yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] r11pp3r:
i had a similar problem today so maybe this will help you...i will start from the begining.

i was using dark night v3 but when i updated to v5.5 today, two of my important apps were not working. it says in the play store that they wernt compatible with my device. i tried restoring anyway with titanium backup free version but when it popped up to confirm instal (where it shows permissions) it would say failed and then crash the phone on the restoring data

so i bought the pro key for titanium backup. the pro version skips this step and installs in the background. AND IT WORKED! i click on my two apps and they work as before.

i hope this helps you also.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ericksugiarto:
Yes, that is my problem...months ago i used an app to enable me to download uncompatible app that caused by this similar case. I totally forgot the app.

luckily, i didnt download the app from the previous rom. Maybe i need to flash back.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ericksugiarto:
what market enabler do?

may i have a link to market enabler?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zodiaxe66:
It gives you access to all play store and removes the region restriction.go to play store and type "market enabler"
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] r11pp3r:
Maybe flash back to the compatable rom, install the app, backup with titanium pro version, flash to new rom then restore with TB pro. it seems the hypershell feature in pro version can bypass the incompatable restriction.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ericksugiarto:
thanks all

still got incompatible issue

the fastest solution is download app from internet.
[Motorola Droid Bionic] Munns86:
I have my Droid Bionic on a ICS ROM but I would like to get back to stock. I don't have any back ups and I wasn't on safestrap. I was wondering how I flash my phone back to stock. I have heard of doing it with RSD lite. If so where do I get the file to flash on my phone?

My phone is forever rooted, will it stay that way?

Thanks!
[Motorola Droid Bionic] eye__dea:
Yes, you can use RSDlite and the 902 fxz or you can moto-fastboot the system.img.

You will loose root with both options. However, you can use motofail to regain it again.

Do you have any of the files?
[Motorola Droid Bionic] Munns86:
I do not. Do you know where I can get them?
[Motorola Droid Bionic] eye__dea:
902 fxz: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/29432364/VRZ_XT875_5.9.902.XT875.Verizon.en.US_CFC_01.xml.zip

Rsdlite 5.6 with drivers: http://db.tt/Dp7duB4C

If u dont want to wipe internal sd card: http://db.tt/woeUrdbT

(Props to timmy10shoes for some of the files)

Hit me up if you need help.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Visivo Media:
Hi all, Ive noticed my facebook always gets an ANR in the background when I leave the app and I always have to quit it from the task manager. No doubt this contributes towards the ICS battery drain for some. Has anyone else noticed this? (This app is on a UK Galaxy S2 with a fresh install of stock ICS unrooted).

Any reccomendations for an autokill app where I can just select facebook to be killed when not viewed and it will ignore all other apps by default?

TIA

Vis.
[General Questions and Answers] suraja47:
hi, i hav flashed cyanogenmod typhoon 7.2 v 3.8.1 android to my htc hd2 . 'm facing a problem my phone camera is not openin whn i try to open it says process com.android.camera and asks me to force close. wht to do for this
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] shantanubarik:
Samsung Galaxy S3 announced. It is covered by butter smooth Touchwiz 5. Will we get the touchwiz 5 throuh future firmwire update? Whats your opinion.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] EdgaBimbam:
lol firstly we need to get ics update :D with samsung software developing style maybe next year we will get touchwiz 5 ;D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] rlaw:
Doubtful.

TW5 may be a bit of a bigger departure, ux wise, than TW4, which is one REASON Samsung wouldn't want to hoist something different on their existing user base.

TW5 is also designed for new, specific sensors and other hardware available on SGS3 - so it would have to be a port for existing Note and SGS2. Similar to how HTC devices without ImageSense chip cannot ever be upgraded to Sense 4, only Sense 3.6.

Finally, Samsung would want to dangle TW5 software features for the Note's successor instead of spending time and money and backporting it over.

So, no - I wouldn't hold my breath for official TW5 upgrade. I'm sure our talented devs will port some of the features over, though.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] anonymous572:
I'm gonna remove it immediately after I flash final ICS release. Touch**** is the worse launcher I ever see. Apex launcher is perfect for me.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] afilopou:
As far as i remember all previous tw launchers used to be butter smooth in preview videos,but so laggy in reality!!!

