yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] xanthrax:
strange ... your pic shows that you`ve been charging the mobile ... battery icon ...:silly:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] THE RED BLUR:
Yeah something in this kernal has done something to show this.

I flashed back to Siyah and it's still doing this:confused::(

And my deepsleep doesn't work there now too.

I even did the kernel cleaninïg steps twice now no luck?

And this started after flashing 3.8 dorimanx

I might have to wipe my phone to get rid of the code left on by 3.8. I knew I should have done a backup.

Any ideas guys before I have resort to drastic measures.

.

Main ROM : RootBOX 1.3

2nd Rom :

KERNEL :Siyah 3.3.2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sam razzy:
Bro.. let him show his troubled screenshot.. Donn need of fight... ;)

sent from TapaTalk

Rom: PARANOIDANDROID phone mode v1.3b

Kernel: Dorimanx Kernel 3.8v ... Best on my Galaxy s II

GOOGLE EVERYTHING
[Galaxy S II Android Development] xanthrax:
There is no fight mate and I've got troubles too ... After reboot my battery went down to 16 from 70 . I'll go back to v3.6 and see what's happening . And i had a hell of a night duty ...

And i... Gee ... The battery is charging without no plug ... Pfff ... and frrozen screens and ... RED BLUR !!! the red light is on ! is time time for reflash ...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Ankit Tulsian:
Try resetting your fuel guage and leave it for few hours. The new version is stable and i dont have any hangs or sod.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] xanthrax:
flashed back 3.6 and the battery show . well 64 ... but 3.8 has freezes ... and i don`t have time and enough knowledge to extract some log file , i`ll try though

-=-=-

but it goes into deep sleep with 3.6 , flashed before GS2Wiper 1.8 , usual i use to use ultimate kernel cleaning script ...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sam razzy:
No no.. bro.. even m testing 3.8 .. I dint get any freeze till now.. I just took around of 20% battery without plugged to charge... There is no issue I saw.. other then hardware back button and menu button dint work well ... ;) now its fine after one reboot . Will test it more n will give the feedback...

sent from TapaTalk

Rom: PARANOIDANDROID phone mode v1.3b

Kernel: Dorimanx Kernel 3.8v ... Best on my Galaxy s II

GOOGLE EVERYTHING
[Galaxy S II Android Development] xanthrax:
thanx sam ! i go for some rest now . 3.6 seems to calm down my phone . i`ll try again few hours later . thanx for feedback . dori needs our feedback as much as we need his kernel !
[Galaxy S II Android Development] DonChulio25:
yesterday i`ve flashed the 3.6 and my os was down and dont start. after rebuild the system my batterydrain fall down from 100 to 13% and when i use the cleaning script and flash the new one its same effect.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Ankit Tulsian:
Mate try resetting your fuel gauge as its just showing wrong percentage.I would suggest to flash the 3.8 version.Its stable for me.

Dorimanx:Can you look in to this problem?After every flash battery is showing wrong percentage.This is happening in the last two versions i.e 3.7 and 3.8
[Galaxy S II Android Development] chabstyle:
Heyho,

Version 5.89 is on, i think it's for tests. :)

greets chabstyle
[Galaxy S II Android Development] truden:
This is not DorimanX bug. It is a governor's (pegasusq) feature. At least I think so.

I'm testing now (second circle) the MALI modded Siyah.

My CPU gov. is pegasusq and after I saw your post I checked the issue with System Panel.

It shows the second core as sleeping, because IT IS sleeping.

As I scroll up and down it wakes up, but the moment I stop it goes to sleep.

That is normal for pegasusq I think, and that is what makes it battery friendly.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] KenHua:
ModemRIL_XXLPS.zip

Trust the files are there for a reason. Wish someone can shed some light. The size of LPS file is different from that of other sources, wonder if it is a tweaked version that suppose to work better with Dori kernels.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] truden:
It does not affect the performance as a speed smoothness and stability.

It may affect the battery life but then you have the choice to turn off some of them or all the features that drain your battery.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dorimanx:
News update!

I have uploaded kernels to all servers!

Kernel 7.3 JB-MALI ONLY!

Kernel 5.89 ICS/JB(old MALI driver)

Change Log: for both kernels!!!

