yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pushtostop:
Hi

Mate from ur post it sounds like u have not installed recovery ,

try the app in this thread

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=21237127

Just install app,then install recovery from that option inside the app .

V easy

Goodluck
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rexhyd:
Hi,

I tried to push the DoomKernel through Flashtool after rebooting to fastboot through the tool.The tool says success and i can see on my phone the Kernel as Doomkernel Chaos#19. But if i restart the phone, it reverts back to the stock kernel.I tried this for almost 5-6 times and had the same issue. Then I pushed the Adriano Martins Stock plus_1.9 kernel and flashed the Prerooted LT15i .62FW.It worked fine. Then i flashed the Arconium ROM but hte root access has gone.

Again reverted back to Prerooted ROM and its fine now.

Still wanted to know how to push the DoomKernel.

Rgds,

RxHy
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pushtostop:
Flash in fastboot

Command is "fastboot flash boot boot.img"

Just put boot.img in same folder as fastboot file s

Connect phone to pc while holding menu key.(fastboot mode)

In fastboot folder put mouse on empty space hold shift and right click then click open command window here

Then type command , hit enter and it should flash and say ok

Now unplug and enjoy

Goodluck
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] CocoCormier:
Hey guys.

My GNex's USB port recently stopped working, so is there any way to get it back to stock (for warranty purposes)? Would adb wireless work?

Thanks in advance.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Emhalwis:
I'm guessing downloading mobile Odin and finding a stock image to flash. All done from your phone.

Edit: I don't know if you can relock your bootloader. Will any terminal app helps.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Unlawful:
I doubt one can lock their bootloader from mobile terminal due to that fact that oem lock is from fastboot. But then again, I may be wrong.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] GuestK0097:
it's impossible! sure you can access adb over the network but the bootloader is only configurable trough the usb with fastboot. seems like you need to fix your usb port to relock the bootloader :-/
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] CocoCormier:
Ok thanks, that's what I thought and feared.

I'll go and try to get it exchanged with the bootloader unlocked then, and hope for the best.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Trevorhimself:
How did the replacement go? I'm in the same sort of situation... I plugged my phone in tonight and the power port shorted, burnt the end of the charge cable and needless to say the port no longer works.

I'm debating going through Bell Warranty or using the Insurance coverage which comes with a charge. Gotta love the UNLOCKED Icon when you boot the phone :|
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] CocoCormier:
Well after using mobile odin to flash stock images, the usb port magically started working again, although only partially, and I could relock the bootloader, so I don't know what would have happened with it unlocked.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Trevorhimself:
strange, glad it worked out for you! I went for the replacement phone through the Bell insurance option, It'll be here within 3 business days. Given my power port is physically burnt I'm not so lucky.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] PlusAndroid:
You want to use your phone while you're walking? Make your screen transparent!

This app gives you the opportunity to use your phone as usual, while being able to see the image of your camera transparently on the entire screen.

ScreenShots

Download :

Transparent Screen

Transparent Screen PRO
[HTC Wildfire S] krakout:
Hello,

Apologies for asking this usually stupid question; normally I try all ROMs by myself and find out which one I like best, but this is form my wifey's WFS, so I can't do extensive testing...

Can someone tell me which ROM gives the best battery life and low memory footprint (available memory)?

Thanks in advance!
[HTC Wildfire S] hardikrajgor123:
CM7 RC1 - Alquez
[HTC Wildfire S] krakout:
Thanks, I really appreciate it. It surely looks small at 90MB, downloading now...
[HTC Wildfire S] krakout:
Btw, which are the MarvelC/MarvelCT devices? How do I know if I've got one of these? It's got a SIM so I assume it's a Marvel? (didn't even know there existed SIM-less devices!)
[HTC Wildfire S] Lt.Win:
Boot into your bootloader. Do that by pressing volume up and power when phone is switched off. If it boots normally, disable fastboot in settings > power. It should say on the first line:

****** PVT SHIP S-ON / S-OFF RL

****** = MARVEL / MARVELC / MARVELCT

Sent from my HTC Wildfire S powered by CyanogenMod 7.2
[HTC Wildfire S] krakout:
Yup, it's a plain Marvel alright. Thanks again :)
[HTC Wildfire S] blade30p:
I tried Cm7, wasn't impressed. Now I've been running jxmatteo v1.2 for 2 weeks & its truly amazing. Sense 3.5 runs sweet, rooted & deodexed, oh & with wifi running 24/7 I still get two days out of my battery. The stock rom that came with my fone wasn't even that good, got a day at best b4 I had to charge it. Honestly, try jxmatteo you won't be dissapointed

sent from my freshly unlocked, rooted wildfire
[HTC Wildfire S] krakout:
Thanks for the suggestion... battery sound sweet. But I'm not crazy about Sense (heck, even HTC themselves said it's become a pile of crap) to tell you the truth. How much memory have you got left after installing?

Thanks again!
[HTC Wildfire S] BigChillin:
Please tell me why, with over 500 posts, your still posting general questions in a development thread.

Sent from my HTC_A510c
[HTC Wildfire S] krakout:
Uh... by mistake, obviously. I had opened all the sub-fora and probably hit the New Thread button in the wrong tab... Apologies.
[HTC Wildfire S] kagevazquez:
Lmao I was thinking the same thing and its amazing nobody else noticed this
[HTC Wildfire S] matt5eo:
LOL^^ I was just looking on the thanks he got but didn't saw the 500 posts :D

Epic fail.
[HTC Wildfire S] krakout:
Ah yes, because derailing a thread is, like, totally mature and a flawless win! Rad, man!

Tsk...
[HTC Wildfire S] BigChillin:
I will "derail" any thread that adds clutter to the dev section. And promptly direct it to the proper section, where not only does it not clutter this place up, more people will also feel more inclined to help you.

Sent from my HTC_A510c
[HTC Wildfire S] krakout:
Moving it to the appropriate place, fine.

Giving a note to me, fine.

Discussing how "fail it is, dude, LOL", because of how high and mighty one is, is not only immature but also makes things worse.

Oh, also, my comment was not directed to you, as you could have seen by the fact that I did, in fact, reply to your post directly and answered your question.
[HTC Wildfire S] BigChillin:
My honest mistake. I apologize.

Sent from my HTC_A510c
[HTC Wildfire S] krakout:
No problem, thanks.
[HTC Wildfire S] kill3rlook5:
wooh......i am starting to feel the heat...please people lets all be cool......and lets do something bout the topics we can help out with.........
[HTC Wildfire S] mgavrano:
so, which rom now in 2014 has the best batt life?
[HTC Wildfire S] KidCarter93:
These kind of questions (and also these kind of threads) aren't allowed on XDA as they have such a high chance of causing arguments/disputes.

As we all prefer different types of ROMs, different types of kernels and have such different usage of our devices, someone's answer can never really help us as everyone's will have a different opinion. You may even end up missing out on a great ROM purely due to the fact that others haven't mentioned it.

Therefore, I'll always suggest that you test ROMs out for yourself so that you can definitely be sure how suitable a particular ROM is for you :)

Also, for future reference, don't find a thread from almost 2 years ago and bump it up to the top of the forum.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thread Moved to Q&A and Closed

As this thread wasn't noticed when it was first created, I've moved this over to Q&A (as it definitely doesn't belong in the development forum) and will have closed the thread as well as we don't allow this kind of thread on XDA.

Regards,

- KidCarter93

Forum Moderator
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DaKidSlim:
Read here

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Sams...ng-GALAXY-Note-instead-of-Android-4.0_id27693
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DaKidSlim:
I actually wouldnt mind skipping ics and getting jellybean instead
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Jamesyboy:
A long time ago, Samsung promised to release an additional update wih more S-Pen software and better functionality. I dont remember when, but it was at least a few weeks ago. Search aound and youll find it. Angry Birds space isnt an update. Its a completely new game. Just like Rovio does whenever it has a new theme...Rio...Seasons...you get the idea. So unless the Korean translations were crap (Sammy is known for their terrifying translations...remember the galaxy tab site?) this means that there will be a software update (either a ROM or a update for the S-Memo type apps) and a new "suite" of apps that we'll get from the Samsung app store that'll include a note specific version of Angry Birds space with a free bonus episode and(that others will have to purchase via in app purchasing), and a note-only bonus level.