No need for this sh@££t:)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] leppo:
I don't know, but I'll be royally pissed if our Notes don't get ICS before the S3 is available for purchase.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] afilopou:
God save the Cyanogenom team :)

i dont care about sambloatware :banghead:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Abagnale:
Touchjizz..? No thanks..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] crawlgsx:
Still, a new official Kernel means new cooked roms from official ICS. I personally can't wait.

Since the leaked bricks and imilka discontinuing his roms the dev section got real boring/quiet for me and I can't wait for official so that it will wake back up.

CM9 is awesome but choices/flavors/etc are always fun and not everyone likes the feature set of CM9 (I do, just saying).

For example I always preferred Coredroid over CM7 with my Inspire :cool:

As far as TouchWiz goes, I laugh at all the TW haters. I LOVE CM9 on the note, its way faster. That said, I can't stand EVERY launcher out there other than TW/AOSP when it comes to Samsung phones. The app drawer load time and smoothness on TW blows ADW/GO/Apex/etc out of the water. Every single time I try another launcher and enjoy some of its features or styles I get so aggrivated with the slow app drawer and end up going back. Don't get me wrong there are plenty of things I don't like about TW and plenty of things I love about Apex/ADW but the app drawer load time alone is enough to drive me insane.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] leppo:
I tried out imilka's CM9 for a week, and while it was good, I was missing the S-pen, so I went back to stock.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] CONTACTMC:
Try TSF shell, the smoothness is unreal on the Note.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] kotaro_14:
It'll probably be ported over.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] afilopou:
Spen works fine with cm9.The button of spen dont work,but i dont care for this functionality.Also catch notes with the catch add on is a very good replacement of s memo
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] XpLoDWilD:
Samsung won't offer TouchWiz UX on Note, stop dreaming.

However, CM9 and opensource can bring it to you. Check http://opendesign.blamesamsung.org/
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] zviki:
I think that is TW5 one of the selling points for SGS3,so... probably not.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] crawlgsx:
Thanks for the tip, will do.

Edit: Bah, maybe not. $17 is a lot considering my disliking for every launcher I have tried so far lol.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Zamboney:
I honestly believe the few recommending the super expensive TSF are the devs doing some sneaky advertising...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] evil-doer:
youre kidding, right?

in the history of touchwiz (which predates android, btw) no phone has ever gone from one version to the next. what is comes with is what it stays with.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] pboesboes:
You don't need to worry about TouchWiz 5 coming to our Notes, because it won't! :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] k@ke:
+1

I don't understand the hate about TouchWiz. It's so smooth and fast compared to Go Launcher or Nemus Launcher, that both are little laggy. Go launcher has the best features, but when it lags, it lags and i don't want my launcher to lag. TW all the way!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jakdillard:
This is very simple the ROM is intended to serve as a ROM for people who are like me who likes the stock ROM but with a little customization, and enjoys the ICS OS without some of the customizations found in the AOSP choices that we have so far. The goal for this is simple, stock, and bugless as a ROM can be and there is no donate button in the ROM. It uses mods and battery saving techniques that I found to work for me, but like I said since this is more of a modded stock ROM I'll keep this intro brief.

Features:

De-odexed

Build.prop tweaks for performance and to perserve battery life

Dalvik Cache moved to cache

Super User (root) and Busy Box

Native Tethering

I also have customized some settings for better user experience (well at least for me). I am keeping this simple so I'll tell you now I like how the stock ROM works so I have not added any of the CM Mods or Kang Mods and probably won't as of now. Also I am not gonna post any screen shots since this is a re-vamp of what you got out of the box and there is no visual customizations added since all of my tweaks are to the apps and settings. ....... anyway take a chance try this out let me know what ya think ...........

