yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III General] SlimJ87D:
Where the hell did I post anything about the yellow screen problem? Quit making **** up. Where the hell did I say anything was wrong with the battery life besides telling another user to get the device and I shared my battery experience? MY BATTERY EXPERIENCE.

Like here for instance, I pretty much pointed to you that you took a portion of my quote ignoring everything else I said, turned it into "Slim's bashing the One X's battery" when I was having a conversation with another user about my experiences. And then you follow up with 3 or 4 paragraphs that didn't mean jack **** about my experience or had any relevance to what I was talking about.

You're doing it again here. I didn't ask for your 1-8 list, I asked you why do you keep doing this? I get it, you like to try and show others your opinion. But the only way you can do it is by trying to grab their attention.
[Galaxy S III General] BarryH_GEG:
And have been thanked over 700 times for it. :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S III General] ErisDev:
Is it bad that when I first saw people complaining about the Pentile display, I first read that as "Penile"

Anyways, I honestly can tell why people are so violent against Pentile displays. The only phone that managed to mess that up (that I can remember) is the Droid Bionic.

My phone has a Pentile Display and honesly, I dont see any issues with it. Or is it one of those things where you need to put the screen right up against your Eye to see....cause im not doing that ****ake.
[Galaxy S III General] SlimJ87D:
Oh, that's awesome, 700 thanks?

I said that the screens are honestly personal preference and users may prefer one or the other. I prefer the type of contrast the SAMOLED provides over the sharpness the One X gives. Others the opposite. It's honestly up to how different people see things.

You pretty much lay it down as there is only one option and that is the one the does the best in all these microscopic test, light levels and color measurements. You proved your point, the One X does do better in most of those test. But those test don't represent the way others may see and use their devices.

I guess I'm not allowed to share my own experience of battery use with the One X as compared to my Captivate with similar use so far and for them to try the One X out because I haven't been thanked enough. I didn't know that. Thank you, let me hit the thanks button to give you another thanks.
[Galaxy S III General] m.zambonelli:
It amazed me, from the real begin, how people here speak a lot about "fashion" and less about "power".

I wanted an HOX, don't know why I still want it...but why I'll buy SGS3 instead of HOX?

1) You can change the battery...in future it'll be really usefull to get a more power one or just replace a too much used one (and with the phone lasting less then 1 day in full use you'll "ruin" the battery quite fast....1 year maybe...but not planning to change this monster so fast)

2) CPU! I was SO disappointed understanding that HOX CPU is more or less 20% less powerfull then the SGS3 one

Other things are more or less the same...but I want power (CPU) and lasting life (battery) so SGS3...even if the HOX still attract me so much!

SO DAMN MUCH!
[Galaxy S III General] webstar1:
Went from a galaxy s to the sensation and now back to gs3 :p. Seriously guys trust me just buy yourself a galaxy and save urself from dissapointment. I can't wait to get my hands on one!

Sent from my Sensation
[Galaxy S III General] Hunt3r.j2:
I think the reason why people thought it was so revolutionary was because it looked like nothing else on the market. Show me a single phone that really looks like the One X. Not just sharing a similar element, but having the same combination of elements.

If you want to see what looks like the SGS3, just take the T-Mobile SGS2, and make it shiny with a pebble-shaped home button.
[Galaxy S III General] SlimJ87D:
Yes Hunt3r.j2, I think most of us get the point already. You want to justify why you're happy with your One X so you wont' have buyers remorse. But for some reason it irritates you that other people want another phone because they feel like it's superior so you need to spend hours on end trying to justify your opinion more, more and more.

But at this point it's quite pathetic now. You came here to try and prove a point that we all know already, that the HTC One X's screen is the best on the market according to test.

I would understand why you're so passionate to convince others that the SLCD-2 is that much better but it honestly is not. It has it's pros and along with the pros there are cons. Your logic, reasoning and purpose in this thread would make more sense if there was absolutely no cons to using a SLCD-2 or like there are no cons to using the HTC One X.

It's like you're trying to convince people whose favorite ice cream is chocolate to like vanilla more, that's how pathetic its become.

