of it.

I suppose along the same logic, his phone is only one "I" different to an iPhone. Eagerly awaiting his ROM ports.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] beston94:
The sarcasm is strong within this post lol
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kage00:
bahahahaha! hahaha!:) LMAO!:)
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] android_isda_shit:
sry for bumping and old thread

but if what your saying is true oinkylicious

then our samsung galaxy S 2 is

better than the iphone 4 S times 2

becouse it is the S and we are the S 2

same goes with all other crappy logic we hear

here at xda
[HTC Sensation] TheUnreaL:
Hi to everyone,

I've noticed a little bug while using VI4.0.2 with default settings (SebastianFM v1.4.1 and Nova Launcher) on a HTC Sensation XE: just after I've unlocked the phone the every first gesture (tap or swipe) is always missed, I always need to tap or swipe a second time in order to get the gesture recognized by the phone. Is it happens to you too? How to fix it?
[HTC Sensation] TheUnreaL:
I've solved it, that was Fancy Widget blame, I activated the wheater animation after the unlock and the first touch was used in order to interrupt the animation. I disabled the animation and now it works. I'm sorry for the thread, bye
[T-Mobile myTouch 4G Slide] Coug76:
Check out development!

Alpha but it is still CM9! I will backup and flash tonight...

Hastily spouted for your befuddlement
[T-Mobile myTouch 4G Slide] strapped365:
Already on the download, i dont ever backup because my phone is never "running" long enough to backup, im always testing things out, right now i have an ICS theme project im working on for MikTouch so i randomly push apks ive edited many times so i ALWAYS need a full and fresh install. Also messing with a kernel for it to
[T-Mobile myTouch 4G Slide] AgentCherryColla:
This looks like I can cook up MIUI v4, or we can ask the MIUI.US Team.
[T-Mobile myTouch 4G Slide] Coug76:
I'm a nandroid junky. I keep 3-4 roms current in nandroid on my SD card.

Hastily spouted for your befuddlement
[T-Mobile myTouch 4G Slide] ac3theone:
This is a noob question but I'm very new to the whole cm thing, how often do "nightlys" update? Is it literally every night or is that just a cool name they want to call different versions of cm?