yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] GalaxySwifi4.0:
I flashed the update of CM7, but there was a problem (the same which are mentionned in the thread)

So I flashed the official ROM and then R3. It worked, then I flashed R4, and after 30 minutes wainting in "nand writing" I stopped Odin, and I flash again R3.

But I don't like the theme, so I try to restore my backup but I have a bootloop, I try to flash original CM7, Alpha 1.1 and Beta2 of CM7, same thing, bootloop.

Now you've just realise R5 with an ICS theme, but when I try to flash it it always fails.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Alpine725:
Is your Odin output similar to mine?
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] jpearn:
Are you extracting the Gziped file ??
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Alpine725:
I extracted the tar from the gz file with WinZIP...Odin wouldnt recognize it as a gz.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] NightHawk877:
Here is what I am getting for mine.

<ID:0/005> File analysis..

<ID:0/005> SetupConnection..

<ID:0/005> Initialzation..

<ID:0/005> Get PIT for mapping..

<ID:0/005> Firmware update start..

<ID:0/005> Klassic_R5_USA.tar

<ID:0/005> NAND Write Start!!

<ID:0/005>

<ID:0/005> Complete(Write) operation failed.

<OSM> All threads completed. (succeed 0 / failed 1)
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Alpine725:
Seems to be the same thing I am getting. Hopefully someone on here will know what we can do to fix it.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] axvk97:
I successfully flashed R5, i found some problems:

-I don't have my lockscreen for some odd reason, so when i push the unlock button it just goes to the app I was on prior to locking it.

-Whenever I reboot com.android.settings Auto Close box pops up.

-My "Home" button doesn't work.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] zaclimon:
Try to flash it using heimdall. It's working for me.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] NightHawk877:
How did you get it to flash with Odin or did you use Heimdall?
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] klin1344:
Sorry for the hiccups guys for now use heimdall but Ill create a correctly tar'd version for windows and re upload it.

Sent using Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] NightHawk877:
Does anyone have a Heimdall package of this ROM for me to use?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Accessories] p51d007:
Kind of hard to order something that costs 2-4 times the price just to ship it.

http://www.tvc-mall.com/details/Samsung-Galaxy-Note-I9220-GT-N7000-Slide-Case-with-Swivel-Belt-Clip-Holster-Stand-MHC-I9220-66/
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Accessories] pony13ca:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260961000978&ssPageName=ADME:X:RTQ:US:1123

Found this on Ebay. Will take about 2 weeks to get to you though.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Accessories] zagitariuz:
Im sorry to post it here, but how about this case. I cant understand the website since its in korean.

http://www.ifacemall.com/shop/shopdetail.html?branduid=453630&xcode=010&mcode=001&scode=&type=X&search=&sort=order
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Accessories] lulcho:
use google translate
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Accessories] p51d007:
Ordered...will let everyone know how it works out. For 10 bucks

SHIPPED, even if it is a dud, not out much.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Accessories] pony13ca:
I ordered one also. I saw this case but for an iphone on the weekend. It looked good! For $10 what have we got to lose?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Accessories] DJsCrIBbLe:
Ten bucks this is what a lot have been wanting for in the holster thread . Will order 2

Sent from my Ice Creamy Galaxy NOTE
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Accessories] p51d007:
Yep, only 10 bucks.

Rumor has it Otterbox might have note ready cases in March....

I had the defender on my streak, so I might just as well get one

for the note if/when they come out with one.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Accessories] DJsCrIBbLe:
Too bulky for me but this case looks great. Just ordered. Hope its nice. The eBay ad has link to YouTube video and it looks solid!

Sent from my Ice Creamy Galaxy NOTE
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Accessories] wilson.cheah:
Hope to see a review on this mate!

Nice purchase u got here! :D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Accessories] DJsCrIBbLe:
Not a review but click the eBay link and the seller includes a video overview and it looks like a solid unit!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Accessories] pony13ca:
Got mine today. It is a perfect fit! It is far less bulky than I thought. The stand works great! Great buy for $10!! Very happy with it!! What you see in the youtube video is what you get!!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Accessories] DJsCrIBbLe:
Awesome! That's what i wanna hear. Seidio started shipping they're active case holster but it's 50 bucks so i was hoping this thing was nice.

