yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III General] alchemist316:
I mean really there will never stop being people who love there phones and hate on the biggest competition lol just about everyone getting the evo 3d was up in arms with Samsung people dropping benchmarks in htc forums lol .. point is both are great devices both have great cameras both are very fast so yea I admit if I'd gotten a one x I'd be here hating to lol its good to see both sides just enjoy the phones ...
[Galaxy S III General] anfozy:
its sad to see the ios fanboy mentality of taking a handful of bad reviews from the "faults bin" and parading it like gospel about a device on these forums, it really is terrible, one would hope that android users could rise above the sort of childish manner but i know that is asking for too much there will always be hate in this world. at the end of the day its android feuding with android come on guys, were both on the same sides and we've got 2 manufacturers going at it trying to make the best device albeit the hox has its faults, but who knows what the gsIII will bring it may have faults and it may not, i dont know i dont work for samsung

we should just be happy that we have a choice in the matter..

i mean look at the hardcore iphone users they're stubborn as hell and they dont even have a choice in flagship phones its either the latest iphone or nothing

just be glad we have manufacturers going head to head trying to out do each other unlike apple who are "heres a phone! be happy! we wont be releasing another one till the stars align"

so im really happy i have a hox it might be in the minority with no faults and a screen on time of 5+ hours

but when the gsIII arrives to my shores and i either get bored of the hox or get bitten by the android bug again and buy the gsIII ill be happy that i had a choice in phones

and yes the gsIII photos do look better than the one x, but it doesnt make me hate my hox i still love it, as i still love my gs2, and my gnex with its mediocre hardware specs and 5mp camera (maddd nerd-homo goin on)
[Galaxy S III General] android_master:
I spent almost a week with HTC One X,,hands down the best Android phone till date,,design & construction top notch and i have never seen a much brighter and vibrant screen{hands down the best screen i have ever seen}.

Now the camera part was even more interesting,, quality of pictures is very very good,I use Galaxy Note and One X has much better camera than that,One X is also better in lowlight,the washed out, grainy look the Note gives,there was nothing like that in One X.HTC has really up their game with their flagship,,a true flagship in every sense.
[Galaxy S III General] Daemos:
Lol...what?

Look again, the SGS2 resolves fine detail MUCH better than the SGS3, *sigh* can any one who understands photography please stop letting blind fanboyness take over?

I already commented on these pictures a few pages ago.

Oh yeah...aperture is important but it's only one factor, sensor size, sensor quality, level of crap/good post processing, lens quality...honestly it does no good to advertise just the aperture IMO,
[Galaxy S III General] Knight47:
It means

SAMSUNG GALAXY S 3>HTC one x

:D
[Galaxy S III General] bala_gamer:
unless it is proved wrong sgs3 is always better than hox, but some fanboys never accept it.
[Galaxy S III General] ph00ny:
Sensor and video encoding is better but there is really no way of getting around better optic setup

Aperture and quality of the optics is a huge plus to image quality.

Same reason why quality glasses are sometimes more expensive than the camera body itself on SLR
[Galaxy S III General] JupiterdroidXDA:
My eyes understands photography very well thank you and i totally stand by my original comment.

Its not fanboyism, its there for all to see...

So oh ye master photographer put a sock in it;) Cheers;)

Because you have commented on this pics is does not mean s$$t, all it means is you have offered an opinion, as i have.

To me the SGS3 photos are better than the SGS2 and HOX...

JD
[Galaxy S III General] ECrispy:
I bet most people will care more about the fact that phone has face tagging and sharing rather than some minute nitpicks about contrast and noise details. The pictures are 'good enough' for pretty much everyone. This is all speculation until final production units are reviewed anyway.
[Galaxy S III General] paintball23456:
to every One the s3 pics loook better:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::cool:
[Galaxy S III General] android_master:
The person saying that needs an eye check up:mad:,,One X is far far ahead,,low light performance is also top notch,,,better screen/design/camera hats of to the android phone of the year:D
[Galaxy S III General] SiNJiN76:
Well, one thing is for sure. Both phones take better pictures than my trusty old Canon PowerShot SD800 IS! Finally don't have to worry about finding the battery charger for that thing and wondering if the SD is empty before going out. :D I was also going to buy a Video Cam so I can take pictures while recording...but, now I can scratch that of the list also! :D:D

As a matter of fact...it's got better specs than the laptop I'm using right now!:eek:
[Galaxy S III General] :
Dude, you are talking as if you have used the SGS3 and compared it against HOX. Theoretically speaking I can also name a few advantages for SGS3. But, that's not the point.