Download for today

http://www.mediafire.com/?ws5d7hbdpkjvk3d

or

http://www.4shared.com/zip/DIdXuE7p/Icee_Modz_1_0_6_051312.html

As always make sure you know how to flash a ROM before using this or you may encounter problems or even brick your device please follow these instructions:

1: Factory reset data and system wipe

2: Wipe cache

3: Install ROM .zip file

4: Reboot

To ensure that you get the best out of my preset customizations don't sign into google services when you setup the ROM you can always do this later, try the rom out as is to put it to the test before you add your customizations and settings to it.

ENJOY

JD

NOTE: The Google Apps provided in this ROM is to be only used with the Sprint branded variant of the Galaxy Nexus and not to be redistributed to any other device not licensed to Sprint or not a Sprint variant Galaxy Nexus, the Google Apps are the property of GOOGLE and should be respected as such and if need be I will demolish all links to Google property should I be asked to.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jakdillard:
Change Log

050412:

Initial release for Jakd-Modz 3

rom 3.0.8

Changed the name to Icee_Modz

ROM allows native tethering (at least thru USB thats all I tested)

Updated:

Maps

GoogleEarth

Street

GooglePlus

GoogleVoice

wallet

Lock Screen rotation is enabled
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] FrostyF7:
I'll try it when I get home.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] peabody42:
Does the compass work properly with this?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jakdillard:
I don't see why it wouldn't
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ifly4vamerica:
Not sure what you do with these ROMS but they are fast smooth and bugless like you state. Only issue I have on this version is MMS won't send. Had this problem on another earlier build also can't do a PRL or Profile update. Not sure why not though I have flashed wiped and reflashed like always but jo go.

GN Sent
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jakdillard:
I'll check on that for you and thanks
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jakdillard:
OK gotta fix mms
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ifly4vamerica:
Hey sorry was on a plane but I got it fixed. You just need to get the SDM.apk which apparently has the sprint prl and profile update in it. Put that in system, set permissions then reboot update profile and prl and you are golden. If you need the SDM.ak pm me and ill get it to you. Just getting off the plane but can do it when I get home.

Thanks again for this kick a$$ rom, I have tried AOKP and team eos but my phone likes this one the best with franco kernel. I do t use all the fancy stuff the others have so this is erfect.

GN Sent
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jakdillard:
Yeah I just removed the sdm package because I got tired of the phone wanting to activate every time I flash lol but I'm on my way to Chicago for the weekend and won't get back until Sunday so I will fix this then and thanks for the positive words
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ifly4vamerica:
No worries man. I got tired of that too. Once I reinstalled it I updated and then froze it with TB. Have a good trip.

GN Sent
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] broad_st_bully:
Any screenshots?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jhonecide:
would try...:)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] snovvman:
Thanks for sharing your work. Just to clarify, this is based on the Sprint's as-shipped GN ROM, with the customizations listed above, and Google Apps removed (which can be installed via the separate package you provided).

Is there anything else I'm missing?

What is the MMS issue?

Lastly, what are your customizations?

Cheers.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jakdillard:
yep based off sprint shipped and all of googles apps removed and every thing I've done to it is not anything that you will see like a theme or extra options for whatever its all under-the-hood type tweaks, and the mms thing is a fluke on my part because I removed the package that updates your profile to sprint to allow you to send mms.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jakdillard:
Its just like stock except cleaner so I dont think screens are needed for that ?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] snovvman:
Just to verify--the package is now put back into the ROM? Also, does the separate GApps package put everything back that you took out?

Thanks.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jakdillard:
No I'm in the process of rebuilding from scratch and haven't fix that yet. so I'd wait to try this out
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jakdillard:
Ok did a complete rebuild, the ROM is just like what you get out the box now (I actually like the stock ROM) everything is there just like what you get out of the box I have just did a lot of "under-the-hood" engine tuning, mms works and so does the compass .
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] hedrickms:
Awesome! I am checking this out now but like it simple.
[General Questions and Answers] Kassim.d:
What are the pro's and con's of these two smartphones? Htc one x is newer, so better ?
[General Questions and Answers] bumsock:
I definitely like the way the HTC OneX looks (in white) over my SGS2... And the screen resolution is better on the one x as well. Sure it isnt SuperAmoled but i could live with that. I'm really not sure which one has the better camera..but the Htcs camera has a few features I would be interested in trying out. Also if having a non removable battery and no expandable micro sd storage bothers you. I would actually give the htc a try if they had the one x on sprint instead of that butchered version they're calling the evo 4 g lte...maybe its looks will grow on me..:D
[General Questions and Answers] falconeight:
I have a one x and love it. It is a better spec'd phone than the sgs2. What I would say about the S2 is that it run really good for an android. The one x is buggy and does some weird stuff the s2 probably works better than any other android.
[General Questions and Answers] Threevo:
Word better than any other android ? Sorry I didn't realize you owned evry single

