yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Laazyboy:
When I went to bed it was at 90 percent, woke up 7 and a half hours later, down to 48 percent! It does go in to deep sleep however
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] eugene373:
I never said it was :rolleyes: I said I can't reproduce the Problem & stated what hardware I've tried with.... nothing more.

as the guy said he's having issues on a Linksys & Netgear.

Kernel issues are being looked at today & and hoping an update is ready tonight.

on a 7+ hrs sleep last night I got the drain down to 24% > fresh flash > battery @ 84% > wake time 7hrs later > 60%

so we went from 5% down to roughly 3.5% percent while in sleep mode..

This was just rom edits & no kernel edits as of yet, so hope looks good :D
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Christ1119:
Not to steer the thread in a different direction but for anyone that didn't notice that's not Eugene's CM7, that's an ICS ROM
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Docmjldds:
I posted to you instead of the user with the issue. I left it figuring it would be understood I was only referencing Netgear as a general reply to you or the user since I use Netgear...is all. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] eugene373:
oh okay!

I clearly didn't understand then, yeah It's an odd bud & I've done everything I can to produce it for myself, no luck as of yet but I'm aware of the issue for some.

Thanks for point out what you meant :D
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] superuser696:
sorry posted wrong thread
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] eugene373:
Update ETA

ETA is on for Tonight! Battery issue's found!

R2 issue fixed for upcoming release..

LED Flash Mode: No Longer grayed out

Lockring: All issue's Resolved

Video player FC = Fixed

USB Mount = 100%

CM7 SD: CM7 displays SD's Correctly.... emmc reports the internal & sdcard reports external via settings

Battery: All issue's resolved

WiFi: Should be Fully resolved for those that had connection issues
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jahrule:
Now with so many bugs fixed and such. Can we update the OP to a know buglist rather than just saying:

"**Bug list:**

the rest of the bugs from CM7 are still there"

That google doc was cool that you had before. I think that if the OP has a list of known bugs then people will not post bugs/questions that should be known.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] masamichi7:
Eugene is still smokin'! Haha

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jaxenroth:
Can't wait.

Sent from my phone.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] kojot1234:
You know how to make us smile! Will provide feedback. Thank you.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] dave2metz:
Im glad there is going to be an update tonight. I have been wanting to check out this ROM for a while, but I read a lot of postings that were not so good. Now that a lot of bugs are worked out, I will flash it. What are your thoughts on the current version?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jangst123:
Just a friendly reminder!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jahrule:
If you see my post, a few above this one, i am trying to get OP to show current buglist
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] MT4GH:
So trying to figure out how to turn off the softkeys light I looked didn't find in setting but wen I go into home screen and use the power control widget I hit the aouto brightness and shuts offs the lighting on the softkeys but it only does it sometimes woundering if there's another way to shut them off?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] darkamikaze:
You can try Settings>CMsettings>Display>AutoBrightness and set the buttons to be 0 instead of 255 for the lower levels.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] starskyrob:
Is there sourcecode available, Eugene? I'd love to take a crack at some of these bugs
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jordanishere:
probably his github? i know the original source was from slayher and is avail at his git.

Sent from my SGH-T989
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] eugene373:
Source for what?

slayher never posted his source & I've been fixing everything in smali.. so no I don't have any source.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jordanishere:
^ youve made all these changes with no source? for some reason i thought it was avail.

**** thats impressive

Sent from my SGH-T989
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] itzsmokey:
Said like a boss
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] starskyrob:
That came off a little angry dude lol. Just thought u might be able to use a hand. Good luck though!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jahrule:
I would be pretty pist too if. I was doing Somali edits this whole time. That is jank that we don't have source because that means once this starts running awesomely then we can't compile miui or anything based off of it :(
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] starskyrob:
Lol Somali edits. I can't stop laughing.oh auto correct
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jahrule:
Yea auto correct is a B sometimes like every time I type mms I get moms
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] IRIE4IPIER:
Smh
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] eugene373:
Angry?

Wasn't supposed to be how it came out nor typed.. I just don't have the source everyone is looking for.

Sorry,

~Eugene
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] bigtom624:
Didn't seem like you came off angry to me.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Buck Shot:
Best CM7 I've came across yet. Ill be sticking around. I missed this too much. Thanks for the work

Ruling the word on my Galaxy S2
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jordanishere:
all good bro. wasnt bothered in the least.

thanks for all your work on this rom.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] evanladoux:
Eugene, thanks for your excellence in. your T989 work. Is there any possibility of WiFi Calling working in this next update?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] eugene373:
posting update when my wife gets home...

I'll try and make clear of the bug list since it seems people (or some) haven't used CM7 before...

after which I need to move onto other projects I've been putting off for far to long.

