yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] lonestrider:
if patch like that exist for other devices, of course there's 'any' way to use the camera. It only depends on the developers.

Squadzone isn't working so hard in CM9 but CM7 is because CyanogenMod9 official kernel itself isn't fully done yet. Some devices still have camera issues. And I believe there's another issues.
[Eee Pad Transformer General] 1090t:
hello,

i heve the tf101 and i install on it custom rom.

how i back to the stock one from asus ?
[Eee Pad Transformer General] Bobsinclair25:
Try reading here

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1494230
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Pavito:
I currently have the most up to date SIM card for AT&T, I am on the 4G LTE plan, my phone spec's say it should work, but the best I can get is H+ service. My area in San Diego has LTE speeds. Does anyone know how to get this phone to work on the LTE network. AT&T tells me it won't because I didn't buy it from them.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Zamboney:
The N7000 doesn't have LTE.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rgarjr:
Only HSPA+ on the Int Note
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] joshnichols189:
As noted.. you will only get LTE on the Note that comes directly from AT&T.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Pavito:
I thought the phone did have LTE...Oh well. Thanks for the reply, I appreciate it.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Pavito:
I thought only the processor changed, not the guts of the phone... that sucks!!!! Regardless, the international version of the phone is far superior than the one offered by AT&T. I don't have all the baggage to contend with :-)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Pavito:
:confused: I'm confused :confused:.

I found these specs for the GT-N7000:

Also known as Samsung GT-N7000, Samsung I9220

General	2G Network	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900

3G Network	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100

4G Network	LTE 700 (region specific)

Then I searched to see what band or frequency AT&T uses for LTE and found it is LTE 700. My region has it. Therefore, my phone is capable and there must be a setting to get the phone to talk to the network. My plan has been changed and I have the newest SIM card installed. There has to be a away :cool: .
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] joyo22:
Dude, Exynos chipset does not support LTE. N700 does not have LTE support. You'd have to buy an AT&T version to make LTE work.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Zamboney:
+1 that's why they had to drop the far faster exynos for the slowdragon on att.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] joshnichols189:
See how it says "region specific"? This is not an LTE phone in Europe. This is not an LTE phone period. The AT&T Note has LTE, and that was tacked onto the Note's list of frequencies because the AT&T Note can get it. Not because yours can.

Your phone is not capable of LTE. It doesn't matter what sim card you use, what region you're in, or if you practice black magic.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DJsCrIBbLe:
I think hebis confused because the Korean lte note?

Which has exynos right
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mustang2012:
Note has to have a specific hardware to cater for a LTE signal and international N7000 don;t have it... This is the reason why every galaxy note in korea and AT&T's galaxy note is equipped with snapdragon processor and not with exynos chipset...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mister_Mxyzptlk:
I love answering this question over and over again! Exynos 4210 = no LTE. Snapdragon S3 = LTE.

As far as the CPU vs guts question goes, modern phones don't use separate CPU, GPU, RAM, etc. They use an SoC (System on a chip) which combines these elements into one module. Exynos is the name of the SoC; not the CPU.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Zamboney:
So what's the name of the CPU?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mister_Mxyzptlk:
The CPU is a dual-core ARM Cortex A9. I have no idea what Samsung calls it.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TRF-Inferno:
The listed specifications from GSMArena is off, there is a Galaxy Note LTE prior to AT&T's, but it is specific to South Korean market and had the model number SHV-E160. This is the same one that AT&t sells in the U.S. now as the SGH-I717 with the Snapdragon processor.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Blue1k:
Correct. Exonys chip set does not support LTE. The Korean model supported lte but not the correct band for america and it has a snapdragon chipset.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] joshnichols189:
Samsung used to call it Hummingbird if I'm not mistaken..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Diesel1968:
i9220

Also the i9220 the Chinese version of the note is LTE. It was the first to be LTE and then AT&T's version came out so if he had a i9220 he could use LTE on it.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] joshnichols189:
But he doesn't..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Zamboney:
I seriously doubt that. We wouldn't be able to use the i9220 kernel for ics then as it couldn't be exynos based.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] joshnichols189:
The KOREAN version was the first to be LTE.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Zamboney:
Really stupid of Samsung to have completely different hardware with the same name. Seems the confusion is neverending.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Babydollll:
The Hummingbird is a single core CPU in the NEXUS S. I know because I own one.

