yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] pileot:
Lol, guess were both right, in a way, depending on how you look at it. Thanks for the education!

Theroetically, DVI and HDMI should both do 1080p no problem. In fact you can get HDMI to DVI cables usually used from going from a computer into a tv... only issue is it does not pass through the sound.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] coquipr:
well i went a head and contact accell and they told me to return the unit as it seems is defective.i went and bought the asus micro to vga converter and it worked right away when plugged in.so it seems that the accell converter was not working from micro hdmi to vga but from hdmi to vga was.im happy since i need it for tonight for a church presentation.so amazon here it goes back this accell defective thing.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Dis86:
Some time ago i saw in a review a pretty cool boot animation in B/W with some zombies or something like that.. can someone point me out what rom is that from or where can i download it?

P.s. would it be usable in the new Resurrection Remix v1.1?

P.p.s. Is there any place where i could download custom boot animation? :P

Thnx in advanced
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JJEgan:
THEMES SECTION .

jje
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bala_gamer:
Why not try digging the same review article for some more details?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Dis86:
The fact is that I don't remember which review was that :D
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Dis86:
Damn :( didn't think about that sorry. Is there any way to move the thread in the themes section?
[Motorola Droid 3] clorox.bleach:
I am having problems getting GSM service in the ICS roms. I currently have service with AT&T and I am unable to get a signal. I am currently running the Gingerbread MavRom and I have calling service as well at blazing fast 3G service. I did the radio reflashing in FastBoot as well as the build.prop tweaks in Mav Rom and it worked perfectly. When I did the same in ICS, I was faced with problems.

After flashing the radio, the phone booted normally, but when I went to Settings>About phone, The model was still the same and I had no baseband, it was unknown. When I hit phone status, there was no ESN, IMEI, and alot of the other spots also said unknown.

And after copying the modded build.prop file to the system folder and restarting, I could not get past the Boot Animation. I tried this in several ICS roms all with the same result...

Can anybody tell me what I'm doing wrong?
[Motorola Droid 3] ifailprettyhard:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1560519 scroll down and you will find the GSM fix just replace the build prop with this one and you.should be good.
[HD2 Android Themes and Apps] elesbb:
Hello,

From my understanding, when i edit any apk, i should delete the public.xml file as from my understanding it is supposed to get created upon compiling. I remember deleting public.xml from CM7 theme apks and not having a problem. Is it because framework-res.apk is a system apk? Can someone please clarify when and when not to delete the public.xml file?

Thanks all :)

PS: This is a recycled thread :) i ran into this question trying to solve the previous contents of this thread, which i have figured out, now i ran into above question.
[HD2 Android Themes and Apps] elesbb:
Bump
[HD2 Android Themes and Apps] jsmccabe78:
1- have you ever seen anyone else doing this successfully? if so post the thread and we'll take a look. i haven't, though have not looked really.

2- which xml file is it?
[HD2 Android Themes and Apps] elesbb:
No i havent, if someone already has done it, would i be posting another thread asking how to do it? idts.

And its one of the keyguard xml files found in framework-res.apk I think its the keyguard screen unlock.xml Found in red layout.

heres a snippet of what i think needs to be edited.

<com.android.internal.widget.DigitalClock android:id="@id/time" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:layout_marginLeft="20.0dip" android:layout_marginTop="15.0dip" android:layout_marginRight="20.0dip" android:layout_alignParentLeft="true" android:layout_alignParentTop="true">
<TextView android:textAppearance="?textAppearanceMedium" android:textSize="56.0sp" android:ellipsize="none" android:gravity="bottom" android:id="@id/timeDisplay" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:layout_marginBottom="6.0dip" android:singleLine="true" android:shadowColor="#c0000000" android:shadowDx="0.0" android:shadowDy="0.0" android:shadowRadius="3.0" />
<TextView android:textAppearance="?textAppearanceMedium" android:textSize="18.0sp" android:ellipsize="none" android:gravity="bottom" android:id="@id/am_pm" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="fill_parent" android:layout_marginLeft="4.0dip" android:singleLine="true" android:shadowColor="#c0000000" android:shadowDx="0.0" android:shadowDy="0.0" android:shadowRadius="3.0" />
</com.android.internal.widget.DigitalClock>
[HD2 Android Themes and Apps] elesbb:
Okay after more googling, i think the file i listed above is for pattern unlock. I think the regular lockscreen is as keyguard_screen_tab_unlock.xml. FYI this is for a CM7 ROM. Im gonna edit the above file, (somethin obvious like background color or something) to see if i notice a difference.
[HD2 Android Themes and Apps] elesbb:
UPDATE: I figured out exactly what i want to do. It was that file keyguard_screen_tab.xml. Editing that gave me what i wanted. I have a new question for pro themers out there,

