yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC One X] Obispal:
Hi guys, I got a one X about 2 weeks ago, after the 1.28 update my phone stopped recognising when I plug headphones in, this happens with all my headphones including the pack in ones. If I reboot the phone with the headphones plugged in they will work fine, if they are working and I unplug them to use the speaker the phone thinks they are still plugged in.

I have tried it on stock 1.28 and 1.29 and ARHD 5.1.0 and I'm having the same issues.
[HTC One X] deanfarnaby:
Stock T-Mobile 1.28 (update yesterday)

No issues here , on both 1.26 and 1.28.

Keep you ear to the ground - If it's not a widespread issue I would get a replacement.
[XPERIA X8 General] alexanter the great:
i had root the divice and try to install recovery to flash a cm9 rom.i install the xrecovery and i boot to the recovery menu.i wipe chace-davlik-factory reset and flash the rom.the phone stuck in sony ericsson logo and it not boot to xrecovery again.l am sorry i dont now much..
[XPERIA X8 General] Mayank77:
Firstly , you encountered a soft brick. Use PCC , and click repair phone to get back to stock eclair. Then you have to root all over again. If PCC fails (it won't) use SEUS.

Secondly , CM9 is for NaA kernel. Read in the thread where you downloaded , it mentions only for NaA kernel. You have stock kernel until you have unlocked your bootloader. CM9 which you flashed is NOT for stock kernel.

Check the compatibility of the ROM with stock kernel before flashing a ROM.

The compatible kernels are usually mentioned in the first few posts of the thread. If not mentioned , ask about compatibility in the thread

Thirdly , you should have posted this in the "Q&A section" and NOT the "General Section". Take care next time please :) :) :)
[XPERIA X8 General] alexanter the great:
ok!what is that PCC?sony ericsson program?and is so simple click and restore?
[XPERIA X8 General] Mayank77:
pcc is pc companion.

Software by Sony Ericsson.

Do not connect your phone.

Click on update phone/software.

It will not detect your phone (since it is not connected to the computer yet)

Then it will give a repair phone option.

Click on it , and it will guide you on how to connect your phone and restore back to 2.1
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kuljit55:
Hi guys, i have moved to revolution 4.0 rom from cm7 and i miss the built in power menu screenshot feature, i was wondering if anyone has the app from cm7 or MIUI?

I know there a few apps on the market but i have tried them all and dont like them. I'm looking for one which works by pressing hard key buttons like it does on cm7 and MIUI ones. If someone has something similar please post for me.

Thanks
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MatDrOiD:
Which hardbutton-combinations did you try? In Runnymede it's Power + Home.
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kuljit55:
Im not sure which combination would work, i have tried: Power + home, Menu + volume but nothing seems to happen. any ideas? cheers
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MatDrOiD:
Searched the ROM's thread?
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kuljit55:
Yep i did, couldnt find anything related. Any other ideas?
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jmcclue:
Its hold menu then vol down. (dont press both buttons exactly at the same time, menu first then straight after vol down)

Sent from my HTC Desire
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] akhillad:
try shoot it...

its an app...

Apk in attachments...
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kuljit55:
I have tried this but nothing seems to happen, do you usually get an notification when the screenshot is captured and where does the screeshot image be located at? also have you tried this on revolution 4.0 rom yourself? thanks
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jmcclue:
Just a normal camera sound and they should be saved in ur gallery. If not use root explorer or something simular to look for a miui file on ur sdcard. Never tried revolution, sorry.

Edit.. i had a look there and u cant take screenshots with revolution v4.0 sorry

Sent from my HTC Desire
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chapas:
I'm not sure if the battery or USB board is damaged, but the phone does not charge.

Can someone please check and confirm the voltage values of contacts on the phone with the charger connected to mains plug (without the battery). Please compare with my picture. And post your values.

http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/1069/gs2voltage.png

Thanks
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Muikkuman:
My desire HD is completely stock except I got s-off and root. Would I be able to accept the OTA update

If I unroot but keep s-off?
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Reinaldo33897:
If you unroot you lose s off. Once rooted you are NOT suppose to accept OTAs or you will be back for more help.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] shad0wboss:
There's no point in S-off if you're going to stay on stock.

