yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[G2 and Desire Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hoffmas:
how did you root? if you used the wiki method you should already have cwm-recovery...

push power & volume - to enter bootloader and then choose the recovery option

if this doesn´t work, post your hboot number... you have s-off? (reason: if you flashed the eng hboot while rooting you can flash the cwm-recovery through fastboot)

command: "fastboot flash recovery recovery.img"
[G2 and Desire Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] blackknightavalon:
Go into Terminal Emulator and type "su." If it asks you if you want it to have root permissions, you have root.

Posted from Spaceball One
[G2 and Desire Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] darkness280:
I rooted following the wiki.

I'm trying to install roms through rom manager and when I hit download roms it says, "You must have ClockworkMod Recovery installed before continuing! Install the recovery through ROM Manager First"

Sorry, all of this still confuses me, this is my first time doing this. I don't know what Terminal Emulator is.
[G2 and Desire Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hoffmas:
ok, i will try to help...

1. download a rom of your choice to pc

2. put it on your sdcard

3. enter recovery (turn the phone off, then press power & volume down - the bootloader will appear, choose the option recovery (volume up and down for moving and tp-wake to choose)

4. in recovery first wipe data & cache & dalvik cache

5. again in recovery choose install from sdcard and select your downloaded rom

6. reboot and have fun...

pls hit the thanks button
[G2 and Desire Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KyraOfFire:
The ROM manager and ClockwordMod you have after rooting following the wiki is a VERY old version. It will say you do not have Clockword even if you do have it.

Things to try:

1. Install ROM manager from the market.

2. Reboot into recovery (turn off the phone, then hold down volume and power until you see the HBOOT, choose recovery). If you're in ClockwordMod (which you should) then you're fine.

3. Flash a new recovery through ADB (which what you should definitely learn how to do)

3a. download the newest version of ClockwordMod, copy the img file to the same folder as adb

http://www.clockworkmod.com/rommanager

3b. go to settings, make sure that you're in USB Debugging Mode

3c. now, just to make sure you won't brick your phone, turn off the phone, hold down volume and power. If you see the FASTBOOT USB, you're good to go.

3d. open cmd in your computer

3e. type in "fastboot flash recovery recovery.img"

in which recovery.img is the recovery image you just downloaded. If you download it from the website I pointed, the command will be

fastboot flash recovery recovery-clockwork-5.0.2.7-vision.img

Now you have the latest recovery. Go to recovery in the HBOOT menu to see the result, enjoy!

Terminal emulator: It will be one of the apps in your apps drawer, named "Terminal Emulator". May or may not be there depends on what ROM you're running.

Check for root using cmd: using command "adb shell", you should see

adb server us out of date, killing...

*daemon started successfully*

root@android:/#

Installing ROM: please try not to use ROM Manager, learn how to do it in Recovery at least. Because if you cannot boot to your ROM, runs ROM manager then you're stuck when something wrong happens (which is quite usual if you're flashing). Best way is to copy the ROM to your SD card, reboot to recovery, choose "Install from zip" then pick the zip file of the ROM. (remember to wipe data/cache and dalvik cache in the advanced menu)

Hope that helps!

Edited: http://www.clockworkmod.com/rommanager is down for the moment. I attached the newest G2 recovery img for you. Use either of them. Touch is more advance (and more confusing).
[G2 and Desire Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] crestofawave:
Disregard. Kyra was faster.

Sent from my DZ.
[Android Themes] pele78:
:eek:

10 char
[Android Themes] WildeRNS:
where to find this file?
[Android Themes] LKNim:
Compile from source:(
[Android Themes] WildeRNS:
oooo.... maybe someone already done this mod for cm9?
[Android Themes] SpaceCaker:
Awesome gonna give it a try on mdpi

herpderp © aint got money to pay to my fish
[Android Themes] SpaceCaker:
can u help me ?

i cant find frameworks_base/core/java/com/android/internal/widget/multiwaveview/MultiWaveView.java

even on the source of it galaxyics.com '

i couldnt find

i really want too apply this

could i request u to make it for this

dl link of framework http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?x812a9j12fxo8cg