From my understanding, when i edit any apk, i should delete the public.xml file as from my understanding it is supposed to get created upon compiling. I remember deleting public.xml from CM7 theme apks and not having a problem. Is it because framework-res.apk is a system apk? Can someone please clarify when and when not to delete the public.xml file?

Thanks all :)
[HD2 Android Themes and Apps] hannemaster:
I'm not really pro, but I can tell from experience, when you Edit only classes.dex or add/edit only png's you do not need to remove public.xml.

Actually I never removed public.xml before..

what you do need to remove is Resources.arsc when you modify any XML.
[Motorola Droid X2] three west:
anybody try the new TBH hotspot hack that comes in zip form instead of using radiocomm?
[Motorola Droid X2] three west:
ok, so I guess maybe I'll give it a shot myself since the soak doesn't seem to be coming
[Motorola Droid X2] Maximinus I:
I tried to flash it but it aborted. I assume your talking about the d3 zip correct?
[Motorola Droid X2] three west:
yeah, just hadn't gotten around to trying it myself, was hoping it would work since it was just simpler than the radiocomm solution.
[Motorola Droid X2] Maximinus I:
Radiocomm isn't to bad just follow the directions and double check before flashing. Worst case you have to sbf and start over.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] nabbed:
I tried the two aosp ics builds before reverting to el29 stock modded by Calkulin.

Both CM9 and Codename Android were much laggier and slower than either el29 or FC ics builds by Samsung.

It appears that Samsung code uses gpu hardware acceleration much more efficiently than generic AOSP builds. At first, I thought it was going to be kernel dependent, but after using FC rogue kernels, I still the same slowdowns and jerkiness in the aosp builds.

So, what gives? What is Samsung/Sprint doing that is different from aosp acceleration by google?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] jamesey:
What are you talking about? the hardware acceleration is for the browser. Run browsermark on GB than ICS aosp or not ICS rules the roost
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] nabbed:
Browser in Codename and CM9 is much jerkier than in official Sprint/Samsung builds.

Everything appears to be faster in those.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] DaKlown:
There is no source code available yet for the kernels right now. The "FC rogue kernels" that you are basing your opinion off of are just repacks which means they are just the stock kernel with a customer recovery added so people can still flash zips files and make backups. Also cm9 alpha and codename both run pretty smooth on this phone especially for a rom in alpha status... I'm hoping that you are not considering them slow because the FC builds scroll really really fast because that is not hardware acceleration nor a feature... its a bug due to touch lag.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] nabbed:
1) "FC rogue kernels" were supposed to increase performance, since they were stock Samsung/Sprint based. But they don't. Aosp builds are very jerky and laggy in terms of scrolling on my phone with those.

2) Sorry, those CM9 and Codename run very poorly compared to - a) ICS touchwiz in ics leaks, 2) Nova launcher in ics leaks. Any other combination runs jerky.

This means that

1) aosp with any combination of launchers doesn't use gpu acceleration (or any similar effect).

2) Only touchwiz or nova launcher with ics Samsung leaks use the gpu acceleration.

---also, since the FC kernels don't provide any benefits to aosp builds, it is not the kernels that provide the benefit, but rather the rom build apps. And only Samsung/Sprint build ones.

--- Nova Launcher, in this particular case, uses gpu acceleration of the mali gpu of the exynos processor, unlike aosp build launchers. That's what the results indicate.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] DaKlown:
Increase performance how? Its a repack.... not much you can do without the source except maybe add a few simple scripts here and there? The purpose of the FC Repacks has been just what I said. To give people a custom recovery option. The "FC rogue kernels" are not based on the stock kernel. It is the stock kernel with a custom recovery, Bootanimation Support, and Init.d Support.