If your phone is rooted only, then i think you can receive OTA
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Muikkuman:
Thank you for your answers, well I was thinking about doing the OTA when it arrives as there aren't any good ICS roms for the moment.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Muikkuman:
And I'm on stock Rom now, was on android revolution HD.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Reinaldo33897:
Once the OTA ICS rom is released for the DHD the devs will have the source codes and drivers to make their custom roms flawless the very next day or even the same date as the release. So its pointless, either way you have to wait for the ICS release whether for custom rom ICS or stock ICS rom.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Muikkuman:
Ye you right, the custom roms are often better.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] glevitan:
Just one thing, if you unroot, you don't lose S-OFF, you just lose root access. You have to revert the S-OFF by flashing a bootloader with a S-ON partition. If you are thinking to root again once the OTA is rolled, the just hold until custom roms are ready....I guess we are going to have much too fin...:D
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] shad0wboss:
It is true that none of the ICS rom is stable enough for everyday use (specially the sense 4 ones) but once the official RUU is leaked. Then we would have custom ICS sense roms and not only that but sense 4 instead of official sense 3.6.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Muikkuman:
Are Desire HD only getting sence 3.6? lol then it will be worth to wait and flash a custom Rom with sence 4.0 instead.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TommUK:
Or just buy from the HTC one Series :p DHD development is almost dead.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Muikkuman:
Yeah, but was thinking about staying with my Desire HD for at least one more year before buying a new one as I bought it February last year so It's only a little more than a year old.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Hunt3r.j2:
I'd expect Sense 4A to be fully working once kernel source for ICS is released, and from there we can probably get a few more features added.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Muikkuman:
Won't the developers be able to port the full sence 4.0?
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Muikkuman:
You can accept OTA with S-OFF as long you are on stock Rom with stock recovery and stock cid (not supercid).
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GuyInTheCorner:
Utter bull, ICS builds are stable, only some features not working e.g. Camera or WiFi Hotspot. Used IceCold as a daily for three weeks and loved it! Never tried a Sense ICS port though (I rooted to get rid of the P.O.S, not flash it again)

Sent from my Desire HD using Swype beta for Android!
[Galaxy S III General] Master05:
Very interesting analysis :cool:

Especially for all those guys who mock the phone whenever they can.
[Galaxy S III General] furt890:
I kinda disagree with the RAM argument, considering smartphone nowadays can be compared to a computer, there's no such thing as too much RAM but for other things, I have no complain.

There's just too much haters, either they secretly wants this but have bought other phone so they need to reassure themselves, really arguing just because they can, or plain trolling.
[Galaxy S III General] TheUnkn0wn:
1GB RAM is more than enough. Watch this

HTC One X with its 1GB RAM (same as the Samsung Galaxy SIII)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeMuzSQUdTg

He loads a whole range of memory hungry games without closing their tasks (meaning they will be still loaded in the RAM).
[Galaxy S III General] funb0b:
Can the title be changed to SIII please
[Galaxy S III General] harise100:
The video shows another aspect Samsung designed good in my opinion. When you look at the 1x screen you can see these 3 little dots there for a menu key.

It not just decreases the screen slightly, I can also see myself accidently clicking on while I'm playing.

In short: I love the hardware menu key!
[Galaxy S III General] intruda119:
The new fad at the moment is to hate. If the screen size was same as the note, i would pick it up day 1.
[Galaxy S III General] jwzspongii:
Yeah ur saying right !
[Galaxy S III General] touness69:
Nice analysis !

Can't agree more ! :D

All the trolls => garbage
[Galaxy S III General] rd_nest:
Haters gonna hate!

True..

I also did a comparison between HTC One X and SGS3, similar to what OP did here.

You can find it here.
[Galaxy S III General] TheUnkn0wn:
Yes, just a small typo there lol
[Galaxy S III General] tjtj4444:
First, I should start by saying that I like SGS3 :)

In your analysis you're mixing physical design (32nm vs 40/45nm) and logical design (Cortex A9 vs A15). All cortex A15 SOC's will be made with 32nm or better (e g 28nm), so there won't be any advantage for 4412 in this regard.