Wasn't me!! I didn't do it!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] squiggly whale:
how abt malaysian model

Malaysia's model of the note 1 claims to have 4g LTE but i can't find the option to enable it (there's isn't at&t here).
[LG Optimus 2x] PhilK5:
I sort of went down the rooting route due to everyone saying it was a MUST - even though the LG ran well, everything worked well and battery life was OK if not groundbreaking. So I was kind of half-hearted to start with.

Well, after 2 days of having to keep re-romming after this didn't work and that didn't work (Bluetooth in particular) I just can't get MIUI to see the 16gb card as the 16gb it is, it shows as 5. Now I had read this before. But that the LG software had this problem not the rooted stock. I even tried to go back to LG's original - It didn't work. The download on here (UK version of original Optimus 2x) doesn't install. Says "aborted" - this after horrendously slow download speeds. Keeps saying it's part of a multi-pack on my PC. Put them both on, but....

Anyways. The 16gb card. Ive tried another 16gb card with the same end result.

Can anyone PLEASE help me. Ive got no help on the MIUI site, and just lost. I tried to install Navfree and another navigation prog (Navfree UK maps don't download properly - keeps demanding more and more downloads. Ridiculously so - had to be uninstalled) tried another one, and it said it needed a 750mb download and there wasn't enough room - there was a MOUNTAIN of room. But its showing as 5. (Even there, theres not close to 5gb used)

Can anyone PLEASE help ?

All Ive got so far asking on half a dozen sites, is silence so far in 4 days
[LG Optimus 2x] silentmelodies:
I doubt what is 'seen' as 5 gb by your phone is your SD card. I haven't ever heard of such problems. Big chances are, which often happens, that you're mistaking the internal memory as the sd card.

Stock MIUI mounts the internal and external cards the same way as stock LG ROM, but there could be a chance you used a swap mount mod without knowing.
[LG Optimus 2x] crankyboy:
I actually wanted to laugh, here i upload a file just for you :)

Here is the link for the sd mod.

http://www.box.com/s/7pl04u9onk76d80yb5tl

Credits goes too this thread : http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1263311
[LG Optimus 2x] spica1234:
Lol nice heading of miui. 16/miui = 5 :p kidding, never mind:)
[LG Optimus 2x] PhilK5:
Excellent !!!!!

You sir, are a gentleman and a scholar. It's solved my irritating problem and thats an understatement - now I have a proper 16gb sd micro in and all the room that invokes ! :D:D:D:D
[LG Optimus 2x] PhilK5:
And where was that ? Not in the heading. Check again.
[LG Optimus 2x] crankyboy:
Click the _______ button. (Fill in the blanks) Hint*"when somebody did a favour you should ?":
[LG Optimus 2x] eraldo:
You might have fake memory, memory thats been hacked to look like it has more than it does....the chinese do stupid s**t like that. Sometimes when the card is formatted the true memory capacity is revealed.
[LG Optimus 2x] crankyboy:
He is using MIUI ROM

Miui only uses the internel sd card ~~
[LG Optimus 2x] PhilK5:
Er.....I checked, and yes, a big thanks given to you for your help. Quite profuse, actually. Ive just noticed the "thanks" button - but you could have done it with a LOT more grace.

Clearly, being thanked profusely didn't do it for you ? :D

Hard man to please.