Point is why are you trolling here?
[Galaxy S III General] paintball23456:
but it tegra 3....

its crap

and even if the screen is pentile its still better cos its amoled not shi*ty LCD2 made by a company that has a track record equivalent to piss look at the pics and vids you know the galaxy s3 is better yeah maybe low light performance is better but thats what a flash is for:D

but im gonna make the my sig if htc trolls keep trolling here your not welcome

have you had hands on the galaxy s3?

did you know that exynos is better than tegra 3? the galaxy s2 is on par with the one x in GPU and CPU performance

go troll on the htc one x forms
[Galaxy S III General] diehard2222:
A company that specializes in smartphone hardware will always make better phones than a company like HTC.

Its as simple as that. Gs3 will be android phone of the year but iPhone 5 will be overall top dog imo.

Hope I am wrong on that 1 though.
[Galaxy S III General] JupiterdroidXDA:
eBay is your best friend mate, Get that piece of Formosan ****e, list it up on ebay, you might get a £5er for it, then go and buy the real Android phone of the year;)

Cheers;)

JD
[Galaxy S III General] paintball23456:
hahahaha you just contradicted your self you said that a company that specializes in smartphone hardware makes better phones apple dont make there hardware;)

and your wrong the iphone 4s was thrashed by the s2 will be the same with the iphone 5 galaxy s3 will woop its ass red raw like the s2 did:D:D:D:D
[Galaxy S III General] SiNJiN76:
The iPhone? :confused: Oh, God...I almost had that erased from my memory banks! You bastards!!!:D:D
[Galaxy S III General] diehard2222:
No I said a company like HTC eg one that makes Android phones.

Apple is a whole other ball game.
[Galaxy S III General] paintball23456:
ahhhh apple fanboy:D:D:D:D:D:D
[Galaxy S III General] :
Eldar Murtazin twitted few shots taken from SGS3.

https://twitter.com/#!/eldarmurtazin/status/200867819569680384/photo/1/large

http://instagr.am/p/KetjNTwNb5/

https://twitter.com/#!/eldarmurtazin/status/200867640003149824/photo/1/large

I have twitted him to upload full resolution shots. Lets hope he acknowledges :)

EDIT: HE confirmed that they are going to publish few photos today in their website.

http://www.mobile-review.com
[Galaxy S III General] paintball23456:
these are nice
[Galaxy S III General] Arsaw:
Apple is a whole other ball game?

Are you coming from Mars? Iphone is also a smartphone dude....
[Galaxy S III General] paintball23456:
corrected it for you:D
[Galaxy S III General] boodies:
So another the review by gsm says Samsung wins in the picture quality dept for the most part.

and in regards to video

EDIT: Thanks Chicken Nuggets
[Galaxy S III General] Chicken Nugget(s):
I don't understand how you are so biased. The review also said 'One X crushed S3 in low light pictures and videos', so it's certainly not as clear cut as that.
[Galaxy S III General] EgFox:
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_iii_vs_htc_one_x-review-759.php
[Galaxy S III General] bbeelzebub:
Thanks for that! I wouldn't have seen it had you not linked it. This makes me feel a lot better knowing that the SG3 will more than likely be my next phone as my carrier won't be getting a high end HTC phone for a while and it's high time to replace my old HTC.
[Galaxy S III General] m33ts4k0z:
That's the only battle HOX won. If you are happy with that(While no flash was used), then wrong forum? :p
[Galaxy S III General] radeonxt:
yes he bashed the other poster for being biased so he says, when he only posted the only thing that hox won. lols

what a hypocrite.:D
[Galaxy S III General] paintball23456:
the performance of the HOX is on par with the s2 why do people love ****?
[Galaxy S III General] BarryH_GEG:
You and others have posted this before and it's wrong. Let me explain how graphics tests work. The SGS2 has a PPI of 218 and a 4.3" display. The One X has a PPI of 312 and a 4.7" display. The One X is pushing 40% more pixels than the SGS2. So if you want to compare graphics results subtract 40% from the SGS2's score to account for the difference in displays. Samsung's always done a much better job tuning the OS to their h/w and using h/w acceleration in their browsers so the lower scores for the One X (or any HTC device) aren't surprising. Test them both with Chrome Beta and you'd get a very different result.