~Eugene
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jahrule:
Does this mean this will be the last update we see for a long time?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Sammydr10:
Pretty much lol
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jahrule:
I hope for our sake your wrong. Or maybe his other projects = aosp ics :D
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] :
Kernal

is this ROM compatible with MrX's CM kernal?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] }{Alienz}{:
His other projects are on other phones. Pretty sure.

Hopefully the update with an awesome kernel good on battery is released tonight though.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] monkeypaws:
I believe he also stated a while ago that when he got done with cm. He would work on ics.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jordanishere:
thats really good news actually.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] evanladoux:
Ideally, a CM9 T989 ROM WITH WiFi Calling working :eek:
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] bbobarino:
Can't wait for the update :-) :-) :-) :-) and yes cm9 with WiFi calling is a dream I have also
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] eugene373:
Update is now Posted.. Enjoy!

~Eugene
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jeanmauri90:
Is there any app that hides my usage from att? Even though iam not tethering i would like to hide my usage they send me a letter saying iam one of top 5% that uses data heavily and that they would lower my speeds if i keep using my "unlimited" plan

So stupid ill sue them if they do
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] sbddude:
not possible. plus that's fraud.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jeanmauri90:
Ik its fraud but wouldnt be fraud from them to lower my speeeds cause i sign a contract for unlimited meaning all i want to use if they drop it to E is like not having internet is useless..... And thank you anyways
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] canecbr600:
Its data on there network, how do u propose to hide it? Also u are unlimited, just throttled. They arnt limiting the amount of data. Common Sense?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] StaticMatt:
Want to hide your data usage from AT&T? Use wifi.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jeanmauri90:
There is a way to hide the data u tether thats why i wondered if there was an app for hiding the actual amount that we use....... I guess not thank u all for ur time and explanations
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] johnus:
You can't hide ANY data while using their network. All you can do is hide the fact that you ARE tethering, not that you're using extra data all of a sudden.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] camaroz28:
Just to play devils advocate here:

By throttling they technically are limiting the amount of data. If you can only download at .3Mbps that means you are only able to download ~97GB in a 30 day period. Say you get throttled for the last week of your billing cycle that means you can only download 22GB that week. This is opposed to the ~260GB you could download on HSPA, the ~590GB you could download in a week at HSPA+ speeds, and the ~2.2TB you could download in a week at LTE speeds.

Yes this does prove there is no such thing as an unlimited plan, but it does prove that they are limiting the amount of data you can download in a given period of time.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] johnus:
That's a good point. I'm sure that would work if someone wanted to take AT&T to small claims court. But then again as long as I've had "unlimited" through them, there was always a 5GB cap that was spelled out in the fine print of my contract. The only exception to that was for iPhone users. That's the only reason I switched to an iPhone a couple years back.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] shansmi:
What contract? There is no contract for data, only for voice. There are Terms of Service but no contract.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] sodomanaz:
Take them to small claims court. They've already lost once before recently for throttling. http://consumerist.com/2012/03/att-writes-check-to-victor-in-small-claims-court-suit.html
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jeanmauri90:
I just exceeded the 5G limit and they lowered my speeds down to 0.60mbps or lower at some points.... they said my speedz will be back when my next billing cycle starts
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] sdc177:
Switch to Sprint.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] tri0xinn:
down to .60 mbps? thats not bad.. I'm on Sprint and 3g usually averages .50 mbps..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] welchertc:
That's because sprint and Verizon's 3g blows. 3g on ATT is faster than Wimax 4g for sprint in most areas.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Theoriginalgiga:
that really sucks that they're limiting you, I assume you're in a busy area and that's going to be expected. Like one of the other posters suggested, try using WiFi. If I recall you can cruise to any place that has AT&T wifi and get it free (like starbucks and McDonalds and sams club) and do your major downloading there. I know that isn't on the go, but if you want a coffee, it isn't the worst suggestion.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] cricketdaniel:
I have had the same question for awhile now. I am using Simple mobile 4G unlimited data (so they so boldly advertize until they shut you down). I really wanted to take advantage of the "Mobile on the go". In my vehicle I have Bluetooth that would allow me to stream music on the go (On my long commute through Houston everyday), or use Netflix on that long tripe with the family & tether to my Tablet to take care of business, stream, movies. You get the point.

As for down loading, I am not sure why you would want to do any major downloading through a phone anyway. Using your home network is much better for major downloading.:confused:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jamesc760:
This is my experience with ATT Unlimited Data Plan:

I got grandfathered into the unlimited data plan through my old iphone original, if my memory serves me correct. I don't use data heavily like some of you do and I tether infrequently. Last summer, we were at a community swimming pool where we live and I let my daughter to tether to my Samsung android phone. My daughter at the time had an iphone 3gs. About two weeks later, I got a nasty message from att telling me that they noticed that I was tethering and that they will put me on an appropriate data plan if I don't call them back. So, I called and played dumb and they told me that if I ever tether again, they will go ahead and terminate my unlimited data plan.