I'll click the button then that I missed until er.....reminded of it a little too grumpily for me - hopefully that'll tick the box for you.:rolleyes:

Still, while being a little miffed at the attitude, Im still very grateful for your help, for all that.
[XPERIA X8 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mmacharya:
After installtion of ROM (without installing other APPS for ROM) mobile network was working fine and I was able to make/receive calls. I used it for couple of hrs, the only thing I noticed that I was not able to turn the WIFI on I thought this could be because of other apps so I installed other apps. Immediately after installing other apps network is gone even if I try to search network manually it says "Error while serching network" and still I can not turn my WIFI on. Any one else having same problem?

I reinstalled ROM to check this and again same problem. No network & No WIFI.
[XPERIA X8 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Vicky26:
About wifi, it's said in the first post that it only works with static ip, although there's a fix for that, so i used it and my wifi is excellent now.

About the network, i really can't help you but mine is fine...Have you tried to wipe data before installing the rom again?
[XPERIA X8 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] didkoslawow:
This ROM need nAa11 kernel to work ot of the box! Why you need alf's kernel?
[XPERIA X8 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mmacharya:
Yes I did. Regarding WIFI, my problem is that I can not switch on the WIFI thus unable to fix wifi solution

Yes I know.... but in developer's thread I found many people are using alfs without any problem so used this one. Just now I tried flashing nAa11 trough 1st post but unfortunately flash tool is not showing this file in available kernel list??????
[XPERIA X8 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mmacharya:
problem solved with nAa 11 and reinstallation without wipe:)
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dakki12345:
im not pretty sure about this but i read some things about this 4.0.5 and it was said it was going to be released on i9000

4.0.5 said to be has a BIG performance fix..

i got this news from this link

http://www.androiddigit.com/samsung-galaxy-nexus-and-nexus-s-to-get-android-4-0-5-ics-in-march/
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] prottotype:
Galaxy Nexus and Nexus S

The news link clearly states only the galaxy nexus and nexus S. Plus it was abundantly made clear in older news posts around the net that the i9000 is not getting ICS and neither will it get the rumored Value pack. As I too am a i9000 user, it kinda sucks to know this :( :mad:
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dakki12345:
i know samsung said something like that...

but.. dude i think theres a big possibility due to this

Performance FIX thing.. because thats the only one stopping from galaxy S to ICS is Performance..
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ichijoe:
I'm no great shake on what appears to me to be French, but...

1) Your Article was written for the Nexus and Nexus S and not for the GT-I900Xx (a.k.a the Galaxy S)

2) Where the Article in question even mentions the Galaxy S (Some Table taken from a presumably French source), states quite clearly (even to a non French speaker like myself that the Galaxy S is to only get Android 2.3.6 (Presumably the Value Pack Version), release date February 2012 to be released over Kies.

To indirectly quote your Source it was a table of Official Updates for their current line of Phones.

So I fail to see where you misread this Article into thinking that the Galaxy S was somehow going to get an ICS Update, when Samsung have up to this point stressed that they would not, or could not officially update the GT-I900Xx do to whatever limitations between Touchwiz 3.0 and ICS.

**Edit** What Samsung we're not even gonna get the Value Pack now?

/r/ Sauce kthnxbye!
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kunjar:
No chance! Wishful thinking at best. SGS is useless with its 512mb RAM. Either that or the software engineers at Samsung can only compile bloat. The latest iOS seems to function perfectly on iphone4 though. Split between whether i should wait for SGS3 or grab the next iphone and jailbreak the hell outta it. Hmm decisions decisions...
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] henmy168:
android 5 will performance soon ,seach the news...
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] elburo:
U really think galaxy s1 will get Android 5?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Aronka:
common guys...what makes you thinking that we'll get android 5?

Samsung will forget our phone, if he doesn't yet.... :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] laehtis:
there's ported sgs2 ics firmware for sgs, it's on pre alpha state but its working very good, i'm using it right now:)

sgs has enough power to ics to work fine
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JuanGomez:
Samsung might forget us, but XDA devs won't! And if the unofficial ICS builds are any indication, our phone sure is powerful enough to handle ICS.