The purpose with Cortex A15 is to increase performance (but of course with decent power efficiency). So Cortex A15 is much better than Cortex A9 if you like performance, there is nothing Samsung have made with Exynos 4412 that makes it come closer to A15 performance wise. But in certain benchmarks a quad-core A9 will beat a dual core A15 though.

But A15 will not reach the market before Q3, maybe later, so it was never even close to get into SGS3 anyway.
[Galaxy S III General] poppy9009:
Agree.
[Galaxy S III General] jonny68:
+1

agree with everything the OP said.

Trolls and haters, no one is forcing you to stay here, you've had your rant now go away and leave those of us who are looking forward to this phone too it.
[Galaxy S III General] tbong777:
Very nice analysis. People knee jerked their reaction because their OWN expectations were not met. Samsung did not really hype this device. They did what they always do at launch.

The first thing people did not like was the "look" and in my opinion only, kind of silly for a mobile phone device. To fret about it as if it's something one actually "wears" and further indicates a reflection who one is as a person, in as if a self described "ugly phone" means ugly person to another who accidently sees the offending device But some people are fashion conscious all the way to their cell phones I suppose.

We then find out the form was intended purposely to avoid Apple lawsuits which at the end of the day cost Samsung money in time and personnel whose time can be better spent in the R &D labs coming up with non Apple FUNCTIONS. Like hot swappable SD Cards and batteries. Something Apple (and perhaps now even HTC) will NEVER have.

The phone is better then the SGS II...Better than the Note (except for screen size if that matters). The "form fighters" are the most likely to have purchased and the most disappointed and will eventually realize they have to get on board because many cannot stand they may not have the latest and greatest.

The HTC One X buyers will realized they jumped too soon and the SGS III is indeed the better phone....."Form" and a pentile screen is not enough of a rationalization to overcome their disappointment at not waiting just a little longer.

Their only hope for redemption is when the masses start the real beta test of the SGS III glaring issues start popping up ala the Captivate.
[Galaxy S III General] Aja82:
Thank you for a great constructive post without fanboism ;)

I just have a couple of things to say about the Tegra 3 part.

The so called "companion core" is not just for "idling" It's for taking care of the "easy" not so demanding tasks as well such as when are reading you're mails, watching you're pictures, looking on amovie and such.

The great part about that is that the "companion core" is really power efficiant and does'nt need to stress any other core to do the easy tasks.

The other cores work individually dependent on the workload as well.

And why would an CPU do multithreading when idling? Is'nt idling just...idling? ;)

What I want to say is that the Tegras 4 cores behaves just as the exynos 4 cores (if I've done my homework) with the exception that the Tegra has an helper core on top of this.

That being said the Tegra 3 also works @ 1.4ghz when in quad mode. The 1.5ghz part is for single core use as I understand it.

I think the exynos will be an awsome processor though. Im not saying anything else. Just updating som facts ;)
[Galaxy S III General] TheUnkn0wn:
Even though the phone is in idle there are still threads running, since there are still threads running it can therefore distribute the threads amongst its four cores.

I do like the idea of the companion core to help reduce battery usage, but I know that Android can lower the clock rate of the processor dynamically to work load which would effectively present the same outcome (reduced battery usage).
[Galaxy S III General] King Shady:
I laughed at the screen analysis. LCD2 smokes Super Amoled HD. Bit of a biased analysis here... also you fail to recognize that the GSIII's design is horrid. The reason I am so pissed at Samsung is because I've been a GSII user ever since it came out, paid the premium price for it, and its been the best smartphone I've EVER owned. Samsung hyped up the design for the III so much, and they hyped up the whole event with their "sheep" teaser. I'll be a glad owner of a One X, when it comes to AT&T on Sunday.
[Galaxy S III General] Mazzstrikers:
S3 is great hardware wise, but the pentile display REALLY IS THE ****. And no bias at all, this is coming from someone who has used a galaxy nexus previously, with the same screen technology and an even slightly higher pixel density if you want to be precise.