In short...Samsung never once mentioned anything along the lines of a "value pack"...in fact, on the contrary. This is speak of a galactic update.

Not to mention the fact that there are already official ICS ROM leaks...and Samsung has announced the update already for couple countries.

If you had read the article and checked the source,you'd know that there is actually 0 evidence of this.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] MSigler:
Weird logical leap. Note will get ICS.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] kimtyson:
They're skipping ICS and going to blow everyone away with JellyBean. Right?:rolleyes:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] envision:
It would be stupid for them to not release ICS for the note or the galaxy S II phones all these phones have great specs for running ICS. Besides if they don't release it there will be many roms available
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Sarius24:
Canadian carriers clearly show ICS available 2012 would really suck if they lie.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] gordec:
Remember the post refers to the international Note, and the International Note already has leaked ICS. So likely it will get official ICS.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] stulzerl:
it is coming. just don't know when.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v​=wcoW7sh-FBk#t=02m40​s
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Envy Diz:
Broken Link bud.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Sarius24:
Sigh. =/ can you update us?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] omnimanx1:
I don't have good news but I can share what the experience was for us Samsung Infuse 4g users.

We all started with Froyo and the promise of a Ginger Bread update. Here we are many months later still on Froyo. There was an official Update to Ginger Bread in the beginning of February that was promptly pulled because of all the issues it had.

When I saw that the note was supposed to be released with Ginger Bread with the promise of an ICS update ... I was stunned at the similarity of what Samsung was doing. I am almost certain we even got an Angry Birds update somewhere in August... yet we still to this date have Froyo.

With this in mind and the Fact that Samsung isnt being a speedy updater.. I would suggest moving forward and making the most of what you have right now.

I hope they release your ICS soon but the fact that there are leaks means nothing...we have had Ginger Bread leaks since october last year. Thus it is no indication of an official release. It is more like small teases to keep us on the string.

On the bright side we have had several great devs over at the Infuse 4g forums that made our lives a little easier. Taking the GB leaks and developing ROMs. Most of the ROMs were great and were indeed GB based ROMs. There were a couple of issues however. No Bluetooth and HDMI support as the kernels the devs had to work with didn't support them for some reason. I am sure they explained it a million times.. LOL.

Dman ... who developed several great ROMs and a few ports.. was amazing. I heard he now had a gnote. So cross your fingers that he will be doing some great work here as well.

To sum up...

Don't get in a hurry for an Update to ICS. Don't believe what Samsung or ATT says about Samsung updates PERIOD.

:)

Myself....I will be holding out for the note until I see an official ICS.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Talderon:
This is why I have ALWAYS been so shy about going to a Samsung phone.

Good thing is, if something with similar hardware releases with ICS, we'll have the drivers we need and we can just Root and jump on the ROM train.

That's why I decided on Samsung this time around. :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] viny2cool:
everything changed with LTE coming to ATT...if there was no LTE in ATT note or International Gnote also had LTE, then i am sure we could port Int Gnote's rom....

Thats what happened with Captivate...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Talderon:
I don't doubt there will be ports or anything. That's the main factor that got me to go ahead with this phone, the great community here at XDA!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] joshnichols189:
There won't be ports.. they're completely different devices :/
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] stulzerl:
sorry for the broken link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcoW...UCGXQYbcTJ33bKVnsGmCOvjxFwie3CXg1dO5_DiLQaHR0

this link should work

minute 2:38
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rogsoccerman:
Cool we have confirmation of ics!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Aerials:
For US phones, basically unless you get one of the Nexus phones, you should never expect to get any timely OTA updates. It's still mostly the US phone carriers to blame more so than the phone vendors themselves. Like I'm sure Samsung isn't actually intentionally delaying ICS forever on purpose.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Underground_XI:
it is coming in may
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] kimtyson:
Source please otherwise BS.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] littlewierdo:
Absolutely agreed.

