yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] dr. xp55:
He's right. Calibration doesn't do anything. Its just another one of those useless apps that people think is recommended when it does absolutely nothing. Including Juice Defender.

plus if you have read the cm9 wiki faqs, even they have said its pointless. And I'll take their advice, especially when cyanogen himself is a software developer for samsung. so they know what they're talking about
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
Thanks...

Information has been reached...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
For calibration... I may agree.

But why juice Defender too..

IT'S really does

a nice work by shutting off wireless and data while phone is not in use...

And we all know that wi-fi or data eat and drain battery in hunger way..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] dr. xp55:
there's a thread in the general or Q & A about JD. go and read it :p

I don't know how much more smooth cm9 can get. unless you don't even touch the screen and you can swipe while your finger is a cm away :p
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] m3dd0g:
When you could read java code you would see the difference so don´t speak about things that you dont understand. Liquid has its own framework its completely different.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] reinbeau:
Thread cleaned

If you are here to help with the development of the ROM, please proceed. If you are here to argue, you're done here. Stick to the topic, time to move on.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] oka1:
From the Moderator

People, Stop..... stop inciting and creating pointless skirmishes.

No Good comes from it.

Follow the Rules, Be Respectful, play nice.........

Also, Almost everything in Android is built off others..... remember to give credit where credit is due..... CM group and the AOKP Group both created new things we all borrow and appreciate. That said, it does not mean the work done based off their work is not original nor without Value.

Everyone who puts a rom together does so by putting some of their own spin on the rom......And that......... is how we Discover, Learn and Grow...... All of them deserve our respect.

Thanks..... Moderator.....
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] envyofindia:
This thread is a good example of enthusiasm turning into frustration. .. since last weekend when v2 was announced as releasing shortly, many people would have wasted time checking and rechecking this thread multiple times a day. ..lately, everybody's frustration is visible in the kind of comments that are getting posted. .. its fair not to ask for eta but when it comes from the author, it obviously sets the ball rolling. .. hope M3dD0g is not enjoying this madness and brings sanity to everybody by keeping his word of a weekend release. ...:-) ..cheers in advance. ..envy
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Elle233:
I agree with you bro. However, I think evolving situation within the past week must have contributed to the delay.

Prevailing situation is also hard for M3dd0g coupled with various attacks on him which did not help matters.

I'm sure v2 is ready since many days ago and he is just holding it back for some reasons best known to him
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] bhasg1007:
+1
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
thanks God...

criticizing Finished..

hope we see V2 soon.

---------- Post added at 05:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:35 PM ----------

some people don't help here..

they are just Frustrating others..

I wish everyone to be cooperative and away from cynicism and Rants..

with respect..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] appro77:
What kernel is this rom using and is it vulnerable to the bricking issue that has been talked about a lot lately?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mac231us:
Oh dear..here we go again..lol

(see op for starters..fully read even the scrolling text box on changelog)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
No Body here...

.....!!!!!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] matius44:
Yea it has an affected kernel with the I/O bug that might brick your Note..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
i am using this ROM since issue date...

doing every thing with CWM

full wipe..

wipe cash..

wipe dalvick..

installation of zip file..

every thing except restoring..

nothing happened and device working like a charm..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Reb0rn:
For now...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mac231us:
I agree..a brick might fall on one's brick and destroy it too..lol..just cannot believe..hence the aptly-named paranoid android rom now in progress.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
And 4 ever..

Nothing ganna happen..

And even so.. If my device broken, i will buy another one.. And install same ROM again...

Haha:p
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] antiochasylum:
Just because you are a lucky one doesn't mean "nothing ganna happen", yea you might have the ability to but another one, but a lot of members do not have that option.

Its a proven fact buy Google to stay away from "leaked ICS" kernels. But hey what does Google know right? :rolleyes::rolleyes:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] chasmodo:
You think everyone is wealthy enough to follow your suit?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mac231us:
Hey Firas..you did not mean to want others to follow you, did you? i hope not...;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
Can you people count me only 5 to 10 device has been broken....

Just because Google said so...

Even here in xda...

How many??

Maybe one... Maybe none...

I know personally peoples brake their own devices with abyssNote kernel...

Is this mean it's not safe too...

By this logic nothing is safe coz it depends upon how you use it..

Even you experts people, how many times you did flash from those kernels.. And that was before the BIGGEST ANNOUNCEMENT..

Can't you see the date of releasing the first repeack and the time period after till the GOOGLE announced the injuries of the kernels..

Did anyone from you broke his device...

Or we just need party to start dancing.....

To hill with Google and it's lies...

And samsung too..

They don't care about you people..

They only care about their investments..

And developers are the most dangerous threatening enemies for them..