I haven't experienced This "jerkyness" that you speak of on any AOSP roms on this phone. I don't use Nova though I use Apex launcher.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] nabbed:
Increase performance due to Samsung optimization over aosp kernels. What else did you think, some magical kernel?

If you haven't experiences "jerkiness". you are either a @#$@#$ or a #$@#$1234. Take your pick.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] beserker15:
You're conclusion doesn't make that much sense. We currently don't have an aosp ics kernel. It's the stock Samsung one ductaped together with the aosp roms. I personally have not noticed the increased jerkyness either. Code name feels smoother to me, with cm9 and touchwiz about tied. I know gpu acceleration is working though because I use dolphin browser and it sure is a lot smoother than when I used it in gingerbread.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] nabbed:
Look forget anything I said about kernels. **** them, alright?

AOSP roms are goddamn choppy as hell compared to samsung leaks. That means aosp builds don't utilize samsung hardware to its full potential.

Is this clear enough for you?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] slick4mitch:
I think you are right, I tried CM9 for 2 days and I can feel the lag, also with the ICS leaks but with GB everthing just flies, so I say this GB FTW! ;)
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] nabbed:
The touchwiz launcher and the nova launcher were nearly as smooth for me in ICS leaks as a touchwiz gb launcher. Also, the browser in ICS leaks is just as smooth as the one in GB, while the aosp browsers were really really choppy in both scrolling and zooming.

Does that sound about right?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] KCRic:
I think what he was trying to tell you is "Obvious fact is obvious. You're comparing apples to oranges, thanks for another pointless thread".
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] The Root:
The touchwiz background software is an accelerator. Aosp strips it out so you aren't maximizing the hardware. That's why i only run touchwiz based roms. It's like having a high end graphics card with no software support.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] AsinX:
we have no source code for ICS roms so how are you gonna compare them to super tweaked GB roms that we do have source for? Cant make performance changes without source code.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] nabbed:
Yeah, AOSP builds for ICZ are completely useless right now.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] locoboi187:
I think once we have source AOSP roms will be a bit smoother :)
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Ophois:
I don't understand what you're talking about...CM9 Alpha 2 here and everything is butter smooth.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] daneurysm:
This.

ICS leaks felt jerky as hell to me...especially because of the touch lag. CM9 is so much smoother ...YMMV of course.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] nabbed:
When you say "ICS leaks", what exactly do you mean, the browser, one of the launchers?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] The Root:
I hear odexing will help.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] bondosho:
I'm gonna go ahead and ***** too, since I'm not getting a 9000+ quadrant score.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Dr. Fed:
Of course you're entitled to your opinion, but in this case I would say they are not useless. In fact you've managed to find a use for them: comparing the performance of AOSP to TW roms for the E4GT. Important for appreciating the benefits of hardware acceleration. For those who enjoy the stock ICS look, these are fantastic roms to test out. I've never used an alpha that is as good as CM9-a2. Plus it lets me check out 4.0.4.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Gordon Ramsay:
This is interesting and I'm usually a stickler for smoothness when scrolling home screens but I have to say that using cm9 alpha 2 with nova prime has me satisfied. Also I find that touchwiz in the leaked ics builds is kinda chunky so maybe Sammy are having issues with fudging in their gpu UI stuff into ics.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] daneurysm:
The Samsung ics leaked roms, as a whole. The browser performance didn't stand out in either. The overall UI seems much smoother on cm9 than anyvof the 'official' leaks. Launcher? Any. I tried adwex, lpp, launxher7, nova. TW is no smoother than GB stock. Trebuchet on cm9 is fantastic. Nova and the rest are the same on both...except lpp. That just runs like crap on both, especially noticeable in the 3d drawer. Reminds me of how crappy it ran on my E3D.

The touch lag on the ics leaks makes it really hard to compare, honestly. For my money cm9 is the smoothest ics experience thus far.