(CM9)

i hope u can help :P

just 1 little request
[Android Themes] y2karthik:
try and report back,also mention the device and os
[Android Themes] SpaceCaker:
figured out that my pc is damm bad at compiling from source -_-

160 GB 1 gb ram

:(
[Android Themes] flyrocket:
Ooo, going to try this, hope I don't screw something up :o
[Android Themes] Articudos:
Just flashed, it's awesome. but... to Unlock, Only one point is able to touch:-(
[Android Themes] jun980219:
thanks for sharing :)

Can i use this mod to my CUSTOM ROM?
[Android Themes] evilisto:
sure.. no problem if you use my work with proper credit given..:)
[Android Themes] Thatgrass:
Ok, I handled to edit all the files, by the first one: that .java thing; i just copied everything in a notepad++ screen and saved it as .java, but I don't know where I have to put that file.

So question 1: Where do i have to put the MultiWaveView.java file?

And I hahve opened the framework-res.apk with apktool, but apktool gives an error when I type: apktool b out

(out=direction where I have the unpacked framework-res.apk)

So question 2: how to put the arrays.xml, ic_lockscreen_outerring.xml and keyguard_screen_tab_unlock.xml in the framework-res.apk?

Thanks in advanced
[Android Themes] sidewalk_:
Wow, too complicated for me :eek:
[Android Themes] Thatgrass:
:p i know, i had Same thing when I saw it for the first tome
[Android Themes] x-dira:
plzz post guide edit framework.jar

i dont know use source

thanks
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Totòòò:
"You are smart folks, we're sure we don't have to hand you a note to figure it out... no sky rocket scientists needed ;) (/bad puns)"

http://pocketnow.com/android/att-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-now-receiving-cyanogenmod-9-nightlies
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Eric-1987:
Sounds good but hOw is that proof?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Totòòò:
the quoted sentence is directly from cyanogenmod google+ status. if you read between the lines you will understand their "note" regards our note and the "sky rocket" regards the skyrocket lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] s1mpd1ddy:
Excited

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ierv69:
Great news!!!:D:D:D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] mark1s:
In the last week, the internationnal version if the note received a rom from Codenaster, a ported version of AOKP and of MIUI all running on ICS. Well probably see the same roms for us once we get a ics leak. This is awesome!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ciwrl:
Glad you guys appreciated my not-so-subtle hints. We are working hard on the T989 and 727 (hercules and celox) and will begin work on the Note as soon as the i777 progresses to a more solid state.

-ciwrl
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Eric-1987:
CM9 would be my dream no way thats happening!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ahmarchi:
Heeeeelllllllll yeeeeeezzzz
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Totòòò:
Yup great news! and got no sources but this time I have the feeling the us note will get the ics update before the int'l note. was reading some articles about gsII how europe updates are late(they usually get it first) so might be some chance our note gets the update before the int'l version :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] phxblue:
YES! YES! YES!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Maroon Mushroom:
Well this made my day.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Sinful Animosity:
Euro has ICS, but they're not very nice roms
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Totòòò:
only hungary and scandinavian countries do. uk is still struggling while att skyrocket already got it i think?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Lakeshow423:
Great News!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Sinful Animosity:
Skyrocket is just a leak I believe? I'm not sure if it's fully functional or not. But what would really be the foot in everyone's mouth is if the note gets a fully functional ics before the international
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Eric-1987:
Man I wish I could put on CM9 already!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] kikex76:
I've been playing with CM9 on my SGS2 which just came out yesterday and it is super kickass. Just few minor details that need to be worked out, like no video recording. Hopefully, by the time it comes out for our Note, everything should be OK.;) I don't see face unlock in it. I wonder if it would be included later on. I played with the ICS att leak, and don't see much of a difference other than face unlock. I'll stay on Saurom Rom until DAGr8 releases an ICS version of it. Way better.;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Carnifex3:
How do we know they are not talking about hooking up the International note and not ours?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Coffinfeeder:
If they're talking about the skyrocket, which is an ATT phone.. they're not talking about the international Note. Also, the ATT Note and skyrocket have the same internals.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] zer0nine:
Well if you read the post, you will see that the i777 was previously labeled as "galaxys2att" on the Cyanogen website.

