yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
And i have one question to you (since you are a recognized themer xD), do you know how to edit the grey bar at the top of every app?
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] dhirend_6d:
framework-res.apk/res/drawable-ldpi(or drawable-mdpi)/

activity_title_bar.9.png.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] ak700:
Sweet!!

BTW can put the network signal bars on the extreme left hand side (if possible) Makes it more WP7-ish :p

REFERENCE
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
Thank you sir!!! :D
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
I don't know, because when i tried it messed up with the notifactions, so everything was unreadable, but maybe with the help of dhirend xD.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] dhirend_6d:
Sure man. Now all I need to do is recollect what I did. :D Since I already have this mod applied along with center clock. I need to see if we can get only battery icons on left without the center clock.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
Thanks a lot man, such an awesome work!
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
Remade status bar icons again:
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] akoshun:
Looks nice!:D
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
Thanks, i put a lot of work into getting it as close to the original as possible.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
LewaOS 11.05.12 released!

Download at www.rubenandroid.tk

Screenies on www.rubenandroid.tk or on OP.

Please don't ask if the calling problem is solved, as i can not test that.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] ak700:
^^^^^Will try it!
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] propsia:
Please confirm call works or not?
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] propsia:
Nice
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] austin266:
nice rom ruben

anyone checked the calling bug..? @propsia., @ak700

---------- Post added at 01:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:32 PM ----------

not downloading... error while download
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
Weird, it works fine for me.

Try this for ODIN

And this for CWM
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] propsia:
I didn't check it can someone confirm please...
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] ak700:
Just checked it out.

The calling bug is NOT fixed :( .

Every thing else is working though.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] propsia:
It should be fixed first being of highest priority
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
Ye, i tried several things yet, but nothing worked.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] ak700:
I think we should wait for CM7 Alpha 9 or whatever the next version will be, as this is a universal GB problem.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
Ye, but i wont stop trying xD

Btw, your site is nice :D

PS: Currently having an wp7 phone in front of me to remake it in gimp xD

I have to say that wp7 bootup time is amazingly fast!
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
​

WP7 ROM Pre-release 1 Released!

Download: here

Username: ROM

Password: Download123

And download the file wp7prerelease1.zip (it is ODIN)

If the download doesn't work, ask me for a new username and pass.

If you don't like the launcher, install launcher7 from play store.

And please report bugs if you find any.

Regards,
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] ak700:
Downloading NOW!

EDIT :

IDM not supported! WTF!
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] PlumSauc3:
Downloading immediately, I can't wait! :)
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
Sorry, server got down now, will upload to gett.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
here is the gett link: http://w737286.open.ge.tt/1/files/4jzUptH/0/blob?download
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] ak700:
Just flashed your Wp7 rom. I must say that you have done a very nice work on the status bar. The phone is a bit buggy on the startup and the launcher you have used has some problems.

Also the settings app has a bug. On used airplane mode string for the wirless connection settings.

Also you have removed the cyanogenmod settings!:eek:

Overall the rom is a great clone. Just some more and you be great!
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
I know about the launcher with bugs, but that's why i said that you have to download launcher 7 from the market.

I also know about the settings app, i just didn't want a checkbox on the main screen.

It is based on aosp.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] propsia:
Froyo aosp same features like cm6 ?
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
No, it's gb aosp by marcellusbe.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] propsia:
Oh.... I thought you were working on froyo as base ...

Anyways it's also good hope this will be rocking when completed
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] eeshlikhith:
I downloaded the zip but im not able to extract it using winrar :/ it says unknown method and no files to extract. i downloaded it twice still the same problem :/

Could you only upload the tar? probably to mediafire?
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
I think it does that, because of it being compressed with lzma. I think winrar doesn't support it then. i will upload the tar, but i can't do it to mediafire, since free users can upload a max of 200 mb.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
I am uploading compressed (this time with winrar itself) to mediafire.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] eeshlikhith:
looking forward to it
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
here: http://www.mediafire.com/?at2q4wqdq847w7z
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] eeshlikhith:
Thanks downloading now :)
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] ak700:
For those who have that problem, use 7ZIP!!!!