Samsung is the worst for software updates.

They actually claimed that the Captivate could not even run ICS because the hardware on the Cappy could not handle touchwiz + ICS. To my knowledge, the Cappy is still on Froyo (officially).

And I wouldnt bother with reading any of the rumors of when any updates are coming as they mean nothing. Trust me, I spent weeks with the Captivate hoping for information on official updates before I finally gave up.

In fact, to show you just how ****ed up this whole situation is, here is a post claiming the Note and the Galaxy II line of phones was to get ICS on March 1rst.

http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/10/ice-c...samsung-galaxy-s-ii-galaxy-note-on-march-1st/

Now, I dont personally care really about what version of Android Im running because each version comes with its own set of problems. The ONLY reason I care about later versions is security fixes. But thats it. ICS brings no new features or functionality to the phone and in fact, in alot of ways, looses functionality (alot less options to tweak and adjust) because Google seems to have focused on beautifying the OS at the cost of reducing the number of tweaks / options that can be made.

In fact, I would venture a guess that because of Touchwiz, ICS probably would not bring any of the nice visual touches that ICS brings to the table, it will likely look exactly the same as what we already have.

We have the latest version of GB (at least as far as I can tell, Im unable to find the changelogs for Android. This is a good thing, most of the changes made from here on out that involve security can be pushed out directly by Google thru the Market (when you launch the market, they can 'force' updates that contain security fixes but does not increase any version number information).

Trust me, it isnt worth the chase to try to track down anything and unlike Eclair to Froyo where there was a performance improvement, GB to ICS isnt going to bring anything new to the table.

Personally, Id like to see an official update to allow NFC before I get all worked up about ICS.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] CreekDirt:
ICS, on a Touchwiz device, is not a factor for me. If it has security fixes then sure sign me up.

I can't agree about Samsung being the worst for pushing newer firmwares. They were really good about updating the SGS2. That is really my only litmus test because it was my first Android phone.

And as far as rumors go...your BGR link was a great example of the rumor mill. The SGS2 will receive ICS starting next week. Samsung is delivering what they promised and the head of Samsung USA said the i717 will receive it as well.

Having a few HoneyComb tablets laying around makes ICS uninteresting to me since it won't be a brand new user experience. Hopefully JellyBean will be more about user functionality than eye candy.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Vcolassi:
Yea trust me i have ICS on my Transformer Prime. Its great but nothing to lose sleep over. I don't have a huge problem with TW i just wish it were a little snappier. The thing i like most about ICS on my Transformer Prime and what i have seen on the Galaxy Nexus is the "newer" icon's and font lol. But i can get that in ADW launcher with a theme.

That all said, i think Touch Wiz ICS update will look very familiar to the interface we currently have now with a few added features.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] cmunho:
The biggest reason I want ICS? It will allow me to download some more "tablet" based apps like Sketchbook Pro. It supports pressure sensitivity on the OS level rather than through an SDK. It's possible for me to use other painting apps that are only available for a tablet.

That's really my only reason. Otherwise I could care less. But a tablet like the Note needs it for proper pen integration.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Vcolassi:
That is a logical reason. There is some downside to that too. A **** ton of apps still aren't compatible with my Prime being its on ICS. Dumb stuff too like HBO Go :rolleyes:. I could easily write a list lol.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] C0BRA01:
ICS on the US Note

Well for whatever it's worth, I asked when ICS would be available, and there was a Samsung rep in the AT&T store when I was picking up my Note, and she said April. (Like I said, for whatever it's worth, but I am crossing my fingers, and toes.)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] baudilus:
DISAGREE

My LG Thrill went more than a year on Froyo, while LG promised an upgrade to gingerbread "soon."

Needless to say, it's still on Froyo, and that's what prompted me to jump on the Note and back to Samsung. At least with Samsung the ROMs have a tendency to "leak" and I can do what I need.