"Great, then get the GS3. Why are you so focused on justifying your choice if you're getting exactly what you wanted?"

Why don't you take your own advise and go back to the One X forum instead of justifying why you'd rather have a One X or go ahead and keep wasting your time preaching others that the HTC One X's screen should be the reason why they should drop all the other features they like in the SGS3.
[Galaxy S III General] Hunt3r.j2:
This is hilarious, because I don't own any of these phones, I just read about them.

Nice try though, it's a shame that you're wrong about your assumptions. I'm not here to justify the One X being better than the SGS3. It isn't. This is by no means a clear-cut fight like it is with the Sensation and SGS2. I just hate it when people claim that the SGS3 has a better screen because "OMG PRETTY COLORS AND THE BLACKS ARE SO BLACK HURR", because it isn't. There are clear merits to the One X, and clear merits to the SGS3. The entire thread is filled with people whiteknighting for Samsung because they failed to up the hardware enough and put it in a package that at least looks like they tried to make it look decent. If Samsung didn't trip up, this thread wouldn't exist and HTC would be a distant afterthough.

If the GS3 had S-LCD2 I'd probably contemplate buying it.

I do have a Desire HD, but I'm rather indifferent to it, the battery is sadly small, the screen is just passable, GPS is broken. I suppose the industrial design is nice though.
[Galaxy S III General] SlimJ87D:
Hey look everyone! Hitlers back! Only this time if you don't like the same phone as he does then he'll try and troll you to death.

Oh no! Maybe this time if we ignore him he'll go away instead of trolling on Poland.

-Sent from my AT&T HTC One X
[Galaxy S III General] CoNsPiRiSiZe:
Mod cleanup, anyone?

---

To each their own.
[Galaxy S III General] Hunt3r.j2:
I've never quite expected Godwin's Law to be invoked on xda, but there's a first time for everything....

Anyways, for those who care, here's a nice link showing why peak brightness really does matter for outdoor visibility: http://www.displaymate.com/Mobile_Brightness_ShootOut_2.htm

There's some very good photos for showing the washout effects. S-LCD2 likely has lower reflectance compared to iPhone 4's IPS display, and the higher contrast might help too.

---------- Post added at 06:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:06 PM ----------

Perhaps, but some posts made shouldn't be removed because there's good information worth reading.
[Galaxy S III General] teiglin:
There's a reason it's Godwin's Law and not Godwin's Suggestion or something. The ridiculousness of humanity is predictable. :rolleyes:

Personally I haven't had any trouble viewing any of my AMOLED displays in sunlight; I think the high contrast is the clincher there. Still, the higher brightness of the One X's LCD2 probably does make it better for viewing outside. All that said, I also live in the Pacific Northwest where sunlight is something that mostly happens through a filter of clouds, so it's not even among my primary concerns, personally.
[Galaxy S III General] axne1:
Android is for everyone. It's really not intended to compete with Android... More like competition against Apple, Wp7 ect. I am starting to see so many haters on here it is sick. I for one am pretty much not surprised by any smartphone today. They are all starting to look the same anyway. Just look in any thread titled" What's Next For Android?"

sent from a Android device :)

I'm always on!
[Galaxy S III General] quattro_rs:
why are you Hox owners doing here anyway?
[Galaxy S III General] SiNJiN76:
Thanks for this info. I was up in the air about the camera, because of the f stop...but since you say that other factors (such as the BSI) make a difference...I'm back on board!

I also saw a demo...where you touch and hold the screen (from the lockscreen) and rotate the phone into landscape. It opens up the Camera. :eek:
[Galaxy S III General] Hunt3r.j2:
I own neither device. I am simply saying that based upon the evidence I've seen, the One X may be a better device. However, the GS3 has many things that it will likely either do better than the One X, or the One X simply doesn't have.

MicroSD and removable battery are the big ones. Exynos should have better performance, but I'm currently unsure about it's perceived smoothness compared to Tegra 3 and Snapdragon S4. This is by no means the obvious win that it was against Snapdragon S3.
[Galaxy S III General] Hunt3r.j2:
Sorry to rain on the parade, but BSI is almost universal for camera sensors.

