yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[SuperSU] Cookie Ninja:
I'm on 5.1.1 OPX, various ROMs (stock OOS / H2OS and CM 12.1). On the earlier stable (2.67) there was never a problem, but on upgrading to 2.76, whenever I initiate a reboot, there is some unknown app asking for root permission, which I cannot see / deny/grant because of the reboot dialogue window....anyone else facing similar issues? Similar behaviour observed on Find7S (5.1,1) also....sceenshot attached...

Edit....after reboot, su log shows no app that has been denied / timed out root access. Problem disappears on flashing older su through twrp recovery....

Dead Cookies leave no trails...

---------- Post added at 17:13 ---------- Previous post was at 16:57 ----------

Adding screenshot

Dead Cookies leave no Trails......
[SuperSU] __DS__:
HTC One M8, Android 6.0, Sense 7.0

Installed UPDATE-SuperSU-v2.76-20160630161323.zip in systemless mode, all seems to be OK. I installed systemless xposed (still no problems) and found what SuperSU icon absent from application list.

Install from market show error 505, from adb: Failure [INSTALL_FAILED_UPDATE_INCOMPATIBLE]

I install only apk from version 2.66, all working now (binaries still 2.76, systemless).

Any ideas what is wrong with 2.76 ?
[SuperSU] ktmom:
Have you looked at the SuperSu log? Run a logcat while triggering the problem?
[SuperSU] nicolap8:
Lower the supersu timeout to 1 sec.

reboot

read the supersu log

restore the timeout
[SuperSU] -Duir-:
Did either of you have any luck with latest version (2.76)? I have just converted my M8 to GPe and am getting the exact same issue with 2.76 but 2.74-2 installs just fine. Alternately, 2.76 was installed just fine before I had converted it. I have tried TWRP 2.8.7.0, 3.0.0-0, and 3.0.2-0 all with the same log results as already posted, but attached my logs just the same.

That post has no relevance to this.
[SuperSU] simonbigwave:
I got stuck on boot animation logo after update binaries supersu v2. 76., on Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos, had to reflash AOKP rom to fix when using AOKP marshmallow on my Samsung Grand Duos i9082. also some other guys also apparently had same issue on the HTC M9 forum with 2,76 version. older version supersu2,64 no problems were noted.
[SuperSU] GayCasper:
Can anyone tell me if there is just a flashable binary?
[SuperSU] egingell:
No. Just flash the zip in the OP. If you're having problems, go to the support thread linked in the OP.

Sent from: SGS5 - MM 6.0.1 / SGS4 - LP 5.0.1
[SuperSU] billubakra:
Why is this off topic here? All I am asking is how to replace KingUser with SuperSu.
[SuperSU] Sam Nakamura:
Exactly, but as you may have seen this thread is about one specific version of super su, it's not a guide how to replace another root application, and this topic is pretty much discussed on the Web.. So Google should help and by the way you can flash custom recovery, unroot kingroot and flash supersu zip via recovery..
[SuperSU] billubakra:
I Googled a method but it didn't work. So, I thought to post here for a method to replace kinguser. I am a noob so flashing custom recovery etc. is not my cup of tea.
[SuperSU] Sam Nakamura:
Then you better leave it as it is...
[SuperSU] glauberlima:
Your recovery.log is showing me that the exactly same error has been happening on your device too. That's wired :P

Did you manage to install 2.76 from scratch?
[SuperSU] ashyx:
It should work on pretty much any mobile platform.

DONATE ME HERE IF YOU WANT TO BUY ME A BEER OR HIT THE THANKS BUTTON IF I HELPED YOU
[SuperSU] nanodan:
I'm on a OnePlus 3, rooted and unlocked. All root apps work great.

One problem I have however is with the newest version of Kernel Adiutor. It says "No root." even though the previous version worked fine. I don't even get a prompt to grant root access, and SuperSU doesn't show requests for root in its logs.

Is this problem with my SuperSU binary (2.76) or KA?
[SuperSU] ZRK_NanDRD:
For those that are facing a problems flashing SU-2.76 here's an alternative which may help.

Superuser Aroma Installer (System/Systemless) SU-2.76

Thread

http://xdaforums.com/apps/supersu/supersu-aroma-installer-t3414877

Downlad .zip: SU-2.76 systemless

http://xdaforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3807827&d=1468069141
[SuperSU] BrunoJeric:
Hi can someone clear this to me.