Pic possibly?

Also what was your order date and how long did it take to come? I think i order a day or 2 after you so now I'm excited! :D
[HTC Rezound] skatingrocker17:
I made the mistake of choosing clockwork recovery for my Rezound only to find out that when the phone dies, YOU CAN'T CHARGE IT.

So now I'm in fast boot (I don't know if the phone is charging or not), but I'm trying to figure out if I can change the phones battery percentage. Right now, I can't flash a different recovery because it fails because my battery is too low. Well I can't charge it if I can't change the recovery and I have no other way to charge the battery.

Can this be done with ADB? Is there some sort of work around?

Thanks
[HTC Rezound] EmerikL:
Try fastboot reboot or adb reboot. I can't remember which command, but that should get you back to having the phone up and charging.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] honighamster:
I have CWM installed and use the KRAKD Rom, but my card broke.

I want to flash the ICS version now, but is there a way to do this without the SDCard.

I have a B70 device so NVFlash doesnt work yet( as far as i know).

Thanks for help
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] baseballfanz:
Get you the Team Rouge's CWM version. It work with internal storage.

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=22359727&postcount=218
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] horndroid:
I have a b70 and it works with nvflash
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] baseballfanz:
Some B7O have SBKv1 (NVFlash compatible) and some have SBK v2 (NOT compatible with NVFlash)
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] RaverX3X:
I just wanted to quell some of the confusion Reguarding Topics , What goes into the Dev section, General Section Q N A etc.

Development section,

Roms Tweaks Kernels

What the dev's truly want in there threads is this Bug Tracking Logcat's (minus your personal info Please prune the logcat or expunge your personal info and Imei number if its listed)

These threads are For development.

General section pretty much anything goes normally its a off topic discussion thread.

Q N A section

This is where Ultimately And the mods do try there best to Migrate posts to this.

This Sub fourm is what its actually intended for Simple questions like Do i need to flash this or wipe that what are the mounts so on so forth those do not belong in the Dev threads..

Also most Mods normally stick guides in there How to use a rom kitchen so on so forth..

Themes sub fourm

As applicable questions regarding how to theme a rom or how to modify status bars etc..

Normally also includes other peoples themes so on so forth etc...

I know this is just a simple synapse as to the general layout and i am in no means the mod of the sgs4g section of xda. But Generally thats what the fourm layout is for..
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] thomas.raines:
@Raver

+1
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jdubb1106:
+1 raver

i remem once upon a time i made a thread like this and got my ass flamed, i agree with you 100% im just saying be prepared to get flamed by the assholes
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] eollie:
The only thing I see missing is a guide to people creating stuff in the Dev section. Like starting a q&a thread once you release a [dev][rom][tweak] or the likes. Making sure its linked in the op of your thread.

I mention this because people are more likely to post questions in a q&a thread started by the dev then little billy that has 3 posts and never posts again. Plus if a dev starts it people will think since he started it he is monitoring it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] loudog3114:
So... I have been struggling to get rid of home screen lag on this device. I am now down to about 5 Widgets and only 2 home screens populated and I still have to consistently wait for the home screen to populate. Sometimes it takes 6-7 seconds, which Is really annoying. Anyway I downloaded memory booster to keep the ram cleaned up, and it indicates that I only have 768mb, not the advertised 1gb. On my xyboard it indicates the correct amount... did I get a bad device or has anyone else noticed this too? In my experience 768 just isn't enough to get a snappy experience in ics so I am pretty worried about this.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] sdimezq8:
I think we may only have 768MB but I cannot find any proof of it, and no one else has been able to provide any proof...