I'm guessing that with good lighting, GS3's camera will be very good, but in low light conditions there will probably be more noise.

---------- Post added at 07:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:09 PM ----------
[Galaxy S III General] SiNJiN76:
Awe Damn! You did rain on my parade! :mad: hahaha Maybe for the better! :D (I'm on T-Mobile, so no HOX for me) Now...should I cross my fingers for the next Nexus? Which is rumored to be made by Samsung. :confused:
[Galaxy S III General] sat_cse28:
thanks foe info
[Galaxy S III General] Hunt3r.j2:
We will simply have to see how things go. Maybe Samsung did something special with the new sensor so it doesn't need as much light.

I think that if you can afford to wait, hold on to your existing phone. I think next year Cortex A15 will make a big jump, Samsung will hopefully learn from this launch and pull another SGS2 out of it's hat, and HTC stays on their toes and learns from the backlash to fix all the mistakes in the One series.
[Galaxy S III General] bala_gamer:
Defending their purchase !!! :D
[Galaxy S III General] BarryH_GEG:
Be kind of a one sided conversation in a thread entitled "Samsung Disappoints & HTC Steals The Show!," no? JK, a couple of us are getting both and then deciding between them. A thread similar to this ran in the SGS2 forum before both it and the Sensation launched with similar heated comparisons. It died pretty quickly because once the phones came out there really wasn't a comparison as HTC clearly undershot the target. Time will tell if history repeats itself. ;)

BTW, the thread title's a little dramatic on both counts - Samsung's level of "disappointment" is overblown as is the reality of HTC "stealing the show."
[Galaxy S III General] BarryH_GEG:
This makes you the smartest person here. Every device that comes out suffers from early build issues and needs at least three updates to be as it's intended to be. Everyone wants to be first and then scream like Chinese tree monkeys when the inevitable issues occur. First wave purchasers have literaly become the last stage in the testing process.
[Galaxy S III General] tbong777:
I leaned my lesson with the Nokia N97....LOL The captivate had a few issues but that was my first android and the developers fixed many of the issues. But I appreciate the early adopters. No company can beta test a device like thousands of excited new users. I usually pick up the "disappointments" used. Both my wife's and my SGS IIs were bought used as well as my Note bought on this site. saved enough to buy the SGS 3 LOL But I will wait...Maybe the rumor mill will begin on the Note II.

Regarding your earlier post

---------- Post added at 01:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:43 AM ----------

LOL Ya think? With how different these two devices are , I cannot see how anyone would have to buy both to decide which they would prefer. you want great colors, design, and Apple like hardware....you buy the HTC

You want an open device, a little speedier perhaps, the option for an SD card and replaceable batteries and are willing to live with the "terrible" colors and "fugly design" you buy the Samsung.

No two devices could be so different..........
[Galaxy S III General] Toss3:
Brightness does not always equal better sunlight legibility as per this test.

The Super AMOLED screen of the original SGS even outperformed the iPhone 4 in that test.

The colors I agree are always a bit off on Samsung's handsets, but that is usually fixed by a developer on these forums(supercurio).

Who cares about the "huge" battery drain of the screen when the phone itself will most likely perform better in the battery department than the HTC One X(which won't be a huge undertaking based on the reviews of the One X)?

How can you even say that only having seen photos? Also beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.

The CPU and GPU are both genuinely faster than those of the HTC One X. Just take a look here and here. The browser performance is also leaps and bounds better on the Samsung Galaxy S3.

How is the screen a massive disappointment? Pentile aside, it is still one of the best screens out there and absolutely great for multimedia enjoyment.

As an XDAr you might want to learn a bit about theming. There are going to be a lot of themes for the SGS3 for those whom do not like the stock touchwiz look.

How is the phone not better? There are only three things that I could see being better on the HTC One X and those are dependent on personal taste more than anything: S-LCD 2, Camera(remains to be seen) and looks.

Huge negatives for the HTC One X include no replaceable battery/short battery life, no MicroSD card support and bad audio quality.