If i flash superSu.zip on my xperia currently running on stock 6.0.1 will i have root acess? In other words does flashing zip file roots my phone

Thx in advance :)
[SuperSU] Sam Nakamura:
Yes, that's what it is supposed to do.. When flashed with custom recovery
[SuperSU] BrunoJeric:
Thank you :good: :)
[SuperSU] seanhanrei2000:
how to fix this?
[SuperSU] ktmom:
Contact the app developer. PIE is a security feature introduced started to be enforced in Lollipop. It's was introduced in Jellybean I think.
[SuperSU] rush9935:
Help !

Hello,

My phone is a ( Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo sm-903w from Canada) I did root the phone with CF-auto root after install twrp after I did insert (su) in my card sd flash su updated su from the playstore and now look at the picture something like ( super su into/system not ( currently)alailable in system-less root mode ?

Can someome help me please ?

Thank you
[SuperSU] mielletseed:
Why help you, what#s your problem? Your device seems to bee rooted correctly in systemless mod. That's meaning no changes to /system where done and therefore SuperSU won't install to system. You can't root Samsung devices (lollipop and up) root in system mode since there have to be done patches to the SELinux policies which only where done in systemless mode (or you would need an permissive kernel).

My advice - don't change your configuration ...
[SuperSU] rush9935:
thx friend !
[SuperSU] hacknmtk:
The best thing to do rather than upgrading from the play store, is to come here and get the new flashable zip to flash in recovery. The scripts in the zip will put things where they need to go, whereas the play store version doesn't.

I would get the new zip and flash it and see if it fixes things :).
[SuperSU] rush9935:
#1

Thank you

I will wait.....
[SuperSU] Pkt_Lnt:
It is rooted systemless exactly as it should be. There is NOTHING that needs fixed! :rolleyes:

---------- Post added at 12:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:14 PM ----------

NO DON'T! That is very bad advice.
[SuperSU] hacknmtk:
Ok... I'll stop trying to help then. :(
[SuperSU] egingell:
That's not entirely true. My SGS4 has Lollipop and system mode while my SGS5 has systemless mode with Marshmallow.

The Play Store app updates just fine, even systemless.

Sent from: SGS5 - MM 6.0.1 / SGS4 - LP 5.0.1
[SuperSU] mielletseed:
Didn't know that there are 5.0.1 Samsung stock ROMs - thought they skipped it and jumped directly to 5.1 lollipop and for 5.1 is root without a patched kernel not possible, sorry.
[SuperSU] DJ_SpaRky:
Yes, and automatically updated back, oh well not a big deal. Thanks.
[SuperSU] jumperalex:
FWIW, I just did this, [see post above] and first I unisntalled the updated and then immediatly "disabled" the app. Now SuperUser no longer shows up in my app list ... in fact it doesn't even show up in my disabled app list (unlike face recognition which still shows up [shrug]. I did this in the parking lot while taking a break from work and didn't have much time to muck about. At some point I'll likely dig back in to ensure there are no SuperUser remnants.
[SuperSU] gleenfield97:
lbe currently is not compatible with JB (reminds me how it's not compatible with CM7/MIUI last time).

many people has this issue as well.
[SuperSU] Pkt_Lnt:
I am running SuperSU Pro on my Kindle Fire with Jelly Bean just fine. Works perfectly. Not to say you are wrong, but I think it depends on device and whether it is a manufacturer ROM or custom.
[SuperSU] shinobisoft:
I'm running Jelly Bean, wip, with SuperSU installed with no issues whatsoever. My device is no longer supported by LG or AT&T.
[SuperSU] peeyourownpants:
yeah. over on rw http://rootzwiki.com/topic/19302-aokp-toro-milestone-6/, lots of us are solving constant permissions pop ups from su on the aokp jb previews for toro with supersu 0.94. thanks chainfire. lots of us are pushing for supersu to be part of aokp's jb builds.
[SuperSU] TMFGO45:
I think maybe the app he was referring to that doesn't work were the 2 apps causing force closes, not actually the SuperSU app....correct me if I'm wrong...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus! (AOKP M6 , Leankernel 3.10.0, 4.0.4 Radios, Inverted Gapps, TWRP 2.2 Recovery)
[SuperSU] peeyourownpants:
supersu is now in aokp's latest jb test builds! and is working well.
[SuperSU] G3-SCORPIO:
Chainfire I found the problem in SuperSU. When I run the terminal on the phone, the changes PATH . In this case ROOT is and everything works fine.

