yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[LG Nitro HD] mzvast:
I'm really looking forward that oneday I can enjoy a pure and flexible ROM on LU6200.Can anyone help to do such work like CM7?MIUI?

Thanks anyway~
[LG Nitro HD] kumayam:
More likely cm9 due to the nitros 's screen resolution..cm7 only supported with hdpi and mdpi devices.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] x3kaien:
Anyone can give me a script for smooth scrolling for my internet browser?? Or anytip??
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] subha632:
did u try lagfree????
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] CallMeVentus:
There's a build.prop tweak for that

Herpderp Defy.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] x3kaien:
Nope. Please tell me the scripts!! I need it bad

Thanks
[Galaxy S I9000 Themes and Apps] mir2006:
Hi, I don't know if this thread is correctly posted here...

One of my friends has this tone on the i9001 and it's awesome :D but he can't send me it because he has no rooted phone.

Could someone share the "opener" tone here?
[Galaxy S I9000 Themes and Apps] DonPanda:
What is an opener tone and how can I use it? :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Themes and Apps] mir2006:
WOW thanks a lot!! This sound is perfect hahaha :D
[Galaxy S II General] icf80:
Hi,

I have run nmap (from my windows xp machine) against my Samsung Galaxy S2:

Phone: GT-I9100

Android version: 2.3.4

Kernel: Linux/2.6.35.7-I9100XWKI4-CL575468

Command: nmap -v -sT -p1-65535 IP-ADDRESS-HERE-OF-SGS2

Results:

PORT STATE SERVICE

25/tcp open smtp

80/tcp open http

110/tcp open pop3

119/tcp open nntp

143/tcp open imap

465/tcp open smtps

563/tcp open snews

587/tcp open submission

993/tcp open imaps

995/tcp open pop3s

3124/tcp open unknown

3127/tcp open unknown

3128/tcp open squid-http

8008/tcp open http

8080/tcp open http-proxy

8081/tcp open blackice-icecap

8091/tcp open unknown

8888/tcp open sun-answerbook

33003/tcp open unknown

I don't understand why those ports are opened. My phone is not rooted.

Please try to run the same command against your device to test.

Are those ports opened by default? Is this normal?

I have run netstat(after restarting the device) with Terminal Emulator:

$ netstat

Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State

tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:7777 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN

tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:7203 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN

tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:32500 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN

tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:7777 127.0.0.1:42230 ESTABLISHED

tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:42230 127.0.0.1:7777 ESTABLISHED

tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:7777 127.0.0.1:42229 ESTABLISHED

tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:42229 127.0.0.1:7777 ESTABLISHED

tcp6 0 0 ::ffff:10.0.0.67:33003 :::* LISTEN

tcp6 0 0 ::ffff:10.0.0.67:43328 ::ffff:173.194.35.177:443 ESTABLISHED

tcp6 0 0 ::ffff:10.0.0.67:40398 ::ffff:173.194.70.188:5228 ESTABLISHED

tcp6 0 0 ::ffff:10.0.0.67:48864 ::ffff:46.137.161.127:5223 ESTABLISHED

udp6 0 0 :::1900 :::* CLOSE
[Galaxy S II General] okmijnlp:
Open ports are opened on your modem/router, it has nothing to do with your phone. I.e. port 80 is used for websites, etc.
[Galaxy S II General] icf80:
I have run the nmap command on the IP address of my phone. I don't understand what you are trying to say. I have a router of course.
[Galaxy S II General] okmijnlp:
You said you don't understand why the ports are open. They're open because you're on the Internet. Your phone doesn't need to be rooted because it has nothing to do with your phone.

The ports are open on your modem/router, not your phone. There open because they are used to communicate, like 80 is used to communicate with websites, if port 80 was closed, you would have a lot of problems.

Do you understand now?

P.s. Different people will have different ports open depending what they're doing, so there's no need to ask people to post their results.
[Galaxy S II General] Simonetti2011:
If you run NMAP from a computer in the same network as the phone, you'll see that there are no open ports on it, unless you're running network daemons on your phone.
[Galaxy S II General] icf80:
scraps elsometa

try this

http : // IP-ADDRESS-OF-YOUR-SGS2-PHONE : 33003/

from a computer on the lan where also the phone is connect via wi-fi.

I get this:

<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"></head><body></body></html>

An empty page

If I do telnet on it(port 33003) I receive, after writing something random:

HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request

Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"

Server: Linux/2.6.35.7-I9100XWKI4-CL575468 DoaHTTP

Content-Length: 0

Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:11:46 GMT
[Galaxy S II General] VAXXi:
Are you sure you scanned the phone IP ? there are lots of open ports in your scan, but it doesn't match the netstat output (an Android phone wouldn't have ports 25 and 80 open anyway).