Worked for me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] eeshlikhith:
not for me :/
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
That would be very weird, since i compressed it with 7zip.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] dkownacki:
Respect for your hard work on lewa port and WP7 themed AOSP Rom :o

When we can expect Miui GB biuld ? I think that not only me waiting for this rom :D
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] boleminoga:
+1
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
The only thing i can say that i am hardly working on it.

I can't say more... :p
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] dkownacki:
Hmm, okay ;) thanks that you are working on it ;)

This will be the best usable port for G3!
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] Ava.tar:
Congrats on your work so far mate. Have you had any luck improving the working list on ics at all?
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
Joyos 1.2.1 Released!​

Changelog:

- Lockscreen isn't oversized anymore

- Some other things aren't oversized anymore (power menu, etc)

- All official apps

- Rotation animation is back

- Bug with holding home button fixed

- A lot faster

Download:

Download: Download!

Feel free to report bugs!
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] ak700:
Great! Downloading to check whether calling works.

EDIT:

Calling doesn't work ! DAMN! :mad:
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] austin266:
@ ak700

does calling works..????
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] bauxitpz:
yeah, everything works fine, but calling doesn't..

great rom, thanks for your work! :D
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rahulgaba16:
only one ques..does calling work on any of ur rom ?
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
The only rom where it is working (i think) is wp7.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
I have a question for you guys.

Should i release miui gb with the calling bug and when i have it done, i will release an hotfix, or should i keep working on it (i dont know how long it can take).
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] propsia:
IMO

it will be nice if you release MIUIgb with calling bug fix if you have done it because it is most important feature and rest less important things can be done later by hotfix so please

:p release it
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] bauxitpz:
why dont you release wp7 rom? :D
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
It is released. Go back on the posts.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] dkownacki:
I think it will be better when you relase MIUI when you fix calling bug, so we get beautiful and full usable Rom :D
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] andreapier:
I'm not happy to say what i'm gonna say but...

Who will you one (whichever) of you rom if all of them will make a PHONE actually something that is not a phone any more??

What can you with a phone that is not capable of handling calls??

Well, you can play, be cool with your friends... but you will soon flash another rom when you get back home.

So, as you asked users opinion, i say stop releasing million non working stuff and just concentrate on one issue at a time.

Note to everyone: i just expressed my opinion as you do so do not come here saying "let him do what he feels lile" or stuff as i'm actually letting him. I'm not discouraging anyone. On the countrary, costructive opinions help us developing better software. DO NOT BE KID HERE PLEASE, REALLY PLEASE
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] ak700:
^^^

True bro. I really feel that you should first work on calling bug and then start porting roms.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] rubensollie:
I agree with you (just that i don't use my phone for calls and sms, i only use internet xD), You just gave the wrong quote since it's working in wp7. I will focus on the call problem first.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] koko008:
I really like that wp7 styled ROM, I hope, you'll make it more usable! :)
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] Halco:
Release Miui GB when all features are fixed :) Thanks bro', i waiting that :)
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] Smonic:
Does calling work on the WP7 rom?
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] ak700:
YUP!
[Epic 4G Android Development] KennyG123:
This is all Darkierawr's work putting this together. He asked me to release it if I have time as he does not. So I tested both files by Odining back to stock, rooted and flashed the BML then the MTD version from there. If you see Darkie around make sure to hit a thanks for him.

The MTD version will convert you from BML also and that is a big thanks to Toadlife for his conversion script.

So this is a flashable of the odexed full stock prerooted of the FC19 leak. Big thanks to Whosdaman for getting the tar for us.

The FC19 modem is here: http://d-h.st/eU1

For Odin installation of modem - Odin 1.85: http://d-h.st/i1Q

This was rooted with shadowkernel so thanks to Bbelos!

The FC19 leak had the Sprint Connections Optimizer conspicuously missing so was this a backup plan? Who knows. Check it out if you like.