It sure does suck that we're not getting official ICS, but the awesome community here has infinitely improved my experience, so for that I'm glad and grateful.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Hoppahoppa:
Like Samsung is going to go trough the trouble of making an ICS version for a phone that is almost two years old.

I'd rather have them focus on creating top-notch software for my next phone..... The SGSIII......
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] tytung2020:
I am using it now, although it may have a lot of UI effects, but amazingly all the effects are buttery smooth, no lags at all on my Note. It is easily the smoothest launcher I ever used (I have Go, ADW and the stock Touchwhiz).

However the price is high, and a few functions still not available now, but I'm sure they will be added in future updated (they need cash urgently to keep the project alive, I think)

When this is fully done, it will be the best launcher on the market ^^

https://market.android.com/details?id=com.tsf.shell#?t=W251bGwsMSwyLDIxMiwiY29tLnRzZi5zaGVsbCJd
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] Vitaminen:
I was looking forward to it but the price tag put me off and if u take a screen shot and zoom in on the icons u will notice that the icons are lower resolution then for example stock launcher.

And if you for example take and place the Box widget on both TSF shell and on the TW home screen u will se that even the widget have some kind of lesser image quality on the TSF home screen. I have no idea why, But the white backgroud isnt as sharp and detailed on the TSF launcher compare to TW. And on the top blue color on the widget u can see stripes in the color and in TW there are no stripes. I dont know if it has something to do with color depth or something.

This occur on version 1.2
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] astrodemoniac:
There is a thread about it already with plenty of feedback from all the peeps that have trying it :)

xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1388075&page=2
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] zylor:
Complete waste of money

/close
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] Arkymedes:
Strange, it says that my device is incompatible.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] benzso63:
I installed it on mine yesterday. I must say this is the best launcher I have ever seen and just amazingly "smooth". I mean no lag at all. I tried tons of launchers on my note but nothing come close to these. So powerful! Rotate icons anywhere, the sticky note is also bad ass. Flexible! I captured a short clip last night while I was playing with it. Still trying to figure some other features.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SvAhWk_3yU
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] jamafr001:
it proves Thanks
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] avetny:
I download for free from google :P

Guys this launcher using 20 mb ram, its same like stock. After 20 min play I dont want to comeback to touch wiz Launcher at all.

Fast, smooth and so "smart"
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] yohanpra:
I thought nothing could be pricier than spb shell 3d , lol, guess I was wrong
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] foxmeister:
In that case, don't be a thief any go buy it!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] TheMathMan:
Not sure about the smoothness of the app tray graphics. Looks a bit blurry like its being scaled up.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] smackdownn:
the biggest problem for me is..after using all the launchers swiping left and right on homescreen to go to next screen, its so irritating in this launcher we cant swype like that instead its giving some multi selection option which annoys me the most!!!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] avetny:
In that case you can go and cry on moms shoulder.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] [David]:
mHauHauHauHauHau LOL :D

Anyway I must ask if is it REALLY (as someone said) the best one (instead of ADW EX and SBP) or NOT???? Please be honest

Sent from my Galaxy Note with DarkyROM 3.3
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] avetny:
Send me your email.

U will see ;-)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] GAME ON:
+1 and LOL for this xDDDDDD

love this new home launcher..thumb ups!! :D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] smackdownn:
there are no settings for the launcher?

i cant see any!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] easycure1974:
It totally sucks. Even though I got it free it was uninstalled in minutes. It is nothing more than a tech demo in current state. After some updates it might be worth to use
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] easycure1974:
There are no settings yet, not many features in this overpriced launcher
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] jusutus:
Looks rubbish and costs too much.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] iceangel1980:
it's still in beta state and shouldn't be sold right now, it has potential but it's just not ready

no swiping screens, most options from demo not working yet, no way to resize widgets

truth to be told it's smooth, but I will wait for further updates

tsf team deleted or lost a huge portion of negative comments on their page, not the best marketing practice
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] foxmeister:
Wow. So mature!