Bad news: netstat on Android lacks a "-p" option to show the PID of the listening process. You could do "cat /proc/net/tcp" and get the uid column values (which are actually user IDs) and inquire further from there.

Good news: you shouldn't worry much, as all the listening services you've shown in your netstat are tied to the loopback interface (listening locally and not open to the outside world). When you see something like "*:port_number" or "your.public.ip:port_number" in netstat, that's when you should check the processes.

After cleaning my phone from all Samsung stuff, I still have listening processes on ports 7777, 7203, 5037 and 32500 (all on the loopback interface). 7777 seems to be used for RILD connections from libsecril-client (Samsung's non-free RIL). 5037 seems to belong to ADB. No idea for 7203 and 32500 though.
[Galaxy S II General] hydroxyde:
He seems to think that you're scanning a router's IP address instead of the phone's IP address.
[Galaxy S II General] safepacket:
Your nmap scan output and netstat output does not match. Unless until you running these services on your phone these ports should not be shown as open.

Why don't you download a packet stiffer like "shark for root" and analyze the packet capture(if you know bow to do it)

If you still feel that you scanned the right ip address and you did not install these services then my second suspicion would be a malware or backdoored app on your phone which typically opens up random ports to steal data and send to its c&c servers. Malware can get in to your phone if you use non market app or warez .

Hope that helps.
[Galaxy S II General] VAXXi:
But again, something doesn't match: you're saying netstat shows port 33003 open on an IPv6 interface, but your scan is for a IPv4 interface with 192.168.1.173. And none of the ports match at all, if it was the same device you'd have to have at least 1-2 ports in common.

Your router probably does some automatic port forwarding (UPNP-style) or you're scanning the wrong address. Just for kicks, I've done a nmap on my own phone connected directly to the laptop through WiFi:

vaxxi$ sudo nmap -sT -O -Pn 10.0.2.4

Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-03-19 18:14 CET
Nmap scan report for 10.0.2.4
Host is up (0.015s latency).
Not shown: 999 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
8080/tcp open http-proxy
OS fingerprint not ideal because: Didn't receive UDP response. Please try again with -sSU
No OS matches for host

OS detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at http://nmap.org/submit/ .
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 7.78 seconds

vaxxi$ telnet 10.0.2.4 8080
Trying 10.0.2.4...
Connected to 10.0.2.4.
Escape character is '^]'.
GET / HTTP/1.0

HTTP/1.0 301 Moved Permanently
Location: http:///www/index.html
Content-Length: 0
Connection: close
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:15:02 GMT
Server: Swift1.0

Connection closed by foreign host.

Only port 8080 is open and that is Kies air.
[Galaxy S II General] safepacket:
Best way to judge is to trust your netstat output.

You can run port scanner on your mobile itself on 127.0.0.1 and cross verify.

try this https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.twistandroid.portscan
[Galaxy S II General] VAXXi:
Not really. The 1st thing a decent rootkit would do is to modify the system tools in order to hide itself :)

That portscanner you posted is for scanning other hosts from your phone, not really helpful here. A nmap scan from outside is excellent, but you have to make sure you're scanning the right thing. And perhaps some wiresharking on the Ethernet interface of the device would be helpful.
[Galaxy S II General] safepacket:
Rootkits comes later in the game, For confirming which ports are open in a system as a general rule of thumb netstat is the best way. It will show you what are the listening services simple as that.

NO serivice running no port open.

Nmap undoubtedly is a class, but doing port scanning externally can some times gives false positives depending on network conditions. Infact if you start testing a port scanner the developers compare there scanners against the output of Netstat.

Now since you brought up Rootkits let me say

In my initial post it self i mentioned that open ports on his phone can be due to wrong ip address(router issue) or may be a malware and

also wirsharking idea was mentioned.

icf80 seems to be using only apps from market and i am assuming his system must be clean unless until market has backdoored apps :-)

And lastly please try the scanner on your phone on 127.0.0.1 and it will show you the open ports on your phone. I tried and tested in on mine before sharing the link. Btw nmapping on 127.0.0.1 on linux/win will also work.
[Galaxy S II General] VAXXi:
Sorry, but either you're not understanding my comments or you don't know what you're talking about :)

If I want to keep my listening process hidden, one of the 1st things to do would be modifying the system tools (ls, ps, netstat) to hide my stuff. No tool on a system can be 100% trusted.

For a crappy scanner, perhaps. But if a host is answering on a port, then there's something listening on that port, plain and simple.