*Updated Power Manager to MAX from 3.4.Y Android Kernel with many changes on the way! update is MASSIVE! 3 pages! in GIT.

*Set OFF to Slide2Wake for default and lower profiles, it's ON in performance

*Updated WIFI drivers in both kernels!

Now should connect to N only transmitting routers! and get full speed.

*Removed 133Mhz GPU freq, it's not registered in driver and was broken.

*Added Kernel Optimization for better graphic performance and CPU.

for 7.3 we still need moddified SQL binary to get full power of I/O as with 5.89

I am downloading the SOURCE for android AOKP ROM, it's 27GB!!! more 10GB left!

Then i can create the new patched SQL :)

*Fixed system settings lost for some stuff like shelf background and others.

*Update to Gestures kernel code by Tungstwenty

*Patched MALI driver from CM! only needed parts! also added some to 5.89!

Not effect ROM boot, but will affect video driver power save.

*Fixed CRT Anim when WIFI off/on! now works all the time.

*Enabled CLEAN-CACHE tweaks in kernel code to reduce amount of I/O used to perform tasks.

*Release little more RAM by reducing logger allocated RAM. (+0.9MB)

*Some NET code fix.

OK for all new users!

This is not

SIAYH

, do not compare!

we have only 250000+ code line changes!

Siyah kernel is GOOD kernel it's THE SOURCE for all creations! :)

But My kernel is very very different.

So have fun using it, and if something is better with Siyah kernel, just switch back, all is simple, no one forcing you to stay.

Just stop spamming my thread! thanks.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Crescendo Xenomorph:
Not you think so, but its true mate. :highfive:

Long time ago I followed Siyah thread and GM explained this behavior. Its pegasusQ behavior, not kernel.

Yes its very aggressive, but also batt friendly. ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] tonysac:
I have noticed that with jb roms there is a small lag (like a shake) in the opening animation when for example I open phone application or messages. Right now I'm using Rootbox with 7.2 dori's version with nova launcher.. If I change animations to ics for example no lag at all... Is there any tweak in ex tweaks to avoid this lag?

Keep walking Greece
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bobdoblo:
Ageed, i'll never understand people who gimp their S2 to save a bit of battery!

Y U NO BUY GALAXY ACE / MINI?

Powered by NeatROM
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Crescendo Xenomorph:
Nice and BIG THANKS bro (OOT now) :highfive:

Now gonna test the new v7.3.

Still downloading and meanwhile gonna read those massive GIT log :p

You're not sleeping are you? Working day and night?

Yes, I agree with you, I also pissed off when people spamming this thread about another kernel.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bobdoblo:
And you got only 64,% battery left after 3 hours!

What is good about that?

Powered by NeatROM
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dorimanx:
Nope, no magic for broken ROM anim.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] t-pip:
Same test with Hyper shows both cores active. See earlier screenshots.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lyndonguti:
Massive changes! Like a boss

Tnx again dori :)

sent from my lovely phone....hmmm wait its a tablet...waaa i dont really know.....im PARANOID NoW!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] truden:
I'm relieved to know that I wasn't wrong :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] t-pip:
Wouldn't reducing animation speed in dev settings help (ROM setting not Kernel).
[Galaxy S II Android Development] truden:
Already answered (see few post back.

It is pegasusq feature.

It won't do it with another governor.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] tonysac:
Nope I have already tried this :(

Keep walking Greece
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Honusnap:
Good ... but I'm not using pegasuq.... :)

Your certainly do not read my post correctly ....second core SHOULD wake up when conditions are met, being 100% on the first core at 800Mhz for more than 2 seconds means that these conditions are met and the second core should already be UP .. it is not .. ! => there is a problem here.

Can you people just install "PerfMon" or some similar tools and check

1 - Being in "Hotplug" Mode, Is your second core ramped up correctly when being under charge ..? After locking and unlocking the phone ... always good ?

2 - Being in "Forced Dual Core", after locking the phone and unlocking it ... is the second core always there ?

That could explain that some people got slowdown / bad performance from time to time ....
[Galaxy S II Android Development] blizzari:
Am i the only One who thinks 5.89 Has better colors but worser gaming FPS?

Even when GPU is @ 400Mhz
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Crescendo Xenomorph:
Yes just finished reading those 3 pages GIT! Crazy... So many.. :eek:

Dori is coding like a boss.. :cool:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sianzb0i:
so should i use pegasuq or lulzactiveq for balanced batt and performance?

and how do i tame these 2 governors?