CyanogenMod wants clean and straight forward labeling of devices on their page, so they switched to the model number of the phone ("galaxys2att" -> i777). The kicker here is that the AT&T Note (i717) and Skyrocket (i727) have similar model numbers; therefore, the hint would be that CM9 should be coming to the Note and Skyrocket soon. :p
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Snarksneeze:
Bah, enough about 4.0, where's my 5.0 ROMs? ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Eric-1987:
They didnt tell you CM10 is coming soon?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Maroon Mushroom:
This is actually such good news that I'm tempted to get a second battery just because I know I'll use it more
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Sheolrock:
As a skyrocket user running the ICS leak I can confirm that it is very smooth, polished, and stable. There are a couple minor bugs but I think it should be more than enough to give the CM team what they need for our shared chip set.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] lowspeed:
Nice !

!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] cgibsong002:
What's so good about CM9? When googling to find out exactly what it was, there was so many hits on it that I couldn't actually find anything describing it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] lowspeed:
Lean, very fast and with nice little tweaks that make life easier.

do a youtube search for a demo.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Maroon Mushroom:
Pretty much what the Galaxy Nexus is running (AOSP Ice Cream Sandwich) + a bunch of tweaks and added features.

It's probably the best kind of rom out there in my opinion
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] littlewierdo:
Basically, Cyanogen aims to give you the core Google experience with as many options to tweak as possible.

In essence, if your phone supports it, they try to enable support for it.

If they ever decide to get their Nightlies back up and working again, they have updates nearly every day, the only question you have to ask yourself (daily) is whether you want to update or not.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW_qGW-ylvo

Personally, Id like CM7 on the Note but I guess thats just me...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] bbgt2:
Huh? You are late! Codeworkx had CM9 kanged to the SGS2 months ago. Was using it and even in alpha it was amazing.

sent from the phablet aka the Note
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Snarksneeze:
I feel the same. Gingerbread was THE build to have just a few months back, now everyone is hyping ICS. From what I remember, GB was all about the fixes, like getting Bluetooth working right and also getting Honeycomb onto smaller screens. I have played with ICS on my HD2. It was pretty but not really worth the hype as far as I can tell.

I will just be satisfied when we get CM7 going. After that, I will worry about CM9. Certainly not interested in stock ICS from AT&T.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Toaster Strudels:
Why can't we get CM7 going right now? Don't we have everything that is necessary?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] littlewierdo:
I dont know if the CM team feels it is worth the trouble.

To me, I think GB is where Android was at, it just didnt visually look stunning.

ICS on the other hand took a step backwards with regards to functionality but looks prettier. I suspect Google will make it right with whatever they coin the next version of Android (many have claimed 'Jellybean').

Yes, ICS brings some improvements for memory management and other background processes but I dont care for the improvements (for one thing, it is far too strict on when to 'dump' an app out of ram, for another, the ICS footprint is significantly bigger than GB). The majority of improvements brought to up front functionality just are not something I would use (face unlocking, nfc, etc.).

For me, functionality beats beauty nearly every time and Android is not an exception.

The biggest thing that troubles me is that the CM team seems to have no interest in Nightlies for CM7 which, quite frankly, is the main thing that makes CM so neat to end users.

The end results of what Cyanogen produces is awesome, I just wish that they would work a bit on the development process itself, it certainly isnt as easy as it once was to get it on a device. They also seem to have no guidelines on what they coin alpha vs beta, vs RC's, vs Stable vs Nightlies.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ahmarchi:
Stupid to waste a lot.of.time porting cm7 with gb when xm 9 with ics is around the corner...uae this as an analogy.... Would u buy a galaxy note if u knew the note 2 was a month or so away???
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] skyhigh2004:
Have you actually used ICS? Idk how any one could go back to GB. Its so much less intuitive with the controls and layouts of apps and menus. GB IMHO was awesome and smooth but after screens got bigger than 3.7" looked terrible. Everything ties together so much better on ICS. The camera app in ICS aosp alone is worth getting a device with it.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] littlewierdo:
Yea, this always comes up every time I mention my preference of GB over ICS and I forget to put in the usual disclaimer.