Well, duh, but it's irrelevant. As I wrote before: you have several processes on any system which are listening on the local interface for interprocess communication. It's normal to see them when you're looking from your OWN phone ! however, as they're not tied to an external interface, there is no harm in having them since they are not open to the outside world.
[Galaxy S II General] Frostfree:
Funny how some people ask for help then have a go at those who volunteer their assistance :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II General] safepacket:
Dude, i am not talking about a compromised phone which has some root kit installed. OP scanned his phone and found several ports open, Now suspicion is that he scanned on a wrong ip(or some router issue).

To avoid this confusion of ipaddress's i suggested netstat is the best bet assuming his phone is not tampered by a rootkit. This is what logically any one would do.

If you think form a security stand point , rootkits can do wierd things like closing/killing a legit service running on a port and starting a malcious service on the same port so that the user gets fooled that every thing is ok.

Do you think scanning externally can help in above situation. Rootskits have evolved beyond modding (ps/netstat/etc) to a new level.

Bottom line is that if think phone is comparmised nither netstat not scanning externally would give you actual result.

Does that make sense to you ? i hope yes. please correct me if i am wrong , i will be gald to learn some thing new if its right.
[Galaxy S II General] VAXXi:
Yes, that's what I'm saying: on a compromised system nothing can be trusted anymore. That system gets disconnected from everything and you assume the worst onwards. You'd be surprised of what a hidden kernel module can do :rolleyes:

But I highly doubt any current Android malware would go as far to modify low-level tools which aren't known by 90% of users anyway. Most go for easy stuff, like sending premium SMS.

tl;dr and to conclude this discussion:

- his netstat doesn't show anything suspicious

- the external scan matches the fingerprint of a normal web server (with too many open services, but that's something else)

- 99,99% he didn't scan the phone; adding the -O option in nmap would clarify things.
[Galaxy S II General] safepacket:
Agree! On a side note there are android malware's which can steal your call logs,sms and record coversations and lastly capture GPS coordinates.

i recently did some reversing on those samples to demo it to my employer.

Any ways good healthy discussion Cheers mate!
[Galaxy S II General] VAXXi:
Yep, cheers for that. The premium numbers/SMS I can understand (you get money), but always wondered what would malware authors do with call logs and messages. Oh well, guess that's why I'm not into the malware business :) it's a shame indeed that it's such a mess with permissions on Android, good thing we have PDroid and DroidWall.

Now we have to see the OP's response, I'm curious.
[Galaxy S II General] icf80:
First, thank you all for taking of your time for answering.

After more investigations at home and at work where I have both d-link routers I am suspecting the router is doing something for those specific ports and this is why those ports are showing up in the scan.

nmap -v -sT -O -p1-1000 10.0.0.67

Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-03-20 09:35 GTB Standard Time

Initiating ARP Ping Scan at 09:35

Scanning 10.0.0.67 [1 port]

Completed ARP Ping Scan at 09:35, 0.33s elapsed (1 total hosts)

Initiating Parallel DNS resolution of 1 host. at 09:35

Completed Parallel DNS resolution of 1 host. at 09:35, 0.05s elapsed

Initiating Connect Scan at 09:35

Scanning 10.0.0.67 [1000 ports]

Discovered open port 80/tcp on 10.0.0.67

Discovered open port 993/tcp on 10.0.0.67

Discovered open port 21/tcp on 10.0.0.67

Discovered open port 25/tcp on 10.0.0.67

Discovered open port 587/tcp on 10.0.0.67

Discovered open port 143/tcp on 10.0.0.67

Discovered open port 110/tcp on 10.0.0.67

Discovered open port 995/tcp on 10.0.0.67

Connect Scan Timing: About 10.05% done; ETC: 09:40 (0:04:37 remaining)

Increasing send delay for 10.0.0.67 from 0 to 5 due to 11 out of 29 dropped probes since last increase.

Connect Scan Timing: About 34.65% done; ETC: 09:38 (0:01:55 remaining)

Discovered open port 563/tcp on 10.0.0.67

Discovered open port 119/tcp on 10.0.0.67

Discovered open port 465/tcp on 10.0.0.67

Completed Connect Scan at 09:36, 88.88s elapsed (1000 total ports)

Initiating OS detection (try #1) against 10.0.0.67

WARNING: RST from 10.0.0.67 port 21 -- is this port really open?

WARNING: RST from 10.0.0.67 port 21 -- is this port really open?

WARNING: RST from 10.0.0.67 port 21 -- is this port really open?

WARNING: RST from 10.0.0.67 port 21 -- is this port really open?