By our hands we do every thing..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mac231us:
it was the abyssnote ics kernel (not the abyssnote gb kernel) that was bad. It somehow gets mixed up with the gb kernel as I think the ics kernel came with touch as is the 4.2 abyss (gb) kernel. but yes, your comments understood. Heck GB itself was a leap for devices like even the Infuse (samsung).
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] antiochasylum:
You are correct. You know it all man. What does XDA know then? Nothing, we should all listen to you, oh great one. :eek::eek::rolleyes::rolleyes:

I'm done with this dude.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
You are most welcome... :thumbup:

And by the way... XDA is not only a few persons ..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] reinbeau:
Have you read the PSA?

Those of you who think there's nothing to the kernel/brick issue should take a moment and read through this thread, where everything is explained clearly and factually. Do not belittle this issue. Do not give others the impression they should belittle it, either. Unless you want bricks to build a wall.....;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
Theories...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] antiochasylum:
Wow, just because it didn't or hasn't happened to you doesn't mean its a theory.

Are you a Google or Samsung kernel developer? No. You are basically saying Google, Samsung, entrophy, chainfire are liars.

You are making yourself look like a complete moron.

M3dd0g sorry to hi-jack your thread.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] FirstNoobToBrickHisPhone:
I have flashed Stunner and many Samsung leaks several times without issue. Even did backups, wipes, flashing other ics roms using ics recovery. I'm on CM9 now though.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] chasmodo:
Theories?

I got one of your theories after flashing LPY kernel over CM9. A complete black-brick, the phone totally unresponsive. That happens when you flash a safe kernel?

Theories, indeed...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Bolini900:
Im using V1 now with the Invertus theme with 240 dpi and everything runs smoothly, just have two questions.

Where can I find the wallpaper that is shown in the OP for invertus theme? And also, im using ICS Browser+ instead of stock browser, is it possible to use the themed browser icon in Apex dock for any browser?

Thanks for a great rom, looking forward for upcoming updates.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] matius44:
Just like the saying goes:

"The worst scourge is what makes you laugh"

I assure you that no matter how many times you flashed, chasmodo flashed more and also without issues :)

Until the last one that is..it's just sooner or later, literally..

Glad you're on a safe one now though :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] chasmodo:
Theories: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1661590

More theories: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1650209

Yet more theories: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1653290

Even more theories: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1663971

Some more theories: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1665152

I'd strongly recommend you to do some research in the future before posting stuff that make you look like an uninformed and arrogant tool.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
I am not a developer..

I am just a man analyzing events and issues ..

by my simple mind of logic..

the strange and puzzling thing which lead to Confusion is why only now we talk about this ..

why not before..

why nobody before complain or had same issue..

more thane month's ..

just why..??

I am sure you people got more experience than me,

you had a lot of ROM testing..

breaking the device or even mother board is common expected mistake which can be happened ..not only now , since the manufacturing date of device..a lot of user reached this stage with even GB ROMs .

why ? is also GB kernels not safe ??

how many ROM are here in XDA ? is the installation procedure same ??

GB,ICS,etc..

why some people pass the installation successfully and others not..??

my self and even with safe kernel mentioned reached to black screen and i managed how to rescue my device, and that was with safe kernels..

i am not showing my self as an expert ..i am only wondering around and try to figure out where is the mistake ??.. learning from my mistakes

Finally i apology for every one if i hurt his feelings..

that was only an opinion , nothing more .. .

maybe if i break my device i will figure out that i was totally mistaken

..but thanks god i still have my device in perfect condition ...

sorry again ..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mac231us:
The thread does not mention backup or nandroid backups which is at least what I have done in the past with lp5-outfitted roms. (restores always through 4.2 abyss). Have also migrated to 3.9 abyss for just plain wipes using jdroid's kernel cleaner first (unless doing dafuq kernel). There are so many variations maybe hard to diagnose..flashing LPF? zimage through CWM over an existing ROM (maybe chasmodo did this..and then what did he do? was it a wipe process that bricked?), re-packing zimage inside a ROM and reflashing, having a ROM with the zimage inside in the first place (which I do not think is necessarily a bad thing as long as not doing wipes in its own CWM as the growing chorus indicates), mobile odin, pc-odin etc. I have done wipes on lp5 (not anymore) and the old lp1 (backups even seldom worked on that one) but with regards to backups have had no problems. Understand the concerns.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] hackerboi:
Getting back to LiquidSmooth :)

Any news on M3dd0g ? I have a feeling he has been a victim of the infamous brick bug
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
never...

---------- Post added at 03:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:42 PM ----------

Wrong feeling...

I trust this man and trust his work too..

maybe he is busy somewhere ..

he will be back soon ...

have faith on him ...

I do...

At least he is Not arrogant, loudmouthed, bumptious, fanatic , venomous or offensive blind follower man ....:p:p:p
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mac231us:
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/hard-brick-bug-on-galaxy-s-ii-and-note-leaked-ics-kernels/
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] antiochasylum:
Dude, he's using a kernel that CAUSES BRICKS, WHAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND ABOUT THIS. OH WAIT YOU WILL JUST BUY ANOTHER AND RUN THE SAME ROM. Wow. Just wow. And I know your last line wasn't directed at me.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
Of course Not for you.. Not for anyone here..

And i hope you are wrong...

I have faith on this man..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
He did his ROM in such magnificent way like no other.. That's true.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] antiochasylum:
The rom has nothing to do with the brick. Its the kernel. Good god its like beating a dead horse.

Chas or matius please...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
Here is the deal..

You run his ROM on your device..

And if it's brick.!, Just inform me..

you be sure I WILL NOT BUY YOU ANOTHER ONE.. :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] sswagonman:
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha as someone who suffered from this so called " brick theory" it is possible for anyone to do it
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] antiochasylum:
No thanks. I listen to Google. Plus I like running my compiled winzipped rom.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] matius44:
I gave up long time ago mate :/

Though never before thought brain washing can be severe to this extent, it's like absolute separation from reality..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] appro77:
Ok, I'll ask the dumb question. Is there a "safe" kernel that will work with this rom?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] matius44:
Not completely..

As of yet, there are only 3 ICS safe kernels:

DAFUQ, WizDom and the one included in CM9..

DAFUQ is mostly TouchWiz oriented, but all of them will break some features if you flash them on AOSP/AOKP ROMs (like wifi, hwaccel, accelerometer etc)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] appro77:
Thanks. Am I correct in saying that if I don't use recovery I shouldn't have a problem?

If I was going to move from this rom, which I can't see myself doing in the near future, my plan was to first flash AbyssNote 4.2 and then flash from there.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] appro77:
I'm not satisfied that this rom is performing as well as it should be on my Note especially regarding battery life. If I wanted to reflash the rom clean is the following the way to do it?

1. Backup all apps with Titanium Backup.

2. Boot into recovery and flash AbyssNote 4.2 kernel.

3. Reboot recovery.

4. Do a complete wipe including cache and Dalvik.

5. Flash LiquidSmooth.

6. Restore apps with Titanium Backup.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
There is better way...

Step 1,2,3,4 are correct...

Step 5 : go back to proper rooted GB ROM, I prefer CheckROM NoteHD V6

Step 6 : flash first repeack LP1 ROM through Mobil Odin..

Step 7 : reboot system twice..

Step 8 : reboot to recovery then flash LiquidSmooth V1

Step 9 : Don't leave recovery.. Full wipe Data/Cach/dalvikCach.

Step 10 : reboot system..

DONE... Enjoy...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
By this way you will never lose root. And you will keep loud call volume in ics...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mac231us:
Thanks ...in call volume always been issue for me in ics..gb in call was better...gb later roms had auto data on off for send receive mms..very convenient.. only miui ics has this and can be switched on off...some functionality in services.jar i think..looks like some brave soul reported my post..lol

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=26011935&postcount=9

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=26014863&postcount=16

going to put zimage of a safe kernel into v1 see what happens (done it before on other kernels)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] firasusman:
Extract the zimage from the rom you want then flash by m.odin

Same result..

But maybe wi-fi will go....
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] envyofindia:
Is all well with M3d D0g ? .... has v2 been scrapped ? .... its already been a very long wait since it was announced! ... envy
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] umair1234:
i installed this rom on asylm..um dint like it so tried to instal back the asylm..but it stucked on installing update..and now i cant turn on my fone,...what happended? any idea :S

---------- Post added at 02:03 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:58 AM ----------

i hope my fone is not bricked! i cant turn it on..cant go in recovry :S
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mac231us:
for me it was liquid..try asylum did not like it..back to liquid (and miui too)-g

anyway...u need to get gb abyss 3.9 or 4.2 kernel (both have red redpill recovery) or a complete gb rom installed then do full wipe (in the gb kernel/gb rom recovery)..think even franco kernel will do..then install what you want..do not think you can just overwipe roms especially these do not mix...go to recovery if you can..and install gb 3.9 abyss kernel but you need to have that already on sd card..otherwise follow

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1659768

it is in your asylum op itself
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Reb0rn:
There's how safe the kernel is on this rom... when you installed asylum directly from lp5 kernel you corrupted your eMMC. This happens to some ppl but. Consider yourself unlucky. But in this day and age I can't for the life of me understand why you would flash a rom that uses any of the ics touchwiz kernels. Its pasted everywhere. They are not safe! Never ever belive someone that says that!