BML version:

http://BillionUploads.com/ziulfl4gps4w

MTD version:

http://BillionUploads.com/qrdcikacmupq

Neither I nor Darkierawr are responsible if you brick your phone, partner breaks up with, favorite show gets cancelled, a dingo eats your baby, a tornado takes you to Oz, or of course the Zombie apocalypse!
[Epic 4G Android Development] KennyG123:
Reserved
[Epic 4G Android Development] animal1589:
very nice

Finally a flashable as usual u guys rock!! any reason not deodexed??

Odin is still definetly the way to do it.. coming from fc09 all the apps came with but still have 4g randomly coming on plus random reboots and freezing up when scrolling through the market hopefully this fixes all that. would still love to have sound for boot animation and some kind of sutdown animation would rock... any chance??
[Epic 4G Android Development] orlzzt:
Taking 2nd just to say "thanks" and hope you had fun at the birthday party! I'm way too happy on Rom Populei v2.1, but if I ever need it, I'm glad the genius of KG123 brought it!
[Epic 4G Android Development] KennyG123:
Coming from Odin of FC09 on BML this has all stock boot ani and sound. The MTD kernel used has the flashing Android waiting for you to stick in bootani and sound of choice. As for deodexed...easily done with Xultimate or deodexed tool of choice. If there is a big demand for the stock deodexed FC19 leak I will do it for you guys. I think Sleeper also posted a deodexing and odexing tool.
[Epic 4G Android Development] darkierawr:
YAYYYYYYY
[Epic 4G Android Development] KennyG123:
OK there he is in the post above this one...THANK that man!
[Epic 4G Android Development] animal1589:
Same here!

I am also noticing better results with the fc09 modem, I will probably flash back. So what is the difference between odexed deodexed?? sorry for the noob question.. but i have always used deodexed. thanks
[Epic 4G Android Development] KennyG123:
A quick google will get you better answers but odexed means each apk in app folder and each jar file in framework folder is coupled with an odex file making it more difficult to theme or mod. Deodexed combines needed info into the apk files as well as in classes.dex. Then just the apk or jar file can be modded.
[Epic 4G Android Development] animal1589:
thanks kenny

So any chance of getting a deodexed version?? appreciate all the help just dont want to screw it up trying to change to odexed version.. haven't tried that yet.
[Epic 4G Android Development] darkierawr:
The only thing deodexed is used for is theming and modding.

If you're not going to be doing either of those flashing this should be fine.
[Epic 4G Android Development] Trident:
How do we strip out the Sprint bloatware? Once it's rooted, can it just be uninstalled? Or will it come out with one of the uninstaller apps?

I think it's time to try something stock again- as much as I like ThunderHawk4, I'd really like my data to work correctly by itself all the time.

I have a personal [unproven] theory that different phones react differently to different ROM/kernel combinations. My first EPIC definitely played better with a greater variety than my current refurb. Maybe STOCK is easiest for some?
[Epic 4G Android Development] KennyG123:
Titanium backup can uninstall system apps. You can also delete them out of system\app directory with 7zip before installing.
[Epic 4G Android Development] eigerzoom:
thanks for putting this together

its queued up as the next rom to install

sometime here it'll happen
[Epic 4G Android Development] DaggettBeaver:
Is there another tool besides Xultimate to deodex? For reasons too boring to explain here, I can't use Xultimate.
[Epic 4G Android Development] Naddict:
From Sleeper Rom thread
[Epic 4G Android Development] KennyG123:
Try this:

http://androidforums.com/eris-all-things-root/112139-first-ever-all-one-deodex-kitchen.html
[Epic 4G Android Development] wolfen1086:
What does it look like?
[Epic 4G Android Development] eigerzoom:
i was hesitant to flash this due to the 2.0 / 2.1 bug of flashing first...

but decided to take the plunge.

so far so good.