WARNING: RST from 10.0.0.67 port 21 -- is this port really open?

WARNING: RST from 10.0.0.67 port 21 -- is this port really open?

Nmap scan report for 10.0.0.67

Host is up (0.000067s latency).

Not shown: 989 filtered ports

PORT STATE SERVICE

21/tcp open ftp

25/tcp open smtp

80/tcp open http

110/tcp open pop3

119/tcp open nntp

143/tcp open imap

465/tcp open smtps

563/tcp open snews

587/tcp open submission

993/tcp open imaps

995/tcp open pop3s

MAC Address: ab:cd:ef:gh:ij:kl (Unknown)

Warning: OSScan results may be unreliable because we could not find at least 1 open and 1 closed port

Device type: general purpose

Running: Linux 2.4.X

OS details: Linux 2.4.21

Network Distance: 1 hop

I will you keep you updated I will find more about this.
[Galaxy S II General] DSF:
I recommend OS Monitor for a fast overview of opened (visible) connections. You can see the app that opened the connection + smart whois for external IP.

As of privacy security I use LBE Privacy Guard. And as a firewall DroidWall

All apps are free on the android market
[Galaxy S II General] VAXXi:
Try telneting to these ports from a machine in the same network and see what you receive. Ports 25 and 110 should greet you with a banner, for 80 do a "GET / HTTP/1.0" and press enter twice, you should be served with some content. Then we'll see what's there :rolleyes:
[Wildfire General] elimi:
http://download.cyanogenmod.com/?type=RC&device=buzz. Who has tried it?
[Wildfire General] rocker86:
Hey thanks for the info...

I am downloading the file right now.. Will update after flash.

Seems the download speed is very slow... :(

I was eagerly waiting for the release of RC 7.2 just can't wait to have it....
[Wildfire General] elia222:
only for me download link is down?
[Wildfire General] ford focus:
Nope,for me aswell.:(
[Wildfire General] rocker86:
actually here it is very slow..and after some percent of downloading it got stopped... :(
[Wildfire General] ford focus:
Maybe the server is down :confused:
[Wildfire General] usaff22:
Seems down on my end too :(
[Wildfire General] tonks22:
same here shame really:confused:
[Wildfire General] androiMan:
Downloaded with the torrent link they have on their site..

Will edit after Flashing..

EDIT: Done flashing, worked like a charm...

Predictive dailer Rocks!
[Wildfire General] Warrior--:
Hi,

Can I update my 7.1 version to 7.2 without removing my current ROM and installing this?

Thanks in advance
[Wildfire General] piches:
All,

Please used this link to download

http://www.mediafire.com/?t63jr1gh42222i8

Thanks,

Piches
[Wildfire General] Master_Ellis:
I'm not sure how my post ended up in this thread. My comments below are about the EVo 4G.

Been running the March 17th 7.2 RC 1 build for a few days now. It's running smoothly. I flashed over 7.1 and had some Gmail stability issues so I did a fresh install and all is well. I did flash the latest radio 2.15.00.0808<---4G is fast

Sent From My CM7.X Device.......
[Wildfire General] Master_Ellis:
Yes you can however I had some stability issues with GMail but a fresh install fixed it.

Sent From My CM7.X Device
[Wildfire General] pauch_19@yahoo.com:
is this a much recent update than the one usaff posted few days back?
[Wildfire General] Warrior--:
Could you please tell me how I can do that?

From where should I download the update file? and how am I supposed to install it?

Thanks
[Wildfire General] LucidSomnia:
There is another thread in development section where you can find the update file link for download.
[Wildfire General] huston8:
CM 7.2 RC2

Has anyone tried the ROM CM 7.2 RC2 yet??
[Wildfire General] djinn0:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1554858&page=20
[Wildfire General] [sito_web]:
Yep it's work a bit better than RC1 and now the ICS's animations work perfectly with no problem mirroring!
[Wildfire General] AndroidGadgetCyprus:
Hi, I am kinda a new to the buzz, and I want to know how can I install it?

Sent from my HTC, any thing to say?
[Galaxy S I9000 General] anukilimanoor:
CyanogenMod 7.2 flashing guide and Download
[Galaxy S I9000 General] theKingJan:
Cool thanks

...via Tapatalk 2.0...
[Galaxy S I9000 General] anukilimanoor:
Flashing Video Guide
[Galaxy S I9000 General] nzwizard:
Problem resolved.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TheSG:
Is world of goo and they need to be fed works on our beloved ace?