I received a Samsung Note 10.1 (model #8013) for christmas, and guess what? I have tethered the tablet to my android phone, thinking they won't notice the android traffic coming from an android phone. I have been careful, not downloading tablet-specific apps from the play store and such. Also, I only tether when there's no wifi, it's the last resort. It's been over a month and I haven't heard from them. I am sure ATT is chomping at the bits to get me so they can get rid of one more unlimited data user.

Am I committing a fraud? Maybe. I'd like to think I am engaging in a civil disobedience against an unjust power.

Isn't AT&T also committing a fraud, when they are advertisizing "unlimited" when in fact there's a limit?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rangercaptain:
The amount of data is unlimited. And they do warn you if you go above a certain amount they will throttle you down. And they let you know the plan is for one phone only and offer you a tethering add-on. They offer thousands of free hotspots for heavy downloaders and give you an app to find them.

Its their superhighway - you just pay the tolls and follow the rules. You don't like them, but it's not fraud on their part.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] VitaZora:
This is what makes me crazy about Google and Android (and yes, companies like Samsung) - the uneven distribution of updates (I know, I know). In this case, some devices are already receiving 4.0.4 while many of us are still stuck waiting for the (empty?) promises to update to 4.0.

Just sayin'.

http://androidcommunity.com/android-4-0-4-ics-rolling-out-for-nexus-s-xoom-and-galaxy-nexus-20120328/
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] amtrakcn:
Google just develop the OS itself. Whether the device run the system depends on hardware vendor.

The current situation is like MS just released Windows 7 but your PC(part) manufacturer has not released new driver yet.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] Zadeis:
That is a good way to look at it and completely agree with it. The laptop I have hasn't seen a graphics driver update in 6 months now. Something that should be kept up to date on a monthly basis :mad:

If it really comes down to it hopefully Samsung will get their act together and release the full source code for our Tablet. Than at that point we can take matters into our own hands.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] [David]:
C'mon guys. The 4.0.3 had lots of bugs. I updated it on my GF'S Nexus S when just been released and battery was drained in few hours. Devs from all devices (for example Xoom - which I have) had to work out to fix issues that have been fixed by Google after months in 4.0.4

So I'm not so disappointed for having not received the 4.0.3 (even 'cuz we have too few devs). I trust in Samsung and believe there will be avaible on April :) Let's wait

N.b.

I have a Galaxy Note and the only ROMS for ICS avaibles are leaked from the Chinese version of my device. ICS has not been released yet (and we're talking about NOTE...)

Sent from my Galaxy Note with DarkyROM 3.3
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] gingerboy92:
i don't really care what bs version samsung is going to release for tab plus's ICS.

the only thing i care is the source code! the faster they release the source code, the faster someone could work on CM9 for tab7plus. THAT is what matter! :D :mad:
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] h2g2:
ICS source from Samsung has no real effect on CM9. CyanogenMod is an AOSP ROM which means that it's not built from Samsung's sources, it's built straight from Google's upstream sources. That's how devices like the HP TouchPad, Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet have CM9 builds now - none of these devices ever had ICS sources released.

Right now, the only thing that's really holding back CM9 development on the tab7plus is a lack of tab7plus owners contributing to a CM9 port.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] chrisrotolo:
yeah Im waiting for CM9, gave up on Samsung. If they release it great. Id rather CM9 anyday, even with no wifi!!
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] gingerboy92:
not the kernel source, and don't forget the wireless chip/adapter/card(?)'s source code.

but yeah, i do agree. we need more devs to work on our tab! :p
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] Ceelos09:
We're still lacking driver source (i.e. our Atheros wifi driver) so even if we got someone to port CM9 to our tabs, we'd have no wifi functionality. The only way to get drivers (with no proper source code released for them) is to reverse engineer the driver(s) themselves, which is a difficult task to say the least.

The reason why most of us say we're waiting for our tabs "ICS Source" is because we're hoping Samsung actually releases our wifi Driver Source code this time.

But...if I remember correctly...someone had pointed out that although Samsung had not released proper source code for our wifi driver, another Sony device that uses it had released code that we could "possibly" use. No one has really confirmed nor denied anything past that recently. Maybe Gary can comment on this issue soon, could clear up a lot of questions for me and everyone else
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] gingerboy92:
the real problem here is that samsung is "promising" ICS "soon". it would be easier if they say they are going to release it next year or even not going to release it at all.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] h2g2:
Kernel source doesn't mean driver sources. Remember that drivers don't need to be integrated into the kernel - if Samsung (or the manufacturer of the device) chooses to implement the driver as a binary-only lkm, there's no obligation on Samsung's part to release the source code for the driver.