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1506603&highlight=1gb

---------- Post added at 06:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:14 PM ----------

The Samsung Captivate only has 384MB of real system RAM. NOT the 512MB it was said to have.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Rocket42:
.....and the Infuse had 452 Avail......
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] spiritcrusher33:
My unlocked note has 800mb free while my att note has 768mb free..not to mention my unlocked note gets way better battery life and doesn't lag. I wanted to stay with the att version but too many issues. Unlike my skyrocket which was flawless. Maybe att needs to push out an update for the note to smooth it out.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] loudog3114:
That's a big let down... great that att took an awesome device and completely gimped it. Sigh.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] flex3269:
Well it seems that the note does have 1gb of ram but 300mb of that is inactive?? How do we activate it!!!! lol If you download and install quadrant and look at the information tab all the way at the bottom it has ram information and this is what it says. if it really is inactive im not happy because we need all the ram we can get, i sure it would help out with the lag.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ekerbuddyeker:
I think you need to hard reset your device. I am using the stock launcher and have no lag whatsoever. Yes it is 768mb but that's enough. I froze all my non needed apps BTW.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] mintu123:
The missing ram is used by the system core.u can fix the lag by using a cpu app and set min speed to 500mhz at boot.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] sdimezq8:
Where is the proof though?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jimmer411:
We have 1gb. My ateix showed the same thing
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] zas311:
256K is used as video ram and system stuffs. All smat phones are using a portion of the ram for system. Galaxy S has 512K ram but only 377K is used for apps.

Edit: K->M
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] loudog3114:
I think odds are that 256mb is being used by the gpu. There is no such thing as the kernal 'hiding' ram. Unfortunate thought that the gpu doesnt have its own discrete memory.

I have a sensation with the revolution HD rom. In gingerbread it was absolutely the fastest GUI I have ever used on an android device. In ICS, though, its slower. 768mb of ram just isnt enough to take advantage of android. Again, sigh.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] loudog3114:
I, also, have frozen more apps than I have seen anyone else post yet. Still consistently sitting at about 560-600mb used.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] SGS2X:
It does have 1gb of RAM but the OS uses the other 200-something. Even my skyrocket and hercules had the same amount. if you use CM then it frees up some more space. Also, how is 700mb+ ram not enough? o-o I've NEVER seen mine go over 550 used out of the total available, no matter how many apps I'm running. I also read that in Android/Linux, the ram that isn't used is useless so the more ram it uses the better (I may be wrong on that?)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] sdimezq8:
Not to jack this thread; but really where is the proof?! Just because someone says it does, does not mean it does... I do not know if it does or does not have 1GB of RAM but I think we all want to know...

Here is some proof that the Samsung Captivate really only has 384MB of traditional RAM...

http://sean-the-electrofreak.blogspot.com/2010/12/mystery-solved-how-samsung-pulls-off.html

I have been looking for something like this regarding the Note...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rignfool:
According to what I have read... the way linux/android uses memory is nothing like windows... as long as there is enough to run the program... everything is fine... not like in windows where things run better with more memory free...

My guess on your lag is that you have something in the background eating up cpu cycles...

Maybe watchdog might give you some more information?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] drblack2013:
I have zero lag with TW launcher, but considerable lag with launcher pro plus.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] joshnichols189:
The Galaxy Nexus reports 768mb of RAM, and it runs ICS just fine.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] HarmonyFlame:
This guy here is correct. In android the more RAM won't speed up performance of the OS. Android is not designed like windows. Killing apps will increase battery life, but not performance.

The note DOES have 1gb or ram. A portion of it is inactive UNTIL the point you use up all your available 732mb of RAM (which is no easy task considering how the OS closes inactive apps in exchange for another). This is probably done so that the OS is not wasting hardware resources for no reason.

So in all, RAM itself is not the reason your phone has performance issues. Their may be a particular app causing a cpu problem. I would also consider maybe using a higher clock speed maybe? Although I have not done so myself and my note runs great.