This is from GSMArena explaining why a lower score for the One X over the One S means the One X actually has a better GPU.

"The 3D graphics department is handled by NVIDIA's own GeForce GPU. On the HD screen of the One X it did 47+ fps, while the Adreno 25 inside the One S does 60 fps but on a qHD display, which has just 33% fewer pixels. This means the ULP GeForce GPU does better than the Adreno 225 in terms of pure power."
[Galaxy S III General] samaxen:
Gsmarena reviews

Comparison of Photo and Video at GSMARENA

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_iii_vs_htc_one_x-review-759p5.php

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_iii_vs_htc_one_x-review-759p6.php
[Galaxy S III General] paintball23456:
that still doesn't stop tegra 3 sfom being crap
[Galaxy S III General] bimmerboii:
What a debate going on here. Thought only apple has extreme fanboy-ism... This thread proves me wrong
[Galaxy S III General] 1orka:
Did you guys actually check samples?

Don't pay attention to what they wrote, they probably tried not to offend Samsung, use your own eyes.

Zoom in

Samsung

http://www.gsmarena.com/showpic.php...camera/gsmarena_018.jpg&idReview=759&idPage=5

HTC

http://www.gsmarena.com/showpic.php...camera/gsmarena_021.jpg&idReview=759&idPage=5

Blue tint is visible all over Samsung pic, and that metal structure is less detailed than on HTC photos, and that is not low light conditions.

Also here

Samsung

http://www.gsmarena.com/showpic.php...camera/gsmarena_010.jpg&idReview=759&idPage=5

HTC

http://www.gsmarena.com/showpic.php...camera/gsmarena_012.jpg&idReview=759&idPage=5

Again, blue tint.

They tried to spin it, probably to make Samsung (which provided them with phone) feel better.

In good light, the two smartphones resolve about the same amount of detail here, but the One X has better contrast and it sharpens its images more aggressively, which makes its output look punchier. The Galaxy S III still has slightly better color reproduction, though.

"better color reproduction"? What an utter BS.

Also, what is this crap?

Samsung http://www.gsmarena.com/showpic.php...camera/gsmarena_014.jpg&idReview=759&idPage=5

HTC

http://www.gsmarena.com/showpic.php...camera/gsmarena_016.jpg&idReview=759&idPage=5

Samsung HDR

http://www.gsmarena.com/showpic.php...camera/gsmarena_015.jpg&idReview=759&idPage=5

HTC HDR

http://www.gsmarena.com/showpic.php...camera/gsmarena_017.jpg&idReview=759&idPage=5
[Galaxy S III General] pewpewbangbang:
There's always gonne be extreme fanboys from HTC and Samsung.......it's amazing how people don't look at the tests and facts and compare. Most of the fanboys don't even have the phones or have tested either of them.

Camera wise, straight and simple.

HOX

- Better camera hardware, ****ty software/bit-rate/compression

SGS3

- Not as good camera hardware, more mature and better software
[Galaxy S III General] Intratech:
Thing is though you can take a picture with the HOX camera whilst jumping out of an aeroplane and freefalling to earth at near terminal velocity... nobody has proven that the SGS III camera can do this as yet. The HOX wins that hands down.
[Galaxy S III General] Remix2011:
I mean dude just look at the crops the SGS3 does take better pictures,its almost a fact.

http://www.gsmarena.com/showpic.php.../crops/gsmarena_007.jpg&idReview=759&idPage=5

http://www.gsmarena.com/showpic.php.../crops/gsmarena_006.jpg&idReview=759&idPage=5

http://www.gsmarena.com/showpic.php.../crops/gsmarena_009.jpg&idReview=759&idPage=5

and this is a pre-production model of the SGS3.
[Galaxy S III General] Intratech:
But can it do that whilst you're falling out of a plane though? The HOX can.
[Galaxy S III General] natarau:
Wrong!