Pathetic!

Warez is for losers.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] ufk:
not compatible with my phone?!

Hello. I purchased spb shell 3d and i'd love to purchase this if it really works good. it's expensive but if it's a good launcher it worth the money.

when I try to install this launcher from the market it says that it's not compatible with my device.

I have Galaxy Note GT-N7000 with the chinese ICS rom.

any ideas ?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] iceangel1980:
its not working on ics
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] astrodemoniac:
Working fine on mine. MIDNOTE 2.0 ICS :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] notegalaxy:
I'm trying it out. Looks alright. Nice and ssnappy. Missing basic functions though that go launcher has covered. Wouldn't spend the cash just yet people
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] jeromepearce:
Not only do I disagree with your flagrant disregard for copyright, being a software developer myself is no small part of that, but I believe you are violating forum rules:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] Bigmille:
Uninstalled after 6 minutes, like others have said, it is too expensive for the limited features compared against much cheaper apps like Launcher Pro and ADW Launcher. Even free GO launcher is a better product than this.

Message to the developers:

You are not Apple, you cannot get away with charging top $ for a beta product!

If the price was £3/$5, I'd have kept the app for future improvements.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] jeromepearce:
Fully agree. Perhaps they will see the light, perhaps not....
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] Scrubb:
I tried it out last nite. it is very smooth, crystal clear, and the widget animations are pretty cool (except for the music widget didn't work for some reason) there's a lot of functionality missing. I am just too comfortable with GO Launcher. I don't think I can go without my GOwidgets. Needless to say...it was uninstalled within an hour. It's got a long way to go before its actually worth $17.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] MrDSL:
The fact that the app they offer for $17 bucs doesnt even have the features they show in the video is enough reason not to buy it..

its false advertising to say the least and I wish Google didnt allow stuff like that.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] kuttyjoe:
I bought this launcher and used it like 1 day before going back to a more flexible launcher. It's "visually" impressive, but the first sign of trouble is that it doesn't even have settings that can be edited. It's downhill from there. You can't adjust the size of widgets. You can't use live wallpaper. There are like 5 or 6 pages I think, but you can't remove any of them. I only intended to use 2 but that leaves 4 blank pages. With an ordinary launcher, it's very fast to simply swipe left or right to switch pages. You take that for granted until something like this. With this one, getting from one page to another is sort of a chore and is accident prone. LOL You hold your finger on the button in the bottom left corner and it opens up the 6 pages (I only wanted 2 visible), then you slide your finger over to the page you want while 4 out of 10 times, you land on the wrong page. It's not the kind of problem I want to have just going from one page to another. Also, even though the whole interface is butter smooth, there's a problem with that button in the lower left corner. Sometimes you place your finger on it and nothing happens for at least 2 seconds. That happens constantly. Also, the weather app opened and showed that I was in a location I'd never heard of. And remember, there's no settings panel to be found There's an icon in the "drawer" for the launcher, but if you tap it, it doesn't do anything. Surprisingly, this launcher has turned out to be the worst launcher I've ever tried when I thought it was going to be the best one ever.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] Souai:
randomly i've bought both.

have you played around with it for longer than 2 minutes? most of the features are there.

personally, im kinda inbetween shell3d and this launcher. this launcher feels smoother and unlike shell3d, this launcher does not limit you to a 4x4 grid. but shell3d has a lot more useful widgets, like a calendar widget page, weather widget page, etc. TSF shell doesnt include too many widgets, so you may find yourself looking towards the market for free widgets to fill in the gaps. i kinda like the smoothness of the UI and some of the animations are quite attractive.

they recently added the ability to adjust screen density into version 1.3. the setting is kinda inverted though, lower number = higher pixel density. it fixes most of the problems, but it does condense the app drawer a bit.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Themes and Apps] MrDSL:
why would i? it doesnt have all the features that they show in the video period..thats false advertising..maybe that acceptable to you but not to me..especially at $17 bucs!!