The Samsung Galaxy S3 has slightly better hardware(in terms of CPU/GPU performance), much better codec support, most likely better audio quality(remains to be seen), much better browser, much more fluid interface(TouchWiz has always been one of the smoothest launchers on Android), better screen for multimedia content, better and more intuitive software(all of the software gimmicks samsung showed off at the launch), larger battery, ExFat support for 64Gb MicroSDXC cards and is most likely much more durable.

Again with the battery, you seem to be forgetting that the Samsung Galaxy S3 comes with an upgradable 2100mAH battery while the HTC One X is stuck with 1800mAh. The burn-in issues is in my opinion hugely overstated as I have yet to run into the issue having used my SGS2 for over a year now, and the original Samsung Galaxy S for almost a year before that.

No amoled screen has crap outdoor visibility and that is a fact.
[Galaxy S III General] tbong777:
BTW you are responding to Hunt3r.j2 post. As was I. I completely agree with you.
[Galaxy S III General] Toss3:
Oh, sorry, got you guys mixed up. :o
[Galaxy S III General] robbiekhan:
People still waffling on I see.

Anyway, the GSMArena full preview that came out yesterday proves several points and erases any doubt that the S3 is a proper superphone.

Sure, some might not like the hyperglaze casing but beyond that we have a phone that has a best in class camera, best in class performance (no lag anywhere when doing anything), best in class screen, best in class featureset and best of all it seems Samsung have put in various tweaks and mods we have grown to love on AOKP/AOSP and custom stock ROMs from XDA over the past year (scrollable noti toggles, gestures, lockscreen widgets/actions, battery % and other customisations).

The gsmarena 1080p samples have incredible detail as well and there is no zoom in when selecting 1080p like you get on the s2.

Absolutely brilliant and IMO a true upgrade to the S2. And side by side I think the S3 looks more modern and stylish although on its own or next to other phones, the S2 looks pro.
[Galaxy S III General] bluebobx:
O/T: learning gestures.

I know I'm off topic - but if Sammy have put in non-ICS standard gestures (and other capabilities) into the S3, then how is the user going to be shown these - video, online manual, what?

For example - I was watching AAA#59 this week and the review of the HOK had some kind of two finger "explode" action that seemed to be another way to bring up a list of running apps. Yes, I know that probably down to Sense, but the principal still holds for TouchWiz (damn, that's STILL a stupid name!).

Is the latest version of TouchWiz any more, or less, easy to learn than the HOX's version of Sense? I'm asking the question because this might be a factor for some in deciding between S3 and HOX - two otherwise pretty evenly matched devices imvho!
[Galaxy S III General] Toss3:
The camera in the SGS3 is definitely not best in class based on the shots provided by gsmarena. Fully agree with your other points though!
[Galaxy S III General] robbiekhan:
I imagine the same way they did for "Motion" on the S2, a dialogue pops up when you first use an app or action that could benefit from using that gesture.

I'm sure there will be other ways too like online materials, adverts and so on.

---------- Post added at 09:56 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:52 AM ----------

I think it is:

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_iii-review-757p5.php

More testing is needed but going by the current trend whereby actual users end up taking better pics than reviewers (as evidenced by the Best Photos from GS2 thread), I imagine the S3 will follow a similar trend as well.

The camcorder can't be beat by any other Android phone out now though.
[Galaxy S III General] camspy:
Since we have so many HOX owners/lovers who come here to bash SGS3 and the people who are going to own one, i guess we need some ambassadors from SGS3 forums side who could come to HOX forums to bash HOX :)
[Galaxy S III General] robbiekhan:
No,

We don't lower our standards to that level.
[Galaxy S III General] nedooo:
Just need to be objective S2 can be ****:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=21360725&postcount=1
[Galaxy S III General] Crash*N*Burn:
Nice Charts

Kinda hard to tell how good the SGIII is until the US version is launched.
[Galaxy S III General] leftheodo:
Why people can't get along? I have a sensation, which I love and I'm buying a SGS 3. Not because it is a better phone than the ONE X. I actually love the ONE X's design and screen ( much better than the gs3 IMHO ) and I've only owned HTC phones so far. I also love HTC Sense but I would like to try Samsung for a change as the GS3 seems as a great phone. HTC and Samsung are the best Android OEMs atm and their 2012 flagships are the best smartphones in the market without a doubt. So lets not act like iSheeps people. This community is losing its character since the gs2 and sensation release last year...
[Galaxy S III General] axne1:
Gs3 EXPLAINED!!!!! Hope this helps this spirited debate!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBSp1j5tPyU&feature=youtube_gdata_player

sent from a Android device :)

