yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[T-Mobile myTouch 4G Slide] mikereidis:
Learn something new every day. :) But I think it was more a joke about the very popular meme than mis-hearing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolcat

I know the theory, but I've never believed that low power, under 100 mw transmitters get damaged too often. But I imagine a final output transistor on a chip can't take as much abuse as an external one.

Documents about these chips are "very secret". I can't even find much on Chinese sites that specialise in proprietary documents. The official vague block diagrams can't be trusted either.

But if the transmit and receive pins were the same pins, I'm pretty sure we would have achieved FM transmit long ago on the most popular Broadcom chips, on devices that support receive. That said, I think the much rarer Qualcomm Tavarua chips use the same pins, and there are no transmit reports on them.

I've looked at schematics of some phones, and I've seen FM antenna pins specifically labelled as "Rx", so that's another clue in favor of the idea that Rx and Tx pins are different. This might also be easier to achieve on the chip.

I wonder too if it's easier to achieve FCC etc certification if the hardware design specifically makes FM transmit impossible.
[T-Mobile myTouch 4G Slide] cj chitwood:
I'm certain it is easier to achieve, as long as they can certify to the FCC that no more than so many milliwatts will be pushed out. Then again, with as many transmitters as there are that are available to the public, it can't be that hard to do.

We keep talking about Tx and Rx pins. In my limited experience with chips, I'm wondering if these are antenna pins, or activation pins. I also wouldn't be surprised if it was that some chips have a mode select pin (high is one mode, low is another) that could be labeled both as Tx and Rx, and each mode requires a separate other pin to have a certain voltage on it to provide power for that section of the chip. Alternatively, to have two mode select pins, again whichever one is hot selects the mode, and the third pin provides power for both modes, and thus is labeled Tx Rx even if the mode select pin isn't attached.

Either way, if pinouts are so secretive about this, it's pointless to discuss pins because they literally could be anything. I think however that you having seen the innards and/or schematics of these devices means that you would know more than I as I have yet to even crack mine open :)

Oh and the lolcat thing... no, you really can type "adb lolcat" in command prompt and it runs a logcat. The explanation for this was literally that they said "logcat" so fast it sounded like "lolcat". I am fully aware of the meme, http://icanhascheezburger.com :) and have forwarded quite a few on to the wife even.
[T-Mobile myTouch 4G Slide] NovoRei:
Any development on this?

MT4G with Royal Ginger 3.0 does not work.
[T-Mobile myTouch 4G Slide] Limewirelord:
Nope. Sony did merge some changes recently for FM Radio support though. Maybe some of that code could be utilized.
[T-Mobile myTouch 4G Slide] emeries11:
message transmit

Hi ..

I'm from Griffith NSW... I have a lot of people interested and curious on an app called transmit... Or something similar... Its been know to receive messages sent from an unknown device and it allows you to edit the message and send it using the mobile number that you received it from..,. Do u guys know anything about that? Some sort of transmitter .radio .. Cheers Jarrod
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pastasauce:
Hey guys. I'm a Canadian. I would gladly pay for services such as Hulu (which isn't offered outside of the US) and Netflix (which has an awful, awful library in Canada). However, I cannot. I've tried looking for services that perhaps I can use, but it seems that TV providers don't want my money.

So, are there any good sites to watch on-demand tv shows that's updated frequently? I'd prefer to stream rather than download and then watch.

Sorry if this is against the rules, but I made an effort to actually find services I can pay for.

Thanks!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ubernode54:
Possibly pay for a decent vpn service that has endpoints in USA then you can have Hulu and US Netflix listings.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Ploxorz:
I know copyright laws are much more lenient in Canada, but I'm not sure about xda's policies on this type of question but Google is your friend you will be able to find something depending on what you want.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] anton2009:
Have you tried HBOGo, Showtime, AMC, or FX?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] XtreemDroid:
CTV.CA has lots of shows in their online video player.

As well as all the other sister channels.

Just make sure u view whole site not mobile site.. links for other channels are at bottom of TV's main site..
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ceribaen:
The issue with lack of services in Canada is a combination of CRTC regulations, ancient backwater copyright legislation (which in same cases is a help and others a hindrance... ie under current law PVRs are grey, which is my understanding why TiVO pretty much never came to Canada), and the fact that the online streaming rights are purchased by CTV, Global, etc - who are under the same umbrella corporations as our options for internet and TV service providers.

So they basically keep companies like Netflix from being able to acquire anything decent (though I actually don't mind the Netflix catalogue these days, and if you travel between US, UK and Canada - its nice to have the local libraries available whereever) so that you can't cut the cable, or are still forced to go through their channels anyway.