passed the work test :p
[Epic 4G Android Development] KennyG123:
2.2 will have no flashing bug and going back to FC09 with a brand new FC09 kernel courtesy of Earthbound. Tomorrow it will be released.
[Epic 4G Android Development] eigerzoom:
why fc09?
[Epic 4G Android Development] KennyG123:
FC19 was a leak that did not play well with EL30 kernels. Not sure about the new FC09 kernel but want the most stable, battery efficient, fastest ROM that I can put together that will work on every phone. CleanGB set the bar and I am striving for something that will be almost as historic.
[Epic 4G Android Development] eigerzoom:
what are people thinking of sprint connection manager?

i guess i tried it...but just deleted the system apk
[T-Mobile LG G2x] SnipeySnake:
So to anyone who experienced best of both worlds of the 2 ICS roms, which one do you like more?
[T-Mobile LG G2x] CB620:
It's hard to decide but from what I've been seen HFS seems to be a fan favorite.
[T-Mobile LG G2x] partylikeaninjastar:
When I used EB, it felt really stable, but it's missing so many tweaks that other roms have and you really can't customize it much. I've been bouncing back and forth between different roms, but I'm looking to jump right back to EB as soon as they release a new build. I just hopped on HFS again after being on AOKP and Genesis and I'm loving it. HFS 1.4 was actually my first ICS rom and I've used that one longer than other because it worked fine and didn't see any reason to switch.
[T-Mobile LG G2x] jaywillsoul:
Ok, typical question. HFS and EB are both really good. If your looking for more customization, HFS is most definitely the way to go. If you could really care less about that then go for EB.

If you get HFS, be careful on the versions. With v1.7 you need the update harsh kernel to use usb mass storage. It'll tell you that when you look at the HFS thread.

EB uses the FAUX kernel. I forget which one came with it. I changed kernels after a little while. Not sure why, I didn't have any problems with the faux kernel and only led myself to have a much shorter battery life. So be careful.

Other then that , they're both very stable, both run very smooth, and both are good on battery life.

The choice comes down to preference.
[T-Mobile LG G2x] ciscisc:
HFS with Faux kernel gets my vote.

I am not really that cutting edge... I just like stability, a charge that lasts the day, and a smooth interface. It has these.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] aami.aami:
hi. i have seen people here saying that "Benchmarks prove nothing" and even one of the Senior member saying so.

but what i have experienced after using Note and switching between different ROMS like Rocket Rom v22 and v23, Midnote, CheckRom and Stunner Rom, i have found that Yes the Benchmarks Do matter a lot in terms of just explaining how your phone will perform.

i mean i ran the bencmarks on all of these Roms and i used them all for about 4 to 5 days each, and i found that not all of these give equal results and not all of these are equal.

the Check rom performed the worst among all of these Roms. by the time i installed it, my phone started giving me issues. like the battery issue. whenever i connected the phone to the data cable and either connect to my pc or laptop or even the charger, there would a screen popup saying, battery removed! i did everything i could do to fix this issue but all in vain.

well the best Rom in terms of performance is the Rocket Rom. rocket rom gave me the highest scores and i found it to be the most stable Rom.

Midnote was ok rom. it gave me really good benchmark scores but there were lots of force closes.

i really dont want to talk about the CheckRom. it gave me the lowest scores and it proved to be the most buggy rom i have used, and then came the battery removed issue.

Surprisingly i, the ICS Stunner Rom was the Rom which gave me around 110000 score in the Browser mark in the native browser, but for the rest of the benchmarks it gave me normal scores.

so in my point of view the best rom for note for now is the Rocket rom, but if u want buttery smooth UI and 199% smoothness, go for the ICS Stunner. but the payoff is that u loose the SNote and the screen capture capability which i really love about my note.

hence proved, Benchmark Results Do make a difference!...... These are my own personal results and you may have different results but I thought I would share my findings....
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] foxmeister:
Hardly proved! Far from it.

Benchmarks *can* give you an indication of performance, but *nothing* is better than simply trying out different ROMs and making your own objective decision.