Pentile screens have a distinct grid and fuzziness no matter how pixel dense it is. And if you'd think at the nominal viewing distance (about 30 cm), you can't see the fuzziness you'd be really disillusioned. And AMOLEDs pentile or not have this problem, at low brightness levels solid colours, especially grey, causes you to see distinct vertical banding and also extreme fuzziness that makes the screen look like sandpaper. This is the exact reason I forced Samsung to give me a full refund such that I could buy my One X.

Btw a little correction, One X uses IPS LCD tech, one of the best panels in the industry. They call it Super LCD 2 because IPS is a patented technology. IPS loses out in contrast and colours are less saturated as compared for AMOLEDs for sure. But it makes it up with truly high pixel densities with the RGB matrix. And its impeccable, as Steve Jobs says that 300+ dpi with RGB matrix means impossible to see pixels with the naked eye even at 10 cm distance. And also to mention their excellent viewing angles just like AMOLEDs, and their more natural colour reproduction.

Not that I'm trolling, nitpicking or whatsoever. S3 is an awesome phone no doubt. Processor, RAM, camera are very legit arguements. However, just a bit of real experience for those who have never actually experienced a high pixel density pentile AMOLED display in real life and are about to buy this based on what people who compare spec sheets say about it. To be fair I would say its a slight imperfection in an almost flawless phone.
[Galaxy S III General] chaki-:
Every phone or manifacture has so called haters. So guy's don't be like kids and throw the hater word to us. We are mature people who are discussing what is good and what is bad. Simply don't become ifans here.

I wanted to buy it. And i am disappointed. The only thing that i can do is to see it for myself when it hit's the shelfs at the store. I buy unbranded phones and hope i can play with it soon. But frankly i like LCD's more then amoled.

So user expirience is important. But i rather to wait a little more for Note 2 or next Nexus....
[Galaxy S III General] ph00ny:
Other than the RAM, i agree with most of your points

Also S3 design is an evolution of the TMO S2
[Galaxy S III General] furt890:
Sure is biased here.

Assuming that you have experienced HOX's screen first hand and Galaxy S3 has not even been released yet.

Seeing the screen comparison from videos doesn't do any justice.
[Galaxy S III General] TheUnkn0wn:
HD LCD

Pros

- HD Resolution with the RGB stripe array

- Overall less power consumption

Cons

- Uses a back-light

- Blacks are not true black

HD Super AMOLED

Pros

- HD Resolution

- Vibrant colours

- Blacks are true blacks

- No back-light

Cons

- Pentile array (not as sharp as RGB stripe array)

- Overall more power consumption

Although the pentile array means images are not as sharp as the RGB stripe array; at HD resolutions its seriously not noticeable and as for power consumption the HD Super AMOLED screen actually uses dramatically less power when it comes to displaying blacks.

Anyway, I have read that there are some problems with the screen of the HTC One X, screen flickering, yellow spots, yellow hue on the entire screen and even the screen not being secured to the frame properly (I was surprised when I read this, I thought HTC's were well built). We will have to see if the SIII contains similar problems.
[Galaxy S III General] ph00ny:
pentile....
[Galaxy S III General] furt890:
I thought AMOLED uses less power than LCD.

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Smartphone-Displays---AMOLED-vs-LCD_id13824
[Galaxy S III General] TheUnkn0wn:
I have no idea why I wrote pentax... I probably like the idea of having a lens as a screen rather than a pentile display. lol
[Galaxy S III General] TheUnkn0wn:
Nice video about a pickle.

This shows you the power consumption of a standard AMOLED screen (HD Super AMOLED is meant to be more energy efficient)
[Galaxy S III General] darkoroje:
I have both Galaxy Nexus and One X. The One X screen is significantly sharper and text is much easier to read. While Nexus has deeper black, white on Nexus is yellowish.

I have had many mobiles phones in the past, the screen on One X is the best mobile screen I have seen, on par with Ipad 3.
[Galaxy S III General] nf0rc3r:
U r saying this based on your experience with the Super LCD on One X vs the Pentile screen on galaxy nexus..