As usual YMMV.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] wp7chris:
Sounds like this guy is aosp roms suck and feels like he's better than anyone else, don't talk smack just wait until customs roms get more updates.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] wp7chris:
Do you want the devs to quit?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] acme64:
and no one thinks this lag or choppyness has anything to do with the alpha state of the aosp? or the fact the very leaks themselves aren't final?

nobody?

bueller?

bueller?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] daneurysm:
I don't. I don't know what lag or choppyness anyone is talking about on AOSP/CM9...it's the smoothest my phone--any phone I've ever used--has ever run. ADWex is even a hair smoother than on the ICS leaks.

I do turn on "force 2D accell" under development options, though, I doubt it actually does anything.

I don't know if GPU accell is on or not. Honestly, even if stock GB TWlauncher is accelerated I'm not impressed....it's not much smoother than LPP or ADWex. But I do know that--to me, on my specific phone--CM9 with Trebuchet or ADWex is smooth and lag free. I leave the governor alone, I just change the scheduler to deadline. It seems to run not as fast as CFQ at times, but, it seems more consistent to me. Probably placebo.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] soupmagnet:
OK, let me first preface by saying that I have like zero development experience but I'm pretty smart and I'm trying to learn. You have to start somewhere, right?

So I decided to take a crack at it when I came across this thread:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=24278953

It's a Linux tutorial but having only a Mac, I decided to see if I could make it work. It didn't but the point is that, in the process, I learned a LOT.

So following a suggestion, I scrapped the whole Mac idea and started all over on an Ubuntu 11.4 VM. Which works great but it's a little less forgiving than the Mac.

Anyway, I have my build environment completely set up with all the necessary packages installed...no problem. I have the device specific proprietary files in place and pre-builts installed as well.

Now its time to build. I do so using this command:

source build/envsetup.sh
brunch otter -j$(gprep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo)

...runs for a couple minutes before stopping at this error:

In file included from frameworks/base/media/libmedia/IMediaPlayerService. cpp:25: frameworks/base/include/media/IOMX.h:29:17: error: jni.h: No such file or directory make: *** [out/target/product/otter/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libmedia_ intermediates/IMediaPlayerService.o] Error 1

So basically, the file "IOMX.h" makes a declaration to include "jni.h" which isn't anywhere in my /android tree.

Upon further research I learn that "jni.h" has something to do with Java. I have the required java-sun-jdk 6.1.x installed so I figured it must be a problem with my $PATH. I found the "jni.h" in question in the Java folder and did an export $PATH to that folder. Then I entered echo $PATH to make sure:

echo $PATH /home/linux/bin:/usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games:/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.26

Sure enough, the folder where "jni.h" is located is included in my path, but I'm still getting the same errors.

What am I doing wrong?
[Xoom General] sudermatt:
Just saw this on Droid-Life

http://www.droid-life.com/2012/04/0...xus-rom-near-you-that-would-be-app-shortcuts/

Custom Navigation buttons..sounds like a very nice idea.

Any ROMs currently implementing this or planning on it?
[Xoom General] Samwes:
nice

That is a very good idea, would look nicer if the links were in the same blue scheme of ics
[Xoom General] bigrushdog:
This is more of a theme concept than a development concept. Where's all the themers at?
[Xoom General] joshndroid:
Eerr big rush.... Couldn't this be implemented like aokp has rom control to manage the nav bar... Couldn't eos throw in a control where you can set a custom button n icon on the fly? We should be getting something similar it seems in b30 of aokp for maguro

http://rootzwiki.com/news/_/articles/new-nav-button-functions-previewed-for-aokp-build-30-r613
[Xoom General] bigrushdog:
Well... ugh... are you talking about just changing the pngs or adding additional buttons for apps?
[Xoom General] joshndroid:
Not just pngs but addition of custom shortcuts to other apps the addition of extra icons into the nav bar... On b30 I am now able to do all that and you can set what the long press does... Which is pretty cool I have to say
[Xoom General] bigrushdog:
Ahh gotcha. I saw the story and video on Engadget. Congrats to the AOKP team! Yes we have something similar in the works. Then implementation will be different but I'm pretty sure the result will exceed expectations.
[Xoom General] joshndroid:
i seriously cant wait... we have so much nav bar room on the xoom... it would lead to epicness... and a much more minimalistic layout for the home screens:cool:
[HTC Rezound] ijustwantmydock:
can somebody help me? i go into fastboot with my usb in my computer my phone says "fastboot usb" then i do a command and my computer says "< waiting for device >"