Sent from the best mobile device ever --Samsung Galaxy Note
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] SGS2X:
Are you talking about lag during screen transitions and scrolling? if so, I think that's a problem with the 2d drivers for the GPU. The Hercules has the same problem but the Skyrocket ROMs/Kernels fix that issue to an extent. When ICS comes out, it will be nonexistent because of hardware acceleration (hopefully). I tried xboarder's ICS rom and the lag is completely gone even though he hasn't fixed the hardware acceleration yet

If it's some other type of lag, check Task Manager to see if theres an app that eating too much RAM. If it still happens try flashing a new rom and re downloading the apps from scratch
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] hauj0bb:
Lol yeah, the ATT GNote is totally gimped! :rolleyes:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Made2Last:
The only thing this phone has versus the international is some ****ty apps and a qualcomm processor because of LTE.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] imitenotbecrazy:
So return it and leave?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Made2Last:
I wasn't saying that as a negative. The processor is more than adequate and the apps will be removed when the dev community gets going.

I don't really understand how what i said was bad, just remarking on the very small difference between at&t and international version.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] loudog3114:
Yes, anything can run ICS 'fine'. However, when I start loading up active apps that I like to use (folder organizer, exchange email, foldersync, dogcatcher, etc etc) most devices lag considerably. Which is fine, if there is no alternative... but pick up a wp7 device and you'll never tollerate lag again. My sensation ran everything I could throw at it, and then some, with the gingerbread rom I had loaded up. Tough having spent 300 bucks and taking a significant step back from that. Obviously once devs get going that wont be an issue, but its surprising that even with SUCH a hardware advantage they still ship these devices running this badly.

The biggest bother to me is waiting for the home screen to populate again after closing an app or, sometimes, unlocking. It sometimes takes almost 10 seconds to do so and I need the device to be 100% snappy or I just want to throw it out a window. It seems when I get to about 550mb used everything cached for the home screen is removed from ram, which I believe wouldn't be an issue with more memory and/or better memory management.

The rom on the att note is pretty bad, I think most would agree. Unless you are just putting in a couple pages of icons and have nothing running in the background, which kind of defeats the purpose of android anyway...?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] welchertc:
I don't see the point of having 7 homescreens full of apps. That's what the app drawer is for. If you have only enough screens for your Widgets and a few necessary apps, I'm sure they would repopulate a lot faster.

As to having tons of apps open, android foes a good job of keeping your active ones open and closing dormant ones. As others have said, the way ram works on android allows many apps to be open without a drawback in responsiveness. My guess is that it's definitely not android screwing you over, or your phone not having enough ram, rather, you probably have a rogue app that is stressing the CPU, while not completely using your ram. A good app doing its job at multitasking will stay in a frozen state, not using CPU cycles. Yes, it will take up ram, but it wont affect your responsiveness. The multitasking part is it staying frozen. So when you open it again it resumes where you left off.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] loudog3114:
Throughout this process I have narrowed it down to 3 screens. I definitely _can_ fill up all 7 with useful widgets, but that brings this thing to a complete crawl... so i narrowed it down. I am still having considerable home screen lag, even after running the supercharger script. SO, I am going to flash the one custom rom that is up right now, give that a shot... and if it still sucks, this bad boy is going right back to ATT.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] hauj0bb:
I think most would disagree, there's a handful of reviews claiming that the ATT GNote 'feels' snappier than the Intl. version. Seems to me like you're just here to troll.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] joshnichols189:
He's trolling because he doesn't agree with "a handful of reviews"??

I have an international note but played with some at&t ones at Best Buy. One seemed just as fast as mine but the either was extremely bogged down. The slower one must have had some sort of app taking up CPU cycles because like I said, one of them was snappy as can be.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Eric-1987:
My note is running perfect and fast no lag at all even when I leave a game running to send a text or email.

Sent from my 1.8GHz Galaxy Note
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] CyberGhos:
The "more ram it sues the better" is not correct bro. If you observe you will see. When more RAM is used, your phone runs like crap and more crashes occur.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] loudog3114:
Any stock phone will feel snappy. Its when you get it configured like you _need_ it when it matters, and this thing has fallen very short thus far, for me.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Eric-1987:
Fall short? Its just you. I can't get this thing to lag at all.