This has been a problem with Linux drivers in general for a while. I could be wrong, but my sense is that if the needed driver isn't already available in source code from the manufacturer directly, it's unlikely that Samsung will include it in their kernel sources.

---------- Post added at 10:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:20 PM ----------

My guess is that if Samsung has not released the needed sources previously, they probably won't do so with ICS. This is just pure speculation on my part, it's possible Samsung's failure to release wifi driver source was an oversight on Samsung's part but if that were the case, it seems like they would have fixed that already.

I don't know what chip the GT7P uses but some Googling suggests that it's an Atheros 6000 series. If that's the case, the Linux driver source is available: http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/ar6k

ar6k isn't part of the mainline Linux kernel so there's no obligation on Samsung's part to release it as part of their kernel source release. Whether Samsung is obligated to release their ar6k driver source is probably dependent on their agreement with Atheros (ie, just because an open source Linux ar6k exists doesn't preclude the possibility that Samsung licensed a non-GPL version of the driver).
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] bittersound:
What is the best way for us Tab 7.0+ owners to contribute?
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] gingerboy92:
thanks for the clarification.:)
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] h2g2:
In a general sense, there is no answer as it depends on what the problem is. If there are willing developers who don't have access to hardware, you can always donate hardware or chip in to help with that. If there aren't enough willing developers, well, you just have to learn to code or chip in for a bounty to get a developer interested. If, on the other hand, it's a lack of vital documentation or source code from Samsung, well, there's not much you can do except perhaps get some sort of letter writing or phone call campaign over to the appropriate corporate offices.

In a specific sense, best bet is to go over to the development sub-forum, find someone with a project you'd like to support and ask them what help they need.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] Ceelos09:
Gary once mentioned he would help with porting CM9, but he did make it clear to us that it would be a while until he would jump in to help. Life must be keeping him busy atm.

For now, I'm working on learning some code, maybe I'll be of "some" help down the road.
[Acer Iconia Tab A100] NoSudo:
Would you like to watch hulu in your browser on your tablet like you do on your PC? This script is written modify adobe flash to allow you to do exactly that.

Heads up! I have just released version 2.05 of Flashex (formerly hulumod)

Some of the new features include

-Added the ability the verify the version number for Busybox(v1.19.4-cm9)

-Added a feature to verify Busybox location, permissions, version and inform user of incompatibilities and make appropriate suggestions to enable compatability if possible.

-Automatic re-edit of edited source file, when either an upgrade or downgrade is detected. This allows the script to be run at boot via Script Manager, or other while still leaving, Adobe Flash to auto update.

-Script is now a single executable file that will both hex edit Adobe Flash(each update), and copy the edited file over to /data when needed.

-Improved version detection

-Improved output messages

The info and download can be found HERE

I'm cross linking it here to allow feedback posts. If you have questions about the app or would like help getting it to work on another device, flash version etc. You may post here and/or PM me. I'm happy to try an expand support provided I have the time.

ALSO Please remember to hit that Thanks button if you find my script useful.
[Acer Iconia Tab A100] Mark12343:
I am trying to get this to work with init.d but it gives some kind of error when I try to run it from that folder something about no sh is there a command I can use to just copy the file over via init.d instead of running the entire script as that will likely also increase boot time?

Also this works on a nexus 4 running 4.4.2 just need to get the right version of flashplayer

OK I can run it from the init.d folder after android starts but its not running automatically I'm on CyanogenMod if that matters I have set file permissions to 755 all I have it doing is deleting the original and copying the edited after am I missing something here?

#!/system/bin/sh

rm /data/data/com.adobe.flashplayer/lib/libflashplayer.so

cp /storage/emulated/0/Flashex2/libflashplayer.so /data/data/com.adobe.flashplayer/lib/
[Acer Iconia Tab A100] rasen1:
Hey - which version of flashplayer did you get this to work with 4.4.2?

Thanks
[Acer Iconia Tab A100] Mark12343:
http://xdaforums.com/nexus-4/general/flash-player-4-4-kitkat-instructions-t2548037
[Acer Iconia Tab A100] DoubleL03:
Dont need this, download puffin browser in the play store
[Verizon Droid Incredible 2] ChrisDDD:
Roughly 1/3 of the threads here end up getting locked. I've looked through numerous other forums, and this seems to be the only one where this happens. Just curious why.

At first, I thought it was questions being posted to the general forum, but most of the posts here are questions in one form or another, yet only some are locked, often before even a single reply.

Anyone else feel the moderation might be a tad heavy handed?

IBTL... ;)
[Verizon Droid Incredible 2] knipp21:
The ones I've noticed are old threads/or where the person didn't search (3 threads right next to each other asking about a GSM lock code...this has been answered numerous rimes..ans now there is also a discussion thread with the answer) I had no problem with the ones I started being locked
[Verizon Droid Incredible 2] yurilebbie:
Can't wait for this thread to get locked :p