Currently my phone cant last one day and less than 2 hours screen time. Its a clean ROM wif a few apps on it only
[Galaxy S II Android Development] truden:
I hope that these are not stones thrown in my garden (Bulgarian Jews know the saying)

Thanks for the great work.

You must know that we ALL love you, Dori :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Honusnap:
?? What are you talking about .. have you correctly read the post ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Crescendo Xenomorph:
Hmm how about using System Tuner Pro for monitoring? Its more accurate. :D

Yes I know it, but it also depend on the gov.

I see the 2nd core turned on when it should (certain conditions met).

Try HYPER gov. I got no problem with this gov. ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yahyoh:
imo ondemand is the best :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Crescendo Xenomorph:
its not directed to you. I just try to explain. no offense :)

And I already answered your post. ;)

yes I know about it, that behavior is only in pegasusQ gov.

and certain parameter is just ignored in certain govs.

My setup is HYPER/Sleepy. And the 2nd core kick in @ 600Mhz. Never it missed.

-----------

I have checked the question you asked:

1. yes its OK even when charging. no problem at all, 2nd core is still activated @ 600Mhz.

2. yes, it'll stay online even when its only sitting there @ 200Mhz doing nothing. after lock/unlock its still there.

maybe you might want to backup your ET profile, reset the profile and restore?

sometimes I DO got that problem when updating kernel, solved by resetting ET after update then restore ET profile.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sianzb0i:
ondemand is good but needs some tweaking. i will have to try all these day by day :(

as well as I/O scheduler
[Galaxy S II Android Development] blizzari:
Can someone tell me if gaming has a difference on 5.89 and 5.88 because i feel like 5.89 is 200% Sloweer
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Noed:
Old days in Siyah I was a fan of lulzactive, but then I found it was too easy to mess its configs and get it really bad.

Then still on Siyah I used pegasusq for very long with great performance.

In Dorimanx I used hyper for a little, I don't need that much performance.

I didn't like pegasusq in Dorimanx.

Now using Dorimanx with ondemand for both wake and sleep, for me it's working well, and I care more for battery than performance.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Honusnap:
CPU Speed problem ... !

Flashed 7.3, settings are now to default values in extweaks, just changed

CPU :

- Maximum speed from 1200 to 800Mhz

- Set FREQ_MIN to 200Mhz (second core will not be woke up under 200Mhz)

- BUSFREQ_UP_THRESHOLD : 30%

- SCALING_MIN_STANDBY_FREQ : 100Mhz

In screen settings :

- TOUCH SCREEN LOCK FREQUENCY : 200Mhz

Click Apply, launched Antutu ... Only the first core is in use .. !!! 100% at 800Mhz

Ps : default is HOTPLUG mode
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dorimanx:
hyper rules, its not recoment to change it.

but no point to set it for deep sleep gov.

its not tuned for that.

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Honusnap:
Thanks for testing ... i've reseted many times... same problem...

Can i sent you my settings for you to try ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] truden:
The initial start of this conversation, I believe was:

Then a screenshot was posted, and I was left with the impression that it is all about pegasusq.

Sorry about that.

I cannot test it right now, as I'm still with another kernel (just for another fracking day of test, and my impatience to flash 7.3 is eating me from inside out. already have red nerve spots on my face :mad: )
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kroz:
for me nothing is better than default profile

because you tuned it, dont mess with the default settings, the developer gave it already for us,

my phone is just lucky in terms of performance+battery,

proof

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=32781196&postcount=10422

thanks again for the major update...

you rule i9100 ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Hawkeye1103:
On 7.2 I've been experiencing a lot of battery drain something that was not present in 7.1 will check it out with 7.3 and give feedback. Great work thumbs up
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dorimanx:
no to all that, changes.

reset profiles.

2 cores working perfect.

all the rest user error.

even with pegasusq, checked personnaly with the apps presented here lately.

try to use performance profile, and tell me your findings, message for all.