Sent from my 1.8GHz Galaxy Note
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] welchertc:
Bro, you are not fully correct either. What you, bro, are describing, is the way windows treats RAM. On windows, the more RAM you have available, the faster your system runs. However, android is different. The amount of RAM open does not affect the speed or snapiness. So long as you have more RAM open, you can theoretically open more programs without a negative effect on speed. Yes, having more apps open does take up more RAM, but what slows down your phone is the extra CPU cycles from those apps putting strain on your processor, not the allocation of RAM. The system always has that 200 and some MB of RAM to itself so it's never an issue of RAM. If there is not enough rAM to run another process, the android task manager closes the least active app, therefore effectively never allowing a lack of RAM to slow the system down. Bro.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] loudog3114:
Just out of curiosity, what do you run? Personally, just for widgets, I use folder organizer, a calendar, evernote, spotify, pandora, dogcatcher, google music, various power control plus widgets, seesmic, data counter, etc (the list goes on). I had all these going on my sensation with no redraws or lag. Not the same story here, unfortunately. I have had to remove all of them at this point, minus a calendar, to get this thing to never redraw.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jpeg42:
You posted in the dev section that the TPC ROM seemed to alleviate this issue for you. Is that not the case anymore?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] loudog3114:
Well... I flashed the rom, and tried it without wiping. Same issues (not surprised, most custom roms require a wipe anyway), so I cleared the cache... same issues. Then, I wiped. I am customizing again, very slowly. So far so good.. with my calendar widget, folder organizer, and a few background apps going. Nowhere near where I was though, so we will see.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] troyolson92:
I removed the NOTE memo widget grim home screen. Holy crap what a difference, phone us super snappy now!!!! I also removed nearly all Samsung and att apps. Touch wiz is gone!!! Use super charger v8 and I'm smoking fast now!!!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] andrawer:
Yes he is.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] loudog3114:
I ran the supercharger script with the 1000hp script and honestly didnt notice a difference, when I was having these issues.

How did you go about remove the att apps and touchwiz? Titanium? Are you using the stock android launcher now or something else?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] loudog3114:
Just FYI, I just tried adw... very stuttery on home screen scrolling and adding some TW widgets to various pages made it pretty useless.

My theory, at this point, is that the TW widgets are AWFUL and/or trying to use some 3d acceleration that doesnt work... as they brought adw to its knees. I still have no tw widgets on my stock launcher, and it is still running smooth. Up to about 10 widgets now on 2 pages, including 5-6 folder organizer items.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] codecthelios:
graphics

Isn't the graphics using some of the ram? There's less ram on the at&t version because the graphics chip in that soc needs more ram. Tho the unlocked onehas the better performing processor, The graphics are just a little less powerful. Slightly better graphics needs slightly more memory.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Eric-1987:
I dont think thats true.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] codecthelios:
well in the att captivate forums there was a similar discussion and that was their conclusions. Just a theory
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] troyolson92:
Sorry just checked back.

I use go launcher, used titanium to removed a ton if crap including touch wiz. Use titanium to clean dalvik cache. Make backups of everything you remove first.
[HTC Flyer, EVO View 4G] readable:
I am losing my association to my programs. For example in gmail, when I click on a link it just sits there and doesn't go to my Internet. Even when I go to dropbox to open a file, it downloads the file but will not goto the program to open the file.

Any suggestions would be great.
[HTC Flyer, EVO View 4G] TSGM:
I too often have the same problem; it's not an issue of the wrong program launching, but that the menu, which typically pops up asking you for which program you'd like to use does not appear whatsoever. It does.not seem to be a problem with file association.

Have you tried to reboot your Flyer? In some cases, that seemed to do the trick, though I've no idea why it worked. Perhaps something having to do with wiping the cache.
[HTC Flyer, EVO View 4G] readable:
You are right. That is the problem.

I have tried several things.

1. rebooting

2. Clearing caches.

I am not sure what to do next.