Maybe it will be an occasion to reconsider the application.

In version 093, I did not notice this.

SuperSU has more privileges than the Superuser. This tells me that SuperSU bypasses root access on my phone.

If I type a command at the ADB SU in Superuser, I get a # prompt. And yours program, I do not see the prompt #

I installed the latest version of busybox 1.20.2 http://www.busybox.net/

This is not good that SuperSU gives more privileges to other programs. Other programs can then change the system-level code data or changes the PATH, as in my case. Sometimes an application with the FC Multi Mount CD-Card

I suspect that you have not changed much in contrast to the previous version.

You just have given more privileges applications. We must solve this problem. Why do the source code a secret?

I remember that you're just not finished until the end of the application Chainfire3D.

There is still no fix CF3D driver and many applications have in black graphics.

I really hope you fix at least SuperSU. And do not tell me that you do not know what the problem. I'm sure you know all these shortcomings, but for some reason remain silent about them and do nothing. I bought your program and said thank you many times, and in response I have not seen any answer that might help. With respect to you.
[SuperSU] :
Been using SuperSu on CM10 Skank on toroplus Galaxy Nexus and all has been great. Tks!:thumbup:
[SuperSU] jwds1978:
Why do people keep asking irrelevant questions? He has zero obligation to release the source to anybody. He has every right not to release it. Moreover, as a software developer myself, I wouldn't either; and, in fact, I don't... Exception being, titles which are specifically designated as being open-sourced. I've never released the source to a paid application, no matter how many hundreds have *****ed and moaned about not having access to it, nor do I intend to start any time soon either; it's my software, and my choice.
[SuperSU] G3-SCORPIO:
I think so, that if a person has done the program and takes the money for it, and then does not want to help in its development, it may give others the opportunity to find those errors, which lead to some FC.

And then it turns out I bought the program and have the right to demand its a good job, but instead, I can not do anything because I do not have this capability.

Then I did a firmware for the phone I9000 and successfully sell it. If a person meets some difficulties, I help him immediately. There are many people, not only in Russia. I help with ICQ and other users who have bought firmware. I always help them in everything, because im took money from them.

I believe that is correct. Once he took the money, so be kind, to work out the money.

Must be responsible. I bought the application Chainfire3D.

But in the end, I can not use it fully, as he not finish the driver.

In Russia, the developer is obliged to help others if he took money from them.

Take the example of Programmes at Titanium Backup

The developer is constantly looking for possible solutions and communicates regularly with users and they are grateful that the program is stable.

And if he does not want help to understand, let them at least will allow others to fix rpm being. At the moment I'm not very happy with the program.

There are many mistakes in her work. So rather than wait until someone makes a stable application, I find it easier to complete it yourself and not wait until someone have mercy.

I do not mind to give more money, but that would have justified the money all my hopes. I'm also not against the test and give the logs on my device. But whatever the result justified the means that I give. Let the program then it's worth five times as much, but that she was stable, and as the position, not at random.

Here is another good example:

Do I need to figure out the cause of the poor performance of the program? However, I found that the program does use those resources, and me was forced to find out the cause. I repeat. I am obliged to do it or the developer?

Well here is understandable, because the program is still being tested. And in this case, the money has already been taken.

stew721 What version do you use? Paid or unpaid? I think like you do not buy a program that would say so. And I almost always buy all of the programs, and most programs are not high quality.

I have nothing against closed source, but then you have to evolve all the time, rather than throwing their customers. Even if it is a good man, but it may help to understand at least. And do not say that he is not with it.
[SuperSU] DJ_SpaRky:
I actually just found the CWM flash able and it removes the old and replaces with SuperSu.
[SuperSU] jwds1978:
Regardless of how you try to rationalize it, the source code thing has been done to death. It's absolutely his choice and nobody elses as to whether or not it gets released; now or ever. Whether an application is free or paid has no bearing on whether the source is open or not.

If you don't trust the security of the application, aren't happy with the application's development, aren't happy with support by the developer, or whatever else, you have a few choices... Develop a replacement application yourself, use another application of similar functionality, hire somebody to develop a new replacement application; to name a few.

Also, it's not so bad with me as the majority of my software titles are valued in the hundreds per license per system and all have an annually renewable support and update fee for continued support/updates. Android developers, on the other hand, have it exponentially worse. A lot of applications are relatively cheap, more often than not, under $1.00! Their users actually expect that the $0.99 they paid entitles them to a lifetime of priority support and upgrades; and, ready for it, access to the complete source code.