I have four Captivates, one running ICS (CM9 to be specific) and I have the Samsung Nexus, currently not on a cell plan and it is running ICS unrooted stock.

The apps and menus are nearly identical to GB, the only significant difference is that app developers are now writing their apps to not require a menu button. And for those not aware, apps that are listed by the app developer as supported for ICS will look and behave differently than their GB counterpart.

'Intuitive' is all in the eye of the beholder. Sure, there were improvements made but it lost functionality and alot of it.

To be blunt, Android isnt intuitive. It never has been and ICS is certainly not remotely close to being intuitive (this my friends is where Apple has a leg up - you loose alot of functionality on Ios devices but they are certainly simple to use and configure).

And no, Im not an Apple fanboy, all of my cell phones are Android (8 currently). I DO however have an ipad (2nd gen), 3 Android tablets and a first gen iphone that I havent powered up in several years and my opinion is that Apple has it won hands down for tablets (battery life is WAY better than any Android tablet and 3rd party apps mostly due to the fact that Apple allows apps bigger than 50 MB - something Google I believe very recently changed), Android has the cell phone market hands down.

Alot of this stems for me from the fact that my cell phone goes with me everywhere I go. It needs to perform alot of different tasks, some of which ICS simply doesnt offer that GB does (I often need to have alot of different apps open at once and ICS is terrible for this as it tends to shut things down much more aggressively than GB). And there are just ALOT more settings in GB than ICS to make my phone behave exactly how I want it to down to the smallest thing.

There is one major distinction I have to make however, my comparisons are being made between stock Android GB/ICS and stock CM 7/9, NOT the bull**** excuses for an OS that the carriers put out, so please dont use a stock GB / ICS comparison from Motorola, Samsung, HTC or any other carrier as an example to disprove anything I am mentioning.

With regards to camera functionality, get an app. There are a **** ton on the market, one of them has to be good. Personally, I cant speak from experience here as I use a Cannon Mark 3 (and a Nikon something or other that I rarely use) camera for video and a Samsung EX1 for still pictures. These are cell phones and I just never wanted to use the camera on my cell phone - if I did, I would be carrying around an Iphone 4s - the new Iphone has a fantastic camera (for a cell phone). Dont get me wrong, Ive used it in a pinch when I dont have a camera around but the number of times could be counted on less than 2 hands for me personally.

http://whatareandroidphones.net/camera-ics-camera-app-on-android-2-2-froyo-2-3-gingerbread.html

OR, search the market for Camera ICS.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.moblynx.cameraicsplus
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Coffinfeeder:
The note takes great pictures. Maybe not to your polished photographer's taste, but for the average person it does a fine job.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ryandelman:
You and I might be two of ~3 or so people on this forum who are in total agreement on this topic.

-Ryan

---------- Post added at 09:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:22 AM ----------

Not only do I whole-heartedly disagree with you while being in total agreement with the post you quote, I also think that this is a TOTALLY subjective topic.

If you like chocolate ice cream better than vanilla, good deal. If I prefer vanilla, then good for me, and no matter what our reasons are behind these preferences, its not your place or mine to call each other's judgment into question.

You prefer ICS, I personally don't think it's what it was cracked up to be, certainly not worth all the praise some give it. I respect your vantage point but choose to disagree and that's it; no harm no foul.

-Ryan
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Coffinfeeder:
Let's be honest. Everyone here wants ICS because it's the newest version of android and this is a new device which should have the newest version on it.

I'm pretty pleased right now running saurom + transfusion on my Note, but I'm sure I'll flash an ICS rom when they become available.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] lowspeed:
I just want it because it would have better support for the dual core cpus.

Supposedly it does better on battery too.