Fwiw though, some benchmarks simply aren't worth the time and effort - Quadrant, I'm looking at you! :-)

Regards,

Dave
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] afilopou:
I am gonna steal my friend's Chasmodo quote (credits to Chas)

A man without a benchmark is like a camel without electric toothbrush

end
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] bioweb:
Benchmarking could be slightly usefull when comparing different roms though optimalizations that are specifically made to reduce boottime, remove lag or whatever might not show up in te scores.

Using benchmarks to compare phones is definately useless, for example because Android forces you to run apps in the native phone resolution. The Note runs at 1280x800 which means any phone with a similar GPU but lower resolution like the standard 800x480 could synthetically outperform the Note.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] thesavagedonkey:
Just to throw another point in there I know it can be easily disputed but take for example iOS and windows phone.

Windows phones are limited to single core and they still run smoothly due to optimization.

the latest iPhone 4s has a dual core A5s @ 800mhz, yet it still runs smoothly.

As mentioned above in the thread the only real way is to try out the phone for yourself.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Zamboney:
Dude, it's obvious you're no scientist. You haven't proved anything trying to connect benchmark scores with stability and force closes. The only thing a benchmark could indicate is possibly smoothness. It's all about you simply trying different ROMs and finding one that is subjectively working best for you.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] emuX:
Benchmarks generally test specific capabilities of hardware: arithmetic calculations, GPU performance, etc.

That being the case they are a good yard stick for how the HARDWARE of different devices compare in terms of performance for the most part. Although software and the OS do obviously play their part, the tests are generally targeted at exercising specific aspects of the 'computer' rather than the overall OS.

OS performance is another, much more complex, aspect that benchmarks struggle to cater for. Small changes in benchmark scores between different ROMs is unlikely to tell us much. Somebody who reviews those ROMs and give a fair summary of the overall performance, stability, etc is a much better guide (like the OP, in this case - after a fashion!)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] stoney73:
Check Rom is '****ty'?

What utter claptrap. Only proves you have no idea about how to set your phone up properly.

As for the battery issue, really? I've been running checkrom on 3 notes(mine,my wifes and my dads) and never had fcs, battery issues.

Benchmarks are for people like you. :rolleyes:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] chasmodo:
Yo, Benchmarker, watch your language.:mad:

Calling any development '****ty' just showcases your poor manners, egomania and general absence of intelligent thinking.

The devs give you something for free.

You don't like it, move on. And keep shtum about it. That's what people with manners do.

I wish you luck in your future benchmarking endeavors, and hope never to hear about them.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] M3TALLICA:
Benchmarks don't prove a ****. But I do it every time I try out a new kernel and waste 5 precious minutes of my life.

By the way, calling Checkrom ****ty was insult of all checkrom devs and ultimately an insult of xda itself, we are here because of all these devs.

You simply could have said it had lowest benchmarks or even it was sub par.

May I hope that next time you will carry general code of conduct and keep your ****ty opinions within your skull ?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] ~BSOD~:
That's what I'm talking about.

Don't benchmark the OS and mobile, but benchmark your brain that is it capable enough to run that device at its fullest without the need of any score to prove anything.

Just my 2 cents.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Richy99:
where have you proved anything? you really are a bit deluded arent you
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] rockky:
Benchmark are valuable in terms of relative comparison to the same benchmark.

Benchmark just don't correlate well to real world performance.

IE: Note LTE ATT on speed app runs 15-20 M's, mine runs 7-9 in same location. Same network. Yet download Engadget simultaneously and they're even.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] mfractal:
Benchmarks prove nothing.

/wisdom
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] chasmodo:
Benchmarks prove everything.

/wisdumb ;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] aami.aami:
i really dont understand why some people dont understand what the main point some statement is. its quite simple, nothing scientific and i did not talk about any technicalities. see for your self, the more smoother the ROM is the more better the Hardware of the phone is going with the build of the ROM that's obvious, right? now that would mean more room for the hardware of the phone to be available for better benchmark results.