As for anybody who makes claims that Chainfire isn't a responsive developer, is full-of-it; in my humble opinion. SuperSU is ten-fold better and more reliable than its predecessor; especially, with the newer ROMs. He's doing a great job with it. But, that, is my own personal opinion though. To each their own...
[SuperSU] shaggyskunk:
Well said stew! For the grief that Chainfire gets from some, I'd guarantee (at least I would) that he'd rather refund the pittance he gets for his efforts, then be "accountable" for the rest of his life.

Sent from, The Eclectic Chair.
[SuperSU] shinobisoft:
I'm not an android developer but I am a windows developer. My code is my code unless I choose to release it as open source, period. No matter what the scenario is. Software developers are not required to provide an unlimited lifetime of updates for their products, tho most do. Most developers nowadays are hobbiests with regular full time jobs, I'm an electrician. Most of us will provide updates as we can not as the end user demands. My two cents...
[SuperSU] adell_:
Open source is one thing but security holes need to be fixed no matter it's closed source or open source.

I think you missed the point (or intentionally ignored it).
[SuperSU] vlt96:
We should stop OT about this!

Reasons why it should stay closed source:

1. Keep pro features pro (what stops you from taking the free version and remove pro requirement, then post it on a blog?)

2. People could find security loopholes this way, this could help devs, but also attackers! (This is why no game is open source)

So if an app has a paid version that is not standalone, don't ask for open source!

Sent from my LG-P500
[SuperSU] bsoplinger:
Google the phrase "security through obscurity" along with software to find out why this is a really bad idea. That said the other point remains: if they don't like it people are free to choose to use another product. Nobody is being forced to use SuperSU. Since I like the software I'll keep using it even if I disagree with the justification of obscurity.

Sent from my Sprint Evo View 4G (PG41200) using Xparent Purple Tapatalk 2
[SuperSU] G3-SCORPIO:
No one is forcing him to make the source code open. It is a help.

I wish that he would have reacted in the normal way, the message, when I ask him a question.

Each of you may have found little application in the phone that require ROOT. I have found about 200 applications. Of these, approximately 20 applications that require ROOT. And the program does not have time SuperSU do a good job. I have included a full logging in the program. And she began to run slowly. Put yourself 20-25 applications, which will ask ROOT and you will see the error of the program.

It is about responding to it, the questions of users. Usually, he says:

"I do not know" "How do I know"

I never answer. I always say: "Let's see," and begin to help always. I'm with everyone, and versed in detail.

And believe me, I have a right to say that my firmware is the best in Russia.

If you say that you have no problems with the program, you have little worth of software on the phone, buyout requires ROOT.

No matter how much he took money, much or little, it's his right. He chose this path. Once he has chosen this path, it must properly respond to people and try to at least help.

Here's how he replied. This is according to you, okay?

Although I have found myself that this is not an error SU. But the fact, however, I shall not ask him questions. I understood how he responds. He did not even ask the system log. He did not need it.

At this point I finished the discussion. I'll sort myself without any help. Thank you all.

I have attached screenshots of their applications and processes.
[SuperSU] hacknmtk:
Every time I update from the store it breaks root and I have to flash the zip in recovery to fix it. I guess I'm the only one this happens to. That's why I recommended to flash the zip rather than updating with the play store version.

If the play store version works for anyone, then by all means continue to update that way. Unfortunately it doesn't for me, and may not for others, which is why I offered the advice I did.

As a side note, Samsung is not the only phone that needs to use a systemless install, nor is it only on Marshmallow for other phones. Some stock Lollipop ROMs on other phones need a systemless install as well.
[SuperSU] egingell:
Nope. 5.0.1 is the latest and "greatest" official for the Sprint SGS4.

Sent from: SGS5 - MM 6.0.1 / SGS4 - LP 5.0.1
[SuperSU] grep_i:
The advise on it self was good but not in this situation where someone had no problem with updating through playstore.

Much worse was the guy does not even had a problem at all he just did not understand what he was reading in the app.

With my Nexus 5 the playstore update seems to fail to update the binaries so I always flash the binaries with flashfire and before flashfire through booting to custom recovery without flashing custom recovery on my device.