Maybe you should wait for the S3 to be out before making a judgement on the screen saying its ****?
[Galaxy S III General] faddys123:
Everyone is judging the phone without even using it, bet you once it's out all the haters will regret hating and it will be the best phone in the world again
[Galaxy S III General] :
Spot on.
[Galaxy S III General] Lucasm93:
How about just waiting?

HOX and SGSIII will be the phones to get, but you can only decide by experiencing both. For the ones that already got the HOX, there's chance they will be disapointed, but there's also a chance they won't.

I'm waiting.
[Galaxy S III General] mrgrey1701:
I've been to my local phone shop knowing I am due an upgrade towards the end of this month. I briefly considered the Note but, as an iPad 2012 user I really can't justify such a big screen. I then considered the HTC One X until I picked it up: it felt horrible to me, looked and felt cheap (in my humble opinion). Lack of user replaceable battery or sd card slot then pretty much sealed the deal.

So yes, I was eagerly awaiting the announcement of the next galaxy, and I am happy to report I was not disappointed. I like the design, and the different colour options - I will be getting the pebble blue, my other half loves the marble white. Technologically it is a good step up from our previous galaxy s2's. I really cannot see why all the hate flying around not only here on xda but across the various tech sites. Really, what were people expecting?
[Galaxy S III General] boodies:
Here's the bottom line, with text anything above 300 ppi is the same to me. And the gs3 is over 300. As for movies, amoled is handsdown a much better experience.
[Galaxy S III General] jonny68:
aren't you the same poster who done nothing but complain in the SGSII forums for months on end and slagged off other posters for little or nothing,you've been put in your place more than once, it appears your still moaning!!

No one is forcing you to stay here so off you go to the HTC One X forums/.

YOU WHAT:eek:

You done nothing but complain on the SGSII forums last year and now your saying this,if i recall correctly you even said you thought the iPhone 4 was better...unreal
[Galaxy S III General] Actionx1:
Thanks to the OP for the info but honestly, the differences mention of both phones really are so small that for most users(I'd say 99%) will not be able to distinguish the difference.

I'd say people are just arguing because they're fan boys of HTC or Samsung and that's fine. You should be proud of the device you use.

The real difference between both that matter are the removable battery, SD card, and the Skin they have. I'd say camera but it looks like they both have a very good camera.

-type R blood-
[Galaxy S III General] awesome-member:
This thread will have more positive views towards sgs3 since most people will have moved on after experssing their dismay. But the fact remains they didn't capture us like they did with sgs 2 ,may be they shouldn't have released note,nexus . I really don't see any upgrade except SOC compared to its existing products(not just s2) but it makes perfect economical sense to do what they did.lets just admit that Samsung pulled a *4s*( upgrade SOC and compliment with a gimicky *cheessy software ) and move on.

Just to shout it out loud ,pen tile amoled in note is terrebly,horrible at rendering videos,if sgs3's screen has the same problem, then I'd strongly recommended reconsidering your purchase or at least make an effort to notify Samsung that you are pissed ;) .

And also the design is hedious(yes I am ranting away again) who ever thinks that the plastic is beautiful is blind.sorry but a multi billion dollar company should listen to customers opinion and I thought we all did make comments on 'plasticky'ness of galaxy phones, what does Samsung do.....GLOSSY PLASTIC .

S3 is not a bad phone,but it isn't the best either.
[Galaxy S III General] Mazzstrikers:
Ok maybe! But high chance it wouldn't be too nice. Nexus and S3 both have super AMOLED HD screens, and nexus screen is slightly smaller (meaning slightly higher pixel density). On nexus the pentile arrangement is truly visible at nominal viewing distance. So I would like to comment on the common misconception "at HD resolutions at such high pixel densities, the pentile arrangement isn't visible anymore". This is not true. It isn't all about pixel size, the pentile arrangement means the gaps between the pixels, caused by another subpixel, which is the green one, means that no matter how high the density of the pentile arrangement, the pixels will always seem visible, its an illusion caused by the extra space each pixel uses up. So if for the nexus I can see this arrangement at nominal viewing distance, I can bet my money that on the S3 with a lower density it wouldn't be better. Although to be fair, this is a prediction so all judgement shall be released for the actual release.