It does not matter if one of the displays is HD and one is only 480p, if the tests run at the same resolution. The GPU will struggle to run the same amount of pixels no matter how many pixels the screen has. It's all about how the apps graphics were designed, with 720p textures or not.
[Galaxy S III General] limeaid:
Everyone ahould read the above post. It pretty much sums ip everything.

The real question for me is whether or not htc is likely to update their imaging software to tone down the over processing of images. If they do this, it's likely that the one x photos will be better overall.
[Galaxy S III General] paintball23456:
fannnnnnnnboooooy alert!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---------- Post added at 11:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:52 PM ----------

big fanboy!:D :Dthe HOX is a piece of Taiwanese bull**** it lags at everything even typing on the keyboard
[Galaxy S III General] ph00ny:
Actually

Better camera optics for HOX and better camera sensor for SGS3

People seem to forget that camera is a two piece equipment

---------- Post added at 07:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:55 PM ----------

But SGS3 watches over you and orders food for you

wait food ordering is coming soon in SGS4
[Galaxy S III General] SiNJiN76:
So, which is preferred the most? a Better Optics or Better Sensor for a camera?
[Galaxy S III General] pewpewbangbang:
Optics....as long as the sensor is adequate which it is. Optics will make a bigger difference.

At least from experience with dslr's as I do photography as a hobby. An expensive lens will make a bigger difference than the dslr.

It's tough to determine though. As things like noise etc...are all with the sensor. It's just that the hox has a 2.0 aperture so it is what they say a faster lens and much better on lowlight.

In general tho, I'd still say camera hardware on hox is better but the software is just seriously lacking.
[Galaxy S III General] radeonxt:
oh and every phone owner on earth does that every day of their lives.

:D
[Galaxy S III General] paintball23456:
The HOX is **** in every way apart from the optics

send from my brain to your con :D
[Galaxy S III General] pewpewbangbang:
Posts like these are just dumb......
[Galaxy S III General] radeonxt:
any of you guys noticed this?

no one's discussing the video quality.

their silence is admittance their hox sux at taking videos even in good daylight conditions.

hox's vid 1080p and 720p was shallow bland boring dead compared to sgs3's vids.

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_iii_vs_htc_one_x-review-759p6.php

that's why they only keep discussing at points where their htc won and ignore the rest,

taking pictures on low light condition

and ta dahhh

design.

:D

btw, those features they say they can live without or as they say gimmicky will really seem to look like that at first. one good example is that vibrate when you pick up the phone in order to notify you of a missed missed call,text message email etc people are asking why is there a need for that when you already got the notification led for that?

the answer is there are also times that you won't be able to look at the phone's notification led like you are in the office and the phone's in your pocket you don't want to get caught trying to look at your cell. just pick it up if it doesn't vibrate then no missed whatever, if it does then there is a message,missed call,email waiting.

there's a vibrate for messages/calls you say? it's not everytime you will notice your phone vibrating because you can't be always consciously waiting for the phone to vibrate for incoming messages/calls thus you'll miss some of them.

in this case you are consciously picking up the phone.
[Galaxy S III General] pewpewbangbang:
Pretty sure talked about it. It falls into the category of the software being horrible on HTC part. It shoots video at a very low bit-rate from tests. There are devs looking into improving the cameras software side.

As said, the hardware is there the software isn't. Samsung excels in software as usual, they're one of the best at integrating s/w and h/w.

Not sure I'm understanding why your arguing about vibrating messages and stuff, didn't really read it tho.
[Galaxy S III General] SiNJiN76:
So, when we say Low Light...what is Low Light? My friend took some pics with his 4S at a club and it was pretty bad. Not how I thought it would turn out. (I couldn't take any photos with the S2 because I forgot to charge the battery and it was dead).
[Galaxy S III General] pewpewbangbang:
Club is super low light lol....idk anything would do well in it besides dslr with very high ISO and a fast lens or smartphones/point and shoots with flash.

Low light would be like the sun is setting and almost fully set or in a low lit room.

Hox should do better without flash.

True, all photos from smartphones go into facebook. But people like to know theirs are better or the best :rolleyes: human nature.