Edit:this is what I'm seeing
[HTC Rezound] AshtonTS:
Try rebooting your computer
[HTC Rezound] a.mcdear:
you can try "fastboot devices" to show which devices the computer can detect. If your phone is plugged in and at the hboot screen, you should see it registered.
[HTC Rezound] ijustwantmydock:
nope just goes back to c:\android
[HTC Rezound] nrfitchett4:
Reboot phone reboot computer and turn off any antiviruses. This always works for me. If not, might need to reinstall drivers.
[HTC Rezound] ijustwantmydock:
What drivers exactly?
[HTC Rezound] kryptik06:
Yes make sure u have the correct drivers installed
[HTC Rezound] MrSmith317:
You need the HTC drivers..try these:

http://mypcdominion.com/Files/android/ROM_Tools/HTCDriver3.0.0.007.exe
[HTC Rezound] ijustwantmydock:
Thanks ill try this when I get home
[HTC Rezound] Reaper0294:
Make sure you have usb debugging enabled. I didn't and I got the same error I believe you are. It should be under settings. On the new RUU its under develop options but not sure about older firmware
[HTC Rezound] ijustwantmydock:
Thank you that's probably my problem
[HTC Rezound] MrSmith317:
USB debugging isn't going to matter in HBOOT which is the only place that fastboot is useful.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] JoshsDesk:
Hi there Andrioderers..

Well I have a galaxy p6200 3g/wifi and i am trying to set up my internet calls to connect with my google voice using pbxes.org. While setting this up I found out that this will only work if I have cyanogenmod. But I cant't find a version of cyanogenmod for the gt p6200. What would be the best version for this??? and/or/is there a better way i should be doing this? HEEEELLLP.

Thanks a bunch :eek:
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] painter_:
You hit the nail on the head with the statement " But I cant't find a version of cyanogenmod for the gt p6200." because there is not one currently. A quick look i the development section would only yield a result for a developers preview. That preview is not stable nor fully functional.

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=24317571&postcount=1
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] k_t_b:
Hm... Are you sure you need CM for this?

I use Sipdroid+pbxes.org+Google Voice on my WIFI-only GT-P6210. It seems to work well enough.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] Sun_Cat:
If all you want to do is receive and place phone calls on your Tab using your Google Voice account, and you don't want any of the extra features of pbxes.org, then all you need is the GrooVe IP app.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] jhorner:
I use Groove IP with little to no problems, can even use my bluetooth headset most of the time. Usually if I have issues, a reboot or redial solves it.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] orb360:
I use

CSipSimple + SipSourcery + IPKall + Google Voice for calls.

Works great.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] WhateverGetsTheJobDone:
It's brand new (minus the cellophane wrap) and I can't get anyone to buy it locally on CL. Rare as hen's teeth. I'm surprised there has been no interest.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] chamberc:
??? They're easy to find anywhere.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] pileot:
my area you can get one from damn near anywhere, its the tablet thats hard as hell to get
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] sitnlow4life:
what color?

im interested
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Fmstrat:
Yea, where are you, what color, and how much are you asking?
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] neo1738:
can someone explain why Amazon is now selling these for $179.99 while BB still has them at $149.99?
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Fmstrat:
Those are Amazon sellers, Amazon.com is out.

Ben
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] mario_1603:
i bought a new dock today for $119 + $6 shipping on amazon
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] sitnlow4life:
link ?

I need one
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] fasthair:
Office Depot

I picked up a dock a couple of days ago at my local Office Depot. They had it in stock at list price. Of course they didn't have any of the TF201 tablets in stock but plenty of the TF101s.

I'm still not sure I'm going to keep it though. I didn't buy my Prime to use as a laptop really. I bought it to use as a tablet, I've got plenty of netbooks, laptops and desktops. What really disappointed me was they don't come with a charger and cable.

I've docked mine once and didn't even remove the plastic protective covering just to see what it is all about. I can see how people are cracking screens with this thing though. The hinge is unbelievably tight.

If I do decide to sell it I will post.

fasthair
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] neo1738:
almost wonder if storing tab and dock separately for things like travel and transport would be a better (safer) idea.