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pangiotis24:
for me pegasusq rules.i have had it as my governor from when gokhan released it.i tried hyper for two weeks but i didn't notice any difference nor on performance nor on battery.so i will stick with pegasusq
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Crescendo Xenomorph:
You're welcome. :)

Yes, I'll gladly help to test your setting. ;)

Btw, do you have another CPU controlling apps such as SetCPU/ROM Toolbox Pro/etc installed and active?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] droidluck:
it happened to me last time I upgraded from 7.1 to 7.2 values on my extweaks settings changed

for example the step1 freq of gpu is suddenly set to 400Mhz. The question is everytime you flash a new version

does it always come on default settings? because sometimes I don't know if dori made changes for this to

happen or I just need to reset extweak profile in cwm if the upgrade messes up my settings
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sianzb0i:
Hi bro! *hi-five* same here! I see battery > performance. But not to the extend i see lags. I used dorimanx with hyper for the past 2 days and i am having bad batt life as mentioned in prev posts, and i havent got many apps. BBS and CPU spy are showing normal stats. Is ondemand hard to control? what are the settings i should look out for? i rmb in the "early days", we could further tweak ondemand in setcpu. What settings should i look out for in dorimanx?

Probably i will give ondemand a go for tomorrow :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] b0mber85:
Some days ago there was some talk about GPU. When it's idle the frequency is set to 100mhz and 1000mv, I have chequed with Mali Status.

Where I can change that voltage manually? If the idle freq is set to 62mhz it won't boot or what could happen?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Honusnap:
Ok, look at these screenshots, all setted to default in extweaks (i used the "Default" button on the far right menu)

- Pic 1 - Antutu works as it should, two cores at 1200Mhz

- Pic 2 - I JUST reduce the max frequency to 800Mhz

- Pic 3 - Launched Antutu Again ... 800Mhz Max on ONE core...

I Suppose that not everybody got this behavior.. but could people that got problems with performance try the same process ?

ProcMon has to be installed ... to display the small window.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Crescendo Xenomorph:
Here you can see the the 2nd CPU picked the load when it met my conditions in ET.

---------- Post added at 12:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:01 AM ----------

Have you recalculate the LOAD_H0, LOAD_H1, MIN_RQ, LOAD_RQ to match the new Max_Freq?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Honusnap:
Second example : Following the previous

- Always on default (appart from the reduction of the max frequency to 800Mhz

- Pic 1 - I force two cores (second core always on)

- Pic 2 - Run Antutu ... everything is fine .. 800Mhz x 2 Cores at 100%

- I lock my phone and unlock it

- Pic 3 - Run Antutu ... the second core do not wake up ... 800Mhz x 1 Core at 100%
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Honusnap:
Nope cause it has nothing to do with the max frequency ... it just the conditions that should be met to start the second core based on the load of the first core... not on the max frequency.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sianzb0i:
have been wondering something. In extweaks, under freq_min, a lower value vs a higher value, which is better for batt savings.

For example i set to 400mhz vs 700mhz. 2nd core is allowed to kick in at 500mhz and 800mhz. If i use lower settings, which is 500mhz, and 2nd core kicks in, wouldnt i complete a task faster (2x500mhz = 1Ghz) and thus letting the 2nd core go offline and back to deep sleep state faster? or i complete the task at 800mhz (and since 2nd core is offline) it goes back to deep sleep even faster.

Which of my saying is correct? (assuming the voltages value do not multiple by 2 when 2nd core kicks in. Eg When we set 500mhz = x mV, when 2nd core kicks in its still x mV)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] avinashadvani:
Reporting that, I'm running 5.89 now after 5.88, tried all my usual stuff, everything is working fine

On default profile no changes in extweaks for now

On RR ics 2.7 main rom
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sakindia123:
7.3 with default setting

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] t-pip:
Both cores working in 7.3 for Pregasusq.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Honusnap:
"For example i set to 400mhz vs 700mhz. 2nd core is allowed to kick in at 500mhz and 800mhz" => Something wrong here or i do not correctly understand.. :)

Second core will kick in at 100Mhz, 200Mhz .... right to the TOP frequency.. ! (minus the "FREQ_MIN" parameter)

One core at 100Mhz

1 - The CPU charge grow..

2 - The second core is started

3 - The CPU charge grow..