Plus it's themed black so AMOLED will benefit.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Killemalll:
nvm

10 char
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] gotshoaib:
One in all advice for you,

Take some simple nokia or blackbery curve phone and be happy with your laptop.

And if you feel like Being smart enjoy ur ipad2 bcoz it seems you have no idea about Android's benefits over limited ios.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] lowspeed:
Agree, I actually find the iphone to be non intuitive. It all comes down to what you get used to.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] mark1s:
I heard that there's a secret notification led on the Galaxy Note that gonna be activated with ICS, omg I can't wait.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] lowspeed:
Ah ? We would be able to see it on the front?

Where did you hear this?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] InGeNeTiCs:
Yep. Right next to the secret fingerprint/retina scanner combo.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] lowspeed:
lol.

^
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ahmarchi:
Lol no comment
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Maroon Mushroom:
This would also be amazing with a tablet UI mod. As long as the phone / messaging features still work fine.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] skyhigh2004:
[

I guess we seem to be using different OS's because most of what you described isn't true about GB or ICS at least on my aosp devices. To each there own but I know running a nexus s on GB aosp is way worse on battery and not nearly as smooth as ICS aosp. I know I've ran them both. I shouldn't need to download a camera app just to edit pictures, what a waste of time and app space. I also love aosp devices and don't need my phone to have 100+ apps. I've never had any phone shut down my apps because I had to many open. If your doing that kind of major multi tasking maybe a net book is in order? I'm not trying to argue with you just showing you a different point of view, which is shared by a lot of ICS users.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] skyhigh2004:
While again I appreciate your opinions you just went on about nothing pertinent to my post besides telling me if I download an app it will do what my camera app already should have out of the box. I mentioned the net book for the memory management reasons not battery. With 1gb of ram, idk how many apps you have open but my phone is still smooth as silk. I'm glad you are able to make analogies, and lots of them, I just wish they were relevant to my post and not all about ios. Good luck with your many android devices you're the expert around here I see.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] esincho:
Geez, do all are your replies gotta be essays?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Totòòò:
Ever thought about writing a book "story of my life"/"my ipad&I"/"damn ios has so many apps" ;) but yeah try sticking to the topic of this thread

Sent from my BAMF Samsung G/Note
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Made2Last:
GB is a stuttery mess for me on my Note mostly. ICS is smooth on every device I have used including this tablet I am on*. If you think people just want it because the number is 4.0 instead of 2.3 you are kidding yourself.

* the view expressed in this post is my own. We don't have to argue.

Sent from Galaxy Tab 10.1 using XDA Premium App
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Sinful Animosity:
Actually the Asus Prime is running 4.0.3 via OTA.

Like someone else said, people don't want ics for the higher version number. They want it because it really does make everything smoother. Even the prime's OTA is smooth as hell. On my Atrix, ICS is a major improvement over gingerbread, even though it's pieced together with gingerbread drivers.

I don't see why you're arguing with people about us getting ics. No one is forcing you to flash. You can stay on gingerbread while I use my phone to its full potential.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] skyhigh2004:
I'm really glad you are able to repeat the same points in an even longer essay by copying our early posts about this still doesn't make sense. You said the exact same points. forum. Have fun writing your next analogy, we will all get to read it I'm sure.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] polstein:
This.

Why do these threads always seem to disintegrate into 'my os/version is better then yours.' When CM9 comes out, I'll flash it & try it. If I don't like it, I'll flash back (yay backups). Simple as that.

I tried an ICS rom that wasn't quite finished on my HD2. Has problems, so I went back to the more polished & stable CM7. I imagine when CM9 first comes out for the Note, it might need a few months and versions to be 90% + perfect.

Now, if we just want to discuss the feature improvements of ICS (and CM9) vs GB (and no CM7) perhaps a good pro/con list would be simpler. Anyone more familiar with CM9/ICS want to give that a shot?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jb0nd38372:
Every user here that has a Note... When CM9 comes out, try it. Form your own opinion and go from there. What is the need to have 7 pages worth of petty bickering over OPINIONS?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] khaytsus:
I stopped reading his blathering when I realized half the time he's talking about his iSheep device.