Play store says that they work.Just wanna confirm.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] franzks:
They need to be fed works great on my Ace. Sadly, World of Goo can't run on our Ace. Are you sure the play store stated that it is compatible? Or maybe I can't access it from my region?
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TheSG:
Thx bro for telling.

Play says that world of goo is compatible with ace.
[Galaxy S II Accessories] chinmayanaokar:
Hey guys I just saw a 3500mAh battery for SGS2 on ebay. Is it safe to use such battery? I mean it won't harm the phone, will it? :O
[Galaxy S II Accessories] MistahBungle:
Probably won't harm the phone, no.

I bought a 3500mAh obscurely branded Chinese battery in mid-December. Tried it out for almost two weeks, a bunch of charge/discharge cycles & estimated its real capacity was around 1900mAh. It also used to heat up a lot on recharge (mid-high 40's Celsius, which isn't normal when the phone isn't being used whilst charging).

I took it back, got a refund & bought an original Samsung 2000mAh battery. Hasn't missed a beat, is obviously close to its advertised capacity given I get around 20% more use out of a charge than I do with a 1600mAh battery.

Obviously your mileage may vary if you buy one of these (you might have a better experience than I did), just thought I'd let you know about my experience.
[Galaxy S II Accessories] chinmayanaokar:
Thank you very much! :)
[Galaxy S II Accessories] beston94:
Well i heard that their batteries exploded in their phones......so be careful.....better pay for a better one instead of having a chance to ruin your expensive phone.
[Galaxy S II Accessories] Simonetti2011:
I have one of those I got from DealExtreme and it is great. It lasts 2x longer than the original Samsung battery.

I take care not to swap them often, because I am afraid that this action might damage the original cover, eventually breaking it.
[Galaxy S II Accessories] rustedfate:
Battery Life

I am still using the 1650 mAh battery (stock) for my S2.

I am really facing some battery issues. Its charging almost all day !

Yes I am using 3G all day and WiFi HotSpot too. But use wifi at home. Thats when I get good battery life. Any better way to conserve some battery ?

Any tips might help

Thanks
[Galaxy S II Accessories] johamot:
Got mine a few days ago from eBay and its been fine so far. It last more than 2x the regular battery. Phone does not heat up or anything strange..
[Galaxy S II Accessories] chenrp:
well i an getting with the original battery 24H of usage.

with the 3500mah i am getting 60H of usage... so my 3500 is truly 3500mah!

the language is hebrew.

i use congnition rom 1.51 and siyah kernel.
[Galaxy S II Accessories] Dramadeur:
So, where can I see a trustful review on batteries for SGS2? What is the most extended one?

It's really frustrating that my current stock battery is only enough for 2 hd video view (4-5 hours).

Also, the higher the mAh value the more battery lifetime is, right?

I would really want to buy 3500 mAh, but it costs so little.

And the official Samsung variant that offers the longest lifetime of a battery for SGS2 is this one, maybe Mugen 3500 mAh is the best choice out there?

What is the model name of the battery? Is it being overheated in comparison to stock one?
[Galaxy S II Accessories] chenrp:
why should it overheat?

it is lithium ... same same
[Galaxy S II Accessories] VAXXi:
Yes, it's special lithium from China extracted under full moon and blessed by a thousand virgins :)

Really now, if it was possible to manufacture a battery having more than double the capacity of the stock battery while taking up the same volume, don't you think the megacorporate Samsung would buy that technology immediately in order to use it themselves ? "Too cheap to be true" is valid even here; most knock-off batteries either are fake ("9999 mAH SUPER EXTRA" sticker over the original rating), or will degrade quickly in time leaving you with a dud.

Since there are already fake electronic components...

... why not fake and cheap batteries too, certainly seems to be a high demand for them.
[Galaxy S II Accessories] chenrp:
a. it is not the same volume! in is twice as much as the original.

b. the i9100 has a circuit that allows a slow stable charge rate so i dont think it will damage the battery.
[Galaxy S II Accessories] MistahBungle:
As well as being made of inferior materials, not being subjected to the same QC, not having the fuel gauge chip present in original Samsung batteries, you pretty much get what you pay for.

My advice would be to avoid non-original batteries altogether, and given a 2000mAh original battery will cost around the same as one of these 3000mAh+ batteries with all their problems & poor life, it's a no brainer.

Stick with Samsung batteries.
[Galaxy S II Accessories] chenrp:
fuel gauge chip?

i would like to see that chip in an any cellphone battery please.
[Galaxy S II Accessories] MistahBungle:
If you're not aware of/don't know about the fuel gauge chip in original SGS2 batteries, you've probably been living under a rock since the phone was released :rolleyes: