yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Android Themes] weiti000:
I started creating themes for Crybernation beta 3 a few weeks ago in our German Forum and i was recommended to publish them here too.

So here is CrybernationColors, Colors for S+

Deodexed Stock should work too, but its not tested.

features:

Aroma-Installer!
theme-colored 13-ToggeMod
AOSP-Lockscreen - theme colored unlock button
AOSP-Lockscreen - theme-colored logo
theme-colored volumebar
theme-colored loadingbar

Colors

For matching theme colors with widgetsoid, etc, here the RGB-codes:

Ostrich: ff9800

Beaver: 33b5e4

Goat: 9cc906

Bear: afafaf

Bat: 00439a

Installationguide

Flash with CWM

13-toggle will be installed automaticly everytime! If you run any theme on a rom without this mod you will have 13-toggles after the installation!

If you dont like:

install CrybernationColors - Default via CWM

Change lockscreen Wallpaper:

Copy your Wallpaper to [Color].zip\framework\framework-res.apk\res\drawable - name it default-wallpaper.jpg bevor - and install theme via CWM.

Open Questions:

How to change Color of the AOSP-Lockscreenclock?

Who has some Icons i can edit with photoshop for Wifi/Bluetooth (stats, not toggle)?

EDIT: Link Posting is not allowed. So Crybert posted them below, thanks!
[Android Themes] weiti000:
Downloads

crybernation 1.0.1

RainbowPack - all colors + default with aroma-installer : bit.ly/RainbowPack1_0_1

single downloads: mediafire.com/?aa9by3pcchba7
[Android Themes] weiti000:
- reserved -

Screenshots

Screenshots at android-hilfe.de/2996730-post3.html until i can post images.
[Android Themes] crybert:
Here are the Download Links:

[B][U]Download[/U][/B]
[URL="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27049289/RainbowPack/CrybernationColors%20-%20RainbowPack%205%2B1.zip"]Aroma Installer: 5 Colors + Default (13-Toggle)[/URL]

[URL="http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?g7ig9jzb48kud69http://"]BearBlack 13-Toggle[/URL]
[URL="http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?yd4x4wgrqmiaw4l"]BatBlue 13-Toggle[/URL]
[URL="http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?mmzvmu47a1106j3"]BeaverBlue 13-Toggle[/URL]
[URL="http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?osxagvd01817c7a"]GoatGreen 13-Toggle[/URL]
[URL="http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?d9z6yz3tqoddamg"]OstrichOrange[/URL]
[URL="http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?4uk3vh12tpt1bca"]OstrichOrange 13-Toggle[/URL]

[URL="http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?4p40l6igwkf63v4"]Default 13-Toggle[/URL]
[URL="http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?d990kv5z7gotq1m"]Default[/URL]
[Android Themes] chasemyass:
Crybernation beta3 is kqb based ? sorry i totally forgot, even if I used it for quite some time :(
[Android Themes] weiti000:
Most Colors are available for Crybernation 1.0.1

Download:

mediafire.com/?aa9by3pcchba7
[Android Themes] weiti000:
I released YakYellow and updatet GoatGreen.

Screenshots at android-hilfe.de/2996730-post3.html until i can post images.
[Android Themes] weiti000:
Update:

- BeaverBlue Fixed

- Rainbowpack 1.0.1 at bit.ly/RainbowPack1_0_1
[Android Apps and Games] stepic:
This application keeps track of SMS notifications of incoming calls when you are not available, each mobile operator provides a different name (Missed Call Alert).

- When you receive one of these SMS you will get a notification and a call log with your contacts is updated.

- Clicking on items in the list you can call, send SMS, see the contact details, etc...

- The Find SMS feature allows to clean up SMS messages by importing older calls in the program

This program is free and supported by ads banner and reviews on the Market.

If you are a customer of a not supported mobile operator, or have problems in the recognition of SMS, send me an e-mail with the text message that usually get.

NOTE:

- Any Task Killer can interfere with the operation of the application. Be sure to place the application on the white list.

- If you use Handcent SMS, GoSMS or other applications to manage SMS remember to activate priority option in Settings.

- Finally, to make the application work it must have been opened at least once after installation.

Please post a reply with the text of the SMS you usually receive to let me add support of your country.

Play Store
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] .Space Man:
Hey,

I rooted my galaxy s2 using http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1103399&highlight=wifi#

It works and what not but the issue I have is the wifi sometimes refuses to turn on and the hangs for unto 5 minutes before turning back off. During these 5 minutes I am unable to connect to a wifi, scan or do anything related to it at all.

I'm on LP3, i had a quick look through but all the posts made were just repeating my issue, no one actually got a reply.

Cheers!
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JJEgan:
SEARCH for Siyah kernel .

jje
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Thaw.Bytes:
Have you tried flashing a different modem?

To see if you still get the same problem
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JJEgan:
Modem does not contain WIFI Kernel does .

jje
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] ZeroRilix:
I posted this in the One X forums and have no replies and 63 views. I hope you guys can help me with my dilemma. I bought the Inspire off contract at the end of Feb last year and loved it. Qualified for my upgrade in Dec and upgraded to the Vivid near the end of Jan and love it. The One X is the phone I am wanting. That being said I've only used Snapdragon processors and stuck with HTC. Internally, the AT&T version is identical to the Vivid, minus the S4 processor. I will be selling my Inspire to help get this phone, as I have to pay full price whichever route I go. I will have the full price for either device next month and would like to know which I should get? I am really not concerned with LTE as my area won't have for at least another year and I'm always on WiFi. The T3X I can get for $670, the AT&T S4X I will be able to get for $550. Rooting does not concern me at this point, my Inspire is rooted and my Vivid is still locked and stock. Can you please help me with this decision? :confused: I don't want to have buyers remorse later this year. I look forward to hearing your opinions. :D
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] randomnameftw:
If you live in a Lte area or upcoming Lte area, this decision should

be a no-brainer imo. I personally would take the s4 soc over the tegra3.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] chaosjh:
s4x > t3x imho
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] ZeroRilix:
Nope, live outside of Memphis. They won't get LTE for at least another year, and we will get it prolly another year after that. I'm mostly on WiFi on my LTE capable Vivid.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] ZeroRilix:
So, regardless of being only on WiFi, you all would say still get the S4X? Cause I'm thinking the S4X will give me better battery life than the Vivid and the T3X combined. Not to mention the fact it will be cheaper than the T3X.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Red5:
I think you just answered your own question. :D
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] NardVa:
I say go with the S4 version since it will be cheaper. A lot of people will use their AT&T upgrade on the phone just to flip it on Ebay for a profit. You will be able to get the S4 version of the One X for under 500.00.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] randomnameftw:
Lol... Just wait for the at&t version. From what I've read, the one XL

has rock solid battery life with Lte. Hopefully that statement is true.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] mesasone:
I think it comes down to how much you value developer support. The One X looks like it will have solid third party developer support, and while I suspect the One XL on AT&T will also have decent support, the international versions of phones usually have significantly stronger developer support.

So, if you were to go with the One XL from AT&T, you'd be trading that extra level of dev support for a lower price, valid warranty, higher performance*, probably better battery life, and LTE (where available).

If support for the One X/XL is anything like the support for the Galaxy S/Captivate, I'd say holding out for the AT&T release of the One XL would be well worth it.

*On most benchmarks.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] randomnameftw:
Yeah with some luck and patience, you should be able to find one

for under 500$ once it's released.

Yup. Was going to pick one up on ebay a couple of days ago because

of that, but I decided I prioritize Lte and the s4 chip more.

It will have ****ty bloat and the logo but I'm cool with that. (It will get

removed :D). You're in a no-lose situation if you decide to pick up the

one x or one xl.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] ZeroRilix:
Coming from an Inspire prior to the Vivid, I do value XDA developer support. However, without S-Off I refuse to root my Vivid. However, we are real close to that now. Short term, I don't mind running the phone stock, as that's what I did with my Inspire and now Vivid. I just waited til Thanksgiving to root my Inspire. Once the S-Off process for the Vivid is out, I will finally root it. So, I don't mind using the S4X stock until S-Off, if it ever is, achieved.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Hunt3r.j2:
The Vivid's S-OFF process will require HTCDev Unlock to work, but with S-OFF you can conveniently change the **UNLOCKED** flag to **LOCKED**. ;)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] ZeroRilix:
Actually look in the Vivids dev section. We have a couple devs with an actual s-off procedure in beta right now
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] nativestranger:
One x. 4 cores vs 2 cores. Twice as fast. But please read through the list of issues over at the one x forums to see if you can live with those.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] redpoint73:
Um, no. That is not how multi-core processors work. Seems like you've fallen for marketing gimmickry, instead of actual facts. Few apps, if any are optimized to take advantage of 4 cores, so the only benefit you see is in running processes in the background, switching between tasks, and the like.

If you look at the benchmark comparisons, the S4 beats Tegra 3 in most of them. Some will argue that Tegra 3 wins in some benchmarks, so the difference is probably marginal, either way. But S4 may win for battery life, and Tegra 3 is also having lots of issues on the One X (as you mentioned).
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] BarryH_GEG:
I have the international One X. If I had a choice, I'd go with S4 over Teg3. It's a much more modern and efficient chip and from benchmarks performs almost equally. Battery life on the One X so far is pretty terrifying where the One S with the S4 chip seems to fare much better (but it doesn't have a mammoth display either). The international One X is also experiencing some bizarre graphics and performance issues which are probably Teg3 related as the Asus Prime had similar issues until it received a couple of updates. Since LTE is now integrated in to the SoC the One XL should probably have the best battery life of any LTE device currently available.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] iamthedudeman:
The Snapdragon S4 which is a Cortex A15 level SOC and a new micro architecture is more powerful. In most tasks the Snapdragon S4 will be the faster of the two. And in quite a few head to head tests, the S4 literally destroys The Tegra 3. The Tegra 3 is a Cortex A9. Like comparing a old Core 2 Duo to a Intel Sandy bridge chip.

The one XL with the snapdragon S4 will most likely be the fastest SOC CPU wise probably until next year or late this year other than other phones running that chip. There isn't a Cortex A15 due on the horizon until that time later this year. OMAP 5 will be such a SOC. And even it will probably be only on par with the snapdragon S4 not out gun it. And than you have the Exynos 5250 which is a quad core cortex A15 later this year or next year. But than again Qualcomm has the Snapdragon S4 Pro, a quad-core A15 level chip to match it.

That means the Galaxy S3 will still be most likely running a 32nm-based Cortex A9 Exynos mobile processor, the Exynos 4212. The Exynos A15 based 5250 will not be ready until later this year. There is a slight chance it will make it into the Galaxy S3 but the chances are slim since they have not produced any in any numbers for production and the S3 will be released soon. The Exynos 4212 is similar to the Tegra 3 but with a better GPU.

The iphone 5 will run the A5X a dual core Cortex A9 with a quad core GPU at 32nm. Again, older microarchitecture.

So essentially the Snapdragon S4 will make the One Xl one of the most powerful if not the most powerful smartphone for the foreseeable future. Regardless of the Samsung S3 and the iphone 5 if they run the above mentioned SOC's. Which most likely they will.

Hardware wise the One xl will have few equals. Other than the 16GB of memory, it is a beast.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] redpoint73:
There are some reports of issues with the One X international version connecting properly to AT&T's HSPA network, despite having the proper band compatibility (850/1900 MHz). Also, Tegra 3 is having some video corruption and other issues.

I too was slightly considering the international version for use on AT&T, due to the increased storage, and potentially more developer support. And also probably better battery life by using HSPA instead of LTE. But the issues with the international version so far have me deciding against it.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] iamthedudeman:
I was worried about the 16 gb storage as well until i used the one XL for the few days that I actually had in our offices. Dropbox is so tightly integrated with The OS that you don't even know that you don't have more than 16 GB on the phone that's how integrated it is.

I uploaded a bunch of photos to the gallery and every time I went to the gallery to retrieve them they were instantly they're like the pictures were on the memory the whole time! don't worry you have plenty of space as long as you keep your photos and videos to drop box. and 25gb is plenty
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Hunt3r.j2:
Yes, I'm saying that juopunut S-OFF uses HTCDev unlock as a part of its exploit, you need your bootloader to be unlocked before you can get S-OFF.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] belyle:
Don't know what type of data plan you're on, but consider this: if you get the international T3 version, you will have the 3GB soft-cap applied to an unlimited plan. If you stick with the S4/LTE version, you get 5GB soft-cap. That's a key thing for me, anyway.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] :
He wont have LTE either, so he will probably fit in with the 97% of people are fine with 3GB on HSPA+ speeds.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] BarryH_GEG:
I agree with everything you said with one exception. The GPU that Samsung's rumored to be using with the SGS3 is either the Mali T-658 or a hybrid of the PowerVR SGX. Either will blow both S4 and Teg3 away. In the dual-core world Exynos blew away both Teg2 and and the S3 so I'd expect the 4212 plus a more powerful GPU to once again set the bar. But, outside of benchmarks, how fast does a phone need to be when the weakest links are apps and the UI?

Besides, it's ugly. At least in pictures.

Not so for me. I popped the SIM in, it populated the APN, and I was good to go. It gets HSPA/HSPA+ speeds equal to or maybe a tad better than my i9100. SMS/MMS works out-of-the-box which was a pain in the ass on the i9100.

I'm paying $10 a month for 3GB of HSPA/HSPA+ data. I have a 3G UK G-Tab 10.1 that's also on a $10 3GB data plan. So paying $20 between them for 6GB of data helps subsidize my toy addiction ;)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] ZeroRilix:
Yes, I am fine. As I said in my op I live in Covington, TN, which is north of Memphis, TN. LTE is not available in Memphis, let alone Covington. LTE would come into TN via Nashville first, then Knoxville, then Memphis, and then almost a year and a half from now we will see LTE in Covington. I am also exclusively on WiFi, as I only have the 200MB data plan, and I have access to WiFi at home and at work. I will be getting the AT&T HTC One X next month. A while ago, with light-moderate usage, on this LTE phone, the Vivid, in a non-LTE area I went over a whole 24 hours on a single charge. Usually I have full moderate usage and get around 18 hours and am plugging in to charge with around 15% give or take a few percentage points. With that kind of battery on an S3, I can't wait to see what I will get on an S4.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] redpoint73:
I read about connectivity issues (international version of One X on AT&T's network) on one of the tech websites (can't find the article right now), so its interesting to hear the flipside. Looks like this AT&T user was getting slow speeds, but simply changing the APN fixed him up.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1586298

Still leaves me a bit wary of spending $600+ on an unlocked device, if I'm not completely certain it will get good data connectivity to AT&T. Also, still debating LTE speed versus battery life, among other things. You're supposed to be making my internal debate easier, not harder, lol!
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] mrvirginia:
great read^^ ;)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] BarryH_GEG:
It's a little early to speak in absolutes, don't you think? You're comparing something that's in release to something we've only heard rumors and speculation about. Samsung fabricates their own chips, they are the only phone OEM to do so. I'm guessing with design-to-build experience they've got some skills others don't. And TSMC both delayed S4 and is experiencing yield issues so all's not rosy in S4 land. You could be right about the S4, but until the 4212 is released and tested it's a little soon to declare victory.

P.S. - I have the Teg3 One X and would take an HSPA S4 version over it if it were available. I'm not a fanboi of any SoC vendor.

---------- Post added at 11:45 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:36 AM ----------

It depends on the plan you're on. There are three: 3G, 4G, and LTE. Each use different APNs and those have to match the plan that's provisioned in your account. Most AT&T data issues are caused when the APNs don't align with the plan. I'm on the data for-non Smartphones plan which is actually the simplest of the three (and gets the same HSPA+ speeds). When AT&T released their version of the SGS2 my APNs got automatically updated and that created havoc. And their new APNs became the default so I had to manually rebuild them back to the original. Other than that, the only problem I ever had was MMS on the i9100 which works fine on the HOX.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] BarryH_GEG:
Of course they are. Qualcomm deserves credit for focusing on LTE integration and are reaping the rewards from it. Asus is doing the same thing by using S4 in LTE devices and Teg3 everywhere else. Qualcomm's stock has appreciated over 25% since January.

Being an engineer you can also appreciate the value of good execution. Using an example from the auto industry, identically spec'd engines from different manufacturers can have very different outputs based on other variables. Same thing with bench HP and HP to the wheels with drivetrain loss playing a major role. That's the component that's missing from any comparison to the next Exynos chip even though, on paper, the S4 is a more modern design. On paper the S3 should have performed at least equal to the Exynos and it didn't; by a long shot.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] iamthedudeman:
Look at the Andatech S4 performance review link i posted. They test the S4 along with a S3, which is a second gen S3 along with the galaxy S2. The S3 Snapdragon more than competes with the Exynos.

There isnt a thing Samsung can do with a Exynos cortex A9 that will allow it to compete with the S4 besides adding more cores. It is not like going from a Cortex A8 to a Cortex A9.

"If you want to abstract by one more level: Krait will be faster regardless of application, regardless of usage model. You're looking at a generational gap in architecture here, not simply a clock bump."

The Exynos in the Galaxy S2 is pitted against the Snapdragon S3 8660. A newer version of the S3 from the 8620.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5559/...mance-preview-msm8960-adreno-225-benchmarks/2

Here is the Samsung S2 benched against a 1ghz older S3 the 8620. The Exynos is clocked at 1.2 Ghz.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4686/samsung-galaxy-s-2-international-review-the-best-redefined/14

The Snapdragon S4 is a general jump in design. They literally leapfrogged a few generations of design with the A15. The numbers are ridiculous. Just absurd compared to the Cortex A9 designed chips. Its not like the Exynos is any more complex or better designed than the S3. Or perform better. From a design standpoint, the S3 is a better designed chip. Not the Exynos. Let alone compared to the S4.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] BarryH_GEG:
First, I'm enjoying the conversation not trying to challenge you (or anyone else) or change your opinion. You've overlooked the S4's Achilles heel; it's GPU. Here's an article you'll find interesting published by a fellow engineer who works for Google. In it she explains the graphics workings of Android and, in short, that the GPU and more specifically memory b/w plays a bigger role in performance than the CPU. Let's face it, little out there will tax Teg3, S4, or the Exynos 4212 on the CPU side.

https://plus.google.com/10505198573...8x93s#105051985738280261832/posts/2FXDCz8x93s

That said, Adreno 225 is basically just a refreshed 220. Memory b/w has doubled but it was coming from at least a 25% deficit compared to Mali and it's still behind Teg3. So I'd be willing to bet the next Mali GPU will run rings around the 225. Here's a quote from the same AnandTech articles you linked to.

From a compute standpoint however, Adreno 225 looks identical to Adreno 220. The big difference is thanks to the 8690's 28nm manufacturing process, Adreno 225 can now run at up to 400MHz compared to 266MHz in Adreno 220 designs. A 50% increase in GPU clock frequency combined with a doubling in memory bandwidth compared to Snapdragon S3 gives the Adreno 225 a sizable advantage over its predecessor...

...Limited by Vsync the Adreno 225 can actually deliver similar performance to the PowerVR SGX 543MP2 in Apple's A5. However if we drive up the resolution, avoid vsync entirely and look at 720p results the Adreno 225 falls short. Its performance is measurably better than anything else available on the Android side (phones on the market as of February) in the Egypt benchmark, however the older Pro test still shows the SGS2's Mali-400 implementation as quicker. The eventual move to Adreno 3xx GPUs will likely help address this gap.

So when you factor in both CPU and GPU performance (separating them isn’t realistic) the fat lady hasn't sung yet as to which SoC will be the performance champion. Comparisons have been done between the S4 One S and Teg3 One X but they aren’t comparable because of the screen resolution differences. It’ll be fascinating to see the benchmarks between both versions of the One X.