I'm always on!
[Galaxy S III General] bala_gamer:
do quote a small portion of the post next time, quoting the whole OP is not good for readers

---------- Post added at 06:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:48 PM ----------

awesome video bro!! though its already explained in many blogs the visual representation is much better
[Galaxy S III General] tbong777:
I don't think many diehard (I'm included) Samsung users care to want to go there. As soon as I saw no battery or an SD card slot I lost complete interest in pursuing any more information regarding the HTC . Too "iPhone" wannabe for me.
[Galaxy S III General] Unconn:
I never post to flame, and I am not now, but I just could not let this one go by...

'HTC... Too "iPhone" wannabe for me.' That is too funny coming from a Samsung forum. You ever see a SGS(1) next to an iPhone? ;-)
[Galaxy S III General] tbong777:
I have no issue with being a fanboy of a great Company as long as they continue to put out great technology. I was a Nokia fanboy until they decided to go Win. I had all the Ns lol and defended them as well. The N 95 /82 were great phones The N97 was issue laden but I still defended it until I played with an Android based OS. If Nokia would have gone Google, I probably would not have gone.

The only "sheeple" I see is HTC becoming the Iphone hardwarewise. With these devices for me removal/replaceable battery is a must. If only sometimes to reboot a frozen phone after flashing or making bad settings in voltage control freezing the ROM.

The SD card eliminates having to use the cloud for everything saving data and not needing a strong wireless signal everywhere to use your own data. Both are great options to half and deal breakers for me if they're not present.
[Galaxy S III General] tbong777:
Design is one thing . IPhone owns the designs of these phones . But No SD card. Locked in battery and for me THAT is iPhone all the way to the bank. If you're going to seal it at least make it waterproof. Lol
[Galaxy S III General] Marlinn:
@topicstarter

You do not know:

- What it looks like in real life

- The battery life

- The screen quality

- How the UI will feel

In short, you base your arguments on 5 minute hands on video's, comparing it to a phone that has been thoroughly reviewed with pro's and cons. Why not wait for the real reviews, and then make.. Well.. Rage posts..
[Galaxy S III General] jimbo.levy:
Samsung make the A5 chip that goes in the iPhone.
[Galaxy S III General] bubigrega:
I can see you dont know much about android...

Just hold power button for 10 to 15 sec on non battery replaceable Android devices. There are many, even Samsung makes some...

You can still use 32gb of your data on HOX. And you can't scrue your phone or camera performance with slow or faulty SD card. And in case of HOX vs SGS3 there is no need for installing drivers on your PC to access data on your data on phone through USB cable. Yes HTC still uses disk drive mode.

You are a fanboy...
[Galaxy S III General] Mopral:
I do not understand this big fight...

For me, none of Samsung or HTC "steals the show": they both delivered their vision of an high end device

Both phones have pretty high performance and each of us will choose one of them only on personal preference
[Galaxy S III General] tbong777:
I don't know anything about non-battery replaceable devices. I would not own own one as long as I have a choice

I admit to being a fanboy. Fanboy of replaceable batteries . Fanboy of 64 GB onboard SD storage plus whatever Samsung puts on their devices . It's nice to finally be able to sync an entire music/ media library without having to cherry pick or pay for excess cloud storage.

I look forward to a 100GB of storage capacity on these devices.

Having a replaceable battery is fundamental to using the device without worrying about what you're using, how long are using It. whats running in the BG, how often an app updates, turning wifi off with screen off, Turning GPS and BT off, Setting the screen on max brightness in the day time .

There's simply no need to ration any use, any time with batteries on hand and with access to ALL of my own data anywhere with or without a wireless signal........ Yeah I am a fanboy ..... I'll accept that.

BTW.....YOU can access data on any PC using MTP. Don't need Samsung drivers to do that . I can see you don't know much about your own SGS II!!