Sorry friend but your super bricked... you learned this lesson the hard way.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] appro77:
Aren't the Touchwiz kernels only "not safe" when you try to use recovery? There are a lot of phones out there happily using LPY and LPF. If you don't try to use recovery with these kernels can they still be unsafe?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] matius44:
No it's NOT safe, Guys listen to the knowledgeable people when you are in doubt. Do you question your doctor when he/she diagnoses you?

Chainfire and Entropy both said it's not safe, and there was at least one report of brick with the stock LPY kernel (not even CF-Root) just by doing factory reset from within the Settings menu!

And people attacked me when I said here adjust the OP, not just "resolve kernel issues" in a post buried in the thread
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Kangal:
They can still be unsafe out of the recovery.

Entropy (an experienced and recognized kernel developer) said that the processes occuring in CWM-recovery aren't that different to the processes in Android. He said there's a risk using it normally, and that with high I/O usage it will be just like flashing the rom and the stupid "feature" will activate = wipe your emmc and possibly a "bad" wipe so that it can no longer write (ie Actual HARDWARE DAMAGE)...meaning even with a Jtag/Jig and Odin you cannot revive it because it is hardbricked (aka SuperBricked).

This "feature" (MMC_CAP_ERASE) has a use and is from Google source (the AOSP). But something in the kernel keeps activating it when its used heavily (I/O - like hard number crunching in Android or Recovery) and wiping the eMMC. Its NOT meant to be activated under those situations, at least not automatically and not uncontrolled.

You need to realize this is a REAL issue, and NOT a scare tactic from Entropy, Reinbeau, ChainFire, neobuddy, etc etc. These are real (and recognized) developers/members who confirmed the bug in the kernel of the official ics roms (lpy, lpf, lp9 etc). And its not just the N7000, other Samsung devices have the same bug in the kernel, with confirmed bricks. There's a reason the thread is STICKIED in the board. Remember these developers dont get anything if you flash/dont flash...so for this to be a "scare tactic" is completely baseless and without any sense. And flashing a new bootloader won't solve the issue, but is very dangerous and can lead to headaches later for you.

As much as I appreciate the enthusiasm in this thread, I do respectfully warn you to get some background info before you flash ANYTHING. Some members here like firasusman shows his enthusiasm and is telling people to flash this rom with the new kernels and telling you there is zero risk. His justification is that "He trusts this man [m3dd0g]" and that buying another Note is Not a Problem. I will just tell you upfront those are DANGEROUS propositions.

I don't know you, but I dont want you to BRICK your device; weather SOFT or HARD. Its such a pain if its happened to you, and the financial burden can be too much for some people. I've played around with a JTAG so I'm telling you this from experience, its a very bad state (frustrations/time wasted/effort spent) to be in. There have been many people who've flashed the LPY kernel and haven't bricked their devices, but there now AT RISK when flashing another kernel/rom and even normal usage...and even that is something I wouldn't wish for anyone.

Here's the summary: Wait for it!

The (few) Kernel developers WILL eventually create a custom kernel WITHOUT the bug, and use the new drivers from the kernels. Or Samsung will respond to our emails and update their software/release an ics update without the bug. Or the available "safe" kernels (eg CM9 nightlies) will resolve their issues (loudspeaker etc etc)....and safe development will continue. Just follow the boards for news, trust me the wait will be worth it :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] appro77:
Thanks for going to the trouble to post this. Very informative and appreciated. Now I'm worried. I'm currently running RocketRom v1 ICS with the LPY kernel. From what you've said there's a chance that it could all go pear shaped.

I have a nandroid backup of Litening Rom v1 which is GB. Maybe I should flash AbyssNote 4.2, then restore the Nandroid backup of Litening rom then sit on that until this superbrick fiasco is resolved.

Of course the question that comes to mind is why are the developers of these current ICS roms that are using the new kernels not giving users the information and warning that you just have?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] AA1973:
This is just unfair. Have a look at the original post of eybee1970's Rocket Rom ICS, which you are currently using. There are warnings. Just read the post once or twice...

Galaxy Note N7000 - PARANOIDANDROID (CM9)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] appro77:
The only warnings that I read were regarding using cwm on that kernel. There were no warnings that there is a chance of superbricking the phone just by using the rom as posted above.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] chasmodo:
Kudos for the nice post, Kangal.:)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] reinbeau:
There are two stickies, at the top of General and Development, that explain the whole thing - we can't help it if people don't read what we post. I've tried to make it as clear as possible, copying posts into those announcement threads as they're posted with information. Do not listen to those who are belittling this issue - unless you need more bricks for your wall.

Read this post on the portal for official word from Android development if you won't believe the experienced developers here.