So it was better to advice him that he had no problem and everything is working as intended.
[SuperSU] hacknmtk:
I must have misunderstood what he was saying. For that I apologize. I try to help when I can, as others have helped me along the way. I didn't mean to mislead anyone, or cause any problems that didn't exist.
[SuperSU] KennyG123:
Thread cleaned of warez app discussion

Thanks
[SuperSU] sathiz1993:
I understand and I uninstalled
[SuperSU] complicazio:
[MENTION=631273]Chainfire[/MENTION]

The flash of the zip erase recovery-from-boot file from system folder?
[SuperSU] rohitshakti:
Can we just flash v.2.76 on Moto E condor which has V.2.46 on it and if yes, from where can we download the flashable file ?
[SuperSU] complicazio:
You can download zip in first post.
[SuperSU] egingell:
You're going to have to be *way* more specific.

Sent from: SGS5 - MM 6.0.1 / SGS4 - LP 5.0.1
[SuperSU] Technical:
All downloads are being blocked by Firefox as the connection seems not safe :crying:
[SuperSU] Sam Nakamura:
https://download.chainfire.eu/696/supersu/
[SuperSU] nicolap8:
[MENTION=631273]Chainfire[/MENTION]: I've a suggestion.

If the installation script doesn't find a /cache/.supersu or /data/.supersu file containing the selected options, it shows an information and stops.

(I left out /system.supersu because with recent phones his use can be a bad idea)

In this manner the user MUST read some kind of docs before been able to brick the phone :)

A request: at installation end it would be interesting to know (exactly) what the script done... Also this can help.

Thanks

N
[SuperSU] egingell:
I don't see how this solves his problem.

At any rate, the problem is likely with Firefox, not Chainfire's server.

Sent from: SGS5 - MM 6.0.1 / SGS4 - LP 5.0.1
[SuperSU] Sam Nakamura:
Of course it is a Firefox problem, and he could probably ignore it but it seems easier to me to use another website for download than xda thread..

Likely that the warning won't occur if downloaded from a different page..
[SuperSU] xCHAOSNCx:
Sorry [MENTION=631273]Chainfire[/MENTION] for the off topic but I seen this this morning and I couldn't think of any other developer that is higher on the Android totem pole than your greatness! So I thought I'd post this link for you to see and hopefully you or someone of your level will take a look for us and see if it may or may not contain a way of gaining legitimate root or maybe more for the galaxy s7 edge people. Again my most sincere apologies for the off topic in your thread sir but it was a chance to take. Thank you in advance.

---------- Post added at 02:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:39 PM ----------

Sorry [MENTION=631273]Chainfire[/MENTION] for the off topic but I seen this this morning and I couldn't think of any other developer that is higher on the Android totem pole than your greatness! So I thought I'd post this link for you to see and hopefully you or someone of your level will take a look for us and see if it may or may not contain a way of gaining legitimate root or maybe more for the galaxy s7 edge people. Again my most sincere apologies for the off topic in your thread sir but it was a chance to take. Thank you in advance.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=68095130
[SuperSU] grep_i:
Seems to work on my device with Firefox.

Maybe you don't know how Firefox works and you forgot to answer the question about the security incident certificate issue.
[SuperSU] Sam Nakamura:
I wasn't the one with a Firefox issue... I just answer to someone else's questions dude [emoji4] it's getting confused slowly..
[SuperSU] egingell:
By "another website" you mean the same website. All you did was link to the same website Chainfire links to in the OP.

Sent from: SGS5 - MM 6.0.1 / SGS4 - LP 5.0.1
[SuperSU] Sam Nakamura:
Oh, sh** my fault [emoji4] wasn't clear about that.. Sry I thought it's hosted on another source..
[SuperSU] seanhanrei2000:
supersu developer?
[SuperSU] Sam Nakamura:
Skipp to 1st post and find out yourself...
[SuperSU] Wasiq01:
iam not able to install supersu after download. My phone's rooted and uses king root. When I try to install supersu,king user starts crashing in a loop. But if I install supersu after removing king root,supersu is stocked on installing page, busy box is already installed.

Plzz help
[SuperSU] aniruddha007:
Try supersu me app
[SuperSU] Wasiq01:
Boss, it says update ur binary after installing supersu me app, it give tutorial that replace su file in system/xbin. Now the question is which. su file should be renamed to. Su before copying it to system/xbin?
[SuperSU] grep_i:
Please take this to private message or another thread this thread is about Supersu from the respected developer [MENTION=631273]Chainfire[/MENTION]