High tech smartphone out there ...
[General Questions and Answers] Luiooo:
i read many articles about smartphones, and the htc one-series are a bit better than the sgs2 - imo. and the haptics/quality of htc-phones are better than the samsungs.
[General Questions and Answers] no1blue:
samsung is famous because their design ( not in S3 i think it look weird)

one X is a bit stronger then s2 but i will choose s2 because it look better.:D:D
[General Questions and Answers] barzi3:
samsung is more famous i believe however htc seems better to me with better screen resolution
[General Questions and Answers] yo2boy:
It's the same 720p resolution.
[General Questions and Answers] galaxys:
Of course go with HTC!
[General Questions and Answers] Azure1203:
Does the USB jig work with any HTC phone? Didn't think so. I'll stick with Samsung please and thanks. ;)
[General Questions and Answers] paulnsx:
depends on carrier, both phones have different socs based on carrier. Get one with qualcomm 8960. Krait, adreno225, lte on 28 nm process ftw
[General Questions and Answers] DirtyTooth:
Two things that I dislike about the one x is the no SD card slot and non removable battery. They aren't total deal breakers, but still big points.

Though, I haven't looked into the S2 much, I'm not even sure if it does have those two things.
[General Questions and Answers] mike21pr:
Honestly, One X vs SGS3 is a more fair comparison

»Tegra 3 / Qualcomm S4 > Dual Core Exynos

»4.7 SLCD2 720p > 4.3 WVGA SAMOLED+

»Policarbonate Body > Plastic

»One X camera > SGS2 camera

»Sense 4 > Touchwiz 4 (opinion based)

Still, SGS2 has removable battery and expandible storage

Sent from my HTC One X
[General Questions and Answers] pikaju2012:
hmmm,,, one x :eek:
[General Questions and Answers] hanhha:
Samsung galaxy s2 is better.
[General Questions and Answers] MattyOnXperiaX10:
Fan boy
[General Questions and Answers] Bigguzzo:
I have Samsung , but I am not fan boy(I think they are like apple fan) I ovviously prefer Htc one x , a very performant smartphone from a very serious society:-)
[General Questions and Answers] Griffiths_Anna:
Of course htc one x!! .. coz it has quad core processor, I'm sure it is better than galaxy s2 .. except you challenged htc one x with sgsiii.. it will be a different story
[General Questions and Answers] -Grift-:
htc is famous for build quality... no jig but htc has official boot loader unlocking and still covers warranty after that (hardware wise of course)
[General Questions and Answers] xXOo Axel oOXx:
the screen, camera, and having ICS 4.0 with sense
[General Questions and Answers] Allanitomwesh:
The galaxy is easier to hack. The HTC is newer and faster. The galaxy has better battery and a memory slot. The HTC has more screen. It's all preference.

Imetumwa kutoka Ideos kutumia XDA
[General Questions and Answers] Private6:
I love the Galaxy SII, it's just a superb device!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] petrochemicals:
Just saw this on Reddit. Not sure if anyone on the Skyrocket knows this or not.