I use my dslr if I'm doing some real photography stuff, hox is good enough for point and shoot. Software still sucks though and its auto white balance is crap
[Galaxy S III General] 1orka:
Well, that's why asked if you actually checked samples, those crops don't match pictures they posted. See it for yourself, these building shots are before macro shots, Samsung in top raw, HTC bottom raw. You can also see how much better HDR mode on HTC is.

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_iii_vs_htc_one_x-review-759p5.php

Do you see pictures of that windmill? Starting from there all Samsung pictures suck in comparison to HTC, both daylight and low light.
[Galaxy S III General] m33ts4k0z:
The reviewers know better on that matter. The reason why the photos may be darker or lighter during the windmill test might be because of the shooters position. He might be blocking the light or allowing too much light to come in.

That's why the crops look different because these are actually more reliable.
[Galaxy S III General] chrisd1a1:
thread cleaned.

everyone please note the following

2. Member conduct.

2.1 Language: XDA is a worldwide community. As a result what is ‘ok’ to say in your part of the world may not be ok in someone else’s part of the world. Please think about who is reading what you write. Keep in mind that what you think of as acceptable use of language may not be acceptable to others. Conversely, while reading member posts, remember that word you find offensive may not be to the writer. Tolerance is a two way street.

2.2 Nudity: XDA is used by people of all ages, including minors. It's not acceptable to post nude/pornographic imagery, which includes exposure of the male or female genitalia or of female breasts.

2.3 Flaming: XDA was founded as a group of people sharing information about certain mobile phones. Sharing does not involve virtual yelling (flaming) it does involve working together to solve problems in an environment of mutual respect and understanding. Losing your temper and flaming another member, or group of members, is not acceptable behavior.

2.4 Personal attacks, racial, political and/or religious discussions: XDA is a discussion forum about certain mobile phones. Mobile phones are not racial, political, religious or personally offensive, therefore none of these types of discussions are permitted on XDA.

2.5 Courtesy towards other Members: Treat new members the way you would like to have been treated when you were a new member. When dealing with any member, provide them with guidance, advice and instruction when you can and always with respect and courtesy. Never post in a demanding, argumentative, disrespectful or self-righteous manner.

2.6 All members are expected to read and adhere to the XDA rules.

i've no issue with legitimate discussion but i won't tollerate flaming, trolling or abuse of any kind.

i will infract anyone who breaks the rules and this may result in bans

regards

Chris
[Galaxy S III General] JupiterdroidXDA:
Now the trolling has been finally moderated let get back to business discussing this amazing phone;)

JD

---------- Post added at 12:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:50 PM ----------

Agreed mate 100%
[Galaxy S III General] 1orka:
Crops are not taken by themselves, they must come from actual photo and for example that Galaxy S III crop here

http://www.gsmarena.com/showpic.php.../crops/gsmarena_007.jpg&idReview=759&idPage=5

does not belong to actual photo they provided, either they mixed it up with something else, or tried to fake it to make Samsung look better.

The reviewer is clearly biased, you can see how he tries to downplay Galaxy S III drawbacks and HTC's advantages, look at those macro shots, all of them cleary look better on HTC, yet reviewer claims Things are extremely close here with the two smartphones trading blows from shot to shot.

As for windmill test, that's their standart test for all phones i think it's done on stand and position is always same.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZyLHHxVX14&list=UUbLq9tsbo8peV22VxbDAfXA&index=204&feature=plcp

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf1hKYlZZ70&list=UUbLq9tsbo8peV22VxbDAfXA&index=205&feature=plcp

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2I2AYqJLLg&list=UUbLq9tsbo8peV22VxbDAfXA&index=9&feature=plcp

I didn' really trust GSMarena lately, now i lost any respect for them.
[Galaxy S III General] DJ Palmis:
At last: http://www.gsmarena.com/piccmp.php3?idType=3&idPhone1=4238&idPhone3=3598&idCamera2=30001

Sorry If it was posted before.. But I was looking forward for this test!!
[Galaxy S III General] m33ts4k0z:
Guys! Don't panic! Noone is trying to prove that GSG3 is the best! It simply is!

Here are the photos, just from the preview of the phone. Now we solved the "Hidden photos" mystery

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_iii-review-757p5.php

Watch these videos side by side. Just tap the tabs of your browser fast and see that the angles are different so are the conditions. The light coming from back and right is more to some and less to others of these videos.