Now my Thrill is my work phone so I'm still hoping for an update, but it's less important.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] baudilus:
For what it's worth, I think that "Galactic Update" is ICS and "Premium Suite" is updates / additions to the software already designed for the Note's S Pen, including the new Angry Birds.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] littlewierdo:
Right, well, believe what you want, Im just saying, dont be disappointed if it takes a year for any OS updates to happen. By the time ICS comes out for the Note, Jellybean will likely be here or damn close.

Let me give you an idea, the Samsung Captivate received TWO firmware updates since its release in July of 2010. The first was an update for Eclair that fixed (for some) gps locking and improved media scanning when the phone initially booted.

The second update was to update the phone from Eclair to Froyo which improved performance by as much as a 50% speed improvement due to the changes made in the java environment that Google implemented in Android. I should note that this Froyo update came TWO months BEFORE GINGERBREAD (the version of Android AFTER Froyo) was finished baking and released to the phone manufacturers.

I dont buy these rumors that I read all over the place, Samsung has a proven track record. The full potential of these phones lies in the rom developers hands to unlock because Samsung certainly has no idea what they are doing in the OS department.

Makes me wish that the rumor I read last year that Samsung was going to open source their OS's and allow the Cyanogen team to take over the OS development for their phones was true.

They should stick to making the hardware and have someone who has a clue do the OS.

*Small correction*

Apparently the Captivate has a third update that is ONLY available via connecting the phone to the PC and using Kies mini (software specifically designed for updating Samsung phones and has no other functionality). You cannot get Gingerbread via OTA.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] C0BRA01:
ICS compatibility

I have an HD2, and the only reason I gave it up was for the dual core, and the larger screen.

I have ICS installed on it. I had run into ZERO programs that would not run on it. Every app I ran on Gingerbread, or Froyo before that, I was running on ICS. I know if the density is set wrong, a lot of apps won't be seen, but that you will run into with GB, or Froyo, and is not an ICS issue.

I have ICS running on my Transformer, and with the exception of TV Guide, which they acknowledge doesn't work right on ICS, I have again run into really hardly anything that doesn't run on it. yes, there are programs that won't run right on it, but far fewer than you make it sound. Please don't make exaggerations about ICS compatibility and state them as fact.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Chief Geek:
I cant think of any apps that I didnt have waiting on me when I took my Vibrant from GB to ICS.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] baudilus:
For what it's worth, my Captivate was running a custom Gingerbread ROM for quite a while before I dropped it and broke the screen.

My point was, there were still ways to get the latest OS, even when the releases were not "official." With LG, not so much. I could upgrade it to GB, but I would lose the 3D and HDMI capabilities of the phone.

Let me share some insight I've gained into the workings of a carrier approved update (at least with AT&T).

1. The manufacturer works on the build, finalizes it, then sends it to AT&T.

2. AT&T loads up their bloatware, verifies it, and sends it to Google.

3. Google pass / fails it based on minimum performance specs.

In this process, I believe Samsung has leaked their ROMs between step 1 and 2 on many occasions, or perhaps they get the pass from Google on their international versions (with no AT&T bloat), and when AT&T's bloatware causes it to fail, at least they leak it (or someone at Samsung takes it and leaks it).

I wouldn't be surprised if there is an ICS update available in a custom ROM weeks after it's released for the international version, just without working LTE.

Someone at LG could've done that (because from what I hear, the software failed Google's stress test after AT&T bloated it up).
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Chief Geek:
This is a subject of debate, and quite common one at that. Many say that AT&T do not touch the image themselves, but rather give their requirements of bloat to samsung to roll into the image.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] qnet:
Well, I hope it does update to ICS. I watched a video of a leaked version on the Gnote and it looked real nice and seemed to make touchwiz run even smoother.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] AllGamer:
the original SGS1 also got a lot of updates

only the USA carriers versions were delayed to in some cases forever almost

but whn i was running the i9000 we got updates almost every 3 months