So your best best is to check the individual networks webpages/apps to see what they have available and if that's good enough. Anything else and you get into greymarket options (if not straight 'illegal'), such as VPN service to bypass geo-ip restrictions.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jerdog:
A number of good options have been posted. We do not encourage breaking copyrights here at XDA so I am closing this thread before we get to the point.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] projeto56:
So i know the closest phone to ours in terms of hardware, is the Galaxy W right?

And guess what? They got the CM9 port this week.

So i guess this could help some developers to port it to our phone?

*_*

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1576874

Here's the link btw
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GuestK00250:
i thought it has been mention a lot of times although same specs but it is not possible to port as the mobo is all different
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] projeto56:
Yeah, I'm not thinking on getting their rom and trying to install it on my phone.

I meant get their base and develop something similar on our phone, using the same cpu/gpu drivers, wich i think are the main problem we have right now.

I'm no developer, but i don't think that this is impossible.:)
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kellermanv:
Their original developer is porting it as we speak, so maybe we should continue the talk here ?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kurniawan77:
If dev is porting... new thread will open

Hereby thread closed!
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stuffynet:
Go arco. He brought CM7 to my old phone (htc wildfire) so it is just a matter of time until we have CM9 for our S+. :D
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GuestK00250:
Lol? its not close :D
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] projeto56:
Where did you heard this?

Sent from my GT-I9001 using non premium xda app :'(
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kellermanv:
The porter is arco, look on yarde's cm7 development thread, he is trying to help us. ^^

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=24611096&postcount=523
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] projeto56:
Yeah, but they are focused on CM7 and the released version for the Galaxy W is the CM9.

That's why i think it's a important release
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] djdana:
Did you read the thread arco68 is talking about ics -->cm9:)
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kellermanv:
He is porting his version of CM9 dude, what's so hard to understand ?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rayiskon:
u guys sound like a bunch of kids debating about who is gonna build a space shuttle , this thread should be closed and deleted from dev section.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wintel_mac:
Just like a kindergarden^^

Please read this and click the link in my signature. Thanks.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] projeto56:
So, they are developing both CM7 and CM9?

I tought it was just the CM7.

Well, anyway we have something to base ourselves to make a port now :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chasemyass:
damn I loooled so hard on ur sig...1`st time I saw it I was like wtf I`m not a fkin n00b then I stepped in and surprise surprise ... I`ve found that somehow I was a n00b ROFL and now it`s just fkin one of the awesome clips i`ve evah seen and yes I`m totally on the wrong forum :)))))))))) I`m out for some p0rn now :)))))))))))))
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] projeto56:
Maybe i'm a noob. I'm not a develorper, but does it mean i shouldn't make part of this forum?

First of all, i've registered here not to create stuff, but to show my apreciation for the work of people who do create it.

I've donated to estimulate the development of other projects on other devices, but aparently people of the 9001 section don't actually care about this kind of user ( aka noobs).

And when i try to point that other developers managed to get CM9 on a phone that is very similar to ours you react that way? Seriously, you didn't became more of a man when you answered like a dickhead.

Anyway, i'm sorry for trying to help out the development of our device by bringing unharmful information.

C ya.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wintel_mac:
Your thread is in the wrong section. It should go into 9000 General section and the thread title should start with [9001]. That's the rules that were set up by XDA officials for us and our device. Not very handy but that's it.

This topic is not new and was discussed several times already in various other threads here. Ironically in the Cyanogenmod porting thread arco68, who ported CM9 for Galaxy W, has been around for two days and started to analyse out device. If you searched and read a bit, you would have found that. So this thread is a duplicate.

And thanks for the dickhead.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] projeto56:
Better than just calling me a noob right?

Why can't people answer this way to all users, no matter if they are developers or not?

Anyway just close/delete/purge/burn the damn thread
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] djdana:
I can understand this reaction.

It's in my opinion the result of lacking our own general forum.

it's a shame that if i want to read topics in the general forum i have to use the search button to see i9001 topics.

When the Samsung Galaxy S Advance arrives does it get a subforum in the i9000 forum? if this is so this wil make things again more confusing.

And if there is a administrator then close this thread:confused:

But on topic there wil be a thread from arco68 ? about porting cm9.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kellermanv:
WRONG.

i9001 Android Development page is on the wrong category. In no way shape or form we should post our problems on i9000 general forum because our phones are not even SIMILAR besides the display.

I see it only 1 way. Make us our own forum section, or never ever question where the hell we posted our problems.

This post is not against you, it's against the moderator team. :D
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kubson1999:
I agree with that. What are similar, these two phones? In addition to the display, and the manufacturer? There is a lot more CPU, graphics, sound chip, it is different. The support of the developers I will not mention. Why the support? Our forum is a subdivision in the section for the i9000. I'm all for creating a separate division for SGS +. It's probably not a problem for the administration board. It will make it operate in the forum. Once again I repeat: they are two different phones.

Sorry for bad English

Wysłane z mojego GT-I9001 za pomocą Tapatalk
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] annqx:
Hmm. I think we can be kinda grateful that we have our own dev section. Look at other phones, not even having an own dev section.

Not sure why xda is so stingy about having only limited sub forums tho, but I guess they don't want to have dead sections.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fadzlihellmuth:
Let the devs focus on CM7 first, make it even perfect, as the issue is the audio files. after that they can work on CM9 or hopefully arco will work straight to CM9.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bogac94:
In arco's build audio is working properly. İf arco port cm9 us successfully we can solve the audio problem in cm7
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] arco68:
Fixing audio in CM7 should be pretty easy. Backporting the following patch from CM9 should take care of that.

https://github.com/CyanogenMod/andr...mmit/385084ba6ddeac707c30ddfd39d9d1f54e3002b3
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AndrolinRoot:
Do you think we can get cmod ?

When can we relese it ,in a year??:what:
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kellermanv:
lolololololol, you just fixed what skywalker was trying to do for the past months. :))
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] [GR]Frostbyte:
Yeah, according to skywalker, backporting the CM9 audio caused several other things to break down.. Although he did mention that he got some basic audio function..

Though skywalker tried a CM7-CM9 hybrid, maybe pure CM9 won't have such issues?

-sigh- if I had a spare i9001, I'd mail it for development..
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] [GR]Frostbyte:
I believe it has to be the same piece of code. What I have hopes on though, is that things might be different; since skywalker tried with a CM7 base - while arco tries CM9 from scratch.. I'm no coder, so I can't put my finger on it though.. I still believe we need to find a way to get an i9001 in the hands of arco/maclaw. But first, as I said in a newspawned thread, somebody needs to take the initiative to make a thread and organize the whole thing.. Preferably a trusted xda member.. Then maybe that's the first step on making our wish come true..

PS: You might say I have a taste on the non serious side of avatars.. lol
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AndrolinRoot:
Arco had written in his forum that he had two bricked galaxy w...

So we need more galaxy s plus:D:D

Sent from galaxy s plus

-1,8ghz

-MoonRom 4

-skyhigh kernel 1.4d

-ics theme 4.0 by RavoxX
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] [GR]Frostbyte:
Doesn't matter how many devices he'd need, the first step is to get him the first one and then we'll support his development..

There are two ways to do it, as far as I can tell now..

- Either arco opens up a new CM9 thread and people donate directly to him, so he can get an i9001.

- Or, someone who's well known and trusted in the i9001 community, makes a thread/project to gather donations and distribute devices to developers like arco.

I surelly bet you, that even if he doesn't need additional devices, people (including me) will still donate even after the work has been completed. :)

PS: And since I wrote already enough, and I don't want to get any more repetitive, anyone who wishes to carry the responsibility of this project; feel free to step up - we'll support. ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] azalex86:
Hey folks,

Newbie question: Haven't screwed around with rooting and the like in a loooong time.

I recently installed the ICS leak (through .exe) and then rooted it.

What would be the easiest way to obtain BLN access?

Can I apply the Dag kernel to the ICS leak, or is there an almost stock kernel w/ BLN added in that I can just flash over?

Thanks!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jpeg42:
Do not do that. No bln until the kernel source code is released. For now try noled in the market.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] azalex86:
Alrighty -- Thanks much!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Totòòò:
That **** app spies on txt u send/receive etc id avoid it and wait until custom kernel comes out
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] toonarme:
Of course it does. How does it know when to light the LED's if it can't access your SMS?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Totòòò:
Access is different from SAVING your txts in some icloud storage they got;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] lowspeed:
You got proof?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] justinmcnairy:
They taking preorder of Otterbox Defender for Galaxy Note for 39.99 instead of 59.99 at the official Otterbox online retail. Expect arrival date will be April 20, 2012 as stated in the website.

http://www.mobilecityonline.com/wireless/store/productdetail.asp?productid=29962

UPDATED (4/9/2012)

I just forgot about the physical button on the international Note. AT&T Note don't have one, but 4 touch button. The link above designed for the International N7000 only. Sorry, my bad!