4 - The frequency is increased

I was talking some times ago with a man that seems to know it job about that :

- One core at 400Mhz will eat much than 2x the energy needed by one core at 200Mhz (performance per watt decrease)

- Two cores at 100 Mhz will eat less power than one at 200Mhz

For the last one, a core is never "disconnected" (in actual designs at least) meaning that in single core mode, the second consume power without gaving you anything...

BUT some application will took advantage of the higher frequency when some will take it from multiple cores... and having two cores running at 1200Mhz when your task is only designed for one core ... is BAAAAd for the battery => advantage to the Hotplug mode on the "Force two cores" mode.. BUT this is rarely the case, at least i do not meet it a lot.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Crescendo Xenomorph:
Nope still can't reproduce your problem. I have tried it so many times but 2nd core still kick in @ 600Mhz.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Honusnap:
In default mode .. it works .. :)

try reducing the max frequency to 800Mhz now and report your score...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dorimanx:
No, it's not,

it's global request, i have no more time to read posts that not belong here.

i am not posting at siyah thread, i respect GM, and i have no need to advertise or disrespect siyah kernel in his thread.

so i want the same respect from users that stay here, or just passing by.

its like tell that football team is not so good, when sitting in one small room with all team supporters that ready to kick any one A@S if he think that team sucks...

you get the point.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] __NBH__:
Just flashed 7.3, reset the profile to performance then tuned it back to what I want (max. freq. 1200Mhz, gestures off) and I'm getting the delay and flicker when locking the screen like in 7.1.

Update: Apologies, screen off working all Ok and with CRT off effect. I had my animations on 0.5x, putting tham back to 1.0x solves the problem.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dorimanx:
can you prove it?

if not, stop.

no facts no bug.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sianzb0i:
The values 400 and 700 is cos from the description from extweaks, it says "speed for core not to kick in" so 2nd core will kick in the next step, which is 500 and 800.

As for the logic, i always thought it raise cpu freq first then kick in 2nd core. Does it kick 2nd core in first?

As for ur final section i totally agree with that man. His theory is correct. And also not all apps are optimized for multicore, however when u add up the clock speeds, its 2x the speed no matter what.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dorimanx:
idle GPU is now 100Mhz 900mV

that is the safe GPU boot freq!

then it's changes based on utilization.

you cant use 66 for start freq.

i need stable kernel.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pangiotis24:
let me understand.you mean that 62mhz choice on extweaks is useless or you say that when in idle status(not in use as i understand) it's at 100mhz?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dorimanx:
simple answer!

800Hrz = ONE CORE!!!!!

Second CORE will not boot!

this is my code design.

i will not mess with it.

so all that have max 800mhz, you save battery, but dont expect performance.

you get one core.

that all.

no BUG.

have fun.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lionsmatara:
Just quick question...

What is the different 5.89 and 7.3 Mali?:confused:

I'm on wanamlite rom. What is the suitable for me?? :rolleyes::)

Thanks..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Honusnap:
You mean that when the max frequency is different then 1200Mhz.... you shut the second core off, even when being in "Second core always on" ..?

It is a joke right ..?

Two cores at 500 are moret efficient than one at 1000Mhz ... for battery AND performance !

Plus, look at the second test, you said that "800Hrz = ONE CORE!!!!!", seems not right, look at the screenshot , i got two cores EVEN AT 800Mhz, just that they do not persist after a screen lock...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Osyx:
Well as far as I know wanam is stock based = no need for Mali ;) with Mali your device will not boot
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dorimanx:
:( known problem!

sql binary has to be patched!

in JB the SYNC command passed to kernel for every write, and that SLOWING the I/O and all get slower than we want.

so when i get my JB sql patched, i will add it to kernel, and we get our 7000+ score :)

for now, we will have to be happy with what JB ROM code do to us.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] psychoid:
Wanamlite got new mali drivers in it?if yes then u can use 7.3 kernel version..if wanamlite doesn't have new mali drivers in it then u use the 5.89 kernel version.. hope it helps :cool:

Beamed from my E860 using Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Christiancs1969:
Thanks again 73 sweet:D

s2 aopk 412 dori 73 pitch perfect
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dorimanx:
Yes. *62 (not 66) cant be used, for idle GPU.

idle GPU = NO GPU! so no power drain! so why you care on what freq it's will start?

it's has to start on 100, default code, and it's has big reasons, so leave it alone :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] nicola1989:
Thank you dori all work good

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 con Tapatalk 2