Here is the OP: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1633938
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Danielk425:
No mentioning of our device in this post. This would mean we are not affected, or am I missing something?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] chokesmaster:
I was about to ask the same thing!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] kronikwisdom:
That's all I see there too. Hmmm.. But, that's not our device it's the "Other Leaks" that worries..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] dakpluto:
I'm not educated enough on all of this and may be way off base, but the Note is mentioned...could this be why some people have had serious issues related to using the leak Note modem?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Swisser:
Well considering the Samsung Galaxy S II is listed, even though it .is a different model, I would think it would be safe to assume that the Skyrocket could also be effected by this since it is kernel based.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Danielk425:
It is also safe to assume that I will continue to use the leak. Happy star was day. May the forth be with you!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] nrm5110:
Our kernel is nothing like gs2 we have totally different hardware
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] orlandoxpolice:
Remember those mystery bricks we thought were user error months ago? I think this is device specific and not kernel or rom dependent. Called this months ago
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] lazer77:
Was wondering the same thing.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] artiemon:
Reminds me of smoking pot in the late 70's. You enjoyed it too much to stop, but you worried about paraquat.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] nrm5110:
This belongs in general section I think
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] slotstik04:
Anyone who's been using the leak and flashed stuff in CWM over 20 or so times yet?

Just curious. Haven't heard of too many people bricking in our community that (most likely) wasn't user error. Of course I'm excluding dev's.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] dakpluto:
Lord knows I've flashed tons of ICS leak roms. No brick yet. But I also never had issues from the Note radio either.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] andTab:
That is disconcerting.

I guess there is no news yet what the source of the issue is exactly?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] scott14719:
Here is my concern(s) with all of this. I'm not questioning the legitimacy of the original poster(s) of this, but:

A. Where is the origin of all of this? How was it discovered.

B. How can it be confirmed as a Kernel bug if it can't even be identified as to which exact source it originated from or how it works?

It seems to me that there will always be hard bricks when flashing because of user error, hardware failures, unexpected glitches, or a combination of all three. So how exactly was it determined that this is caused by a "bug" that Samsung put in certain kernels to hardbrick peoples phones?

Even though these are leaks and not "official" releases, Samsung would still be liable for damages because it is still reasonably argued that people will still use these leaks (even though unauthorized) and by doing so will damage their phones. Samsung would only purposely put a bug in the kernel for the sole purpose of damaging someone's phone. Thereby holding Samasung liable for knowingly damaging property. It is the same as if you put traps in your house to hurt people that might break in. You are still liable for enjuring them even though they illegally broke into your house because it is reasonable to assume that you knew the traps would cause harm. I'm not agreeing with it, but its is the law.

So people brick their phones. How do we know for sure it is due to a bug Samsung put in the kernel??
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mohan_kr:
Yeah I am questioning the recommendation on recovery in the OP's link. The recovery has its own kernel, that does not seem to gel very well with that assessment (unless the recovery is using the same buggy kernel, at least the recovery I use for the SR, is based of 2.6.x kernel source).

But I will agree with the assessment that the buggy kernel (via ROM flash) can cause the eMMC corruption, although I would suspect the layers above (e.g. vold configuration, but cannot rule out kernel bug).
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] slotstik04:
Read through the thread that first brought the issue up. It is provided in that warning thread. Under various occasions did people brick simply by CWM on their GS2's. In each case, they have flashed their version of the UCLD leak via odin and concequently bricked after a few CWM flashes. There is some credibility to these claims. Entropy is a great dev-I'd take his word for it. I am so glad I didn't flash the UCLD leak onto my girlfriends S2. Stuck with AOKP :)

BUT this leaves us with the question: Are we infected as a variant of the gs2 family?

Their leak was also provided by an unnamed source through DG and at the same time as ours was leaked. But...

So far I haven't seen any claims in our forums about a CWM brick after our UCLD leak. But then again I have limited internet access right now and can't search our threads to see if there actually were any. (Just basing off what I've read in the forums since the leak came out)

Also, no one is putting Samsung to blame. They are all just trying to pinpoint the issue. We understand it is our choice to use a leak. (Same with any rom. No one blames the rom builder if their flash goes bad) So far all occcurences have been from flashing a few times after the UCLD leak like I mentioned before, so it indicates that it most likely has something to do with it.

Edit: sorry misread your post. I still don't think I could blame Samsung for it. Its our choice to flash anything onto our devices and we should be held liable.