I think they will going to release one for the AT&T Note the same day as International version.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] kornklown69:
thought about pre order a few weeks ago.... problem is.... They pushed it back it was originally on there website for the 6th... don't think they really know when it's going to be available
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jshinn1:
Has there been any word about the Commuter Case yet I thought they usually put those out first?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] justinmcnairy:
Otterbox stated commuter will come first, then defender.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] justinmcnairy:
Oh well. Since it 40 buck instead of 60, I already preorder it. Otterbox did say it will be available in the coming week, which mean it will be here this month anytime
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Phoneguy589:
Not sure if there is any difference but that case says it is for the international version not for the Att i717.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jshinn1:
Ok awesome
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Sinful Animosity:
Thinking about getting the otterbox. Unfortunately I'm torn between the kraken and the OB. is there any comparison?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] justinmcnairy:
There is no design difference between those 2. It still the same. The only difference is the processor. I don't think Otterbox going to break it down into 2 separate Note case. And beside, I have a Reiko case (which is close to otterbox quality) which is designed for N7000 and it fit just fine with the I717
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] corey_r:
one has a home button and the other does not...... Kind of a major difference
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] justinmcnairy:
yea, I forgot about that...damn! lol At least the 2 version might release the same day I hope since the case fit the Note perfectly...all they have to do is cut a little rectangle hole on the screen protection for the International.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] hegemytouch:
The kraken is sweet I can't wait till that comes out.

Galaxy Note
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] bizzkitt:
If you look at picture "4" on "Myvoicecomm.com" for the "Galaxy Note Otterbox Defender Case"

myvoicecomm.com/cell-phone-mobile-device-accessory/170204/

(sorry a noob..cannot post links yet).

The screen protector has no cut out for the International version's home button. However, this seems to be the same model number: SAM2-N7000-20-E4OTR , posted on mobilecity. It could be possible that Otterbox might be using the same case for the International and AT&T version.

I hope it becomes available soon....I using the fake Otterbox from Amazon

For me, the silicon is just too slippery..and the buttons built in the silicon are way too small. Feels cheap...at least in my opinion.

---------- Post added at 12:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:09 PM ----------

Amazon started listing the Kracken:

amazon.com/gp/product/B0077IQD7M/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?ie=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER

As much as like the design, I need the built in screen protector that is going to be offered from the Otterbox Defender. Wish they did that with the Dell Streak 5.

I cannot put a screen protector on without going through at least one...and I still have a bubble or two.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Leo2005:
Looks like it is never going to come out. MyVoiceComm changed ETA again for may 4: http://www.myvoicecomm.com/cell-phone-mobile-device-accessory/170204/
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] kornklown69:
theory is correct they pushed date again lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dakleenupman:
Anyone here get one yet? Either preorder or direct from OtterBox?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] VonEsch:
Otterbox.com shows the international version, and they show it with sold screen protector. It will fit the i717
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] reubenray:
I received this via e-mail today. In the email it has a ship date of May 16.

http://www.otterbox.com/Samsung-Gal...1&spJobID=141759234&spReportId=MTQxNzU5MjM0S0
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] webdave:
There is a chance it may come with a screen for both models. My Commuter came with 2 screen protectors, 1 for each version.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] *Omnipresent*:
Just ordered my defender and got free FedEx ground shipping:cool:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] newyorksabre:
awesome case, Ill personally order the att defender version when its out.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] *Omnipresent*:
Otterbox's website states that the defender is compatible with both the International and At&t note.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] dakleenupman:
Yeo. No reason why it wouldn't work. You can always press either home button through the built -in screen protector. However, it would be nice to have a full screen protector and I do believe it does. If not, a small price to pay for Otterbox goodness.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] *Omnipresent*:
The defender case does come with a full screen protector, according to these pics on the otterbox website.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Gtabuser:
I went ahead and preordered it for my at&t note with my fingers crossed that the screen protector is correct. I'll post pics when i get it if you guys want to clarify before ordering.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] OpenThirdEye:
Woohoo! My Defender case shipped this evening and will be here on the 9th!

I'll do my best to post pics! Can I do that with my low post-count?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] JediSooner:
Where did you pre-order yours?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] circuit.007:
I've never had an Otter box case before none of my phones were worth protecting. I want to know your guys opinion on the defender vs the commuter. is it because if the increased protection also do you think the defender will be much more thicker than the commuter?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] OpenThirdEye:
I pre-ordered mine directly from the Otterbox website as soon as I got the email from them saying they were available for pre-order on 4 May. I guess they were able to ship sooner than expected since they said 16 May in the email.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] JediSooner:
IMO, the Commuter case is great if you don't want to wear it on your belt. I bought this one to hold me over until the Defender ships and it's great, I just need a holster so I bought the Defender too. The Commuter case fits super-tight and doesn't add much bulk at all. It fits mine even with the glas.t screen protector. The Commuter did come with its own standard screen protector, but I'm sticking with the glas.t.

Cool... I ordered from Amazon, hope it ships early too!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Ceasare:
Dude! Awesome! Post the amazon link?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] JediSooner:
Defender: http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B007PYMG06/ref=mp_s_a_1?qid=1336510795&sr=8-1

Commuter: http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B007PYMFZ2/ref=mp_s_a_2?qid=1336510795&sr=8-2